Stage IA vs. IB endometrial stromal sarcoma: Does the new staging system predict survival?

The value of surgery and the prognostic factors for patients with recurrent low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: a retrospective study of 38 patients

OBJECTIVE

As an indolent malignant tumor, the long-term management of low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LGESS) patients required awareness, especially the management of recurrences. Unfortunately, few studies focused on the treatment of recurrent LGESS. Our study aimed to investigate the prognostic factors and the value of recurrent surgery on recurrent LGESS.

METHODS

This retrospective study consecutively recruited patients with pathologically diagnosed recurrent LGESS at our center from April 1, 2004 to April 1, 2020.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 137.0 months (95% confidence interval=85.4-188.6), the 5-year cumulative survival rate of the cohort of 38 patients with recurrent LGESS was 71.1%. The median overall survival (OS) and post-recurrence survival (PRS) was 156 and 89.0 months. Survival analysis showed that patients with younger age, positive estrogen receptor (ER) and optimal abdominopelvic debulking in the first recurrent surgery had better prognosis (p<0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that optimal abdominopelvic debulking in the first recurrent surgery was the only independent prognostic factor for OS and PRS (OS=216.0/35.0 months, hazard ratio [HR]=5.319, p=0.034; PRS=not reached/4.0 months, HR=10.900, p=0.006). There was no significant difference in OS and PRS between patients recurred only once and those recurred at least twice (p>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The prognosis of recurrent LGESS was favorable. Optimal debulking of no residual tumor in abdominal and pelvic cavity should be the first choice of treatment for recurrent patients, while preservation of ovary or fertility should not be recommended.

Prognostic factors in undifferentiated uterine sarcoma: a subanalysis of the SARCUT study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to analyze the prognostic factors related to the recurrence rate and overall survival of patients with undifferentiated uterine sarcoma.

METHODS

An international multicenter study involving 43 international centers, the SARCUT study, collected 966 uterine sarcoma cases; among them 39 cases corresponded to undifferentiated uterine sarcoma and where included in the present subanalysis. The risk factors related to the oncological outcomes where analyzed.

RESULTS

The median age of the patients was 63 (range 14-85) years. Seventeen (43.5%) patients presented FIGO stage I. The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 15.3% and 12-months disease-free survival (DFS) 41%. FIGO stage I was significantly associated with a better prognosis. In addition, patients who received adjuvant radiotherapy showed significant longer disease-free survival compared to those without adjuvant radiotherapy (20.5 vs. 4.0 months, respectively; p = 0.04) and longer overall survival (34.7 vs. 18.2 months, respectively; p = 0.05). Chemotherapy administration was associated with shorter DFS (HR 4.41, 95% CI 1.35-14.43, p = 0.014). Persistent disease after primary treatment (HR = 6.86, 95% CI 1.51-31.09, p = 0.012) and FIGO stage IV (HR 4.12, 95%CI 1.37-12.44, p = 0.011) showed significant worse prognosis for OS.

CONCLUSION

FIGO stage seems to be the most important prognostic factor in patients with undifferentiated uterine sarcoma. Adjuvant radiotherapy seems to be significantly associated also to a better disease-free and overall survival. On the contrary, the role of chemotherapy administration remains unclear since was associated to a shorted DFS.

Endometrial stromal tumors of the uterus: Epidemiology, pathological and biological features, treatment options and clinical outcomes

Endometrial stromal tumors (EST) are uterine mesenchymal tumors, which histologically resemble endometrial stroma of the functioning endometrium. The majority of EST are malignant tumors classified as low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS), high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (HG-ESS), and undifferentiated uterine sarcoma (UUS). Overall, ESTs are rare malignancies, with an annual incidence of approximately 0.30 per 100'000 women, mainly affecting peri- or postmenopausal women. The most common genetic alteration identified in LG-ESS is the JAZF1-SUZ12 rearrangement, while t(10;17)(q23,p13) translocation and BCOR gene abnormalities characterize two major subtypes of HG-ESS. The absence of specific genetic abnormalities is the actual hallmark of UUS. Unlike HG-ESSs, LG-ESSs usually express estrogen and progesterone receptors. Total hysterectomy without morcellation and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) is the first-line treatment of early-stage LG-ESS. Ovarian preservation, fertility-sparing treatment, and adjuvant hormonal therapy ± radiotherapy may be an option in selected cases. In advanced or recurrent LG-ESS, surgical cytoreduction followed by hormonal treatment, or vice versa, are acceptable treatments. The standard treatment for apparently early-stage HG-ESS and UUS is total hysterectomy without morcellation with BSO. Ovarian preservation and adjuvant chemotherapy ± radiotherapy may be an option. In advanced or recurrent HG-ESS, surgical cytoreduction and neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy can be considered. Alternative treatments, including biological agents and immunotherapy, are under investigation. LG-ESSs are indolent tumor with a 5-year overall survival (OS) of 80-100% and present as stage I-II at diagnosis in two third of patients. HG-ESSs carry a poor prognosis, with a median OS ranging from 11 to 24 months, and 70% of patients are in stage III-IV at presentation. UUS median OS ranges from 12 to 23 months and, at diagnosis, 70% of patients are in stage III-IV. The aim of this review is to assess the clinical, pathological, and biological features and the therapeutic options for malignant ESTs.

Primary characteristics and outcomes of newly diagnosed low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma

OBJECTIVE

To assess potential predictive variables for nodal metastasis and survival outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed, low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma.

METHODS

We performed a single-institution, retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with newly diagnosed, low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma who presented between January 1, 1980 and December 31, 2019 and underwent hysterectomy at our institution or presented within 3 months of primary surgery elsewhere before recurrence. Patients who presented to our institution only at recurrence were excluded. Patients with <3 months of follow-up were excluded from survival analyses.

RESULTS

We identified 127 consecutive patients for analysis. Median age at diagnosis was 48 years (range 19-88 years); 91 (74.6%) of 127 were pre-menopausal; and 74 (58.3%) of 127 had uterine-confined, stage I tumors. Of 56 patients (44.1%) who underwent lymph node sampling, 10 (17.9%) had nodal metastasis. Of the 10 with nodal metastasis, 1 (10%) did not have lymphadenopathy or extra-uterine disease, 4 (40%) had lymphadenopathy only, 1 (10%) had extra-uterine disease only, and 4 (40%) had both. Among the 29 patients without apparent extra-uterine disease or gross lymphadenopathy, there was one occult lymph node metastasis (3.4%). Gross lymphadenopathy at time of surgery was predictive for lymph node metastasis (p<0.001). Median follow-up was 69 months (range 4-336) for the 95 patients included in the survival analyses. The 5-year progression-free survival and disease-specific survival rates were 79.8% and 90.8%, respectively. Patients with stage I tumors had longer progression-free survival than those with stage II-IV disease (p<0.001); there was no difference in disease-specific survival (p=0.63). Post-operative observation versus adjuvant therapy with hormone blockade or radiation therapy did not result in progression-free survival differences for stage I or completely resected stage II-IV disease (p=0.50 and p=0.81, respectively). Similarly, there was no disease-specific survival difference for completely resected stage II-IV disease (p=0.3).

CONCLUSIONS

Lymph node dissection in patients with low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma should be reserved for those with clinically suspicious lymphadenopathy. Disease stage correlated with progression-free survival but not disease-specific survival. Post-operative therapy did not improve progression-free survival or disease-specific survival.

Low-Grade Uterine Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma: Prognostic Analysis of Clinico-Pathological Characteristics, Surgical Management, and Adjuvant Treatments. Experience From Two Referral Centers

Objective

Low-grade uterine endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS) is a rare tumor characterized by an overall good survival but showing a indolent behavior and a variable risk of recurrence. There is no clear consensus on the optimal management of these tumors and no prognostic or predictive factors have been established. With this study, we evaluated the prognostic relevance of several clinical, surgical, and pathological features in patients affected by LG-ESS to identify risk factors associated with recurrence.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 52 LG-ESS cases, treated from January 1st, 1994, to May 31st, 2020, in two referral centers. The relationship between recurrence and clinicopathological characteristics as well as surgical treatment was investigated. Risk of recurrence and disease-free survival (DFS) were estimated by Cox regression and the Kaplan-Meier analysis, respectively.

Results

Of 52 patients with LG-ESS, 8 experienced recurrence (15%). The median follow-up was 100 months (SD ± 96, range: 15–336). By univariate analysis, fragmentation/morcellation, tumor size, FIGO stage, higher mitotic count, presence of necrosis, and lymphovascular space invasion (LSVI) resulted associated with a poorer outcome. Conversely, the surgical modality (laparotomic vs laparoscopic and hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy vs local excision) and pelvic lymphadenectomy were not. Even the different modalities of adjuvant therapy (hormonal therapy, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy) showed no prognostic significance. Tumor fragmentation/morcellation and higher mitotic count resulted independent prognostic variables at multivariate analysis.

Conclusions

This data supports the avoidance of any type of morcellation if LG-ESS is suspected preoperatively. Higher mitotic count and, possibly, tumor size, advanced FIGO stage, necrosis, and LVSI could be exploited to tailor the adjuvant therapy, but these results need to be confirmed in larger prospective studies.

Clinicopathological characteristics and treatment of patients with high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: A retrospective study of 40 cases

To investigate the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (HG-ESS).The clinicopathological characteristics, treatments, and prognostic information of consecutive HG-ESS patients were collected from medical records and then evaluated.A total of 40 women were included in the analysis. The immunohistochemical profiles indicated that HG-ESS tumors tend to be locally or weakly positive for vimentin (100%) and CD10 (72.0%) but mostly negative for desmin (7.7%) and AE1/AE3 (9.1%). The progression-free survival intervals and the clinical benefit rates of patients receiving radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy were slightly longer and higher than those receiving simple observation (progression-free survival: 6 and 5 months vs 2 months; clinical benefit rate: 83.3% and 75.0% vs 28.6%). The 1-year disease-specific survival (DSS) rate was 62.7%. Tumor size, myometrial invasion, lymphovascular space invasion, cervical involvement, Federation International of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, and residual disease all significantly affected the DSS rate (P < .001, =.002, <.001, =.004, <.001, and <.001, respectively). For patients with stage I disease, the 1-year DSS rate was as high as 91.7%, in contrast to 66.7%, 26.7%, and 0% for those with stage II, III, and IV disease, respectively.HG-ESS is associated with an adverse prognosis. FIGO stage could effectively predict the prognosis of patients with this lethal disease. Immunohistochemical markers, vimentin+/CD10+ (local or very weak), in combination with desmin-/AE1/AE3-, may be helpful for improving the diagnostic accuracy of this lethal condition. The therapeutic roles of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy warrant further investigation.

[Interdisciplinary S2k guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of uterine sarcomas-recommendations for surgical pathology]

Uterine sarcomas represent a heterogeneous group of rare malignancies, derived from the myometrium, the endometrial stroma, and very rarely from the nonspecialized uterine soft tissue. The actual incidence is about 1.5 for Caucasian and 3.0 for Afro-American women. There is no grading system for leimoysarcoma defined by the WHO classification; however, if clinicians request, the FNCLCC grading can be specified in analogy to soft tissue sarcomas. Adenosarcomas must be distinguished from adenofibromas (the existence of which is questionable)-with the vast majority of these tumors being uterine adenosarcomas. Within adenosarcomas, deep myometrial invasion (>50%), sarcomatous overgrowth, and a high-grade heterologous component are associated with a higher recurrence rate and poor survival. The immunohistochemical panel represents a very helpful tool for distinguishing low-grade from high grade endometrial stromal sarcomas (ESS) and may be supplemented by molecular analyses. Steroid hormone receptor analysis should be performed for all ESS due to the possible therapeutic relevance. Undifferentiated uterine sarcomas represent a diagnosis of exclusion and have a very poor prognosis. Carcinosarcomas represent a special subtype of endometrial carcinomas and are in fact not uterine sarcomas. Uterine sarcomas may present substantial intratumoral heterogeneity and adequate embedding is mandatory. Lesions ≤2 cm in the largest dimension should be processed completely and larger tumors should be processed with one block per centimeter for the largest tumor dimension.

Prognostic nomogram for predicting survival in patients with high grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: a Surveillance Epidemiology, and End Results database analysis

OBJECTIVE

High grade endometrial stromal sarcoma is a rare and highly malignant tumor that lacks a prognostic model. The aim of this study was to develop a prognostic nomogram predicting the overall survival of patients with high grade endometrial stromal sarcoma.

METHODS

Clinical data for patients were derived from the Surveillance Epidemiology, and End Results database. Cox analysis and Akaike's information criterion were used to construct the nomogram. The concordance index, time dependent receiver operating characteristic curve, and calibration plot were used to evaluate the discriminative and calibrating capability. The net reclassification index, integrated discrimination improvement, and concordance index change were also compared between the nomogram and the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage. Clinical benefit was evaluated using decision curve analysis. The patients were separated into groups with low and high nomogram risk scores. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis and Cox analysis were used to investigate the survival difference between the two groups.

RESULTS

The training and validation cohorts had 461 and 195 patients, respectively. A nomogram that incorporated disease stage, age, surgery, lymph node status, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy for predicting overall survival was established and validated. The concordance index of the nomogram was 0.734 (0.708-0.761) in the training cohort and 0.705 (0.659-0.751) in the validation cohort. The calibration plots showed a favorable calibrating ability of the nomogram. The 1 year and 3 year time dependent receiver operating characteristic curves showed the better discriminative ability of the nomogram than the staging system. The concordance index change, net reclassification index, and integrated discrimination improvement also indicated a significantly (p<0.05) better predictive power of the nomogram over disease stage. Furthermore, decision curve analysis suggested that the nomogram was clinically useful and had a larger clinical net benefit than disease stage alone. Patients with a high risk score had distinctly poorer survival than those with low risk scores.

CONCLUSIONS

A prognostic nomogram in patients with high grade endometrial stromal sarcoma exhibited favorable prognostic discrimination and survival prediction ability compared with FIGO stage.

Endometrial stromal sarcoma: A review of rare mesenchymal uterine neoplasm

OBJECTIVE

This review aims to analyze the pathological aspects, diagnosis and treatment of rare mesenchymal uterine tumors.

METHODS

On August 2019, a systematic review of the literature was done on Pubmed, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Google Scholar search engines. The systematic review was carried out in agreement with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyzes statement (PRISMA). The following words and key phrases have been searched: "endometrial stromal sarcoma", "low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma", "high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma", "uterine sarcoma", "mesenchymal uterine tumors" and "uterine stromal sarcoma". Across these platforms and research studies, five main aspects were analyzed: the biological characteristics of the neoplasms, the number of cases, the different therapeutic approaches used, the follow-up and the oncological outcomes.

RESULTS

Of the 94 studies initially identified, 55 were chosen selecting articles focusing on endometrial stromal sarcoma. Of these fifty-five studies, 46 were retrospective in design, 7 were reviews and 2 randomized phases III trials.

CONCLUSION

Endometrial stromal sarcomas are rare mesenchymal uterine neoplasms and surgery represents the standard treatment. For uterus-limited disease, the remove en bloc with an intact resection of the tumor (without the use of morcellation) is strongly recommended. For advanced-stage disease, the standard surgical treatment is adequate cytoreduction with metastatectomy. Pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy is not recommended in patients with Low-grade Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma (ESS), while is not clear whether cytoreduction of advanced tumors improves patient survival in High-grade ESS. Administration of adjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy is not routinely used and its role is still debated.

A nomogram for predicting overall survival in patients with low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: A population-based analysis

Background

Low‐grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG‐ESS) is a rare tumor that lacks a prognostic prediction model. Our study aimed to develop a nomogram to predict overall survival of LG‐ESS patients.

Methods

A total of 1172 patients confirmed to have LG‐ESS between 1988 and 2015 were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. They were further divided into a training cohort and a validation cohort. The Akaike information criterion was used to select variables for the nomogram. The discrimination and calibration of the nomogram were evaluated using concordance index (C‐index), area under time‐dependent receiver operating characteristic curve (time‐dependent AUC), and calibration plots. The net benefits of the nomogram at different threshold probabilities were quantified and compared with those of the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) criteria‐based tumor staging using decision curve analysis (DCA). Net reclassification index (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) were also used to compare the nomogram's clinical utility with that of the FIGO criteria‐based tumor staging. The risk stratifications of the nomogram and the FIGO criteria‐based tumor staging were compared.

Results

Seven variables were selected to establish the nomogram for LG‐ESS. The C‐index (0.814 for the training cohort and 0.837 for the validation cohort) and the time‐dependent AUC (> 0.7) indicated satisfactory discriminative ability of the nomogram. The calibration plots showed favorable consistency between the prediction of the nomogram and actual observations in both the training and validation cohorts. The NRI values (training cohort: 0.271 for 5‐year and 0.433 for 10‐year OS prediction; validation cohort: 0.310 for 5‐year and 0.383 for 10‐year OS prediction) and IDI (training cohort: 0.146 for 5‐year and 0.185 for 10‐year OS prediction; validation cohort: 0.177 for 5‐year and 0.191 for 10‐year OS prediction) indicated that the established nomogram performed significantly better than the FIGO criteria‐based tumor staging alone (P < 0.05). Furthermore, DCA showed that the nomogram was clinically useful and had better discriminative ability to recognize patients at high risk than the FIGO criteria‐based tumor staging.

Conclusions

A prognostic nomogram was developed and validated to assist clinicians in evaluating prognosis of LG‐ESS patients.

Recurrence after fertility-preserving surgery for low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma

Considering the characteristics of low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS), such as relative indolent course, younger age at diagnosis and favorable prognosis, the fertility-preserving management of low-grade ESS has been described by several authors. We report a 34-year-old female with stage IB low-grade ESS who developed recurrence 7 years after neoadjuvant high-dose progestin therapy followed by fertility-preserving surgery and postoperative progestin therapy. The patient stopped progestin therapy and was disease free for 4 years after diagnosis but experienced recurrence with peritoneal dissemination at 7 years. Considering the tendency of late recurrence, long-term surveillance is necessary to ensure timely action. Long-term progestin treatment might be considered after complete remission even beyond 5 years. We performed a literature review and found that many of the cases did not meet solid pathological criteria of low-grade ESS. The diagnostic criteria of low-grade ESS (vs endometrial stromal nodule) should be deliberately documented for future studies of this rare disease.

Uterine sarcoma Part II-Uterine endometrial stromal sarcoma: The TAG systematic review

Endometrial stromal tumors are rare uterine tumors (<1%). Four main categories include endometrial stromal nodule, low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS), high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (HG-ESS), and uterine undifferentiated sarcoma (UUS). This review is a series of articles discussing the uterine sarcomas. LG-ESS, a hormone-dependent tumor harboring chromosomal rearrangement, is an indolent tumor with a favorable prognosis, but characterized by late recurrences even in patients with Stage I disease, suggesting the requirement of a long-term follow-up. Patients with HG-ESS, based on the identification of YWHAE-NUTM2A/B (YWHAE-FAM22A/B) gene fusion, typically present with advanced stage diseases and frequently have recurrences, usually within a few years after initial surgery. UUS is, a high-grade sarcoma, extremely rare, lacking a specific line of differentiation, which is a diagnosis of exclusion (the wastebasket category, which fails to fulfill the morphological and immunohistochemical criteria of translocation-positive ESS). Surgery is the main strategy in the management of uterine sarcoma. Due to rarity, complex biological characteristics, and unknown etiology and risk factors of uterine sarcomas, the role of adjuvant therapy is not clear. Only LG-ESS might respond to progestins or aromatase inhibitors.

Potential Therapeutic Targets in Uterine Sarcomas

Uterine sarcomas are rare tumors accounting for 3,4% of all uterine cancers. Even after radical hysterectomy, most patients relapse or present with distant metastases. The very limited clinical benefit of adjuvant cytotoxic treatments is reflected by high mortality rates, emphasizing the need for new treatment strategies. This review summarizes rising potential targets in four distinct subtypes of uterine sarcomas: leiomyosarcoma, low-grade and high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma, and undifferentiated uterine sarcoma. Based on clinical reports, promising approaches for uterine leiomyosarcoma patients include inhibition of VEGF and mTOR signaling, preferably in combination with other targeted or cytotoxic compounds. Currently, the only targeted therapy approved in leiomyosarcoma patients is pazopanib, a multitargeted inhibitor blocking VEGFR, PDGFR, FGFR, and c-KIT. Additionally, preclinical evidence suggests effect of the inhibition of histone deacetylases, tyrosine kinase receptors, and the mitotic checkpoint protein aurora kinase A. In low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas, antihormonal therapies including aromatase inhibitors and progestins have proven activity. Other potential targets are PDGFR, VEGFR, and histone deacetylases. In high-grade ESS that carry the YWHAE/FAM22A/B fusion gene, the generated 14-3-3 oncoprotein is a putative target, next to c-KIT and the Wnt pathway. The observation of heterogeneity within uterine sarcoma subtypes warrants a personalized treatment approach.

Low-Grade Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma with Inferior Vena Cava Extension: First Report in Korea

Low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LGESS) with intravascular extension is very rare, with only 26 cases having been reported. We experienced a case of LGESS with inferior vena cava (IVC) extension. A 60-year-old female presented with left leg edema. She had a history of total hysterectomy, and was diagnosed of leiomyoma at that time. On imaging study, tumor masses were located around both common iliac veins (CIV), and within the CIV and IVC. The pelvic masses on both side and IVC mass were resected, and then the patient received adjuvant hormonal therapy and radiotherapy over the remnant pelvic masses. LGESS with IVC extension is difficult to distinguish from intravascular leiomyomatosis. LGESS is a malignant disease and commonly recurs, even in early stages. Accurate diagnosis, complete resection, proper adjuvant therapy and close follow-up are very important.

Current concepts in the imaging of uterine sarcoma

Recent advances in genetics and pathology have improved our understanding of diagnosis and staging of uterine sarcomas. The major types of uterine sarcomas include leiomyosarcoma, low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma, undifferentiated endometrial sarcoma, adenosarcoma and carcinosarcoma. The distinctive biological behavior and poor overall survival of uterine sarcoma create challenges in the management of these tumors. We herein present a comprehensive review of taxonomy, epidemiology, pathology, imaging findings and natural history of a wide spectrum of uterine sarcomas.

Staging of uterine sarcomas

Uterine sarcomas comprise leiomyosarcoma, endometrial stromal sarcoma, adenosarcoma, undifferentiated endometrial sarcoma, and their variants. Carcinosarcoma is historically classified as sarcoma, but it is now regarded as a metaplastic carcinoma. Uterine sarcomas are rare, and are traditionally staged in the same way as endometrial carcinoma. Because of their different clinical and biological behaviours, the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics introduced a new staging system in 2009 for leiomyosarcoma, endometrial stromal sarcoma and adenosarcoma, and carcinosarcoma, respectively. Following an extensive literature review no good evidence was found to support the modification of the staging system. This is mainly because of the rarity of the sarcomas and the heterogeneity of the reports, the different diagnostic criteria and treatments changing over the decades the retrospective nature and small sample size in most studies, and the lack of uniform pathological review even in large studies. Currently, evidence is still lacking about the use of preoperative imaging for staging purpose, and uterine sarcomas remain to be surgically staged. Total hysterectomy is the cornerstone for both staging and treatment. Newer evidence shows that routine lymphadenectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy may not be necessary, unless in the presence of extra-uterine spread, suspicious ovaries or lymph nodes, and certain poor histological types, such as undifferentiated endometrial sarcoma and adenosarcoma with sarcomatous overgrowth. More research and data collection are definitely needed in order to verify and further revise the current staging systems.