1
|
Henderson C, Ouali U, Bakolis I, Berbeche N, Bhattarai K, Brohan E, Cherian A, Girma E, Gronholm PC, Gurung D, Hanlon C, Kallakuri S, Kaur A, Ketema B, Lempp H, Li J, Loganathan S, Maulik PK, Mendon G, Mulatu T, Ma N, Romeo R, Venkatesh RK, Zgueb Y, Zhang W, Thornicroft G. Training for mental health professionals in responding to experienced and anticipated mental health-related discrimination (READ-MH): protocol for an international multisite feasibility study. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2022; 8:257. [PMID: 36514144 PMCID: PMC9745687 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-022-01208-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2022] [Accepted: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mental health and other health professionals working in mental health care may contribute to the experiences of stigma and discrimination among mental health service users but can also help reduce the impact of stigma on service users. However, few studies of interventions to equip such professionals to be anti-stigma agents took place in high-income countries. This study assesses the feasibility, potential effectiveness and costs of Responding to Experienced and Anticipated Discrimination training for health professionals working in mental health care (READ-MH) across low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). METHODS This is an uncontrolled pre-post mixed methods feasibility study of READ-MH training at seven sites across five LMICs (China, Ethiopia, India, Nepal and Tunisia). OUTCOME MEASURES knowledge based on course content, attitudes to working to address the impact of stigma on service users and skills in responding constructively to service users' reports of discrimination. The training draws upon the evidence bases for stigma reduction, health advocacy and medical education and is tailored to sites through situational analyses. Its content, delivery methods and intensity were agreed upon through a consensus exercise with site research teams. READ-MH will be delivered to health professionals working in mental health care immediately after baseline data collection; outcome measures will be collected post-training and 3 months post-baseline, followed by qualitative data collection analysed using a combined deductive and inductive approach. Fidelity will be rated during the delivery of READ-MH, and data on training costs will be collected. Quantitative data will be assessed using generalised linear mixed models. Qualitative data will be evaluated by thematic analysis to identify feedback about the training methods and content, including the implementability of the knowledge and skills learned. Pooled and site-specific training costs per trainee and per session will be reported. CONCLUSIONS The training development used a participatory and contextualised approach. Evaluation design strengths include the diversity of settings, the use of mixed methods, the use of a skills-based measure and the knowledge and attitude measures aligned to the target population and training. Limitations are the uncertain generalisability of skills performance to routine care and the impact of COVID-19 restrictions at several sites limiting qualitative data collection for situational analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Henderson
- Centre for Implementation Science, Health Services and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, De Crespigny Park Box, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8AZ, UK.
| | - Uta Ouali
- Department Psychiatry A, Razi University Hospital, Cité des Orangers, 2010, La Manouba, Tunisia
| | - Ioannis Bakolis
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Nada Berbeche
- Department of Psychology, Laboratory of Clinical Psychology: Intersubjectivity and Culture, University of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia
| | | | - Elaine Brohan
- Centre for Global Mental Health, Health Services and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK
| | - Anish Cherian
- National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bengaluru, India
| | - Eshetu Girma
- Department of Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Petra C Gronholm
- Centre for Global Mental Health and Centre for Implementation Science, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, De Crespigny Park Box, London, SE5 8AF, UK
| | - Dristy Gurung
- Transcultural Psychosocial Organization (TPO), Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Charlotte Hanlon
- Centre for Global Mental Health, Health Services and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK
- Department of Psychiatry, WHO Collaborating Centre for Mental Health Research and Capacity-building, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Sudha Kallakuri
- George Institute for Global Health, 308 Elegance Tower, New Delhi, 110025, India
| | - Amanpreet Kaur
- George Institute for Global Health, 308 Elegance Tower, New Delhi, 110025, India
| | - Bezawit Ketema
- Department of Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Heidi Lempp
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, Weston Education Centre, 10, Cutcombe Rd, London, SE5 9RJ, UK
| | - Jie Li
- The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, No. 36 Mingxin Road, Liwan District, Guangzhou, 510370, China
| | - Santosh Loganathan
- National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bengaluru, India
| | - Pallab K Maulik
- George Institute for Global Health, 308 Elegance Tower, New Delhi, 110025, India
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Gurucharan Mendon
- National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bengaluru, India
| | - Tesfahun Mulatu
- Department of Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Ning Ma
- Peking University Sixth Hospital (Institute of Mental Health), National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders & Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Ministry of Health (Peking University, No 51, Huayuanbei Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China
| | - Renee Romeo
- King's Health Economics, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, De Crespigny Park Box, London, SE5 8AF, UK
| | | | - Yosra Zgueb
- Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Wufang Zhang
- Peking University Sixth Hospital (Institute of Mental Health), National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders & Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Ministry of Health (Peking University, No 51, Huayuanbei Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China
| | - Graham Thornicroft
- Centre for Global Mental Health and Centre for Implementation Science, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, De Crespigny Park Box, London, SE5 8AF, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Henderson C, Ouali U, Bakolis I, Berbeche N, Bhattarai K, Brohan E, Cherian A, Girma E, Gronholm PC, Gurung D, Hanlon C, Kallakuri S, Kaur A, Ketema B, Lempp H, Li J, Loganathan S, Maulik PK, Mendon G, Mulatu T, Ma N, Romeo R, Venkatesh RK, Zgueb Y, Zhang W, Thornicroft G. Training for mental health professionals in responding to experienced and anticipated mental health related discrimination (READ-MH): protocol for an international multisite feasibility study. RESEARCH SQUARE 2022:rs.3.rs-1466318. [PMID: 35378758 PMCID: PMC8978942 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1466318/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Background: Mental health and other health professionals working in mental health care may contribute to the experiences of stigma and discrimination among mental health service users, but can also help reduce the impact of stigma on service users. However the few studies of interventions to equip such professionals to be anti-stigma agents those took place in High-Income Countries. This study assesses the feasibility, potential effectiveness and costs of Responding to Experienced and Anticipated Discrimination training for health professionals working in mental health care (READ-MH) across Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs). Methods: This is an uncontrolled pre-post mixed methods feasibility study of READ-MH training at seven sites across five LMICs (China, Ethiopia, India, Nepal, and Tunisia). Outcome measures: knowledge based on course content; attitudes to working to address the impact of stigma on service users; and skills in responding constructively to service users' reports of discrimination. The training draws upon the evidence bases for stigma reduction, health advocacy and medical education and is tailored to sites through situational analyses. Its content, delivery methods and intensity were agreed through a consensus exercise with site research teams. READ-MH will be delivered to health professionals working in mental health care immediately after baseline data collection; outcome measures will be collected post-training and three months post-baseline, followed by qualitative data collection. Fidelity will be rated during delivery of READ-MH, and data on training costs will be collected. Quantitative data will be assessed using generalised linear mixed models. Qualitative data will be evaluated by thematic analysis to identify feedback about the training methods and content, including the implementability of the knowledge and skills learned. Pooled and site-specific training costs per trainee and per session will be reported. Conclusions: The training development used a participatory and contextualized approach. Evaluation design strengths include the diversity of settings; the use of mixed methods; the use of a skills-based measure; and knowledge and attitude measures aligned to the target population and training. Limitations are the uncertain generalisability of skills performance to routine care, and the impact of COVID-19 restrictions at several sites limiting qualitative data collection for situational analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Henderson
- King’s College London Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience
| | | | - Ioannis Bakolis
- King’s College London Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience
| | | | | | - Elaine Brohan
- King’s College London Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience
| | - Anish Cherian
- NIMHANS: National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences
| | | | - Petra C Gronholm
- King’s College London Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience
| | - Dristy Gurung
- TPO Nepal: Transcultural Psychosocial Organization Nepal
| | - Charlotte Hanlon
- King’s College London Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience
| | | | | | | | | | - Jie Li
- Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University: Guangzhou Huiai Hospital
| | | | | | | | - Tesfahun Mulatu
- Addis Ababa University Department of Community Health: Addis Ababa University School of Public Health
| | - Ning Ma
- Peking University Institute of Mental Health: Peking University Sixth Hospital
| | - Renee Romeo
- King’s College London Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience
| | | | | | - Wufang Zhang
- Peking University Institute of Mental Health: Peking University Sixth Hospital
| | - Graham Thornicroft
- King’s College London Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Angermeyer MC, van der Auwera S, Carta MG, Schomerus G. Public attitudes towards psychiatry and psychiatric treatment at the beginning of the 21st century: a systematic review and meta-analysis of population surveys. World Psychiatry 2017; 16:50-61. [PMID: 28127931 PMCID: PMC5269489 DOI: 10.1002/wps.20383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 134] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Public attitudes towards psychiatry are crucial determinants of help-seeking for mental illness. It has been argued that psychiatry as a discipline enjoys low esteem among the public, and a "crisis" of psychiatry has been noted. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of population studies examining public attitudes towards various aspects of psychiatric care. Our search in PubMed, Web of Science, PsychINFO and bibliographies yielded 162 papers based on population surveys conducted since 2000 and published no later than 2015. We found that professional help for mental disorders generally enjoys high esteem. While general practitioners are the preferred source of help for depression, mental health professionals are the most trusted helpers for schizophrenia. If respondents have to rank sources of help, they tend to favor mental health professionals, while open questions yield results more favorable to general practitioners. Psychiatrists and psychologists/psychotherapists are equally recommended for the treatment of schizophrenia, while for depression psychologists/psychotherapists are more recommended, at least in Europe and America. Psychotherapy is consistently preferred over medication. Attitudes towards seeking help from psychiatrists or psychologists/psychotherapists as well as towards medication and psychotherapy have markedly improved over the last twenty-five years. Biological concepts of mental illness are associated with stronger approval of psychiatric help, particularly medication. Self-stigma and negative attitudes towards persons with mental illness decrease the likelihood of personally considering psychiatric help. In conclusion, the public readily recommends psychiatric help for the treatment of mental disorders. Psychotherapy is the most popular method of psychiatric treatment. A useful strategy to further improve the public image of psychiatry could be to stress that listening and understanding are at the core of psychiatric care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias C Angermeyer
- Center for Public Mental Health, Gösing am Wagram, Austria
- Department of Public Health, Clinical and Molecular Medicine, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Sandra van der Auwera
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Mauro G Carta
- Department of Public Health, Clinical and Molecular Medicine, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Georg Schomerus
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bhugra D, Sartorius N, Fiorillo A, Evans-Lacko S, Ventriglio A, Hermans MHM, Vallon P, Dales J, Racetovic G, Samochowiec J, Roca Bennemar M, Becker T, Kurimay T, Gaebel W. EPA guidance on how to improve the image of psychiatry and of the psychiatrist. Eur Psychiatry 2015; 30:423-30. [PMID: 25735809 DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2015.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2014] [Revised: 02/02/2015] [Accepted: 02/02/2015] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Stigma against mental illness and the mentally ill is well known. However, stigma against psychiatrists and mental health professionals is known but not discussed widely. Public attitudes and also those of other professionals affect recruitment into psychiatry and mental health services. The reasons for this discriminatory attitude are many and often not dissimilar to those held against mentally ill individuals. In this Guidance paper we present some of the factors affecting the image of psychiatry and psychiatrists which is perceived by the public at large. We look at the portrayal of psychiatry, psychiatrists in the media and literature which may affect attitudes. We also explore potential causes and explanations and propose some strategies in dealing with negative attitudes. Reduction in negative attitudes will improve recruitment and retention in psychiatry. We recommend that national psychiatric societies and other stakeholders, including patients, their families and carers, have a major and significant role to play in dealing with stigma, discrimination and prejudice against psychiatry and psychiatrists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Bhugra
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
| | - N Sartorius
- Association for the Improvement of Mental Health Programmes (AMH), Geneva, Switzerland
| | - A Fiorillo
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - S Evans-Lacko
- Department of Health Service and Population Research, King's College, London, UK
| | - A Ventriglio
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - M H M Hermans
- Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Fortuinstraat, Mechelen, Belgium
| | - P Vallon
- Swiss Society of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - J Dales
- University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - G Racetovic
- Centar za Mentalino Zdravlje, Prijedor, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - J Samochowiec
- Department of Psychiatry, Pomeranian Medical University, Poland
| | | | - T Becker
- Department of Psychiatry II,Ulm University,Bezirkskrankenhaus, Günzburg, Germany
| | - T Kurimay
- Institute of Behaviour Sciences, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - W Gaebel
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Corrigan PW, Druss BG, Perlick DA. The Impact of Mental Illness Stigma on Seeking and Participating in Mental Health Care. Psychol Sci Public Interest 2014; 15:37-70. [PMID: 26171956 DOI: 10.1177/1529100614531398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 652] [Impact Index Per Article: 65.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Treatments have been developed and tested to successfully reduce the symptoms and disabilities of many mental illnesses. Unfortunately, people distressed by these illnesses often do not seek out services or choose to fully engage in them. One factor that impedes care seeking and undermines the service system is mental illness stigma. In this article, we review the complex elements of stigma in order to understand its impact on participating in care. We then summarize public policy considerations in seeking to tackle stigma in order to improve treatment engagement. Stigma is a complex construct that includes public, self, and structural components. It directly affects people with mental illness, as well as their support system, provider network, and community resources. The effects of stigma are moderated by knowledge of mental illness and cultural relevance. Understanding stigma is central to reducing its negative impact on care seeking and treatment engagement. Separate strategies have evolved for counteracting the effects of public, self, and structural stigma. Programs for mental health providers may be especially fruitful for promoting care engagement. Mental health literacy, cultural competence, and family engagement campaigns also mitigate stigma's adverse impact on care seeking. Policy change is essential to overcome the structural stigma that undermines government agendas meant to promote mental health care. Implications for expanding the research program on the connection between stigma and care seeking are discussed.
Collapse
|
8
|
Angermeyer MC, Matschinger H, Schomerus G. Has the public taken notice of psychiatric reform? The image of psychiatric hospitals in Germany 1990-2011. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2013; 48:1629-35. [PMID: 23468004 DOI: 10.1007/s00127-013-0670-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2012] [Accepted: 02/22/2013] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In the context of mental health care reform in Germany, psychiatric hospitals have been transformed in terms of their infrastructure, staffing levels and therapeutic culture. The question arises as to what extent these improvements had an impact on the public image of these institutions. METHODS In 1990 and 2011, population surveys were conducted in the "old" states of Germany, using the same sampling procedure, interview mode and measures. RESULTS Over the last two decades, attitudes toward psychiatric hospitals have improved considerably. This improvement was particularly pronounced among those who had been in treatment for mental health problems. The public is now more inclined to regard psychiatric hospitals as similar to other hospitals, more ready to expect effective treatment in psychiatric hospitals, and less inclined to support the stereotype that psychiatric hospitals are primarily places where patients are locked away. However, there was a stronger tendency to agree with the notion that psychiatric hospitals are necessary to protect society from persons with mental illness. CONCLUSIONS The improvement of psychiatric care seems to pay off as regards the image of psychiatric hospitals among the general public. Further efforts are necessary to reduce the stigma attached to mentally ill people.
Collapse
|