A cross-sectional survey of pregnant women’s perceptions of routine domestic and family violence screening and responses by midwives: Testing of three new tools

Educational training programs on intimate partner violence in pregnancy for midwives/student midwives: A scoping review

INTRODUCTION

Educational strategies for preventive screening and effective interventions in midwives are needed to improve clinical practice and outcomes for abused women and their families. This scoping review aimed to describe available educational training programs on intimate partner violence (IPV) in pregnancy for midwives/student midwives.

METHODS

A scoping review of the literature, which was published in English from January 2010 to March 2023, in PUBMED, EBSCO, and CINAHAL databases, was applied. The following keywords were used in the search: 'evaluation', 'educational training', 'course', 'midwives', 'student midwife', 'intimate partner violence', 'pregnancy', combined with AND and OR Boolean operators. The included studies focused on training programs/courses for midwives/student midwives regarding intimate partner violence.

RESULTS

A total of 9 studies were eligible for inclusion, describing six programs for midwives and 3 for student midwives. Educational interventions varied in length (e.g. a few hours to weeks) and educational approaches such as multidisciplinary sessions, lectures, theory, role-playing, practice in screening, group activities, watching videos, and case reports discussion. The programs had similar content, including raising awareness of violence, defining it, discussing gender roles, the impact of IPV on women's health, referral agencies, and the laws regarding violence in each country.

CONCLUSIONS

This scoping review highlighted a lack of educational programs on intimate partner violence during pregnancy, suggesting that new programs need to be developed based on contemporary clinical practices and recommendations for midwifery education.

Patient and Caregiver Perspectives on Implementation of ACE Screening in Pediatric Care Settings: A Qualitative Evaluation

INTRODUCTION

This qualitative research study explored the perspectives of adolescents, 12 to 19-years-old, and caregivers of children under 12-years-old on the acceptibility of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) screenings in five pediatric clinics.

METHOD

A constructivist grounded theory approach was utilized. One-on-one semistructured phone interviews were conducted with 44 adolescents and 95 caregivers of children less than 12 years old. Interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Most participants reported feeling comfortable discussing ACEs with their providers. Some reported that screening helped build trust. Others expressed privacy concerns and did not receive information about the reason for screening. Adolescent patients shared conflicting feelings-of both comfort and discomfort. Caregivers attending to multiple children, foster parents, and monolingual Spanish speakers disclosed unique challenges to ACEs screening. We found no evidence of lasting adverse effects.

DISCUSSION

Participants generally found ACEs screenings acceptable. Some adolescents identified benefits from the experience. However, clinics planning to adopt routine ACEs screening should ensure clear messaging on why screening is occurring, anticipate and address privacy concerns, and adopt workflows to discuss screening results.

The impact of screening for social risks on OBGYN patients and providers: A systematic review of current evidence and key gaps

BACKGROUND

Increasingly, policymakers and professional organizations support screening for social assets and risks during clinical care. Scant evidence exists on how screening impacts patients, providers, or health systems.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review published literature for evidence of the clinical utility of screening for social determinants of health in clinical obstetric and gynecologic (OBGYN) care.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We systematically searched Pubmed (March 2022, 5,302 identified) and identified additional articles using hand sorting (searching articles citing key articles (273 identified) and through bibliography review (20 identified)).

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all articles that measured a quantitative outcome of systematic social determinants of health (SDOH) screening in an OBGYN clinical setting. Each identified citation was reviewed by two independent reviewers at both the title/abstract and full text stages.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We identified 19 articles for inclusion and present the results using narrative synthesis.

MAIN RESULTS

The majority of articles reported on SDOH screening during prenatal care (16/19) and the most common SDOH was intimate partner violence (13/19 studies). Overall, patients had favorable attitudes towards SDOH screening (in 8/9 articles measuring attitudes), and referrals were common following positive screening (range 5.3%-63.6%). Only two articles presented data on the effects of SDOH screening on clinicians and none on health systems. Three articles present data on resolution of social needs, with inconsistent results.

CONCLUSIONS

Limited evidence exists on the benefits of SDOH screening in OBGYN clinical settings. Innovative studies leveraging existing data collection are needed to expand and improve SDOH screening.

Australian women's perspectives of routine enquiry into domestic violence before and after birth

BACKGROUND

Peripartum women are vulnerable to experiencing intimate partner violence (IPV). Interactions with health practitioners during maternity care provide a unique opportunity to detect and respond to women who are experiencing IPV. The aim of this study was to explore women's experiences of IPV screening at an Australian maternity service.

METHODS

Qualitative methodology was used in this cross-sectional study. In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with women with IPV who attended an Australian maternity service. Thematic analysis was used to identify codes and themes.

RESULTS

The nine women expressed three major themes, and six sub-themes, surrounding clinician approaches (communication and support, asking about IPV, and following disclosure), system considerations (fear of child safety involvement, continuity of care, and environmental considerations), and education. All participants supported screening and highlighted beneficial or detrimental approaches to screening and care, and recommendations for improvement.

CONCLUSION

This research points to the benefit of trauma-informed frameworks in hospitals to support women experiencing IPV.

Maternal adverse childhood experiences and their association with preterm birth: secondary analysis of data from universal health visiting

Background

Being born before full gestation can have short-term and life-long health implications, yet it remains difficult to determine the risk of preterm birth among expectant mothers. Across different health settings, increasing attention is given to the health and behavioural consequences of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) such as child abuse or neglect, or exposure to harmful household environments (e.g. in which caregivers abuse alcohol), and the potential value of understanding these hidden harms when supporting individuals and families. A large international evidence base describes the association between childhood adversity and early years outcomes for mothers and children. However, the relationship between maternal ACEs and preterm birth has received far less attention.

Methods

Secondary analysis was carried out on anonymised cross-sectional data from health visiting services in south and west Wales that had previously captured information on mothers’ ACEs during routine contacts. Demographic data and information on mothers’ health were extracted from the Healthy Child Wales Programme.

Results

Half of all mothers sampled had experienced at least one ACE, with a history of ACEs more common among younger, white British mothers and those residing in deprived areas. Preterm birth was significantly independently associated with retrospective reports of childhood sexual abuse (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 3.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.19–12.32, p = 0.025), neglect (AOR = 7.60, 95%CI = 1.81–31.97, p = 0.006) and overall ACE exposure (AOR = 2.67, 95%CI = 1.14–6.23, p = 0.024), with one in ten mothers (10.0%) who experienced ≥4 ACEs having preterm birth. Sub-analyses revealed a more pronounced relationship among mothers with no known chronic health conditions, with those with ≥4 ACEs and no known chronic condition four times more likely to give birth preterm (AOR = 3.89, 95%CI = 1.40–10.80, p = 0.009).

Conclusions

Findings highlight the importance of the entire maternal experience. The experience of childhood adversity can have a lasting impact into and beyond the prenatal period, potentially increasing the risk of preterm birth, even among otherwise healthy women. Increasing our understanding of the potential perinatal outcomes associated with ACEs can help to inform how maternity services and partners offer trauma-sensitive support to mitigate some of the risks of early parturition, as well as target intergenerational cycles of adversity and poor health.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-022-04454-z.

Australian hospital staff perceptions of barriers and enablers of domestic and family violence screening and response

Background

Hospital presentations provide unique opportunities to detect DFV. However, up to 70% of women experiencing Domestic and Family Violence (DFV) go undetected by hospital staff. While routine DFV screening is internationally encouraged, there is still much debate surrounding its implementation. The aim of the study was to determine staff perceptions of barriers and enablers of DFV screening and response.

Methods

A cross-sectional survey was conducted at a tertiary level public hospital and health service. Health care staff in allied health, maternity and mental health divisions (n = 615) were invited to participate by email and through team meetings. 172 responses were analysed.

Results

Less than a third of respondents reported routinely asking patients about DFV, with 34.9% reporting they did not have sufficient training to assist with DFV. Increased levels of training were positively correlated with screening practices, preparedness and knowledge. Major barriers were presence of partner and language barriers, while written protocols and supportive work environment were the principal enablers of screening.

Conclusion

Staff generally believed that routine screening was important and should encompass all forms of abuse. Many felt ill-equipped to ask about or manage disclosure of DFV. More training improves staff capacity for DFV detection and response, and written guidelines should be made available to all staff.

The antenatal risk questionnaire-revised: Development, use and test-retest reliability in a community sample of pregnant women in Australia

BACKGROUND

Routine psychosocial assessment during pregnancy and the first postnatal year is a public health strategy that prioritises early identification of known risk factors for poor perinatal mental health. We aimed to report on the development and use of the Antenatal Risk Questionnaire-Revised (ANRQ-R), contribute normative data for a community sample of pregnant women and examine its test-retest reliability.

METHODS

The ANRQ-R was developed in consultation with an expert advisory group. Women completed the ANRQ-R with their midwife at their first antenatal appointment. Test-retest analysis was restricted to women who consented to follow-up and completed a repeat ANRQ-R within four weeks.

RESULTS

7183 women completed the ANRQ-R (total score M = 12.05, Mdn=10; range =5-49). There were some statistically significant differences in total score across maternal age group (χ²=69.75, p<.001), country of birth (χ²=144.01, p<.001) and socioeconomic quintiles (χ²=20.13, p<.001), however the effect sizes of all differences were either small or not clinically significant. Test-retest reliability for the ANRQ-R total score was good (N = 1670; ICC=0.77). Item-level test-retest reliabilities were moderate to good (ICC range=0.65-0.80; kappa coefficient range=0.31-0.74).

LIMITATIONS

The study was conducted at a single site. Although there was significant diversity in terms of maternal age and country of birth, the majority of participants were partnered and resided in socio-economically advantaged areas, limiting the generalisability of results.

CONCLUSIONS

This study contributes significant normative data for the ANRQ-R and offers valuable insights for clinicians and researchers working with particular sub-groups of the perinatal population. Additional psychometric examination of the ANRQ-R, including its concurrent and predictive validity, is required.

Screening for adverse childhood experiences in preventive medicine settings: a scoping review

Aim

Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are associated with numerous adverse mental and physical health outcomes. While interest in routine screening for ACEs is growing, there is still significant opposition to universal screening. This review explores the feasibility of implementing routine screening for ACEs in primary care settings.

Subject and methods

We searched PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO, reference-mined relevant reviews, and consulted with key experts (June 2020). Studies from 1970 to date evaluating screening for childhood trauma, adversity, and ACEs in a routine healthcare setting, reporting quantitative or qualitative data were eligible. The project is registered in Open Science Framework (osf.io/5wef8) and reporting follows PRISMA-ScR guidelines.

Results

Searches retrieved 1402 citations. Of 246 publications screened as full text, 43 studies met inclusion criteria. Studies evaluated provider burden, familiarity with ACEs, practice characteristics, barriers to screening, frequency of ACE inquiry, reported or desired training, patient comfort, and referrals to support services.

Conclusions

This review found that the following factors increase the likelihood that ACE screenings can be successfully integrated into healthcare settings: staff trainings that increase provider confidence and competence in administering screenings, accessible and robust mental health resources, and organizational support. Further research should examine the scalability and sustainability of universal screening.

Who is Being Screened for Intimate Partner Violence in Primary Care Settings? Secondary Data Analysis of a Cluster Randomised Trial

OBJECTIVES

To assess sociodemographic differences in postpartum women screened for intimate partner violence and who disclosed to their Maternal and Child Health nurses.

METHODS

Secondary analyses of survey data from women participating in a cluster randomised trial. The trial tested a nurse-designed, enhanced violence screening model-versus routine screening among eight community nurse clinics in Melbourne, Australia. Self-completion anonymous surveys were sent to all clinic attendees who had given birth in the previous eight months. We measured intimate partner violence with the Composite Abuse Scale and other sociodemographic variables. Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyse characteristics of screened versus unscreened women and those who did or did not disclose.

RESULTS

91 clinics (163 nurses) participated in the trial. 2621/10,472 (25%) women responded to the survey. Notable characteristics, such as level of intimate partner violence (AdjOR 1.14, CI 0.94-1.40), parity (AdjOR 1.13, CI 0.94-1.35), education (AdjOR 1.20 CI 0.91-1.58) and being born in Australia (AdjOR 0.94, CI 0.86-1.03) made no significant difference to screening. However, nurses were significantly less likely to screen women with a lower income than those with a higher one (AdjOR 0.59, CI 0.40-0.87) with a dose response relationship. Women on the lowest levels of income were significantly more likely to disclose abuse (AdjOR 3.06, CI 1.02-9.17), indicating missed opportunities for nurses to provide timely care.

CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE

Despite being required to screen all women, nurses are almost twice as likely to screen more affluent women, who would be less likely to be experiencing or disclose intimate partner violence.

Screening for domestic violence during pregnancy follow-up: evaluation of an intervention in an antenatal service

To assess the impact of a brief training for obstetricians and midwives about screening for domestic violence during pregnancy follow-up and to identify barriers to a routine enquiry. A monocentric quasi-experimental study was performed in an obstetrics department in Paris, France. We asked patients during their pregnancy follow-up to complete a survey describing their demographic characteristics. They were also asked if a health professional had screened them for domestic violence during the current pregnancy. Exclusion criteria were refusal and inability to complete the survey alone. Health professionals attended a brief training about domestic violence. The intervention provided general information about domestic violence to alert health professionals (prevalence, risk factors, consequences on women's health, pregnancy, and children) and guidelines on screening and how to deal with women disclosing domestic violence. They also had to complete a survey about their knowledge and practice concerning domestic violence. Two months later, patients consulting for their pregnancy follow-up completed the same survey. Health professionals were not aware of the study's aim throughout its course. The primary outcome was the rate of patients screened for domestic violence during pregnancy follow-up. The secondary outcome was the identification of barriers to a routine enquiry. Four hundred ninety-five patients completed the first survey (control group): 21 patients (4.8%) had been screened for domestic violence. Twenty-one health professionals attended the intervention. Eight (38.1%) stated that they never screened for domestic violence, and 3 (14.3%) stated that they always did. Three hundred ninety-five patients completed the second survey (experimental group): 17 patients (4.3% vs 4.8%, p = 0.53) stated that they had been screened for domestic violence. The main barriers to screening mentioned by health professionals were the presence of the partner, the lack of awareness of the need to screen, uncomfortable feelings, and the difficulty to identify victims. There was no increased screening for domestic violence during pregnancy follow-up after a brief training of obstetricians and midwives. An early training during medical studies or more extensive training for professionals could be more efficient.