A longitudinal mixed-methods study of IPE students' perceptions of health profession groups: Revisiting the Contact Hypothesis

A journey through interprofessional education: Students’ perspectives of teamwork in a transforming curriculum

Background. Student engagement in curricular transformation is topical at the University of Cape Town (UCT), including in its Faculty of Health Sciences (FHS). Teamwork, which is essential to contemporary interprofessional healthcare, is an objective of transformative health sciences education. This study offers a contemporary contribution from the perspective of students to earlier work on shared learning at UCT FHS.  Objectives. There is a paucity of research literature on this study’s target population. Therefore, a qualitative design was used to explore first-year health sciences students’ perceptions and experiences of teamwork within an undergraduate shared learning programme.  Methods. The primary data collection method was focus group discussion. Two additional qualitative methods, free-listing and pile-sorting, were used to expand upon data collected in the focus groups. Results were analysed thematically.  Results. The study sample (N=32) included first-year audiology, medical, occupational therapy, physiotherapy, and speech and language pathology students. The findings revealed that although their experiences of teamwork varied, students had a comprehensive perception of what teamwork entailed in their educational context. Therefore, the findings were used to generate a heuristic for teamwork learning for undergraduate health sciences students.  Conclusion. The study positions students to contribute tangibly to the curricular transformation process at their university. Students’ perspectives of teamwork may be useful in the future design and delivery of entry-level interprofessional courses aiming to instil teamwork skills.

Radiography students achieving competencies through structured interprofessional education

INTRODUCTION

Interprofessional education (IPE) takes place when representatives of at least two professions work and learn together, about and from each other to provide optimal healthcare. For the successful implementation of an IPE programme, conceptualisation, planning, and operationalisation and coordination among the various professions is crucial, to assist students to obtain the desired competencies of such a programme. The purpose is to investigate if a structured IPE programme assisted radiography students to achieve competencies.

METHODS

An online questionnaire was compiled from literature and completed by radiography students who participated in a structured, three-week-long IPE programme. The questionnaire was mainly quantitative (using a Likert scale), though it also consisted of qualitative elements (open-ended questions). A Fischer's Exact test was used to compare the responses of three different year groups.

RESULTS

Feedback from the radiography students (n=63) indicated that they achieved this IPE programme's specific competencies: role clarification, interprofessional communication, teamwork, person-centered care and values and ethics. There was good correlation between the feedback from all three year groups. The feedback on the open-ended questions correlated with the quantitative feedback, though some students felt excluded, as there was little reference to their particular profession in the simulation session of the IPE programme.

CONCLUSION

The results of the study indicate that radiography students achieved the prescribed competencies of a structured IPE programme. The results provide insight into ways to improve the IPE programme. A recommendation emanating from the results of this study is that, to improve the experience of all healthcare professions students, structured IPE programmes have to promote inclusive teaching and learning.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Radiography students that participate in a structured IPE programme develop competencies necessary for effective collaborative clinical practice.

Undergraduate health professions students' perceptions of athletic training students before and after an interprofessional case study program

Students pursuing careers in health professions may initially approach their training with preconceived ideas and perceptions of those who practice different health-related careers. Little research has been conducted on athletic training students and professional stereotypes or athletic training students and interprofessional education in general. Because interprofessional education may provide some positive effects on stereotypes, the goal of this study was to measure undergraduate health professions student stereotypes of athletic training students before and after an interprofessional case study program. Undergraduate nursing and public health interprofessional case study program participants assessed various relational and intrapersonal capabilities for their own professions and the athletic training profession, pre-post-program. For nursing student participants with athletic training students on their team, perceptions of their own profession and the athletic training profession significantly (p <.05) increased as compared to those with no athletic training student on their team. For public health student participants, although scores increased, no significant differences were found. Interprofessional collaborative experiences may decrease negative stereotypes of other professions, including athletic training.

COVID-19 and team-based healthcare: The essentiality of theory-driven research

There is evidence to suggest enhanced teamness, heightened interprofessional values and practices, and even the potential for dilution of occupational status hierarchies within healthcare practice and delivery during the time of COVID-19. It is essential that we study these emergent changes using the lens of multilevel theory to better understand these recent developments and their current and future implications for interprofessional practice, education, and policy. Within this article, we first offer a brief overview of secondary data to highlight these COVID-19-specific shifts to provide context and perspective. We then outline prominent micro, meso, and macro-level theories, and propose accompanying rudimentary hypotheses and related general research questions to help guide, and ideally accelerate IPE and IPCP research related to this crisis. Our goal is to not only spotlight key areas for future research during and post COVID-19 but also provide a "starter kit" to encourage more theory-driven research (and theory-expansion) in the IPE and IPCP fields.

Revealing tacit knowledge used by experienced health professionals for interprofessional collaboration

With the current interest in interprofessional collaboration in health care as a response to ever-increasing complexity of health issues and scarcity of resources, many higher education institutions are developing interprofessional education (IPE) programs. However, there has been little empirical work on what. With the current interest for interprofessional collaboration in health care ever-increasing knowledge and skills are required to work collaboratively between health professions. We have undertaken to describe interprofessional collaboration as a practice largely underpinned by tacit knowledge acquired by experienced clinicians. Clinicians from all health professions in a large francophone university in Eastern Canada were invited to participate in explicitation interviews. Explicitation interviews require participants to freely recall an interprofessional collaboration event (e.g., team meeting or joint care delivery) and describe specific actions they personally enacted. An experienced health professional encounters many interprofessional situations over time; the actions they describe reflect their personal theories about the practice. Hence, it is highly probable that they use them frequently when working with colleagues in clinical settings. Unveiled tacit knowledge was divided into four themes: the importance of a sense of belonging to a team, the imperative to meet face-to-face, the practice of soliciting the working hypotheses of colleagues, and the art of summarizing meeting discussions.

Quality of contact counts: The development of interprofessional identity in first year students

BACKGROUND

Little is known about how nursing and other healthcare students develop professional and interprofessional identities.

OBJECTIVES

This study a) measures changes in students' professional and interprofessional identities between the start and end of a faculty-wide interprofessional first year programme, and b) identifies factors influencing interprofessional identity strength at the end of the programme.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred and eight first year nursing, medicine and allied health students.

METHODS

A single-group pre-post-test design was used. Students completed an online survey at the start and end of the year-long programme. The survey comprised measures of professional and interprofessional identity, stereotypes, contact and demographics. The same survey was used twice.

RESULTS

There was a small decline in professional identity and a large decline in interprofessional identity across the year. Nursing students, the only group involved in clinical practicums, were exempt from the large fall in interprofessional identity. Quality of contact with students from other professions and autostereotypes about own profession were predictors of interprofessional identity strength at the end of the programme, consistent with intergroup contact theory.

CONCLUSIONS

Introductory interprofessional education programmes should include opportunities for quality contact with students from other professions, and for students to develop a clear understanding of their own profession.