Drug response prediction by ensemble learning and drug-induced gene expression signatures

Optimized models and deep learning methods for drug response prediction in cancer treatments: a review

Recent advancements in deep learning (DL) have played a crucial role in aiding experts to develop personalized healthcare services, particularly in drug response prediction (DRP) for cancer patients. The DL's techniques contribution to this field is significant, and they have proven indispensable in the medical field. This review aims to analyze the diverse effectiveness of various DL models in making these predictions, drawing on research published from 2017 to 2023. We utilized the VOS-Viewer 1.6.18 software to create a word cloud from the titles and abstracts of the selected studies. This study offers insights into the focus areas within DL models used for drug response. The word cloud revealed a strong link between certain keywords and grouped themes, highlighting terms such as deep learning, machine learning, precision medicine, precision oncology, drug response prediction, and personalized medicine. In order to achieve an advance in DRP using DL, the researchers need to work on enhancing the models' generalizability and interoperability. It is also crucial to develop models that not only accurately represent various architectures but also simplify these architectures, balancing the complexity with the predictive capabilities. In the future, researchers should try to combine methods that make DL models easier to understand; this will make DRP reviews more open and help doctors trust the decisions made by DL models in cancer DRP.

Machine learning and bioinformatic analyses link the cell surface receptor transcript levels to the drug response of breast cancer cells and drug off-target effects

Breast cancer responds variably to anticancer therapies, often leading to significant off-target effects. This study proposes that the variability in tumour responses and drug-induced adverse events is linked to the transcriptional profiles of cell surface receptors (CSRs) in breast tumours and normal tissues. We analysed multiple datasets to compare CSR expression in breast tumours with that in non-cancerous human tissues. Our findings correlate the drug responses of breast cancer cell lines with the expression levels of their targeted CSRs. Notably, we identified distinct differences in CSR expression between primary breast tumour subtypes and corresponding cell lines, which may influence drug response predictions. Additionally, we used clinical trial data to uncover associations between CSR gene expression in healthy tissues and the incidence of adverse drug reactions. This integrative approach facilitates the selection of optimal CSR targets for therapy, leveraging cell line dose-responses, CSR expression in normal tissues, and patient adverse event profiles.

NeuPD-A Neural Network-Based Approach to Predict Antineoplastic Drug Response

With the beginning of the high-throughput screening, in silico-based drug response analysis has opened lots of research avenues in the field of personalized medicine. For a decade, many different predicting techniques have been recommended for the antineoplastic (anti-cancer) drug response, but still, there is a need for improvements in drug sensitivity prediction. The intent of this research study is to propose a framework, namely NeuPD, to validate the potential anti-cancer drugs against a panel of cancer cell lines in publicly available datasets. The datasets used in this work are Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC) and Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE). As not all drugs are effective on cancer cell lines, we have worked on 10 essential drugs from the GDSC dataset that have achieved the best modeling results in previous studies. We also extracted 1610 essential oncogene expressions from 983 cell lines from the same dataset. Whereas, from the CCLE dataset, 16,383 gene expressions from 1037 cell lines and 24 drugs have been used in our experiments. For dimensionality reduction, Pearson correlation is applied to best fit the model. We integrate the genomic features of cell lines and drugs' fingerprints to fit the neural network model. For evaluation of the proposed NeuPD framework, we have used repeated K-fold cross-validation with 5 times repeats where K = 10 to demonstrate the performance in terms of root mean square error (RMSE) and coefficient determination (R²). The results obtained on the GDSC dataset that were measured using these cost functions show that our proposed NeuPD framework has outperformed existing approaches with an RMSE of 0.490 and R² of 0.929.

Graph Transformer for Drug Response Prediction

BACKGROUND

Previous models have shown that learning drug features from their graph representation is more efficient than learning from their strings or numeric representations. Furthermore, integrating multi-omics data of cell lines increases the performance of drug response prediction. However, these models have shown drawbacks in extracting drug features from graph representation and incorporating redundancy information from multi-omics data. This paper proposes a deep learning model, GraTransDRP, to better drug representation and reduce information redundancy. First, the Graph transformer was utilized to extract the drug representation more efficiently. Next, Convolutional neural networks were used to learn the mutation, meth, and transcriptomics features. However, the dimension of transcriptomics features was up to 17737. Therefore, KernelPCA was applied to transcriptomics features to reduce the dimension and transform them into a dense presentation before putting them through the CNN model. Finally, drug and omics features were combined to predict a response value by a fully connected network. Experimental results show that our model outperforms some state-of-the-art methods, including GraphDRP and GraOmicDRP.

A systematic literature review for the prediction of anticancer drug response using various machine-learning and deep-learning techniques

Computational methods have gained prominence in healthcare research. The accessibility of healthcare data has greatly incited academicians and researchers to develop executions that help in prognosis of cancer drug response. Among various computational methods, machine-learning (ML) and deep-learning (DL) methods provide the most consistent and effectual approaches to handle the serious aftermaths of the deadly disease and drug administered to the patients. Hence, this systematic literature review has reviewed researches that have investigated drug discovery and prognosis of anticancer drug response using ML and DL algorithms. Fot this purpose, PRISMA guidelines have been followed to choose research papers from Google Scholar, PubMed, and Sciencedirect websites. A total count of 105 papers that align with the context of this review were chosen. Further, the review also presents accuracy of the existing ML and DL methods in the prediction of anticancer drug response. It has been found from the review that, amidst the availability of various studies, there are certain challenges associated with each method. Thus, future researchers can consider these limitations and challenges to develop a prominent anticancer drug response prediction method, and it would be greatly beneficial to the medical professionals in administering non-invasive treatment to the patients.

Graph Convolutional Networks for Drug Response Prediction

BACKGROUND

Drug response prediction is an important problem in computational personalized medicine. Many machine-learning-based methods, especially deep learning-based ones, have been proposed for this task. However, these methods often represent the drugs as strings, which are not a natural way to depict molecules. Also, interpretation (e.g., what are the mutation or copy number aberration contributing to the drug response) has not been considered thoroughly.

METHODS

In this study, we propose a novel method, GraphDRP, based on graph convolutional network for the problem. In GraphDRP, drugs were represented in molecular graphs directly capturing the bonds among atoms, meanwhile cell lines were depicted as binary vectors of genomic aberrations. Representative features of drugs and cell lines were learned by convolution layers, then combined to represent for each drug-cell line pair. Finally, the response value of each drug-cell line pair was predicted by a fully-connected neural network. Four variants of graph convolutional networks were used for learning the features of drugs.

RESULTS

We found that GraphDRP outperforms tCNNS in all performance measures for all experiments. Also, through saliency maps of the resulting GraphDRP models, we discovered the contribution of the genomic aberrations to the responses.

CONCLUSION

Representing drugs as graphs can improve the performance of drug response prediction. Availability of data and materials: Data and source code can be downloaded athttps://github.com/hauldhut/GraphDRP.

Machine learning applications for therapeutic tasks with genomics data

Thanks to the increasing availability of genomics and other biomedical data, many machine learning algorithms have been proposed for a wide range of therapeutic discovery and development tasks. In this survey, we review the literature on machine learning applications for genomics through the lens of therapeutic development. We investigate the interplay among genomics, compounds, proteins, electronic health records, cellular images, and clinical texts. We identify 22 machine learning in genomics applications that span the whole therapeutics pipeline, from discovering novel targets, personalizing medicine, developing gene-editing tools, all the way to facilitating clinical trials and post-market studies. We also pinpoint seven key challenges in this field with potentials for expansion and impact. This survey examines recent research at the intersection of machine learning, genomics, and therapeutic development.

Representation of molecules for drug response prediction

The rapid development of machine learning and deep learning algorithms in the recent decade has spurred an outburst of their applications in many research fields. In the chemistry domain, machine learning has been widely used to aid in drug screening, drug toxicity prediction, quantitative structure-activity relationship prediction, anti-cancer synergy score prediction, etc. This review is dedicated to the application of machine learning in drug response prediction. Specifically, we focus on molecular representations, which is a crucial element to the success of drug response prediction and other chemistry-related prediction tasks. We introduce three types of commonly used molecular representation methods, together with their implementation and application examples. This review will serve as a brief introduction of the broad field of molecular representations.

SWnet: a deep learning model for drug response prediction from cancer genomic signatures and compound chemical structures

Background

One of the major challenges in precision medicine is accurate prediction of individual patient’s response to drugs. A great number of computational methods have been developed to predict compounds activity using genomic profiles or chemical structures, but more exploration is yet to be done to combine genetic mutation, gene expression, and cheminformatics in one machine learning model.

Results

We presented here a novel deep-learning model that integrates gene expression, genetic mutation, and chemical structure of compounds in a multi-task convolutional architecture. We applied our model to the Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC) and Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) datasets. We selected relevant cancer-related genes based on oncology genetics database and L1000 landmark genes, and used their expression and mutations as genomic features in model training. We obtain the cheminformatics features for compounds from PubChem or ChEMBL. Our finding is that combining gene expression, genetic mutation, and cheminformatics features greatly enhances the predictive performance.

Conclusion

We implemented an extended Graph Neural Network for molecular graphs and Convolutional Neural Network for gene features. With the employment of multi-tasking and self-attention functions to monitor the similarity between compounds, our model outperforms recently published methods using the same training and testing datasets.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12859-021-04352-9.

Machine Learning Uses Chemo-Transcriptomic Profiles to Stratify Antimalarial Compounds With Similar Mode of Action

The rapid development of antimalarial resistance motivates the continued search for novel compounds with a mode of action (MoA) different to current antimalarials. Phenotypic screening has delivered thousands of promising hit compounds without prior knowledge of the compounds’ exact target or MoA. Whilst the latter is not initially required to progress a compound in a medicinal chemistry program, identifying the MoA early can accelerate hit prioritization, hit-to-lead optimization and preclinical combination studies in malaria research. The effects of drug treatment on a cell can be observed on systems level in changes in the transcriptome, proteome and metabolome. Machine learning (ML) algorithms are powerful tools able to deconvolute such complex chemically-induced transcriptional signatures to identify pathways on which a compound act and in this manner provide an indication of the MoA of a compound. In this study, we assessed different ML approaches for their ability to stratify antimalarial compounds based on varied chemically-induced transcriptional responses. We developed a rational gene selection approach that could identify predictive features for MoA to train and generate ML models. The best performing model could stratify compounds with similar MoA with a classification accuracy of 76.6 ± 6.4%. Moreover, only a limited set of 50 biomarkers was required to stratify compounds with similar MoA and define chemo-transcriptomic fingerprints for each compound. These fingerprints were unique for each compound and compounds with similar targets/MoA clustered together. The ML model was specific and sensitive enough to group new compounds into MoAs associated with their predicted target and was robust enough to be extended to also generate chemo-transcriptomic fingerprints for additional life cycle stages like immature gametocytes. This work therefore contributes a new strategy to rapidly, specifically and sensitively indicate the MoA of compounds based on chemo-transcriptomic fingerprints and holds promise to accelerate antimalarial drug discovery programs.

Artificial intelligence and machine learning-aided drug discovery in central nervous system diseases: State-of-the-arts and future directions

Neurological disorders significantly outnumber diseases in other therapeutic areas. However, developing drugs for central nervous system (CNS) disorders remains the most challenging area in drug discovery, accompanied with the long timelines and high attrition rates. With the rapid growth of biomedical data enabled by advanced experimental technologies, artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have emerged as an indispensable tool to draw meaningful insights and improve decision making in drug discovery. Thanks to the advancements in AI and ML algorithms, now the AI/ML-driven solutions have an unprecedented potential to accelerate the process of CNS drug discovery with better success rate. In this review, we comprehensively summarize AI/ML-powered pharmaceutical discovery efforts and their implementations in the CNS area. After introducing the AI/ML models as well as the conceptualization and data preparation, we outline the applications of AI/ML technologies to several key procedures in drug discovery, including target identification, compound screening, hit/lead generation and optimization, drug response and synergy prediction, de novo drug design, and drug repurposing. We review the current state-of-the-art of AI/ML-guided CNS drug discovery, focusing on blood-brain barrier permeability prediction and implementation into therapeutic discovery for neurological diseases. Finally, we discuss the major challenges and limitations of current approaches and possible future directions that may provide resolutions to these difficulties.

Exploration of databases and methods supporting drug repurposing: a comprehensive survey

Drug development involves a deep understanding of the mechanisms of action and possible side effects of each drug, and sometimes results in the identification of new and unexpected uses for drugs, termed as drug repurposing. Both in case of serendipitous observations and systematic mechanistic explorations, confirmation of new indications for a drug requires hypothesis building around relevant drug-related data, such as molecular targets involved, and patient and cellular responses. These datasets are available in public repositories, but apart from sifting through the sheer amount of data imposing computational bottleneck, a major challenge is the difficulty in selecting which databases to use from an increasingly large number of available databases. The database selection is made harder by the lack of an overview of the types of data offered in each database. In order to alleviate these problems and to guide the end user through the drug repurposing efforts, we provide here a survey of 102 of the most promising and drug-relevant databases reported to date. We summarize the target coverage and types of data available in each database and provide several examples of how multi-database exploration can facilitate drug repurposing.

Dr.VAE: improving drug response prediction via modeling of drug perturbation effects

Motivation

Individualized drug response prediction is a fundamental part of personalized medicine for cancer. Great effort has been made to discover biomarkers or to develop machine learning methods for accurate drug response prediction in cancers. Incorporating prior knowledge of biological systems into these methods is a promising avenue to improve prediction performance. High-throughput cell line assays of drug-induced transcriptomic perturbation effects are a prior knowledge that has not been fully incorporated into a drug response prediction model yet.

Results

We introduce a unified probabilistic approach, Drug Response Variational Autoencoder (Dr.VAE), that simultaneously models both drug response in terms of viability and transcriptomic perturbations. Dr.VAE is a deep generative model based on variational autoencoders. Our experimental results showed Dr.VAE to do as well or outperform standard classification methods for 23 out of 26 tested Food and Drug Administration-approved drugs. In a series of ablation experiments we showed that the observed improvement of Dr.VAE can be credited to the incorporation of drug-induced perturbation effects with joint modeling of treatment sensitivity.

Availability and implementation

Processed data and software implementation using PyTorch (Paszke et al., 2017) are available at: https://github.com/rampasek/DrVAE.

Supplementary information

Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Deep learning for drug response prediction in cancer

Predicting the sensitivity of tumors to specific anti-cancer treatments is a challenge of paramount importance for precision medicine. Machine learning(ML) algorithms can be trained on high-throughput screening data to develop models that are able to predict the response of cancer cell lines and patients to novel drugs or drug combinations. Deep learning (DL) refers to a distinct class of ML algorithms that have achieved top-level performance in a variety of fields, including drug discovery. These types of models have unique characteristics that may make them more suitable for the complex task of modeling drug response based on both biological and chemical data, but the application of DL to drug response prediction has been unexplored until very recently. The few studies that have been published have shown promising results, and the use of DL for drug response prediction is beginning to attract greater interest from researchers in the field. In this article, we critically review recently published studies that have employed DL methods to predict drug response in cancer cell lines. We also provide a brief description of DL and the main types of architectures that have been used in these studies. Additionally, we present a selection of publicly available drug screening data resources that can be used to develop drug response prediction models. Finally, we also address the limitations of these approaches and provide a discussion on possible paths for further improvement. Contact:  mrocha@di.uminho.pt.

Anticancer Drug Response Prediction in Cell Lines Using Weighted Graph Regularized Matrix Factorization

Precision medicine has become a novel and rising concept, which depends much on the identification of individual genomic signatures for different patients. The cancer cell lines could reflect the “omic” diversity of primary tumors, based on which many works have been carried out to study the cancer biology and drug discovery both in experimental and computational aspects. In this work, we presented a novel method to utilize weighted graph regularized matrix factorization (WGRMF) for inferring anticancer drug response in cell lines. We constructed a p-nearest neighbor graph to sparsify drug similarity matrix and cell line similarity matrix, respectively. Using the sparsified matrices in the graph regularization terms, we performed matrix factorization to generate the latent matrices for drug and cell line. The graph regularization terms including neighbor information could help to exclude the noisy ingredient and improve the prediction accuracy. The 10-fold cross-validation was implemented, and the Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC), root-mean-square error (RMSE), PCCsr, and RMSEsr averaged over all drugs were calculated to evaluate the performance of WGRMF. The results on the Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC) dataset are 0.64 ± 0.16, 1.37 ± 0.35, 0.73 ± 0.14, and 1.71 ± 0.44 for PCC, RMSE, PCCsr, and RMSEsr in turn. And for the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) dataset, WGRMF got results of 0.72 ± 0.09, 0.56 ± 0.19, 0.79 ± 0.07, and 0.69 ± 0.19, respectively. The results showed the superiority of WGRMF compared with previous methods. Besides, based on the prediction results using the GDSC dataset, three types of case studies were carried out. The results from both cross-validation and case studies have shown the effectiveness of WGRMF on the prediction of drug response in cell lines.