The combination of monthly carboplatin and weekly paclitaxel is highly active for the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer

Investigating the mechanisms of drug resistance and prognosis in ovarian cancer using single-cell RNA sequencing and bulk RNA sequencing

Ovarian cancer stands as a prevalent malignancy within the realm of gynecology, and the emergence of resistance to chemotherapeutic agents remains a pivotal impediment to both prognosis and treatment. Through a single-cell level investigation, we scrutinize the drug resistance and mitotic activity of the core tumor cells in ovarian cancer. Our study revisits the interrelationships and temporal trajectories of distinct epithelial cells (EPCs) subpopulations, while identifying genes associated with ovarian cancer prognosis. Notably, our findings establish a strong association between the drug resistance of EPCs and oxidative phosphorylation pathways. Subsequently, through subpopulation and temporal trajectory analysis, we confirm the intermediate position of EPCs subpopulation C0. Furthermore, we delve into the immunological functions and differentially expressed genes associated with the prognosis of C0, shedding light on the potential for constructing novel ovarian cancer prognosis models and identifying new therapeutic targets.

Localized chemotherapy approaches and advanced drug delivery strategies: a step forward in the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis from ovarian cancer

Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is a common outcome of epithelial ovarian carcinoma and is the leading cause of death for these patients. Tumor location, extent, peculiarities of the microenvironment, and the development of drug resistance are the main challenges that need to be addressed to improve therapeutic outcome. The development of new procedures such as HIPEC (Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy) and PIPAC (Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy) have enabled locoregional delivery of chemotherapeutics, while the increasingly efficient design and development of advanced drug delivery micro and nanosystems are helping to promote tumor targeting and penetration and to reduce the side effects associated with systemic chemotherapy administration. The possibility of combining drug-loaded carriers with delivery via HIPEC and PIPAC represents a powerful tool to improve treatment efficacy, and this possibility has recently begun to be explored. This review will discuss the latest advances in the treatment of PC derived from ovarian cancer, with a focus on the potential of PIPAC and nanoparticles in terms of their application to develop new therapeutic strategies and future prospects.

Health Care Resource Utilization and Costs Associated with Disease Progression in Ovarian Cancer

Introduction

Ovarian cancer (OC) is one of the leading causes of cancer mortality among women in the United States. With the approval of first-line maintenance therapies, patients with OC experienced prolonged first-line progression-free survival. While the literature addresses some costs associated with OC, further research is needed on the costs of progression that are potentially deferred or prevented by early maintenance. The objective of this study was to capture the health care resource utilization and costs of patients with advanced OC who never received poly(ADP ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor maintenance.

Methods

We conducted a descriptive retrospective analysis of treatment patterns and the consequences of progression through several lines of therapy (LOTs) in patients with OC, using claims from commercial and Medicare Advantage health plan members in the United States from the Optum Research Database between January 1, 2010, and April 30, 2019. Patients were required to have an index OC diagnosis (≥ 2 non-diagnostic claims). We examined up to 4 LOTs and the time between treatments.

Results

A total of 5498 women met the eligibility criteria. As the number of LOTs increased, the median duration of each line decreased from 137 days in LOT1 to 94 days in LOT4, and the time between lines also decreased from 245 to 0 days. Ambulatory care visits were a major driver of health care resource utilization, with a median of about 6 monthly visits during active treatment. The mean total monthly health care costs for patients with at least 2 LOTs were US$8588 (SD: $8533) before LOT2 and increased to $15,358 (SD: $21,460) during or after LOT2.

Conclusions

Prolonging progression-free survival after first-line treatment in patients with OC may provide the opportunity to delay or prevent later treatment, the financial toxicity felt by patients, and the economic burden to the health care system associated with progression.

Ovarian cancer is a complex disease in which > 70% of patients are diagnosed with advanced disease, and one of the leading causes of cancer mortality among women in the United States. A variety of maintenance therapy options, including bevacizumab, PARP inhibitors, and PARP plus bevacizumab combination therapies, have demonstrated improvements in progression-free survival. By delaying disease progression after completion of first-line therapy, a simultaneous decrease in post-progression health care costs may be seen. The objective of this study was to capture the health care resource utilization and costs of patients with advanced ovarian cancer who did not receive a PARP inhibitor at any time in their treatment

In patients never receiving a PARP inhibitor, this study documented substantial health care resource usage and costs associated with progression beyond the first line of treatment (surgery and/or chemotherapy) in ovarian cancer. These were largely driven by the number of ambulatory care visits. When these visits are combined with emergency department visits and inpatient stays, high costs are incurred by both patients and third-party payers

Prolonging progression-free survival after first-line treatment in patients with ovarian cancer may delay or prevent the need for later treatment, the financial burden felt by patients, and the economic burden to the health care system associated with subsequent disease progressions

Epithelial Ovarian Cancer and Cancer Stem Cells

Epithelial ovarian cancer is a lethal gynecological cancer. It is related to high mortality because the majority of the patients present in advanced stage and because of the high recurrence rates of the disease. Recurrent ovarian cancer is classified according to the time interval between the last platinum-based chemotherapy and the occurrence of recurrence, to platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant. Many theories tried to explain development of resistance to platinum-based therapy. "Cancer stem cells" is one of these theories and is being currently under investigation by many groups. This chapter will demonstrate the suggested contribution of cancer stem cells to the development of recurrent ovarian cancer.

Overview of imaging findings associated with systemic therapies in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

PURPOSE

To provide an overview for radiologists of the systemic agents used in the treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) and their associated toxicities.

RESULTS

EOC is a common gynecological malignancy, with the majority of patients presenting with advanced stage disease at the time of diagnosis. Although primary cytoreductive surgery and chemotherapy are the principal treatments for EOC, recurrence rates of disease remain high. As several molecular targeted therapies have been developed in the last decade, various novel agents have shown efficacy in the treatment of advanced EOC. Advanced EOC will be discussed by outlining the relevant radiological features of toxicities.

CONCLUSION

Knowledge of the systemic therapies utilized in the treatment of advanced EOC and their associated radiological features is critical in diagnostic image interpretation.

Dose-dense chemotherapy with weekly paclitaxel and 3-weekly carboplatin for recurrent ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the response to dose-dense chemotherapy of weekly paclitaxel and 3-weekly carboplatin in recurrent ovarian cancer, and to report results of literature review.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients accepted weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m² on day 1, 8, 15 and carboplatin on day1 at area under curve (AUC) 6 every 21 days were reviewed for the response rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, and toxicity during January 2012 to April 2016 in Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taiwan.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients with recurrent ovarian cancer, including 1 platinum-resistant, 7 partially platinum-sensitive, and 8 platinum-sensitive, accepted a median of 6 cycles of chemotherapy (range 3-10). The overall response rate (ORR) and complete response (CR) rate were 93.8%, and 62.5%, respectively. The median PFS of all patients were 10.9 months (range 4.3-40.5). The median time to response (TTR) was 29.0 days (range 19.6-38.4). The median disease-free survival (DFS) after CR was 5.6 months (range 1.2-34.2). Grade 3 at least toxicity included anemia (6.3%), neutropenia (50%), and thrombocytopenia (18.8%). Twenty-nine articles on phase I, II, III, or retrospective studies of dose-dense chemotherapy with weekly paclitaxel were reviewed.

CONCLUSION

This is the first report using Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group 3016 protocol, weekly paclitaxel and 3-weely carboplatin, on recurrent ovarian cancer. The current study showed high ORR and CR with tolerable toxicities. Our study suggested dose-dense chemotherapy with paclitaxel, especially combining carboplatin created high efficacy probably by anti-angiogenesis. However, consolidation or maintenance therapy is needed to prolong DFS.

Does Carboplatin Rapid Desensitization Change Its Adverse Drug Reactions Other than Hypersensitivity and Efficacy in Patients With Ovarian Cancer?

Purpose

Rapid drug desensitization is known to be a good strategy in patients with drug hypersensitivity to chemotherapy. However, changes in maximal drug concentration and exposure time in blood through desensitization may alter other adverse reactions and efficacy of the drug. We investigated rapid desensitization for carboplatin in terms of severe adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and efficacy compared with the standard infusion.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients with recurrent ovarian cancer who received carboplatin chemotherapy from 2017 to 2019. We compared serious adverse events (SAEs), ADRs according to organ classes, time to progression (TTP), and overall survival (OS).

Results

Of 108 desensitization procedures performed in 21 patients, 104 were successfully accomplished (96.3%). There were compared with 271 procedures in 41 patients who received the standard infusion method. There were 8 (7.7%) SAEs in the rapid desensitization group and 34 (12.5%) in the control group. One drug-related death occurred in the rapid desensitization group. In the rapid desensitized group, except for neutropenia, there was no statistically significant increase in SAEs and over grade 3 of ADRs according to organ classes compared with the control group. In the efficacy analysis, TTP and OS were similar in the 2 groups.

Conclusions

Rapid desensitization of carboplatin can lower the risk of immediate hypersensitivity reactions without changing the inherent effect and severe ADRs.

Phase I study of continuous olaparib capsule dosing in combination with carboplatin and/or paclitaxel (Part 1)

Background The PARP inhibitor olaparib has shown acceptable toxicity at doses of up to 400 mg twice daily (bid; capsule formulation) with encouraging signs of antitumor activity. Based on its mode of action, olaparib may sensitize tumor cells to DNA-damaging agents. This Phase I trial (NCT00516724) evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and preliminary efficacy of olaparib combined with carboplatin and/or paclitaxel. Methods Patients with advanced solid tumors received olaparib (capsule bid) plus carboplatin (Part A), carboplatin and paclitaxel (Part B), or paclitaxel (Part C). In each part of the study, different drug doses were given to define the most appropriate dose/drug combination to use in further studies. Safety assessments included evaluation of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs; cycle 1 only), adverse events (AEs) and physical examinations. PK assessments of olaparib, carboplatin and paclitaxel were performed. Tumor responses (RECIST) were assessed every two cycles. Results Fifty-seven patients received treatment. DLTs were reported in two patients (both receiving olaparib 100 mg bid and carboplatin AUC 4; Part A, cohort 2): grade 1 thrombocytopenia with grade 2 neutropenia lasting for 16 days, and grade 2 neutropenia lasting for 7 days. Non-hematologic AEs were predominantly grade 1-2 and included fatigue (70%) and nausea (40%). Bone marrow suppression, mainly neutropenia (51%) and thrombocytopenia (25%), frequently led to dose modifications. Conclusions Olaparib in combination with carboplatin and/or paclitaxel resulted in increased hematologic toxicities, making it challenging to establish a dosing regimen that could be tolerated for multiple cycles without dose modifications.

Incidence of Hypersensitivity Reactions to Carboplatin or Paclitaxel in Patients With Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneal Cancer With or Without BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutations

The association of BRCA mutation status with hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) to carboplatin has gained interest in recent years, particularly in patients with ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer. The primary objective of this study is to determine whether the presence of BRCA mutations increased the likelihood of HSRs to carboplatin. The incidence of HSRs to paclitaxel and symptom grade based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0, were explored as secondary endpoints. A retrospective chart review of patients with ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer at the University of Arizona Cancer Center who underwent treatment with carboplatin-containing regimens and received genetic testing was performed. Institutional review board approval was obtained for this study. Fisher's exact test was used to analyze the primary outcome. Out of 167 initial patients, 62 with germline test results constituted the evaluable sample. 15 of 62 (24.2%) BRCA-tested patients were treated with carboplatin monotherapy, while 44 of 62 (71.0%) patients were treated with paclitaxel-containing regimens. Hypersensitivity reactions occurred in 4 of 13 (30.8%) BRCA-mutated patients and 22 of 49 (44.9%) BRCA wild-type patients (p = .5291). Hypersensitivity reactions to paclitaxel occurred in 1 of 13 (7.7%) BRCA-mutated patients and 26 of 49 (53.1%) BRCA wild-type patients (p = .0039). Overall, there were 11 grade 1 reactions, 14 grade 2 reactions, and 16 grade 3 reactions to carboplatin. All reactions to carboplatin in BRCA-mutated patients were grade 1. All paclitaxel reactions manifested as grade 2. The sample size was the main study limitation. The presence of BRCA mutations was not statistically significantly associated with a higher incidence of HSRs to carboplatin, but was statistically significant with regards to paclitaxel.

Novel Indications for Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors, beyond Hematological Malignancies

Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) is a critical terminal enzyme in the B-cell antigen receptor (BCR) pathway. BTK activation has been implicated in the pathogenesis of certain B-cell malignancies. Targeting this pathway has emerged as a novel target in B-cell malignancies, of which ibrutinib is the first-in-class agent. A few other BTK inhibitors (BTKi) are also under development (e.g., acalabrutinib). While the predominant action of BTKi is the blockade of B-cell receptor pathway within malignant B-cells, increasing the knowledge of off-target effects as well as a potential role for B-cells in proliferation of solid malignancies is expanding the indication of BTKi into non-hematological malignancies. In addition to the expansion of the role of BTKi monotherapy, combination therapy strategies utilizing ibrutinib with established regimens and combination with modern immunotherapy compounds are being explored.

A review of mirvetuximab soravtansine in the treatment of platinum-resistant ovarian cancer

Resistance to platinum-based therapy poses a significant clinical challenge for the management of advanced ovarian cancer, a leading cause of cancer mortality among women. Mirvetuximab soravtansine is a novel antibody–drug conjugate that targets folate receptor-α, a validated molecular target for therapeutic intervention in this disease. Here, we examine mirvetuximab soravtansine's mechanism of action and pharmacology, and review its clinical evaluation in ovarian cancer to date. We focus on the favorable tolerability and encouraging signals of efficacy that have emerged, most notably in patients with platinum-resistant disease. Ongoing Phase III monotherapy and Phase Ib/II combination trials evaluating its activity in the setting of platinum resistance are emphasized, which will help define its role in the evolving landscape of ovarian cancer therapy.

Outpatient desensitization in selected patients with platinum hypersensitivity reactions

Platinum-based chemotherapies are a standard treatment for both initial and recurrent gynecologic cancers. Given this widespread use, it is important to be aware of the features of platinum hypersensitivity reactions and the subsequent treatment of these reactions. There is also increasing interest in the development of desensitization protocols to allow patients with a history of platinum hypersensitivity to receive further platinum based therapy. In this review, we describe the management of platinum hypersensitivity reactions and the desensitization protocols utilized at our institution. We also describe the clinical categorizations utilized to triage patients to appropriate desensitization protocols.

Prevention of carboplatin-induced hypersensitivity reactions in women with ovarian cancer

Background

Carboplatin-based chemotherapy offers high response rates and improved overall survival for women with epithelial ovarian cancer, but its use is limited by the occurrence of hypersensitivity reactions. To evaluate the efficacy of prophylactic diphenhydramine for hypersensitivity reaction prevention, we reviewed the incidence of hypersensitivity reactions and identified patients at high risk of hypersensitivity reactions.

Methods

Women receiving ≥6 cycles of carboplatin-based chemotherapy for epithelial ovarian cancer were identified from our institutional database at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre. Institutional policy was changed in 2009 to introduce diphenhydramine prophylaxis for patients receiving ≥6 cycles of carboplatin. Additional clinical data were abstracted from the patient record.

Results

Between 2006 and 2012, 450 women received ≥6 cycles of carboplatin-based chemotherapy for epithelial ovarian cancer. Two hundred and ninety-one women received prophylaxis with diphenhydramine. Carboplatin-induced hypersensitivity reactions occurred in 41 of 449 patients (9%). Univariable predictors of carboplatin-induced hypersensitivity reactions included administration of 8 to 10 cycles of carboplatin, history of other drug allergies and a platinum-free interval >12 months. BRCA mutational status was not predictive. In a multivariable analysis, the number of cycles of carboplatin and a platinum-free interval >12 months were independent predictors of hypersensitivity reactions. There was a trend towards diphenhydramine prophylaxis reducing the incidence of hypersensitivity reactions in women with a platinum-free interval compared to continuous delivery; this was most marked when the platinum-free interval was >12 months (n = 64) (OR: 0.2 (95% CI: 0.046–0.83), p = 0.03).

Conclusions

The administration of diphenhydramine to women who have a platinum-free interval may reduce the risk of hypersensitivity reaction, but prospective evaluation is required.

Feasibility of interval cytoreduction following neoadjuvant chemotherapy with carboplatin, weekly paclitaxel, and bevacizumab for advanced ovarian cancer--a phase 1 study

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine a dosing schedule of neoadjuvant chemotherapy using carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab in women with advanced ovarian cancer, evaluating feasibility and outcomes from interval cytoreductive surgery (ICS).

METHODS

Using a "3+3" design, eligible patients received carboplatin (area under the curve, 5) and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) every 3 weeks with escalating doses of weekly paclitaxel (60, 70, and 80 mg/m) for 3 cycles. Patients then received 1 cycle of chemotherapy without bevacizumab followed by ICS. The primary objective was to determine a feasible dosing schedule. Secondary objectives included defining toxicity, response rates based on imaging, and surgical outcomes defined by residual disease following ICS and 30-day postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

Nine patients were enrolled with a median age of 64 years. There were no dose-limiting toxicities, and weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m was deemed feasible. During chemotherapy treatment, there were a total of 7 attributable grade 3 toxicities, which most commonly included neutropenia and thromboembolism. All patients demonstrated a response on imaging before surgery, with a median reduction in disease of 56.4% (range, 36.9%-100%). Optimal ICS was performed in all patients, and 78% had no gross residual tumor. There were no intraoperative complications; however, 1 patient experienced an anastomotic leak (grade 4) 10 days after surgery requiring repeat operation.

CONCLUSIONS

A 4-cycle neoadjuvant regimen of carboplatin area under the curve of 5, weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m, and bevacizumab 15 mg/kg for cycles 1 to 3, followed by interval cytoreduction, was feasible. Optimal ICS was achieved in all patients, and surgery was associated with acceptable morbidity.

(18)F-FDG Is a Surrogate Marker of Therapy Response and Tumor Recovery after Drug Withdrawal during Treatment with a Dual PI3K/mTOR Inhibitor in a Preclinical Model of Cisplatin-Resistant Ovarian Cancer

AIM

Targeting the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway is a potential means of overcoming chemoresistance in ovarian cancer. We investigated the capability of (18)F-fluororodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) small-animal positron emission tomography (SA-PET) to predict the effects of a dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor (BEZ-235) in a cisplatin-resistant ovarian cancer model.

METHODS

In a first experiment, nude rats bearing subcutaneous SKOV3 tumors received BEZ-235 for 3 days given alone or after paclitaxel and were compared to controls (either untreated or that were given the excipients of paclitaxel and BEZ-235). SA-PET was performed at baseline, on day 3, and day 7. In a second experiment aiming at further exploring the kinetics of (18)F-FDG tumor uptake during the first 48 hours following drug cessation, untreated controls were compared to rats receiving BEZ-235, which were imaged at baseline, on day 3, on day 4, and on day 5. SA-PET results were compared to cell proliferation assessment (Ki-67), PI3K/mTOR downstream target expression studies (pAKT and phospho-eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E-binding protein 1), and apoptosis evaluation (cleaved caspase-3).

RESULTS

In the first experiment, BEZ-235, compared to untreated controls, induced a marked decrease in (18)F-FDG uptake on day 3, which was correlated to a significant decrease in cell proliferation and to a significant PI3K/mTOR pathway inhibition. No tumor necrosis or apoptosis occurred. Four days following treatment cessation, tumor recovery (in terms of PI3K/mTOR inhibition and cell proliferation) occurred and was identified by (18)F-FDG SA-PET. Paclitaxel plus BEZ-235 showed results similar to BEZ-235 alone. In the second experiment, PI3K/mTOR pathways exhibited partial recovery as early as 24 hours following treatment cessation, but both (18)F-FDG SA-PET and cell proliferation remained unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS

(18)F-FDG SA-PET is a surrogate marker of target inhibition during treatment with BEZ-235 and predicts tumor recovery 4 days after drug withdrawal, but not during the first 48 hours following drug cessation, when a lag between PI3K/mTOR pathway recovery and metabolic recovery is observed. (18)F-FDG SA-PET could be used for therapy monitoring of PI3K/mTOR inhibitors, but our results also raise questions regarding the potential impact of the delay between PET imaging and the last drug intake on the accuracy of FDG imaging.

Long-term results of weekly paclitaxel carboplatin induction therapy: an effective and well-tolerated treatment in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

Weekly paclitaxel/cisplatin is effective in platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). To reduce toxicity, paclitaxel/cisplatin was replaced by paclitaxel/carboplatin.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with progressive EOC after prior 3-weekly paclitaxel/carboplatin were treated with six cycles weekly paclitaxel 90 mg/m(2) and carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) 4 mg/ml/min, followed by six cycles 3-weekly paclitaxel/carboplatin. End-points were progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), response rate (RR) and toxicity.

RESULTS

Median progression free interval after last platinum was 9 (0-81) months in 108 patients; 43 were platinum-resistant, of whom 13 started weekly paclitaxel/carboplatin <6 months after progression. During 633 weekly cycles grade 3/4 toxicity included; thrombocytopenia 8%, neutropenia 30%, febrile neutropenia 0.5%. Non-haematologic toxicity was low. Treatment was delayed in 16%, and dose reduced in 2% of cycles. RR was 58% for platinum-resistant and 76% for platinum-sensitive patients, median PFS were 8 (range 1-21) and 13 (1-46) months, median OS 15 (1-69) and 26 (4-93) months, respectively. The 13 platinum-resistant patients with a platinum-therapy free interval <6 months had a significant shorter PFS (4 versus 10 months, p=0.035) and OS (9 versus 15 months, p=0.002).

CONCLUSION

Six cycles weekly paclitaxel/carboplatin followed by six 3-weekly cycles is well-tolerated and highly active in platinum-resistant and platinum-sensitive patients.

Phase II clinical trial of bevacizumab with albumin-bound paclitaxel in patients with recurrent, platinum-resistant primary epithelial ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

We examined the safety and efficacy of combining bevacizumab with albumin-bound (ab-) paclitaxel to treat patients with recurrent, platinum-resistant primary epithelial ovarian or peritoneal carcinoma.

METHODS

Patients had measurable disease per RECIST guidelines, progressing within 6 months after a prior course of platinum-based treatment. Patients received ab-paclitaxel 100mg/m(2) given by intravenous infusion over 30 min on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle with bevacizumab 10mg/kg given on days 1 and 15.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients with an average 1.8 prior lines of treatment participated. The overall response rate was 50% (24/48) (95% CI, 34.8% - 65.1%), with 4 complete and 20 partial responses. Fourteen patients (29%) had stable disease, whereas eight (17%) had progressive disease, and two (4%) were not evaluable. Patients received a median of 6 treatment cycles (range, 1 - 31 cycles). The median progression-free survival was 8.08 months (95% CI, 5.78 - 10.15 months); 6 month progression-free rate was 62.5% (95% CI, 47.8%-77.2%); median overall survival was 17.15 months (95% CI, 13.57 - 23.82 months). Grade 3-4 adverse events included gastrointestinal disorders (18.8%), neutropenia (8.3%), and hypertension (6.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Ab-paclitaxel with bevacizumab clearly demonstrates antitumor activity and manageable toxicity profile in patients with recurrent, platinum-resistant ovarian carcinoma. This regimen should be evaluated in a larger randomized trial.

Evolving concepts in the management of drug resistant ovarian cancer: dose dense chemotherapy and the reversal of clinical platinum resistance

Despite the initially high response rate to standard front-line debulking surgery followed by platinum-based chemotherapy, the relapse rate in ovarian cancer is high and many patients will recur within 6 months of completing platinum based treatment. These patients may still require further chemotherapy despite being considered "platinum resistant". In this setting, response rates to conventionally scheduled second line platinum and non-platinum agents is low, ranging between 5% and 15%. There is an emerging body of evidence that in this scenario, chemotherapeutic activity can be enhanced using unconventionally scheduled "dose-dense" platinum and non-platinum based regimens with improved response rates of up to 65%. Randomised studies to evaluate the impact of this approach on survival in recurrent, platinum resistant disease are urgently required to confirm the promising phase II findings if there is to be a change in the standard of care of patients with platinum resistant disease. In this review we discuss the evolving strategies to overcome resistance in patients with platinum resistant ovarian cancer with a particular focus on alterations in dose schedule as a means of reversing platinum resistance.

Dose-dense therapy is of benefit in primary treatment of ovarian cancer: contra

Several studies in the past have tried to improve the prognosis of ovarian cancer by increasing the dose intensity of platinum. Only 2 out of 12 randomized studies showed survival benefit at the cost of significant long-term toxicity. Dose-dense induction therapy with combined weekly paclitaxel (at a dose of 90 mg/m(2)) and weekly carboplatin [at an area under the curve (AUC) of 4 mg·ml/min] followed by 3-weekly paclitaxel/carboplatin was very effective in platinum-resistant patients (response 58%, progression-free survival 10 months). In first-line, however, no survival benefit was found with the same dose-dense weekly paclitaxel/carboplatin regimen over standard-dosed 3-weekly paclitaxel/carboplatin in a randomized study. Very recently, the Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group (JGOG) study no. 3016, randomizing patients in first-line between dose-dense weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m(2) plus 3-weekly carboplatin AUC 6 and 3-weekly paclitaxel/carboplatin, showed a significant increase in progression-free survival (median 28 versus 17.2 months in the control arm; hazard ratio for progression, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.58-0.88; P=0.0015). The 3-year overall survival was 72% versus 65% (P=0.03), respectively. The hematologic toxicity was substantial in both arms and substantially higher than observed with the weekly paclitaxel/carboplatin induction regimen. Many patients had treatment delays, dose reductions and stopped treatment prematurely. The JGOG 3016 study is the only dose-dense study with such a significant survival benefit. It is also the only dose-intensity study performed in Asian patients. Genotypes and phenotypes are thought to represent important determinants of drug efficacy in ovarian cancer. Therefore, confirmatory studies with this JGOG regimen together with translational research are needed in both Caucasian and Asian patients.

Clinical trials and decision-making strategies for optimal treatment of relapsed ovarian cancer

The proportion of patients with advanced ovarian cancer who relapse has remained high and fairly constant over the last decade. Choosing treatment for recurrent ovarian cancer is complex. Many active therapeutic agents are available, and there are challenges in defining the optimal timing and sequencing of treatments. Furthermore, the explosion in the number of biological agents presents additional challenges in identifying their activity and place in the pathway of treatment. Establishing optimal treatment as monotherapy, or in combination with chemotherapy, or as maintenance treatment requires new approaches to trial design, selecting meaningful endpoints and conducting carefully conducted trials with translational studies. Patients with relapsed ovarian cancer can now survive several years; the aim is to increase this further.

Hypersensitivity reactions associated with platinum antineoplastic agents: a systematic review

Platinum-containing chemotherapy agents (cisplatin, carboplatin, oxaliplatin) have been approved in the first-line setting of numerous malignancies, such as ovarian, bladder, head and neck, colorectal, and lung cancer. Their extensive use over the last decade has led to a significant increase in the incidence of hypersensitivity reactions, which are defined as unforeseen reactions whose signs and symptoms cannot be explained by the known toxicity of these drugs. Skin rash, flushing, abdominal cramping, itchy palms, and back pain are common symptoms. Cardiovascular and respiratory complications can prove fatal. Multiple pathogenetic mechanisms have been suggested. Hypersensitivity usually appears after multiple infusions, suggesting type I allergic reactions; however, other types of hypersensitivity also seem to be implicated. Several management options are available to treating physicians: discontinuation of chemotherapy, premedication, prolonging of infusion duration, desensitization protocols, and replacement with a different platinum compound after performing skin tests that rule out cross-reactions among platinum agents.