Improved tolerance of primary chemotherapy with reduced-dose carboplatin and paclitaxel in elderly ovarian cancer patients

Past and present: a bibliometric study on the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer

Background

Ovarian cancer (OC) is a gynecological malignancy with a high mortality rate worldwide. The unfavorable prognosis of OC is mainly attributed to the recurrent propensity. Recently, mortality from OC has exhibited a downward trend. These favorable patterns are likely to be driven by advancements in novel therapeutic regimens. However, there is a lack of visualize analysis of the application of these new drugs on women with recurrent OC (ROC). Therefore, we aimed to provide a bibliometric analysis of the evolving paradigms in the ROC treatment.

Methods

Documents on ROC treatment were systematically collected from the MEDLINE database and Web of Science Core Collection (WOSCC). The retrieved documents were exported in the plain text file format, and files were named and saved to the paths specified by the Java application. Microsoft Excel (version 2010), Citespace (6.2.R4) and VOSviewer (1.6.19) were used for data analysis, and included the following: 1) annual publication trend; 2) contributions of countries, institutions and authors; 3) co-citation of journals and references; and 4) co-occurrence of keywords.

Results

A total of 914 documents published in the MEDLINE and 9,980 ones in WOSCC were retrieved. There has been an upward trend in the productivity of publications on ROC treatment on by years. The United States was the leading contributor in this field, and the University of Texas System stood out as the most productive institution. Giovanni Scambia and Maurie Markman were the research leaders in the field of ROC treatment. The journal Gynecologic Oncology had the highest citation frequency. The reference entitled with "Niraparib Maintenance Therapy in Platinum-Sensitive, Recurrent Ovarian Cancer" got highest centrality of 0.14 in the co-citation network. Keyword analysis revealed that the focus of current ROC treatment was on platinum-based anticancer drugs, paclitaxel, angiogenesis inhibitors (AIs), immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis).

Conclusion

Scholars from a multitude of countries have been instrumental in the advancement of ROC treatment. The research hotspots and trend in the field of predominantly originated from leading international journals and specialized periodicals focused on gynecologic oncology. Maintenance therapy using AIs or (and) PARPis has emerged as a significant complement to platinum-based chemotherapy for patients with ROC.

Insights into ovarian cancer: chemo-diversity, dose depended toxicities and survival responses

Ovarian cancer has been one of the serious concerns for female health and medicinal practitioner all over the world. The wellness of over cancer patient is associated with survival responses which depends on many factors including chemotherapeutic diversity; treatment protocol; dose-dependent toxicity such as hematological toxicity and non-hematological toxicity. We found that the studied treatment regimens (TRs) (1-9) showed varying degree of hematological toxicities like moderate neutropenia (< 20%) critical neutropenia (> 20%), negligible leucopenia, critical leucopenia (> 20%), moderate thrombocytopenia (< 20%), critical thrombocytopenia (> 20%), moderate anemia (< 20%) and critical anemia (> 20%). The studied TRs showed varying degree of non-hematological toxicities like moderate nausea-vomiting (< 20%), critical nausea-vomiting (> 20%), moderate alopecia (< 20%), critical alopecia (> 20%), moderate fatigue (< 20%), critical fatigue (> 20%), moderate neurotoxicity (< 20%), critical neurotoxicity (> 20%), moderate diarrheas (< 20%). The studied TRs showed varying degree of survival responses like critical partial response (> 35%), remarkable overall responses (> 60%), critical overall responses (< 60%), remarkable stable disease (> 20%), critical stable disease (< 20%) and moderate progressive disease (< 20%). Out of the studied TRs 1-9, in case of TR 6, moderate non-hematological toxicity (NHT) and effective survival response (SR) is being diluted by critical hematological toxicity (HT). On the other hand, TR 8, 9 is showing critical HT, NHT and SR. Our analysis revealed that the toxicity of the existing therapeutic agents can be controlled through judicious decision of drug administration cycles and combination therapies.

Comparison of older and younger patients with ovarian cancer: A post hoc study (JGOG3016-A3) of the treatment strength and prognostic outcomes of conventional or dose-dense chemotherapy

AIM

To evaluate changes of treatment strength and its impact on prognosis in older patients with ovarian cancer.

METHODS

We compared relative dose intensity (RDI) as a representative of treatment strength, prognosis, and other features between older (≥65 years) and younger patients (<65 years) retrospectively. Seventy-seven older patients of 301 who received dose-dense-paclitaxel-carboplatin (dTC) and 93 older patients of 304 who received conventional-paclitaxel-carboplatin (cTC) from the Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group (JGOG) 3016 clinical trial were analyzed.

RESULTS

The RDI of older patients was lower than that of younger patients in cTC (87.4% vs. 90.8%, p = 0.009) but not in dTC (79.0% vs. 81.2%, p = 0.205). In both regimens, older patients had worse overall survival than younger patients: hazard ratio [HR] = 1.80; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.25-2.59; p = 0.001 for dTC, and HR = 1.59; 95% CI: 1.15-2.19; p = 0.04 for cTC. However, the RDI was not determined as a prognostic factor statistically. The prognostic factors identified by multivariate analysis for both regimens were clinical stage and residual disease; for dTC were age, performance status, and serum albumin; and for cTC was white blood cell count. There was no difference in neutropenia observed between age groups in either regimen.

CONCLUSIONS

The RDI of older patients varies according to the administered schedule and is not always lower than that of younger patients. Older patients with comparable treatment strength to younger patients in the dTC group did not accomplish the same level of prognosis as younger patients. Other biologic factors attributable to aging may affect prognosis.

Efficacy and Safety of First-line Single-Agent Carboplatin vs Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel for Vulnerable Older Adult Women With Ovarian Cancer: A GINECO/GCIG Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Single-agent carboplatin is often proposed instead of a conventional carboplatin-paclitaxel doublet in vulnerable older patients with ovarian cancer. Such an approach could have a detrimental effect on outcomes for these patients.

Objective

To compare the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of single-agent carboplatin every 3 weeks, weekly carboplatin-paclitaxel, or conventional every-3-weeks carboplatin-paclitaxel in vulnerable older patients with ovarian cancer.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This international, open-label, 3-arm randomized clinical trial screened 447 women 70 years and older with newly diagnosed stage III/IV ovarian cancer by determining their Geriatric Vulnerability Score; 120 patients with a Geriatric Vulnerability Score of 3 or higher were stratified by country and surgical outcome. Enrollment took place at 48 academic centers in France, Italy, Finland, Denmark, Sweden, and Canada from December 11, 2013, to April 26, 2017. Final analysis database lock April 2019. Data analysis was performed from February 1 to December 31, 2019.

Interventions

Patients were randomized to receive 6 cycles of (1) carboplatin, area under the curve (AUC) 5 mg/mL·min, plus paclitaxel, 175 mg/m2, every 3 weeks; (2) single-agent carboplatin, AUC 5 mg/mL·min or AUC 6 mg/mL·min, every 3 weeks; or (3) weekly carboplatin, AUC 2 mg/mL·min, plus paclitaxel, 60 mg/m2, on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was treatment feasibility, defined as the ability to complete 6 chemotherapy cycles without disease progression, premature toxic effects-related treatment discontinuation, or death.

Results

A total of 120 women were randomized. The mean and median age was 80 (interquartile range, 76-83; range, 70-94) years; 43 (36%) had a Geriatric Vulnerability Score of 4 and 13 (11%) had a Geriatric Vulnerability Score of 5; 40 (33%) had stage IV disease. During its third meeting, the independent data monitoring committee's recommendation led to the termination of the trial because single-agent carboplatin was associated with significantly worse survival. Six cycles were completed in 26 of 40 (65%), 19 of 40 (48%), and 24 of 40 (60%) patients in the every-3-weeks combination, single-agent carboplatin, and weekly combination groups, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events were less common with the standard every-3-weeks combination (17 of 40 [43%]) than single-agent carboplatin or weekly combination therapy (both 23 of 40 [58%]). Treatment-related deaths occurred in 4 patients (2 of 40 [5%] in each combination group).

Conclusions and Relevance

This randomized clinical trial shows that compared with every-3-weeks or weekly carboplatin-paclitaxel regimens, single-agent carboplatin was less active with significantly worse survival outcomes in vulnerable older patients with ovarian cancer.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02001272.

Tolerability and Efficacy of Bevacizumab Monotherapy in Older Patients With Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

BACKGROUND/AIM

The aim of this study was to compare the tolerability and efficacy of bevacizumab monotherapy between older and younger patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We enrolled 32 patients with recurrent ovarian cancer who were treated with bevacizumab monotherapy and divided them into those who were 65 years and older (n=12) and those younger than 65 years (n=20).

RESULTS

Except for grade ≥3 proteinuria, incidences of adverse events did not differ significantly between the groups. Although older patients exhibited more frequently cycle delay caused by non-hematological toxicities, this difference was not significant. There was no significant difference in tumor response and survival between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Bevacizumab monotherapy was tolerable and effective for older patients with recurrent ovarian cancer compared with younger patients.

Comprehensive geriatric assessment is an independent prognostic factor in older patients with metastatic renal cell cancer treated with first-line Sunitinib or Pazopanib: a single center experience

BACKGROUND

There is poor data on the prognostic role of Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) in older patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with first line Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical charts of mRCC patients older than 70 years treated at our Institute with first-line Sunitinib or Pazopanib for at least 6 months. Every patient received a CGA at baseline and was identified as fit, vulnerable or frail according to Balducci's Criteria. We then assessed the impact of CGA category on survival, disease control and tolerability of TKIs.

RESULTS

We identified 86 eligible patients. Median age: 74.5 years, 56% males; 45.4% were fit, 37.2% vulnerable and 17.4% frail at CGA. There were no significant differences in the rate of Grade (G)1-2 and G3-4 toxicities, dose reduction rates, PFS and OS between Sunitinib and Pazopanib. Fit, vulnerable and frail patients achieved significantly different median PFS (18.9 vs 11.2 vs 5.1 months; p < 0.001) and OS (35.5 vs 14.6 vs 10.9 months; p < 0.001). Patients categorized as fit had higher chance of receiving a second-line treatment (66.6% vs 28.9% in vulnerable/frail; p = 0.002). The incidence of G3/4 events was significantly lower in the fit subgroup (19% vs 45% in vulnerable/frail; p = 0.0025).

CONCLUSIONS

In our retrospective single-center experience, CGA could accurately discriminate patients with higher risk of experiencing G3/4 toxicities, shorter PFS, and lower chance of receiving a second line treatment. CGA strongly impacted on OS, independently from International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC) classification.

Is standard radical surgery necessary for elderly patients with early-stage epithelial ovarian carcinoma? ~Propensity score matched analysis~

OBJECTIVE

The impact of 'standard full-staged radical surgery (SRS)' on overall survival (OS) in elderly patients with early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) remains unclear. In the current study, we investigated the impact of SRS on OS in elderly patients with early-stage EOC in a multicentric analysis using a propensity score (PS)-matching technique.

METHODS

Between 1986 and 2017, 3227 patients with EOC were registered and accumulated by the Tokai Ovarian Tumor Study Group, consisting of 14 collaborating institutions, after a central pathological review. Among them, 204 elderly patients aged older than or equal to 65 years who had a stage I EOC were analyzed, including 72 patients who had received SRS (Group I) and 132 who had undergone non-SRS limited surgery (Group II). Oncologic outcomes were compared between the two groups using a PS-matching technique to adjust for various clinicopathologic risk factors.

RESULTS

The median follow-up duration of all surviving patients was 55.9 months. Consequently, 54 patients (26.5%) developed recurrence. In addition, 33 patients (16.2%) died of the disease. In the original cohort, the 5-year OS rates of Groups I and II were 95.8 and 82.3%, respectively. We identified a marginally significant difference between the two groups (Log-rank: P = 0.086). In the PS-matched cohort after adjustment for multiple clinicopathologic factors, there was no significant difference in OS between the two groups [OS (Group I vs. II), HR: 0.766 (95% CI: 0.271-2.165), P = 0.615].

CONCLUSIONS

After adjustment for clinicopathologic factors, non-SRS limited surgery may not worsen the oncologic outcome in elderly women with early-stage EOC. A large-scale clinical study is necessary to validate the findings.

Early treatment modifications improve chemotherapy adherence in ovarian cancer patients ≥70 years

OBJECTIVE

Elderly ovarian cancer patients are underrepresented in clinical trials and disadvantaged with regard to therapeutic standards compared to other age groups. We explored the specific performance of a subset of patients aged ≥70 years in a large meta-data set of 3 phase III trials.

METHODS

3333 patients with advanced ovarian cancer recruited into 3 clinical phase III trials of the AGO & GINECO study groups were retrospectively analysed for age-specific prognostic and toxicity parameters.

RESULTS

Only 10% (359/3333) of the patients were aged ≥70 years. This subgroup presented with impaired performance statuses (ECOG 2 14.8 vs 10.1%) and higher FIGO-stages (FIGO IIIC-IV 78.5 vs 73.6%) compared to younger patients. Complete operative tumor resection was achieved less frequently (postoperative tumor burden >10 mm 46.7 vs 33.9%) and elderly received less cycles of platinum/taxane-based chemotherapies (>4 cycles 81.9 vs 90.7%). FIGO-stage, histology, postoperative tumor burden and number of chemotherapy cycles were independent prognostic factors in elderly patients. Elderly patients with ≤4 cycles of chemotherapy showed a median OS of 18.4 months compared to 30.9 months in elderly with 5-6 cycles (p < 0.001). This effect was accentuated in elderly patients after complete tumor resection (cumulative survival benefit of 33.8 months). Analyses of chemotherapeutic delivery revealed that elderly patients with at least one cycle delay had higher chances to complete >4 cycles of chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Protocol defined treatment modifications might support completion of >4 cycles of standard chemotherapy in fit elderly OC patients.

[Epithelial ovarian cancer and elderly patients. Article drafted from the French Guidelines in oncology entitled "Initial management of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer" developed by FRANCOGYN, CNGOF, SFOG, GINECO-ARCAGY under the aegis of CNGOF and endorsed by INCa]

In ovarian, tubal and primary peritoneal cancers, older adults have an over-mortality due to more aggressive disease (NP4), surgical and chemotherapy under treatment (NP4) and co-morbidities (NP4). Older age is at higher risk for postoperative morbidity and mortality (NP4). Surgery is more often incomplete in this elderly population (NP4). Older age is a risk factor for lower dose intensity in adjuvant chemotherapy (NP4) and incomplete chemotherapy (NP4). Nevertheless, the benefit of a complete surgery remains identical to that of the younger population (NP2). Preoperative functional assessment identifies patients at risk for postoperative complications (NP4). The perioperative risk depends on three variables, the ASA score, the age and the complexity score of the surgery (NP4). It is recommended to perform cytoreduction surgery in an expert centre (grade C) and on the basis of geriatric expertise analysing functional and physical performance (grade C). The benefit/risk balance of surgery should be assessed on a case-by-case basis for the most at-risk (NP4) populations defined by: (i) age≥80 years, especially if albuminemia≤37g/L; (ii) age≥75 years and FIGO stage IV; (iii) age≥75 years, stage FIGO III and≥1 comorbidity. A comprehensive geriatric assessment is recommended prior to the management of an elderly person with primary ovarian, tubal or peritoneal cancer (grade C). The GVS (Geriatric Vulnerability Score) is used to identify vulnerable elderly patients (NP2). In fit elderly patients, it is recommended to perform intravenous chemotherapy identical to that of younger patients (ie platinum-based dual therapy) (grade B). In vulnerable elderly patients, various adapted chemotherapy regimens have been prospectively evaluated in non-comparative trials, and seem feasible considering specific and nonspecific toxicities: carboplatin monotherapy (NP2), carboplatin AUC2+paclitaxel 60mg/m² 3 weeks/4 (NP2), carboplatin AUC 4-5+paclitaxel 135mg/m²/3 weeks (NP2), carboplatin AUC5/3 weeks+paclitaxel 60mg/m²/week (NP3). In the absence of comparative data, no recommendation can be made in this population. Primary chemotherapy decreases the complexity of the surgical procedure and perioperative morbidity and mortality during interval surgery (NP1). It should be considered after 70 years in cases of comorbidities and/or peritoneal carcinomatosis sufficient for complex initial surgery (NP4).

Ovarian Cancer Management in the Oldest Old: Improving Outcomes and Tailoring Treatments

Ovarian cancer is the most common cause of death from gynecological cancers in developed countries. It is a common disease of older women at or above 63 years upon diagnosis. Thanks to advance in new treatments, mortality from ovarian cancer has declined in developed countries in the last decade. This decline in mortality rate is unevenly distributed across the age-spectrum. While mortality in younger women has decreased 21.7%, for elderly women it has declined only 2.2%. Even if ovarian cancer is clearly a disease of the elderly, older women are underrepresented in clinical trials, and scant evidence exists for the treatment of women older than 80 years. Moreover, older women are frequently undertreated, receive less chemotherapy and less combination of surgery and chemotherapy, despite the fact that this is considered the optimal treatment modality. This may be mainly due to the lack of evidence and physician’s confidence in the management of elderly women with ovarian cancer. In this review, we focus on the management of older women with ovarian cancer, considering geriatric features tied to this population.

Feasibility and response to nedaplatin monotherapy in older patients with ovarian cancer

PURPOSE

Nedaplatin (NDP), a second-generation platinum analog, has been developed to reduce the toxicity of cisplatin. Although the use of NDP for older patients seems suitable because of the reduced risk of toxicity, few studies have investigated its application to older patients with ovarian cancer (OC). The objective of this study was to compare the tolerability and effectiveness of NDP between patients older and younger than 70 years of age with OC.

METHODS

We enrolled 56 patients with OC who were treated with NDP monotherapy and divided them into those who were 70 years and older (n = 18) and younger than 70 years (n = 38). NDP was administered intravenously until disease progression or unacceptable toxicities occurred.

RESULTS

The incidences of grade 3/4 hematological toxicities were significantly higher in the older patients than in the younger patients, including anemia (p = 0.0021), leucopenia (p = 0.029), neutropenia (p = 0.0048), and thrombocytopenia (p = 0.0024). The incidence of elevated creatinine was also significantly higher in the older patients (p = 0.0063). Older patients had significantly more frequent dose reductions (p = 0.017) and treatment interruptions from toxicity (p = 0.04). The tumor response rate for NDP did not differ significantly between younger (29%) and older (28%) patients (p = 0.47). The two age groups also did not significantly differ in progression-free survival (p = 0.27) and overall survival (p = 0.46).

CONCLUSIONS

Although NDP is a useful therapeutic option for OC, careful consideration of the adverse effect should be given for patients 70 years and older.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemotherapy cycle number: A national multicentre study

OBJECTIVES

Six cycles of consolidation chemotherapy have become the standard for ovarian cancer treatment regimen following primary cytoreduction, yet with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), only 3 consolidation cycles are used. This study examines the effects of number of chemotherapy cycles in women with ovarian cancer that are being treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In addition, we examined the effect of number of cycles on survival on consolidation and total chemotherapy.

METHODS

All patients with stage IIIC and IV high grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) were identified at 4 major Canadian cancer centers treated with NAC. A retrospective chart review was conducted using the medical charts and registry databases.

RESULTS

403 NAC patients were identified. 47% had zero residual disease. Chemotherapy cycles were divided into <3cycles or ≥4cycles for NAC and consolidation treatments and analyzed with multivariate analysis. 139/403 (34.5%) received ≥4cycles of NAC and had a worse prognosis than <3cycles (p=0.011). 70/403 (17.4%) received ≥4cycles of consolidation treatment and there was no difference in survival (p=0.33) CONCLUSION: Women with advanced HGSC are managed with a combination of surgery and chemotherapy. This is a study of a homogenous cohort of patients with stage IIIC or IV high grade serous cancers who received NAC. ≥4cycles of NAC had a worse outcome than <3cycles likely due to poor prognostic factors or poor response. The number of consolidation cycles did not appear to make a difference in overall survival.

Improving outcomes for older women with gynaecological malignancies

The incidence of most gynaecological malignancies rises significantly with increasing age. With an ageing population, the proportion of women over the age of 65 with cancer is expected to rise substantially over the next decade. Unfortunately, survival outcomes are much poorer in older patients and evidence suggests that older women with gynaecological cancers are less likely to receive current standard of care treatment options. Despite this, older women are under-represented in practice changing clinical studies. The evidence for efficacy and tolerability is therefore extrapolated from a younger; often more fit population and applied to in every day clinical practice to older patients with co-morbidities. There has been significant progress in the development of geriatric assessment in oncology to predict treatment outcomes and tolerability however there is still no clear evidence that undertaking a geriatric assessment improves patient outcomes. Clinical trials focusing on treating older patients are urgently required. In this review, we discuss the evidence for treatment of gynaecological cancers as well as methods of assessing older patients for therapy. Potential biomarkers of ageing are also summarised.

Ovarian cancer in the older woman

Ovarian cancer is the seventh most common cancer in women worldwide and accounts for nearly 4% of all new cases of cancer in women. Almost half of all patients with ovarian cancer are over the age of 65 at diagnosis, and over 70% of deaths from ovarian cancer occur in this same age group. As the population ages, the number of older women with ovarian cancer is increasing. Compared to younger women, older women with ovarian cancer receive less surgery and chemotherapy, develop worse toxicity, and have poorer outcomes. They are also significantly under-represented in clinical trials and thus application of standard treatment regimens can be challenging. Performance status alone has been shown to be an inadequate tool to predict toxicity of older patients from chemotherapy. Use of formal geriatric assessment tools is a promising direction for stratifying older patients on trials. Elderly-specific trials, adjustments to the eligibility criteria, modified treatment regimens, and interventions to decrease morbidities in the vulnerable older population should be encouraged.

The Application and Outcome of Standard of Care Treatment in Elderly Women with Ovarian Cancer: A Literature Review over the Last 10 Years

The rising number and increasing longevity of the elderly population calls for improvements and potentially a more personalized approach to the treatment of cancer in this group. Elderly patients frequently present with a number of comorbidities, complicating surgery and chemotherapy tolerability. In the case of ovarian cancer, elderly women present with more advanced disease, making the issue of providing adequate treatment without significant morbidity critical. Most studies support the application of standard of care treatment to elderly women with ovarian cancer, yet it seems to be offered less frequently in the elderly. The objective of this review is to examine the application and outcome of standard of care treatment in elderly women with ovarian cancer. The aim is to ultimately improve the approach to treatment in this group.

Combination chemotherapy with docetaxel and carboplatin for elderly patients with endometrial cancer

Approximately half of all endometrial cancer cases are diagnosed in patients aged >65 years. The objective of this study was to compare the tolerability and effectiveness of combination chemotherapy with docetaxel and carboplatin between endometrial cancer patients older and younger than 65 years of age. Chemotherapy-naive patients with endometrial cancer were enrolled in this retrospective study between April, 2008 and March, 2015. The patients received docetaxel (60 mg/m²) and carboplatin (area under the curve of 6 mg/ml/min) on day 1 of a 3-week cycle. The tolerability and effectiveness of this regimen were analyzed. A total of 41 patients with endometrial cancer were enrolled in this study, of whom 26 (63%) were aged <65 years and 15 (37%) were aged ≥65 years. There were no significant differences with regard to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score and disease stage between the two groups. Patients aged >65 years were significantly more likely to have serous or clear-cell histology and high-grade tumors compared with the younger group (P=0.014 and 0.012, respectively). Although the number of chemotherapy cycles, cycle delays and treatment interruptions were comparable between older and younger patients, there was a trend toward more dose reductions in the older group (P=0.12). The incidence of hematological toxicities did not differ significantly between the two groups. The incidence of grade 3/4 diarrhea was significantly higher in the older group (P=0.014) and hypersensitivity was significantly more frequent in the younger group (P=0.035). Patients aged ≥65 years had equivalent response rates, progression-free survival and overall survival compared with those aged <65 years. These results suggest that combination chemotherapy with docetaxel and carboplatin was tolerable and effective for the treatment of elderly chemotherapy-naive patients with endometrial cancer.

Breast and ovarian cancer in the older woman

Nearly half of all women diagnosed with breast or ovarian cancer are age 65 years or older with the number of women diagnosed expected to increase as the population ages and life expectancy improves. Older women are less likely to be offered standard cancer treatments, are more likely to develop higher toxicity, and have higher mortality. Chronologic age should not be the only factor used for making treatment decisions. Functional dependence, organ function, comorbidity, polypharmacy, social support, cognitive and/or psychosocial factors, overall life expectancy, and patient's goals of care are equally vital and should be assessed before and during treatment. In this review, current evidence and treatment guidelines for older women with breast or ovarian cancer are outlined.

Potential drug interactions and chemotoxicity in older patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy

PURPOSE

Increased risk of drug interactions due to polypharmacy and aging-related changes in physiology among older patients with cancer is further augmented during chemotherapy. No previous studies examined potential drug interactions (PDIs) from polypharmacy and their association with chemotherapy tolerance in older patients with cancer.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective medical chart review of 244 patients aged 70+ years who received chemotherapy for solid or hematological malignancies. PDI among all drugs, supplements, and herbals taken with the first chemotherapy cycle were screened for using the Drug Interaction Facts software, which classifies PDIs into five levels of clinical significance with level 1 being the highest. Descriptive and correlative statistics were used to describe rates of PDI. The association between PDI and severe chemotoxicity was tested with logistic regressions adjusted for baseline covariates.

RESULTS

A total of 769 PDIs were identified in 75.4% patients. Of the 82 level 1 PDIs identified among these, 32 PDIs involved chemotherapeutics. A large proportion of the identified PDIs were of minor clinical significance. The risk of severe non-hematological toxicity almost doubled with each level 1 PDI (OR=1.94, 95% CI: 1.22-3.09), and tripled with each level 1 PDI involving chemotherapeutics (OR=3.08, 95% CI: 1.33-7.12). No association between PDI and hematological toxicity was found.

CONCLUSIONS

In this convenience sample of older patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy we found notable rates of PDI and a substantial adjusted impact of PDI on risk of non-hematological toxicity. These findings warrant further research to optimize chemotherapy outcomes.

Considerations regarding the administration of systemic therapy for elderly patients with ovarian cancer

To improve the benefit and tolerability of cancer treatment, we must develop new geriatric-specific trials, better assessment tools, and encourage enrollment of older patients in clinical trials. Age is a strong predictor of survival in ovarian cancer and often influences the treatment plan. Elderly patients, broadly defined as older than age 65 years, are commonly not offered participation in clinical research or provided with substandard chemotherapy or surgical options. Because first-line, platinum-based chemotherapy with cytoreductive surgery is a potentially curative modality, all standard treatment options should be explored (intravenous, neoadjuvant, and/or intraperitoneal chemotherapy). However, one must balance the specific needs of the older patient and be aware of the increased risk of side effects. To be mindful and respectful, the oncologist should clearly define the goals (palliative vs. curative) and specific risks of treatment to patients and their families. As the field of geriatric oncology evolves and prospective trials tailored to older women with ovarian cancer are developed, specific guidelines will ultimately assist in these difficult decisions.

Doublet chemotherapy in the elderly patient with ovarian cancer

The aging of the population has focused on the need to evaluate older patients with cancer. Approximately 50% of patients with ovarian cancer will be older than age 65 years. Increasing age has been associated with decreased survival. It is uncertain whether this relates to biologic factors, treatment factors, or both. There is concern that undertreatment may be associated with decreased survival. Older patients with ovarian cancer have been underrepresented in clinical trials. Therefore, the evidence base on which make decisions is lacking. Clinicians need to be aware of the currently available data to aid in treatment decisions. Doublet therapy is the most common standard treatment in epithelial ovarian cancer. It usually consists of a taxane and a platinum compound. A series of cooperative group studies in both the United States and Europe established intravenous paclitaxel and carboplatin as the most common standard in optimally debulked patients. The recent introduction of intraperitoneal therapy has complicated decision making in terms of which older patients would benefit from this more toxic therapy. In relapsed patients, the issue of platinum sensitivity is critical in deciding whether to reutilize platinum compounds. It is unclear whether single agents or combinations are superior, particularly in older patients. Geriatric assessment is an important component of decision making. Prospective studies are needed to develop strategies to determine the optimal treatment for older patients with ovarian cancer.

Evaluation of prevalent and incident ovarian cancer co-morbidity

BACKGROUND

The peak in incidence of ovarian cancer occurs around 65 years and concurrent increasing risk by age for a number of diseases strongly influence treatment and prognosis. The aim was to explore prevalence and incidence of co-morbidity in ovarian cancer patients compared with the general population.

METHODS

The study population was patients with ovarian cancer in Sweden 1993-2006 (n=11 139) and five controls per case (n=55 687). Co-morbidity from 1987 to 2006 was obtained from the Swedish Patient Register. Prevalent data were analysed with logistic regression and incident data with Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Women developing ovarian cancer did not have higher overall morbidity than other women earlier than 3 months preceding cancer diagnosis. However, at time of diagnosis 11 of 13 prevalent diagnosis groups were more common among ovarian cancer patients compared with controls. The incidence of many common diagnoses was increased several years following the ovarian cancer and the most common diagnoses during the follow-up period were thromboembolism, haematologic and gastrointestinal complications.

CONCLUSION

Women developing ovarian cancer do not have higher overall morbidity the years preceding cancer diagnosis. The incidence of many common diagnoses was increased several years following the ovarian cancer. It is crucial to consider time between co-morbidity and cancer diagnosis to understand and interpret associations.

Management of the Elderly Patient With Gynecologic Cancer: Report of the 2011 Workshop in Geriatric Gynecologic Oncology

Abstract

Reflecting the worldwide aging trend and close association of aging with cancer, geriatric oncology is now growing beyond its pioneer years. Nevertheless, geriatric oncology in the gynecologic field is in the beginning stage; indeed, there is no geriatric specialist who is trained in this particular field of gynecologic oncology. Therefore, we held the first workshop in geriatric gynecologic oncology. In this review, we summarize what we discussed at the workshop and provide evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of gynecologic cancer in elderly individuals.

Systemic therapies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in older adults

The introduction of targeted therapies has radically changed the treatment paradigm for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). However, multiple clinical dilemmas have emerged. For instance, limited data are available to juxtapose the safety and efficacy profile of targeted therapies between older and younger adults. Herein, pivotal trials of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)- and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)-directed therapies are assessed in the context of their implications in treating older adults with mRCC. In general, subset analyses from these pivotal studies suggest similar efficacy of targeted therapies amongst older adults. Aging is accompanied by a multitude of physiological changes, as well as an increased prevalence of co-morbidities. The age-related toxicity profiles of targeted agents for mRCC are detailed to provide a framework for the risks and benefits of these therapies in older adults. Ultimately, tools such as the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) that account for physiological (as opposed to chronological) age may prove useful in the evaluation and treatment of older adults with mRCC.

Risk of hospitalizations associated with adverse effects of chemotherapy in a large community-based cohort of elderly women with ovarian cancer

PURPOSE

To determine the rates of hospitalization after receiving chemotherapy in patients who were diagnosed with ovarian cancer and to examine significant predictors for hospitalizations.

METHODS

We studied 9361 women who were diagnosed with stages I to IV ovarian cancer at age 65 or older in 1991 to 2002, identified from the 16 areas of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program linked with Medicare data. Hospitalization for adverse effects associated with chemotherapy was defined using primary and secondary diagnosis codes from the inpatient claims. Multivariate logistic regression was used to estimate the risk of being hospitalized for adverse effects in patients receiving chemotherapy compared with those who did not.

RESULTS

A total of 1363 patients (14.6% of 9361) received platinum-based chemotherapy without taxane, 3094 patients (33.1%) received platinum-taxane combination chemotherapy, 1694 patients (18.1%) administered other (nonplatinum) chemotherapy, and 3210 patients (34.3%) did not receive chemotherapy. Compared with those receiving platinum-based chemotherapy, patients receiving nonplatinum chemotherapy had a higher risk of being hospitalized for infection (odds ratio [OR], 1.66; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.19-2.31), whereas patients who did not receive chemotherapy (OR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.10-0.28) or received platinum-taxane combination chemotherapy (OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.34-0.86) were significantly less likely to be hospitalized for hematologic toxicities. Although both comorbidity scores and age were significant predictors for hospitalization for infection and cardiovascular diseases, older age was not a significant predictor for gastrointestinal and hematologic toxicities.

CONCLUSIONS

The nonplatinum chemotherapeutic regimens were associated with higher rates of hospitalizations for gastrointestinal and hematologic conditions or infections compared with platinum-based or platinum-taxane combination regimens. Comorbidity was a significant predictor for hospitalization for infections and gastrointestinal and cardiovascular diseases.