A longitudinal evaluation of sexual functioning and quality of life in cervical cancer survivors

Nonsurgical management of cervical cancer: locally advanced, recurrent, and metastatic disease, survivorship, and beyond

Despite the declining incidence of cervical cancer as a result of the introduction of screening programs, globally it remains a leading cause of cancer-related death in women. Outcomes for patients who are diagnosed with anything but early-stage disease remain poor. Here we examine emerging strategies to improve the treatment of locally advanced disease. We discuss emerging biologic data, which are informing our investigation of new therapeutic interventions in persistent, recurrent, and metastatic cervical cancer. We recognize the importance of interventions to improve quality of life and to prevent long-term sequelae in women undergoing treatment. Finally, and perhaps most importantly, we recognize the need for global collaboration and advocacy to improve the outcome for all women at risk of and diagnosed with this disease.

Factors associated with poor quality of life among cervical cancer survivors: implications for clinical care and clinical trials

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study is to identify factors that are associated with poor quality of life (QOL) among cervical cancer survivors.

METHODS

Patients identified through the California Cancer Registry were recruited to participate in a randomized counseling intervention. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were collected at study baseline (9-30 months post-diagnosis) and subsequent to the intervention. Multivariable linear models were used to identify independent factors associated with poor baseline QOL.

RESULTS

Non-Hispanic (N=121) and Hispanic (N=83) women aged 22-73 completed baseline measures. Approximately 50% of participants received radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy. Compared to the US population, cervical cancer patients reported lower QOL and significantly higher levels of depression and anxiety (26% and 28% >1 SD above the general population means, respectively). Among those in the lowest quartile for QOL, 63% had depression levels >1 SD above the mean. In addition, treatment with radiation±chemotherapy (p=0.014), and self-reported comorbidities predating the cancer diagnosis (p<0.001) were associated with lower QOL. Sociodemographic characteristics explained only a small portion of variance in QOL (r(2)=0.23). Persistent gynecologic problems, low social support, depression, somatization, less adaptive coping, comorbidities, sleep problems and low education were all independently associated with low QOL in multivariate analysis (r(2)=0.74).

CONCLUSION

We have identified key psychological and physical health factors that contribute significantly to poor quality of life subsequent to definitive cancer treatment. The majority of these factors are amenable to supportive care interventions and should be evaluated at the time of primary treatment.