An integrative review of interventions for limiting gestational weight gain in pregnant women who are overweight or obese

Stress-related eating in pregnancy? An RCT examining links between prenatal stress and food choices

BACKGROUND

Diet quality during pregnancy is important for maternal health and offspring development. However, national dietary recommendations are not always met. A potential barrier for healthy food choices might be the experience of stress. Previous literature in non-pregnant populations suggests a negative effect of acute stress on diet quality. This preregistered study is the first to test whether an acute stressor leads to unhealthy food choices in pregnancy and examine the moderating role of stress, depressive and anxiety complaints in daily life.

METHOD

Pregnant women (N = 110, 3rd trimester) completed online self-reported surveys measuring stress, depressive and anxiety complaints in daily life. Hereafter, participants were invited for a laboratory visit, in which they were exposed to the Trier Social Stress Test or a control task. After this manipulation, self-reported and actual food choices and food intake were assessed. At the end of the visit, a hair sample was collected. Throughout the visit, visual analogue scales on negative affect were completed and saliva samples were collected.

RESULTS

The stress group experienced significantly more psychological stress than the control group during the experimental manipulation. Main regression analyses showed that the acute laboratory stressor did not cause unhealthy food choices in the third trimester of pregnancy. In fact, the stress group chose fewer unhealthy foods and consumed fewer kilocalories compared to the control group. Additionally, the findings point at a moderating role of depressive and stress complaints in daily life on food choices within the control group: higher scores were related to more unhealthy food choices and more kilocalories consumed.

DISCUSSION

As this was the first study to test the effect of an acute stressor on food choices in pregnant women, more research is needed to obtain a better understanding of stress-related eating in pregnancy. This knowledge may inform future interventions to support pregnant women in improving their diet quality.

The impact of gestational weight gain on fetal and neonatal outcomes: the Araraquara Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Gestational weight gain (GWG) is an important indicator for monitoring maternal and fetal health.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of GWG outside the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine (IOM) on fetal and neonatal outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective cohort study with 1642 pregnant women selected from 2017 to 2023, with gestational age ≤ 18 weeks and followed until delivery in the city of Araraquara, Southeast Brazil. The relationship between IOM-recommended GWG and fetal outcomes (abdominal subcutaneous tissue thickness, arm and thigh subcutaneous tissue area and intrauterine growth restriction) and neonatal outcomes (percentage of fat mass, fat-free mass, birth weight and length, ponderal index, weight adequateness for gestational age by the Intergrowth curve, prematurity, and Apgar score) were investigated. Generalized Estimating Equations were used.

RESULTS

GWG below the IOM recommendations was associated with increased risks of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) (aOR 1.61; 95% CI: 1.14-2.27), low birth weight (aOR 2.44; 95% CI: 1.85-3.21), and prematurity (aOR 2.35; 95% CI: 1.81-3.05), and lower chance of being Large for Gestational Age (LGA) (aOR 0.38; 95% CI: 0.28-0.54), with smaller arm subcutaneous tissue area (AST) (-7.99 g; 95% CI: -8.97 to -7.02), birth length (-0.76 cm; 95% CI: -1.03 to -0.49), and neonatal fat mass percentage (-0.85%; 95% CI: -1.12 to -0.58). Conversely, exceeding GWG guidelines increased the likelihood of LGA (aOR 1.53; 95% CI: 1.20-1.96), with lower 5th-minute Apgar score (aOR 0.42; 95% CI: 0.20-0.87), and increased birth weight (90.14 g; 95% CI: 53.30 to 126.99).

CONCLUSION

Adherence to GWG recommendations is crucial, with deviations negatively impacting fetal health. Effective weight control strategies are imperative.

Influence of gestational weight gain on the nutritional status of offspring at birth and at 5 years of age

OBJECTIVE

To determine the influence of pre-pregnancy maternal BMI and increases in maternal weight during pregnancy on perinatal and child outcomes at birth and at 5 years.

RESEARCH DESIGN/SETTING

A prospective cohort study was conducted between November 2016 and December 2021. The participants were a total of 115 women-child dyads, selected from among pregnant women receiving routine prenatal care in different health centres belonging to 2 health districts. Follow-ups were conducted with the women during pregnancy and with their children during the 10 days after birth and at 5 years.

FINDINGS

The total weight gain during pregnancy is influenced by an inadequate pre-pregnancy BMI (0.03; 95 % CI, 0.004 - 0.25; P=.001) and a greater increase in maternal BMI during the first and second term of pregnancy. A greater increase in BMI during pregnancy was associated with higher breastfeeding rates both in the short term (1.21; 95 % CI, 1.01-1.44; P = 0.04) and the long term (12 months: 1.30; 95 % CI, 1.02 - 1.67; P = 0.04; 24 months: 1.30; 95 % CI, 1.02 - 1.69; P = 0.04). No links were found between gains in maternal weight and the weight of the newborn, nor between maternal weight and/or pre-pregnancy BMI with the nutritional status of the child.

KEY CONCLUSIONS

After studying these results, it was concluded that promoting and implementing health and education policies focused on enhancing maternal nutritional status is essential to improve the nutritional status of children.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Healthy gestational weight gain (GWG) is an important issue to be addressed by the midwife in primary care, both in the preconception period and throughout pregnancy. As a result, it is important that the midwife is trained and has the appropriate resources and tools to work with pregnant women individually and collectively. In addition to paying attention to overweight and obese pregnant women, the midwife should also pay attention to women with a normal BMI, as they seem to have greater difficulty in maintaining a healthy weight gain. Another line of intervention to be addressed is breastfeeding (BF), where the midwife should be the main point of reference from the beginning of this process, taking into account the relationship between BMI and BF.

A Systematic Review of Women's Experiences of Interventions to Prevent Excessive Gestational Weight Gain

OBJECTIVE

To synthesize research on women's experiences of interventions to prevent excessive gestational weight gain.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic search of the following databases was conducted: CINAHL Complete, Maternity and Infant Care Database, American Psychological Association PsycArticles, American Psychological Association PsycInfo, and MEDLINE.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies were included if they involved primary research regarding the experiences of women who were pregnant or up to 1 year postpartum when reflecting on their involvement in interventions to prevent excessive weight gain during pregnancy. Nonempirical studies and those that examined experiences of women who were not pregnant or who were beyond 1 year postpartum were excluded.

DATA EXTRACTION

Information was extracted and captured in a summary table that included the study aim, participants, study design, intervention, findings, and summary score, with exceptions to quality.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Data were synthesized thematically into three themes: (a) Intervention Qualities Valued by Women, (b) Challenges Faced by Women, and (c) Perceived Benefits and Recommendations for Modifications.

CONCLUSION

Interventions intended to help women prevent excessive gestational weight gain should be tailored to individuals' unique needs to ensure that the interventions are acceptable and effective.

"Help me fight my constant battle": A focus group study of overweight and obese women's mHealth app experiences to manage gestational weight gain

OBJECTIVES

To understand and describe overweight and obese pregnant women's mHealth app experiences in managing gestational weight gain (GWG) for optimal weight goals.

DESIGN

A focus group study.

SETTING

We identified and invited pregnant women from a prenatal outpatient clinic in a metropolitan city in Northern Taiwan.

PARTICIPANTS

The participants were women whose pre-pregnancy BMI≥25 Kg/m2 at antenatal booking, and have experience using smartphone apps for pregnancy e-information. A total of 13 overweight and obese women were agreed to participate, their gestation weeks from 11 to 38 weeks.

METHODS

Three focus group of six sessions were conducted from July to October of 2019. Thematic analysis was employed to inductively analyze the qualitative data.

FINDINGS

Overweight and obese pregnant women...s major concern was to safely deliver a healthy baby. Main themes identified included: planning to know more and wanting to do right, feeling like a failure and having low self-expectations, struggling with life and desiring peace of mind, yearning to be supported and hoping to be seen, adjusting for the future and embracing new technology to engage in GWG management.

KEY CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The core theme was presented as high BMI pregnant women...s shared need to be well-equipped to fight their constant weight battle, reflecting these women...s mixed feelings and barriers toward GWG control and body image during pregnancy. Experiences with a GWG addressing mHealth APP seemed to be positive and further facilitated healthy eating and physical activities, participants... self-efficacy may be increased along with satisfactory APP adherence to prevent excessive GWG for women with obesity.

Effects of Probiotic Supplementation during Pregnancy on the Future Maternal Risk of Metabolic Syndrome

Probiotics are live microorganisms that induce health benefits in the host. Taking probiotics is generally safe and well tolerated by pregnant women and their children. Consumption of probiotics can result in both prophylactic and therapeutic effects. In healthy adult humans, the gut microbiome is stable at the level of the dominant taxa: Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes and Actinobacteria, and has a higher presence of Verrucomicrobia. During pregnancy, an increase in the number of Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria phyla and a decrease in the beneficial species Roseburia intestinalis and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii are observed. Pregnancy is a "window" to the mother's future health. The aim of this paper is to review studies assessing the potentially beneficial effects of probiotics in preventing the development of diseases that appear during pregnancy, which are currently considered as risk factors for the development of metabolic syndrome, and consequently, reducing the risk of developing maternal metabolic syndrome in the future. The use of probiotics in gestational diabetes mellitus, preeclampsia and excessive gestational weight gain is reviewed. Probiotics are a relatively new intervention that can prevent the development of these disorders during pregnancy, and thus, would reduce the risk of metabolic syndrome resulting from these disorders in the mother's future.

Weight gain during pregnancy: A narrative review on the recent evidences

Gestational weight gain is necessary for the normal fetus development, in fact a series of studies have evidenced that both low and excessive gestational weight gain is associated with negative fetal-neonatal outcomes. So, evidences on the optimal gestational weight gain across the ranges of the pre-pregnancy maternal body mass index are necessary. In this context, while for normal weight and underweight the recommendations of IOM are clearly stated and supported by well designed and conducted clinical studies, those for the obese pregnant women are even today debated. Pre-pregnancy obesity is associated with high risk to develop hypertension, gestational diabetes, cesarean section and high birth weight. The Institute of Medicine guidelines, in 2009, recommended that women with obesity gain 11-20 lb at a rate of 0.5 lb/week during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. Successively, taking into account a series of meta-analysis, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists emphasized that the IOM weight gain targets for obese pregnant women are too high. However the high risk to have babies small for gestational age, related to a low weight gain or a losing of weight during pregnancy, has also been demonstrated. More recent studies have taken into consideration the maternal and fetal outcomes of obese pregnant women with different obesity class (I,II,III) and different weight gain during pregnancy. The analysis of these studies, discussed in this narrative review, show that the appropriate gestational weight gain should be personalized considering the three obesity class; furthermore both an upper and lower limit of gestational weight gain should be reconsidered in order to prevent the negative maternal and fetal outcomes in these women.

Pregnancy Complications in Women with Weight Loss Surgery Compared to a Non-Surgical Population of Women with Obesity

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to assess the effect of WLS on pregnancy and delivery complications in women who had WLS compared to women with obesity who did not undergo WLS.

METHODS

We used the National Inpatient Sample data from 2012 to 2017, with a study population of women between the ages of 20 and 44 who had a maternal admission code in the NIS data (n = 663,795). Weighted logistic regression models were fitted and the models were stratified by race. Covariates included age, race, primary payer, previous cesarean delivery, physical health comorbidities, and depression.

RESULTS

There were decreased odds of gestational diabetes in women of all races (aORall = 0.47, 95% CIall = 0.44-0.49). There were decreased odds for gestational hypertension in women of all races (aORall = 0.55, 95% CIall = 0.51-0.59). Compared to women who did not have WLS, there were lower odds of cesarean delivery among women with a history of WLS (aORall = 0.62, 95% CIall = 0.60-0.65), which was true for White women, Black women, and Latinas with a history of WLS (aORWhite = 0.57, 95% CIWhite = 0.53-0.60; aORBlack = 0.67, 95% CIBlack = 0.61-0.74; aORLatina = 0.71, 95% CILatina = 0.64-0.78).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, women with history of WLS had lower odds of most of the pregnancy outcomes (gestational diabetes, gestational hypertension, pre-eclampsia/eclampsia, and cesarean delivery) with results mediated by race.