Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia Risk in Hemodialysis Patients Using the Buttonhole Cannulation Technique: A Prospective Multicenter Study

Cannulation Technique of Vascular Access in Hemodialysis and the Impact on the Arteriovenous Fistula Survival: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Adequate cannulation technique (CT) methods and successful puncture are essential for hemodialysis (HD) and arteriovenous fistula (AVF) maintenance. This systematic review and meta-analysis was designed to identify which CT allows better AVF primary patency and lower rates of complications in HD patients. The search was carried out on the CINAHL, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Joanna Briggs Institute Library databases to identify all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing clinical outcomes of buttonhole (BH) versus rope ladder cannulation (RL) from 2010 to 2022. The Risk-of-Bias (Rob 2) tool was used for RCTs and the ROBINS-I was used for non-randomized studies. RevMan 5.4 was used for the meta-analysis. A total of five RCTs, one quasi-randomized controlled trial, and six observational studies were included. When compared with RL cannulation, BH cannulation significantly increased bacteremia (RR, 2.76, 95% CI (1.14, 6.67), p = 0.02) but showed no differences in AVF primary patency (HR, 1.06, 95% CI (0.45, 4.21), p = 0.90). There was no thrombosis reduction (RR, 0.51, 95% CI (0.23, 1.14), p = 0.10) or intervention number reduction (RR, 0.93, 95% CI (0.49, 1.80), p = 0.84) with BH. Outcomes like pain, hematoma, and aneurism could not be merged due to a lack of data, reported as medians, as well as due to different definitions. The quality in general was poor and the heterogeneity among the studies prevented us from merging the outcomes.

Evaluation of Clinical Approach and Outcomes Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia

Objective

Despite appropriate treatment and early diagnosis methods, Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) is still associated with a high mortality rate. This study aims to evaluate the clinical features and approaches to SAB and to analyze the parameters that may affect 7-day and 30-day mortality.

Materials and Methods

Adult patients with SAB data between 2011 and 2018 were evaluated retrospectively. Clinical data, patient demographics, and 7-day and 30-day mortality rates were obtained from their medical records.

Results

In total, 144 patients were included in the study; 57.6% (83/144) of patients were men, and the mean age was 65.2±16.5 years. The most common source of infection was the central-line catheter (38.9%), followed by intra-abdominal (21%), respiratory (16.7), infective endocarditis (5.6%), and osteoarticular foci (2.1%). Fifteen percent (15%) of the strains were methicillin resistant. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) was performed for 80.6% (116/144) patients. Infectious diseases specialist consultation within 96 hours from blood culture signal was requested in 79.9%. Overall, 7-day mortality was 11.8%, and 30-day mortality was 21.5%. Staying in intensive care units (ICU) increased the risk of 30-day mortality by 1.1 times, and respiratory-focused SAB increased the risk by 4.3 times.

Conclusion

SAB is still a big threat. Staphylococcal pneumonia remains a severe infection. Several prognostic factors influence mortality. Identifying the source, ensuring source control, and appropriate initial therapy as soon as possible are critical for reducing mortality and morbidity in SAB.

How to choose the appropriate cannulation technique for vascular access in hemodialysis patients

The cannulation technique is important for the survival of the arteriovenous access. Choosing the appropriate technique is a complex decision. Such choice must be customized to patients, considering their characteristics, the type of arteriovenous access and the experience of the hemodialysis team. We describe seven items that can help nurses to identify the appropriate cannulation technique: type of arteriovenous access; drainage vein; hygienic self-care profile; experience of the nursing staff in the cannulation technique and nurse-to-patient ratio; hemodialysis treatment method; patient's condition; and patient's decision. Such items can help nurses in decision-making on the "ideal" cannulation technique for each patient.

Direction- and Angle-Assisted Buttonhole Cannulation of Arteriovenous Fistula in Hemodialysis Patients: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

Arteriovenous fistula cannulation with the buttonhole technique is often preferred by patients but has been associated with an increased infection risk. Guidelines disagree on whether it should be abandoned, thus we assessed a technologically simple method to facilitate gentler arteriovenous fistula cannulation with potentially less discomfort and damage to the epithelial lining of the buttonhole tract.

STUDY DESIGN

8-week, prospective, open-label, randomized controlled trial.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

Patients with buttonhole tracts receiving hemodialysis at 7 dialysis centers in Norway were randomized to the intervention group (43 patients, 658 cannulations) or control group (40 patients, 611 cannulations).

INTERVENTION

Direction and angle of the established buttonhole tract were marked on the forearm skin in the intervention group, whereas the control group had no structured cannulation information system.

OUTCOMES

The primary outcome was successful cannulation, defined as correct placement of both blunt needles at the first attempt without needing to change needles, perform extra perforations, or reposition the needle. The secondary outcomes were patient-reported difficulty of cannulation (verbal rating scale: 1 = very easy, 6 = impossible) and intensity of pain (numeric rating scale: 0 = no pain, 10 = unbearable pain).

RESULTS

After a 2-week run-in period, successful cannulation was achieved in 73.9% and 74.8% of the patients in the intervention and control groups, respectively (relative risk [RR], 0.99; 95% CI, 0.87-1.12; P = 0.85). However, the probability of a difficult arterial cannulation (verbal rating scale, 3-6) was significantly lower in the intervention group (RR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.55-0.85; P = 0.001). There were no improvements for venous cannulations. Furthermore, the probability of a painful cannulation (numeric rating scale, 3-10) was lower in the intervention group (RR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.51-1.02; P = 0.06).

LIMITATIONS

Unable to evaluate hard end points such as infections and thrombosis owing to the small sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

Marking direction and angle of cannulation did not improve cannulation success rates; however, patients more often reported an unproblematic procedure and less pain.

FUNDING

None.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01536548).

A comparison of the buttonhole and rope-ladder AVF cannulation techniques and infection rates within the SCOPE collaborative

BACKGROUND

Studies regarding hemodialysis (HD) arteriovenous fistula (AVF) cannulation in adults indicate a higher risk of infection with the buttonhole (BH) technique compared to the rope-ladder (RL) technique. Pediatric data on this issue is sparse.

METHODS

We compared infection rates within the Standardizing Care to Improve Outcomes in Pediatric End stage kidney disease (SCOPE) centers performing BH cannulation versus RL cannulation of AVF. Generalized linear mixed modeling was used to assess differences in access-related blood stream infection (BSI) and access site infection (ASI) rates between the centers.

RESULTS

Data was available from 211 AVF enrollments among 210 children. There were 61 AVF enrollments at 6 BH centers and 150 enrollments at 13 RL centers. Demographics were similar between the two groups. There were 12 total infections in 3383 patient months. BH centers had 3 infections (0 BSI, 3 ASI) and RL centers had 9 infections (5 BSI, 3 ASI). Mean [95% confidence interval] infection rates per 1000 patient months were not different between BH and RL centers (BH: 3.1 [0.6,15.6], RL: 3.2 [1.3,9.4], p = 0.947). A survey was also completed by the BH centers to describe their BH practices. The BH procedure at the majority of sites was characterized by a small patient/nurse ratio and strict antiseptic protocols.

CONCLUSIONS

This data provides evidence of a low BSI rate associated with BH cannulation in pediatric HD patients. Further studies are needed to better delineate the differences in the pediatric and adult experience with the BH cannulation technique.

Essentials of Vascular Access for Home Hemodialysis

Hemodialysis (HD) at home has gained increasing popularity in recent years because of regulatory and financial issues. Creation and maintenance of a well-functioning, cannulatable vascular access is essential for performance of home HD (HHD). A vascular access team-based approach to creation, maintenance, and troubleshooting of vascular access can facilitate removing barriers to cannulation at home related to fear of pain and bleeding associated with large bore needles. Frequent cannulation of HD access is associated with more frequent access complications, especially infections. Thus, proper cannulation of arteriovenous access requires careful training of rope ladder and buttonhole techniques to avoid infectious and traumatic complications that can lead to dire consequences. Development of better methods of creating buttonholes and single needles for dialysis can facilitate HHD. A culture of self-cannulation at dialysis centers can also promote HHD.

Relationship between arteriovenous fistula cannulation practices and dialysis adequacy: A prospective, multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Successful arteriovenous fistula cannulation ensures maximum patient benefit in the haemodialysis procedure.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of various cannulation methods used for arteriovenous fistulas on dialysis adequacy.

DESIGN

It is a descriptive, cross-sectional and multicenter study.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 164 dialysis patients from four dialysis centers were included.

MEASUREMENTS

Data were collected by determining patients' characteristics and the arteriovenous fistula cannulation method used, in addition to recording the Kt/V and urea reduction ratio values to evaluate dialysis adequacy. The mean Kt/V and urea reduction ratio values over 3 months after dialysis initiation were used. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04270292.

RESULTS

Cannulation with the puncture method was used in 53% of the patients; the fistula needles were inserted in the antegrade direction in 43.9% of the patients; the arterial needle was rotated after fistula needle placement in 63.4% of the patients; and the arterial and venous needles were on the same vascular line in 15.2% of the patients. Placement of the fistula needle in the antegrade direction increased the Kt/V value 0.164 times (95% confidence interval: 0.002-0.212, p = .047).

CONCLUSION

Antegrade placement could be a factor influencing dialysis adequacy. We suggest antegrade interventions to the fistula to maximize the patient benefit from the haemodialysis treatment.

Should Buttonhole Cannulation of Arteriovenous Fistulas Be Used? Moderator Commentary

Podcast

This article contains a podcast at https://www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/K360/2020_05_28_K3602020000168.mp3