Comparison of Cellular Monolayers and an Artificial Membrane as Absorptive Membranes in the in vitro Lipolysis-permeation Assay

In Vitro Digestion-In Situ Absorption Setup Employing a Physiologically Relevant Value of the Membrane Surface Area/Volume Ratio for Evaluating Performance of Lipid-Based Formulations: A Comparative Study with an In Vitro Digestion-Permeation Model

The aim of this study is to establish and test an in vitro digestion-in situ absorption model that can mimic in vivo drug flux by employing a physiologically relevant value of the membrane surface area (S)/volume (V) ratio for accurate prediction of oral drug absorption from lipid-based formulations (LBFs). Three different types of LBFs (Type IIIA-MC, Type IIIA-LC, and Type IV) loaded with cinnarizine (CNZ), a lipophilic weak base with borderline permeability, and a control suspension were prepared. Subsequently, a simultaneous in vitro digestion-permeation experiment was conducted using a side-by-side diffusion cell with a dialysis membrane having a low S/V value. During digestion, CNZ partially precipitated for Type IV, while it remained solubilized in the aqueous phase for Type IIIA-MC and Type IIIA-LC in the donor compartment. However, in vitro drug fluxes for Type IIIA-MC and Type IIIA-LC were lower than those for Type IV due to the reduced free fraction of CNZ in the donor compartment. In pharmacokinetic studies, a similar improvement in in vivo oral exposure relative to suspension was observed, regardless of the LBFs used. Consequently, a poor correlation was found between in vitro permeation and areas under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUCoral) (R2 = 0.087). A luminal concentration measurement study revealed that this discrepancy was attributed to the extremely high absorption rate of CNZ in the gastrointestinal tract compared to that across a dialysis membrane evaluated by the in vitro digestion-permeation model, i.e., the absorption of CNZ in vivo was completed regardless of the extent of the free fraction, owing to the rapid removal of CNZ from the intestine. Subsequently, we aimed to predict the oral absorption of CNZ from the same formulations using a model that demonstrated high drug flux by employing the physiologically relevant S/V value and rat jejunum segment as an absorption sink (for replicating in vivo intestinal permeability). Predigested formulations were injected into the rat intestinal loop, and AUCloop values were calculated from the plasma concentration-time profiles. A better correlation was found between AUCloop and AUCoral (R2 = 0.72), although AUCloop underestimated AUCoral for Type IV due to the precipitation of CNZ during the predigestion process. However, this result indicated the importance of mimicking the in vivo drug absorption rate in the predictive model. The method presented herein is valuable for the development of LBFs.

Enabling superior drug loading in lipid-based formulations with lipophilic salts for a brick dust molecule: Exploration of lipophilic counterions and in vitro-in vivo evaluation

Lipid-based formulations (LbFs) are an extensively used approach for oral delivery of poorly soluble drug compounds in the form of lipid suspension and lipid solution. However, the high target dose and inadequate lipid solubility limit the potential of brick dust molecules to be formulated as LbFs. Thus, the complexation of such molecules with a lipophilic counterion can be a plausible approach to improve the solubility in lipid-based solutions via reducing drug crystallinity and polar surface area. The study aimed to enhance drug loading in lipid solution for Nilotinib (Nil) through complexation or salt formation with different lipophilic counterions. We synthesized different lipophilic salts/ complexes via metathesis reactions and confirmed their formation by 1H NMR and FTIR. Docusate-based lipophilic salt showed improved solubility in medium-chain triglycerides (∼7 to 7.5-fold) and long-chain triglycerides (∼30 to 35-fold) based lipids compared to unformulated crystalline Nil. The increased lipid solubility could be attributed to the reduction in drug crystallinity which was further confirmed by the PXRD and DSC. Prototype LbFs were prepared to evaluate drug loading and their physicochemical characteristics. The findings suggested that structural features of counterion including chain length and lipophilicity affect the drug loading in LbF. In addition, physical stability testing of formulations was performed, inferring that aliphatic sulfate-based LbFs were stable with no sign of drug precipitation or salt disproportionation. An in vitro lipolysis-permeation study revealed that the primary driver of absorptive flux is the solubilization of the drug and reduced amount of lipid. Further, the in vivo characterization was conducted to measure the influence of increased drug load on oral bioavailability. Overall, the results revealed enhanced absorption of lipophilic salt-based LbF over unformulated crystalline Nil and conventional LbF (drug load equivalent to equilibrium solubility) which supports the idea that lipophilic salt-based LbF enhances drug loading, and supersaturation-mediated drug solubilization, unlocking the full potential of LbF.

Estimation of the concentration boundary layer adjacent to a flat surface using computational fluid dynamics

Dissolution-permeation (D/P) experiments are widely used during preclinical development due to producing results with better predictability than traditional monophasic experiments. However, it is difficult to compare absorption across in vitro setups given the propensity to only report apparent permeability. We therefore developed an approach to predict the concentration boundary layer for any D/P device by using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). The Navier-Stokes and continuity equation in 2D were solved numerically in MATLAB and by finite element methods in COMSOL v6.1 to predict the momentum [Formula: see text] and concentration ηg boundary layer for a flow over a flat plate, i.e. the classical Blasius boundary layer flow. A MATLAB algorithm was developed to calculate the edge of either boundary layer. The methodology to determine the concentration boundary layer based on Blasius's analysis provided an accurate estimate for both [Formula: see text] and ηg, resulting in, [Formula: see text] , at high Schmidt numbers (Sc ∼ 1000) within 14 % of the Blasius solution and 6.6 % of the accepted Schmidt number correlation ( [Formula: see text] ). The methodology based on the Blasius analysis of the concentration boundary layer using velocity and concentration profiles computed using CFD presented herein will enable characterization/analysis of complex D/P apparatuses used in preclinical development, where an analytical solution may not be available.

Exploring the use of modified in vitro digestion assays for the evaluation of ritonavir loaded solid lipid-based formulations

Solid lipid-based formulations (sLBFs) have the potential to increase the oral bioavailability of drugs with poor solubility in water, while counteracting some of the disadvantages of liquid LBFs. The most common experimental set-up to study the performance of LBFs in vitro is the lipolysis assay, during which the LBFs are digested by lipases in an environment mimicking the human small intestine. However, this assay has failed in many cases to correctly predict the performance of LBFs in vivo, highlighting the need for new and improved in vitro assays to evaluate LBFs at the preclinical stage. In this study, the suitability of three different in vitro digestion assays for the evaluation of sLBFs was assessed; the classic one-step intestinal digestion assay, a two-step gastrointestinal digestion assay and a bicompartmental assay permitting the simultaneous monitoring of digestion and permeation of the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) across an artificial membrane (Lecithin in Dodecane - LiDo). Three sLBFs (M1-M3) with varied composition and ritonavir as model drug were prepared and examined. When comparing the ability of these formulations to keep the drug solubilized in the aqueous phase, all three assays show that M1 performs better, while M3 presents poor performance. However, the classic in vitro intestinal digestion assay fails to provide a clear ranking of the three formulations, something that is more evident when using the two modified and more physiologically relevant assays. Also, the two modified assays provide additional information about the performance of the formulations including the performance in the gastric environment and intestinal flux of the drug. These modified in vitro digestion assays are valuable tools for the development and evaluation of sLBFs to make better informed decisions of which formulations to pursue for in vivo studies.

Leveraging the use of in vitro and computational methods to support the development of enabling oral drug products: An InPharma commentary

Due to the strong tendency towards poorly soluble drugs in modern development pipelines, enabling drug formulations such as amorphous solid dispersions, cyclodextrins, co-crystals and lipid-based formulations are frequently applied to solubilize or generate supersaturation in gastrointestinal fluids, thus enhancing oral drug absorption. Although many innovative in vitro and in silico tools have been introduced in recent years to aid development of enabling formulations, significant knowledge gaps still exist with respect to how best to implement them. As a result, the development strategy for enabling formulations varies considerably within the industry and many elements of empiricism remain. The InPharma network aims to advance a mechanistic, animal-free approach to the assessment of drug developability. This commentary focuses current status and next steps that will be taken in InPharma to identify and fully utilize 'best practice' in vitro and in silico tools for use in physiologically based biopharmaceutic models.