Topiramate in clinical practice: long-term experience in patients with refractory epilepsy referred to a tertiary epilepsy center

Gastrointestinal and eating problems in SCN1A-related seizure disorders

OBJECTIVE

Our study aimed to describe the prevalence and characteristics of gastrointestinal and eating problems in Dravet syndrome (DS) and other SCN1A-related seizure disorders and to determine the association between the occurrence of gastrointestinal and eating problems and core features of DS.

METHODS

Gastrointestinal and eating problems were assessed with a questionnaire in a Dutch cohort of participants with an SCN1A-related seizure disorder. Associations between the number of gastrointestinal and eating problems and core features of DS, seizure severity, level of intellectual disability, impaired mobility, behavioral problems, and use of anti-seizure medication, were explored by multivariate ordinal regression analyses. Symptoms were divided into the categories dysphagia-related, behavioral, and gastrointestinal, and were assessed separately.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty-nine participants with an SCN1A-related seizure disorder, of whom 118 (69.8%) with DS and 51 (30.2%) with Generalized Epilepsy with Febrile Seizures Plus / Febrile Seizures (GEFS+/FS), the non-DS phenotype, were evaluated. Gastrointestinal and eating problems were highly prevalent in DS participants, 50.8% had more than three symptoms compared to 3.9% of non-DS participants. Of participants with DS, 17.8% were fully or partly fed by a gastric tube. Within the three different symptom categories, the most prevalent dysphagia-related symptom was drooling (60.7%), distraction during mealtimes (61.4%) the most prevalent behavioral symptom, and constipation and loss of appetite (both 50.4%) the most prevalent gastrointestinal symptoms. DS participants who use a wheelchair (odds ratio (OR) 4.9 95%CI (1.9-12.8) compared to walking without aid), who use ≥3 anti-seizure medications (ASM) (OR 5.9 95%CI (1.9-18.2) compared to <3 ASM) and who have behavioral problems (OR 3.0 95%CI (1.1-8.1) compared to no behavioral problems) had more gastrointestinal and eating problems.

CONCLUSION

Gastrointestinal and eating problems are frequently reported symptoms in DS. Distinguishing between symptom categories will lead to tailored management of patients at risk, will improve early detection, and enable a timely referral to a dietitian, behavioral expert, and/or speech therapist, ultimately aiming to improve the quality of life of both patients and caregivers.

The who, what, when and why of cognitive difficulties in epilepsy

Cognitive complaints are very common in people diagnosed with epilepsy. These difficulties are often another manifestation of the same pathology responsible for seizures. They can be further exacerbated by treatments aimed at seizure control. Other common comorbidities of epilepsy such as low mood and elevated anxiety can also contribute to cognitive complaints. There is surprisingly little overlap between memory complaints and performance on formal memory tests in this population. This article examines the multifactorial and heterogeneous nature of cognitive difficulties in epilepsy and makes the case for the provision of basic psychoeducation as the foundation for all interventions aimed at ameliorating these difficulties in this patient population.

Topiramate decreases the salience of motivationally relevant visual cues among smokers with alcohol use disorder

BACKGROUND

There is preliminary evidence that the anticonvulsant topiramate increases the likelihood of both smoking and alcohol abstinence among smokers with alcohol use disorder (AUD), but its therapeutic mechanism has not been determined. We used event-related potentials (ERPs) to evaluate topiramate's effect on the salience of drug-related, emotional, and neutral pictorial cues to identify whether one of its potential therapeutic mechanisms involves reduction of the salience of motivationally relevant cues.

METHODS

Participants enrolled in a multisite clinical trial treating smokers with AUD were randomly assigned to receive placebo, low-dose topiramate (up to 125 mg/day), or high-dose topiramate (up to 250 mg/day), along with brief behavioral compliance enhancement treatment. A subsample (n = 101) completed ERP assessments at baseline (1 week pre-medication) and week 5 (5 weeks on medication; 1 week pre-quit). We assessed the salience of pleasant, unpleasant, cigarette-related, alcohol-related, and neutral pictorial cues using the late positive potential (LPP) ERP component and measured self-reported substance use, reinforcement, craving, and withdrawal.

RESULTS

Five weeks of high-dose topiramate treatment decreased LPP amplitudes in response to both emotional (pleasant and unpleasant) and drug-related cues (alcohol and cigarette), but not to neutral cues. However, results showed that the LPPs were not significant mediators of the relationship between topiramate dose and post-quit measures of substance use, reinforcement, craving, or withdrawal.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that high-dose topiramate (up to 250 mg/day) decreases the motivational salience of both drug-related and emotional cues among smokers with AUD. However, the nonsignificant mediation analyses preclude any firm conclusions about whether this effect represents one of topiramate's therapeutic mechanisms of action.

Effectiveness of dose-escalated topiramate monotherapy and add-on therapy in neurosurgery-related epilepsy: A prospective study

BACKGROUND

Lesional and symptomatic causes of epilepsy are the most common neurological disorders of the brain. Topiramate effectively controls newly diagnosed epilepsy and refractory focal seizures, but high-dose topiramate does not improve seizure control. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of dose-escalated topiramate as first-line monotherapy and add-on therapy in patients with neurosurgery-related epilepsy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 55 neurosurgical patients with epilepsy were divided into monotherapy and add-on therapy groups and both groups received topiramate via the dose-escalation method. The primary efficacy outcomes were seizure-free rate and seizure response rate. Adverse events and seizure frequency were recorded.

RESULTS

The seizure response rate in the first month of monotherapy was significantly better than that of add-on therapy (89% vs 65%, P < .05), but no significant differences were found in seizure response rates between the 2 groups after 2 months of treatment. Both monotherapy and add-on therapy were effective in controlling seizures, with mean seizure frequency of 0.725 vs 0.536 and seizure-free rate of 88% vs 78.6%. Both treatments showed good improvement of seizure frequency in patients without tumor. The efficacy of monotherapy was better than that of add-on therapy (80% vs 29.2%) in patients with body mass index (BMI) ≤24. However, add-on therapy was better than monotherapy (76.7% vs 21.4%) in patients with BMI > 24. Dizziness (25.5%) and headache (16.4%) were the most common adverse events. No severe adverse event such as cognitive impairment was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Dose-escalated topiramate monotherapy and add-on therapy demonstrate good efficacy and safety, with fewer adverse events in seizure control in neurosurgical patients.

Severity of Topiramate-Related Working Memory Impairment Is Modulated by Plasma Concentration and Working Memory Capacity

Drug side effects that impair cognition can lead to diminished quality of life and discontinuation of therapy. Topiramate is an antiepileptic drug that elicits cognitive deficits more frequently than other antiepileptic drugs, impairing multiple cognitive domains including language, attention, and memory. Although up to 40% of individuals taking topiramate may experience cognitive deficits, we are currently unable to predict which individuals will be most severely affected before administration. The objective of this study was to show the contributions of plasma concentration and working memory capacity in determining the severity of an individual's topiramate-related cognitive impairment. Subjects were enrolled in a double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study during which they received a single dose of either 100, 150, or 200 mg topiramate. Working memory function was assessed using a modified Sternberg working memory task with 3 memory loads administered 4 hours after dosing. After adjustment for differences in working memory capacity, each 1 μg/mL of topiramate plasma concentration was associated with a 3.6% decrease in accuracy for all memory loads. Placebo effects occurred as a function of working memory capacity, with individuals with high working memory capacity experiencing less severe placebo-related impairment compared with those with low working memory capacity. Our results demonstrate that severity of topiramate-related cognitive deficits occurs as a function of both drug exposure and baseline cognitive function. By identifying patient- and exposure-related characteristics that modulate the severity of cognitive side effects, topiramate dosing strategies may be individually tailored in the future to prevent unwanted cognitive impairment.

Brain's compensatory response to drug-induced cognitive impairment

INTRODUCTION

Topiramate (TPM), a frequently prescribed antiseizure medication, can cause severe cognitive side-effects. Though these side-effects have been studied behaviorally, the underlying neural mechanisms are unknown. In a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study of TPM's impact on cognition, nine healthy volunteers completed three study sessions: a no-drug baseline session and two sessions during which they received either TPM or placebo. Electroencephalogram was recorded during each session while subjects performed a working-memory task with three memory-loads.

RESULTS

Comparing TPM with baseline we found the following results. (a) TPM administration led to declines in behavioral performance. (b) Fronto-central event-related potentials (ERP) elicited by probe stimuli, representing the primary task network activity, showed strong memory-load modulations at baseline, but the magnitude of these load-dependent modulations was significantly reduced during TPM session, suggesting drug-induced impairments of the primary task network. (c) ERP responses over bilateral fronto-temporal electrodes, which were not load sensitive at baseline, showed significant memory-load modulations after TPM administration, suggesting the drug-related recruitment of additional neural resources. (d) At fronto-central scalp sites, there was significant increase in response amplitude for low memory-load during TPM session compared to baseline, and the amplitude increase was dependent on TPM plasma concentration, suggesting that the primary task network became less efficient under TPM impact. (e) At bilateral fronto-temporal electrodes, there were no ERP differences when comparing low memory-load trials, but TPM administration led to an increase in ERP responses to high load, the magnitude of which was positively correlated with task performance, suggesting that the recruited neural resources were beneficial for task performance. Placebo-TPM comparison yielded similar effects albeit with generally reduced significance and effect sizes.

CONCLUSION

Our findings support the hypothesis that TPM impairs the primary task network by reducing its efficiency, which triggers compensatory recruitment of additional resources to maintain task performance.

Pharmacokinetics and Drug Interaction of Antiepileptic Drugs in Children and Adolescents

Selecting the most appropriate antiepileptic drug (AED) or combination of drugs for each patient and identifying the most suitable therapeutic regimen for their needs is increasingly challenging, especially among pediatric populations. In fact, the pharmacokinetics of several drugs vary widely in children with epilepsy because of age-related factors, which can influence the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination of the pharmacological agent. In addition, individual factors, such as seizure type, associated comorbidities, individual pharmacokinetics, and potential drug interactions, may contribute to large fluctuations in serum drug concentrations and, therefore, clinical response. Therapeutic drug concentration monitoring (TDM) is an essential tool to deal with this complexity, enabling the definition of individual therapeutic concentrations and adaptive control of dosing to minimize drug interactions and prevent loss of efficacy or toxicity. Moreover, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling integrated with dashboard systems have recently been tested in antiepileptic therapy, although more clinical trials are required to support their use in clinical practice. We review the mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, drug-drug interactions, and safety/tolerability profiles of the main AEDs currently used in children and adolescents, paying particular regard to issues of relevance when treating this patient population. Indications for TDM are provided for each AED as useful support to the clinical management of pediatric patients with epilepsy by optimizing pharmacological therapy.

Topiramate-induced weight loss depends on level of intellectual disability in patients with epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

Intellectual disability (ID) is associated with weight gain caused by antiepileptic drugs such as valproic acid. The present study analyzed the relationship between ID and weight loss caused by topiramate (TPM).

METHODS

Seventy-eight patients with epilepsy (35 women, aged 18 to 70years) were enrolled in this prospective study. Body weight was measured before and 1, 6, 12, and 18months after initiation of TPM treatment. Both patients and caregivers were provided information about TPM-related weight loss. The patients were divided into the group with no or mild ID (intelligence quotient >50) and the group with moderate to profound ID (intelligence quotient ≤50).

RESULTS

Body weight of both groups significantly decreased until 6months but stabilized after 12months. Weight loss at 6, 12, and 18months was significantly greater in the group with no or mild ID than in the group with moderate to profound ID. Body weight change at 18months was correlated with intellectual levels (β=0.274, p=0.011) and baseline body mass index (β=-0.322, p=0.002) by multiple linear regression analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study suggests that the pattern of weight loss during TPM administration differs according to intellectual levels. Patients with ID maintained their body weight. Weight loss due to TPM might be weakened by caregiver control of food intake or inactivity.

Effect of CYP Inducers/Inhibitors on Topiramate Concentration: Clinical Value of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

BACKGROUND

This study investigated the pharmacokinetic interactions between topiramate (TPM) and concomitant antiepileptic drugs and evaluated the therapeutic concentration range of TPM and the effect of the achieved plasma concentration on the retention rate of TPM therapy.

METHODS

A total of 1217 plasma samples obtained from 610 patients were retrospectively investigated, and the concentration-to-dose ratio (CD ratio) of TPM was compared among patients on various antiepileptic drug regimens. In addition, the therapeutic concentration of TPM was reviewed in patients on long-term therapy, and factors influencing the retention rate of TPM were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Among patients using hepatic enzyme inducers (phenytoin, phenobarbital, and carbamazepine), the CD ratio was reduced by 45.4% in adults and 33.3% in children. Patients taking phenytoin concomitantly had a significantly lower CD ratio than patients taking phenobarbital or carbamazepine. Among noninducers, concomitant use of stiripentol increased the CD ratio. In 276 patients who remained on TPM therapy for more than 2 years, the mean therapeutic concentration was 5.1 mcg/mL (15.0 μmol/L). The estimated retention day was significantly higher for patients with a TPM concentration >5 mcg/mL than that for patients with a concentration <5 mcg/mL (945 versus 802 days; P = 0.007 by the log-rank test). Also, patients without hepatic enzyme inducers had a significantly higher retention rate than patients using such inducers (P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Concomitant use of hepatic enzyme inducers markedly reduced the plasma TPM concentration and can decrease its antiepileptic effect. A therapeutic concentration of >5 mcg/mL TPM was significantly associated with continuation of therapy, and therapeutic drug monitoring can be helpful.

Efficacy and Tolerability of Second and Third Generation Anti-epileptic Drugs in Refractory Epilepsy: A Network Meta-Analysis

This study was proposed to compare the relative efficacy and tolerability of the second and third generation AEDs for refractory epilepsy. The 50% responder rate (RR) was selected as the efficacy outcome whereas the incidence of dizziness and somnolence were considered to evaluate the tolerability of AEDs. Odds ratio (OR) and their 95% credible interval (CrI) were obtained using a consistency model and surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) value was calculated to rank AEDs. Topiramate appeared to be significantly more effective than placebo, eslicarbazepine acetate, perampanel, pregabalin, zonisamide, gabapentin and lamotrigine with respect to the 50% RR (all OR > 1). Patients who were managed by eslicarbazepine acetate, perampanel, oxcarbazepine, topiramate and pregabalin were more likely to suffer from dizziness compared to those who receive placebo (all OR > 1). Perampanel, topiramate and pregabalin were related to elevated risks of somnolence compared to placebo (all OR > 1). Moreover, topiramate ranked highest with respect to 50% RR (SUCRA = 0.968) whereas levetiracetam appeared to have balanced efficacy and tolerability (SUCRA = 0.769, 0.743, 0.604 and 0.659). In conclusion, topiramate was the most efficacious AED, while levetiracetam was able to provide patients with balanced efficacy and tolerability.

Epilepsy, Antiepileptic Drugs, and Aggression: An Evidence-Based Review

Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) have many benefits but also many side effects, including aggression, agitation, and irritability, in some patients with epilepsy. This article offers a comprehensive summary of current understanding of aggressive behaviors in patients with epilepsy, including an evidence-based review of aggression during AED treatment. Aggression is seen in a minority of people with epilepsy. It is rarely seizure related but is interictal, sometimes occurring as part of complex psychiatric and behavioral comorbidities, and it is sometimes associated with AED treatment. We review the common neurotransmitter systems and brain regions implicated in both epilepsy and aggression, including the GABA, glutamate, serotonin, dopamine, and noradrenaline systems and the hippocampus, amygdala, prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, and temporal lobes. Few controlled clinical studies have used behavioral measures to specifically examine aggression with AEDs, and most evidence comes from adverse event reporting from clinical and observational studies. A systematic approach was used to identify relevant publications, and we present a comprehensive, evidence-based summary of available data surrounding aggression-related behaviors with each of the currently available AEDs in both adults and in children/adolescents with epilepsy. A psychiatric history and history of a propensity toward aggression/anger should routinely be sought from patients, family members, and carers; its presence does not preclude the use of any specific AEDs, but those most likely to be implicated in these behaviors should be used with caution in such cases.

Decision analysis of intracranial monitoring in non-lesional epilepsy

PURPOSE

Up to one third of epilepsy patients develop pharmacoresistant seizures and many benefit from resective surgery. However, patients with non-lesional focal epilepsy often require intracranial monitoring to localize the seizure focus. Intracranial monitoring carries operative morbidity risk and does not always succeed in localizing the seizures, making the benefit of this approach less certain. We performed a decision analysis comparing three strategies for patients with non-lesional focal epilepsy: (1) intracranial monitoring, (2) vagal nerve stimulator (VNS) implantation and (3) medical management to determine which strategy maximizes the expected quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for our base cases.

METHOD

We constructed two base cases using parameters reported in the medical literature: (1) a young, otherwise healthy patient and (2) an elderly, otherwise healthy patient. We constructed a decision tree comprising strategies for the treatment of non-lesional epilepsy and two clinical outcomes: seizure freedom and no seizure freedom. Sensitivity analyses of probabilities at each branch were guided by data from the medical literature to define decision thresholds across plausible parameter ranges.

RESULTS

Intracranial monitoring maximizes the expected QALYs for both base cases. The sensitivity analyses provide estimates of the values of key variables, such as the surgical risk or the chance of localizing the focus, at which intracranial monitoring is no longer favored.

CONCLUSION

Intracranial monitoring is favored over VNS and medical management in young and elderly patients over a wide, clinically-relevant range of pertinent model variables such as the chance of localizing the seizure focus and the surgical morbidity rate.

Altered cerebral activity associated with topiramate and its withdrawal in patients with epilepsy with language impairment: An fMRI study using the verb generation task

OBJECTIVE

Topiramate (TPM) is well recognized for its negative effects on language in healthy volunteers and patients with epilepsy. The aim of this study was to investigate the brain activation and deactivation patterns in TPM-treated patients with epilepsy with language impairment and their dynamic alteration during TPM withdrawal using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) with the verb generation task (VGT).

METHODS

Twelve patients with epilepsy experiencing subjective language disfluency after TPM add-on treatment (TPM-on) and thirty sex- and age-matched healthy controls (HCs) were recruited. All subjects received a battery of neuropsychological tests and an fMRI scan with the VGT. Withdrawal of TPM was attempted in all patients. Only six patients reached complete withdrawal without seizure relapses (TPM-off), and these patients underwent a reassessment of neuropsychological and neuroimaging tests.

RESULT

The neuropsychological tests demonstrated objective language impairments in TPM-on patients. Compared with the HCs, the bilateral medial prefrontal cortex and the posterior midline and lateral parts of the default mode network (DMN) (including the bilateral posterior cingulate cortex (PCC), the right medial prefrontal cortex, the right angular gyrus, the right inferior temporal gyrus, and the bilateral supramarginal gyrus) in TPM-on patients failed to deactivate during the VGT. Their task-induced activation patterns were largely similar to those of the HCs. After TPM withdrawal, partial improvement of both task-induced deactivation of the DMN (the left parahippocampal gyrus and the bilateral PCC) and task-related activation of the language network (the right middle frontal gyrus and the left superior occipital gyrus) was identified along with partial improvement of neuropsychological tests.

CONCLUSION

Task-induced deactivation is a more sensitive neuroimaging biomarker for the impaired language performance in patients administered TPM than task-induced activation. Disruption and reorganization of the balance between the DMN and the cortical language networks are found along with reversible TPM-related language impairment. These results may suggest an underlying brain mechanism by which TPM affects cognitive function.

Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Modeling of Intravenous and Oral Topiramate and Its Effect on the Symbol-Digit Modalities Test in Adult Healthy Volunteers

A sequential pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) modeling approach was used to quantify the effects of a single dose of topiramate (100 or 200 mg) on working memory, attention, and psychomotor speed as measured by the Symbol-Digit Modalities Test (SDMT). Established on data pooled from 3 randomized, crossover studies in healthy subjects (19-55 years of age), using both oral and a novel stable-labeled intravenous (IV) formulation of topiramate, an inhibitory Emax model was found to characterize the topiramate concentration-SDMT score relationship well. At the EC50 of 2.85 μg/mL, this topiramate plasma concentration value was estimated to be associated with a 25.5% reduction of SDMT score relative to baseline. Age was an important determinant of the baseline SDMT score, with an estimated decrease of 1.13% in baseline SDMT score with every year of age. Moreover, this approach enabled the quantification of the practice effect observed with repeated administration of the neuropsychological test over shorter testing intervals than have previously been reported in the literature. The finding of a significant effect following a single dose of topiramate in the range widely used to treat migraine and epilepsy needs to be evaluated in a broader patient population undergoing chronic treatment, as the narrow range of resultant concentrations limits the generalizability of the findings.

Metabolic disturbances and renal stone promotion on treatment with topiramate: a systematic review

AIMS

The use of topiramate, which is prescribed for the management of epilepsy, for migraine headache prophylaxis and as a weight-loss agent, has been associated with the development of metabolic acidosis, hypokalaemia and renal stone disease. We systematically reviewed all the literature.

METHODS

The systematic review of the literature was realized using the principles underlying the UK Economic and Social Research Council guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement.

RESULTS

Fourty-seven reports published between 1996 and 2013 were retained for the final analysis. Five case-control studies and six longitudinal studies addressed the effect of topiramate on acid-base and potassium balance. A significant tendency towards mild-to-moderate hyperchloraemic metabolic acidosis (with bicarbonate ≤21.0 mmol l(-1) in approximately every third case) and mild hypokalaemia (with potassium ≤3.5 mmol l(-1) in 10% of the cases) was noted on treatment with topiramate, which was similar in children and adults. A single study observed that topiramate causes mild hyperuricaemia in male adults. A tendency towards hypocitraturia, a recognized promoter of renal stone formation, was noted in all patients on topiramate.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing evidence supports the use of topiramate. Topiramate is generally well tolerated, and serious adverse events are rare. Nonetheless, the present systematic review of the literature indicates that its use is linked with the development of acidosis, hypokalaemia, hyperuricaemia and hypocitraturia.

Effectiveness of the ketogenic diet used to treat resistant childhood epilepsy in Scandinavia

BACKGROUND

This Scandinavian collaborative retrospective study of children treated with ketogenic diet (KD) highlights indications and effectiveness over two years follow-up.

METHODS

Five centres specialised in KD collected data retrospectively on 315 patients started on KD from 1999 to 2009. Twenty-five patients who stopped the diet within four weeks because of compliance-problems and minor side-effects were excluded. Seizure-type(s), seizure-frequency, anti-epileptic drugs and other treatments, mental retardation, autism-spectrum disorder and motor-dysfunction were identified and treatment-response was evaluated.

RESULTS

An intention-to-treat analysis was used. Responders (>50% seizure-frequency reduction) at 6, 12 and 24 months were 50%, 46% and 28% respectively, seizure-free were 16%, 13% and 10%. Still on the diet were 80%, 64% and 41% after 6, 12 and 24 months. No child had an increased seizure-frequency. The best seizure outcome was seen in the group with not-daily seizures at baseline (n = 22), where 45%, 41% and 32% became seizure-free at 6, 12 and 24 months A significant improvement in seizure-frequency was seen in atonic seizures at three months and secondary generalised seizures at three and six months. Side-effects were noted in 29 subjects; most could be treated and only two stopped due to hyperlipidaemia and two due to kidney-stones. In 167 patients treated with potassium-citrate, one developed kidney-stones, compared with six of 123 without potassium-citrate treatment (relative risk = 8.1).

CONCLUSIONS

As the first study of implementing KD in children in the Scandinavian countries, our survey of 290 children showed that KD is effective and well tolerated, even in such severe patients with therapy-resistant epilepsy, more than daily seizures and intellectual disability in the majority of patients. Long-term efficacy of KD was comparable or even better than reported in newer AEDs. Addition of potassium citrate reduced risk of kidney-stones. Our data indicate that the response might be predicted by seizure-frequency before initiation of the diet but not by age, seizure-type or aetiology.

Topiramate: Effects on cognition in patients with epilepsy, migraine headache and obesity

This paper reviews the clinical implications of topiramate (TPM)-induced cognitive deficits in patients with epilepsy, migraine headache, obesity, and in normal populations, followed by reviews of the literature describing the reversal of such deficits upon medication discontinuation. It also discusses animal investigations of TPM's role of neuroprotection in brain injury. TPM's most intolerable adverse effects (AEs) are on verbal fluency and reaction time, resulting in high discontinuation rates in patients taking it for epilepsy and migraine headache. However, because TPM is so effective in the treatment of epilepsy and migraine headache, its use is expected to continue. There appears to be greater tolerance of TPM's cognitive AEs when it is used in the treatment of obesity, perhaps because of the lower doses required. Research attempting to predict the populations most vulnerable to the cognitive effects caused by TPM is ongoing. Studies suggest that one such population may include patients with a past psychiatric history. Slow titration and administration of the lowest possible doses may decrease risk of cognitive deficits.

Cognitive side-effects of antiepileptic drugs in children

Although the causes of cognitive impairment in patients with epilepsy have not been completely elucidated, three factors are clearly involved: the underlying etiology of epilepsy, the effects of seizures or the epileptiform EEG discharges themselves, and the central nervous system effects of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). All commonly used AEDs have some effect on cognitive function, and the effect may be substantial when crucial functions are involved, such as learning in children. With phenobarbital, there is a high risk for serious cognitive effects impacting attention and memory. Phenytoin may affect mental speed, mainly in higher dosing and polytherapy. Moderate monotherapy doses do not seem to induce much effect. Valproate does not seem to impair cognition if sufficiently controlled for hyperammonemia. For carbamazepine, there are conflicting reports, which may be due to selection bias or dosing. For oxcarbazepine, there is no evidence for any detrimental change compared to valproate but mild improvements on attentional tests. For topiramate, there is clear evidence for topiramate-induced cognitive impairment (attention, memory, and language function) in adults and children. Although data is sketchy, levetiracetam does not seem to have a negative impact on cognition. For lamotrigine, there is evidence of a cognitive-enhancing effect on attention. No evidence for cognitive side-effects has been found for vigabatrin. Ethosuximide is not associated with cognitive impairment although the evidence is sketchy. For gabapentin, tiagabine, zonisamide, and rufinamide no studies in children are available.

Outcomes of sustained-release formulation of valproate and topiramate monotherapy in patients with epilepsy: a multi-centre, cohort study

BACKGROUND

New-generation antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) tend to replace traditional AEDs as the first-line choice for epilepsy. However, whether this change results in better outcome, especially in China, remains unknown.

METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Two broad spectrum AEDs, the traditional drug of sustained-release formulation of valproate (SRVPA) and the new-generation drug of topiramate, were compared in patients with epilepsy as monotherapy in this multi-centre, observational cohort study from 2000 to 2011. The primary outcome was time to treatment failure. The secondary outcomes included time to first seizure, time to 12-month remission, and time to 24-month remission. Drug tolerability was assessed. Cox proportional hazard models (95% confidence interval [CI]) were used to analyse the relative risks expressed as hazard ratios (HR). Of the 1008 recruited patients, 519 received SRVPA and 489 received topiramate. SRVPA was better than topiramate (28.3% vs. 41.5%; HR = 0.62, [95% CI 0.49-0.77]; p<0.0001) in primary outcome, and in time to first seizure (56.1% vs. 69.3%; HR = 0.73, [95% CI 0.62-0.86]; p = 0.0002). No significant difference was observed between two groups in time to 12-month remission (52.6% vs. 42.5%; HR = 1.01, [95% CI 0.84-1.23]; p = 0.88) and time to 24-month remission (34.7% vs. 25.2%; HR = 1.11, [95% CI 0.88-1.42]; p = 0.38). 36 patients (6.9%) in SRVPA group and 37 patients (7.6%) in topiramate group presented treatment failure associated with intolerable adverse events, there was no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.70).

CONCLUSIONS

The SRVPA is more suitable than topiramate for Chinese epileptic patients, and our results support the viewpoint that traditional AEDs should be the first-line choice for epilepsy rather than new-generation AEDs.

The effect of topiramate plasma concentration on linguistic behavior, verbal recall and working memory

This is the first study of the effect of topiramate on linguistic behavior and verbal recall using a computational linguistics system for automated language and speech analysis to detect and quantify drug-induced changes in speech recorded during discourse-level tasks. Healthy volunteers were administered a single, 100-mg oral dose of topiramate in two double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover studies. Subjects' topiramate plasma levels ranged from 0.23 to 2.81 μg/mL. We found a significant association between topiramate levels and impairment on measures of verbal fluency elicited during a picture description task, correct number of words recalled on a paragraph recall test, and reaction time recorded during a working memory task. Using the tools of clinical pharmacology and computational linguistics, we elucidated the relationship between the determinants of a drug's disposition as reflected in plasma concentrations and their impact on cognitive functioning as reflected in spoken language discourse.

Association between frequency of nocturnal epilepsy and language disturbance in children

In clinical practice, an association is commonly suggested between nocturnal epileptiform activity and language disorders in children. However, this association has not been studied systematically. This study explored the correlation between daily and nocturnal epileptiform discharges ratio, frequency of nocturnal epileptiform discharges, and severity of nocturnal seizures in correlation with the severity of language impairment. A total of 326 children referred to an epilepsy center were included. All children had a 24-hour electroencephalogram (EEG), a neuropsychologic assessment, and a reconfirmed diagnosis of epilepsy. The balance between verbal and performance IQ scores of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children was a focus of the study. A significant correlation between the severity of nocturnal seizures and lower verbal IQ scores compared to performance IQ scores was found (P < 0.05). There was a clinically relevant difference between performance IQ and verbal IQ between the groups of children with only nocturnal epileptiform EEG discharges and only epileptiform EEG discharges during wake (P = 0.033). Children with nocturnal epileptiform EEG discharges have lower verbal than performance IQs when compared to children with only epileptiform EEG discharges during wake. Although a causal relationship is unclear, this indicates an association between the occurrence of nocturnal epileptiform EEG discharges and language disturbance.

Clinical comparability of the new antiepileptic drugs in refractory partial epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Evaluate the clinical comparability of new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in partial refractory epilepsy.

METHODS

Systematic review of randomized trials (RCTs) comparing a new AED (add-on treatment) with placebo or another AED.

PRIMARY OUTCOMES

responder (≥50% seizure reduction) and withdrawal (tolerability) rates. Pooled estimates of odds ratios (ORs) and number needed treat/harm (NNT/NNH) taking into account baseline risk were derived by random-effects meta-analysis. Adjusted frequentist indirect comparisons between AEDs were estimated.

KEY FINDINGS

Sixty-two placebo-controlled (12,902 patients) and eight head-to-head RCTs (1,370 patients) were included. Pooled ORs for responder and withdrawal rates (vs. placebo) were 3.00 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.63-3.41] and 1.48 (1.30-1.68), respectively. Indirect comparisons of responder rate based on relative measurements of treatment effect (ORs) favored topiramate (1.52; 1.06-2.20) in comparison to all other AEDs, whereas gabapentin (0.67; 0.46-0.97) and lacosamide (0.66; 0.48-0.92) were less efficacious, without significant heterogeneity. When analyses were based on absolute estimates (NNTs), topiramate and levetiracetam were more efficacious, whereas gabapentin and tiagabine were less efficacious. Withdrawal rate was higher with oxcarbazepine (OR 1.60; 1.12-2.29) and topiramate (OR 1.68; 1.07-2.63), and lower with gabapentin (OR 0.65; 0.42-1.00) and levetiracetam (OR 0.62; 0.43-0.89).

SIGNIFICANCE

The differences found are of relatively small magnitude to allow a definitive conclusion about which new AED(s) has superior effectiveness. This uncertainty probably reflects the limitations of conclusions based on indirect evidence. The process of pharmacologic clinical decision making in partial refractory epilepsy probably depends more on other aspects, such as individual patient characteristics and pharmacoeconomics, than on available controlled randomized evidence.

The safety and tolerability of newer antiepileptic drugs in children and adolescents

The newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) provide more therapeutic options and overall improved safety and tolerability for patients. To provide the best care, physicians must be familiar with the latest tolerability and safety data. This is particularly true in children, given there are relatively fewer studies examining the effects of AEDs in children compared with adults. Since we now have significant paediatric literature on each of these agents, we provide a comprehensive and current literature review of the newer AEDs, focusing on safety and tolerability data in children and adolescents. Because the safety profiles in children differ from those in adults, familiarity with this literature is important for child neurologists and other paediatric caregivers. We have organized the data by organ system for each AED for easier reference.

Long-term effectiveness and tolerability of topiramate in children with epilepsy under the age of 2 years: 4-year follow-up

This is a long-term, open label, observational study aimed to broaden our clinical experiences in managing infants and toddlers with epilepsy. The long-term retention rate and side effects of topiramate (TPM) in them were evaluated and compared with carbamazepine (CBZ). A total of 146 children were involved in the study (TPM=41, CBZ=105). The retention rates at 24 , 36, and 48 months were 46.3%, 34.1%, 26.8% for TPM and 36.2%, 23.8%, 13.3% for CBZ, respectively. At 6 months after starting antiepileptic drugs (AED), the seizure freedom or clinical efficacy (seizure reduction rate more than 50 percent) were 73.2% for TPM and 62.9% for CBZ. The major side effects led to discontinuation included psychomotor slowing, poor oral intake from TPM and sleepiness and skin rash from CBZ. TPM was discontinued due to side effects in one case (2.4%) and lack of efficacy in five cases (12.2%), whereas CBZ was discontinued due to lack of efficacy (22.9%) and side effects (6.7%). As compared with CBZ, TPM showed the same long-term retention rate in children under the age of 2 yr, and no serious side effects. It is therefore concluded that TPM can be considered as a major AED for treating children with epilepsy under the age of 2 yr.

Exploring efficacy and tolerability outcomes in patients with difficult-to-treat epilepsy receiving adjunctive topiramate at different titration rates--an exploratory study

OBJECTIVE

To compare rapid vs regular titration of topiramate concerning efficacy and safety.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Open-label, prospective, single-center study exploring efficacy and tolerability of two adjunctive dosing regimens of topiramate (TPM) in adult patients with difficult-to-treat epilepsy. Based on investigator judgment, 21 of 50 consecutive patients received a rapid titration (starting dose 50 mg/day, stepwise increase with 50 mg/day after 3 days each until reaching the target dose), while the other 29 patients received titration according to the German prescribing information (starting dose 25 mg/day, stepwise increase with 25-50 mg/day every 7 days). Patients were observed until the target dose was reached and 3 months thereafter.

RESULTS

Mean final dosages were 136 mg/day (regular titration) and 213 mg/day (rapid titration). Efficacy and tolerability measures did not differ significantly. Forty-six percent of all patients experienced a seizure reduction of > or = 50%; 14% became seizure free. No serious adverse events occurred. The most common adverse effects were tiredness (20%), memory and language difficulties (18% each), slowness in thinking and speech (10%), psychomotor disturbance (8%) and paresthesia (8%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that rapid and conventional titration generate similar tolerability, safety and effectiveness in selected patients.

Urolithiasis with topiramate in nonambulatory children and young adults

Urolithiasis occurs infrequently in the pediatric population, where metabolic factors play a primary role in the pathogenesis of stone formation. Topiramate, an antiepileptic drug, is associated with a kidney stone in 1.5% of patients in published clinical trials. However, this risk may be much higher in certain populations with multiple preexisting risk factors. We performed a retrospective review of all nonambulatory and neurologically impaired individuals in a long-term care facility. Three groups were involved: those with no exposure to antiepileptic drugs, those on antiepileptic drugs other than topiramate, and those who had been treated with topiramate. Thirteen of 24 (54%) individuals on topiramate monotherapy or polytherapy developed clinical evidence of urolithiasis after a mean duration of 36.4 months. Our results suggest that nonambulatory and neurologically impaired individuals in a long-term care facility appear to be at higher risk of developing kidney stones with topiramate than previously reported.

The aspects and mechanisms of cognitive alterations in epilepsy: the role of antiepileptic medications

Epilepsy is a major health problem. Several studies suggest a significant influence of epilepsy and its treatment on dynamic and functional properties of brain activity. Epilepsy can adversely affect mental development, cognition, and behavior. Epileptic patients may experience reduced intelligence, attention, and problems in memory, language, and frontal executive functions. Neuropsychological, functional, and quantitative neuroimaging studies revealed that epilepsy affect the brain as a whole. Mechanisms of epilepsy-related cognitive dysfunction are poorly delineated. Cognitive deficits with epilepsy may be transient, persistent, or progressive. Transient disruption of cognitive encoding processes may occur with paroxysmal focal or generalized epileptic discharges, whereas epileptogenesis-related neuronal plasticity, reorganization, sprouting, and impairment of cellular metabolism are fundamental determinants for progressive cognitive deterioration. Also antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) have differential, reversible, and sometimes cumulative cognitive adverse consequences. AEDs not only reduce neuronal irritability but also may impair neuronal excitability, neurotransmitter release, enzymes, and factors critical for information processing and memory. The present article serves as an overview of recent studies in adult and childhood epilepsy literatures present in PubMed that highlighted cognitive evaluation in epilepsy field (publications till 2008 were checked). We also checked the reference lists of the retrieved studies for additional reports of relevant studies, in addition to our experience in this field. Our search revealed that although the aspects of cognitive dysfunction, risk factors, and consequences have been explored in many studies; however, the mechanisms of contribution of epilepsy-related variables, including AEDs, to patients' cognition are largely unexplored. In this review, we discussed the differential effect of AEDs in mature and immature brains and the known mechanisms underlying epilepsy and AEDs adverse effects on cognition. The nature, timing, course, and mechanisms of cognitive alteration with epilepsy and its medications are of considerable clinical and research implications.

Retention rates of new antiepileptic drugs in localization-related epilepsy: a single-center study

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated long-term retention rates of newer antiepileptic drugs (AED) in adults with localization-related epilepsy retrospectively.

METHODS

We estimated retention rates by Kaplan-Meier method in all 222 patients (age > or = 16) with localization-related epilepsy exposed to new AED at the Tampere University Hospital.

RESULTS

There were 141 patients exposed to lamotrigine, 78 to levetiracetam, 97 to topiramate, 68 to gabapentin, and 69 to tiagabine. Three-year retention rate for lamotrigine was 73.5%, levetiracetam 65.4%, topiramate 64.2%, gabapentin 41.7%, and tiagabine 38.2%. The most common cause for withdrawal of these AED was lack of efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that there are clinically significant differences among gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, tiagabine, and topiramate as treatment for focal epilepsy in everyday practice. Gabapentin and tiagabine seem to be less useful than the other three AED. Furthermore, our study supports the value of retention rate studies in assessing outcome of the drugs in clinical practice.

Cognitive and psychiatric effects of topiramate monotherapy in migraine treatment: an open study

Few data are available on cognitive and psychiatric effects of topiramate (TPM) monotherapy in migraine. Twenty patients affected by migraine were treated with TPM monotherapy. At the same time, twenty control subjects were selected. A comprehensive neuropsychological and behavioural battery of tests were performed at baseline (T0), at titration (T1) and in maintenance period (T2). Topiramate serum levels were also investigated at T1 and T2. On comparison with the control group, no cognitive and psychiatric differences were detected at baseline. A significant reduction of word fluency score (P < 0.05) was evident after TPM treatment, both at T1 and T2. No patient developed psychiatric adverse events. TPM induced an impairment of verbal fluency and no psychiatric adverse events, demonstrating selective negative cognitive profile in migraine therapy. Slow titration, low doses, lack of previous psychiatric disorders and/or familial history may explain our data.

Lamotrigine in clinical practice: long-term experience in patients with refractory epilepsy referred to a tertiary epilepsy center

Lamotrigine (LTG, Lamictal), one of the newer antiepileptic drugs, was admitted to the Dutch market in 1996. It was first used as adjunctive therapy and later as a monotherapy in partial and generalized epilepsy. All patients who started on LTG in 1996 or 1997 in the Epilepsy Centre Kempenhaeghe (n=314) were enrolled in this study and followed for 48 months. The data indicate that the retention rates for LTG after 1, 2, 3, and 4 years are respectively 74.4, 69.3, 63.1, and 55.6%. Patients with normal cognitive function were more likely to continue than patients with mental retardation. The main reason for discontinuing LTG therapy was lack of efficacy (19.1%). Four patients (1.4%) were seizure-free for the total follow-up period of 48 months. The most frequently reported negative side effects were dizziness and headache, both in patients who continued and in those who discontinued therapy. A large percentage of patients also reported positive side effects like "feeling/being more active" and "feeling more clear/more responsive." For the whole patient group, the plasma level of LTG was measured 277 times. Plasma levels of LTG were influenced by the patients' comedications. Plasma levels of LTG in groups taking LTG in monotherapy, LTG plus an inducer, and LTG plus valproate were 8.7, 4.8, and 8.7 mg/L, respectively. The correlation between measured plasma level and dose confirm the manufacturer's dose recommendations. The manufacturer recommends half the dosage of lamotrigine monotherapy when the patient also uses valproate. When the patient uses an inducer, the dosage of LTG must be two times the dose used in monotherapy.

Topiramate in the treatment of partial and generalized epilepsy

Topiramate (TPM) is a widely-used drug for the treatment of epilepsy. It is useful for several types of partial-onset and generalized-onset seizures, and is therefore considered a broad-spectrum agent. It is also effective as a prophylactic against migraine headaches. TPM was first approved for prescription use in 1996. In various countries it is now approved for adjunctive and monotherapy of partial-onset seizures and for therapy of generalized tonic-clonic seizures of nonfocal origin, for children and adults. For initial monotherapy of new-onset seizures, a target dose of 100 mg/day for adults is recommended. Adjunctive use with enzyme-inducing drugs and use for refractory seizures requires higher dosages, though the optimum dose for most patients does not exceed 400 mg/day. Excretion is primarily renal and TPM is not a significant hepatic enzyme inducer. Although it is usually safe and well-tolerated, adverse effects limit use in about 25% of patients. The most salient of these is cognitive dysfunction, especially problems with expressive speech and verbal memory. Weight loss, renal stones, paresthesias and other central nervous system side effects may occur. Tolerability is improved by low initial doses and slow titration to effect.

Increased propensity for calcium phosphate kidney stones with topiramate use

Topiramate (TPM) is a neuromodulatory agent that was initially approved as an antiepileptic drug and is increasingly used in the treatment of a number of neurological and metabolic disorders. Among its various pharmacological actions, TPM has been shown to inhibit the activity of specific carbonic anhydrase enzymes in the kidney. This action is associated with the development of metabolic acidosis, hypocitraturia, hypercalciuria and elevated urine pH, leading to an increased risk of kidney stone disease. Despite the cautionary note in the package insert of TPM, the extent of these complications has not been fully explored. Few prescribing physicians are aware of these complications, underscoring the need for improved surveillance. Because the drug is among the most frequently prescribed agents in the US, more controlled studies are required to determine the prevalence of kidney stone disease among TPM users, and the optimal approach to prevent and treat nephrolithiasis in these individuals.

Long-term effects of levetiracetam and topiramate in clinical practice: A head-to-head comparison

OBJECTIVE

Two of the most commonly prescribed new antiepileptic drugs as add-on therapy for patients with chronic refractory epilepsies are topiramate and levetiracetam. In regulatory trials, both drugs were characterized as very promising new antiepileptic drugs. However, results from these highly controlled short-term clinical trials cannot simply be extrapolated to everyday clinical practice, also because head-to-head comparisons are lacking. Therefore, results from long-term open label observational studies that compare two or more new AEDs are crucial to determine the long-term performance of competing new antiepileptic drugs in clinical practice.

METHOD

We analyzed all patients referred to a tertiary epilepsy centre who had been treated with topiramate from the introduction of the drug in spring 1993 up to a final assessment point mid-2002 and all patients who had been treated with LEV in the same centre from the introduction of the drug in early 2001 up to a final assessment point end-2003 using a medical information system.

RESULTS

Three hundred and one patients were included for levetiracetam and 429 patients for TPM. Retention rate after 1 year was 65.6% for LEV-treated patients and 51.7% for TPM-treated patients (p=0.0015). Similarly, retention rates for LEV were higher at the 24-month mark: 45.8% of LEV-treated patients and 38.3% of TPM-treated patients were still continuing treatment (p=0.0046). Adverse events led to drug discontinuation in 21.9% of TPM-treated patients compared to 6.0% of LEV-treated patients (p<0.001). The number of patients discontinuing treatment because of lack of efficacy was similar for both groups. Seizure freedom rates varied between 11.6 and 20.0% for TPM and between 11.1 and 14.3% for LEV per 6-months interval. Several important AED specific adverse events leading to drug discontinuation were identified, including neurocognitive side effects from TPM and mood disorders from LEV.

CONCLUSION

The retention rate for LEV is significantly higher than for TPM. LEV had a more favourable side effect profile than TPM with comparable efficacy. Patients on TPM discontinued treatment mainly because of neurocognitive side effects. In the treatment with LEV, the effects on mood must not be underestimated.

Comparative retention rates and long-term tolerability of new antiepileptic drugs

OBJECTIVE

Retention rates of five new anti-epileptic medications (AEDs) were compared in order to evaluate their long-term tolerability and efficacy.

METHOD

We acquired the retention data on levetiracetam (LEV), lamotrigine (LTG), oxcarbazepine (OXC), topiramate (TPM), and zonisamide (ZNS) from the electronic database. The data included patient's age, gender, seizure type, current and previous medications, dosage, main reasons for discontinuation, and duration of therapy. The retention rates of these AEDs were evaluated at 4, 12, 24, 52, and 104 weeks.

RESULTS

A total of 828 new AED exposures were obtained (LEV=196, LTG=251, OXC=97, TPM=156, ZNS=128) from patients with partial or generalized epilepsy. At 2 years, retention rate was highest with LTG (74.1%), followed by ZNS (60.2%), OXC (58.8%), LEV (53.6%), and TPM (44.2%). When these AEDs were discontinued, it was mainly due to inefficacy (29.5%) and sedating side-effects (20.5%), and commonly within 6 months into therapy. Several important AED specific side-effects leading to discontinuation were identified, including behavioral or irritability from LEV, rash from LTG and OXC, nausea from OXC and ZNS, hyponatremia from OXC, and kidney stones from TPM and ZNS.

CONCLUSION

Comparing retention rates of new AEDs can provide useful insight into their tolerability and efficacy. This study showed highest retention rate with LTG, which was significantly different from ZNS (p=0.0025), LEV (p<0.0001), OXC (p=0.0024), and TPM (p<0.0001). Beside ineffectiveness, other leading causes of discontinuation were adverse behavioral effects with LEV, rash with LTG and OXC, and sedation for TPM and ZNS.

Long-term retention rates of new antiepileptic drugs in adults with chronic epilepsy and learning disability

We compared the long-term retention rates of several newly licensed antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in a residential community of adults with chronic epilepsy and learning disability. Data relating to duration of therapy, maximum dose, and tolerability of six new AEDs-gabapentin (GBP), lamotrigine (LTG), levetiracetam (LEV), oxcarbazepine (OXC), tiagabine (TIA), and topiramate (TPM)-were collected. Drug retention at 2 years was 85% (OXC), 57% (LTG), 56% (LEV), 45% (TPM), 24% (TIA) and 15% (GBP). OXC was used mainly as a substitute for carbamazepine. LTG, LEV, and TPM were all associated with retention rates higher than those of GBP or TIA. TPM had the highest rate of adverse event development at the maximum tried dose (60%), whereas LEV had the lowest (16%). Experience from this single epilepsy community study indicated limited impact for GBP or TIA but higher retention of OXC, LEV, LTG, and TPM in patients with chronic epilepsy and learning disability.

The Effect of Antiepileptic Drugs on Cognition: Patient Perceived Cognitive Problems of Topiramate versus Levetiracetam in Clinical Practice

INTRODUCTION

Neurocognitive complaints may interfere with long-term antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment and are an important issue in clinical practice. Most data about drug-induced cognitive problems are derived from highly controlled short-term clinical trials. We analyzed such cognitive complaints for the two most commonly used AEDs in a clinical setting using patient perceived problems as primary outcome measure.

METHOD

All patients of the epilepsy center Kempenhaeghe that received topiramate (TPM) or levetiracetam (LEV) from the introduction to mid 2004 were analyzed using a medical information system, an automated medical file. Patients were analyzed after 6, 12, and 18 months of treatment.

RESULTS

Four hundred and two patients used either TPM (n = 260) or LEV (n = 142); 18 months retention showed a statistically significant difference, revealing 15% more patients that continued LEV compared to TPM: 18 months retention 46% for TPM and 61% for LEV [F (1.400) = 3.313, p = 0.043]. Neurocognitive complaints accounted for a significant number of drug discontinuations and especially the high frequency of neurocognitive complaints in the first period of TPM treatment appeared to be significant different from LEV [F(2,547) = 3.192, p = 0.042]. In the remaining patients, the difference in neurocognitive complaints was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

cognitive complaints are common in TPM treatment and frequently lead to drug withdrawal. The impact of LEV on cognitive function is only mild. This leads to a much higher (15%) drug discontinuation rate for TPM compared to LEV.

Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of new antiepileptic drugs: what can we learn from long-term studies?

OBJECTIVE

A review of long-term open-label studies was performed with the aim of detecting differences in efficacy and/or tolerability of new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs).

METHODS

From more than 500 open studies conducted to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of gabapentin (GBP), lamotrigine (LTG), levetiracetam (LEV), oxcarbazepine (OXC), pregabalin (PGB), tiagabine (TGB), topiramate (TPM) or zonisamide (ZNS), we selected all studies that reported or allowed us to calculate the number of patients who achieved seizure freedom for 6 months and/or the number of patients withdrawing for adverse effects and/or the number or percentage of patients continuing treatment after 1 year.

RESULTS

No studies were found in which this information was available for OXC, PGB, TGB or ZNS. The number of patients who achieved seizure freedom for 6 months was reported in four studies each for GBP and TPM, five studies for LTG, and eight studies for LEV. The best efficacy profile using this end point was found for LEV, followed by TPM, LTG, and GBP. Twenty-two studies reported the number of patients withdrawing due to adverse effects. LEV was the best-tolerated AED, a little ahead of LTG, and significantly better than GBP or TPM . TPM was by far the least well-tolerated drug. Information concerning patients continuing treatment after 1 year was reported in two GBP studies, two TPM studies, six LEV studies and five LTG studies. GBP had a very low retention rate (between 20% and 25% of patients continued the drug), while TPM and LTG had a retention rate of 40-60% and LEV had a retention rate of 60-75%.

CONCLUSION

One limitation of these rankings is that their statistical value is limited because of the indirect nature of the comparisons. Anyhow, this review covers the main studies published thus far on this subject and provides full updated information on the current literature about these drugs.

Levetiracetam: a long-term follow-up study of efficacy and safety

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of long-term add-on treatment with levetiracetam 1,000-4,000 mg/day.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this multicenter, open-label follow-up study, 505 patients, from 10 European countries, who had benefited from previous add-on treatment with levetiracetam in a clinical trial or compassionate-use program were enrolled; 274 (54.3%) stayed to the end. Most then continued levetiracetam by prescription or in a named patient program, where it was not yet commercially available. Mean treatment duration was 1,045 days (range: 24 days to >7 years). Median daily dosage was 3,000 mg/day (range: 250-6,000 mg/day), with 250 (49.5%) patients receiving levetiracetam for >3 years.

RESULTS

Median total and partial seizure frequency per week over the evaluation period were 0.8 and 0.7; seizure frequency per week was generally stable over time and remained low. There was a probability of 6.6% of remaining seizure-free for the first 3 years, and of 18.9% of having a seizure-free period of at least 3 years at any time. Most adverse events were mild or moderate and unrelated to study drug. Levetiracetam was well tolerated, and provided stable seizure control during long-term treatment.

Functional MRI reveals declined prefrontal cortex activation in patients with epilepsy on topiramate therapy

Functional magnetic resonance imaging of covert word generation was used to examine brain activation abnormalities associated with topiramate-induced cognitive language impairment in patients with epilepsy. Compared with a control epilepsy group, in the topiramate-treated group, there was significantly less activation in the language-mediating regions of the prefrontal cortex; the topiramate group also had significantly lower neuropsychological language scores. These findings suggest that topiramate has a critical effect on the cerebral neural systems that mediate expressive language.

Cognitive Effects of Low-dose Topiramate Compared with Oxcarbazepine in Epilepsy Patients

Background and Purpose

Low-dose topiramate (TPM) monotherapy has recently been found effective for seizure control in newly diagnosed epilepsy. In higher dosages, TPM has been associated with relatively high rates of adverse cognitive effects; similar side effects have been seen after rapid titration or polytherapy. However, its cognitive effects during low-dose monotherapy have not been established. We evaluated the cognitive effects of low-dose TPM compared with oxcarbazepine (OXC), a drug that does not appear to affect cognitive function.

Methods

Cognitive tests and subjective complaints of 30 patients with low-dose TPM monotherapy (50-200 mg/day) were retrospectively compared with those of 30 patients with OXC monotherapy at 1 year of medication. The two groups did not differ with respect to epilepsy-relevant variables, nor on baseline neuropsychological tests.

Results

The TPM group showed a significant difference in the performance of delayed word recall (P<0.05), backward digit span (P<0.01), and verbal fluency (P<0.05) compared with the OXC group. The TPM group showed worse performances of digit span and verbal fluency. The OXC group showed better performances of delayed word recall. The incidence of cognitive complaints was higher in the TPM group (50%) than in the OXC group (20%) (P<0.05). These cognitive effects shown in the TPM group were dose-related. The cognitive dysfunction was trivial with patients taking 50 mg/day TPM.

Conclusions

Even at low-dose, TPM has a negative effect on working memory and verbal fluency compared with OXC. It can be demonstrated at 1 year of treatment.

Cognitive effects of low-dose topiramate monotherapy in epilepsy patients: A 1-year follow-up

The present study was conducted to evaluate the long-term effects of low-dose topiramate (TPM) monotherapy on the cognitive function of epilepsy patients. Forty-seven epilepsy patients received TPM, with target doses of 50, 75, and 100 mg/day. Cognitive tests were performed twice, at baseline and 1 year after starting medication. Thirty-six patients completed the follow-up neuropsychological tests. After a year of treatment, 16 patients (44%) complained of cognitive problems. Although it improved seizure frequency and EEG abnormalities, TPM had significantly negative effects on the digit span and verbal fluency tests. These cognitive effects were dose-related and significantly improved after withdrawal from TPM and substitution with older antiepileptic drugs. In conclusion, even at a low dose, TPM has long-term, negative effects on working memory and verbal fluency.

Behaviour, cognition and epilepsy

Cognitive and behavioural impairments have been observed as a consequence even of single seizures. In individuals with high seizure frequency, such impairments may accumulate and have a much greater impact on daily life than hitherto suspected. In addition, the risk of behavioural impairments is increased for some seizure types, such as secondary generalized seizures. Moreover, for all epilepsy types, increased risk is associated with persistent or poorly controlled seizures. Clinical studies show that cognitive impairments induced by seizures are reversible for most seizure types when seizures are controlled adequately. Additionally, for some seizure types there may be a kind of time window within which impairments are reversible. Exceeding the time window may result in irreversible impairment. These studies suggest that antiepileptic drug treatment can thus protect against such secondary behavioural impairments or at least correct these when seizures are controlled. This emphasizes the need to achieve complete and early seizure control. On the contrary, all antiepileptic drugs have a detrimental effect on the central nervous system and may affect cognitive function, behaviour and mood to some extent. Some treatments may undo the beneficial effects of antiepileptic drug treatment by inducing new or other cognitive impairments. This once more illustrates the need for the emphasis of clinical practice to evolve from mere seizure control to a more comprehensive approach, in which the prevention of central cognitive effects and effects on daily life of both seizures and drugs is given due attention. Optimal management requires a careful balance between, on the one hand, the desire to reach early and maximal seizure control and, on the other, the need to avoid tolerability problems related to cognitive and behavioural impairments. This article reviews how this balance can be achieved for older and newer antiepileptic drugs.

Ultimate success in epilepsy - the patient's perspective

Most people with epilepsy can live outwardly normal lives, but fear about impending seizures, driving restrictions, lack of independence, employment and social problems, medication-related adverse effects and the presence of cognitive or psychiatric complications are all concerns readily identified by affected individuals. While seizure control is the overriding goal of treatment, it is essential to realize the importance that patients place on other aspects of daily functioning. While many of the concerns identified by patients can only be managed by improved social support, others (e.g. neuropsychological impairment, medication-related adverse events, cognitive impairment, sleep disturbance) may be amenable to therapy (if available) or to the selection of a more appropriate antiepileptic drug. Each antiepileptic drug has a unique pharmacodynamic and tolerability profile. Awareness by the treating clinician of the pharmacological profile of each drug may help to minimize unwanted treatment-related effects and possibly improve the outcome of treatment from an epilepsy patient's perspective. Therefore, in order to achieve true treatment success, clinicians need to understand how individuals perceive their disorder and, where possible, address those factors that adversely affect patient quality of life. For the person with epilepsy, successful treatment involves beneficial effects on social, vocational and psychological function. This extends beyond seizure control to freedom from the fear associated with seizures, confidence in pharmacological therapy and improvements in health-related quality of life.

Ketter's hypothesis of the mood effects of antiepileptic drugs coupled to the mechanism of action of topiramate and levetiracetam

Mood-modulating profiles of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) have been classified by Ketter, Post, and Theodore [Neurology 1999; 53 (5, Suppl. 2) S53-76] into two classes: the first class is assumed to have deactivating effects related to GABA potentiation, and the second class is assumed to have activating effects that are associated with glutamate attenuation. We tested this hypothesis by reviewing the multiple mechanisms of action of topiramate (TPM) and levetiracetam (LEV) together with clinical behavioral side effects of patients who had been treated with TPM and LEV in a tertiary referral center for epilepsy. We found LEV to manifest activating and deactivating side effects equally and TPM to act as a deactivating AED, with tiredness/sleepiness side effects being predominant. TPM, in comparison to LEV, was found to be associated with a high incidence of side effects. Testing the hypothesis of Ketter et al. (1999) the deactivating effects of TPM may be coupled to a predominance of potentiation of GABA, but the oversimplified basis of the model needs to be acknowledged.