Voice Tremor Response to Deep Brain Stimulation in Relation to Electrode Location in the Posterior Subthalamic Area

Bilateral Deep Brain Stimulation of the Ventral Intermediate Nucleus of the Thalamus Improves Objective Acoustic Measures of Essential Vocal Tremor

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Deep brain stimulation of the ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus (VIM-DBS) is an established treatment for medically refractory essential tremor. However, the effect of VIM-DBS on vocal tremor remains poorly understood, with results varying by method of vocal tremor assessment and stimulation laterality. This single-center study measures the effect of bilateral VIM-DBS on essential vocal tremor using blinded objective acoustic voice analysis.

METHODS

Ten patients with consecutive essential tremor with comorbid vocal tremor receiving bilateral VIM-DBS underwent voice testing before and after implantation of DBS in this prospective cohort study. Objective acoustic measures were extracted from the middle one second of steady-state phonation including cepstral peak prominence, signal-to-noise ratio, percentage voicing, tremor rate, extent of fundamental frequency modulation, and extent of intensity modulation. DBS surgery was performed awake with microelectrode recording and intraoperative testing. Postoperative voice testing was performed after stable programming.

RESULTS

Patients included 6 female and 4 male, with a mean age of 67 ± 6.7 years. The VIM was targeted with the following coordinates relative to the mid-anterior commissure:posterior commissure point: 13.2 ± 0.6 mm lateral, 6.2 ± 0.7 mm posterior, and 0.0 mm below. Mean programming parameters were amplitude 1.72.0 ± 0.6 mA, pulse width 63.0 ± 12.7 µs, and rate 130.6 ± 0.0 Hz. VIM-DBS significantly improved tremor rate from 4.43 ± 0.8 Hz to 3.2 ± 0.8 Hz (P = .001) CI (0.546, 1.895), jitter from 1 ± 0.94 to 0.53 ± 0.219 (P = .02) CI (-0.124, 1.038), cepstral peak prominence from 13.6 ± 3.9 to 18.8 ± 2.9 (P = .016) CI (-4.100, -0.235), signal-to-noise ratio from 15.7 ± 3.9 to 18.5 ± 3.7 (P = .02) CI (-5.598, -0.037), and articulation rate from 0.77 ± 0.2 to 0.82 ± .14 (P = .04) CI (-0.097, 0.008). There were no major complications in this series.

CONCLUSION

Objective acoustic voice analyses suggest that bilateral VIM-DBS effectively reduces vocal tremor rate and improves voicing. Further studies using objective acoustic analyses and laryngeal imaging may help refine surgical and stimulation techniques and evaluate the effect of laterality on vocal tremor.

Speech Function Following Deep Brain Stimulation of the Caudal Zona Incerta: Effects of Habitual and High-Amplitude Stimulation

Purpose Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is often successful in alleviating motor symptoms of essential tremor (ET); however, DBS may also induce adverse speech effects. The caudal zona incerta (cZi) is a promising DBS target for tremor, but less is known about the consequences of cZi DBS for speech. This preliminary study examined how habitual cZi DBS and cZi stimulation at high amplitudes may affect speech function in persons with ET. Method Fourteen participants with ET were evaluated: off stimulation, on habitual cZi DBS, and with unilateral cZi stimulation at increasing stimulation amplitudes. At each stimulation condition, the participants read three 16-word sentences. Two speech-language pathologists made audio-perceptual consensus ratings of overall speech function, articulation, and voice using a visual sort and rate method. Rated functions when off stimulation, on habitual cZi DBS, and at maximal-amplitude stimulation were compared using Friedman nonparametric tests. For participants with bilateral habitual DBS (n = 5), the effects of bilateral and unilateral stimulation were described in qualitative terms. Results Habitual cZi DBS had no significant group-level effect on any of the investigated speech parameters. Maximal-amplitude stimulation had a small but significant negative effect on articulation. Participants with reduced articulatory precision (n = 9) had more medially placed electrodes than the nonaffected group (n = 5). Bilateral and unilateral left stimulation had comparable effects on speech. Conclusions Findings from this preliminary study of cZi DBS indicate that speech is generally not affected by stimulation at habitual levels. High-amplitude cZi stimulation may, however, induce adverse effects, particularly on articulation. Instances of decreased articulatory function were associated with stimulation of more medial electrode contacts, which could suggest cerebello-rubrospinal involvement.

Network Fingerprint of Stimulation-Induced Speech Impairment in Essential Tremor

OBJECTIVE

This study was undertaken to gain insights into structural networks associated with stimulation-induced dysarthria (SID) and to predict stimulation-induced worsening of intelligibility in essential tremor patients with bilateral thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS).

METHODS

Monopolar reviews were conducted in 14 essential tremor patients. Testing included determination of SID thresholds, intelligibility ratings, and a fast syllable repetition task. Volumes of tissue activated (VTAs) were calculated to identify discriminative fibers for stimulation-induced worsening of intelligibility in a structural connectome. The resulting fiber-based atlas structure was then validated in a leave-one-out design.

RESULTS

Fibers determined as discriminative for stimulation-induced worsening of intelligibility were mainly connected to the ipsilateral precentral gyrus as well as to both cerebellar hemispheres and the ipsilateral brain stem. In the thalamic area, they ran laterally to the thalamus and posteromedially to the subthalamic nucleus, in close proximity, mainly anterolaterally, to fibers beneficial for tremor control as published by Al-Fatly et al in 2019. The overlap of the respective clinical stimulation setting's VTAs with these fibers explained 62.4% (p < 0.001) of the variance of stimulation-induced change in intelligibility in a leave-one-out analysis.

INTERPRETATION

This study demonstrates that SID in essential tremor patients is associated with both motor cortex and cerebellar connectivity. Furthermore, the identified fiber-based atlas structure might contribute to future postoperative programming strategies to achieve optimal tremor control without speech impairment in essential tremor patients with thalamic DBS. ANN NEUROL 2021;89:315-326.

Isolated Voice Tremor: A Clinical Variant of Essential Tremor or a Distinct Clinical Phenotype?

Background

The consensus statement by the Task Force on Tremor of the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society excludes individuals with "isolated voice tremor" as a clinical variant of essential tremor (ET). This clinical viewpoint presents a rationale for reconsideration of "isolated voice tremor" as a clinical variant of ET.

Methods

Evidence from the literature was extracted to characterize the clinical phenotype of "isolated voice tremor," or essential vocal tremor (EVT). Clinical features were extracted from relevant literature available at pubmed.gov using the terms "EVT," "essential voice tremor," "primary voice tremor," and "organic voice tremor."

Results

The average age of onset in those with EVT was older than 60 years (range 19-84 years), with 75-93% being female. The typical duration of vocal tremor ranged from 1 to 13 years (average 6 years). The distribution of structures exhibiting tremor included the larynx, soft palate, pharynx, and base of tongue in the majority of patients, with some exhibiting tremor of the head and respiratory musculature. The condition of tremor occurred during speech and quiet respiration in 74% of individuals. Rate of tremor ranged from 4 to 10 Hz. Nearly 70% reported onset of vocal tremor prior to upper limb involvement. Family history of tremor was reported in 38-42% of individuals.

Discussion

Those previously classified with EVT demonstrate a similar familial history, rate, tremor classification, and body distribution of ET. EVT is proposed as a clinical variant of ET in the pattern of onset and progression of body distribution from the midline cranial to spinal neural pathways.