A multi-institutional review of outcomes of endometrial stromal sarcoma

The value of surgery and the prognostic factors for patients with recurrent low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: a retrospective study of 38 patients

OBJECTIVE

As an indolent malignant tumor, the long-term management of low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LGESS) patients required awareness, especially the management of recurrences. Unfortunately, few studies focused on the treatment of recurrent LGESS. Our study aimed to investigate the prognostic factors and the value of recurrent surgery on recurrent LGESS.

METHODS

This retrospective study consecutively recruited patients with pathologically diagnosed recurrent LGESS at our center from April 1, 2004 to April 1, 2020.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 137.0 months (95% confidence interval=85.4-188.6), the 5-year cumulative survival rate of the cohort of 38 patients with recurrent LGESS was 71.1%. The median overall survival (OS) and post-recurrence survival (PRS) was 156 and 89.0 months. Survival analysis showed that patients with younger age, positive estrogen receptor (ER) and optimal abdominopelvic debulking in the first recurrent surgery had better prognosis (p<0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that optimal abdominopelvic debulking in the first recurrent surgery was the only independent prognostic factor for OS and PRS (OS=216.0/35.0 months, hazard ratio [HR]=5.319, p=0.034; PRS=not reached/4.0 months, HR=10.900, p=0.006). There was no significant difference in OS and PRS between patients recurred only once and those recurred at least twice (p>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The prognosis of recurrent LGESS was favorable. Optimal debulking of no residual tumor in abdominal and pelvic cavity should be the first choice of treatment for recurrent patients, while preservation of ovary or fertility should not be recommended.

A rare case report of low-grade endometrial sarcoma: A surgical tale from Himalayas

INTRODUCTION

In the context of female genital tract malignancy, uterine sarcoma is considered the rarest form of the disease. Despite the inert nature of low-grade endometrial sarcoma, they must be meticulously diagnosed on time, with an exact grading of the severity and staging of the disease, which further guides the treatment modality and prognosis.

CASE SUMMARY

A married Asian female without any significant past medical and surgical history complained of abdominal distension and discomfort, which was progressive in nature, for which a radiological assessment was made that showed features suggestive of endometrial sarcoma. Total abdominal hysterectomy with sapingoopherectomy was done without any perioperative complications. Histology further confirmed the diagnosis. Post-operatively, the patient had an unremarkable hospital stay and was discharged home.

DISCUSSION

Endometrial stromal sarcoma is one of the rare malignant entities presenting usually in late adult females, but sometimes it can present at an earlier age as well. Abdominal masses in females, although usually overlooked as benign, can sometimes be associated with a malignant picture. Low-grade endometrial sarcomas have been seen to masquerade other minor benign cases, such as leiomyoma. Despite the rarity of such malignant conditions, diagnosis and management are rather straightforward, and post-operative patient prognosis has been found to be rewarding.

CONCLUSION

Among the uterine sarcoma cases, endometrial sarcoma comes under the malignant disease of the least occurrence. Compared to other malignant conditions, these patients present with minor symptoms like discomfort, which may go unchecked. The major factor that should be noted is the on-time diagnosis and appropriate choice of treatment modality. Overall, despite a minute prevalence and difficult diagnosis, the prognosis of the patient is rather good.

Gynecological sarcomas, surgical management: primary, metastatic, and recurrent disease

Adult-type gynecological soft tissue and visceral sarcomas are rare tumors, with an estimated incidence of 13% of all sarcomas and 4% of all gynecological malignancies. They most often develop in the uterus (83%), followed by the ovaries (8%), vulva and vagina (5%), and other gynecological organs (2%). The objective of this review is to provide an overview of the current management of gynecological sarcomas, according to international guidelines. The management of gynecological sarcomas should follow the recommendations for the management of soft tissue and visceral sarcomas. Centralizing cases in expert centers improves patient survival, both for the diagnostic phase and for multidisciplinary therapeutic management. In the case of pelvic soft tissue sarcomas, a radiological biopsy is essential before any surgical decision is taken. In the case of a myometrial tumour which may correspond to a sarcoma, if conservative surgery such as myomectomy or morcellation is planned, an ultrasound-guided biopsy with pathological analysis including comparative genomic hybridization analysis must be carried out. In all cases, en bloc surgery, without rupture, is mandatory. Many rare histological subtypes require specific surgical management.

A Case Report of Uterine Müllerian Adenosarcoma With Sarcomatous Overgrowth

Uterine adenosarcoma remains a highly aggressive tumor and is less described in the literature, with an unfavorable prognosis and an increased risk of local and distant recurrence. However, surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy offer local control of the disease, and overall survival remains reduced. We report the case of a 79-year-old patient with stage IIIB uterine adenosarcoma, confirmed by immunohistochemistry and initially diagnosed with postmenopausal metrorrhagia. The patient was managed through a multimodal treatment by conducting a multidisciplinary consultation.

A case of a recurrent low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma extending to the inferior vena cava (IVC) after the primary fertility-sparing surgery

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

A case of Low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS) invading the great vessels is rare.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 34-year-old female who had no past history presented to a previous hospital with abdominal distension. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a 15 cm pelvic mass beside the uterus, and only the pelvic mass was removed at the surgery. The tumor was judged to be a LG-ESS. The patient chose to be observed to preserve her fertility, and no adjuvant treatment was undertaken. Two years later, she was referred to our hospital due to recurrence of the pelvic mass. Enhanced computed tomography revealed a large tumor in the vena cava which extended from the left internal iliac vein and which originated from the pelvic tumor. An operation was performed by a multidisciplinary team. Complete resection of the tumor was achieved with a radical hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, removal of recurrent pelvic masses and the intravascular tumor. We diagnosed a recurrence of LG-ESS. She received a postoperative adjuvant therapy of LG-ESS.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

Patients with fertility-sparing treatment had higher recurrence rates. In cases of tumor intravenous extension, we should make every effort to extract the tumor to avoid sudden death.

CONCLUSION

This case highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary approach in treating this rare tumor with intravascular extension. In particular, patients with LG-ESS who receive fertility-sparing surgery should undertake postoperative chemotherapy or radiotherapy in order to reduce the risk of recurrence, as was in this case.

Prognostic factors in undifferentiated uterine sarcoma: a subanalysis of the SARCUT study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to analyze the prognostic factors related to the recurrence rate and overall survival of patients with undifferentiated uterine sarcoma.

METHODS

An international multicenter study involving 43 international centers, the SARCUT study, collected 966 uterine sarcoma cases; among them 39 cases corresponded to undifferentiated uterine sarcoma and where included in the present subanalysis. The risk factors related to the oncological outcomes where analyzed.

RESULTS

The median age of the patients was 63 (range 14-85) years. Seventeen (43.5%) patients presented FIGO stage I. The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 15.3% and 12-months disease-free survival (DFS) 41%. FIGO stage I was significantly associated with a better prognosis. In addition, patients who received adjuvant radiotherapy showed significant longer disease-free survival compared to those without adjuvant radiotherapy (20.5 vs. 4.0 months, respectively; p = 0.04) and longer overall survival (34.7 vs. 18.2 months, respectively; p = 0.05). Chemotherapy administration was associated with shorter DFS (HR 4.41, 95% CI 1.35-14.43, p = 0.014). Persistent disease after primary treatment (HR = 6.86, 95% CI 1.51-31.09, p = 0.012) and FIGO stage IV (HR 4.12, 95%CI 1.37-12.44, p = 0.011) showed significant worse prognosis for OS.

CONCLUSION

FIGO stage seems to be the most important prognostic factor in patients with undifferentiated uterine sarcoma. Adjuvant radiotherapy seems to be significantly associated also to a better disease-free and overall survival. On the contrary, the role of chemotherapy administration remains unclear since was associated to a shorted DFS.

Utero-ovarian low grade endometrial stromal sarcoma, a case report

INTRODUCTION

Endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) is a rare malignancy of uterine in middle aged women. There are numerous subtypes for ESS which share the same clinical picture of uterine bleeding and pelvic pain. Consequently, diagnosis and treatment modalities of LG-ESS with metastasis are challenging. However, both molecular and immunological study of samples can be useful.

CASE PRESENTATION

In this case study, we report a 52-year-old woman presenting with the chief complaint of unusual uterine bleeding. There was no specific finding in her past medical history. The CT study revealed enlarged bilateral ovary with a significantly large left ovarian mass and suspicious mass in uterus. By the diagnosis of ovarian mass, patient went under total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO), greater omentectomy, and appendectomy followed by post-op hormone therapy. Her follow-up was uneventful. The IHC and pathological study of samples revealed incidental LG-ESS uterus mass with metastasis to ovaries despite her primary diagnosis.

DISCUSSION

LG-ESS has low metastasis rate. Surgical modalities and neoadjuvant therapies are recommended base on the stage of ESS. In the following study, we represent a case of incidental LG-ESS with bilateral ovarian invasion who was initially diagnosed as an ovarian mass.

CONCLUSION

Our patient was successfully managed by surgical intervention. Despite scarcity of LG-ESS, it is advised to consider LG-ESS as a differential diagnosis in management of patients with a uterus mass with bilateral ovarian involvement.

Uterine sarcomas: clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up, by Spanish group for research on sarcomas (GEIS)

Uterine sarcomas are very infrequent and heterogeneous entities. Due to its rarity, pathological diagnosis, surgical management, and systemic treatment are challenging. Treatment decision process in these tumors should be taken in a multidisciplinary tumor board. Available evidence is low and, in many cases, based on case series or clinical trials in which these tumors have been included with other soft tissue sarcoma. In these guidelines, we have tried to summarize the most relevant evidence in the diagnosis, staging, pathological disparities, surgical management, systemic treatment, and follow-up of uterine sarcomas.

Sarcomes du stroma endométrial de bas grade : référentiels de prise en charge du GSF-GETO/NETSARC+ et du groupe TMRG

Low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS) accounts for approximately 15% of all uterine sarcomas. Median age of patients is around 50 years and half of the patients are premenopausal. In all, 60% of cases present with FIGO stage I disease. Preoperatively radiologic findings of ESS are not specific. Pathological diagnosis remains essential. This review aimed to present the French guidelines for low grade ESS treatment within the Groupe sarcome français - Groupe d'étude des tumeurs osseuse (GSF-GETO)/NETSARC+ and tumeur maligne rare gynécologique (TMRG) networks. Treatments should be validated in multidisciplinary team involved in sarcomas or rare gynecologic tumors. Hysterectomy is the cornerstone of treatment for localized ESS, and morcellation should be avoided. Systematic lymphadenectomy in ESS does not improve the outcome and is not recommended. Leaving the ovaries in situ in stage I tumors could be discussed for young women. Adjuvant hormonal treatment could be considered, for two years for stage I with morcellation or stage II and livelong for stages III or IV. Nevertheless, several questions remain, such as optimal doses, regimens (progestins or aromatase inhibitors) and duration of therapy. Tamoxifen is contraindicated. Secondary cytoreductive surgery if feasible for recurrent disease, appears to be an acceptable approach. Systemic treatment for recurrent or metastatic disease is mainly hormonal, with or without surgery.

Low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma with intravenous thrombus extension: a multidisciplinary surgical challenge

Low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS) usually exhibits indolent behavior, often misdiagnosed and is associated with a favorable prognosis [1]. Despite the indolent nature of LG-ESS, recurrence is common, the risk is as high as 1 in 3 to 1 in 2 [2]. The behavior of such tumors can lead to invade blood vessels [3]. An intravascular tumor is associated with direct risk of sudden death from pulmonary embolism. There are very few reported cases with clinically obvious intravascular extension. Chemotherapy, radiotherapy and hormone therapy are adjuvant treatments that have not been able to demonstrate a definitive benefit in survival [4]. We want to take advantage of the opportunity, so far unpublished, to demonstrate with this case the surgical challenge described step by step, as well as to demonstrate the importance of surgery as the only curative treatment even in extended intravascular disease [5]. Here in, we present the surgical challenge of a LG-ESS in a 59-year old woman with iliac and cava vein tumoral thrombus extension. We performed a tumoral thrombectomy and vascular repair, with a pelvic exenteration and double barrel wet colostomy. After performing pelvic exenteration, the thrombus with intravascular involvement was addressed at 2 points: inferior cava vein and right common iliac vein with the extraction of the entire thrombus. These defects are corrected by angioplasty and venorrhaphy, respectively. The surgery got a complete cytoreduction. It lasted 290 minutes, with 430 mL blood loss. In patients with LG-ESS, cytoreduction is a reliable option even in extended metastatic disease.

ESR1 hotspot mutations in endometrial stromal sarcoma with high-grade transformation and endocrine treatment

High-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas (HGESSs) are more aggressive and have higher rates of resistance to endocrine therapy than low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas (LGESSs). The pathogenesis of hormonal resistance in these lesions has yet to be defined. Here we sought to histologically and genetically characterize 3 LGESSs and their recurrences that underwent histologic high-grade transformation following endocrine therapy. For this, DNA from primary tumors and select subsequent recurrences were subject to massively parallel sequencing targeting 468 cancer-related genes. Somatic mutation analyses were performed using validated bioinformatics methods. In addition, RNA from each case was evaluated for the presence of gene fusions using targeted RNA-sequencing. All patients initially presented with LGESS, developed HGESS recurrences, and received at least 2 lines of hormonal suppressive therapy. Gene fusions classically described as associated with LGESS were identified in all 3 cases, including JAZF1-PHF1, EPC1-PHF1 and JAZF1-SUZ12 fusions for Cases 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Targeted sequencing analysis revealed that none of the primary LGESS, however the HGESS recurrences of Cases 1 and 3, and the LGESS and HGESS recurrences of Case 2 post endocrine treatment harbored ESR1 p.Y537S hotspot mutations. These ESR1 ligand-binding domain mutations have been found as a mechanism of acquired endocrine resistance in breast cancer. Also, a reduction in estrogen receptor (ER) expression was observed in recurrences. Our findings suggest that the ESR1 p.Y537S hotspot mutation in LGESS with histologic high-grade transformation may be associated with endocrine resistance in these lesions. Furthermore, our data suggest that genetic analyses may be performed in recurrent LGESS following hormonal therapy, development of high-grade morphology, and/or altered/diminished ER expression.

Low-Grade Uterine Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma: Prognostic Analysis of Clinico-Pathological Characteristics, Surgical Management, and Adjuvant Treatments. Experience From Two Referral Centers

Objective

Low-grade uterine endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS) is a rare tumor characterized by an overall good survival but showing a indolent behavior and a variable risk of recurrence. There is no clear consensus on the optimal management of these tumors and no prognostic or predictive factors have been established. With this study, we evaluated the prognostic relevance of several clinical, surgical, and pathological features in patients affected by LG-ESS to identify risk factors associated with recurrence.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 52 LG-ESS cases, treated from January 1st, 1994, to May 31st, 2020, in two referral centers. The relationship between recurrence and clinicopathological characteristics as well as surgical treatment was investigated. Risk of recurrence and disease-free survival (DFS) were estimated by Cox regression and the Kaplan-Meier analysis, respectively.

Results

Of 52 patients with LG-ESS, 8 experienced recurrence (15%). The median follow-up was 100 months (SD ± 96, range: 15–336). By univariate analysis, fragmentation/morcellation, tumor size, FIGO stage, higher mitotic count, presence of necrosis, and lymphovascular space invasion (LSVI) resulted associated with a poorer outcome. Conversely, the surgical modality (laparotomic vs laparoscopic and hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy vs local excision) and pelvic lymphadenectomy were not. Even the different modalities of adjuvant therapy (hormonal therapy, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy) showed no prognostic significance. Tumor fragmentation/morcellation and higher mitotic count resulted independent prognostic variables at multivariate analysis.

Conclusions

This data supports the avoidance of any type of morcellation if LG-ESS is suspected preoperatively. Higher mitotic count and, possibly, tumor size, advanced FIGO stage, necrosis, and LVSI could be exploited to tailor the adjuvant therapy, but these results need to be confirmed in larger prospective studies.

A giant metastatic low-grade endometrial sarcoma requiring surgical management

Introduction and importance

Low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas are relatively rare tumors. We here report a case of a woman presenting with a giant metastatic low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma with thromboembolic complications requiring urgent surgical management.

Case presentation

A 58-year-old obese female was admitted, with a voluminous abdominopelvic mass, due to complications related to its size and extent. The tumor derived from the uterus and invaded the ureters, bladder and rectum. It compressed the right iliac vessels causing both deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. She developed a painful irreducible umbilical. We proceeded with a debulking surgery (hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy). Histological findings were consistent with a low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma.

Clinical discussion

Low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas are generally low-grade malignant neoplasms with an indolent clinical course. Surgery is the cornerstone of treatment. In low-income countries, malignancies are more often diagnosed at a late stage, which limits therapeutic options. Cytoreduction is recommended in advanced tumors with extrauterine manifestation, depending on symptoms and with palliative intent.

Conclusion

Low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas are indolent uterine malignancies with metastatic potential. Even in advanced cases, cytoreduction must be considered.

•

Endometrial stromal sarcomas (ESS) are relatively rare tumors.

•

They are classified into three categories: low-grade, high-grade, and undifferentiated.

•

Staging is the most important prognostic factor.

•

Cytoreduction surgery is recommended even in advanced tumors.

•

Late presentation of cancers is commonplace in most low-income countries.

Uterine Sarcomas: How to Navigate an Ever-Growing List of Subtypes

Uterine sarcomas are rare mesenchymal tumors that are aggressive cancers. The rarity of these tumors, and consequently limited prospective data, has made surgical management of uterine sarcomas challenging. One major obstacle in the management of uterine sarcomas is establishing the diagnosis prior to surgery, which is crucial for appropriate intraoperative management. This paper serves to review aspects of surgical management of uterine sarcomas that remain unanswered. Distinguishing common benign myomas from rare uterine sarcomas is important for operative planning and subspecialty care because benign myomas are frequently managed with minimally invasive hysterectomy or myomectomy, whereas the mainstay of management of uterine sarcomas is hysterectomy without specimen fragmentation. Preoperative clinical presentation, serum studies, imaging, and histologic examination all have limitations in establishing a preoperative diagnosis. In addition, patients are often of reproductive age and desire fertility preservation. Although surgery remains the cornerstone for management, high-quality data guiding best practices are sparse. Morcellation should be avoided. Expert pathologic review, imaging to assess for metastatic disease, and consideration of hormone receptor testing are advisable. Recent data have further informed surgical approach and fertility preservation in early-stage disease, but controversy remains. Despite substantial advancement in the medical management of uterine sarcomas, surgical management of uterine sarcomas remain challenging. Larger studies with long-term follow-up are needed to guide fertility preservation surgery options, both local resection and ovarian preservation, further in young women. Development of novel methods to differentiate between benign and malignant uterine masses is needed.

Evaluating the role of aromatase inhibitors in the treatment of low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas

•

AIs may offer prolonged disease stability even in metastatic ESS, but response rates are modest.

•

After disease progression on one AI, some patients may benefit from trial of a different AI.

•

Optimal duration of therapy is unclear; results of a phase 2 study on interruption vs maintenance of AI in LGESS are awaited.

Objectives

Endometrial stromal sarcomas (ESS) are rare, accounting for < 1% of all uterine malignancies. Treatment has been guided by small case series and retrospective studies. Endocrine therapy is used in both adjuvant and metastatic settings. Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are widely used in clinical practice. We sought to evaluate clinical outcomes of AI use in the largest cohort of patients with LGESS to date.

Methods

We performed a retrospective study of patients with LGESS treated with an AI at our institution from 1/1998–12/2020. Response was evaluated using RECIST 1.1. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate median progression-free (PFS) and overall (OS) survival.

Results

Forty patients were identified. Treatment was well tolerated, with 57.5% experiencing adverse effects. The most common were arthralgias (12 patients, 30%) and hot flashes (9, 22.5%). Two of 11 patients with RECIST-evaluable imaging experienced a partial response to treatment. Median PFS for the entire cohort was 79.2 months (95% CI 39.7 months to NE); the 5-year PFS rate was 59.6% (95% CI 41.8% to 73.6, p = 0.065). Median follow-up for the 29 survivors was 97.9 months (range: 12.6–226.7). The 5-year OS rate was 81.5% (95% CI 64.9–90.7%). One patient who discontinued AI after 10 years of treatment recurred 1 year later.

Conclusion

AIs were well tolerated and offered periods of prolonged disease stability, even in the metastatic setting. Our study suggests, however, that response rates may be lower than previously reported. Data on optimal duration of treatment is needed, but the rarity of LGESS is an obstacle to conducting large clinical trials.

New Insights into Hormonal Therapies in Uterine Sarcomas

Simple Summary

Uterine sarcomas are rare mesenchymal malignant cancers, and surgery represents the mainstay of treatment for early-stage disease. In metastatic setting, uterine sarcomas’ treatment includes palliative surgery, a metastases resection, chemotherapy and targeted therapy. Hormonal therapies may also represent an effective option. Frequently, ER and PR are highly expressed in uterine sarcomas patients and they represent a favourable prognostic factor associated with improved overall survival. The scope of the present review is to report the existing evidence and future perspectives on hormonal therapy in uterine sarcomas, with a special focus on aromatase inhibitors, progestins and gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues, in order to clarify their potential role in daily clinical practice.

Abstract

Uterine sarcoma (US) is a rare mesenchymal malignant cancer type, accounting for 3–7% of uterine malignancies. US prognosis is still poor due to high local and distant recurrence rates. As for molecular features, US may present variable oestrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) expressions, mostly depending on histotype and grading. Surgery represents the mainstay of treatment for early-stage disease, while the role of adjuvant chemotherapy or local radiotherapy is still debated and defined on the basis of histotype, tumour grading and stage. In metastatic setting, uterine sarcomas’ treatment includes palliative surgery, a metastases resection, chemotherapy, hormonal therapy and targeted therapy. As for the chemotherapy regimen used, drugs that are considered most effective are doxorubicin (combined with ifosfamide or alone), gemcitabine combined with docetaxel and, more recently, trabectedin or pazopanib. Hormonal therapies, including aromatase inhibitors (AIs), progestins and gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues (GnRH-a) may also represent an effective option, in particular for low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LGESS), due to their favourable toxicity profile and patients’ compliance, while their role is still under investigation in uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS), high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (HGESS), undifferentiated uterine sarcoma (USS) and other rarer US. The present review aims to analyse the existing evidence and future perspectives on hormonal therapies in US, in order to clarify their potential role in daily clinical practice.

Prognostic Value of Ki-67 Index in Patients With Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma

Objective

The Ki-67 index is used to evaluate cell proliferation activity, which is related to tumor progression, metastasis, and prognosis. We aimed to explore the prognostic value of Ki-67 index in endometrial stromal sarcoma and to explore the optimal cut-off value of Ki-67 index for predicting recurrent endometrial stromal sarcoma.

Methods

A total of 82 patients with endometrial stromal sarcoma who were treated in our hospital were collected. Clinicopathological data of these patients were retrospectively analyzed. Ki-67 index was detected by the immunohistochemical method. Receiver operating characteristic curve and the Youden index were performed to determine the optimal cut-off value of Ki-67 index for predicting recurrent endometrial stromal sarcoma. The Cox regression was performed to analyze risk factors affecting prognosis of endometrial stromal sarcoma. The Kaplan–Meier method and Log-rank test were performed to analyze the survival of patients.

Results

The optimal cut-off value of Ki-67 index for predicting recurrent endometrial stromal sarcoma was 35%. The results of univariate analysis showed that high Ki-67 index (≥35%) was statistically significantly bound up with shorter progress free survival and overall survival. The results of multivariate analysis showed that Ki-67 index (P = 0.001) and ovarian preservation (P = 0.040) were independent prognostic factors of progress free survival.

Conclusions

A Ki-67 index cut-off of 35% was optimal for predicting recurrent endometrial stromal sarcoma. Ki-67 index may be a useful prognostic marker in endometrial stromal sarcoma.

Clinicopathological characteristics and treatment of patients with high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: A retrospective study of 40 cases

To investigate the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (HG-ESS).The clinicopathological characteristics, treatments, and prognostic information of consecutive HG-ESS patients were collected from medical records and then evaluated.A total of 40 women were included in the analysis. The immunohistochemical profiles indicated that HG-ESS tumors tend to be locally or weakly positive for vimentin (100%) and CD10 (72.0%) but mostly negative for desmin (7.7%) and AE1/AE3 (9.1%). The progression-free survival intervals and the clinical benefit rates of patients receiving radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy were slightly longer and higher than those receiving simple observation (progression-free survival: 6 and 5 months vs 2 months; clinical benefit rate: 83.3% and 75.0% vs 28.6%). The 1-year disease-specific survival (DSS) rate was 62.7%. Tumor size, myometrial invasion, lymphovascular space invasion, cervical involvement, Federation International of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, and residual disease all significantly affected the DSS rate (P < .001, =.002, <.001, =.004, <.001, and <.001, respectively). For patients with stage I disease, the 1-year DSS rate was as high as 91.7%, in contrast to 66.7%, 26.7%, and 0% for those with stage II, III, and IV disease, respectively.HG-ESS is associated with an adverse prognosis. FIGO stage could effectively predict the prognosis of patients with this lethal disease. Immunohistochemical markers, vimentin+/CD10+ (local or very weak), in combination with desmin-/AE1/AE3-, may be helpful for improving the diagnostic accuracy of this lethal condition. The therapeutic roles of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy warrant further investigation.

Primary low-grade extrauterine endometrial stromal sarcoma: analysis of 10 cases with a review of the literature

Background

This study aimed to analyze the clinical and pathological features of extrauterine endometrial stromal sarcoma (EESS) and explore an effective therapeutic regimen to reduce the recurrence rate in low-grade EESS patients.

Methods

Ten LG-EESS patients who were treated at the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Cancer Institute and Hospital from June 1999 to June 2019 were collected and analyzed.

Results

(1) Patient demographics are summarized in manuscript. Preoperative CA125 examination showed that 8 patients had a median level of 49.5 U/L (15.4–168.0 U/L). (2) All ten patients underwent tumor cytoreductive surgery. Five patients underwent optimal tumor resection and achieved an R0 resection. After the initial surgery, 7 patients who had multiple metastasis were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy, 2 patients with vaginal ESS were treated with chemotherapy and radiation therapy, and 6 patients with ER/PR positive received hormone therapy with or without chemotherapy. (2) Most EESS patients had multiple tumors. The omentum was the most commonly affected site, followed by the ovaries. (3) The median follow-up was 94 (range: 27–228) months, and recurrence was observed in 3 patients (n = 10, 30%) who underwent non-optimal surgery and no hormone therapy. The 5-year and 10-year DFS rates were both 70%, as shown in Fig. 2. OS was both 100% at 5 and 10 years.

Conclusion

As a conclusion, EESS is a rare disease and LG-EESS has a good prognosis. Surgery remains the available treatment for patients. LG-EESS has a risk of late recurrence which requires a long-term follow-up. With a limited sample size, our study shows optimal tumor reductive surgery and adjuvant hormone therapy may significantly reduce the risk of recurrence.

Low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma in a young woman diagnosed after resection of endometrial polyp-like lesions: A case report

Low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS) is a rare tumor that mostly occurs in perimenopausal women. Treatment with total hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is recommended, although fertility preservation or ovarian preservation may be considered in younger patients. The present study reports a case of LG-ESS in a young woman diagnosed after resection of endometrial polyp-like lesions. A 26-year-old nulligravid woman was referred to our hospital after being diagnosed with endometrial polyps. Hysteroscopic endometrial polypectomy was performed twice, and LG-ESS was suspected on postoperative pathological examination. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a tumor 5-cm in diameter on the right side of the uterus. In light of the young age of the patient, tumorectomy was first performed, and postoperative pathological diagnosis was LG-ESS with the positive resection margin. After thorough discussion with the patient about fertility preservation and recurrence risk, a total abdominal hysterectomy and ovarian preservation was performed. Medroxyprogesterone therapy was performed postoperatively and no recurrence was observed for 2 years.

Primary ovarian high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: a case report

Background

Primary ovarian high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma is a very rare disease. Even though it has poor prognosis, the gold standard treatment has not been established owing to its rarity. This report aimed to present therapeutic options for primary ovarian high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma.

Case presentation

A 49-year-old Asian woman presented with disseminated intravascular coagulation due to ruptured primary high-grade ovarian endometrial stromal sarcoma with multiple intraperitoneal metastases. After the initial surgery, the patient underwent adjuvant chemotherapy with three courses of Adriamycin (75 mg/m²). We performed the secondary debulking operation including total hysterectomy, metastasectomy, omentectomy, peritonectomy, appendectomy, and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (paclitaxel 175 mg/m²). Currently she has been alive for 28 months under a new chemotherapy regimen.

Conclusion

We suggest cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy could be a therapeutic option for primary high-grade ovarian endometrial stromal sarcoma with peritoneal dissemination.

NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Uterine Neoplasms, Version 3.2021

The NCCN Guidelines for Uterine Neoplasms provide recommendations for diagnostic workup, clinical staging, and treatment options for patients with endometrial cancer or uterine sarcoma. These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on the recent addition of molecular profiling information to aid in accurate diagnosis, classification, and treatment of uterine sarcomas.

CT, MRI, and FDG-PET imaging findings of low-grade extrauterine endometrial stromal sarcoma arising from the mesentery: A case report

Endometrial stromal sarcoma is a rare uterine mesenchymal neoplasm, and extrauterine endometrial stromal sarcoma is even rarer, with a limited number of case reports. In the present report, we present a case of low-grade extrauterine endometrial stromal sarcoma originating from the mesentery in a 49-year-old woman, without endometrial stromal sarcoma in the uterus or evidence of endometriosis. The tumor was diagnosed using recombination of the JAZF1 gene by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography showed a 13 cm, primarily polycystic, mass containing a contrast-enhancing solid component with restricted diffusion and mild 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake. A large cystic component may be a characteristic feature of extrauterine endometrial stromal sarcoma, given the low pressure from the surrounding tissues.

A Rare Case of Intestinal Low-Grade Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma With Glandular Differentiation and Associated Endometriosis

Endometrial stromal sarcoma is a rare tumour. It is even rarer to find it arising in the background of endometriosis in an extrauterine location. This case report describes a case of missed diagnosis of intestinal extra-uterine endometrial stromal sarcoma associated with endometriosis, and the subsequent presentation with distant metastases. The potential pitfalls are highlighted and differential diagnoses are discussed.

Adjuvant Radiotherapy Improved Survival in Stage I to II Low-Grade Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma: A Retrospective Study of 152 Cases

Objective

Low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS) is a rare gynecological tumor. Whether adjuvant radiotherapy benefits survival in patients with resected early-stage ESS remains controversial. This study was designed to explore the role of adjuvant radiotherapy in stage I to II LG-ESS.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed patients with stage I to II LG-ESS in our center from Jan. 1998 to Feb. 2018. All patients underwent a total hysterectomy and postoperative radiotherapy was administrated based on clinical and pathological characteristics.

Results

A total of 152 patients with stage I to II resected LG-ESS were included. Forty patients received adjuvant radiotherapy (RT group) while 112 patients did not receive adjuvant radiotherapy (no RT group). The baseline characteristics of the two groups were comparable, except that the proportion of stage II patients in the RT group was higher than that in the no RT group (32.5% vs. 11.6%, in RT vs. no RT groups, respectively; p = 0.003). For both patient groups, median overall survival was not reached. The median disease-free survival (DFS) was 144 months. Radiotherapy was associated with significantly improved DFS (92 months vs. not reached in RT vs. no RT groups, respectively; p = 0.008) and pelvic failure-free survival (PFFS) (92 months vs. not reached in RT vs. no RT groups, respectively; p=0.004). Subgroup analysis revealed that RT benefited survival most among patients with stage IB to IIB disease. Adjuvant radiotherapy significantly reduced the pelvic recurrence rate (10.0%, 4/40 vs. 28.6%, 32/112, p = 0.018). No radiotherapy-induced grade 4 to 5 toxicity was observed.

Conclusion

For patients with stage I to II LG-ESS, adjuvant radiotherapy showed significant improvement in DFS and PFFS with tolerable adverse effects, especially in patients with stage IB to IIB disease.

High-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma versus undifferentiated uterine sarcoma: a Turkish uterine sarcoma group study-001

OBJECTIVE

Prognostic factors associated with high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (HGESS) and undifferentiated uterine sarcoma (UUS) have not been distinctly determined due to the repetitive changes in the World Health Organization (WHO) classification. We aimed to compare clinicopathologic features and outcomes of patients with HGESS with those of patients with UUS.

METHODS

A multi-institutional, retrospective, cohort study was conducted including 71 patients, who underwent surgery at 13 centers from 2008 to 2017. An experienced gynecopathologist from each institution re-evaluated the slides of their own cases according to the WHO₂₀₁₄ classification. Factors associated with refractory/progressive disease, recurrence or death were examined using logistic regression analyses. Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used for survival comparisons.

RESULTS

The median disease-free survival (DFS) for HGESS and UUS was 12 months and 6 months, respectively. While the median overall survival was not reached in HGESS group, it was 22 months in the UUS group. Kaplan-Meier analyses revealed that patients with UUS had a significantly poorer DFS than those with HGESS (p = 0.016), although OS did not differ between the groups (p = 0.135). Lymphovascular-space involvement (LVSI) was the sole significant factor associated with progression, recurrence or death for HGESS (Hazard ratio: 9.353, 95% confidence interval: 2.539-34.457, p = 0.001), whereas no significant independent factor was found for UUS.

CONCLUSIONS

UUS has a more aggressive behavior than HGESS. While no significant predictor of prognosis was found for UUS, LVSI is the sole independent prognostic factor for HGESS, with patients 9.3 times more likely to experience refractory/progressive disease, recurrence or death.

Italian consensus conference on management of uterine sarcomas on behalf of S.I.G.O. (Societa' italiana di Ginecologia E Ostetricia)

BACKGROUND

Uterine sarcomas are very rare tumours with different histotypes, molecular features and clinical outcomes; therefore, it is difficult to carry out prospective clinical trials, and this often results in heterogeneous management of patients in the clinical practice.

AIM

We planned to set up an Italian consensus conference on these diseases in order to provide recommendations on treatments and quality of care in our country.

RESULTS

Early-stage uterine sarcomas are managed by hysterectomy + bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy according to menopausal status and histology; lymphadenectomy is not indicated in patients without bulky nodes, and morcellation must be avoided. The postoperative management is represented by observation, even though chemotherapy can be considered in some high-risk patients. In early-stage low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma and adenosarcomas without sarcomatous overgrowth, hormonal adjuvant treatment can be offered based on hormone receptor expression. In selected cases, external beam radiotherapy ± brachytherapy can be considered to increase local control only. Patients with advanced disease involving the abdomen can be offered primary chemotherapy (or hormonal therapy in the case of low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma and adenosarcoma without sarcomatous overgrowth), even if potentially resectable in the absence of residual disease in order to test the chemosensitivity (or hormonosensitivity); debulking surgery can be considered in patients with clinical and radiological response. Chemotherapy is based on anthracyclines ± ifosfamide or dacarbazine. Palliative radiotherapy can be offered for symptom control, and stereotactic radiotherapy can be used for up to five isolated metastatic lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of uterine sarcoma should be centralised at referral centres and managed in a multidisciplinary setting.

Endometrial stromal sarcoma: A review of rare mesenchymal uterine neoplasm

OBJECTIVE

This review aims to analyze the pathological aspects, diagnosis and treatment of rare mesenchymal uterine tumors.

METHODS

On August 2019, a systematic review of the literature was done on Pubmed, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Google Scholar search engines. The systematic review was carried out in agreement with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyzes statement (PRISMA). The following words and key phrases have been searched: "endometrial stromal sarcoma", "low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma", "high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma", "uterine sarcoma", "mesenchymal uterine tumors" and "uterine stromal sarcoma". Across these platforms and research studies, five main aspects were analyzed: the biological characteristics of the neoplasms, the number of cases, the different therapeutic approaches used, the follow-up and the oncological outcomes.

RESULTS

Of the 94 studies initially identified, 55 were chosen selecting articles focusing on endometrial stromal sarcoma. Of these fifty-five studies, 46 were retrospective in design, 7 were reviews and 2 randomized phases III trials.

CONCLUSION

Endometrial stromal sarcomas are rare mesenchymal uterine neoplasms and surgery represents the standard treatment. For uterus-limited disease, the remove en bloc with an intact resection of the tumor (without the use of morcellation) is strongly recommended. For advanced-stage disease, the standard surgical treatment is adequate cytoreduction with metastatectomy. Pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy is not recommended in patients with Low-grade Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma (ESS), while is not clear whether cytoreduction of advanced tumors improves patient survival in High-grade ESS. Administration of adjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy is not routinely used and its role is still debated.

The Many Faces of Endometriosis-Related Neoplasms in the Same Patient: A Brief Report

INTRODUCTION

Endometriosis is a common benign gynecological condition that can be associated with a slightly increased risk of developing a wide range of malignancies.

CASE PRESENTATION

We herein report a singular case of a 62-year-old woman with a history of pelvic endometriosis, referred to our institution for chronic pelvic pain and uterine bleeding, with clinical and radiological evidence of left ovarian mass of 18 cm in largest diameter and multiple nodular mural lesions of the uterine cavity. The patient underwent exploratory laparotomy followed by hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and omentectomy with pelvic lymph-node sampling. The histological examination of the ovarian mass revealed a clear-cell ovarian carcinoma arising from an endometriotic cyst. The microscopic examination of the uterine cavity showed multiple conventional leiomyomas, diffuse foci of adenomyosis, and a 1.5-cm yellow nodule diagnosed as low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma associated with glandular atypical differentiation and with extension into parametrial and omental tissues. Following the diagnosis, the patient was treated with chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and hormonal therapy and after 9 months of follow-up is alive without local recurrences and distant metastases.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS

To the best of our knowledge, the present case represents the first evidence of the simultaneous occurrence of clear-cell carcinoma and low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma arising within ovarian and uterine endometriotic foci, respectively.

Immunohistochemical and Molecular Characterization of Endometrial Stromal Sarcomas

Introduction:

Endometrial stromal sarcomas (ESSs) are rare and characterized by translocations t(7;17)(p15;q11.2) and t(10;17)(q22;p13), resulting in JAZF1-SUZ12 and YWHAE-FAM22 gene fusions used for defining low-grade (LG-ESS) and high-grade (HG-ESS) tumours.

Aim:

The objective of the study was to characterize ESSs using immunohistochemical and molecular markers.

Material and Methods:

Patients diagnosed as having ESSs between January 2014 and December 2018 were included in the study. The slides were reviewed along with a panel of immunohistochemical markers, CD10, cyclin D1, oestrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR), Ki67, and vimentin and classified according to World Health Organization (2014) criteria into LG-ESS, HG-ESS, and undifferentiated uterine sarcoma (UUS). Molecular characterization was performed by fluorescence in situ hybridization using relevant probes.

Results:

Over a 4-year period, 552 cases of endometrial malignancies were reported, 10 of which were ESS (1.8%). Of these, 5 were LG-ESS, 3 HG-ESS, and 2 UUS. CD10 was 100% sensitive and 75% specific for LG-ESS. Oestrogen receptor and PR were 100% specific but less sensitive (80%) for LG-ESS. Forty per cent (2/5) of LG-ESS demonstrated JAZF1-SUZ12 gene rearrangement. All 3 cases of HG-ESS showed diffuse strong cyclin D1 (>70% nuclei) positivity and were negative for cluster differentiation 10, ER, and PR and demonstrated YWHAE gene rearrangement. None of the UUS cases demonstrated this gene rearrangement.

Conclusion:

Endometrial stromal sarcomas are rare tumours (1.8% in this study). JAZF1-SUZ12 and YWHAE-FAM22 gene rearrangement helps in accurate characterization of ESS and can be used as diagnostic tools especially when the diagnosis is unclear or difficult. Cyclin D1 can be used as an adjuvant immunomarker for YWHAE gene–rearranged HG-ESS.

Recurrent endometrial stromal sarcoma in the abdominal wall following a total hysterectomy: A rare case report

•

High-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (HG-ESS) behaves in a more aggressive manner with a poorer overall prognosis than low-grade ESS.

•

Recurrence develops in one-half to two-third of patients with High-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma.

•

The major therapeutic procedure of patients with single site recurrent HG-ESS is primarily surgical resection.

•

Interdisciplinary and interprofessional teamwork are important in management of recurrent HG-ESS.

Introduction

High-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (HG-ESS) is a rare pathological type of uterine sarcoma. Over 80 % of affected patients would experience recurrences within a few years of initial presentation. Such case is rare and therefore, we need to report the case including the management. Information on performing good surgical techniques is important.

Case presentation

A 55-year-old female patient was referred after having a total hysterectomy and bilateral salphingoophorectomy at a private hospital. Results of pathologic examination showed that the patient had HG-ESS. The patient subsequently received adjuvant chemotherapy. The regimens used were Carboplatin (AUC-6) and Paclitaxel (175 mg/m²). Within five months following the chemotherapy, she complained rapid abdominal enlargement, which was a clinically mobile palpable solid mass at the level of the navel. Imaging findings suggested recurrent endometrial stromal sarcoma in the abdominal wall. Wide excision and frozen section, which were continued with mesh insertion and abdominal wall reconstruction, were then performed.

Discussion

Recurrence develops in one-half to two-third of patients with HG-ESS. It has been reported that the sites of recurrence usually include multiple lung metastases, peritoneal metastases, and/or local recurrences. There is currently no standard therapy for patients with recurrence of the disease as HG-ESS is a rare clinical entity. Treatment has been defined based on experiences gained from retrospective case reports.

Conclusion

Successful management of patients with recurrent abdominal wall HG-ESS requires interdisciplinary and interprofessional teamwork. Multi-centre prospective trials are required to develop a guideline of optimal treatment for the disease entity, particularly the recurrence.

Long-term impact of lymphadenectomies in patients with low-grade, early-stage uterine endometrial stroma sarcoma

AIM

The aim of our study was to investigate the lymph node metastasis (LNM) rate and effect of lymph node dissection (LND) in patients with stage I, low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LGESS).

METHODS

Patients with stage I LGESS (n = 119) that underwent surgery from July 1969 to July 2017, following up over 48 years at the China National Cancer Center were retrospectively analyzed in this study.

RESULTS

Surgical records and consulting data for patients with LGESS were analyzed to find that 47 patients received systematic pelvic LND. The number of patients with menopause in the LND(+) group were significantly lower than those in LND(-) group (2.1% vs 22.2%, P = 0.005), meanwhile, patients received bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy procedure in LND(+) group were significantly higher than LND(-) (97.9% vs 58.3%, P < 0.001). Neither progression-free survival nor overall survival was significantly improved in the LND(+) group even after propensity score matching although the progression-free survival has a stronger trend in LND(+) population.

CONCLUSION

A systematic LND was not significantly associated with prognosis for patients with early-stage LGESS. There is no sufficient indication for a systematic LND for patients with early-stage LGESS. A systematic LND might be necessary if enlarged lymph nodes were detected by image graphology or observation during surgery.

Unexpected Histopathological Diagnosis of Undifferentiated Uterine Sarcoma after Simple Hysterectomy: Extrapolating Limited Evidence

Uterine sarcomas are a rare malignancy, often retrospectively diagnosed after myomectomy or hysterectomy. Undifferentiated uterine sarcomas (UUS) are a particularly aggressive variant of this condition. Little evidence exists regarding the postoperative management of undifferentiated sarcomas diagnosed after hysterectomy performed for presumed benign conditions. We describe the case of a 33-year-old woman who presented with heavy bleeding and subsequently underwent hysterectomy on an emergency basis after failed medical management. Cut-section of the uterus revealed a grossly benign-looking sub-mucosal fibroid. However, the final histopathology report revealed undifferentiated uterine sarcoma. We worked up the patient postoperatively with MRI to rule out metastasis and performed bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy based on hormone receptivity status. We followed this with single-agent chemotherapy with adriamycin, which was followed by continuous therapy with oral letrozole (aromatase inhibitor). The patient was found doing well at the two-year follow-up, with no evidence of relapse. Postoperative diagnosis of UUS should include imaging to rule out metastasis, consideration for completion of surgery based on hormone receptivity of tumour, and lymphadenectomy based on the subtype of tumour.

Uterine Mesenchymal Tumors: Update on Classification, Staging, and Molecular Features

The spectrum of mesenchymal neoplasia in the uterus has expanded in recent years. First, the identification of prevalent, recurrent molecular alterations has led to a more biologically and clinically congruent classification of endometrial stromal tumors. Likewise, the diagnostic criteria of several rare and miscellaneous tumor types have been refined in recent case series (Perivascular Epithelioid Cell tumor, inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor). Pure mesenchymal tumors are still broadly classified based on morphology according to the tumor cell phenotype. Smooth muscle tumors predominate in frequency, followed by tumors of endometrial stromal derivation; the latter are covered in depth in this article with an emphasis on defining molecular alterations and their morphologic and clinical correlates. The remaining entities comprise a miscellaneous group in which cell derivation does not have a normal counterpart in the uterus (eg, rhabdomyosarcoma) or is obscure (eg, undifferentiated uterine sarcoma). This article discusses their clinical relevance, recent insights into their molecular biology, and the most important differential diagnoses. Regarding the latter, immunohistochemistry and (increasingly) molecular diagnostics play a role in the diagnostic workup. We conclude with a few considerations on intraoperative consultation and macroscopic examination, as well as pathologic staging and grading of uterine sarcomas as per the most recent American Joint Cancer Commission and the Fédération Internationale de Gynécologie et d'Obstétrique staging systems.

Current status of the adjuvant therapy in uterine sarcoma: A literature review

Uterine sarcomas (US) are rare mesenchymal tumours accounting approximately for 3%–7% of all uterine cancers. Histologically, US are classified into mesenchymal tumours or mixed epithelial and mesenchymal tumours. The group of mesenchymal tumours includes uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS, 65% of cases), endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS, 21%) – traditionally divided into low grade (LG-ESS) and high grade–undifferentiated uterine sarcoma (5%) and other rare subtypes such as alveolar or embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma. Despite the fact that several drugs demonstrated clinical activity in advanced or metastatic settings, the role of postoperative therapy in US remains controversial. In this review, we have summarised the current state of the art, including the chief trials on adjuvant treatment modalities in US, especially focusing on uLMS, LG-ESS and other rare histotypes.

Hormone therapy following surgery in low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: Is it related to a decrease in recurrence rate?

BACKGROUND

Low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LGESS) is, in most cases, a slow-growing malignancy; however, it is related with high recurrence rates. The aim of this study is to determine which factors may be associated with the recurrence rate of LGESS.

METHODS

The clinicopathological features and treatment options in 37 patients with LGESS were evaluated.

RESULTS

All patients underwent the hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Additionally, lymphadenectomy was performed in 56.8% (n = 21) of the patients. Among the patients who underwent lymphadenectomy, 14.3% (n = 3) had lymph node metastasis. The disease was limited to the uterus in 75.7% of patients. Treatment following surgery was radiotherapy in three patients, chemotherapy in seven patients, hormone therapy in 12 patients, and chemotherapy plus hormone therapy in one patient. Megestrol acetate was used in all patients who received hormone therapy. Median follow-up time was 96 months. The 5-year disease-free survival and disease-specific survival were 72% and 97%, respectively. The recurrence rate was 27%. Only hormone therapy following surgery was significantly associated with a lower recurrence rate, even in patients with stage 1 disease. None of the patients treated with hormone therapy following surgery had recurrence, whereas recurrence occurred in 38.5% of the patients who underwent surgery only (p = 0.039).

CONCLUSION

Hormone therapy after surgery should be considered a viable option for decreasing the LGESS recurrence rate, regardless of the disease stage.

Metastatic low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma of uterus presenting as a primary pancreatic tumor: case presentation and literature review

BACKGROUND

Metastatic tumors to the pancreas are uncommon, accounting for approximately 2% of pancreatic malignancies. The most common primary tumors to give rise to pancreatic metastases are carcinomas.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 50-year old female patient was investigated for a cause of abdominal discomfort. She had a 2-year history of menorrhagia and dysmenorrhea which was ascribed to a fibroid uterus. On imaging, she was found to have a large solid and cystic mass in the tail of the pancreas. Imaging also confirmed a fibroid uterus. A distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy showed a 9 cm circumscribed mass within, and grossly confined to, the parenchyma of the pancreatic tail. Microscopically, the pancreatic lesion was lobulated, and well-circumscribed, but focally infiltrative. It comprised sheets of uniform spindled to epithelioid cells with round to oval nuclei, coarse to vesicular chromatin, visible nucleoli, nuclear grooves and clear to eosinophilic cytoplasm. Prominent arterioles were identified. The stroma was collagenized in areas. Occasional hemosiderin-laden macrophages were seen, and focal cystic change was present. There was no evidence of nuclear pleomorphism, mitotic activity or necrosis, and there was no evidence of endometriosis despite multiple sections being taken. Immunohistochemistry showed that the tumor cells were positive for CD10, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), Wilms tumor-1 (WT-1) and smooth muscle actin (SMA). RNA sequencing detected a PHF1 rearrangement. The morphological, immunohistochemical and molecular features were of a low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS). Subsequent total hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy 3 months later, showed uterine fibroids and a 5 cm low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma confined to the uterus, with lymphatic invasion.

CONCLUSIONS

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first documented case of metastatic endometrial stromal sarcoma of uterus presenting as a primary pancreatic neoplasm. An unexpected extra-uterine location and unusual presentation of ESS may make the diagnosis challenging, despite classic histological features. Morphological, immunohistochemical and molecular findings must be combined to render the correct diagnosis.

Localized high grade endometrial stromal sarcoma and localized undifferentiated uterine sarcoma: a retrospective series of the French Sarcoma Group

OBJECTIVE

High grade endometrial stromal sarcoma and undifferentiated uterine sarcomas are associated with a very poor prognosis. Although large surgical resection is the standard of care, the optimal adjuvant strategy remains unclear.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients with localized high grade endometrial stromal sarcoma and undifferentiated uterine sarcomas (stages I-III) treated in 10 French Sarcoma Group centers was conducted.

RESULTS

39 patients with localized high grade endometrial stromal sarcoma and undifferentiated uterine sarcomas treated from 2008 to 2016 were included. 24/39 patients (61.5%) were stage I at diagnosis. 38/39 patients underwent surgical resection, with total hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy completed in 26/38 (68%). Surgeries were mostly resection complete (R0, 23/38, 60%) and microscopically incomplete resection (R1, 6/38, 16%). 22 patients (58%) underwent postoperative radiotherapy (including brachytherapy in 11 cases), and 11 (29%) underwent adjuvant chemotherapy. After a median follow-up of 33 months (range 2.6-112), 17/39 patients were alive and 21/39 (54%) had relapsed (9 local relapses and 16 metastases). The 3 year and 5 year overall survival rates were 49.8% and 31.1%, respectively, and 3 year and 5 year disease free survival rates were 42.7% and 16.0%, respectively. Median overall survival and disease free survival were 32.7 (95% CI 16.3-49.1) and 23 (4.4-41.6) months, respectively. Medians were, respectively, 46.7 months and 39.0 months among those who underwent adjuvant radiotherapy and 41.0 months and 10.3 months for those who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy. In multivariate analysis, adjuvant radiotherapy was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (P=0.012) and disease free survival (P=0.036). Chemotherapy, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics I-II stages, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-performance status 0 correlated with improved overall survival (P=0.034, P=0.002, P=0.006), and absence of vascular invasion (P=0.014) was associated with better disease free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The standard treatment of primary localized high grade endometrial stromal sarcoma and undifferentiated uterine sarcomas is total hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy. The current study shows that adjuvant radiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy appear to improve overall survival. A prospective large study is warranted to validate this therapeutic management.

Uterine Sarcomas: Experience from a Tertiary Cancer Care Center from India

Uterine sarcomas are uncommon and aggressive tumors comprising 3-7% of all uterine malignancies. The aim is to evaluate clinical presentation, histopathologic pattern, recurrence pattern, and outcome of patients with uterine sarcomas presenting to a tertiary care cancer center over an 8-year period. A total of 11 cases of uterine sarcoma were diagnosed. The median age of patients at presentation was 51 years (range 30-67 years). Six patients had leiomyosarcoma (54.5%), 4 had endometrial stromal sarcoma (36%), and 1 had adenosarcoma (9%). The main presenting symptoms were abnormal vaginal bleeding, low abdominal pain, and white discharge. Median follow-up was 11 months ranging from 3 to 200 months. Median survivals for leiomyosarcoma, endometrial stromal sarcoma, and adenosarcoma were 6.5, 18, and 56 months. The 3- and 5-year survival by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of the entire cohort was 30 and 20%. The mitotic index, age, adjuvant therapy (chemotherapy, radiotherapy), and performance of pelvic nodal dissection did not impact survival significantly in the patient with leiomyosarcoma. Stage and histology had the strongest bearing on survival and leiomyosarcoma has the worst survival, whereas adenosarcoma had the best prognosis. Adequately powered prospective studies are required to define the role of radiation therapy and chemotherapy in this rare disease.

Prognostic factors associated with uterine sarcomas: the experience of a single institution

Uterine sarcomas are infrequent and heterogeneous mesenchymal tumours, associated with aggressive characteristics and a poor clinical outcome. The aim of the study is to describe the prognostic factors associated with uterine sarcomas. The clinical records between 2000 and 2014 of women diagnosed with uterine sarcomas and initially treated surgically were reviewed. A histological comparison was performed. The overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were calculated and compared. Seventy-three women had surgery (12.3% had endometrial stromal sarcomas, 24.7% undifferentiated endometrial sarcomas, 49.3% leiomyosarcomas and 13.7% other subtypes). Complete cytoreduction had a mean DFS of 25.1 months, while the incomplete cytoreduction averaged in a DFS of 4.33 months (p = .04). The median five-year OS with a complete cytoreduction was not reached; the incomplete cytoreduction OS was 10.1 months (p = .002). Our data suggests that undifferentiated endometrial sarcomas have the lowest DFS (p = .004); while OS was negatively influence by stage IV (p < .001). Impact statement What is already known about this subject? Uterine sarcomas compared with the more common endometrial carcinomas (epithelial neoplasms), behave aggressively and are associated with a poorer prognosis. The rarity of uterine sarcoma has made it difficult to perform large studies to identify risk factors. What do the results of this study add? Complete cytoreduction improves the DFS and OS and may be a valuable prognostic factor. Poorer DFS and OS prognosis was observed in undifferentiated endometrial sarcomas. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Our results demonstrate the importance of an early diagnosis, and thus an early identification of disease that benefits from complete cytoreduction regardless of histology. For the advanced clinical stage of uterine sarcomas further research is necessary and participation in clinical trials should be encouraged.

Low-Grade Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma - a Review

Like other uterine sarcomas, low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas (LG-ESS) are a very rare tumor entity. In the past, research studies therefore discussed the various different types of the disease in combination. In addition, the classification of endometrial stromal tumors presented difficulties for quite some time so that in earlier studies it was not always possible to precisely distinguish between LG-ESS, high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma, and undifferentiated uterine sarcoma. For LG-ESS, surgery with hysterectomy and adnexectomy is the first-line treatment. The benefits of lymphadenectomy and tumor debulking are unclear. Endocrine therapy with gestagens and aromatase inhibitors is under discussion to provide adjuvant treatment for patients with advanced stages of the disease. As radiotherapy only provides locoregional control, and in view of the usually good prognosis of patients with LG-ESS, its benefits need to be weighed against its side effects. In the case of recurrence, repeat surgery is the first choice. Further research studies viewing LG-ESS as a distinct entity are needed in order to improve treatment options for patients with LG-ESS.

Extrapelvic Metastases in Endometrial Stromal Sarcomas: A Clinicopathological Review With Immunohistochemical and Molecular Characterization

Endometrial stromal sarcoma is a rare uterine tumor associated with favorable outcomes despite its ability to recur and metastasize to distant sites. Most recurrences are local, being limited to the abdomen/pelvis, but distant metastases can occur. Metastatic endometrial stromal sarcoma can occur many months to years after the original diagnosis or may present prior to the primary, potentially creating a diagnostic challenge. We report a bi-institutional review of 10 cases of endometrial stromal sarcoma with extrapelvic metastases without a prior history of endometriosis. The histologic, immunophenotypic, and molecular characteristics of these tumors are analyzed in the context of a relevant literature review.

Treatment of low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma in a nulligravid woman

A 32 year-old nulligravid woman with a uterine mass underwent exploratory laparotomy with myomectomy. Final pathology revealed a low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) with positive margins. She subsequently underwent definitive robotic hysterectomy and bilateral salpingectomy with ovarian preservation. She was diagnosed with a stage IB low-grade ESS. She is currently undergoing observation. Discussion of classification, surgical options, and adjuvant therapy is presented.

Secondary cytoreductive surgery potentially improves the oncological outcomes of patients with recurrent uterine sarcomas

Uterine sarcomas are some of the most malignant and aggressive tumor types among the gynecologic malignancies, and they are associated with a high rate of recurrence and a poor prognosis. Due to their rarity and diversity, the optimal treatment for recurrent uterine sarcomas has not yet been elucidated. The aim of the present study was to investigate the potential of secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS) for patients with recurrent uterine sarcomas. A total of 18 patients with recurrent uterine sarcomas were retrospectively identified at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nagoya University (Nagoya, Japan) between January 2002 and December 2015. This included 8 patients with leiomyosarcoma, 6 with carcinosarcoma, 3 with endometrial stromal sarcoma and 1 with adenosarcoma. All patients underwent primary debulking surgery as the initial treatment. In summary, 9 patients were treated with SCS when they experienced their first recurrence, and the other 9 patients were treated with non-SCS methods, including chemotherapy or radiotherapy. In the SCS group, 5/9 patients had confined pelvic recurrences, 3 patients had extra-pelvic diseases, including pulmonary metastasis, and one patient had intra- and extra-pelvic recurrence. The 3-year overall survival (OS) rates were 77.8 and 11.1% in the SCS and non-SCS groups, respectively. The patients who underwent SCS experienced a significantly longer OS time compared with those in the non-SCS group (P=0.006). In addition, the disease-free survival after second-line therapy was significantly longer in the SCS group than in the non-SCS group (P=0.0496). These findings suggest that resection of recurrent uterine sarcomas may be beneficial for the improvement of patient survival. Prospective studies with sufficient statistical power are warranted for further evaluation of the effect of SCS.