Timing of hospital admission in labour: latent versus active phase, mode of birth and intrapartum interventions. A correlational study

The prevalence of pain catastrophising in nulliparous women in Nepal; the importance for childbirth

In Lower-Middle-Income-Countries women are encouraged to present at a birthing facility for skilled care, but attending early can be associated with additional harm. Women admitted in latent labour are more likely to receive a cascade of unnecessary interventions compared with those attending a birthing facility during active labour. One reason that women present early is pain, with higher rates of admission among those who pain catastrophise. The aim of this study was to explore the prevalence of pain catastrophising in nulliparous women in Nepal and to identify predictors for pain catastrophising. A cross sectional study was conducted using a semi-structured survey. The survey was completed by 170 women (18-32 years) in one higher education institution in Kathmandu. The survey included the pain catastrophising scale (PCS), current and previous pain and information about period pain, sociodemographic variables of age, ethnicity, and religion. The prevalence of pain catastrophising reported at a cut off score of PCS≥20 was 55.9% and at a cut off score of PCS≥30 was 17.1%. All women with a PCS ≥30 reported having painful periods. Those with a PCS≥20 were four times [95%CI 1.93-8.42] more likely to report painful periods affecting their daily activities (p<0.001) and those with PCS≥30 three times [95%CI1.10-10.53] more likely (p<0.05). In both cases ethnicity and age were not associated. Women with higher PCS were less likely to take pain medication. A high prevalence of pain catastrophising was reported. It is important to understand how women's previous negative experiences of pain and pain catastrophising are perceived and if they are contributing to the rise in obstetric intervention, particularly caesarean births, in Nepal. We recommend repeating this study with a larger sample representing a more diverse population.

Are expectations of labour and birth fulfilled? A qualitative investigation of first-time parents

AIM

To describe if first-time parents' expectations of labour and birth, explored during the third trimester of pregnancy, were fulfilled or not when investigated 1 year following birth.

DESIGN

Qualitative Husserlian phenomenological approach.

METHODS

The sample comprises 10 parents (five couples), who participated in an online semi-structured audio-recorded individual interview conducted 1 year after birth, between September 2020 and October 2020. Parents' expectations of labour and birth, described throughout a focus group discussion on pregnancy, were compared with their experience explored 1 year after birth. A thematic analysis was adopted and member checking was used to validate participants' thoughts.

RESULTS

Participants gave birth in a II level maternity unit and one-to-one midwifery care was provided. Although during the focus group conducted in pregnancy, women reported being aware of the unpredictable nature of childbirth, they expressed sadness and failure after experiencing some unexpected interventions. The midwife was a reassuring guide, as expected; however, sometimes, the communication was not effective, and women perceived lack of support. Some women partly blame themselves for not being prepared to manage labour pain, which hurt more than expected. Feeling of uncertainty about events were experienced in relation to seeking care at an early stage of labour, which confirmed the fears expressed during pregnancy. During the antenatal focus group discussion, fathers doubted they could be helpful for the labouring women. This negative emotion was confirmed after birth. However, they understood the importance to be present and to support their partner.

CONCLUSIONS

One year after birth, participants had consistent memories of their birth experience. Professionals might identify fundamental components of quality maternity care that are meaningful for parents, with the potential to generate a long-term positive health impact on them. Respectful maternity care should be ensured through a family-centred approach, with the aim to promote satisfaction.

IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE

The study highlights the importance of taking parents' expectations into account when providing antenatal care to tailor individualized support that addresses their distinct needs and preferences. Healthcare professionals might consider initiating a post-natal discussion with parents to assess whether their needs and perspectives have been addressed. This perspective may present valuable insights to achieve long-term positive outcomes, provide high-quality maternity care, address issues and make improvements.

IMPACT

The study showed that 1 year after birth, parents can accurately recall their birth. They might also give significant insights into fundamental components of care that they value as crucial to shape a positive birthing experience. Professionals should use this information to build solutions, promoting long-term well-being for parents. Respectful interactions and trusting relationships emerged as key elements in parents' experience. A midwifery care focused on parents' needs may contribute to the achievement of positive birth memories.

REPORTING METHOD

This study used the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

No patient or public contribution.

Using a birth ball to reduce pain perception in the latent phase of labour: a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Admission in the latent phase of labour is associated with higher rates of obstetric intervention. Women are frequently admitted due to pain. This study aimed to determine whether using a birth ball at home in the latent phase of labour reduces pain perception on admission.

METHOD

A prospective, pragmatic randomised controlled trial of 294 low risk pregnant women aged 18 and over planning a hospital birth. An animated educational video was offered at 36 weeks' gestation along with a birth ball. The primary outcome was pain on a Visual Analogue Scale on admission in labour. Participants who experienced a spontaneous labour were invited to respond to an online questionnaire 6 weeks' postpartum.

RESULTS

There were no differences in the mean pain scores; (6.3 versus 6.5; 90%CI -0.72 to 0.37 p = 0.6) or mean cervical dilatation on admission (4.7 cm versus 5.0 cm; 95% CI -1.1 to 0.5 p = 0.58). More Intervention participants were admitted in active labour (63.6% versus 55.7%; p = 0.28) and experienced an unassisted vaginal birth (70.3% v. 65.8%; p = 0.07) with fewer intrapartum caesarean sections (7.5% v. 17.9%; p = 0.07) although the trial was not powered to detect these differences in secondary outcomes. Most participants found the birth ball helpful (89.2%) and would use it in a future labour (92.5%).

CONCLUSION

Using the birth ball at home in the latent phase is a safe and acceptable strategy for labouring women to manage their labour, potentially postpone admission and reduce caesarean section. Further research is warranted.

Nulliparous Women's Expectations and Experiences of Early Labor

PURPOSE

To describe the expectations of early labor by nulliparous pregnant women in their third trimester and first-time mothers' experiences of early labor after they had given birth.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A descriptive qualitative approach involving semi-structured, video-call interviews conducted between September 2020 and April 2021. Data were analyzed using content analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-two women took part in this study. Only 3 of the 10 nulliparous pregnant participants reported pain as an expected symptom of early labor. There were two themes identified from interviews with pregnant participants: Desire to stay at home in early labor and Lack of knowledge and two themes from interviews from postpartum participants: Expectations didn't match experiences and Feelings of anxiety and uncertainty during early labor .

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Nulliparous women lack knowledge of and skills to effectively cope with pain during early labor while at home. There is a need for an innovative labor support program for childbearing women to remain safely at home in early labor.

Validating a predictive model for caesarean section in low-risk nulliparous pregnancies

PROBLEM

Caesarean birth (CS) rates are steadily increasing.

BACKGROUND

In 2017 Janssen et al. developed a model which could predict CB in nulliparous healthy woman with 71 % accuracy based on factors measurable on admission to the hospital.

AIM

To validate the predictive model for risk of caesarean birth among low-risk, nulliparous women in a new setting.

METHODS

A retrospective chart study in Abbotsford Regional Hospital (British Columbia, Canada) of healthy nulliparous women in spontaneous labour, at term, with a singleton fetus in cephalic position. Sociodemographic, pregnancy and labour-related characteristics were collected and independent predictors of CS were determined using multivariate logistic regression. The Janssen model was tested in the Abbotsford sample and additionally novel predictors were tested in an effort to improve the model. The area under the ROC curve (C-statistic) was computed and model calibration, sensitivity and specificity evaluated for the final model.

FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION

Of 348 women, 106 (30.5 %) had a CB. Applying the Janssen predictive model to the Abbotsford data resulted in a C-statistic of 0.77. No new predictors were added to the model. The mean predicted risk score for CS in the cohort was 0.30 ± 0.20. A risk score cut-off of 0.32 was determined resulting in a sensitivity and specificity of 69 %. The model had acceptable calibration.

CONCLUSION

A model with variables easily accessible at admission can predict caesarean birth in nulliparous women. The results from this study can guide provision of more intensive care during labour to women at higher risk, with the overall goal of reducing CB rates.

Perinatal outcomes after therapeutic rest in the latent phase of labor: A cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Therapeutic rest refers to the usage of medication to relieve pain in women in the latent phase of labor. Very few data are available to evaluate the safety and effect of its use. The objectives of this study were to compare perinatal and labor outcomes in women who were seeking hospital care during the latent phase of labor and who were treated either with or without therapeutic rest.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective cohort study with inclusion of nulliparous singleton pregnant women in the latent phase of labor presenting at the labor ward at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark from May 13, 2018 to June 1, 2021. We identified two groups: women who were treated with therapeutic rest and women who were not. The primary outcomes were neonatal admission and neonatal resuscitation. Secondary outcomes included use of cardiotocography during labor, nonreactive fetal heart rate, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, pediatric delivery room assistance, umbilical cord arterial pH and standard base excess, Apgar score at 5 minutes, interventions during labor and mode of delivery.

RESULTS

In our sample of 800 women in the latent phase of labor, 414 women (52%) were treated with therapeutic rest and 386 women (48%) were not. The most frequently used (n = 206) medication for therapeutic rest was a combination of paracetamol, triazolam and codeine. We found no significant difference in neonatal admission (9.2% vs 6.5%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.4-3.1) or neonatal resuscitation (2.4% vs 3.1%, aOR 0.7, 95% CI 0.1-4.0) between women treated with or without therapeutic rest. There were no differences between the two groups in other perinatal adverse outcomes, interventions during labor or mode of delivery.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found no significant association between therapeutic rest and neonatal admission or resuscitation. Our findings indicate that therapeutic rest is a safe method for managing the latent phase of labor concerning neonatal health and does not increase the risk of labor complications.

Planned hospital birth compared with planned home birth for pregnant women at low risk of complications

BACKGROUND

Observational studies of increasingly better quality and in different settings suggest that planned hospital birth in many places does not reduce mortality and morbidity but increases the frequency of interventions and complications. Euro-Peristat (part of the European Union's Health Monitoring Programme) has raised concerns about iatrogenic effects of obstetric interventions, and the World Health Organization (WHO) has raised concern that the increasing medicalisation of childbirth tends to undermine women's own capability to give birth and negatively impacts their childbirth experience. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 1998, and previously updated in 2012.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effects of planned hospital birth with planned home birth attended by a midwife or others with midwifery skills and backed up by a modern hospital system in case a transfer to hospital should turn out to be necessary. The primary focus is on women with an uncomplicated pregnancy and low risk of medical intervention during birth.  SEARCH METHODS: For this update, we searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register (which includes trials from CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, WHO ICTRP, and conference proceedings), ClinicalTrials.gov (16 July 2021), and reference lists of retrieved studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing planned hospital birth with planned home birth in low-risk women as described in the objectives. Cluster-randomised trials, quasi-randomised trials, and trials published only as an abstract were also eligible.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and risk of bias, extracted data, and checked the data for accuracy. We contacted study authors for additional information. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach.  MAIN RESULTS: We included one trial involving 11 participants. This was a small feasibility study to show that well-informed women - contrary to common beliefs - were prepared to be randomised. This update did not identify any additional studies for inclusion, but excluded one study that had been awaiting assessment. The included study was at high risk of bias for three out of seven risk of bias domains. The trial did not report on five of the seven primary outcomes, and reported zero events for one primary outcome (caesarean section), and non-zero events for the remaining primary outcome (baby not breastfed). Maternal mortality, perinatal mortality (non-malformed), Apgar < 7 at 5 minutes, transfer to neonatal intensive care unit, and maternal satisfaction were not reported. The overall certainty of the evidence for the two reported primary outcomes was very low according to our GRADE assessment (downgraded two levels for high overall risk of bias (due to high risk of bias arising from lack of blinding, high risk of selective reporting and lack of ability to check for publication bias) and two levels for very serious imprecision (single study with few events)).   AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This review shows that for selected, low-risk pregnant women, the evidence from randomised trials to support that planned hospital birth reduces maternal or perinatal mortality, morbidity, or any other critical outcome is uncertain. As the quality of evidence in favour of home birth from observational studies seems to be steadily increasing, it might be just as important to prepare a regularly updated systematic review including observational studies as described in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions as to attempt to set up new RCTs. As women and healthcare practitioners may be aware of evidence from observational studies, and as the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics and the International Confederation of Midwives collaboratively conclude that there is strong evidence that out-of-hospital birth supported by a registered midwife is safe, equipoise may no longer exist, and randomised trials may now thus be considered unethical or hardly feasible.

Early labour experience and labour characteristics after introduction of an electronic early labour educational intervention

OBJECTIVE

The study's aim was to compare first-time mothers' experience of early labour and subsequent labour characteristics before and after introducing an online early labour educational intervention. This article also reports on further testing of the underlying structure of the of the Early Labour Experience Questionnaire (ELEQ) in a Norwegian setting.

METHODS

Pre- and post-intervention cohorts were recruited. The ELEQ was translated into Norwegian, back-translated and distributed among primiparous mothers whilst in hospital. Confirmatory factor analyses were used to evaluate model fit, and the internal consistency of the scale was measured by Cronbach's α coefficient. The relationship between cohorts and demographic characteristics were analysed using chi-square statistics and t-tests.

RESULTS

Confirmatory factor analysis of the Swedish version of the ELEQ for primiparous women showed an acceptable fit. Neither the overall score nor the scores on the subscales for emotional well-being, emotional distress and perceptions of midwifery care differed significantly, but there was a significant difference between the groups on a few of the items. The cervix was significantly more dilated upon admission in the post-intervention group, and oxytocin use was significantly reduced. The number of telephone consultations increased significantly after the intervention was introduced.

CONCLUSION

The intervention did not improve women's experience with early labour. However, women who received the intervention were admitted in more advanced labour and required less oxytocin. The increased number of telephone consultations may indicate that an online early labour educational programme cannot replace women's need to communicate directly with staff.

Timing of hospital admission at first childbirth: A prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

It is difficult for women in labor to determine when best to present for hospital admission, particularly at first childbirth. While it is often recommended that women labor at home until their contractions have become regular and ≤ 5-minutes apart, little research has investigated the utility of this recommendation. This study investigated the relationship between timing of hospital admission, in terms of whether women's labor contractions had become regular and ≤ 5-minutes apart before admission, and labor progress.

METHODS

This was a cohort study of 1,656 primiparous women aged 18-35 years with singleton pregnancies who began labor spontaneously at home and delivered at 52 hospitals in Pennsylvania, USA. Women who were admitted before their contractions had become regular and ≤ 5-minutes apart (early admits) were compared to those who were admitted after (later admits). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess associations between timing of hospital admission and active labor status on admission (cervical dilation 6-10 cm), oxytocin augmentation, epidural analgesia and cesarean birth.

RESULTS

Nearly two-thirds of the participants (65.3%) were later admits. These women had labored for a longer time period before admission (median, interquartile range [IQR] 5 hours (3-12 hours)) than the early admits (median, (IQR) 2 hours (1-8 hours), p < 0.001); were more likely to be in active labor on admission (adjusted OR [aOR] 3.78, 95% CI 2.47-5.81); and were less likely to experience labor augmentation with oxytocin (aOR 0.44, 95% CI 0.35-0.55); epidural analgesia (aOR 0.52, 95% CI 0.38-0.72); and cesarean birth (aOR 0.66, 95% CI 0.50-0.88).

CONCLUSIONS

Among primiparous women, those who labor at home until their contractions have become regular and ≤ 5-minutes apart are more likely to be in active labor on hospital admission and less likely to experience oxytocin augmentation, epidural analgesia and cesarean birth.

Mothers' perspectives on the potential use of video-calling during early labour in the United Kingdom and Italy: A qualitative study

PROBLEM

Women in early labour are typically encouraged to delay maternity unit admission, but they may find this challenging without appropriate professional support.

BACKGROUND

Despite pre-pandemic research which identified potential advantages of video-calling in early labour, implementation of such service has not been reported.

AIM

To explore mothers' perspectives on potential use of video-calls during early labour.

METHODS

A multi-centre descriptive qualitative study was undertaken in UK and Italy. Ethical approval was gained and ethical processes were followed. Six virtual focus groups were conducted with 37 participants, 24 mothers who gave birth in the UK and 13 who gave birth in Italy. Line-by-line thematic analysis was performed and themes agreed.

FINDINGS

Two themes emerged: 1) women's expectations of video-calls' content and features; 2) technological challenges and solutions. Mothers responded positively to the concept of video-calling in early labour. Receiving guidance, information on coping with pain and advice on timely access in early labour was perceived as key. Women highlighted the importance of accessible, reliable and user-friendly technology. Equitable access, technological literacy, acceptability and privacy were considered as challenges to implementation, with solutions proposed to overcome disparities.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Guidance and training should be provided to midwives, with designated resources to build a service that is accessible, acceptable, safe, individualised and respectful for mothers and birth companions. Further research should explore feasibility, acceptability, clinical and cost-effectiveness.

‘Labour Hopscotch’: Women’s evaluation of using the steps during labor

INTRODUCTION

METHODS

RESULTS

CONCLUSIONS

Development and validation of a predictive model to identify the active phase of labor

Background

The diagnosis of the active phase of labor is a crucial clinical decision, thus requiring an accurate assessment. This study aimed to build and to validate a predictive model, based on maternal signs and symptoms to identify a cervical dilatation ≥4 cm.

Methods

A prospective study was conducted from May to September 2018 in a II Level Maternity Unit (development data), and from May to September 2019 in a I Level Maternity Unit (validation data). Women with singleton, term pregnancy, cephalic presentation and presence of contractions were consecutively enrolled during the initial assessment to diagnose the stage of labor. Women < 18 years old, with language barrier or induction of labor were excluded. A nomogram for the calculation of the predictions of cervical dilatation ≥4 cm on the ground of 11 maternal signs and symptoms was obtained from a multivariate logistic model. The predictive performance of the model was investigated by internal and external validation.

Results

A total of 288 assessments were analyzed. All maternal signs and symptoms showed a significant impact on increasing the probability of cervical dilatation ≥4 cm. In the final logistic model, “Rhythm” (OR 6.26), “Duration” (OR 8.15) of contractions and “Show” (OR 4.29) confirmed their significance while, unexpectedly, “Frequency” of contractions had no impact. The area under the ROC curve in the model of the uterine activity was 0.865 (development data) and 0.927 (validation data), with an increment to 0.905 and 0.956, respectively, when adding maternal signs.

The Brier Score error in the model of the uterine activity was 0.140 (development data) and 0.097 (validation data), with a decrement to 0.121 and 0.092, respectively, when adding maternal signs.

Conclusion

Our predictive model showed a good performance. The introduction of a non-invasive tool might assist midwives in the decision-making process, avoiding interventions and thus offering an evidenced-base care.

Development and validation of a tool for advising primiparous women during early labour: study protocol for the GebStart Study

INTRODUCTION

Pregnant women experience early labour with different physical and emotional symptoms. Early admission to hospital has been found to be associated with increased intervention and caesarean section rates. However, primiparous women often contact the hospital before labour progresses because they encounter difficulties coping with symptoms of onset of labour on their own. An evidence-based instrument for assessing the individual needs to advise primiparous women during early labour is currently missing. The study aims to develop and validate a tool to inform the joint decision for or against hospital admission.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A scale development and validation study will be conducted including following steps: (1) Generation of a pool with 99 items based on a scoping review and focus group discussions with primiparous women, (2) Assessment of content and face validity by an expert panel and item reduction to 32 items, (3) Multicentre data collection in six study sites in Switzerland, with application of the preliminary tool and the validation items with a target sample size of approximately n=400 women and (4), item reduction using exploratory factor analysis, factor loading and item-to-item correlation. Internal consistency of the tool will be assessed using Cronbach's alpha and convergent validity computing correlations of items of the tool with the German versions of the Childbirth Self-Efficacy Inventory and the Cambridge-Worry Scale. Analyses will be performed using Stata V.17.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval was obtained by the Ethics Committees Zurich and Northwestern and Central Switzerland (BASEC-Nr. 2021-00687). Results will be disseminated at the final study conference, at national and international congresses and by peer reviewed and not peer-reviewed articles in scientific and professional journals. Approved and anonymised data will be shared. The dissemination of the findings will have a contributable impact on clinical practice, scientific discussions and future research.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

DRKS00025572, SNCTP000004555.

Hospital Admission in the Latent versus the Active Phase of Labor: Comparison of Perinatal Outcomes

Background: Admission in the latent phase of labor has been associated with increased risk of obstetric interventions compared to admission in the active phase. We aimed to investigate the relationship between labor phase at admission and obstetric and neonatal outcomes. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 1005 women with uncomplicated singleton pregnancy admitted for spontaneous labor. Cesarean section rate and other perinatal outcomes were compared between women admitted in the latent phase and those admitted in the active phase. Results: Admission occurred in the active phase of labor for 331 women (32.9%) and in the latent phase for 674 (67.1%). Admission in the latent phase was more frequent in nulliparous than in multiparous (p < 0.01) and for Italian patients compared to foreigners. The incidence of caesarean section was similar between groups. Admission in the latent phase increased the likelihood of epidural analgesia (OR 3.47, 95% CI 1.96−6.14, in nulliparous, and OR 2.58, 95% CI 1.37−4.84, in multiparous) and increased the rate of augmentation of labor with oxytocin in multiparous (OR 2.87, 95% CI 1.05−7.85), without difference in neonatal outcomes. Conclusions: Admission in the latent phase is associated with more frequent use of epidural analgesia, without an increase in cesarean section or adverse neonatal outcomes.

Exploring pain characteristics in nulliparous women; A precursor to developing support for women in the latent phase of labour

BACKGROUND

Admission to hospital in the latent phase of labour is associated with a cascade of unnecessary intervention. Women who seek early hospital admission may have heightened fear and anxiety in relation to pain routed in their pre-pregnancy experiences.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of pain catastrophising in a healthy non-pregnant population and explore previous pain experiences and fear of childbirth as characteristics that might predict pain catastrophising.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study across two higher education institutions in Scotland and England using a semi-structured survey administered through Bristol Online Surveys. Four validated questionnaires were used to identify the prevalence of pain catastrophising and fear of childbirth in nulliparous women of reproductive age.

RESULTS

The survey was completed by 122 women undertaking an undergraduate degree and aged between 18 and 23 years. A high prevalence of pain catastrophising was found: a cut-off score of 20 and above = 47.5% (58/122 participants), a cut-off score of 30 and above = 21.3% (26/122). Fear of pain (β = 0.14, t = 4.21, p <0 .001) and pain-related anxiety (β = 0.40, t = 11.39, p <0 .001) were significant predictors of pain catastrophisation. However, there was no correlation between fear of childbirth and pain catastrophisation.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

It is reasonable to hypothesise that the pain catastrophising scale may be a good tool to predict those women likely to require additional support in the latent phase of labour; however further work is needed to explore this with a group of pregnant women.

Development of and Experiences With an Informational Website on Early Labor: Qualitative User Involvement Study

Background

The period of regular contractions before 4 cm of cervical dilatation is often referred to as the latent phase or early labor. Women find it challenging to prepare for and cope with this phase of labor, and easily accessed web-based information from reliable sources may be useful in this preparation.

Objective

The aim of this study is to describe the development of a Norwegian website, Latens.no, for people seeking information on early labor and to explore users’ experiences with the website to increase its user-friendliness.

Methods

We developed a website using an iterative process involving a multidisciplinary research team, health personnel, users, a graphic designer, and an expert in software development. We explored the website’s user-friendliness using semistructured individual interviews and the think-aloud method. All interviews were audio recorded and transcribed. We then analyzed the participants’ feedback on the website.

Results

Participants included women who had recently given birth to their first baby (n=2), women who were pregnant with their first baby (n=4), and their partners (n=2). Results from participants’ experiences completing tasks included positive feedback related to the content of Latens.no, positive feedback related to the website’s design, and suggestions for improvement. Participants wanted to find information on early labor on the internet. Moreover, they found the information on the website relevant, trustworthy, and easy to read, and the design was attractive and easy to use. Overall, the participants performed the tasks easily, with few clicks and minimal effort.

Conclusions

The think-aloud method, while performing tasks, allowed for detailed feedback. The participants confirmed the user-friendliness of the website but at the same time provided information enabling improvement. We expect that changes made based on this user-centered design study will further increase the usability and acceptability of Latens.no.

Association between early pregnant hospitalization and use of obstetric interventions and cesarean: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the association between early pregnant hospitalization and the use of obstetric interventions and cesarean delivery route.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study, with 758 women selected at the time of childbirth. It was assumed as early hospitalization when the woman was admitted to the hospital having less than 6 cm of cervical dilation. Logistic regression models were constructed in order to estimate the odds ratio for each obstetric intervention, adjusted by sociodemographic and obstetric variables.

RESULTS

73.22% of women were early hospitalized. On average, they had 1.97 times the chance to undergo Kristeller's maneuver, 2.59 and 1.80 times the chance to receive oxytocin infusion and analgesia, respectively, and 8 times more chances to having their children by cesarean delivery when compared to women that had timely hospitalization.

CONCLUSION

Early hospitalized women were submitted to a higher number of obstetric intervention and had increased chances of undergoing cesarean sections.

A cascade of interventions: A classification tree analysis of the determinants of primary cesareans in Australian public hospitals

BACKGROUND

Both globally and in Australia, there has been a sharp rise in cesarean births (CB). Commonly, this rise has been attributed to the changing epidemiology of women giving birth. A significant body of knowledge exists on the risk factors associated with a greater need for cesarean. Yet, we have little information on the reasons recorded by clinicians as to why cesareans are provided. This study aimed to explore the drivers of primary cesareans in Australian public hospitals.

METHODS

Using a linked administrative data set, the frequency and percent of mothers' characteristics were compared between those who had a cesarean birth and those who had a vaginal birth (n = 98 967) with no history of previous cesareans in Queensland public hospitals between July 1, 2012, and June 30, 2015. The top 10 reasons recorded by clinicians for a primary cesarean were reported. Using a machine-learning algorithm, two decision trees were built to determine factors driving primary cesarean birth.

RESULTS

"Labour and delivery complicated by fetal heart rate anomaly" (23%) and "primary inadequate contractions" (22.8%) were the top two reasons for a primary cesarean birth. The most common characteristics among mothers who had fetal heart rate anomalies were as follows: artificial rupture of membranes (39%), oxytocin (32%), no obstruction of labor (42%), and epidural (52%). For women who had primary inadequate contractions, the most common characteristics were as follows: epidural (33%), oxytocin (49%), artificial rupture of membranes (45%), and fetal stress (56%).

CONCLUSIONS

Efforts should be made by health practitioners during the antenatal period to maximize the use of preventative measures that minimize the need for medical interventions.

A qualitative study of Norwegian first-time mothers' information needs in pre-admission early labour

OBJECTIVE

To explore women's experience with information, and their information needs in pre-admission early labour.

DESIGN

A qualitative study with an exploratory and descriptive approach.

SETTING

Five focus group interviews with women attending post-natal care at five different well-baby clinics in South-Eastern Norway in 2019.

PARTICIPANTS

Sixteen first-time mothers who had given birth to a baby 3-17 weeks prior to the focus group interview. All had experience of staying at home in early labour.

FINDINGS

Three themes emerged from the analysis. The first and most substantial theme involved information. The women considered it necessary to have easy access to a suitable amount of trustworthy information at the appropriate time. The second theme described that the women were surprised at how early labour manifested, despite having prepared for it. The third theme was about receiving acknowledgement and support, revealing that information did not meet all woman's needs.

KEY CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The women found it challenging to prepare for early labour, and no matter how prepared they felt beforehand, unexpected situations arose. Easily accessed online information from reliable sources was useful in early labour, but in order for women to feel safe at home, this should be complemented by telephone conversations with skilled and welcoming midwives in the labour ward. More knowledge about women's information needs in early labour is required, including studies exploring how the information should be provided to help women feel safe when staying at home in early labour.

Variations in outcomes for women admitted to hospital in early versus active labour: an observational study

Background

There is no available evidence for the prevalence of early labour admission to hospital or its association with rates of intervention and clinical outcomes in Australia. The objectives of this study were to: estimate the prevalence of early labour admission in one hospital in Australia; compare rates of clinical intervention, length of hospital stay and clinical outcomes for women admitted in early (< 4 cm cervical dilatation) or active (≥4 cm) labour; and determine the impact of recent recommendations to define early labour as < 5 cm on the findings.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using medical record data from a random sample of 1223 women from live singleton births recorded between July 2013 and December 2015. Analyses included women who had spontaneous onset of labour at ≥37 weeks gestation whilst not a hospital inpatient, who had not scheduled a caesarean section before labour onset or delivered prior to hospital admission. Associations between timing of hospital admission in labour and clinical intervention, outcomes and hospital stay were assessed using logistic regression.

Results

Between 32.4% (< 4 cm) and 52.9% (< 5 cm) of eligible women (N = 697) were admitted to hospital in early labour. After adjustment for potential confounders, women admitted in early labour (< 4 cm) were more likely to have their labour augmented by oxytocin (AOR = 3.57, 95% CI 2.39–5.34), an epidural (AOR = 2.27, 95% CI 1.51–3.41), a caesarean birth (AOR = 3.50, 95% CI 2.10–5.83), more vaginal examinations (AOR = 1.73, 95% CI = 1.53–1.95), and their baby admitted to special care nursery (AOR = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.01–2.35). Defining early labour as < 5 cm cervical dilatation produced additional significant associations with artificial rupture of membranes (AOR = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.02–1.95), assisted vaginal birth (AOR = 1.96, 95% CI = 1.12–3.41) neonatal resuscitation (AOR = 1.73, 95% CI = 1.01–2.99) and longer maternal hospital stay (AOR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.04–1.40).

Conclusions

Findings provide preliminary evidence that a notable proportion of labouring women are admitted in early labour and are more likely to experience several medical procedures, neonatal resuscitation and admission to special care nursery, and longer hospital stay.

Oxycodone for pain management in the latent phase of labour - A pragmatic trial

BACKGROUND

Parenteral opioids are used for pain relief in labour but there are little data for oxycodone in this context. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, foetal exposure and safety of subcutaneous oxycodone in the latent phase of labour.

METHODS

This pragmatic trial included 76 parturients, who received subcutaneous oxycodone for pain relief in the latent phase of labour according to the hospital protocol: an initial dose 0.1 mg/kg, and a second dose, 0.05 mg/kg, could be administered four hours later. Pain intensity and pain relief were assessed using a numerical rating scale of 0-10. After delivery, blood samples from the maternal and umbilical veins were collected, and plasma concentrations of oxycodone and its main metabolites were quantified using UPLC-MS/MS. The Apgar scores and maternal and neonatal adverse effects were recorded.

RESULTS

The foetal exposure at birth was low, the median oxycodone and oxymorphone umbilical vein plasma concentrations were 1.2 ng/mL (range 0.21-7.8) and 0.14 ng/mL (0-0.26), respectively. Pain scores decreased substantially, from a median pain score of 7/10 before oxycodone to median scores of 5/10 at 30 minutes after administration, 5/10 at 60 minutes and 6/10 at 120 minutes. The median Apgar score was 9 (range 2-10) at 1 minute and 9 (6-10) at 5 minutes. Maternal adverse effects were mild, and there were no oxycodone-related neonatal adverse effects.

CONCLUSION

Subcutaneous oxycodone provided effective analgesia during the latent phase of labour. Newborn exposure at birth was low, and oxycodone was well-tolerated.

Variables related to maternal satisfaction with intrapartum care in Northern Italy

BACKGROUND

The experience of labour and birth is complex, multidimensional and subjective and has the potential to affect the women and their families physically and emotionally. However, there is a lack of research around maternal satisfaction in Italy.

AIM

To evaluate mothers' satisfaction with their childbirth experience in relation to socio-demographic characteristics, obstetric history and intrapartum care variables.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study involving 277 women who had given birth in a low risk maternity unit in Northern Italy was undertaken. Satisfaction with birth was measured using the Italian version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (I-BSS-R). The scale comprises three Sub-Scales: quality of care provided, personal attributes of women and stress experienced during childbirth.

FINDINGS

No socio-demographic variables were related to maternal satisfaction. Multiparous women had a higher satisfaction score (p=0.020; CI:0.23;2.75). Antenatal class attendance was negatively associated with maternal satisfaction (p=0.038; CI:-2.58; -0.07). Intrapartum variables that significantly reduced maternal satisfaction were: epidural usage (p=0.000; CI:-4.66; -2.07), active phase >12h (p=0.000; CI:-6.01; -2.63), oxytocin administration (p=0.000; CI:-5.08; -2.29) and vacuum assisted birth (p=0.001; CI:-6.50; -1.58). Women with an intact perineum were more likely to be satisfied (p=0.008; CI:-4.60; -0.69).

DISCUSSION

In accordance with other research, we showed that intrapartum interventions are negatively associated with maternal outcomes and therefore also with maternal satisfaction with birth. The sub-scale that measured Quality of Care provided scored higher than the other two Sub-Scales.

CONCLUSION

Further studies on maternal satisfaction in Italy should be conducted, using the I-BSS-R with the aim to compare outcomes and understand what matters to women during childbirth.

CARE IN THE PARTURITION PROCESS FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF NURSING PROFESSIONALS

ABSTRACT Objective: to reflect on nursing care for women undergoing parturition from the perspective of nursing professionals. Method: this is a study with a qualitative approach based on Convergent Care Research. The participants were 36 nursing professionals, who developed assistance activities for women undergoing parturition in an Obstetric and Gynecological Surgical Center of a University Hospital in southern Brazil. For data collection, the convergence group discussion technique was used, through audio-recorded thematic workshops following the phases of the process called Four Rs (4Rs), from June to August 2017. The data were analyzed using the thematic analysis proposed by Creswell, supported by the Iramuteq software. Results: five classes emerged: weaknesses/limitations in the parturition process; ambience and human resources in the parturition process; imposition of care and lack of privacy for women in the parturition process; process of being born: the understanding of nursing professionals; and contributions in the care process for a better birth. Conclusion: the present study allowed understanding the relationships of the nursing care for women in the process of parturition, identifying the barriers and weaknesses in the care process, reflecting and discussing possibilities for the systematization of nursing care in the parturition process.

Admitting women in active labour: A randomised controlled trial about the effects of protocol use on childbirth method and interventions

AIM

To determine the effects of protocol of admitting women in active labour on childbirth method and interventions during labour and childbirth.

METHODS

This single-blind randomised clinical trial was conducted in a public hospital in Mazandaran province (Iran) in 2017. Two hundred nulliparous low-risk women were randomly assigned into intervention and control groups. The participant women were admitted in the intervention group using the admission protocol and to the group control by staff midwives and doctors. The admission criteria of the protocol were: the presence of regular, painful contractions, the cervix at least four cm dilated and at least one of the following cues: cervix effaced, and spontaneous rupture of membranes, or "show". The primary outcome measure was childbirth method. Data were analyzed in SPSS-22 using Mann-Whitney and Chi-square tests. The level of statistical significance was set as p<0.05.

FINDING

There were significant differences between the intervention and control groups in the number of caesarian section (CS) (p<0.001). Two groups had a statistically significant difference in amniotomy (p=0.003), augmentation by oxytocin (p<0.001), number of vaginal examinations (p<0.001) and fundal pressure (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Using a protocol for admission of low risk nulliparous women in active labour contributed to reduction of the primary caesarean section rate and interventions during childbirth. A risk assessment and using evidence informed guidelines in admission can contribute to reduce unsafe and harmful practices and support normalisation of birth. This is essential for demedicalisation and a useful strategy for reducing primary CS.

Relation between Length of Exposure to Epidural Analgesia during Labour and Birth Mode

Objective: To appraise the relationship between the length of exposure to epidural analgesia and the risk of non-spontaneous birth, and to identify additional risk factors. This study is framed within the MidconBirth project. Study design: A multicentre prospective study was conducted between July 2016 and November 2017 in three maternity hospitals in different Spanish regions. The independent variable of the study was the length of exposure to epidural analgesia, and the dependent variable was the type of birth in women with uncomplicated pregnancies. The data was analyzed separately by parity. A multivariate logistic regression was performed. The odds ratios (OR), using 95% confidence intervals (CI) were constructed. Main outcome measures: During the study period, 807 eligible women gave birth. Non-spontaneous births occurred in 29.37% of the sample, and 75.59% received oxytocin for augmentation of labour. The mean exposure length to epidural analgesia when non-spontaneous birth happened was 8.05 for primiparous and 6.32 for multiparous women (5.98 and 3.37 in spontaneous birth, respectively). A logistic regression showed the length of exposure to epidural during labour was the major predictor for non-spontaneous births in primiparous and multiparous women followed by use of oxytocin (multiparous group). Conclusions: The length of exposure to epidural analgesia during labour is associated with non-spontaneous births in our study. It highlights the need for practice change through the development of clinical guidelines, training programs for professionals and the continuity of midwifery care in order to support women to cope with labour pain using less invasive forms of analgesia. Women also need to be provided with evidence-based information.