Postoperative outcomes following pediatric intracranial electrode monitoring: A case for stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG)

Pediatric Neurostimulation and Practice Evolution

Since the late nineteenth century, the prevailing view of epilepsy surgery has been to identify a seizure focus in a medically refractory patient and eradicate it. Sadly, only a select number of the many who suffer from uncontrolled seizures benefit from this approach. With the development of safe, efficient stereotactic methods and targeted surgical therapies that can affect deep structures and modulate broad networks in diverse disorders, epilepsy surgery in children has undergone a paradigmatic evolutionary change. With modern diagnostic techniques such as stereo electroencephalography combined with closed loop neuromodulatory systems, pediatric epilepsy surgery can reach a much broader population of underserved patients.

Neuropathologic changes associated with stereoelectroencephalography depth electrode placement

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to detail the neuropathologic changes resulting from the surgical placement of stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) leads in an initial small group of epilepsy cases and to raise awareness of this iatrogenic pathology, especially to those medical providers who specialize in the care of epilepsy patients.

METHODS

Five consecutive patients who underwent epilepsy resection surgery following SEEG monitoring at OSF Saint Francis Medical Center were included in our report. Resection specimens were examined grossly and entirely submitted for microscopic evaluation by a neuropathologist. Seizure-related pathologies, as well as histologic changes related to SEEG electrode placement, were documented.

RESULTS

The patient cohort included two females and three males, with an age range of 9 to 47 years. Neuropathologic examination revealed one or more seizure-related pathologies in each patient's resection specimen. In addition, all brain resection specimens showed multiple microinfarcts, which appeared to correlate with the placement and size of SEEG electrodes. Patchy leptomeningeal chronic inflammation was also seen in most cases.

CONCLUSIONS

SEEG electrode placement is an effective procedure for determining epileptogenic regions and guiding subsequent resection surgeries in medically refractory epilepsy. Multiple microinfarcts and chronic inflammation are commonly seen in brain resection specimens following SEEG electrode insertion, but studies detailing these iatrogenic histopathologic changes are lacking. The clinical significance and long-term implications of multiple small foci of electrode-induced injury that remain in the patient's brain after resection of the epileptogenic focus are unknown and may provide a welcome area for future study.

Accuracy of Depth Electrodes is Not Time-Dependent in Robot-Assisted Stereoelectroencephalography in a Pediatric Population

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Robot-assisted stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG) is steadily supplanting traditional frameless and frame-based modalities for minimally invasive depth electrode placement in epilepsy workup. Accuracy rates similar to gold-standard frame-based techniques have been achieved, with improved operative efficiency. Limitations in cranial fixation and placement of trajectories in pediatric patients are believed to contribute to a time-dependent accumulation of stereotactic error. Thus, we aim to study the impact of time as a marker of cumulative stereotactic error during robotic sEEG.

METHODS

All patients between October 2018 and June 2022 who underwent robotic sEEG were included. Radial errors at entry and target points as well as depth and Euclidean distance errors were collected for each electrode, excluding those with errors over 10 mm. Target point errors were standardized by planned trajectory length. ANOVA and error rates over time were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 9.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients met inclusion criteria for a total of 539 trajectories. Number of electrodes placed ranged from 6 to 22. Average root mean squared error was 0.45 ± 0.12 mm. Average entry, target, depth, and Euclidean distance errors were 1.12 ± 0.41 mm, 1.46 ± 0.44 mm, -1.06 ± 1.43 mm, and 3.01 ± 0.71 mm, respectively. There was no significant increased error with each sequential electrode placed (entry error P -value = .54, target error P -value = .13, depth error P -value = .22, Euclidean distance P -value = .27).

CONCLUSION

No decremental accuracy over time was observed. This may be secondary to our workflow which prioritizes oblique and longer trajectories first and then into less error-prone trajectories. Further study on the effect of level of training may reveal a novel difference in error rates.

Invasive Epilepsy Monitoring: The Switch from Subdural Electrodes to Stereoelectroencephalography

Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) has experienced an explosion in use due to a shifting understanding of epileptic networks and wider application of minimally invasive epilepsy surgery techniques. Both subdural electrode (SDE) monitoring and SEEG serve important roles in defining the epileptogenic zone, limiting functional deficits, and formulating the most effective surgical plan. Strengths of SEEG include the ability to sample difficult to reach, deep structures of the brain without a craniotomy and without disrupting the dura. SEEG is complementary to minimally invasive epilepsy treatment options and may reduce the treatment gap in patients who are hesitant about craniotomy and surgical resection. Understanding the strengths and limitations of SDE monitoring and SEEG allows epileptologists to choose the best modality of invasive monitoring for each patient living with drug-resistant seizures.

Electrochemical Testing of a New Polyimide Thin Film Electrode for Stimulation, Recording, and Monitoring of Brain Activity

Subdural electrode arrays are used for monitoring cortical activity and functional brain mapping in patients with seizures. Until recently, the only commercially available arrays were silicone-based, whose thickness and lack of conformability could impact their performance. We designed, characterized, manufactured, and obtained FDA clearance for 29-day clinical use (510(k) K192764) of a new thin-film polyimide-based electrode array. This study describes the electrochemical characterization undertaken to evaluate the quality and reliability of electrical signal recordings and stimulation of these new arrays. Two testing paradigms were performed: a short-term active soak with electrical stimulation and a 29-day passive soak. Before and after each testing paradigm, the arrays were evaluated for their electrical performance using Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS), Cyclic Voltammetry (CV) and Voltage Transients (VT). In all tests, the impedance remained within an acceptable range across all frequencies. The different CV curves showed no significant changes in shape or area, which is indicative of stable electrode material. The electrode polarization remained within appropriate limits to avoid hydrolysis.

First Food and Drug Administration Cleared Thin-Film Electrode for Intracranial Stimulation, Recording, and Monitoring of Brain Activity—Part 1: Biocompatibility Testing

Subdural strip and grid invasive electroencephalography electrodes are routinely used for surgical evaluation of patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). Although these electrodes have been in the United States market for decades (first FDA clearance 1985), their fabrication, materials, and properties have hardly changed. Existing commercially available electrodes are made of silicone, are thick (>0.5 mm), and do not optimally conform to brain convolutions. New thin-film polyimide electrodes (0.08 mm) have been manufactured to address these issues. While different thin-film electrodes are available for research use, to date, only one electrode is cleared by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in clinical practice. This study describes the biocompatibility tests that led to this clearance. Biocompatibility was tested using standard methods according to International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 10993. Electrodes and appropriate control materials were bent, folded, and placed in the appropriate extraction vehicles, or implanted. The extracts were used for in vitro and in vivo tests, to assess the effects of any potential extractable and leachable materials that may be toxic to the body. In vitro studies included cytotoxicity tested in L929 cell line, genotoxicity tested using mouse lymphoma assay (MLA) and Ames assay, and hemolysis tested in rabbit whole blood samples. The results indicated that the electrodes were non-cytotoxic, non-mutagenic, non-clastogenic, and non-hemolytic. In vivo studies included sensitization tested in guinea pigs, irritation tested in rabbits, acute systemic toxicity testing in mice, pyrogenicity tested in rabbits, and a prolonged 28-day subdural implant in sheep. The results indicated that the electrodes induced no sensitization and irritation, no weight loss, and no temperature increase. Histological examination of the sheep brain tissue showed no or minimal immune cell accumulation, necrosis, neovascularization, fibrosis, and astrocyte infiltration, with no differences from the control material. In summary, biocompatibility studies indicated that these new thin-film electrodes are appropriate for human use. As a result, the electrodes were cleared by the FDA for use in clinical practice [510(k) K192764], making it the first thin-film subdural electrode to progress from research to clinic. Its readiness as a commercial product ensures availability to all patients undergoing surgical evaluation for DRE.

Single-center cost comparison analysis of stereoelectroencephalography with subdural grid and strip implantation

OBJECTIVE

Use of invasive stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) has gained traction recently. However, scant research has investigated the costs and resource utilization of SEEG compared with subdural grid (SDG)-based techniques in pediatric patients. Here, the authors have presented a retrospective analysis of charges associated with SEEG and SDG monitoring at a single institution.

METHODS

The authors performed a retrospective case series analysis of pediatric patients with similar characteristics in terms of age, sex, seizure etiology, and epilepsy treatment strategy who underwent SEEG or SDG monitoring and subsequent craniotomy for resection of epileptogenic focus at St. Louis Children Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri, between 2013 and 2020. Financial data, including hospital charges, supplies, and professional fees (i.e., those related to anesthesia, neurology, neurosurgery, and critical care), were adjusted for inflation to 2020 US dollars.

RESULTS

The authors identified 18 patients (9 underwent SEEG and 9 underwent SDG) with similar characteristics in terms of age (mean [range] 13.6 [1.9-21.8] years for SDG patients vs 11.9 [2.4-19.6] years for SEEG patients, p = 0.607), sex (4 females underwent SDG vs 6 females underwent SEEG, p = 0.637), and presence of lesion (5 patients with a lesion underwent SDG vs 8 underwent SEEG, p = 0.294). All patients underwent subsequent craniotomy for resection of epileptogenic focus. SEEG patients were more likely to have a history of status epilepticus (p = 0.029). Across 1 hospitalization for each SDG patient and 2 hospitalizations for each SEEG patient, SEEG patients had a significantly shorter mean operating room time (288 vs 356 minutes, p = 0.015), mean length of stay in the ICU (1.0 vs 2.1 days, p < 0.001), and tended to have a shorter overall length of stay in the hospital (8.4 vs 10.6 days, p = 0.086). Both groups underwent invasive monitoring for similar lengths of time (5.2 days for SEEG patients vs 6.4 days for SDG patients, p = 0.257). Time to treatment from the initial invasive monitoring evaluation was significantly longer in SEEG patients (64.6 vs 6.4 days, p < 0.001). Neither group underwent readmission within the first 30 days after hospital discharge. Seizure outcomes and complication rates were similar. After adjustment for inflation, the average total perioperative charges were $104,442 for SDG and $106,291 for SEEG (p = 0.800).

CONCLUSIONS

Even though 2 hospitalizations were required for SEEG and 1 hospitalization was required for SDG monitoring, patients who underwent SEEG had a significantly shorter average length of stay in the ICU and operating room time. Surgical morbidity and outcomes were similar. Total perioperative charges for invasive monitoring and resection were approximately 2% higher for SEEG patients when corrected for inflation, but this difference was not statistically significant.

Robot-assisted stereoelectroencephalography in young children: technical challenges and considerations

Robot-assisted stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG) is frequently employed to localize epileptogenic zones in patients with medically refractory epilepsy (MRE). Its methodology is well described in adults, but less so in children. Given the limited information available on pediatric applications, the objective is to describe the unique technical challenges and considerations of sEEG in the pediatric population. In this report, we describe our institutional experience with the technical aspects of robot-assisted sEEG in an exclusively pediatric epilepsy surgery unit, focusing on pre-, intra-, and post-operative nuances that are particular to the pediatric population. The pediatric population presents several unique challenges in sEEG, including reduced skull thickness relative to adults, incomplete neurologic development, and often special behavioral considerations. Pre-operative selection of putative epileptogenic zones requires careful multidisciplinary decision-making. Intraoperative attention to nuances in positioning, clamp selection, registration, and electrode placement are necessary. Activity considerations and electrode migration and removal are key post-operative considerations. Robot-assisted sEEG is a valuable tool in the armamentarium of techniques to characterize MRE. However, special considerations must be given to the pediatric population to optimize safety and efficacy.

Comparative Effectiveness of Stereotactic Electroencephalography Versus Subdural Grids in Epilepsy Surgery

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to compare the outcomes of subdural electrode (SDE) implantations versus stereotactic electroencephalography (SEEG), the 2 predominant methods of intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) performed in difficult-to-localize drug-resistant focal epilepsy.

METHODS

The Surgical Therapies Commission of the International League Against Epilepsy created an international registry of iEEG patients implanted between 2005 and 2019 with ≥1 year of follow-up. We used propensity score matching to control exposure selection bias and generate comparable cohorts. Study endpoints were: (1) likelihood of resection after iEEG; (2) seizure freedom at last follow-up; and (3) complications (composite of postoperative infection, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, or permanent neurological deficit).

RESULTS

Ten study sites from 7 countries and 3 continents contributed 2,012 patients, including 1,468 (73%) eligible for analysis (526 SDE and 942 SEEG), of whom 988 (67%) underwent subsequent resection. Propensity score matching improved covariate balance between exposure groups for all analyses. Propensity-matched patients who underwent SDE had higher odds of subsequent resective surgery (odds ratio [OR] = 1.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05, 1.84) and higher odds of complications (OR = 2.24, 95% CI 1.34, 3.74; unadjusted: 9.6% after SDE vs 3.3% after SEEG). Odds of seizure freedom in propensity-matched resected patients were 1.66 times higher (95% CI 1.21, 2.26) for SEEG compared with SDE (unadjusted: 55% seizure free after SEEG-guided resections vs 41% after SDE).

INTERPRETATION

In comparison to SEEG, SDE evaluations are more likely to lead to brain surgery in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy but have more surgical complications and lower probability of seizure freedom. This comparative-effectiveness study provides the highest feasible evidence level to guide decisions on iEEG. ANN NEUROL 2021;90:927-939.

Surgical evaluation in children <3 years of age with drug-resistant epilepsy: Patient characteristics, diagnostic utilization, and potential for treatment delays

OBJECTIVE

Drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) occurs at higher rates in children <3 years old. Epilepsy surgery is effective, but rarely utilized in young children despite developmental benefits of early seizure freedom. The present study aims to identify unique patient characteristics and evaluation strategies in children <3 years old who undergo epilepsy surgery evaluation as a means to assess contributors and potential solutions to health care disparities in this group.

METHODS

The Pediatric Epilepsy Research Consortium Epilepsy Surgery Database, a multicentered, cross-sectional collaboration of 21 US pediatric epilepsy centers, collects prospective data on children <18 years of age referred for epilepsy surgery evaluation. We compared patient characteristics, diagnostic utilization, and surgical treatment between children <3 years old and those older undergoing initial presurgical evaluation. We evaluated patient characteristics leading to delayed referral (>1 year) after DRE diagnosis in the very young.

RESULTS

The cohort included 437 children, of whom 71 (16%) were <3 years of age at referral. Children evaluated before the age of 3 years more commonly had abnormal neurological examinations (p = .002) and daily seizures (p = .001). At least one ancillary test was used in 44% of evaluations. Fifty-nine percent were seizure-free following surgery (n = 34), with 35% undergoing limited focal resections. Children with delayed referrals more often had focal aware (p < .001) seizures and recommendation for palliative surgeries (p < .001).

SIGNIFICANCE

There are relatively few studies of epilepsy surgery in the very young. Surgery is effective, but may be disproportionally offered to those with severe presentations. Relatively low utilization of ancillary testing may contribute to reduced surgical therapy for those without evident lesions on magnetic resonance imaging. Despite this, a sizeable portion of patients have favorable outcome after focal epilepsy surgery resections.

Pediatric stereo-electroencephalography: effects of robot assistance and other variables on seizure outcome and complications

OBJECTIVE

The safety of stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) has been investigated; however, most studies have not differentiated pediatric and adult populations, which have different anatomy and physiology. The purpose of this study was to assess SEEG safety in the pediatric setting, focusing on surgical complications and the identification of patient and surgical risk factors, if any. The authors also aimed to determine whether robot assistance in SEEG was associated with a change in practice, surgical parameters, and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively studied all SEEG cases performed in their department from December 2014 to March 2020. They analyzed both demographic and surgical variables and noted the types of surgery-related complications and their management. They also studied the clinical outcomes of a subset of the patients in relation to robot-assisted and non-robot-assisted SEEG.

RESULTS

Sixty-three children had undergone 64 SEEG procedures. Girls were on average 3 years younger than the boys (mean age 11.1 vs 14.1 years, p < 0.01). The overall complication rate was 6.3%, and the complication rate for patients with left-sided electrodes was higher than that for patients with right-sided electrodes (11.1% vs 3.3%), although the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant. The duration of recording was positively correlated to the number of implanted electrodes (r = 0.296, p < 0.05). Robot assistance was associated with a higher number of implanted electrodes (mean 12.6 vs 7.6 electrodes, p < 0.0001). Robot-assisted implantations were more accurate, with a mean error of 1.51 mm at the target compared to 2.98 mm in nonrobot implantations (p < 0.001). Clinical outcomes were assessed in the first 32 patients treated (16 in the nonrobot group and 16 in the robot group), 23 of whom proceeded to further resective surgery. The children who had undergone robot-assisted SEEG had better eventual seizure control following subsequent epilepsy surgery. Of the children who had undergone resective epilepsy surgery, 42% (5/12) in the nonrobot group and 82% (9/11) in the robot group obtained an Engel class IA outcome at 1 year (χ2 = 3.885, p = 0.049). Based on Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, the robot group had a higher seizure-free rate than the nonrobot group at 30 months postoperation (7/11 vs 2/12, p = 0.063). Two complications, whose causes were attributed to the implantation and head-bandaging steps, required surgical intervention. All complications were either transient or reversible.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest single-center, exclusively pediatric SEEG series that includes robot assistance so far. SEEG complications are uncommon and usually transient or treatable. Robot assistance enabled implantation of more electrodes and improved epilepsy surgery outcomes, as compared to those in the non-robot-assisted cases.

Robot-assisted stereoelectroencephalography electrode placement in twenty-three pediatric patients: a high-resolution analysis of individual lead placement time and accuracy at a single institution

PURPOSE

We describe a detailed evaluation of predictors associated with individual lead placement efficiency and accuracy for 261 stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG) electrodes placed for epilepsy monitoring in twenty-three children at our institution.

METHODS

Intra- and post-operative data was used to generate a linear mixed model to investigate predictors associated with three outcomes (lead placement time, lead entry error, lead target error) while accounting for correlated observations from the same patients. Lead placement time was measured using electronic time-stamp records stored by the ROSA software for each individual electrode; entry and target site accuracy was measured using postoperative stereotactic CT images fused with preoperative electrode trajectory planning images on the ROSA computer software. Predictors were selected from a list of variables that included patient demographics, laterality of leads, anatomic location of lead, skull thickness, bolt cap device used, and lead sequence number.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients (11 female, 48%) of mean age 11.7 (± 6.1) years underwent placement of intracranial sEEG electrodes (median 11 electrodes) at our institution over a period of 1 year. There were no associated infections, hemorrhages, or other adverse events, and successful seizure capture was obtained in all monitored patients. The mean placement time for individual electrodes across all patients was 6.56 (± 3.5) min; mean target accuracy was 4.5 (± 3.5) mm. Lesional electrodes were associated with 25.7% (95% CI: 6.7-40.9%, p = 0.02) smaller target point errors. Larger skull thickness was associated with larger error: for every 1-mm increase in skull thickness, there was a 4.3% (95% CI: 1.2-7.5%, p = 0.007) increase in target error. Bilateral lead placement was associated with 26.0% (95% CI: 9.9-44.5%, p = 0.002) longer lead placement time. The relationship between placement time and lead sequence number was nonlinear: it decreased consistently for the first 4 electrodes, and became less pronounced thereafter.

CONCLUSIONS

Variation in sEEG electrode placement efficiency and accuracy can be explained by phenomena both within and outside of operator control. It is important to keep in mind the factors that can lead to better or worse lead placement efficiency and/or accuracy in order to maximize patient safety while maintaining the standard of care.

Pediatric Epilepsy Surgery in Focal and Generalized Epilepsy: Current Trends and Recent Advancements

For a subset of children with medically intractable epilepsy, surgery may provide the best chances of seizure freedom. Whereas the indications for epilepsy surgery are commonly thought to be limited to patients with focal epileptogenic foci, modern imaging and surgical interventions frequently permit successful surgical treatment of generalized epilepsy. Resection continues to be the only potentially curative intervention; however, the advent of various neuromodulation interventions provides an effective palliative strategy for generalized or persistent seizures. Although the risks and benefits vary greatly by type and extent of intervention, the seizure outcomes appear to be uniformly favorable. Advances in both resective and nonresective surgical interventions provide promise for improved seizure freedom, function, and quality of life. This review summarizes the current trends and recent advancements in pediatric epilepsy surgery from diagnostic workup and indications through surgical interventions and postoperative outcomes.