Serum Phosphorus Level Rises in US Hemodialysis Patients Over the Past Decade: A DOPPS Special Report

Efficacy and safety of tenapanor in end-stage renal disease patients with hyperphosphatemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Hyperphosphatemia occurs universally in end-stage renal disease(ESRD), and the attainment of target serum phosphate levels remains suboptimal with currently available phosphate binders. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tenapanor in end-stage renal disease patients with hyperphosphatemia.

METHODS

Data sources included PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. This meta-analysis included randomized controlled trials evaluating both the efficacy of tenapanor in reducing serum phosphate levels and its safety profile. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool for RCTs. The GRADE system was used to assess the overall certainty of evidence. A meta-analysis was carried out by using fixed effects (I2 values < 50%) or random effects (I2 values ≥ 50%) models to calculate MD with 95% CI for continuous outcome variables and RR with 95% CI for dichotomous variables. Publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots.

RESULTS

A total of seven RCTs involving 877 individuals were included. The pooling analysis demonstrates that the reduction in mean serum phosphorus levels in the tenapanor group was significantly greater than that in the placebo group [MD= -1.06 mg/dl, 95% CI (-1.59, -0.53); I2 = 83%, p < 0.0001]. The proportion of patients achieving a serum phosphorus level of < 5.5 mg/dL, along with the incidence of any adverse events (AEs) and gastrointestinal disorders, was higher in the tenapanor group compared to the placebo group.

CONCLUSION

Tenapanor has the potential to significantly reduce serum phosphorus levels and enhance the rate of achieving target levels compared to placebo, all while maintaining an acceptable safety and tolerability profile.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO registration number CRD42024544531.

Tenapanor: A Phosphate Absorption Inhibitor for the Management of Hyperphosphatemia in Patients With Kidney Failure

Because of increased risks of cardiovascular disease and death, patients with hyperphosphatemia receiving maintenance dialysis are advised to limit phosphorus consumption and are prescribed phosphate binders in an effort to better control serum phosphate concentrations. Because of large pill size, pill burden, and tolerability issues, phosphate binder adherence is relatively poor. On ingestion, phosphate is absorbed from the intestine via transcellular or paracellular transport. Data show that inhibiting sodium-hydrogen exchanger 3 modulates paracellular phosphate absorption (the predominant pathway in humans). Tenapanor is a first-in-class, minimally absorbed, phosphate absorption inhibitor that selectively inhibits sodium-hydrogen exchanger 3, with a mechanism distinct from, and complementary to, that of phosphate binders. In phase 3 and postregistrational studies, tenapanor conferred statistically significant and clinically meaningful reductions in serum phosphate in patients receiving maintenance dialysis with hyperphosphatemia. Here, we review the available preclinical and clinical data on the effects of tenapanor on controlling intestinal phosphate absorption.

Hyperphosphatemia in Chronic Kidney Disease: The Search for New Treatment Paradigms and the Role of Tenapanor

Hyperphosphataemia represents a significant challenge in the management of chronic kidney disease, exerting a pronounced influence on the pathogenesis of cardiovascular complications and mineral bone disorders. Traditional approaches to address hyperphosphataemia involve implementing dietary phosphate restrictions, administering phosphate binders, and, in cases of end-stage renal disease, resorting to dialysis. Unfortunately, these interventions frequently prove inadequate in maintaining phosphate levels within recommended ranges. Additionally, commonly employed pharmacological agents are not immune to eliciting adverse events, thereby limiting their prescription and therapeutic adherence. There is a growing focus on exploring novel therapeutic strategies in this context. The current discussion centres on tenapanor, a pharmacological agent predominantly acting as a selective inhibitor of sodium/hydrogen exchanger isoform 3 (NHE3). Its mechanism of action involves modulating tight junctions, resulting in reduced sodium absorption and intestinal paracellular permeability to phosphate. Furthermore, tenapanor downregulates sodium-dependent phosphate 2b transport protein (NaPi2b) expression, thereby impeding active transcellular phosphate transport. Clinical trials have elucidated the efficacy and safety profile of tenapanor. This evidence hints at a potential paradigm shift in the management of hyperphosphataemia. However, the burgeoning optimism surrounding tenapanor warrants tempered enthusiasm, as further research remains indispensable. The imperative lies in meticulously delineating its efficacy and safety contours within the crucible of clinical practice. In this review, we synthesize the intricate interplay between hyperphosphataemia and Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral Bone Disorder, and we discuss the existing pharmacological interventions for hyperphosphataemia and explore emerging treatment paradigms that offer novel perspectives in managing elevated phosphate levels in CKD patients.

Tenapanor as Therapy for Hyperphosphatemia in Maintenance Dialysis Patients: Results from the OPTIMIZE Study

Key Points

Tenapanor, a first-in-class local inhibitor of sodium/hydrogen exchanger isoform 3, acts as a phosphate absorption inhibitor by decreasing paracellular phosphate absorption. Tenapanor alone or with phosphate binders achieved P ≤ 5.5 mg/dl over 10 weeks in 34%–38% of patients taking phosphate binders at baseline. Tenapanor can help adults with CKD on maintenance dialysis achieve normal serum phosphate concentrations.

Background

OPTIMIZE was a randomized, open-label study evaluating different tenapanor initiation methods. OPTIMIZE evaluated tenapanor alone and in combination with phosphate binders (PBs) to achieve target serum phosphate (P) ≤5.5 mg/dl.

Methods

Patients with inadequately controlled P receiving maintenance dialysis from 42 US locations who were taking PBs with baseline P > 5.5 mg/dl and ≤ 10.0 mg/dl, or were PB-naive with baseline P > 4.5 mg/dl and ≤ 10.0 mg/dl, were included in OPTIMIZE. Participants taking PBs at baseline were randomized to switch from PBs to tenapanor (Straight Switch ; n =151) or reduce PB dosage by ≥50% and add tenapanor (Binder Reduction ; n =152); PB-naive patients started tenapanor alone (Binder-Naive ; n =30). Participants received tenapanor 30 mg twice a day for 10 weeks (part A), followed by an elective, 16-week open-label extension (part B). Outcomes included changes from baseline in P, intact fibroblast growth factor 23, parathyroid hormone, serum calcium, and medication burden; patient-reported outcomes; and safety.

Results

By part A end point, 34.4% (Straight Switch ), 38.2% (Binder Reduction ), and 63.3% (Binder-Naive ) of patients achieved P ≤ 5.5 mg/dl. Mean P reduction and median pill burden reduction from baseline to part A end point were 0.91±1.7 mg/dl and 4 pills/d for the Straight Switch and 0.99±1.8 mg/dl and 1 pill/d for the Binder Reduction group. The mean P reduction for Binder-Naive patients was 0.87±1.5 mg/dl. Among Straight Switch and Binder Reduction patients who completed patient experience questionnaires, 205 of 243 (84.4%) reported an improved phosphate management routine. Diarrhea was the most common adverse event (133 of 333 [39.9%]).

Conclusions

Tenapanor as monotherapy or in combination with PBs effectively lowered P toward the target range in patients who were PB-naive or who were not at goal despite PB use.

Clinical Trial registration number

NCT04549597 .

Oh, My Gut! New insights on the role of the gastrointestinal tract and the gut microbiome in chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this review is to highlight recent evidence on the role of the gastrointestinal tract and gut microbiome on chronic kidney disease-mineral bone disorder (CKD-MBD) outcomes, including intestinal phosphorus absorption and sensing, and the effect of gut-oriented therapies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent evidence has revealed a complex interplay among mineral metabolism and novel gut-related factors, including paracellular intestinal phosphate absorption, the gut microbiome, and the immune system, prompting a reevaluation of treatment approaches for CKD-MBD. The inhibition of NHE3 limits phosphate transport in the intestine and may lead to changes in the gut microbiome. A study in rats with CKD showed that the supplementation of the fermentable dietary inulin delayed CKD-MBD, lowering circulating phosphorus and parathyroid hormone, reducing bone remodeling and improving cortical parameters, and lowering cardiovascular calcifications. In non-CKD preclinical studies, probiotics and prebiotics improved bone formation mediated through the effect of butyrate facilitating the differentiation of T cells into Tregs, and Tregs stimulating the osteogenic Wnt10b, and butyrate was also necessary for the parathyroid hormone (PTH) bone effects.

SUMMARY

Recent findings support multiple possible roles for gut-oriented therapies in addressing CKD-MBD prevention and management that should be further explored through clinical and translational studies.

Managing Phosphate Burden in Patients Receiving Dialysis: Beyond Phosphate Binders and Diet

Most patients receiving dialysis rely on dietary restriction and phosphate binders to minimize the risk of hyperphosphatemia, which is associated with increased mortality. However, dietary restriction is difficult because of hidden phosphate additives in processed foods and medications. Restriction of dietary phosphate sources such as protein may increase the risk of malnutrition. Phosphate binders, the only pharmacologic option for phosphate management since aluminum salts were introduced several decades ago, are often insufficient for binding the 1400-2500 mg of phosphate potentially consumed daily. Over the last decade, serum phosphate levels in the United States have risen, and >69% of patients receiving dialysis exhibited a most recent phosphate level >4.5 mg/dl (above the normal range), indicating an urgent need for new, more effective therapies to manage phosphate burden. Novel, nonbinder therapies such as transcellular and paracellular phosphate absorption inhibitors may be used for phosphate management, and future studies should examine whether they allow fewer dietary restrictions for patients receiving dialysis, potentially improving patient quality of life and nutritional status. It is imperative that we collaborate to move beyond the restrictive approaches available today and provide patients and clinicians with an array of strategies so that they may choose the most appropriate patient-centered therapy.