1
|
Snowsill TM, Coelho H, Morrish NG, Briscoe S, Boddy K, Smith T, Crosbie EJ, Ryan NA, Lalloo F, Hulme CT. Gynaecological cancer surveillance for women with Lynch syndrome: systematic review and cost-effectiveness evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2024; 28:1-228. [PMID: 39246007 PMCID: PMC11403379 DOI: 10.3310/vbxx6307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Lynch syndrome is an inherited condition which leads to an increased risk of colorectal, endometrial and ovarian cancer. Risk-reducing surgery is generally recommended to manage the risk of gynaecological cancer once childbearing is completed. The value of gynaecological colonoscopic surveillance as an interim measure or instead of risk-reducing surgery is uncertain. We aimed to determine whether gynaecological surveillance was effective and cost-effective in Lynch syndrome. Methods We conducted systematic reviews of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of gynaecological cancer surveillance in Lynch syndrome, as well as a systematic review of health utility values relating to cancer and gynaecological risk reduction. Study identification included bibliographic database searching and citation chasing (searches updated 3 August 2021). Screening and assessment of eligibility for inclusion were conducted by independent researchers. Outcomes were prespecified and were informed by clinical experts and patient involvement. Data extraction and quality appraisal were conducted and results were synthesised narratively. We also developed a whole-disease economic model for Lynch syndrome using discrete event simulation methodology, including natural history components for colorectal, endometrial and ovarian cancer, and we used this model to conduct a cost-utility analysis of gynaecological risk management strategies, including surveillance, risk-reducing surgery and doing nothing. Results We found 30 studies in the review of clinical effectiveness, of which 20 were non-comparative (single-arm) studies. There were no high-quality studies providing precise outcome estimates at low risk of bias. There is some evidence that mortality rate is higher for surveillance than for risk-reducing surgery but mortality is also higher for no surveillance than for surveillance. Some asymptomatic cancers were detected through surveillance but some cancers were also missed. There was a wide range of pain experiences, including some individuals feeling no pain and some feeling severe pain. The use of pain relief (e.g. ibuprofen) was common, and some women underwent general anaesthetic for surveillance. Existing economic evaluations clearly found that risk-reducing surgery leads to the best lifetime health (measured using quality-adjusted life-years) and is cost-effective, while surveillance is not cost-effective in comparison. Our economic evaluation found that a strategy of surveillance alone or offering surveillance and risk-reducing surgery was cost-effective, except for path_PMS2 Lynch syndrome. Offering only risk-reducing surgery was less effective than offering surveillance with or without surgery. Limitations Firm conclusions about clinical effectiveness could not be reached because of the lack of high-quality research. We did not assume that women would immediately take up risk-reducing surgery if offered, and it is possible that risk-reducing surgery would be more effective and cost-effective if it was taken up when offered. Conclusions There is insufficient evidence to recommend for or against gynaecological cancer surveillance in Lynch syndrome on clinical grounds, but modelling suggests that surveillance could be cost-effective. Further research is needed but it must be rigorously designed and well reported to be of benefit. Study registration This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42020171098. Funding This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR129713) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 41. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Helen Coelho
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Nia G Morrish
- Health Economics Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Simon Briscoe
- Exeter Policy Research Programme Evidence Review Facility, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Kate Boddy
- NIHR Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care South West Peninsula, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | | | - Emma J Crosbie
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Neil Aj Ryan
- The Academic Women's Health Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St Michael's Hospital, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Fiona Lalloo
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Claire T Hulme
- Health Economics Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Underkofler KA, Ring KL. Updates in gynecologic care for individuals with lynch syndrome. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1127683. [PMID: 36937421 PMCID: PMC10014618 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1127683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Accepted: 02/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Lynch syndrome is an autosomal dominant hereditary cancer syndrome caused by germline pathogenic variants (PVs) in DNA mismatch repair genes (MLH1, MSH2, PMS2, MSH6) or the EPCAM gene. It is estimated to affect 1 in 300 individuals and confers a lifetime risk of cancer of 10-90%, depending on the specific variant and type of cancer. Lynch syndrome is the most common cause of inherited colorectal cancer, but for women, endometrial cancer is more likely to be the sentinel cancer. There is also evidence that certain PVs causing Lynch syndrome confer an increased risk of ovarian cancer, while the risk of ovarian cancer in others is not well defined. Given this, it is essential for the practicing gynecologist and gynecologic oncologist to remain up to date on the latest techniques in identification and diagnosis of individuals with Lynch syndrome as well as evidence-based screening and risk reduction recommendations for those impacted. Furthermore, as the landscape of gynecologic cancer treatment shifts towards treatment based on molecular classification of tumors, knowledge of targeted therapies well-suited for mismatch repair deficient Lynch tumors will be crucial. The objective of this review is to highlight recent updates in the literature regarding identification and management of individuals with Lynch syndrome as it pertains to endometrial and ovarian cancers to allow gynecologic providers the opportunity to both prevent and identify Lynch-associated cancers earlier, thereby reducing the morbidity and mortality of the syndrome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kari L. Ring
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Heames L, Williamson IR, Song J, Lond B. Living in the shadow of Lynch Syndrome: British women's accounts. Health Care Women Int 2022:1-23. [PMID: 35904976 DOI: 10.1080/07399332.2022.2101652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2020] [Revised: 07/08/2022] [Accepted: 07/10/2022] [Indexed: 10/16/2022]
Abstract
In this paper we explore accounts of eight British women living with Lynch Syndrome: a hereditary syndrome that increases the risk of developing bowel and gynecological cancers. We collected data via semi-structured interviews and analyzed them using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. Two themes, 'It's Up to Us': The Lynch Patient Experience; and 'The Biggest Challenge': The Lynch Parent Experience, illustrate the experiential burden and emotional labor of living with Lynch Syndrome. We theorize our analysis through Corbin and Strauss's concept of 'Health Work', and Hochschild's concept of 'Emotion Work'. Recommendations for clinical care and familial support are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren Heames
- Psychology Division, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK
| | | | - John Song
- Psychology Division, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK
| | - Benjamin Lond
- Psychology Division, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mittendorf KF, Knerr S, Kauffman TL, Lindberg NM, Anderson KP, Feigelson HS, Gilmore MJ, Hunter JE, Joseph G, Kraft SA, Zepp JM, Syngal S, Wilfond BS, Goddard KAB. Systemic Barriers to Risk-Reducing Interventions for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes: Implications for Health Care Inequities. JCO Precis Oncol 2021; 5:PO.21.00233. [PMID: 34778694 PMCID: PMC8585306 DOI: 10.1200/po.21.00233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2021] [Revised: 09/21/2021] [Accepted: 09/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Kathleen F. Mittendorf
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR
| | - Sarah Knerr
- School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Tia L. Kauffman
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR
| | - Nangel M. Lindberg
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR
| | | | | | - Marian J. Gilmore
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR
| | - Jessica Ezzell Hunter
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR
| | - Galen Joseph
- Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA
| | - Stephanie A. Kraft
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute, Seattle, WA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Jamilyn M. Zepp
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR
| | - Sapna Syngal
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Benjamin S. Wilfond
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute, Seattle, WA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Katrina A. B. Goddard
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mukucha KE, Manase MT, Muronda C, Whittaker J, Guzha BT. Challenges managing women with suspected Lynch Syndrome in Zimbabwe: a case report. SOUTHERN AFRICAN JOURNAL OF GYNAECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY 2021. [DOI: 10.1080/20742835.2021.1991100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Kotti-Emily Mukucha
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Marshall T Manase
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | | | | | - Bothwell T Guzha
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Woolderink JM, De Bock GH, van Hemel BM, Geuken E, Hollema H, Werner N, Mourits MJ. Feasibility of endometrial sampling by vaginal tampons in women with Lynch syndrome. BMC WOMENS HEALTH 2020; 20:54. [PMID: 32183830 PMCID: PMC7079431 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-020-00920-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2019] [Accepted: 03/06/2020] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Background Endometrial sampling for the surveillance of women with Lynch syndrome is an invasive and painful procedure. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a less invasive procedure of collecting vital cells by vaginal tampons. Methods This was a prospective feasibility study of women scheduled to undergo annual gynecological surveillance, including endometrial sampling. We included consecutive asymptomatic women with Lynch syndrome or first-degree relatives and asked them to insert a vaginal tampon 2–4 h before attending their outpatient appointment. Feasibility was evaluated by the following metrics: patient acceptance, pain intensity of each procedure (assessed by visual analog scale; range 0–10), and the presence of vital cells obtained by tampon-based or endometrial sampling methods. Two pathologists independently evaluated all samples. Results In total, 25 of 32 approached women completed the tampon-based procedure, with 23 of these subsequently undergoing invasive endometrial sampling. The median visual analog scale scores for tampon use and invasive endometrial sampling were 0 (range, 0–10) and 5.5 (range, 1–10) (p < 0.001). None of the tampon samples analyzed by cytology showed endometrial cells, but they did contain vital squamous cells and granulocytes. By contrast, 18 (78%) of the invasive endometrial samples contained enough endometrial tissue for analysis. No endometrial abnormalities were found by endometrial sampling. Conclusions Tampon-based endometrial surveillance was a well-accepted and non-painful procedure, and although tampons contained vital cells, they did not provide endometrial cells. However, this study was limited to asymptomatic women with Lynch syndrome (no endometrial pathology), indicating that research is needed to evaluate whether the tampon method has any utility for endometrial surveillance in women with Lynch syndrome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorien M Woolderink
- Department of Gynecology, Martini Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands. .,Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700, RB, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | - Geertruida H De Bock
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Bettien M van Hemel
- Department of Pathology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Erwin Geuken
- Department of Pathology, Martini Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Harry Hollema
- Department of Pathology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Naomi Werner
- Department of Pathology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Marian J Mourits
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700, RB, Groningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sun CC, Meyer LA, Daniels MS, Bodurka DC, Nebgen DR, Burton-Chase AM, Lu KH, Peterson SK. Women's preferences for cancer risk management strategies in Lynch syndrome. Gynecol Oncol 2019; 152:514-521. [PMID: 30876497 PMCID: PMC6422049 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.11.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2018] [Revised: 11/14/2018] [Accepted: 11/16/2018] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We assessed preferences for cancer risk management strategies for Lynch syndrome (LS) in LS-affected women. METHODS Women with LS aged ≥25 years evaluated 9 cancer risk management strategies using a visual analog scale (VAS) and modified standard gamble (SG). For the VAS, women ranked each strategy ranging from 0 (least preferred) to 100 (most preferred). VAS scores were calculated by dividing the corresponding number by 100. Scores closer to 1.0 reflected more favorable strategies. For the SG, participants were asked to specify their expected threshold of lifetime risk of endometrial or colorectal cancer, ranging from 0 to 100%, at which they would consider undertaking each strategy. Strategies included chemoprevention, cancer screening, and preventive surgery. Cancer worry and perceived cancer risk measures were collected on a subset of participants. RESULTS Sixty-one women completed preference assessments. By VAS, annual combined screening was the most preferred, followed by annual screenings and chemoprevention with oral contraceptives. By SG, women were the most willing to endorse oral contraceptives and biannual screening strategies at the lowest threshold of lifetime risk followed by annual screening strategies. Surgical interventions were the least preferred strategies using both VAS and SG. Women with a family history of gynecologic or colorectal cancer were less likely to consider prevention or screening options compared to women without a family history. Cancer worry was higher among women with a positive family history of LS cancer. CONCLUSION Understanding women's preferences may facilitate optimal use and adherence to cancer risk management strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte C Sun
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, Houston, TX, United States of America.
| | - Larissa A Meyer
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Molly S Daniels
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Clinical Cancer Genetics, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Diane C Bodurka
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Denise R Nebgen
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Allison M Burton-Chase
- Department of Basic and Social Sciences, Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Albany, NY, United States of America
| | - Karen H Lu
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Susan K Peterson
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Behavioral Sciences, Houston, TX, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Helder-Woolderink J, de Bock G, Hollema H, van Oven M, Mourits M. Pain evaluation during gynaecological surveillance in women with Lynch syndrome. Fam Cancer 2017; 16:205-210. [PMID: 27787750 PMCID: PMC5357504 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-016-9937-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
To evaluate perceived pain during repetitive annual endometrial sampling at gynaecologic surveillance in asymptomatic women with Lynch syndrome (LS) over time and in addition to symptomatic women without LS, undergoing single endometrial sampling. In this prospective study, 52 women with LS or first degree relatives who underwent repetitive annual gynaecological surveillance including endometrial sampling of which 33 were evaluated twice or more and 50 symptomatic women without LS who had single endometrial sampling, were included. Pain intensity was registered with VAS scores. Differences in pain intensities between subsequent visits (in LS) and between the two groups were evaluated. The use of painkillers before endometrial sampling was registered. If women with LS decided for preventive surgery, the reason was recorded. The LS group reported a median VAS score of 5.0 (range 0-10) at the first surveillance (n = 52) and at the second visit (n = 24). Women who repeatedly underwent endometrial sampling more often used painkillers for this procedure. During the study period 7/52 (13 %) women with LS choose for preventive surgery, another 4/52 (8 %) refused further endometrial sampling. Painful endometrial sampling was mentioned as main reason to quit screening. The median VAS score of the 50 symptomatic women was 5.0 (range 1-9). Endometrial sampling, irrespective of indication, is a painful procedure, with a median VAS score of 5.0. During subsequent procedures in women with LS, the median pain score does not aggravate although one in five women chose an alternative for endometrial sampling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorien Helder-Woolderink
- University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
- Martini Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Harry Hollema
- University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Marian Mourits
- University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Daniels MS, Lu KH. Genetic predisposition in gynecologic cancers. Semin Oncol 2016; 43:543-547. [DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2016.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2016] [Accepted: 08/10/2016] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
10
|
Rutgers JKL. Update on pathology, staging and molecular pathology of endometrial (uterine corpus) adenocarcinoma. Future Oncol 2015; 11:3207-18. [PMID: 26551559 DOI: 10.2217/fon.15.262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Endometrial carcinoma is comprised of two major groups: type I that is hormonally driven with a good prognosis and type II that is hormone independent with a poor prognosis. The two most common subtypes are endometrioid adenocarcinoma, the prototypic type I cancer, and uterine serous carcinoma, the prototypic type II cancer, each with their own distinct precursor lesion. The histologic type, as codified by the WHO Tumor Classification system, grade, and stage are used to guide treatment. There is an increasing interest in screening for familial risk factors, specifically Lynch syndrome. A molecular classification of endometrial cancers holds promise for future improvements in care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne K L Rutgers
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wong A, Ngeow J. Hereditary Syndromes Manifesting as Endometrial Carcinoma: How Can Pathological Features Aid Risk Assessment? BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2015; 2015:219012. [PMID: 26161390 PMCID: PMC4486295 DOI: 10.1155/2015/219012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2014] [Accepted: 11/23/2014] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Endometrial carcinoma is the most common gynecological tumor worldwide. It can be the presenting malignancy, acting as the harbinger, of an undiagnosed hereditary syndrome. Up to 50% of females with Lynch syndrome present in this manner. Differentiation between Lynch, Muir-Torre, and Cowden syndromes can at times be challenging due to the overlapping features. Our review emphasizes on the strengths, pitfalls, and limitations of microscopic features as well as immunohistochemical and polymerase chain reaction- (PCR-) based tests used by laboratories to screen for DNA mismatch repair (MMR) and PTEN gene mutations in patients to enable a more targeted and cost effective approach in the use of confirmatory gene mutational analysis tests. This is crucial towards initiating timely and appropriate surveillance measures for the patient and affected family members. We also review the evidence postulating on the possible inclusion of uterine serous carcinoma as part of the spectrum of malignancies seen in hereditary breast and ovarian carcinoma syndrome, driven by mutations in BRCA1/2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adele Wong
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore 229899
| | - Joanne Ngeow
- Cancer Genetics Service, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore 169610
- Oncology Academic Clinical Program, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore 169857
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Drive, Singapore 169610
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bikhchandani J, Lynch HT. Commentary on 'Colonoscopy screening compliance and outcomes in patients with Lynch syndrome'. Colorectal Dis 2015; 17:46-9. [PMID: 25536883 DOI: 10.1111/codi.12841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jai Bikhchandani
- Creighton University, 2500 California Plaza, Omaha, Nebraska, 68102, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|