2
|
Yim SY, Guthrie T, de Jersey SJ. Impact of service-wide initiatives to support healthy pregnancy weight gain on weight-related documentation. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2019; 60:355-360. [PMID: 31578721 DOI: 10.1111/ajo.13053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2019] [Accepted: 08/09/2019] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Excess gestational weight gain is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Addressing barriers to the provision of best practice care that supports healthy pregnancy weight gain could assist staff in clinical care; however, little is known about changes to staff practices after ameliorating barriers. AIMS To evaluate if service initiatives to promote healthy pregnancy weight gain improve weight-related documentation by antenatal staff throughout pregnancy care. MATERIALS AND METHODS Service initiatives including staff training, familiarisation with a pregnancy weight gain chart and placement of scales in clinic rooms were introduced. Pregnancy health records were audited for deliveries pre- (2014) and post-implementation (2017) to obtain weight-related measures. Measures assessed included the documentation of pre-pregnancy weight, height, pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI), referral to dietetic services (if overweight) and the accuracy of pre-pregnancy BMI calculation. The proportion of visits with weight recorded during pregnancy was also audited. RESULTS A total of 1003 and 1050 records were included from the pre- and post-intervention groups respectively. Significant improvements over time were observed in the documentation of pre-pregnancy weight (P < 0.001), BMI (P < 0.001), accuracy of BMI calculation (P < 0.001) and for obese women proportion of visits with weight recorded (P = 0.02). There was a non-significant increase in the documentation of dietetic referral for overweight women (1.1% vs 2.2%, P = 0.27) and proportion of visits with weight recorded for women across all pre-pregnancy BMI groups (49% vs 51%, P = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS Addressing barriers to supporting healthy pregnancy weight gain through service-wide initiatives may improve weight-related documentation by antenatal staff.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shi Ying Yim
- Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore City, Singapore.,School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Taylor Guthrie
- Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Susan J de Jersey
- School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fealy SM, Taylor RM, Foureur M, Attia J, Ebert L, Bisquera A, Hure AJ. Weighing as a stand-alone intervention does not reduce excessive gestational weight gain compared to routine antenatal care: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2017; 17:36. [PMID: 28095821 PMCID: PMC5240423 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-016-1207-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2016] [Accepted: 12/23/2016] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Excessive gestational weight gain is associated with short and long-term adverse maternal and infant health outcomes, independent of pre-pregnancy body mass index. Weighing pregnant women as a stand-alone intervention during antenatal visits is suggested to reduce pregnancy weight gain. In the absence of effective interventions to reduce excessive gestational gain within the real world setting, this study aims to test if routine weighing as a stand-alone intervention can reduce total pregnancy weight gain and, in particular, excessive gestational weight gain. Methods A systematic review and meta–analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted between November 2014 and January 2016, and reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Seven databases were searched. A priori eligibility criteria were applied to published literature by at least two independent reviewers. Studies considered methodologically rigorous, as per the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Quality Criteria Checklist for Primary Research, were included. Meta-analysis was conducted using fixed-effects models. Results A total of 5223 (non-duplicated) records were screened, resulting in two RCTs that were pooled for meta-analysis (n = 1068 randomised participants; n = 538 intervention, n = 534 control). No difference in total weight gain per week was observed between intervention and control groups (weighted mean difference (WMD) -0.00 kg/week, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.03 to 0.02). There was also no reduction in excessive gestational weight gain between intervention and control, according to pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI). However, total weight gain was lower in underweight women (n = 23, BMI <18.5 kg/m2) in the intervention compared to control group (−0.12 kg/week, 95% CI −0.23 to −0.01). No significant differences were observed for other pregnancy, birth and infant outcomes. Conclusion Weighing as a stand-alone intervention is not worse nor better at reducing excessive gestational weight gain than routine antenatal care. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12884-016-1207-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shanna M Fealy
- School of Nursing & Midwifery University of Newcastle, Port Macquarie Campus, PO Box 210, Port Macquarie, 2444, NSW, Australia. .,Faculty of Health & Medicine School of Medicine & Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia. .,Maternity Care Services, The Port Macquarie Base Hospital, Port Macquarie, NSW, Australia.
| | - Rachael M Taylor
- Faculty of Health & Medicine School of Medicine & Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.,Mothers and Babies Research Centre, University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, 2308, NSW, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Maralyn Foureur
- School of Nursing & Midwifery University of Newcastle, Port Macquarie Campus, PO Box 210, Port Macquarie, 2444, NSW, Australia.,Centre for Midwifery, Child and Family Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, PO Box 123, Broadway, Ultimo, NSW, 2007, Australia
| | - John Attia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.,Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medicine & Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.,Division of Medicine, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Lyn Ebert
- Faculty of Health & Medicine School of Medicine & Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - Alessandra Bisquera
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.,Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medicine & Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - Alexis J Hure
- Faculty of Health & Medicine School of Medicine & Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wilkinson SA, Donaldson E, Beckmann M, Stapleton H. Service-wide management of healthy gestational weight gain following an implementation science approach. MATERNAL AND CHILD NUTRITION 2016; 13. [PMID: 26898847 DOI: 10.1111/mcn.12266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2015] [Revised: 11/17/2015] [Accepted: 11/18/2015] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
The aim of health guidelines is to ensure consistency in the delivery of care to minimise health-related complications. However, even when good evidence is available, professionals do not necessarily implement it. Following a 2011 survey (Time 1) of staff in a tertiary maternity hospital, a number of service changes were implemented to facilitate best practice delivery of care to pregnant women regarding gestational weight gain (GWG). A (second) staff survey was then undertaken to re-assess staff knowledge, attitudes and behaviours around the management of GWG in our hospital. This cross-sectional, prospective online survey was distributed to staff in antenatal clinic. The survey assessed staff awareness of pregnancy-related weight complications, knowledge and application of specific guidelines, and a guideline adherence score was calculated. Sixty-nine staff (44.8% response rate) completed the 2014 (Time 2) survey. Just over half (51.9%) stated they were familiar with clinical guidelines regarding weight management in pregnancy. Guideline adherence ranged from 3.7 ± 1.9 to 11.3 ± 1.0 /15 across different professional groups; significant improvements with adherence by dietitians were noted over time. Despite minimal change over time in the overall adherence score, compliance with individual elements of the guideline recommendations comprising the adherence score differed. Improvements in staff practices and attitudes are apparent since the first survey. However, further improvements in guideline awareness and guideline elements are still required to improve the delivery of best practice antenatal GWG care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shelley A Wilkinson
- Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Mater Health Services, Brisbane, Australia.,Mater Research Institute-University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Elin Donaldson
- Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Mater Health Services, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Michael Beckmann
- Mater Research Institute-University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mater Mothers Hospital, Mater Health Services, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Helen Stapleton
- Mater Research Institute-University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|