Postoperative pelvic intensity-modulated radiotherapy in high risk endometrial cancer

Weekly Image Guidance in Patients With Cervical Cancer Treated With Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy: Results of a Large Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Image guidance is recommended for patients undergoing intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for cervical cancer. In this study, we evaluated the feasibility of a weekly image guidance pattern and analyzed the long-term outcomes in a large cohort of patients.

METHODS

The study enrolled patients with Stage IB-IVA cervical cancer who received definitive radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy. IMRT was delivered at a dose of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions, with weekly cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Physicians advised patients on rectum and bladder preparation to help them prepare on nonimaging guidance days. When significant tumor regression was observed, a second computed tomography simulation and replanning were performed.

RESULTS

The median follow-up periods were 63.4 months. The incidence rates of loco-regional and distant failure were 9.9% and 13.6%. The 5-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), loco-regional relapse-free survival (LRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rates were 80.1%, 72.9%, 78.3%, and 74.8%, respectively. For patients with different stages, the 5-year OS, DFS, LRFS, and DMFS rates were statistically significant. For patients with and without positive regional lymph nodes, the 5-year OS, DFS, LRFS, and DMFS rates were 64.5% and 86.0%, 56.8% and 78.8%, 62.7% and 84.3%, and 58.8% and 81.0%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that age, histology, tumor size, cancer stage, pretreatment squamous cell carcinoma antigen level, and para-aortic metastatic lymph nodes were independent prognostic factors of OS. Fifty-six (4.0%) patients experienced late Grade 3/4 chronic toxicities.

CONCLUSIONS

IMRT with weekly CBCT is an acceptable image guidance strategy in countries with limited medical resources.

Moderated Hypofractionated Online Adaptive Radiotherapy in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Case Report

Cervical cancer is one of the most frequent malignant tumors in females. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is one of the treatment options for cervical cancer. The treatment time of conventional radiotherapy is long. Moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy (MHRT) offers the advantage of shortening the overall treatment duration and enhancing the radiobiological effects on tumors. MHRT shortens the overall treatment duration while enhancing the radiobiological effects on tumors. Previous studies have reported that MHRT of cervical cancer has relatively high toxicity. Daily online adaptive radiation therapy (oART) showed improvements in dosimetry and a decrease in toxicity. To the best of our knowledge, this case was the first reported case of moderated hypofractionated oART used in a cervical cancer patient to date in a prospective clinical trial (NCT05994300). This case serves as a critical reminder that cervical cancer is a potential tumor that may be in MHRT with iterative cone beam computed tomography-guided oART. Further data are needed to confirm the toxicity and efficacy of this technique.

Pelvic target volume inter-fractional motion during radiotherapy for cervical cancer with daily iterative cone beam computed tomography

BACKGROUND

Tumor regression and organ movements indicate that a large margin is used to ensure target volume coverage during radiotherapy. This study aimed to quantify inter-fractional movements of the uterus and cervix in patients with cervical cancer undergoing radiotherapy and to evaluate the clinical target volume (CTV) coverage.

METHODS

This study analyzed 303 iterative cone beam computed tomography (iCBCT) scans from 15 cervical cancer patients undergoing external beam radiotherapy. CTVs of the uterus (CTV-U) and cervix (CTV-C) contours were delineated based on each iCBCT image. CTV-U encompassed the uterus, while CTV-C included the cervix, vagina, and adjacent parametrial regions. Compared with the planning CTV, the movement of CTV-U and CTV-C in the anterior-posterior, superior-inferior, and lateral directions between iCBCT scans was measured. Uniform expansions were applied to the planning CTV to assess target coverage.

RESULTS

The motion (mean ± standard deviation) in the CTV-U position was 8.3 ± 4.1 mm in the left, 9.8 ± 4.4 mm in the right, 12.6 ± 4.0 mm in the anterior, 8.8 ± 5.1 mm in the posterior, 5.7 ± 5.4 mm in the superior, and 3.0 ± 3.2 mm in the inferior direction. The mean CTV-C displacement was 7.3 ± 3.2 mm in the left, 8.6 ± 3.8 mm in the right, 9.0 ± 6.1 mm in the anterior, 8.4 ± 3.6 mm in the posterior, 5.0 ± 5.0 mm in the superior, and 3.0 ± 2.5 mm in the inferior direction. Compared with the other tumor (T) stages, CTV-U and CTV-C motion in stage T1 was larger. A uniform CTV planning treatment volume margin of 15 mm failed to encompass the CTV-U and CTV-C in 11.1% and 2.2% of all fractions, respectively. The mean volume change of CTV-U and CTV-C were 150% and 51%, respectively, compared with the planning CTV.

CONCLUSIONS

Movements of the uterine corpus are larger than those of the cervix. The likelihood of missing the CTV is significantly increased due to inter-fractional motion when utilizing traditional planning margins. Early T stage may require larger margins. Personal radiotherapy margining is needed to improve treatment accuracy.

Improving normal tissue sparing using scripting in endometrial cancer radiation therapy planning

The aim of this study was to improve the protection of organs at risk (OARs), decrease the total planning time and maintain sufficient target doses using scripting endometrial cancer external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) planning. Computed tomography (CT) data of 14 endometrial cancer patients were included in this study. Manual and automatic planning with scripting were performed for each CT. Scripts were created in the RayStation™ (RaySearch Laboratories AB, Stockholm, Sweden) planning system using a Python code. In scripting, seven additional contours were automatically created to reduce the OAR doses. The scripted and manual plans were compared to each other in terms of planning time, dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters, and total monitor unit (MU) values. While the mean total planning time for manual planning was 368 ± 8 s, it was only 55 ± 2 s for the automatic planning with scripting (p < 0.001). The mean doses of OARs decreased with automatic planning (p < 0.001). In addition, the maximum doses (D2% and D1%) for bilateral femoral heads and the rectum were significantly reduced. It was observed that the total MU value increased from 1146 ± 126 (manual planning) to 1369 ± 95 (scripted planning). It is concluded that scripted planning has significant time and dosimetric advantages over manual planning for endometrial cancer EBRT planning.

Outcome and safety analysis of endometrial cancer patients treated with postoperative 3D-conformal radiotherapy or intensity modulated radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

We sought to analyze the toxicity rates and the treatment outcomes in endometrial cancer (EC) patients treated with postoperative three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The clinical data of 646 EC patients treated with postoperative adjuvant 3DCRT (265 patients, 41%) or with IMRT (381 patients, 59%) between April 2007 and August 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoints were treatment-related acute and late gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicities. The secondary endpoints were LC and overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

Median follow-up time was 37 months. The rates for acute GI and GU toxicities of any grade for the entire group were 55.6% and 46.8%, respectively. Acute grade ≥2 GI toxicity was significantly less in patients treated with IMRT compared to those treated with 3DCRT (11.0% vs. 19.2%, p=.004). However, no significant difference grade ≥2 GU toxicities was observed between the 3DCRT and IMRT groups (15.1% vs. 11.0%; p=.15). Acute grade ≥2 GI and GU toxicities were higher in patients receiving systemic chemotherapy, while paraaortic field irradiation increases only the risk of acute grade ≥2 GI toxicity. Estimated 3-year late grade ≥3 GI toxicity rates in the 3DCRT- and IMRT-treated patients were 4.6% and 1.9% (p= .03), respectively. The patients treated with adjuvant ChT had higher rates of late serious GI complications than those without adjuvant ChT. No significant difference in terms of survival and disease control was observed between the 3DCRT and IMRT treatment groups. No significant factor for LC was found in the multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

In this multicentric study involving one of largest patient population, we found that IMRT-treated EC patients showed comparable clinical outcomes but with a lower incidence of GI toxicities compared with those treated with 3DCRT.

Comparison of 3D conformal radiation therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy in patients with endometrial cancer: efficacy, safety and prognostic analysis

Introduction: Adjuvant whole-pelvic radiation therapy (WPRT) improves locoregional control for high-intermediate stages I-III endometrial cancer patients. Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) tends to replace the standard 3D conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) technique used in trials. Material and methods: Consecutive patients with stages I-IIIc endometrial cancer treated between 2008 and 2014 in our department with post-operative 3DCRT or IMRT WPRT were studied retrospectively. Patients with cervical involvement underwent additional low-dose rate vaginal brachytherapy. The impact of the WPRT technique on local control, tolerance, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was assessed. Clinicians evaluated routinely acute radiation toxicity each week during radiation therapy and late toxicity during standard follow-up consultations. Results: Median follow-up was 50 months (range: 6-158). Among the 83 patients included, 47 were treated with 3DCRT and 36 with IMRT. There was no difference in patient characteristics between groups. The 5-year locoregional control and DFS rates were 94.5% and 68%, respectively. No significant difference was found between the 3DCRT and IMRT groups in terms of survival, with 5-year OS rates of 74.6% and 78%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, age over 68, stage > T1 and grade 3 were independently associated with shorter DFS and OS. Seven patients (8.4%) had grades 3-4 acute gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity with five patients (10.6%) and two (5.4%) in the 3DCRT and IMRT groups, respectively (p = .69). One case (1.2%) of late grade 3 GI toxicity was observed treated in 3DCRT. Conclusions: IMRT seems to be a safe technique for the treatment of endometrial cancer with a trend towards decreased acute GI toxicities. Results of the phase 3 RTOG 1203 trial are needed to confirm these results.

Successful treatment of platinum refractory ovarian clear cell carcinoma with secondary cytoreductive surgery and implantable transponder placement to facilitate targeted volumetric arc radiation therapy

We describe a case of the first successful treatment of platinum refractory clear cell ovarian cancer with secondary cytoreductive surgery and placement of Calypso transponders to facilitate post-operative volumetric arc radiation therapy. In the setting of both primary and recurrent disease, patients with clear cell ovarian cancer are less responsive to standard chemotherapy and those treated with radiation therapy may have improved outcomes compared to the use of other treatment modalities. Volumetric arc radiation therapy with implantable transponders is feasible, and allows for the targeted treatment of sites of metastatic disease while limiting toxicity to surrounding structures and can be considered for patients with recurrent ovarian cancer and oligometastatic disease.

•

Post-operative VMAT is feasible for patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.

•

VMAT minimizes toxicity and facilitates radiation therapy delivery.

•

Implantable transponders are a novel approach for targeted radiation therapy.

Image-guided radiation therapy for post-operative gynaecologic cancer: patient set up verification with and without implanted fiducial markers

BACKGROUND

Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is increasingly being used to treat gynaecological malignancies in the postoperative setting. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) with fiducial markers for daily localization.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A single institution study was performed of consecutive cervical or endometrial cancer patients receiving adjuvant external beam radiotherapy (n = 15). Patients were set up at treatment using daily CBCT and alignment of implanted fiducial markers. Image registration was retrospectively completed based on soft tissue matching and the resulting couch shifts from each IGRT method were compared (n = 122).

RESULTS

The median shift between IGRT methods was 2 mm, 1 mm and 1 mm in the anterior-posterior (A-P), superior-inferior (S-I), and lateral directions, respectively. The largest deviations were observed in the A-P direction; however, more than 90% were within 5 mm and 63.9% were within 2.5 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

IGRT based on soft tissue match provides a noninvasive convenient method for daily localization and is accurate within treatment uncertainty for the majority of cases.

[Clinical trials and perspectives of radiotherapy for uterine endometrial cancers]

The adjuvant management of uterine endometrial cancer has been studied in many randomized trials, leading to define postoperative therapeutic indications, depending on the risk factors for relapse, and on the expected benefit in terms of locoregional control and survival. The potential toxicity of treatments should be also considered. We review the available literature that yielded to guidelines that were recently published, on behalf of European societies, and we highlight the perspectives on ongoing studies, aimed at better defining the place and type of adjuvant treatment.

Vaginal cuff brachytherapy in endometrial cancer - a technically easy treatment?

Endometrial cancer (EC) is one of the most common gynecological cancers among women in the developed countries. Vaginal cuff is the main location of relapses after a curative surgical procedure and postoperative radiation therapy have proven to diminish it. Nevertheless, these results have not translated into better survival results. The preeminent place of vaginal cuff brachytherapy (VCB) in the postoperative treatment of high- to intermediate-risk EC was given by the PORTEC-2 trial, which demonstrated a similar reduction in relapses with VCB than with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), but VCB induced less late toxicity. As a result of this trial, the use of VCB has increased in clinical practice at the expense of EBRT. A majority of the clinical reviews of VCB usually address the risk categories and patient selection but pay little attention to technical aspects of the VCB procedure. Our review aimed to address both aspects. First of all, we described the risk groups, which guide patient selection for VCB in clinical practice. Then, we depicted several technical aspects that might influence dose deposition and toxicity. Bladder distension and rectal distension as well as applicator position or patient position are some of those variables that we reviewed.

Patterns of care of IMRT usage in postoperative management of uterine cancer

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the patterns of care regarding intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) usage in the postoperative management of uterine cancer.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was queried to identify women with endometrial adenocarcinoma who underwent hysterectomy followed by external beam radiation between 2004-2012. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze IMRT usage with comparison via the Chi Square test. Overall survival was also compared between IMRT and three dimensional conformal radiation therapy. Multivariable logistic regression and multivariable Cox Regression were used to identify covariables that impact IMRT usage and improved survival respectively.

RESULTS

7839 women were included in this study. IMRT utilization increased from 1.9% in 2004 to 32.4% in 2012 (p<0.001). The adjusted odds ratio (OR) for IMRT in 2012 compared with 2004 was 24.90, 95% CI 15.24-40.67 (p<0.001). Aside from year, other predictors of IMRT usage on multivariate analysis were positive nodes, higher dose, private insurance and higher income. Black race was associated with lower IMRT usage compared to Whites with an OR of 0.60, 95% CI 0.44-0.81 (p=0.001). IMRT was not associated with significantly increased survival (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.73-1.01, p=0.06). Black race and positive nodes were associated with decreased survival within the group studied whereas private insurance and higher income were associated with improved survival.

CONCLUSIONS

In this hospital-based registry, IMRT has significantly increased in utilization for postoperative radiation in uterine cancer between 2004-2012 although not resulting in significantly improved survival. Socioeconomic and racial disparities exist in the allocation of IMRT usage.

Impact of postoperative intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) on the rate of bowel obstruction in gynecologic malignancy

OBJECTIVE

The purpose was to determine the potential impact of IMRT on the rate of bowel obstruction (BO), in patients with gynecologic malignancies undergoing postoperative pelvic RT.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of all patients with endometrial or cervical cancer who received postoperative pelvic RT at our institution from 2000 to 2012. Patients who received definitive or palliative RT, or those with BO due to disease progression, were excluded. Standard two-sided statistical tests were used to evaluate for associated risk factors. Kaplan-Meier, Log rank and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis tests were performed for actuarial analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 224 patients were identified, 120 (54%) received postoperative pelvic IMRT and 104 (46%) 3-dimentional (3-D) RT. Median follow-up time was 67months. BO was grade 1 (asymptomatic) in 2/228 (0.9%), grade 2 (conservative management) in 4 (1.8%), and grade 3≥ in 4 (1.8%). Overall, the 5-year actuarial rate of BO was 4.8%. The 5-year rate of BO in the IMRT group was 0.9% compared to 9.3% for 3-D RT (p=0.006). Patients with BMI≥30kg/m(2) were less likely to develop BO (2.6% vs. 8.3; p=0.03). On multivariate analysis, only IMRT retained its significance as an independent predictor of less BO (p=0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of postoperative IMRT for cervical and endometrial cancer was associated with significant reduction in the rate of bowel obstruction. This difference maintained its statistical significance on multivariate analysis. Such finding if confirmed by others will help further solidify the benefit of IMRT in gynecologic cancers.

Long-term outcomes using adjuvant pelvic intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for endometrial carcinoma

PURPOSE

We evaluated the long-term outcome and toxicity of adjuvant intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for high-risk endometrial carcinoma via a retrospective institutional review of patients treated in this setting with extended follow-up.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with endometrial cancer who underwent comprehensive surgical staging followed by adjuvant IMRT with or without sequential chemotherapy between 1999 and 2010 were reviewed. Median doses delivered with IMRT and brachytherapy were 45 Gy in 25 fractions and 10 Gy in 2 fractions; 10.2% received extended field and 94.5% received vaginal brachytherapy. Kaplan-Meier estimates are provided for rates of locoregional (in-field) relapse, distant metastasis, and disease-free survival, and overall survival. Gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity reported were graded with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.03.

RESULTS

A total of 128 patients were identified. Median age at diagnosis was 64 years. Most patients (82.8%) had endometrioid adenocarcinoma followed by papillary serous (10.2%), clear cell (4.7%), and carcinosarcoma (2.3%). International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging distribution was as follows: IA, 13.3%; IB, 32.8%; II, 30.4%; IIIA, 5.5%; IIIC1, 9.4%; and IIIC2, 8.6%. Most (85.9%) underwent nodal dissections (28.1% pelvic only and 57.8% pelvic and para-aortic). Two patients (1.6%) experienced acute grade 3 GI toxicity; no other acute grade ≥3 GI/GU toxicities were noted. With a median follow-up of 57.0 months, 5-year locoregional relapse was 2.5%: vagina (n = 3), parametrium (n = 1), pelvic node (n = 1). Five-year estimates of distant metastasis, disease-free survival, and overall survival were 16.5%, 73.4%, and 77.4%, respectively. Five-year actuarial rates of late grade 3 GI and GU toxicities were 3.2% and 0.0%. The 5-year rate of symptomatic pelvic insufficiency fracture was 4.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

This study represents the largest cohort of endometrial cancer patients with extended follow-up receiving adjuvant IMRT. High rates of pelvic disease control and limited late toxicities demonstrate safety and efficacy of this approach in the setting of extended follow-up.

Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Versus 3D Conformal Radiotherapy for Postoperative Gynecologic Cancer: Are They Covering the Same Planning Target Volume?

Background and Purpose: This study compares dosimetric parameters of planning target volume (PTV) coverage and organs at risk (OAR) sparing when postoperative radiotherapy for gynecologic cancers is delivered using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) versus a four-field (4FLD) box technique.

Material and Methods: From July to December 2012, women requiring postoperative radiation for gynecologic cancers were treated with a standardized VMAT protocol. Two sets of optimized 4FLD plans were retrospectively generated: one based on standard anatomical borders (4FLD) and one based on the clinical target volume (CTV) created for VMAT with a 2 cm expansion guiding field border placement (4FLD+2). Ninety-five percent isodose curves were generated to evaluate PTV coverage.

Results: VMAT significantly improved dose conformity compared with 4FLD and 4FLD+2 plans (p < 0.001) and provided additional coverage of the PTV posteriorly and superiorly, corresponding to coverage of the presacral and proximal iliac vessels. There was a significant reduction in dose to all OARs with VMAT, including a 58% reduction in the volume of the small bowel receiving more than 45 Gy (p=0.005).

Conclusions: Despite treating a larger volume, radiotherapy using a 4FLD technique is less homogenous and provides inferior coverage of the PTV compared with VMAT. With meticulous treatment planning and delivery, VMAT effectively encompasses the PTV and minimizes dose to OARs.

Para-aortic and pelvic extended-field radiotherapy for advanced-stage uterine cancer: dosimetric and toxicity comparison between the four-field box and intensity-modulated techniques

BACKGROUND

In patients with advanced-stage endometrial carcinoma (eca), extended-field radiotherapy (efrt) is traditionally delivered by the 3-dimensional conformal (3d-crt) 4-field box technique. In recent years, the use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (imrt) in gynecologic cancers has increased. We compared the delivery of efrt by the 3d-crt and contemporary imrt techniques.

METHODS

After surgical staging and adjuvant chemotherapy in 38 eca patients, efrt was delivered by either imrt or 3d-crt. Doses to the organs at risk, side effects, and outcomes were compared between the techniques.

RESULTS

Of the 38 eca patients, 33 were stage iiic, and 5 were stage ivb. In the imrt group, maximal doses to rectum, small intestine, and bladder were significantly higher, and mean dose to bladder was lower (p < 0.0001). Most acute gastrointestinal, genitourinary, and hematologic side effects were grade i or ii and were comparable between the groups. In long-term follow-up, only grade 1 cystitis at 3 months was statistically higher in the imrt patients. No grade iii or iv gastrointestinal or genitourinary toxicities were observed. No statistically significant differences in overall and disease-free survival or recurrence rates were observed between the techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

In advanced eca patients, imrt is a safe and effective technique for delivering efrt to the pelvis and para-aortic region, and it is comparable to the 3d-crt 4-field box technique in both side effects and efficacy. For centres in which imrt is not readily available, 3d-crt is a valid alternative.

An analysis of appropriate delivery of postoperative radiation therapy for endometrial cancer using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method: Executive summary

PURPOSE

To summarize the results of American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO)'s analysis of appropriate delivery of postoperative radiation therapy (RT) for endometrial cancer using the RAND/University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Appropriateness Method, outline areas of convergence and divergence with the 2014 ASTRO endometrial Guideline, and highlight where this analysis provides new information or perspective.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method was used to combine available evidence with expert opinion. A comprehensive literature review was conducted and a multidisciplinary panel rated the appropriateness of RT options for different clinical scenarios. Treatments were categorized by the median rating as Appropriate, Uncertain, or Inappropriate.

RESULTS

The ASTRO endometrial Guideline and this analysis using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method did not recommend adjuvant RT for early-stage, low-risk endometrioid cancers and largely agree regarding use of vaginal brachytherapy for low-intermediate and high-intermediate risk patients. For more advanced endometrioid cancer, chemotherapy with RT is supported by both documents. The Guideline and the RAND/UCLA analysis diverged regarding use of pelvic radiation. For stages II and III, this analysis rated external beam RT plus vaginal brachytherapy Appropriate, whereas the Guideline preferred external beam alone. In addition, this analysis offers insight on the role of histology, extent of nodal dissection, and para-aortic nodal irradiation; the use of intensity modulated RT; and management of stage IVA.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis based on the RAND/UCLA Method shows significant agreement with the 2014 endometrial Guideline. Areas of divergence, often in scenarios with low-level evidence, included use of external beam RT plus vaginal brachytherapy in stages II and III and external beam RT alone in early-stage patients. Furthermore, the analysis explores other important questions regarding management of this disease site.

Safety of adjuvant intensity-modulated postoperative radiation therapy in endometrial cancer: Clinical data and dosimetric parameters according to the International Commission on Radiation Units (ICRU) 83 report

AIM

To report a single-institution experience using postoperative pelvic Intensity Modulation Radiation Therapy (IMRT) using tomotherapy accelerators (TA) in postoperative endometrial cancer (EC) regarding ICRU 83 recommendations.

BACKGROUND

IMRT in gynecological malignancies provides excellent dosimetric data, lower rates of adverse events and clinical data similar to historical series.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Seventy-six patients with EC were postoperatively treated with adjuvant IMRT using TA. The IMRT dose was 45 Gy for patients without positive lymph nodes and Type I histology and 50.4 Gy for patients with positive lymph nodes and/or type II histology.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 29 months, the 12- and 24-month Overall Survival (OS) and Disease-Free Survival (DFS) were 96%, 93%, 87%, and 74%, respectively. Age of less than 60 years was associated with better OS (HR: 8.9; CI: 1.1-68) and DFS (HR: 3.5; CI: 1.2-10.2). Patients with Type II and Type I Grade III histology had a worse OS (HR: 3.3; CI: 1.1-11). Five women (6.6%) presented in-field local vaginal recurrence, 2 (2.6%) presented non-in-field vaginal recurrence, 4 (5.2%) presented pelvic node and distant recurrence and 11 (14.4%) presented only distant metastases. One patient stopped radiation treatment due to Grade III acute diarrhea. No Grade III late toxicity was observed. Planning Target Volume (PTV) coverage showed mean D2, D50, D95, and D98 of 51.64-46.23 Gy, 49.49-44.97 Gy, 48.62-43.96 Gy, and 48.47-43.58 Gy for patients who received 45 and 50.4 Gy, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

IMRT with TA in postoperative EC shows excellent conformity and homogeneity of PTV dose. Without Grade III late toxicity, data from this cohort demonstrated the utility of IMRT.

Whole pelvic intensity-modulated radiotherapy for gynecological malignancies: A review of the literature

Radiation therapy has long played a major role in the treatment of gynecological malignancies. There is increasing interest in the utility of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and its application to treat gynecological malignancies. Herein, we review the state-of-the-art use of IMRT for gynecological malignancies and report how it is being used alone as well as in combination with chemotherapy in both the adjuvant and definitive settings. Based on dosimetric and clinical evidence, IMRT can reduce gastrointestinal, genitourinary, and hematological toxicities compared with 3D-conformal radiotherapy for gynecologic malignancies. We discuss how these attributes of IMRT may lead to improvements in disease outcomes by allowing for dose escalation of radiation therapy, intensification of chemotherapy, and limiting toxicity-related treatment breaks. Currently accruing trials investigating pelvic IMRT for cervical and endometrial cancers are discussed.

[Evidence based medicine and high performance irradiation techniques: endometrial cancer]

Radiation oncology is a field in which many technologic improvements have been made over the past decades. External beam radiotherapy has evolved from treatment fields planned on X-rays to 3-dimensional planning with fusion with MRI's and PET images. Recently, intensity-modulated radiotherapy has been tested for many cancer localizations, and its role in the treatment of gynecologic cancers is still under evaluation. Potential benefits are well known: decrease of treatment toxicity, improvement of efficacy through better dose delivery. But the implementation of this technique requires a careful target and organs at risk delineation. The goal of this review is to evaluate the use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy in endometrial cancers with respect of dosimetric and clinical studies to date. In addition, challenges and perspectives of intensity-modulated radiotherapy integration are discussed.

Comparison of outcomes in early stage uterine carcinosarcoma and uterine serous carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether contemporary adjuvant management of early stage uterine carcinosarcoma (CS) produces equal outcomes as in uterine serous carcinoma (USC).

METHODS

We reviewed 172 women treated from 2000 to 2011 for stage I-II USC (n=112, 65%) or CS (n=60, 35%). Adjuvant therapy was initiated in 154 (90%) patients, with 111 patients receiving intravaginal radiotherapy (IVRT)/chemotherapy. Median follow up was 4.6 years for surviving patients.

RESULTS

Characteristics for USC vs. CS did not differ significantly by age ≥60, pelvic or para-aortic node sampling, stage, lymphovascular invasion, chemotherapy use, RT use or omission of adjuvant therapy. Outcomes were better for USC vs. CS in 5-year actuarial rates of recurrence [17% (C.I. 10-25%) vs. 45% (C.I. 31-59%), p<0.001],disease-related mortality (DRM) [11% (5-17%) vs. 30% (16-44%), p=0.016], and all-cause mortality [12% (C.I. 6-18%) vs. 34% (C.I. 20-48%), p=0.007]. In multivariable analysis, CS histology remained a significant predictor of risk for recurrence [HR 3.1 (C.I. 1.7-5.7), p<0.001], DRM [HR 2.4 (C.I. 1.1-5.1), p=0.024], and all-cause mortality [HR 2.4 (C.I. 1.2-4.8), p=0.012]. On sub-group analysis of 111 patients (77 USC, 34 CS) able to receive IVRT/chemotherapy, CS no longer was associated significantly with increased recurrence (29% vs. 15%, p=0.18), DRM (22% vs. 10%, p=0.39), or all-cause mortality (22% vs. 10%, p=0.45).

CONCLUSIONS

CS was associated with worse outcomes than USC. However, that difference was not maintained in patients able to receive IVRT and chemotherapy. While intriguing, this result may be due in part to selection against rapid early relapsing CS patients in this group.

Radiation treatment in older patients: a framework for clinical decision making

In older patients, radiation treatment plays a vital role in curative and palliative cancer therapy. Radiation treatment recommendations should be informed by a comprehensive, personalized risk-benefit assessment that evaluates treatment efficacy and toxicity. We review several clinical factors that distinctly affect efficacy and toxicity of radiation treatment in older patients. First, locoregional tumor behavior may be more indolent in older patients for some disease sites but more aggressive for other sites. Assessment of expected locoregional relapse risk informs the magnitude and timeframe of expected radiation treatment benefits. Second, assessment of the competing cancer versus noncancer mortality and morbidity risks contextualizes cancer treatment priorities holistically within patients' entire spectrum and time course of health needs. Third, assessment of functional reserve helps predict patients' acute treatment tolerance, differentiating those patients who are unlikely to benefit from treatment or who are at high risk for treatment complications. Potential radiation treatment options include immediate curative treatment, delayed curative treatment, and no treatment, with additional consideration given to altered radiation target, dose, or sequencing with chemotherapy and/or surgery. Finally, when cure is not feasible, palliative radiation therapy remains valuable for managing symptoms and achieving meaningful quality-of-life improvements. Our proposed decision-making framework integrates these factors to help radiation oncologists formulate strategic treatment recommendations within a multidisciplinary context. Future research is still needed to identify how advanced technologies can be judiciously applied in curative and palliative settings to enhance risk-benefit profiles of radiation treatment in older patients and more accurately quantify treatment efficacy in this group.

Concomitant chemotherapy and radiation for the treatment of advanced-stage endometrial cancer

INTRODUCTION

Ccombination chemotherapy and radiation therapy is used for adjuvant treatment of stage III-IV endometrial cancer. The goal of this study was to review the treatment duration, toxicity, and survival for patients treated with concomitant chemotherapy and radiation.

METHODS

Women with stage III-IV endometrial cancer treated with concurrent chemotherapy and radiation between 2006 and 2013 were included. Toxicities were classified per CTCAE v3.0 and RTOG/EORTC late radiation morbidity scoring. Descriptive statistics were used to quantify treatment and toxicities. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients met our inclusion criteria. Median age was 60 (range 33-85). Thirty-six patients (70.6%) had endometrioid histology, 13 patients (25.5%) had serous, clear cell, or mixed histology, and 2 women (3.9%) had carcinosarcoma. Forty-eight patients had stage III disease and three patients were stage IVB. Mean treatment duration was 107 ± 19 days. Forty-two patients received all planned chemotherapy, and 16 patients required a dose reduction. Thirty-four patients (66.7%) experienced grade 3-4 toxicities, the majority of which were hematologic. There were no deaths related to therapy. Eighty-six percent of patients received leukocyte growth factors, and 25% of patients received a blood transfusion. Seven late grade 3-4 complications occurred: four gastrointestinal and two genitourinary, and one patient had ongoing neuropathy. Median progression-free survival was 42.8 months (range 4.4-81.5 months) and median overall survival was 44.9 months (range 5.1-82.6 months). Three-year overall survival was 80%.

CONCLUSION

Concomitant chemotherapy and radiation is an adequately tolerated treatment modality that allows for shorter treatment duration.

Postradiation Damage to the Pelvic Girdle in Cervical Cancer Patients: Is Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Safer Than Conventional Radiation?

Objectives

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is frequently utilized in the treatment of cervical cancer. Our study compared instances of pelvic fractures, osteonecrosis, and osteomyelitis posttreatment with conventional radiation therapy (RT) versus IMRT in patients with cervical carcinomas.

Methods

Eighty-three patients primarily treated with IMRT were case matched with 83 historical control subjects treated with conventional RT. Pretreatment and posttreatment computed tomography scans were reviewed. Logistic regression analysis was utilized to examine the effects of treatment type (conventional RT vs IMRT) on the occurrence of posttreatment pelvic bony structure complications while adjusting for confounders.

Results

In the IMRT group, 3 (4%) of 83 patients developed posttreatment sacral fractures (median follow-up, 51 months). In the conventional RT group, there were 14 pelvic girdle complications (17%): 9 fractures, 2 cases of osteonecrosis, and 3 cases of osteomyelitis (median follow-up, 43.5 months; odds ratio, 4.49 for conventional vs IMRT groups,P= 0.01; 95% confidence interval, 1.4–14.1). In addition, there were 4 cases of posttreatment osteoporosis in the conventional RT group. All patients with complications in the IMRT group and 11 of 13 in the conventional RT group were symptomatic.

Conclusions

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy is associated with a lower risk for pelvic girdle complications than conventional RT.

Adjuvant volumetric-modulated arc therapy with simultaneous integrated boost in endometrial cancer. Planning and toxicity comparison

OBJECTIVE

To report dosimetric and acute toxicity data in prospectively enrolled high-intermediate risk endometrial cancer (HIR-EC) patients postoperatively irradiated by simultaneous integrated boost volumetric modulated arc therapy (SIB-VMAT).

METHODS

Thirty prospectively enrolled HIR-EC patients were postoperatively treated by SIB-VMAT. Target coverage, dose homogeneity, and sparing of organs at risk (OARs) were compared with corresponding data retrieved from an historical control (30 consecutive selected matched patients) treated by concomitant boost three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D CRT CB) from a previously published study (ADA-I trial). All patients received 45 Gy on pelvic lymph nodes plus 10 Gy boost on the vaginal vault.

RESULTS

The SIB-VMAT technique produced more inhomogeneous plans than 3D CRT CB, but showed significantly better conformity index (CIs) for both PTVs. SIB-VMAT was associated with significant reduction in the irradiated small bowel (SB) volume compared with 3D CRT CB for all dose range > 10 Gy (e.g. V15: 163.5 cm(3) vs. 341.3 cm(3), p = 0.001 and V40: 43.8 cm(3) vs. 85.2 cm(3), p = 0.008). With regard to bladder and rectum, SIB-VMAT showed a significant sparing advantage at all dose levels with respect to 3D CRT CB retrieved plans. Moreover, overall OARs Dmean were significantly reduced by the SIB-VMAT (p = 0.001). According to CTCAE v.4.0, acute (within three months) GI toxicities were more frequent in 3D CRT CB versus SIB-VMAT (90.0% vs. 66.7%; p-value 0.028).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to data from a historical database of patients administered 3D CRT CB, SIB-VMAT significantly improves the dose conformity and sparing of OARs in HIR-EC patients undergoing postoperative radiotherapy. The improvement in terms of acute toxicity justifies further prospective clinical evaluation.

Intensity modulated radiotherapy in gynecologic cancers: hope, hype or hyperbole?

Significant advances have occurred within the field of radiation oncology within the past few decades. Treatment with external beam radiotherapy has progressed from treatment fields planned from bony anatomy seen on planar X-rays, to 3-dimensional planning utilizing fused MRI's and PET images. Recently, intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) has been integrated into many areas within radiation oncology, and its role in the treatment of gynecologic cancers is evolving. Potentials exist for improvements in both treatment toxicity, as well as improved efficacy through advances in treatment delivery. Unique challenges are also raised, however. With increased accuracy of treatment delivery comes the need for greater accuracy in target delineation and incorporation of motion to prevent marginal misses. The goal of this review is to evaluate the use of IMRT in cervical and endometrial cancers, including the results of dosimetric and clinical studies to date. In addition, potential disadvantages and challenges of IMRT integration are discussed.