Understanding staff views and experiences of a clinical practice change to reduce stillbirth in South Asian women: A cross-sectional survey

Defining the transition from new to normal: a qualitative investigation of the clinical change process

Background

Understanding how and when a new evidence-based clinical intervention becomes standard practice is crucial to ensure that healthcare is delivered in alignment with the most up-to-date knowledge. However, rigorous methods are needed to determine when a new clinical practice becomes normalized to the standard of care. To address this gap, this study qualitatively explores how, when, and why a clinical practice change becomes normalized within healthcare organizations.

Methods

We used purposive sampling to recruit clinical leaders who worked in implementation science across diverse health contexts. Enrolled participants completed semi-structured interviews. Qualitative data analysis was guided by a modified version of the Normalization Process Theory (NPT) framework to identify salient themes. Identified normalization strategies were mapped to the Expert Recommendations for Implementation Change (ERIC) project.

Results

A total of 17 individuals were interviewed. Participants described four key signals for identifying when a novel clinical practice becomes the new normal: 1) integration into existing workflows; 2) scaling across the entire organizational unit; 3) staff buy-in and ownership; and 4) sustainment without ongoing monitoring. Participants identified salient strategies to normalize new clinical interventions: 1) taking a patient approach; 2) gaining staff buy-in and ownership; and 3) conducting ongoing measurement of progress towards normalization.

Conclusions

The results offer valuable insight into the indicators that signify when a novel clinical practice becomes normalized, and the strategies employed to facilitate this transition. These findings can inform future research to develop instruments that implementation leaders can use to systematically measure the clinical change process.

Fetal surveillance from 39 weeks' gestation to reduce stillbirth in South Asian-born women

BACKGROUND

In July 2017, the State of Victoria's largest maternity service implemented a new clinical guideline to reduce the rates of stillbirth at term for South Asian women.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of offering fetal surveillance from 39 weeks to South Asian-born women on rates of stillbirth and neonatal and obstetrical interventions.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a cohort study of all women receiving antenatal care at 3 large metropolitan university-affiliated teaching hospitals in Victoria, who gave birth in the term period between January 2016 and December 2020. Differences in rates of stillbirth, neonatal deaths, perinatal morbidities, and interventions after July 2017 were determined. Multigroup interrupted time-series analysis was used to assess changes in rates of stillbirth and induction of labor.

RESULTS

A total of 3506 South Asian-born women gave birth before, and 8532 after the change in practice. There was a 64% reduction in term stillbirth (95% confidence interval, 87% to 2%; P=.047) after the change in practice from 2.3 per 1000 births to 0.8 per 1000 births. The rates of early neonatal death (3.1/1000 vs 1.3/1000; P=.03) and special care nursery admission (16.5% vs 11.1%; P<.001) also decreased. There were no significant differences in admission to the neonatal intensive care unit, 5-minute Apgar score <7, or birthweight, or differences in the trends of induction of labor per month.

CONCLUSION

Fetal monitoring from 39 weeks may offer an alternative to routine earlier induction of labor to reduce the rates of stillbirth without causing an increase in neonatal morbidity and attenuating trends in obstetrical interventions.

South-Asian women's experiences of earlier additional, fetal monitoring to reduce stillbirth: An exploratory qualitative study

BACKGROUND

In an attempt to reduce the rates of stillbirth at term among South-Asian born women, Victoria's largest maternity service, Monash Health, implemented a new clinical guideline in 2017 that recommended additional earlier, twice weekly monitoring to assess fetal wellbeing from 39 weeks for South-Asian women. In acknowledging the importance of woman centred, culturally responsive care, this study aimed to understand South-Asian women's, experiences, of the additional earlier fetal monitoring.

METHODS

An exploratory qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured phone interviews six weeks postpartum, across June and July 2021, with South-Asian born women who underwent the earlier monitoring from 39 weeks. Women were asked questions regarding their understanding of the monitoring, their experiences of the monitoring process and any impact the monitoring or results had on their pregnancy, labour and birth. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed using a thematic approach and an inductive coding strategy.

RESULTS

Seventeen women from India, Sri Lanka, Pakistan and Afghanistan were interviewed. the main themes were i: gaining peace of mind, need for better communication, did the women really have a choice? and comparisons to maternity care in the country of origin. Women experienced positive reassurance of their baby's well-being from the monitoring and were happy with the earlier, extra care. However, women described receiving variable explanations of the purpose of the monitoring. Ineffective communication and logistical barriers were highlighted to negatively impact women's ability to engage in shared decision making and their overall experience of the earlier monitoring.

CONCLUSIONS

The additional monitoring is reported by these women to have an overall positive impact on their maternity care. Future work should explore the experiences of non-English speaking South-Asian women and those who declined monitoring.

Stillbirth: are we making more progress than we think? A retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To quantify how the changing stillbirth risk profile of women is affecting the interpretation of the stillbirth rate.

DESIGN

A retrospective, population-based cohort study from 1983 to 2018.

SETTING

Victoria, Australia.

POPULATION

A total of 2 419 923 births at ≥28 weeks of gestation.

METHODS

Changes in maternal characteristics over time were assessed. A multivariable logistic regression model was developed for stillbirth, based on maternal characteristics in 1983-1987, and used to calculate individual predictive probabilities of stillbirth from the regression equation. The number of expected stillbirths per year as a result of the change in maternal demographics was then calculated, assuming no changes in care and in the associations between maternal characteristics and stillbirth over time.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Stillbirth.

RESULTS

Compared with 1983-1987, there were more women in older age groups giving birth, more nulliparous women, more indigenous women and women born in Oceania, Asia and Africa, more multiple pregnancies and more women with pre-existing diabetes in 2014-2018. Despite this, the rate of stillbirth fell from 5.42 per 1000 births in 1983 to 1.72 per 1000 births in 2018 (P < 0.001). Applying the multivariable logistic regression equation, derived from the 1983-87 data, to each year, had there been no changes in care or in the associations between maternal characteristics and stillbirth, the rate of stillbirth would have increased by 12%, from 4.94 per 1000 in 1983 to 5.54 per 1000 in 2018, as a result of the change in maternal characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

Population rates of stillbirth are falling faster than is generally appreciated.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Population reductions in stillbirth have been underestimated as a result of changing maternal characteristics.