Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome

Acute cholangitis: a state-of-the-art review

Acute cholangitis is a potentially life-threatening bacterial infection of the intra and/or extrahepatic bile ducts. It remains the second and third cause of community-acquired and hospital-acquired bacteremia, respectively, and is associated with mortality rates of up to 15%, despite advances in broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy and improved access to emergency biliary tract decompression procedures. Even though not much has changed in recent years in terms of diagnosis or treatment, new data have emerged regarding multidrug-resistant bacteria that serve as etiologic agents of cholangitis. Moreover, different approaches in antibiotic regimes depending on severity grading and bile sample cultures as well as novel minimally invasive endoscopic procedures that can help when consecrated treatments such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) fail, cannot be performed, or are unavailable have been proposed. This state-of-the-art review aims to offer a complete and updated assessment of the epidemiology, novel diagnostic and therapeutic methods, complications, and prognostic variables of acute cholangitis. The authors will review the prognostic implications of unusual complications, the relevance of regular bile samples and antibiograms, and their new role in guiding antibiotic therapy and limiting antibiotic resistance to present an organized and comprehensive approach to the care of acute cholangitis.

Effect of Immunosuppressive Therapy on the Occurrence of Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome in Renal Transplant Recipients

Background

Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS), a rare thrombotic microangiopathy, is characterized by hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and acute renal failure. Caused by genetic mutations in the alternative complement cascade, aHUS often will culminate in end-stage renal disease and occasionally death. Renal transplantation in aHUS patients has been contraindicated in the past due to the recurrence risk, with certain immunosuppressive regimens being commonly attributed. In this study, we analyzed the association between aHUS and immunosuppressive agents so as to offer evidence for the use of certain immunosuppressive regimens in renal transplant recipients.

Material/Methods

Our study is a retrospective analysis using data from the United States Renal Data System from 2004 to 2012. A cohort of renal transplantation patients diagnosed with aHUS were identified to include in the study. The primary endpoint was the determination of aHUS incidence in renal transplant recipients due to various immunosuppressive agents. The secondary endpoints were to check the relationship between the drug type as well as the demographic variables that increase the risk for aHUS.

Results

It was found that there was a higher usage of sirolimus (P=0.015) and corticosteroids (P=0.030) in the aHUS patients compared to patients in other diagnoses group.

Conclusions

There was a higher usage of sirolimus and corticosteroids in renal transplantation patients diagnosed with aHUS. Unfortunately, due to the rarity of this disease, the sample size was small (n=14). Despite the small sample size, this data analysis throws light on the relationship between aHUS and immunosuppressive agents in renal transplant recipients, although we still have much to learn.

Routine use of clinical exome-based next-generation sequencing for evaluation of patients with thrombotic microangiopathies

Next-generation sequencing is increasingly used for clinical evaluation of patients presenting with thrombotic microangiopathies because it allows for simultaneous interrogation of multiple complement and coagulation pathway genes known to be associated with disease. However, the diagnostic yield is undefined in routine clinical practice. Historic studies relied on case-control cohorts, did not apply current guidelines for variant pathogenicity assessment, and used targeted gene enrichment combined with next-generation sequencing. A clinically enhanced exome, targeting ~54 Mb, was sequenced for 73 patients. Variant analysis and interpretation were performed on genes with biological relevance in thrombotic microangiopathy (C3,CD46, CFB, CFH, CFI, DGKE, and THBD). CFHR3-CFHR1 deletion status was also assessed using multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. Variants were classified using American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines. We identified 5 unique novel and 14 unique rare variants in 25% (18/73) of patients, including a total of 5 pathogenic, 4 likely pathogenic, and 15 variants of uncertain clinical significance. Nine patients had homozygous deletions in CFHR3-CFHR1. The diagnostic yield, defined as the presence of a pathogenic variant, likely pathogenic variant or homozygous deletion of CFHR3-CFHR1, was 25% for all patients tested. Variants of uncertain clinical significance were identified in 21% (15/73) of patients.These results illustrate the expected diagnositic yield in the setting of thrombotic microangiopathies through the application of standardized variant interpretation, and highlight the utility of such an approach. Sequencing a clinically enhanced exome to enable targeted, disease-specific variant analysis is a viable approach. The moderate rate of variants of uncertain clinical significance highlights the paucity of data surrounding the variants in our cohort and illustrates the need for expanded variant curation resources to aid in thrombotic microangiopathy-related disease variant classification.

Expert Statements on the Standard of Care in Critically Ill Adult Patients With Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome

A typical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) presents similarly to thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) and other causes or conditions with thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA), such as disseminated intravascular coagulation or sepsis. Similarity in clinical presentation may hinder diagnosis and optimal treatment selection in the urgent setting in the ICU. However, there is currently no consensus on the diagnosis or treatment of aHUS for ICU specialists. This review aims to summarize available data on the diagnosis and treatment strategies of aHUS in the ICU to enhance the understanding of aHUS diagnosis and outcomes in patients managed in the ICU. To this end, a review of the recent literature (January 2009-March 2016) was performed to select the most relevant articles for ICU physicians. Based on the paucity of adult aHUS cases overall and within the ICU, no specific recommendations could be formally graded for the critical care setting. However, we recognize a core set of skills required by intensivists for diagnosing and managing patients with aHUS: recognizing thrombotic microangiopathies, differentiating aHUS from related conditions, recognizing involvement of other organ systems, understanding the pathophysiology of aHUS, knowing the diagnostic workup and relevant outcomes in critically ill patients with aHUS, and knowing the standard of care for patients with aHUS based on available data and guidelines. In conclusion, managing critically ill patients with aHUS requires basic skills that, in the absence of sufficient data from patients treated within the ICU, can be gleaned from an increasingly relevant literature outside the ICU. More data on critically ill patients with aHUS are needed to validate these conclusions within the ICU setting.