Semiological classification of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures

Functional seizure semiology and classification in a public and private hospital

PURPOSE

Our understanding of potential differences in seizure semiology among patients with functional seizures (FS), also known as psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES), across socioeconomic contexts is currently limited. By examining the differences in seizure manifestations between different socioeconomic groups, we aim to enhance the understanding of how socioeconomic factors may influence FS presentation. This study aimed to describe FS semiology in patients from a private and public epilepsy monitoring units (EMUs) in Cape Town, South Africa.

METHODS

The study included patients with FS confirmed through video-electroencephalography (video-EEG) and without comorbid epilepsy. For this retrospective case-control study, data on seizure semiology was gathered from digital patient records, beginning with the earliest available record for each hospital.

RESULTS

A total of 305 patients from a private hospital and 67 patients from a public hospital were eligible for the study (N = 372). The private hospital tended to report more akinetic and subjective seizure types when compared to the public hospital. Additionally, patients at the public hospital had higher odds of reporting emotional seizure triggers (aOR=2.57, 95% CI [1.03, 6.37]), loss of consciousness or awareness (aOR=2.58, 95% CI [1.07, 6.24]), and rapid post-event recovery (aOR=6.01, 95% CI [2.52, 14.34]). At the same time, they were less likely to report both short (<30 s) (aOR=0.21, 95% CI [0.08, 0.55]) and long (>5 min) seizures (aOR=0.73, 95% CI [0.13, 0.56]), amnesia for the event (aOR=0.19, 95% CI [0.09, 0.43]), ictal aphasia (aOR=0.33, 95% CI [0.14, 0.76]) or falls and drop attacks (aOR=0.43, 95% CI [0.18, 0.996]), when compared to the private hospital patients.

CONCLUSION

While the seizure manifestations were largely consistent across the two socioeconomic cohorts of patients with FS, some subtle differences were observed and warrant further investigation.

Minimum standards for inpatient long-term video-EEG monitoring: A clinical practice guideline of the international league against epilepsy and international federation of clinical neurophysiology

The objective of this clinical practice guideline is to provide recommendations on the indications and minimum standards for inpatient long-term video-electroencephalographic monitoring (LTVEM). The Working Group of the International League Against Epilepsy and the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology develop guidelines aligned with the Epilepsy Guidelines Task Force. We reviewed published evidence using The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. We found limited high-level evidence aimed at specific aspects of diagnosis for LTVEM performed to evaluate patients with seizures and nonepileptic events (see Table S1). For classification of evidence, we used the Clinical Practice Guideline Process Manual of the American Academy of Neurology. We formulated recommendations for the indications, technical requirements, and essential practice elements of LTVEM to derive minimum standards used in the evaluation of patients with suspected epilepsy using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation). Further research is needed to obtain evidence about long-term outcome effects of LTVEM and establish its clinical utility.

Minimum standards for inpatient long-term video-electroencephalographic monitoring: A clinical practice guideline of the International League Against Epilepsy and International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology

The objective of this clinical practice guideline is to provide recommendations on the indications and minimum standards for inpatient long-term video-electroencephalographic monitoring (LTVEM). The Working Group of the International League Against Epilepsy and the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology develop guidelines aligned with the Epilepsy Guidelines Task Force. We reviewed published evidence using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis) statement. We found limited high-level evidence aimed at specific aspects of diagnosis for LTVEM performed to evaluate patients with seizures and nonepileptic events. For classification of evidence, we used the Clinical Practice Guideline Process Manual of the American Academy of Neurology. We formulated recommendations for the indications, technical requirements, and essential practice elements of LTVEM to derive minimum standards used in the evaluation of patients with suspected epilepsy using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation). Further research is needed to obtain evidence about long-term outcome effects of LTVEM and to establish its clinical utility.

Comparison of semiology in patients with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures or with epilepsy in Puerto Rico

PURPOSE

The aims of this study were to develop a descriptive profile of patients with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) in Puerto Rico who have been evaluated using an epilepsy monitoring unit. The other aim was to establish comparisons between the clinical manifestation of PNES and events of generalized epilepsy (GE).

METHOD

A retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the information of patients who passed through the Epilepsy Unit in Caguas, Puerto Rico. In the first phase, sociodemographic information of 100 patients with PNES was collected. In the second phase, a sample of 51 cases was obtained; 37 cases with a final diagnosis of PNES and 14 cases with the diagnosis of GE. Observations were made with the objective of viewing and comparing the semiology and clinical manifestation presented through video encephalograms (vEEG) in both subsamples.

RESULTS

Patients with PNES and epilepsy demonstrated different semiological patterns. Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures is predominant in females (95%). Most patients with epilepsy presented a relatively short seizure (<2 min) compared with patients with PNES (79% vs. 46%). Patients with epilepsy showed a slow return to their baseline manifestation (100% vs. 11%). Specifically, having their eyes closed, extreme asynchronous limb movements, and rigidity were statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

These findings provide evidence that the semiology of patients with PNES is different from those displaying an epileptic seizure. This study supports the idea that the semiology of Latino patients with PNES is similar to the characteristics reported in other countries.

Effect of meteorological factors and lunar phases on occurrence of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures

BACKGROUND

Psychogenicnonepilepticseizures (PNES) lack the abnormal electrographical discharges in electroencephalogram seen in epileptic seizures. The notion of the effects of meteorological factors and lunar phases onoccurrence of seizures in patients with PNES has been the subject of very few research studies and the available evidence in the literature is equivocal. In this study, we aimed to study the influence oflunarphases and meteorological factors on the frequency of PNES and its semiological categories.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients discharged with a diagnosis of PNES from our epilepsy monitoring unit in a 3-year period. The 119 patients who met the inclusion criteria were categorized into hypermotor, hypomotor, or intact sensorium based on semiology of their seizures. The occurrence of PNES, in total and in each semiological category, was correlated with the daily average temperature, atmospheric pressure, and the 4 lunar phases.

RESULTS

There were 31.8% and 11.1% more-than-expected captured seizures when the average daily atmospheric pressure was lower or higher, respectively, of what is generally considered a comfortable atmospheric pressure. No consistent relation was found between the full moon phases and occurrence of PNES.

CONCLUSION

A significant association between atmospheric pressure and the occurrence of nonepileptic seizures was found, whereas no consistent increase in PNES was observed during the full moon phases. There is still an open debate about the effect of the lunar phases on human behavior and neurological disorders such as PNES.

Psychogenic non-epileptic seizures in children

Psychogenic Non-Epileptic Seizures (PNES) are a relatively common condition in children. While their clinical presentation resembles epileptic seizures, the underlying cause for PNES involves a multitude of bio-psychosocial factors. Patients may be misdiagnosed with epilepsy and subjected to unnecessary treatments, often delaying the diagnosis for years. A strong understanding of its symptomatology is essential for diagnosis of PNES. Successful management depends on effective teamwork that involves the neurologist as well as mental health professionals. This paper reviews the various aspects of PNES in children with emphasis on the clinical presentation, diagnosis as well as the underlying psychological basis and treatment.

Differential Semiology Based on Video Electroencephalography Monitoring Between Psychogenic Nonepileptic Seizures and Temporal Lobe Epileptic Seizures

BACKGROUND

Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNESs) are disruptive changes in behavior without ictal correlate of epileptic activity and high prevalence of psychiatric morbidity. Differential diagnosis is difficult particularly with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), which is also associated with high prevalence of psychiatric comorbidity. Although video electroencephalography is the gold standard for differential diagnosis, clinical semiology analysis may help the clinician in general medical practice.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, the differential semiology, based on video electroencephalography, between PNESs and TLE seizures was analyzed.

METHODS

The video electroencephalography of patients with diagnosis of PNES and TLE were reviewed and compared between groups. Clinical semiology of all episodes recorded by video electroencephalography in each patient was analyzed and classified in accordance with the presence of behavioral arrest, motor hyperkinetic activity, impaired awareness, aura, and automatisms. Chi square test and binary logistic regression were determined.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients with PNES (32 ± 11 y) and 34 with TLE (32 ± 12 y) were included. Female patients were predominant in the PNES group (P < 0.05). Mean time duration of episodes was 6.8 ± 10 minutes in PNES and 1.6 ± 0.8 minutes in TLE (P < 0.05). Impaired awareness (odds ratio = 24.4; 95% confidence interval = 3.79 -157.3, P < 0.01), automatisms (odds ratio = 13.9; 95% confidence interval = 2.1- 90.5, P < 0.01), and shorter duration of the events (odds ratio = 2.261, 95% confidence interval = 1.149 - 4.449, P = 0.018) were found as independent factors for detecting TLE seizures comparing PNESs.

CONCLUSION

Clinical semiology analysis may orientate the differential diagnosis in general medical practice, between PNESs and TLE seizures. Further studies comparing PNES semiology with other subtypes of epilepsies may complete these preliminary findings.

Psychogenic Non-epileptic Seizures and Pseudo-Refractory Epilepsy, a Management Challenge

Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) are neurobehavioral conditions positioned in a gray zone, not infrequently a no-man land, that lies in the intersection between Neurology and Psychiatry. According to the DSM 5, PNES are a subgroup of conversion disorders (CD), while the ICD 10 classifies PNES as dissociative disorders. The incidence of PNES is estimated to be in the range of 1.4-4.9/100,000/year, and the prevalence range is between 2 and 33 per 100,000. The International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) has identified PNES as one of the 10 most critical neuropsychiatric conditions associated with epilepsy. Comorbidity between epilepsy and PNES, a condition leading to "dual diagnosis," is a serious diagnostic and therapeutic challenge for clinicians. The lack of prompt identification of PNES in epileptic patients can lead to potentially harmful increases in the dosage of anti-seizure drugs (ASD) as well as erroneous diagnoses of refractory epilepsy. Hence, pseudo-refractory epilepsy is the other critical side of the PNES coin as one out of four to five patients admitted to video-EEG monitoring units with a diagnosis of pharmaco-resistant epilepsy is later found to suffer from non-epileptic events. The majority of these events are of psychogenic origin. Thus, the diagnostic differentiation between pseudo and true refractory epilepsy is essential to prevent actions that lead to unnecessary treatments and ASD-related side effects as well as produce a negative impact on the patient's quality of life. In this article, we review and discuss recent evidence related to the neurobiology of PNES. We also provide an overview of the classifications and diagnostic steps that are employed in PNES management and dwell on the concept of pseudo-resistant epilepsy.

Semiological classification of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: A systematic review and a new proposal

PURPOSE

A semiological classification of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) may help address proper diagnosis and management and also provide standardization for future studies. The aim of the current paper was to systematically review the literature on the proposed classification systems for the semiology of PNES and to provide a new proposal based on the best available evidence.

METHODS

I searched the electronic database PubMed on May 16, 2019 for articles that included the following search terms: "psychogenic" AND "semiology" or "classification" and also "nonepileptic" AND "semiology" or "classification" and also "pseudoseizure" AND "semiology" or "classification" since 1940. I applied the same methodology using the electronic database Scopus, though I limited the search to the title, abstract, and keywords.

RESULTS

I could identify 15 classification systems through this search strategy using the electronic database PubMed. Searching the Scopus did not yield any additional relevant papers.

CONCLUSION

I proposed a new semiological classification system for PNES based on this systematic review. This includes three major classes of motor seizures, nonmotor seizures, and mixed semiology. A universally accepted and appropriate semiological classification system for PNES may lead to better standardization of future studies and may also help in better understanding of the pathophysiological basis of this condition.

Semiological characteristics of patients with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: Gender-related differences

Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) are more prevalent among women, and diagnosis may sometimes be delayed by as much as seven years. Understanding the effect of gender on the presentation of a PNES may assist with diagnosis based on semiological details in the clinical setting. Although video-EEG monitoring (VEM) is the gold standard for diagnosing PNES, determining gender-related seizure semiology through careful history may prevent diagnostic delay while waiting for VEM. The aim of this study was to investigate gender-related differences in the semiology of PNES. Patients, all aged at least 16 years, diagnosed with PNES following VEM between December 2005 and November 2016 were included in this study. All patients' medical records and video-EEG-documented PNES were reviewed, and the presence or absence of semiological signs was recorded for each documented attack. Demographic features and semiological signs of PNES were compared between female and male patients. Forty-one patients (31 females, 10 males) aged 27.2 ± 12.2 years (range: 16-65) were included in the study. Mean age at onset of PNES was higher for female patients than males, at 24.3 ± 11.5 versus 17.5 ± 3.2 years (p = 0.005). The median duration of PNES was longer for female patients than males, at 10 min (range: 5 s-120 min) versus 2 min (range: 10 s-60 min) (p = 0.016). The most common symptom was forced eye closure in both genders. No significant gender-specific differences were observed in terms of the type or semiology of PNES. Although there are no major gender-related differences in PNES semiology, our findings highlight the importance of greater caution, especially in male patients, when diagnosing PNES, remembering that onset may also occur at young ages and that a short seizure duration does not exclude PNES.

Comparison of postictal semiology and behavior in psychogenic nonepileptic and epileptic seizures

BACKGROUND

The available information on postictal semiology and behavior in patients with psychogenic nonepileptic seizure (PNES) is limited. In this study, we explore the differences in postictal semiology and behavior between patients with epileptic seizure (ES) and PNES and focus on clinical features that may be helpful in differentiating these two conditions.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, video-electroencephalograph (video-EEG) of 144 seizures from 64 patients with PNES and 66 seizures from 42 patients with ES were reviewed. Three novel postictal behaviors were compared between the two groups: a) abrupt, brief, and rapid blinking or shaking of the head as if regaining sensorium or "coming out" of the ictal event; b) looking around the room with a scanning and uncertain look; c) posing a question of "what happened?" or a similar question to the others present in the room. In addition, differences in several other postictal characteristics were studied.

RESULTS

At least one of the three specific postictal behaviors was seen in 20.1% of patients with PNES but none of the patients with ES resulting in 100% specificity and 36% sensitivity. While mean ictal duration was significantly longer in patients with PNES (175.3 ± 168 s) compared to ES (105.4 ± 102.9 s), the interval between the end of ictal episode and first correct verbal response (74.5 ± 126.2 s versus 139.4 ± 185.4 s), or first followed command (84.1 ± 133.8 s versus 141.1 ± 192.1 s) were shorter. In the group with PNES, 59.7% of patients demonstrated a whispering or altered voice during the first correct verbal response versus 21.2% of patients in the group with ES. The first followed command was slow or erroneous in 49.3% of the patients with PNES and in 19.7% of the patients with ES.

CONCLUSION

In this study, we found significant differences between postictal semiology and behavior of patients with PNES and ES that can be helpful tools in distinguishing between these two conditions. Specifically, three novel postictal behaviors were studied and were found to have a high specificity, but low sensitivity, in distinguishing PNES from ES.