1
|
Brooks N, Irving SA, Kauffman TL, Vesco KK, Slaughter M, Smith N, Tepper NK, Olson CK, Weintraub ES, Naleway AL. Abnormal uterine bleeding diagnoses and care following COVID-19 vaccination. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2024; 230:540.e1-540.e13. [PMID: 38219855 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Revised: 01/03/2024] [Accepted: 01/05/2024] [Indexed: 01/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is evidence suggesting that COVID-19 vaccination may be associated with small, transitory effects on uterine bleeding, possibly including menstrual timing, flow, and duration, in some individuals. However, changes in health care seeking, diagnosis, and workup for abnormal uterine bleeding in the COVID-19 vaccine era are less clear. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to assess the impact of COVID-19 vaccination on incident abnormal uterine bleeding diagnosis and diagnostic evaluation in a large integrated health system. STUDY DESIGN Using segmented regression, we assessed whether the availability of COVID-19 vaccines was associated with changes in monthly, population-based rates of incident abnormal uterine bleeding diagnoses relative to the prepandemic period in health system members aged 16 to 44 years who were not menopausal. We also compared clinical and demographic characteristics of patients diagnosed with incident abnormal uterine bleeding between December 2020 and October 13, 2021 by vaccination status (never vaccinated, vaccinated in the 60 days before diagnosis, vaccinated >60 days before diagnosis). Furthermore, we conducted detailed chart review of patients diagnosed with abnormal uterine bleeding within 1 to 60 days of COVID-19 vaccination in the same time period. RESULTS In monthly populations ranging from 79,000 to 85,000 female health system members, incidence of abnormal uterine bleeding diagnosis per 100,000 person-days ranged from 8.97 to 19.19. There was no significant change in the level or trend in the incidence of abnormal uterine bleeding diagnoses between the prepandemic (January 2019-January 2020) and post-COVID-19 vaccine (December 2020-December 2021) periods. A comparison of clinical characteristics of 2717 abnormal uterine bleeding cases by vaccination status suggested that abnormal bleeding among recently vaccinated patients was similar or less severe than abnormal bleeding among patients who had never been vaccinated or those vaccinated >60 days before. There were also significant differences in age and race of patients with incident abnormal uterine bleeding diagnoses by vaccination status (Ps<.02). Never-vaccinated patients were the youngest and those vaccinated >60 days before were the oldest. The proportion of patients who were Black/African American was highest among never-vaccinated patients, and the proportion of Asian patients was higher among vaccinated patients. Chart review of 114 confirmed postvaccination abnormal uterine bleeding cases diagnosed from December 2020 through October 13, 2021 found that the most common symptoms reported were changes in timing, duration, and volume of bleeding. Approximately one-third of cases received no diagnostic workup; 57% had no etiology for the bleeding documented in the electronic health record. In 12% of cases, the patient mentioned or asked about a possible link between their bleeding and their recent COVID-19 vaccine. CONCLUSION The availability of COVID-19 vaccination was not associated with a change in incidence of medically attended abnormal uterine bleeding in our population of over 79,000 female patients of reproductive age. In addition, among 2717 patients with abnormal uterine bleeding diagnoses in the period following COVID-19 vaccine availability, receipt of the vaccine was not associated with greater bleeding severity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neon Brooks
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR.
| | | | - Tia L Kauffman
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR
| | - Kimberly K Vesco
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR
| | | | - Ning Smith
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR
| | - Naomi K Tepper
- Division of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
| | - Christine K Olson
- Immunization Safety Office, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
| | - Eric S Weintraub
- Immunization Safety Office, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gilmore MJ, Leo MC, Amendola LM, Goddard KAB, Hunter JE, Joseph G, Kauffman TL, Rolf B, Shuster E, Zepp JM, Wilfond BS, Biesecker BB. Evaluation of mailed results versus telephone disclosure of normal cancer genetic test results in a low-risk underserved population. Transl Behav Med 2024:ibad084. [PMID: 38190737 DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibad084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Scalable models for result disclosure are needed to ensure large-scale access to genomics services. Research evaluating alternatives to genetic counseling suggests effectiveness; however, it is unknown whether these findings are generalizable across populations. We assessed whether a letter is non-inferior to telephone genetic counseling to inform participants with no personal or family history of cancer of their normal results. Data were collected via self-report surveys before and after result disclosure (at 1 and 6 months) in a study sample enriched for individuals from underserved populations. Primary outcomes were subjective understanding of results (global and aggregated) and test-related feelings, ascertained via three subscales (uncertainty, negative emotions, and positive feelings) of the Feelings About genomiC Testing Results (FACToR) measure. Secondary outcomes related to satisfaction with communication. Non-inferiority tests compared outcomes among disclosure methods. Communication by letter was inferior in terms of global subjective understanding of results (at 1 month) and non-inferior to telephoned results (at 6 months). Letter was non-inferior to telephone for aggregated understanding (at 6 months). Letter was superior (at 1 month) to telephone on the uncertainty FACToR subscale. Letter was non-inferior to telephone on the positive-feelings FACToR subscale (at 6 months). Letter was non-inferior to telephone for satisfaction with mode of result delivery and genetic test results. Communication via letter was inferior to telephone in communicating the "right amount of information." The use of written communication to relay normal results to low-risk individuals is a promising strategy that may improve the efficiency of care delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marian J Gilmore
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Michael C Leo
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
| | | | - Katrina A B Goddard
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Jessica Ezzell Hunter
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
- Genomics, Ethics, and Translational Research Program, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Galen Joseph
- Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Tia L Kauffman
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Bradley Rolf
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Jamilyn M Zepp
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Benjamin S Wilfond
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kauffman TL, Irving SA, Brooks N, Vesco KK, Slaughter M, Smith N, Tepper NK, Olson CK, Weintraub ES, Naleway AL. Postmenopausal bleeding after COVID-19 vaccination. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2024; 230:71.e1-71.e14. [PMID: 37726057 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Revised: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a growing literature base regarding menstrual changes following COVID-19 vaccination among premenopausal people. However, relatively little is known about uterine bleeding in postmenopausal people following COVID-19 vaccination. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to examine trends in incident postmenopausal bleeding diagnoses over time before and after COVID-19 vaccine introduction, and to describe cases of new-onset postmenopausal bleeding after COVID-19 vaccination. STUDY DESIGN For postmenopausal bleeding incidence calculations, monthly population-level cohorts consisted of female Kaiser Permanente Northwest members aged ≥45 years. Those diagnosed with incident postmenopausal bleeding in the electronic medical record were included in monthly numerators. Members with preexisting postmenopausal bleeding or abnormal uterine bleeding, or who were at increased risk of bleeding due to other health conditions, were excluded from monthly calculations. We used segmented regression analysis to estimate changes in the incidence of postmenopausal bleeding diagnoses from 2018 through 2021 in Kaiser Permanente Northwest members meeting the inclusion criteria, stratified by COVID-19 vaccination status in 2021. In addition, we identified all members with ≥1 COVID-19 vaccination between December 14, 2020 and August 14, 2021, who had an incident postmenopausal bleeding diagnosis within 60 days of vaccination. COVID-19 vaccination, diagnostic procedures, and presumed bleeding etiology were assessed through chart review and described. A temporal scan statistic was run on all cases without clear bleeding etiology. RESULTS In a population of 75,530 to 82,693 individuals per month, there was no statistically significant difference in the rate of incident postmenopausal bleeding diagnoses before and after COVID-19 vaccine introduction (P=.59). A total of 104 individuals had incident postmenopausal bleeding diagnosed within 60 days following COVID-19 vaccination; 76% of cases (79/104) were confirmed as postvaccination postmenopausal bleeding after chart review. Median time from vaccination to bleeding onset was 21 days (range: 2-54 days). Among the 56 postmenopausal bleeding cases with a provider-attributed etiology, the common causes of bleeding were uterine or cervical lesions (50% [28/56]), hormone replacement therapy (13% [7/56]), and proliferative endometrium (13% [7/56]). Among the 23 cases without a clear etiology, there was no statistically significant clustering of postmenopausal bleeding onset following vaccination. CONCLUSION Within this integrated health system, introduction of COVID-19 vaccines was not associated with an increase in incident postmenopausal bleeding diagnoses. Diagnosis of postmenopausal bleeding in the 60 days following receipt of a COVID-19 vaccination was rare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tia L Kauffman
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR
| | | | - Neon Brooks
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR
| | - Kimberly K Vesco
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR
| | | | - Ning Smith
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR
| | - Naomi K Tepper
- Division of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
| | - Christine K Olson
- Immunization Safety Office, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
| | - Eric S Weintraub
- Immunization Safety Office, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gilmore MJ, Knerr S, Kraft SA, Bulkley JE, Biesecker BB, Feigelson HS, Hunter JE, Jenkins CL, Kauffman TL, Lee SSJ, Liles EG, Mittendorf KF, Muessig KR, Porter KM, Rolf BA, Rope AF, Zepp JM, Anderson KP, Devine B, Joseph G, Leo MC, Goddard K, Wilfond BS. Improving Care for Marginalized Populations at Risk for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes: Innovations that Expanded Reach in the CHARM Study. Public Health Genomics 2023; 27:16-22. [PMID: 38142673 DOI: 10.1159/000535610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 11/17/2023] [Indexed: 12/26/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Marian J Gilmore
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA,
| | - Sarah Knerr
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Stephanie A Kraft
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics and Palliative Care, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Joanna E Bulkley
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | | | | | - Jessica Ezzell Hunter
- Genomics, Ethics, and Translational Research Program, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | - Charisma L Jenkins
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Tia L Kauffman
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Sandra Soo-Jin Lee
- Division of Ethics, Department of Medical Humanities and Ethics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Kathleen F Mittendorf
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Kristin R Muessig
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Kathryn M Porter
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics and Palliative Care, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Bradley A Rolf
- Department of Medicine (Medical Genetics), University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Alan F Rope
- Genome Medical, South San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Jamilyn M Zepp
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | | | - Beth Devine
- The Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy and Economics (CHOICE) Institute, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Galen Joseph
- Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Michael C Leo
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Katrina Goddard
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Benjamin S Wilfond
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics and Palliative Care, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Irving SA, Groom HC, Belongia EA, Crane B, Daley MF, Goddard K, Jackson LA, Kauffman TL, Kenigsberg TA, Kuckler L, Naleway AL, Patel SA, Tseng HF, Williams JTB, Weintraub ES. Influenza vaccination coverage among persons ages six months and older in the Vaccine Safety Datalink in the 2017-18 through 2022-23 influenza seasons. Vaccine 2023; 41:7138-7146. [PMID: 37866991 PMCID: PMC10867768 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.10.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Revised: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the United States, annual vaccination against seasonal influenza is recommended for all people ages ≥ 6 months. Vaccination coverage assessments can identify populations less protected from influenza morbidity and mortality and help to tailor vaccination efforts. Within the Vaccine Safety Datalink population ages ≥ 6 months, we report influenza vaccination coverage for the 2017-18 through 2022-23 seasons. METHODS Across eight health systems, we identified influenza vaccines administered from August 1 through March 31 for each season using electronic health records linked to immunization registries. Crude vaccination coverage was described for each season, overall and by self-reported sex; age group; self-reported race and ethnicity; and number of separate categories of diagnoses associated with increased risk of severe illness and complications from influenza (hereafter referred to as high-risk conditions). High-risk conditions were assessed using ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes assigned in the year preceding each influenza season. RESULTS Among individual cohorts of more than 12 million individuals each season, overall influenza vaccination coverage increased from 41.9 % in the 2017-18 season to a peak of 46.2 % in 2019-20, prior to declaration of the COVID-19 pandemic. Coverage declined over the next three seasons, coincident with widespread SARS-CoV-2 circulation, to a low of 40.3 % in the 2022-23 season. In each of the six seasons, coverage was lowest among males, 18-49-year-olds, non-Hispanic Black people, and those with no high-risk conditions. While decreases in coverage were present in all age groups, the declines were most substantial among children: 2022-23 season coverage for children ages six months through 8 years and 9-17 years was 24.5 % and 22.4 % (14 and 10 absolute percentage points), respectively, less than peak coverage achieved in the 2019-20 season. CONCLUSIONS Crude influenza vaccination coverage increased from 2017 to 18 through 2019-20, then decreased to the lowest level in the 2022-23 season. In this insured population, we identified persistent disparities in influenza vaccination coverage by sex, age, and race and ethnicity. The overall low coverage, disparities in coverage, and recent decreases in coverage are significant public health concerns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Holly C Groom
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland OR, USA
| | | | - Bradley Crane
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland OR, USA
| | - Matthew F Daley
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Denver CO, USA
| | - Kristin Goddard
- Vaccine Study Center, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland CA, USA
| | - Lisa A Jackson
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle WA, USA
| | - Tia L Kauffman
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland OR, USA
| | - Tat'Yana A Kenigsberg
- Immunization Safety Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta GA, USA
| | | | | | - Suchita A Patel
- Immunization Services Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta GA, USA
| | - Hung Fu Tseng
- Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena CA, USA
| | | | - Eric S Weintraub
- Immunization Safety Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Knerr S, Guo B, Wernli KJ, Mittendorf KF, Feigelson HS, Gilmore MJ, Jarvik GP, Kauffman TL, Keast E, Liles EG, Lynch FL, Muessig KR, Okuyama S, Veenstra DL, Zepp JM, Wilfond BS, Devine B, Goddard KAB. Longitudinal adherence to breast cancer surveillance following cancer genetic testing in an integrated health care system. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2023; 201:461-470. [PMID: 37470892 PMCID: PMC10503958 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-07007-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Screening with mammography and breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an important risk management strategy for individuals with inherited pathogenic variants (PVs) in genes associated with increased breast cancer risk. We describe longitudinal screening adherence in individuals who underwent cancer genetic testing as part of usual care in a vertically integrated health system. METHODS We determined the proportion time covered (PTC) by annual mammography and breast MRI for individuals with PVs in TP53, BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, NF1, CHEK2, and ATM. We determined time covered by biennial mammography beginning at age 50 years for individuals who received negative results, uncertain results, or with PVs in genes without specific breast cancer screening recommendations. RESULTS One hundred and forty individuals had PVs in TP53, BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, NF1, CHEK2, or ATM. Among these individuals, average PTC was 48% (range 0-99%) for annual screening mammography and 34% (range 0-100%) for annual breast MRI. Average PTC was highest for individuals with PVs in CHEK2 (N = 14) and lowest for individuals with PVs in TP53 (N = 3). Average PTC for biennial mammography (N = 1,027) was 49% (0-100%). CONCLUSION Longitudinal screening adherence in individuals with PVs in breast cancer associated genes, as measured by the proportion of time covered, is low; adherence to annual breast MRI falls below that of annual mammography. Additional research should examine screening behavior in individuals with PVs in breast cancer associated genes with a goal of developing interventions to improve adherence to recommended risk management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Knerr
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Box 351621, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
| | - Boya Guo
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Karen J Wernli
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Kathleen F Mittendorf
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics (TAG), Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | | | - Marian J Gilmore
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics (TAG), Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Gail P Jarvik
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Tia L Kauffman
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Erin Keast
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
| | | | - Frances L Lynch
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Kristin R Muessig
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics (TAG), Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Sonia Okuyama
- Denver Health and Hospital Authority, Denver, CO, USA
| | - David L Veenstra
- Department of Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jamilyn M Zepp
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics (TAG), Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Benjamin S Wilfond
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Beth Devine
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Box 351621, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
- Department of Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Katrina A B Goddard
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics (TAG), Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kenigsberg TA, Goddard K, Hanson KE, Lewis N, Klein N, Irving SA, Naleway AL, Crane B, Kauffman TL, Xu S, Daley MF, Hurley LP, Kaiser R, Jackson LA, Jazwa A, Weintraub ES. Simultaneous administration of mRNA COVID-19 bivalent booster and influenza vaccines. Vaccine 2023; 41:5678-5682. [PMID: 37599140 PMCID: PMC10661699 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.08.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Revised: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023]
Abstract
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration authorized use of mRNA COVID-19 bivalent booster vaccines on August 31, 2022. Currently, CDC's clinical guidance states that COVID-19 and other vaccines may be administered simultaneously. At time of authorization and recommendations, limited data existed describing simultaneous administration of COVID-19 bivalent booster and other vaccines. We describe simultaneous influenza and mRNA COVID-19 bivalent booster vaccine administration between August 31-December 31, 2022, among persons aged ≥6 months in the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) by COVID-19 bivalent booster vaccine type, influenza vaccine type, age group, sex, and race and ethnicity. Of 2,301,876 persons who received a COVID-19 bivalent booster vaccine, 737,992 (32.1%) received simultaneous influenza vaccine, majority were female (53.1%), aged ≥18 years (91.4%), and non-Hispanic White (55.7%). These findings can inform future VSD studies on simultaneous influenza and COVID-19 bivalent booster vaccine safety and coverage, which may have implications for immunization service delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kristin Goddard
- Kaiser Permanente Vaccine Study Center, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA
| | - Kayla E Hanson
- Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, WI, USA
| | - Ned Lewis
- Kaiser Permanente Vaccine Study Center, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA
| | - Nicola Klein
- Kaiser Permanente Vaccine Study Center, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Bradley Crane
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Tia L Kauffman
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Stanley Xu
- Kaiser Permanente Southern California Research and Evaluation, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | - Matthew F Daley
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, Denver, CO, USA
| | | | | | - Lisa A Jackson
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Amelia Jazwa
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Irving SA, Crane B, Weintraub E, Kauffman TL, Brooks N, Patel SA, Razzaghi H, Belongia EA, Daley MF, Getahun D, Glenn SC, Hambidge SJ, Jackson LA, Kharbanda E, Klein NP, Zerbo O, Naleway AL. Influenza Vaccination Among Pregnant People Before and During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic. Obstet Gynecol 2023; 142:636-639. [PMID: 37590982 PMCID: PMC10868709 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000005285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/25/2023] [Indexed: 08/19/2023]
Abstract
There are limited data on influenza vaccination coverage among pregnant people in the United States during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Within the Vaccine Safety Datalink, we conducted a retrospective cohort study to examine influenza vaccination coverage during the 2016-2017 through the 2021-2022 influenza seasons among pregnant people aged 18-49 years. Using influenza vaccines administered through March each season, we assessed crude coverage by demographic and clinical characteristics. Annual influenza vaccination coverage increased from the 2016-2017 season (63.0%) to a high of 71.0% in the 2019-2020 season. After the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, it decreased to a low of 56.4% (2021-2022). In each of the six seasons, coverage was lowest among pregnant people aged 18-24 years and among non-Hispanic Black pregnant people. The 2021-2022 season had the lowest coverage across all age and race and ethnicity groups. The recent decreases highlight the need for continued efforts to improve coverage among pregnant people.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie A Irving
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon; the Immunization Safety Office and the Immunization Services Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia; the Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, Wisconsin; the Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, and Denver Health, Denver, Colorado; Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, and the Vaccine Study Center, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California; the Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington; and the HealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Guo B, Knerr S, Kauffman TL, Mittendorf KF, Keast E, Gilmore MJ, Feigelson HS, Lynch FL, Muessig KR, Okuyama S, Zepp JM, Veenstra DL, Hsu L, Phipps AI, Lindström S, Leo MC, Goddard KAB, Wilfond BS, Devine B. Risk management actions following genetic testing in the Cancer Health Assessments Reaching Many (CHARM) Study: A prospective cohort study. Cancer Med 2023; 12:19112-19125. [PMID: 37644850 PMCID: PMC10557878 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Revised: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/18/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Genetic testing can identify cancer risk early, enabling prevention and early detection. We describe use of risk management interventions following genetic testing in the Cancer Health Assessment Reaching Many (CHARM) study. CHARM assessed risk and provided genetic testing to low income, low literacy, and other underserved populations that historically face barriers to accessing cancer genetic services. METHODS CHARM was implemented in Kaiser Permanente Northwest (KPNW) and Denver Health (DH) between 2018 and 2020. We identified post-testing screening (mammography, breast MRI, colonoscopy) and surgical (mastectomy, oophorectomy) procedures using electronic health records. We examined utilization in participants who did and did not receive actionable risk management recommendations from study genetic counselors following national guidelines. RESULTS CHARM participants were followed for an average of 15.4 months (range: 0.4-27.8 months) after results disclosure. Less than 2% (11/680) received actionable risk management recommendations (i.e., could be completed in the initial years following testing) based on their test result. Among those who received actionable recommendations, risk management utilization was moderate (54.5%, 6/11 completed any procedure) and varied by procedure (mammogram: 0/3; MRI: 2/4; colonoscopy: 4/5; mastectomy: 1/5; oophorectomy: 0/3). Cancer screening and surgery procedures were rare in participants without actionable recommendations. CONCLUSION Though the number of participants who received actionable risk management recommendations was small, our results suggest that implementing CHARM's risk assessment and testing model increased access to evidence-based genetic services and provided opportunities for patients to engage in recommended preventive care, without encouraging risk management overuse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Boya Guo
- School of Public HealthUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Sarah Knerr
- School of Public HealthUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Tia L. Kauffman
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente NorthwestPortlandOregonUSA
| | - Kathleen F. Mittendorf
- Vanderbilt‐Ingram Cancer CenterVanderbilt University Medical CenterNashvilleTennesseeUSA
| | - Erin Keast
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente NorthwestPortlandOregonUSA
| | - Marian J. Gilmore
- Department of Translational and Applied GenomicsCenter for Health ResearchPortlandOregonUSA
| | | | - Frances L. Lynch
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente NorthwestPortlandOregonUSA
| | - Kristin R. Muessig
- Department of Translational and Applied GenomicsCenter for Health ResearchPortlandOregonUSA
| | - Sonia Okuyama
- Division of Oncology, Denver Health and Hospital AuthorityDenverColoradoUSA
| | - Jamilyn M. Zepp
- Department of Translational and Applied GenomicsCenter for Health ResearchPortlandOregonUSA
| | - David L. Veenstra
- The Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, and Economics (CHOICE) Institute, School of PharmacyUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Li Hsu
- School of Public HealthUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWashingtonUSA
- Division of Public Health SciencesFred Hutchinson Cancer CenterSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Amanda I. Phipps
- School of Public HealthUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWashingtonUSA
- Division of Public Health SciencesFred Hutchinson Cancer CenterSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Sara Lindström
- School of Public HealthUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWashingtonUSA
- Division of Public Health SciencesFred Hutchinson Cancer CenterSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Michael C. Leo
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente NorthwestPortlandOregonUSA
| | - Katrina A. B. Goddard
- Department of Translational and Applied GenomicsCenter for Health ResearchPortlandOregonUSA
| | - Benjamin S. Wilfond
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric BioethicsSeattle Children's Research InstituteSeattleWashingtonUSA
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Bioethics and Palliative CareUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Beth Devine
- School of Public HealthUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWashingtonUSA
- The Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, and Economics (CHOICE) Institute, School of PharmacyUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWashingtonUSA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Joseph G, Lindberg NM, Guerra C, Hernandez C, Karliner LS, Gilmore MJ, Zepp J, Rolf BA, Caruncho M, Riddle L, Kauffman TL, Leo MC, Wilfond BS. Medical interpreter-mediated genetic counseling for Spanish preferring adults at risk for a hereditary cancer syndrome. J Genet Couns 2023; 32:870-886. [PMID: 36938783 PMCID: PMC10509308 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Revised: 02/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/21/2023]
Abstract
The objective of this study was to identify interpretation challenges specific to exome sequencing and errors of potential clinical significance in the context of genetic counseling for adults at risk for a hereditary cancer syndrome. Thirty transcripts of interpreter-mediated telephone results disclosure genetic counseling appointments were coded for errors by bilingual researchers, and the coders applied an overall rating to denote the degree to which the errors interfered with communication overall. Genetic counselors reviewed a subset of errors flagged for potential clinical significance to identify those likely to have clinical impact. Qualitative interviews with 19 interpreters were analyzed to elucidate the challenges they face in interpreting for genetic counseling appointments. Our analysis identified common interpretation errors such as raising the register, omissions, and additions. Further, we found errors specific to genetic counseling concepts and content that appeared to impact the ability of the genetic counselor to accurately assess risk. These errors also may have impacted the patient's ability to understand their results, access appropriate follow-up care, and communicate with family members. Among interpreters' strengths was the use of requests for clarification; in fact, even more use of clarification would have been beneficial in these encounters. Qualitative interviews surfaced challenges stemming from the structure of interpreter work, such as switching from medical and nonmedical interpretations without substantial breaks. Importantly, while errors were frequent, most did not impede communication overall, and most were not likely to impact clinical care. Nevertheless, potentially clinically impactful errors in communication of genetics concepts may contribute to inequitable care for limited English proficient patients and suggest that additional training in genetics and specialization in healthcare may be warranted. In addition, training for genetic counselors and guidance for patients in working effectively with interpreters could enhance interpreters' transmission of complex genetic concepts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Galen Joseph
- Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | | | - Claudia Guerra
- Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Cindy Hernandez
- Cancer Genetics and Prevention Program, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Leah S Karliner
- Department of General Internal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Marian J Gilmore
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Jamilyn Zepp
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Bradley A Rolf
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Mikaella Caruncho
- Department of Medical Humanities and Ethics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Leslie Riddle
- Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Tia L Kauffman
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Michael C Leo
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Benjamin S Wilfond
- Seattle Children's Research Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Naleway AL, Henninger ML, Irving SA, Bianca Salas S, Kauffman TL, Crane B, Mittendorf KF, Harsh S, Elder C, Gee J. Epidemiology of Upper Limb Complex Regional Pain Syndrome in a Retrospective Cohort of Persons Aged 9-30 Years, 2002-2017. Perm J 2023:1-12. [PMID: 37154719 DOI: 10.7812/tpp/22.170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
Introduction This paper describes the epidemiology and clinical presentation of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) in a large, integrated health care delivery system; and CRPS incidence rates (IRs) over a time period spanning human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine licensure and published case reports of CRPS following HPV vaccination. Methods The authors examined CRPS diagnoses in patients aged 9-30 years between January 2002 and December 2017 using electronic medical records, excluding patients with lower limb diagnoses only. Medical record abstraction and adjudication were conducted to verify diagnoses and describe clinical characteristics. CRPS IRs were calculated for 3 periods: Period 1 (2002-2006: before HPV vaccine licensure), Period 2 (2007-2012: after licensure but before published case reports), and Period 3 (2013-2017: after published case reports). Results A total of 231 individuals received an upper limb or unspecified CRPS diagnosis code during the study period; 113 cases were verified through abstraction and adjudication. Most verified cases (73%) were associated with a clear precipitating event (eg, non-vaccine-related injury, surgical procedure). The authors identified only 1 case in which a practitioner attributed CRPS onset to HPV vaccination. Twenty-five incident cases occurred in Period 1 (IR = 4.35/100,000 person-years (PY), 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.94-6.44), 42 in Period 2 (IR = 5.94/100,000 PY, 95% CI = 4.39-8.04), and 29 in Period 3 (IR = 4.53/100,000 PY, 95% CI = 3.15-6.52); differences between periods were not statistically significant. Conclusion These data provide a comprehensive assessment of the epidemiology and characteristics of CRPS in children and young adults and provide further reassurance about the safety of HPV vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - S Bianca Salas
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Tia L Kauffman
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Bradley Crane
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Kathleen F Mittendorf
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Stacy Harsh
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Charles Elder
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Julianne Gee
- Immunization Safety Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Okuyama S, White LL, Anderson KP, Medina E, Deutsch S, Ransom C, Jackson P, Kauffman TL, Mittendorf KF, Leo MC, Bulkley JE, Wilfond BS, Goddard KA, Feigelson HS. Evaluating cancer genetic services in a safety net system: overcoming barriers for a lasting impact beyond the CHARM research project. J Community Genet 2023:10.1007/s12687-023-00647-x. [PMID: 37126135 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-023-00647-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 04/14/2023] [Indexed: 05/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Underserved patients face substantial barriers to receiving cancer genetic services. The Cancer Health Assessments Reaching Many (CHARM) study evaluated ways to increase access to genetic testing for individuals in underserved populations at risk for hereditary cancer syndromes (HCS). Here, we report the successful implementation of CHARM in a low-resource environment and the development of sustainable processes to continue genetic risk assessment in this setting. The research team involved key clinical personnel and patient advisors at Denver Health to provide input on study methods and materials. Through iterative and collaborative stakeholder engagement, the team identified barriers and developed solutions that would both facilitate participation in CHARM and be feasible to implement and sustain long term in clinical care. With a focus on infrastructure building, educational modules were developed to increase awareness among referring providers, and standard methods of identifying and managing HCS patients were implemented in the electronic medical record. Three hundred sixty-four DH patients successfully completed the risk assessment tool within the study, and we observed a sustained increase in referrals to genetics for HCS (from 179 in 2017 to 427 in 2021 post-intervention). Implementation of the CHARM study at a low-resourced safety net health system resulted in sustainable improvements in access to cancer genetic risk assessment and services that continue even after the study ended.Trial registration NCT03426878.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonia Okuyama
- Division of Oncology, Denver Health and Hospital Authority, Denver, CO, USA.
| | - Larissa L White
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, Aurora, CO, USA
| | | | - Elizabeth Medina
- Ambulatory Care Services, Denver Health and Hospital Authority, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Sonia Deutsch
- Ambulatory Care Services, Denver Health and Hospital Authority, Denver, CO, USA
| | | | - Paige Jackson
- Denver Health and Hospital Authority, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Tia L Kauffman
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
| | | | - Michael C Leo
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Joanna E Bulkley
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Benjamin S Wilfond
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Research Institute and Hospital, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Katrina Ab Goddard
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Knerr S, Guo B, Mittendorf KF, Feigelson HS, Gilmore MJ, Jarvik GP, Kauffman TL, Keast E, Lynch FL, Muessig KR, Okuyama S, Veenstra DL, Zepp JM, Goddard KA, Devine B. Risk-reducing surgery in unaffected individuals receiving cancer genetic testing in an integrated health care system. Cancer 2022; 128:3090-3098. [PMID: 35679147 PMCID: PMC9308746 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Revised: 05/03/2022] [Accepted: 05/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Germline genetic testing enables primary cancer prevention, including through prophylactic surgery. We examined risk-reducing surgeries in unaffected individuals tested for hereditary cancer susceptibly between 2010 and 2018 in the Kaiser Permanente Northwest health system. METHODS We used an internal genetic testing database to create a cohort of individuals who received tests including one or more high-penetrance hereditary cancer susceptibility gene. We then identified, after testing, bilateral mastectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO), and total hysterectomy procedures in electronic health record and claims data through 2019. We describe surgery utilization by genetic test results and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. RESULTS The cohort included 1020 individuals, 16% with pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants in one or more of the following genes: BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, APC, MUTYH, ATM, MSH2, PALB2, BRIP1, MLH1, MSH6, EPCAM, FLCN, RAD51C, RAD51D, or TP53. Among individuals with P/LP variants making them candidates for mastectomy, BSO, or hysterectomy per NCCN guidelines, 34% (33/97), 24% (23/94), and 8% (1/12), respectively, underwent surgery during follow-up. Fifty-three percent (18/37) of hysterectomies were among APC, BRCA1, and BRCA2 P/LP variant heterozygotes, typically concurrent with BSO. Three individuals with variants of uncertain significance (only) and 22 with negative results had prophylactic surgery after genetic testing. CONCLUSIONS Uptake of risk-reducing surgery following usual care genetic testing appears to be lower than in studies that actively recruit high-risk patients and provide testing and follow-up care in specialized settings. Factors in addition to genetic test results and NCCN guidelines motivate prophylactic surgery use and deserve further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Knerr
- School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Boya Guo
- School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Kathleen F. Mittendorf
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR
| | | | - Marian J. Gilmore
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR
| | - Gail P. Jarvik
- School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Tia L. Kauffman
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland OR
| | - Erin Keast
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland OR
| | - Frances L. Lynch
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland OR
| | - Kristin R. Muessig
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR
| | - Sonia Okuyama
- Division of Oncology, Denver Health and Hospital Authority, Denver, CO
| | - David L. Veenstra
- The Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy and Economics (CHOICE) Institute, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Jamilyn M. Zepp
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR
| | - Katrina A.B. Goddard
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR
| | - Beth Devine
- The Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy and Economics (CHOICE) Institute, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Liles EG, Leo MC, Freed AS, Porter KM, Zepp JM, Kauffman TL, Keast E, McMullen CK, Gruß I, Biesecker BB, Muessig KR, Eubanks DJ, Amendola LM, Dorschner MO, Rolf BA, Jarvik GP, Goddard KAB, Wilfond BS. ORCA, a values-based decision aid for selecting additional findings from genomic sequencing in adults: Efficacy results from a randomized trial. Genet Med 2022; 24:1664-1674. [PMID: 35522237 PMCID: PMC9586129 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2021] [Revised: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Individuals having genomic sequencing can choose to be notified about pathogenic variants in genes unrelated to the testing indication. A decision aid can facilitate weighing one's values before making a choice about these additional results. METHODS We conducted a randomized trial (N = 231) comparing informed values-choice congruence among adults at risk for a hereditary cancer syndrome who viewed either the Optional Results Choice Aid (ORCA) or web-based additional findings information alone. ORCA is values-focused with a low-literacy design. RESULTS Individuals in both arms had informed values-choice congruence (75% and 73% in the decision aid and web-based groups, respectively; odds ratio [OR] = 1.10, 95% CI = 0.58-2.08). Most participants had adequate knowledge (79% and 76% in the decision aid and web-based groups, respectively; OR = 1.20, 95% CI = 0.61-2.34), with no significant difference between groups. Most had information-seeking values (97% and 98% in the decision aid and web-based groups, respectively; OR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.10-3.61) and chose to receive additional findings. CONCLUSION The ORCA decision aid did not significantly improve informed values-choice congruence over web-based information in this cohort of adults deciding about genomic results. Both web-based approaches may be effective for adults to decide about receiving medically actionable additional results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Michael C Leo
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR
| | - Amanda S Freed
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Kathryn M Porter
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA
| | - Jamilyn M Zepp
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR
| | - Tia L Kauffman
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR
| | - Erin Keast
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR
| | | | - Inga Gruß
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR
| | - Barbara B Biesecker
- Genetics, Bioinformatics and Translation, RTI International, Washington, D.C
| | - Kristin R Muessig
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR
| | | | - Laura M Amendola
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Michael O Dorschner
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Bradley A Rolf
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Gail P Jarvik
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Katrina A B Goddard
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR
| | - Benjamin S Wilfond
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA; Division of Bioethics and Palliative Care, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Mittendorf KF, Lewis HS, Duenas DM, Eubanks DJ, Gilmore MJ, Goddard KAB, Joseph G, Kauffman TL, Kraft SA, Lindberg NM, Reyes AA, Shuster E, Syngal S, Ukaegbu C, Zepp JM, Wilfond BS, Porter KM. Literacy-adapted, electronic family history assessment for genetics referral in primary care: patient user insights from qualitative interviews. Hered Cancer Clin Pract 2022; 20:22. [PMID: 35689290 PMCID: PMC9188215 DOI: 10.1186/s13053-022-00231-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Risk assessment for hereditary cancer syndromes is recommended in primary care, but family history is rarely collected in enough detail to facilitate risk assessment and referral - a roadblock that disproportionately impacts individuals with healthcare access barriers. We sought to qualitatively assess a literacy-adapted, electronic patient-facing family history tool developed for use in diverse, underserved patient populations recruited in the Cancer Health Assessments Reaching Many (CHARM) Study. METHODS Interview participants were recruited from a subpopulation of CHARM participants who experienced barriers to tool use in terms of spending a longer time to complete the tool, having incomplete attempts, and/or providing inaccurate family history in comparison to a genetic counselor-collected standard. We conducted semi-structured interviews with participants about barriers and facilitators to tool use and overall tool acceptability; interviews were recorded and professionally transcribed. Transcripts were coded based on a codebook developed using inductive techniques, and coded excerpts were reviewed to identify overarching themes related to barriers and facilitators to family history self-assessment and acceptability of the study tool. RESULTS Interviewees endorsed the tool as easy to navigate and understand. However, they described barriers related to family history information, literacy and language, and certain tool functions. Participants offered concrete, easy-to-implement solutions to each barrier. Despite experience barriers to use of the tool, most participants indicated that electronic family history self-assessment was acceptable or preferable in comparison to clinician-collected family history. CONCLUSIONS Even for participants who experienced barriers to tool use, family history self-assessment was considered an acceptable alternative to clinician-collected family history. Barriers experienced could be overcome with minor adaptations to the current family history tool. TRIAL REGISTRATION This study is a sub-study of the Cancer Health Assessments Reaching Many (CHARM) trial, ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03426878. Registered 8 February 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathleen F Mittendorf
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 2525 West End Avenue, Nashville, TN, 37203, USA
| | - Hannah S Lewis
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Research Institute, 1900 9th Ave, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA
| | - Devan M Duenas
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Research Institute, 1900 9th Ave, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA
| | - Donna J Eubanks
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 N. Interstate Ave, Portland, OR, 97227, USA
| | - Marian J Gilmore
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 N. Interstate Ave, Portland, OR, 97227, USA
| | - Katrina A B Goddard
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Galen Joseph
- Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of California San Francisco, 490 Illinois Street, 7th Floor, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| | - Tia L Kauffman
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 N. Interstate Ave, Portland, OR, 97227, USA
| | - Stephanie A Kraft
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Research Institute, 1900 9th Ave, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, Division of Bioethics and Palliative Care, University of Washington, 1959 NE. Pacific St, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Nangel M Lindberg
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 N. Interstate Ave, Portland, OR, 97227, USA
| | - Ana A Reyes
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 N. Interstate Ave, Portland, OR, 97227, USA
| | - Elizabeth Shuster
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 N. Interstate Ave, Portland, OR, 97227, USA
| | - Sapna Syngal
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.,Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.,Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Chinedu Ukaegbu
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.,Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Jamilyn M Zepp
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 N. Interstate Ave, Portland, OR, 97227, USA
| | - Benjamin S Wilfond
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Research Institute, 1900 9th Ave, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, Division of Bioethics and Palliative Care, University of Washington, 1959 NE. Pacific St, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Kathryn M Porter
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Research Institute, 1900 9th Ave, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Amendola LM, Shuster E, Leo MC, Dorschner MO, Rolf BA, Shirts BH, Gilmore MJ, Okuyama S, Zepp JM, Kauffman TL, Mittendorf KF, Bellcross C, Jenkins CL, Joseph G, Riddle L, Syngal S, Ukaegbu C, Goddard KAB, Wilfond BS, Jarvik GP. Laboratory-related outcomes from integrating an accessible delivery model for hereditary cancer risk assessment and genetic testing in populations with barriers to access. Genet Med 2022; 24:1196-1205. [PMID: 35305866 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2021] [Revised: 02/05/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to evaluate the laboratory-related outcomes of participants who were offered genomic testing based on cancer family history risk assessment tools. METHODS Patients from clinics that serve populations with access barriers, who are screened at risk for a hereditary cancer syndrome based on adapted family history collection tools (the Breast Cancer Genetics Referral Screening Tool and PREMM5), were offered exome-based panel testing for cancer risk and medically actionable secondary findings. We used descriptive statistics, electronic health record review, and inferential statistics to explore participant characteristics and results, consultations and actions related to pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants identified, and variables predicting category of findings, respectively. RESULTS Of all the participants, 87% successfully returned a saliva kit. Overall, 5% had a pathogenic/likely pathogenic cancer risk variant and 1% had a secondary finding. Almost all (14/15, 93%) participants completed recommended consultations with nongenetics providers after an average of 17 months. The recommended actions (eg, breast magnetic resonance imaging) were completed by 17 of 25 participants. Participant personal history of cancer and PREMM5 score were each associated with the category of findings (history and colon cancer finding, Fisher's exact P = .02; history and breast cancer finding, Fisher's exact P = .01; PREMM5TM score; and colon cancer finding, Fisher's exact P < .001). CONCLUSION This accessible model of hereditary cancer risk assessment and genetic testing yielded results that were often acted upon by patients and physicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura M Amendola
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA.
| | - Elizabeth Shuster
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR
| | - Michael C Leo
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR
| | - Michael O Dorschner
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, UW Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Bradley A Rolf
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Brian H Shirts
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, UW Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Marian J Gilmore
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics (TAG), Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR
| | - Sonia Okuyama
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Denver Health and Hospital Authority, Denver, CO
| | - Jamilyn M Zepp
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics (TAG), Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR
| | - Tia L Kauffman
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR
| | - Kathleen F Mittendorf
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics (TAG), Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR
| | - Cecilia Bellcross
- Department of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Charisma L Jenkins
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics (TAG), Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR
| | - Galen Joseph
- Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Leslie Riddle
- Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Sapna Syngal
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Division of Gastroenterology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Chinedu Ukaegbu
- Department of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Katrina A B Goddard
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics (TAG), Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR
| | - Benjamin S Wilfond
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA; Division of Bioethics and Paliative Care, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Gail P Jarvik
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Muenzen KD, Amendola LM, Kauffman TL, Mittendorf KF, Bensen JT, Chen F, Green R, Powell BC, Kvale M, Angelo F, Farnan L, Fullerton SM, Robinson JO, Li T, Murali P, Lawlor JM, Ou J, Hindorff LA, Jarvik GP, Crosslin DR. Lessons learned and recommendations for data coordination in collaborative research: The CSER consortium experience. Human Genetics and Genomics Advances 2022; 3:100120. [PMID: 35707062 PMCID: PMC9190054 DOI: 10.1016/j.xhgg.2022.100120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Integrating data across heterogeneous research environments is a key challenge in multi-site, collaborative research projects. While it is important to allow for natural variation in data collection protocols across research sites, it is also important to achieve interoperability between datasets in order to reap the full benefits of collaborative work. However, there are few standards to guide the data coordination process from project conception to completion. In this paper, we describe the experiences of the Clinical Sequence Evidence-Generating Research (CSER) consortium Data Coordinating Center (DCC), which coordinated harmonized survey and genomic sequencing data from seven clinical research sites from 2020 to 2022. Using input from multiple consortium working groups and from CSER leadership, we first identify 14 lessons learned from CSER in the categories of communication, harmonization, informatics, compliance, and analytics. We then distill these lessons learned into 11 recommendations for future research consortia in the areas of planning, communication, informatics, and analytics. We recommend that planning and budgeting for data coordination activities occur as early as possible during consortium conceptualization and development to minimize downstream complications. We also find that clear, reciprocal, and continuous communication between consortium stakeholders and the DCC is equally important to maintaining a secure and centralized informatics ecosystem for pooling data. Finally, we discuss the importance of actively interrogating current approaches to data governance, particularly for research studies that straddle the research-clinical divide.
Collapse
|
18
|
Crain PR, Zepp JM, Gille S, Jenkins L, Kauffman TL, Shuster E, Goddard KAB, Wilfond BS, Hunter JE. Identifying patients with Lynch syndrome using a universal tumor screening program in an integrated healthcare system. Hered Cancer Clin Pract 2022; 20:17. [PMID: 35436948 PMCID: PMC9014602 DOI: 10.1186/s13053-022-00217-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Lynch syndrome (LS) is associated with an increased risk of colorectal (CRC) and endometrial (EC) cancers. Universal tumor screening (UTS) of all individuals diagnosed with CRC and EC is recommended to increase identification of LS. Kaiser Permanente Northwest (KPNW) implemented a UTS program for LS among individuals newly diagnosed with CRC in January 2016 and EC in November 2016. UTS at KPNW begins with immunohistochemistry (IHC) of tumor tissue to determine loss of mismatch repair proteins associated with LS (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2)., IHC showing loss of MLH1 is followed by reflex testing (automatic testing) to detect the presence of the BRAF V600E variant (in cases of CRC) and MLH1 promoter hypermethylation to rule out likely sporadic cases. Materials and methods Individuals newly diagnosed with CRC and EC were identified between the initiation of the respective UTS programs and July 2018. Electronic medical records were reviewed to extract patient data related to UTS, including IHC and reflex testing results, date of referrals to the genetics department, and results of germline genetic testing for LS. Results 313 out of 362 individuals diagnosed with CRC and 61 out of 64 individuals diagnosed with EC who were eligible were screened by IHC for LS. Most (47/52 or 90%, including 46/49 CRC and 1/3 EC) individuals that were not screened by IHC only had a biopsy sample available. Fourteen individuals (3.7% overall, including 13/313 CRC and 1/61 EC) received an abnormal result after reflex testing and were referred for genetic counseling. Of these, 10 individuals (71% overall, including 9/13 CRC and 1/1 EC) underwent germline genetic testing for LS. Five individuals diagnosed with CRC were found to have pathogenic variants. in PMS2 (n = 3), MLH1 (n = 1), and MSH6 (n = 1). No pathogenic variants were identified in individuals diagnosed with EC. Conclusions UTS identified individuals at risk for LS. Most individuals who screened positive for LS had follow-up germline genetic testing for LS. The consistent use of biopsy samples is an opportunity to improve UTS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip R Crain
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jamilyn M Zepp
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Sara Gille
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Lindsay Jenkins
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Tia L Kauffman
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Elizabeth Shuster
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Katrina A B Goddard
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Benjamin S Wilfond
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Department of Pediatrics, Seattle Children's Research Institute and Hospital, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jessica Ezzell Hunter
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Duenas DM, Shipman KJ, Porter KM, Shuster E, Guerra C, Reyes A, Kauffman TL, Hunter JE, Goddard KAB, Wilfond BS, Kraft SA. Motivations and concerns of patients considering participation in an implementation study of a hereditary cancer risk assessment program in diverse primary care settings. Genet Med 2022; 24:610-621. [PMID: 34906471 PMCID: PMC8939763 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2021.11.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2021] [Revised: 11/17/2021] [Accepted: 11/17/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Understanding the motivations and concerns of patients from diverse populations regarding participation in implementation research provides the needed evidence about how to design and conduct studies for facilitating access to genetics services. Within a hereditary cancer screening study assessing a multifaceted intervention, we examined primary care patients' motivations and concerns about participation. METHODS We surveyed and interviewed study participants after they enrolled, surveyed those who did not complete enrollment, and used descriptive qualitative and quantitative methods to identify motivations and concerns regarding participation. RESULTS Survey respondents' most common motivations included a desire to learn about their future risk (81%), receiving information that may help family (58%), and a desire to advance research (34%). Interviews revealed 3 additional important factors: affordability of testing, convenience of participation, and clinical relationships supporting research decision-making. Survey data of those who declined enrollment showed that the reasons for declining included concerns about privacy (38%), burdens of the research (19%), and their fear of not being able to cope with the genetic information (19%). CONCLUSION Understanding the facilitating factors and concerns that contribute to decisions about research may reveal ways to improve equity in access to care and research that could lead to greater uptake of genomic medicine across diverse primary care patient populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Devan M Duenas
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute, Seattle, WA.
| | - Kelly J Shipman
- Palliative Care and Resilience Research Program, Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute, Seattle, WA
| | - Kathryn M Porter
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute, Seattle, WA
| | - Elizabeth Shuster
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR
| | - Claudia Guerra
- Department of Anthropology, History and Social Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Ana Reyes
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR
| | - Tia L Kauffman
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR
| | | | - Katrina A B Goddard
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| | - Benjamin S Wilfond
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute, Seattle, WA; Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Stephanie A Kraft
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute, Seattle, WA; Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Muessig KR, Zepp JM, Keast E, Shuster EE, Reyes AA, Arnold B, Ingphakorn C, Gilmore MJ, Kauffman TL, Hunter JE, Knerr S, Feigelson HS, Goddard KAB. Retrospective assessment of barriers and access to genetic services for hereditary cancer syndromes in an integrated health care delivery system. Hered Cancer Clin Pract 2022; 20:7. [PMID: 35144679 PMCID: PMC8832647 DOI: 10.1186/s13053-022-00213-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Accepted: 01/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background A critical step in access to genetic testing for hereditary cancer syndromes is referral for genetic counseling to assess personal and family risk. Individuals meeting testing guidelines have the greatest need to be evaluated. However, referrals to genetics are underutilized in US patients with hereditary cancer syndromes, especially within traditionally underserved populations, including racial and ethnic minorities, low-income, and non-English speaking patients. Methods We studied existing processes for referral to genetic evaluation and testing for hereditary cancer risk to identify areas of potential improvement in delivering these services, especially for traditionally underserved patients. We conducted a retrospective review of 820 referrals to the Kaiser Permanente Northwest (KPNW) genetics department containing diagnosis codes for hereditary cancer risk. We classified referrals as high- or low-quality based on whether sufficient information was provided to determine if patients met national practice guidelines for testing. Through chart abstraction, we also assessed consistency with practice guidelines, whether the referral resulted in a visit to the genetics department for evaluation, and clinical characteristics of patients receiving genetic testing. Results Most referrals (n = 514, 63%) contained sufficient information to assess the appropriateness of referral; of those, 92% met practice guidelines for genetic testing. Half of referred patients (50%) were not offered genetic evaluation; only 31% received genetic testing. We identified several barriers to receiving genetic evaluation and testing, the biggest barrier being completion of a family history form sent to patients following the referral. Those with a referral consistent with testing guidelines, were more likely to receive genetic testing than those without (39% vs. 29%, respectively; p = 0.0058). Traditionally underserved patients were underrepresented in those receiving genetic evaluation and testing relative to the overall adult KPNW population. Conclusions Process improvements are needed to increase access to genetic services to diagnose hereditary cancer syndromes prior to development of cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin R Muessig
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 N Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR, 97227, USA.
| | - Jamilyn M Zepp
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 N Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR, 97227, USA
| | - Erin Keast
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 N Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR, 97227, USA
| | - Elizabeth E Shuster
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 N Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR, 97227, USA
| | - Ana A Reyes
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 N Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR, 97227, USA
| | - Briana Arnold
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 N Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR, 97227, USA
| | - Chalinya Ingphakorn
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 N Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR, 97227, USA
| | - Marian J Gilmore
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 N Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR, 97227, USA
| | - Tia L Kauffman
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 N Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR, 97227, USA
| | - Jessica Ezzell Hunter
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 N Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR, 97227, USA
| | - Sarah Knerr
- Department of Health Services, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Heather S Feigelson
- Institute for Health Research Kaiser Permanente Colorado, 10065 E Harvard Avenue #300, Denver, CO, 80231, USA
| | - Katrina A B Goddard
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 N Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR, 97227, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Mittendorf KF, Kauffman TL, Amendola LM, Anderson KP, Biesecker BB, Dorschner MO, Duenas DM, Eubanks DJ, Feigelson HS, Gilmore MJ, Hunter JE, Joseph G, Kraft SA, Lee SSJ, Leo MC, Liles EG, Lindberg NM, Muessig KR, Okuyama S, Porter KM, Riddle LS, Rolf BA, Rope AF, Zepp JM, Jarvik GP, Wilfond BS, Goddard KA. Corrigendum to “Cancer Health Assessments Reaching Many (CHARM): A clinical trial assessing a multimodal cancer genetics services delivery program and its impact on diverse populations” [Contemporary Clinical Trials 106 (2021) 106432]. Contemp Clin Trials 2022; 114:106682. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106682] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
22
|
Mittendorf KF, Knerr S, Kauffman TL, Lindberg NM, Anderson KP, Feigelson HS, Gilmore MJ, Hunter JE, Joseph G, Kraft SA, Zepp JM, Syngal S, Wilfond BS, Goddard KAB. Systemic Barriers to Risk-Reducing Interventions for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes: Implications for Health Care Inequities. JCO Precis Oncol 2021; 5:PO.21.00233. [PMID: 34778694 PMCID: PMC8585306 DOI: 10.1200/po.21.00233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2021] [Revised: 09/21/2021] [Accepted: 09/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Kathleen F. Mittendorf
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR
| | - Sarah Knerr
- School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Tia L. Kauffman
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR
| | - Nangel M. Lindberg
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR
| | | | | | - Marian J. Gilmore
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR
| | - Jessica Ezzell Hunter
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR
| | - Galen Joseph
- Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA
| | - Stephanie A. Kraft
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute, Seattle, WA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Jamilyn M. Zepp
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR
| | - Sapna Syngal
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Benjamin S. Wilfond
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute, Seattle, WA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Katrina A. B. Goddard
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kauffman TL, Dickerson JF, Lynch FL, Leo MC, Shuster E, Wilfond BS, Himes P, Gilmore MJ, Rollins NJ, Goddard KAB. Impact of expanded carrier screening on health care utilization. Am J Manag Care 2021; 27:316-321. [PMID: 34460173 DOI: 10.37765/ajmc.2021.88722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate potential consequences of expanded carrier screening (ECS) for reproductive risk on health care utilization among women who are not at increased reproductive risk. STUDY DESIGN Women planning pregnancy were randomized to usual care carrier screening or ECS to assess reproductive risks. Electronic health record (EHR) data were used to evaluate the effects of ECS on pregnancy-related utilization and general health care utilization among all study participants who did not receive positive ECS results of at least a 25% risk (ie, received negative [normal] ECS results). METHODS EHR data were extracted through research-ready databases and extensive chart review for 304 participants. We analyzed the effect of ECS for women who were not found to be at increased reproductive risk on (1) utilization of mental health services in the period between randomization and initial results disclosure; (2) utilization of general outpatient and inpatient services, specialty services, and mental health-related services in the year following randomization; and (3) utilization and refusal of pregnancy-related services among pregnant women (n = 129) prior to and following randomization. RESULTS No significant differences in health care utilization were found between women randomized to receive ECS and those receiving usual care. Women who received negative ECS results did not refuse recommended screening for conditions that are not identified via ECS at a higher rate than women in the usual care arm. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that ECS does not have unintended negative impacts on the health care system for the majority of patients who are not at increased reproductive risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tia L Kauffman
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 N Interstate Ave, Portland, OR 97227.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Mittendorf KF, Kauffman TL, Amendola LM, Anderson KP, Biesecker BB, Dorschner MO, Duenas DM, Eubanks DJ, Feigelson HS, Gilmore MJ, Hunter JE, Joseph G, Kraft SA, Lee SSJ, Leo MC, Liles EG, Lindberg NM, Muessig KR, Okuyama S, Porter KM, Riddle LS, Rolf BA, Rope AF, Zepp JM, Jarvik GP, Wilfond BS, Goddard KAB. Cancer Health Assessments Reaching Many (CHARM): A clinical trial assessing a multimodal cancer genetics services delivery program and its impact on diverse populations. Contemp Clin Trials 2021; 106:106432. [PMID: 33984519 PMCID: PMC8336568 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2021] [Revised: 05/06/2021] [Accepted: 05/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Advances in the application of genomic technologies in clinical care have the potential to increase existing healthcare disparities. Studies have consistently shown that only a fraction of eligible patients with a family history of cancer receive recommended cancer genetic counseling and subsequent genetic testing. Care delivery models using pre-test and post-test counseling are not scalable, which contributes to barriers in accessing genetics services. These barriers are even more pronounced for patients in historically underserved populations. We have designed a multimodal intervention to improve subsequent cancer surveillance, by improving the identification of patients at risk for familial cancer syndromes, reducing barriers to genetic counseling/testing, and increasing patient understanding of complex genetic results. We are evaluating this intervention in two large, integrated healthcare systems that serve diverse patient populations (NCT03426878). The primary outcome is the number of diagnostic (hereditary cancer syndrome) findings. We are examining the clinical and personal utility of streamlined pathways to genetic testing using electronic medical record data, surveys, and qualitative interviews. We will assess downstream care utilization of individuals receiving usual clinical care vs. genetic testing through the study. We will evaluate the impacts of a literacy-focused genetic counseling approach versus usual care genetic counseling on care utilization and participant understanding, satisfaction, and family communication. By recruiting participants belonging to historically underserved populations, this study is uniquely positioned to evaluate the potential of a novel genetics care delivery program to reduce care disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathleen F Mittendorf
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 N. Interstate Ave, Portland, OR 97227, USA.
| | - Tia L Kauffman
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 N. Interstate Ave, Portland, OR 97227, USA.
| | - Laura M Amendola
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Genetics, University of Washington Medical Center, 1705 NE Pacific St., Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | | | | | - Michael O Dorschner
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Genetics, University of Washington Medical Center, 1705 NE Pacific St., Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Devan M Duenas
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Research Institute and Hospital, 1900 9(th) Ave, M/S JMB-6, Seattle, WA 98101, USA
| | - Donna J Eubanks
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 N Interstate Ave, Portland, OR 97227, USA
| | - Heather Spencer Feigelson
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, 2550 S Parker Rd, Suite 200, Aurora, CO 80014, USA
| | - Marian J Gilmore
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 N. Interstate Ave, Portland, OR 97227, USA
| | - Jessica Ezzell Hunter
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 N. Interstate Ave, Portland, OR 97227, USA
| | - Galen Joseph
- Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, 1450 3rd Street, Rm 551 & 556, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Stephanie A Kraft
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Research Institute and Hospital, 1900 9(th) Ave, M/S JMB-6, Seattle, WA 98101, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Division of Bioethics and Palliative Care, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Sandra Soo Jin Lee
- Division of Ethics, Department of Medical Humanities and Ethics, Columbia University, 630 West 168(th) St, PH15E-1525, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Michael C Leo
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 N Interstate Ave, Portland, OR 97227, USA
| | - Elizabeth G Liles
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 N Interstate Ave, Portland, OR 97227, USA
| | - Nangel M Lindberg
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 N Interstate Ave, Portland, OR 97227, USA
| | - Kristin R Muessig
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 N. Interstate Ave, Portland, OR 97227, USA
| | - Sonia Okuyama
- Denver Health and Hospital Authority, 777 Bannock Denver, CO 80204, USA
| | - Kathryn M Porter
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Research Institute and Hospital, 1900 9(th) Ave, M/S JMB-6, Seattle, WA 98101, USA
| | - Leslie S Riddle
- Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, 1450 3rd Street, Rm 551 & 556, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Bradley A Rolf
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Genetics, University of Washington Medical Center, 1705 NE Pacific St., Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Alan F Rope
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 N Interstate Ave, Portland, OR 97227, USA; Genome Medical, 701 Gateway Blvd, Suite 380, San Francisco, CA 94080, USA
| | - Jamilyn M Zepp
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 N. Interstate Ave, Portland, OR 97227, USA
| | - Gail P Jarvik
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Genetics, University of Washington Medical Center, 1705 NE Pacific St., Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Benjamin S Wilfond
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Research Institute and Hospital, 1900 9(th) Ave, M/S JMB-6, Seattle, WA 98101, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Division of Bioethics and Palliative Care, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Katrina A B Goddard
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 N. Interstate Ave, Portland, OR 97227, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Razzaghi H, Meghani M, Pingali C, Crane B, Naleway A, Weintraub E, Kenigsberg TA, Lamias MJ, Irving SA, Kauffman TL, Vesco KK, Daley MF, DeSilva M, Donahue J, Getahun D, Glenn S, Hambidge SJ, Jackson L, Lipkind HS, Nelson J, Zerbo O, Oduyebo T, Singleton JA, Patel SA. COVID-19 Vaccination Coverage Among Pregnant Women During Pregnancy - Eight Integrated Health Care Organizations, United States, December 14, 2020-May 8, 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2021; 70:895-899. [PMID: 34138834 PMCID: PMC8220952 DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7024e2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 118] [Impact Index Per Article: 39.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
COVID-19 vaccines are critical for ending the COVID-19 pandemic; however, current data about vaccination coverage and safety in pregnant women are limited. Pregnant women are at increased risk for severe illness and death from COVID-19 compared with nonpregnant women of reproductive age, and are at risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes, such as preterm birth (1-4). Pregnant women are eligible for and can receive any of the three COVID-19 vaccines available in the United States via Emergency Use Authorization.* Data from Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), a collaboration between CDC and multiple integrated health systems, were analyzed to assess receipt of ≥1 dose (first or second dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna vaccines or a single dose of the Janssen [Johnson & Johnson] vaccine) of any COVID-19 vaccine during pregnancy, receipt of first dose of a 2-dose COVID-19 vaccine (initiation), or completion of a 1- or 2-dose COVID-19 vaccination series. During December 14, 2020-May 8, 2021, a total of 135,968 pregnant women were identified, 22,197 (16.3%) of whom had received ≥1 dose of a vaccine during pregnancy. Among these 135,968 women, 7,154 (5.3%) had initiated and 15,043 (11.1%) had completed vaccination during pregnancy. Receipt of ≥1 dose of COVID-19 vaccine during pregnancy was highest among women aged 35-49 years (22.7%) and lowest among those aged 18-24 years (5.5%), and higher among non-Hispanic Asian (Asian) (24.7%) and non-Hispanic White (White) women (19.7%) than among Hispanic (11.9%) and non-Hispanic Black (Black) women (6.0%). Vaccination coverage increased among all racial and ethnic groups over the analytic period, likely because of increased eligibility for vaccination† and increased availability of vaccine over time. These findings indicate the need for improved outreach to and engagement with pregnant women, especially those from racial and ethnic minority groups who might be at higher risk for severe health outcomes because of COVID-19 (4). In addition, providing accurate and timely information about COVID-19 vaccination to health care providers, pregnant women, and women of reproductive age can improve vaccine confidence and coverage by ensuring optimal shared clinical decision-making.
Collapse
|
26
|
Riddle L, Amendola LM, Gilmore MJ, Guerra C, Biesecker B, Kauffman TL, Anderson K, Rope AF, Leo MC, Caruncho M, Jarvik GP, Wilfond B, Goddard KAB, Joseph G. Development and early implementation of an Accessible, Relational, Inclusive and Actionable approach to genetic counseling: The ARIA model. Patient Educ Couns 2021; 104:969-978. [PMID: 33549385 PMCID: PMC8881934 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.12.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2020] [Revised: 12/07/2020] [Accepted: 12/21/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the training and early implementation of the ARIA model of genetic counseling (Accessible, Relational, Inclusive, Actionable). METHODS As part of the Cancer Health Assessments Reaching Many (CHARM) study, an interdisciplinary workgroup developed the ARIA curriculum and trained genetic counselors to return exome sequencing results using the ARIA model. CURRICULUM The ARIA curriculum includes didactic elements, discussion, readings, role plays, and observations of usual care genetic counseling sessions. The ARIA model provides the skills and strategies needed for genetic counseling to be accessible to all patients, regardless of prior knowledge or literacy level; involves appropriate psychological and social counseling without overwhelming the patient with information; and leaves the patient with clear and actionable next steps. CONCLUSION With sufficient training and practice, the ARIA model appears to be feasible, with promise for ensuring that genetic counselors' communication is accessible, relational, inclusive and actionable for the diverse patients participating in genomic medicine. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS ARIA offers a coherent set of principles and strategies for effective communication with patients of all literacy levels and outlines specific techniques to practice and incorporate these skills into routine practice. The ARIA model could be integrated into genetic counseling training programs and practice, making genetic counseling more accessible and meaningful for all patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leslie Riddle
- Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, 1450 3rd St., San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| | - Laura M Amendola
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, 1705 NE Pacific St. Box 357720, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Marian J Gilmore
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 N. Interstate Ave., Portland, OR 97227, USA
| | - Claudia Guerra
- Department of General Internal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, 1450 3rd St. Box 0128, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| | | | - Tia L Kauffman
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 N. Interstate Ave., Portland, OR 97227, USA
| | - Katherine Anderson
- Denver Health and Hospital Authority, MC 3150, 777 Bannock, Denver, CO 80204, USA
| | - Alan F Rope
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 N. Interstate Ave., Portland, OR 97227, USA
| | - Michael C Leo
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 N. Interstate Ave., Portland, OR 97227, USA
| | - Mikaella Caruncho
- Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, 1450 3rd St., San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| | - Gail P Jarvik
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, 1705 NE Pacific St. Box 357720, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Benjamin Wilfond
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute, M/S JMB-6, 1900 Ninth Ave., Seattle, WA 98101, USA
| | - Katrina A B Goddard
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 N. Interstate Ave., Portland, OR 97227, USA
| | - Galen Joseph
- Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, 1450 3rd St., San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Freed AS, Gruß I, McMullen CK, Leo MC, Kauffman TL, Porter KM, Muessig KR, Eubanks D, Goddard KAB, Wilfond BS, Liles EG. A decision aid for additional findings in genomic sequencing: Development and pilot testing. Patient Educ Couns 2021; 104:960-968. [PMID: 33191058 PMCID: PMC8099937 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.10.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2020] [Revised: 08/29/2020] [Accepted: 10/31/2020] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the development of a web-based, patient-facing decision aid to support patients and research participants to make an informed, values-based decision about whether to receive additional results from genomic sequencing. METHODS We developed the decision aid following the multi-step process described in the International Patient Decision Aids Standards. This utilized literature review, focus groups, and alpha testing with research participants undergoing clinical genomic sequencing. RESULTS The decision aid, the Optional Results Choice Aid (ORCA), includes a seven-question "values clarification exercise," illustrative patient quotes, and summative guidance for the user. The decision aid was found to be highly readable, acceptable and relevant in alpha testing. CONCLUSION We developed a decision aid to support informed, values-based decision making for patients and research participants considering whether to receive additional results from genomic sequencing. ORCA is being implemented in the NHGRI-funded Cancer Health Assessment Reaching Many (CHARM) study, where we are measuring informed values-choice congruence. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS ORCA was designed to support patients and research participants to make an informed, values-based decision about whether to receive additional results from genomic sequencing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda S Freed
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Genetics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, USA
| | - Inga Gruß
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, USA
| | - Carmit K McMullen
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, USA
| | - Michael C Leo
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, USA
| | - Tia L Kauffman
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, USA
| | - Kathryn M Porter
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Bioethics and Palliative Care, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, USA
| | - Kristin R Muessig
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, USA
| | - Donna Eubanks
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, USA
| | - Katrina A B Goddard
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, USA
| | - Benjamin S Wilfond
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute, Seattle, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Division of Bioethics and Palliative Care, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, USA
| | - Elizabeth G Liles
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, USA; Northwest Permanente, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Mittendorf KF, Ukaegbu C, Gilmore MJ, Lindberg NM, Kauffman TL, Eubanks DJ, Shuster E, Allen J, McMullen C, Feigelson HS, Anderson KP, Leo MC, Hunter JE, Sasaki SO, Zepp JM, Syngal S, Wilfond BS, Goddard KAB. Adaptation and early implementation of the PREdiction model for gene mutations (PREMM 5™) for lynch syndrome risk assessment in a diverse population. Fam Cancer 2021; 21:167-180. [PMID: 33754278 PMCID: PMC8458476 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-021-00243-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2020] [Accepted: 03/04/2021] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
Lynch syndrome (LS) is the most common inherited cause of colorectal and endometrial cancers. Identifying individuals at risk for LS without personal cancer history requires detailed collection and assessment of family health history. However, barriers exist to family health history collection, especially in historically underserved populations. To improve LS risk assessment in historically underserved populations, we adapted the provider-facing PREdiction Model for gene Mutations (PREMM5™ model), a validated LS risk assessment model, into a patient-facing electronic application through an iterative development process involving expert and patient stakeholders. We report on preliminary findings based on the first 500 individuals exposed to the adapted application in a primary care population enriched for low-literacy and low-resource patients. Major adaptations to the PREMM5™ provider module included reduction in reading level, addition of interactive literacy aids, incorporation of family history assessment for both maternal and paternal sides of the family, and inclusion of questions about individual relatives or small groups of relatives to reduce cognitive burden. In the first 500 individuals, 90% completed the PREMM5™ independently; of those, 94% did so in 5 min or less (ranged from 0.2 to 48.8 min). The patient-facing application was able to accurately classify 84% of patients as having clinically significant or not clinically significant LS risk. Our preliminary results suggest that in this diverse study population, most participants were able to rapidly, accurately, and independently complete an interactive application collecting family health history assessment that accurately assessed for Lynch syndrome risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathleen F Mittendorf
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA.
| | - Chinedu Ukaegbu
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Marian J Gilmore
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Nangel M Lindberg
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Tia L Kauffman
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Donna J Eubanks
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Elizabeth Shuster
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Jake Allen
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Carmit McMullen
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| | | | | | - Michael C Leo
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Jessica Ezzell Hunter
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| | | | - Jamilyn M Zepp
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Sapna Syngal
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Benjamin S Wilfond
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Research Institute and Hospital, Seattle, WA, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Katrina A B Goddard
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Kraft SA, Porter KM, Duenas DM, Guerra C, Joseph G, Lee SSJ, Shipman KJ, Allen J, Eubanks D, Kauffman TL, Lindberg NM, Anderson K, Zepp JM, Gilmore MJ, Mittendorf KF, Shuster E, Muessig KR, Arnold B, Goddard KAB, Wilfond BS. Participant Reactions to a Literacy-Focused, Web-Based Informed Consent Approach for a Genomic Implementation Study. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2021; 12:1-11. [PMID: 32981477 PMCID: PMC7785634 DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2020.1823907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical genomic implementation studies pose challenges for informed consent. Consent forms often include complex language and concepts, which can be a barrier to diverse enrollment, and these studies often blur traditional research-clinical boundaries. There is a move toward self-directed, web-based research enrollment, but more evidence is needed about how these enrollment approaches work in practice. In this study, we developed and evaluated a literacy-focused, web-based consent approach to support enrollment of diverse participants in an ongoing clinical genomic implementation study. Methods: As part of the Cancer Health Assessments Reaching Many (CHARM) study, we developed a web-based consent approach that featured plain language, multimedia, and separate descriptions of clinical care and research activities. CHARM offered clinical exome sequencing to individuals at high risk of hereditary cancer. We interviewed CHARM participants about their reactions to the consent approach. We audio recorded, transcribed, and coded interviews using a deductively and inductively derived codebook. We reviewed coded excerpts as a team to identify overarching themes. Results: We conducted 32 interviews, including 12 (38%) in Spanish. Most (69%) enrolled without assistance from study staff, usually on a mobile phone. Those who completed enrollment in one day spent an average of 12 minutes on the consent portion. Interviewees found the information simple to read but comprehensive, were neutral to positive about the multimedia support, and identified increased access to testing in the study as the key difference from clinical care. Conclusions: This study showed that interviewees found our literacy-focused, web-based consent approach acceptable; did not distinguish the consent materials from other online study processes; and valued getting access to testing in the study. Overall, conducting empirical bioethics research in an ongoing clinical trial was useful to demonstrate the acceptability of our novel consent approach but posed practical challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie A Kraft
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute, and Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Kathryn M Porter
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Devan M Duenas
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Claudia Guerra
- Department of Anthropology, History and Social Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Galen Joseph
- Department of Anthropology, History and Social Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Sandra Soo-Jin Lee
- Division of Ethics, Department of Medical Humanities and Ethics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kelly J Shipman
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Jake Allen
- IT (Information Technology) Department, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Donna Eubanks
- IT (Information Technology) Department, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Tia L Kauffman
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Nangel M Lindberg
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | | | - Jamilyn M Zepp
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Marian J Gilmore
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Kathleen F Mittendorf
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Elizabeth Shuster
- Research Data and Analysis Center, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Kristin R Muessig
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Briana Arnold
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Katrina A B Goddard
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Benjamin S Wilfond
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute, and Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Riddle L, Amendola LM, Gilmore MJ, Rolf B, Zepp J, Guerra C, Biesecker B, Caruncho M, Anderson KP, Rope AF, Kauffman TL, Lewis H, Kraft SA, Duenas DM, Wilfond B, Goddard KA, Joseph G. Abstract PO-050: Reducing disparities in genomic medicine using a literacy-focused genetic counseling model for cancer risk assessment. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7755.disp20-po-050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Genetic and genomic testing is reaching more people than ever, yet disparities in access to and application of hereditary cancer screening remain. Further, with the advent of lower cost sequencing, the amount and complexity of information that is conveyed to patients, including secondary results, has increased. As part of the Clinical Sequencing Evidence-Generating Research (CSER) consortium, the Cancer Health Assessments Reaching Many (CHARM) study implemented a hereditary cancer risk assessment program for healthy adults aged 18-49. Participants were recruited in English and Spanish from two primary care settings (Kaiser Permanente Northwest and Denver Health). Participants underwent clinical exome sequencing and were randomized to receive their test results via usual care or a “literacy-focused” genetic counseling approach (n=845). Genetic counselors in the literacy- focused arm received in-depth training to adapt and apply evidence-based methods for effective communication with individuals of all literacy levels. We hypothesized that the literacy-focused approach would be non-inferior to usual care genetic counseling and generate higher satisfaction, engagement, and understanding of and adherence to recommended care. We also collected qualitative data to explore the experience of receiving exome sequencing results in this setting. Here, we present findings from qualitative interviews with participants conducted within a month (n=35) and again at 6 months (n=15) after receiving results, including: pathogenic cancer risk variants, medically actionable secondary findings and carrier results; variants of uncertain significant (VUS) in cancer genes; and negative results. The mean age of participants was 33. 72% spoke English and 75% were considered medically underserved by CHARM criteria. Participants in both trial arms expressed overall satisfaction; however, some participants in the literacy-focused arm indicated that specific elements of the approach, such as teach-back and plain language, helped facilitate their understanding, while some in the usual care arm said the information was overly technical. Younger participants in both arms, whose sequencing results will not be clinically actionable for many years, reported less worry and recalled fewer details about their results than older participants. While participants recognized the utility of positive results for family, at six months only some had spoken with them about testing, and few relatives had undergone cascade testing offered by CHARM. Genomic medicine requires clear communication of disease risk and prevention recommendations. Our qualitative findings suggest that the literacy-focused approach to genetic counseling can help facilitate patient understanding of cancer and other genomic risk. These results can guide effective disclosure of sequencing results and have implications for training clinical genetics professionals in the provision of equitable care for diverse patients.
Citation Format: Leslie Riddle, Laura M. Amendola, Marian J. Gilmore, Brad Rolf, Jamilyn Zepp, Claudia Guerra, Barbara Biesecker, Mikaella Caruncho, Katherine P. Anderson, Alan F. Rope, Tia L. Kauffman, Hannah Lewis, Stephanie A. Kraft, Devan M. Duenas, Benjamin Wilfond, Katrina A.B. Goddard, Galen Joseph. Reducing disparities in genomic medicine using a literacy-focused genetic counseling model for cancer risk assessment [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Virtual Conference: Thirteenth AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2020 Oct 2-4. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020;29(12 Suppl):Abstract nr PO-050.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leslie Riddle
- 1University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA,
| | | | | | - Brad Rolf
- 2University of Washington, Seattle, WA,
| | - Jamilyn Zepp
- 3Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR,
| | - Claudia Guerra
- 1University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA,
| | | | | | | | | | - Tia L. Kauffman
- 3Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR,
| | - Hannah Lewis
- 7Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA
| | | | | | | | | | - Galen Joseph
- 1University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA,
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Feigelson HS, Mittendorf KF, Kauffman TL, Anderson K, Okuyama S, Wilfond B, Jarvik GP, Amendola LM, McMullen C, Lynch F, Eubanks D, Shuster E, Allen J, Kraft SA, Joseph G, Lee SSJ, Goddard KA. Abstract PR02: Using web-based tools to assess familial cancer risk in diverse populations. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7755.modpop19-pr02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction: The Cancer Health Risk Assessments Reaching Many (CHARM) study (NCT03426878) aims to increase access to genetic testing for hereditary cancer in low-income, low-literacy, and minority populations (hereafter referred to as “underserved”). To implement the study, we have capitalized on the availability of electronic medical record (EMR) systems, developed innovative web-based tools, and designed a novel telemedicine protocol for return of clinical genetic testing results.
Methods: Patients aged 18-49 years are recruited from two centers: Kaiser Permanente Northwest (KPNW; an integrated health care system in Portland, OR) and Denver Health (DH; a federally qualified health care center in Denver, CO). Specific protocols were developed to identify potentially eligible patients from the EMR and invite them to complete a web-based family history assessment. KPNW patients were recruited using email, text messaging, and in-clinic booths; DH patients were recruited via mail, phone, and provider referral. Validated risk assessment tools for Lynch syndrome (PREMM5) and heredity breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (B-RST) were adapted for our low-literacy and bilingual (English and Spanish) target population. Genetic testing is offered to patients with greater than average risk for hereditary cancer, or where risk cannot be assessed because of unknown family history or limited family structure. Eligible patients review a multipart, multimedia online consent. Those who consent to participate provide a saliva sample for clinical exome sequencing. Genetic counselors return results by telephone using traditional (usual care active comparator) or modified, communication-focused (experimental) counseling for pathogenic variants, likely pathogenic variants, and select variants of uncertain significance in 39 genes related to cancer risk, pathogenic variants in 79 genes related to medically actionable secondary findings, and 14 genes related to carrier status.
Results: In the first four months of recruitment, 258 patients have completed the risk assessment tool (48% are underserved). Of those, 180 (70%) had greater than average risk of hereditary cancer (or limited family history information) and were invited to participate (53% were underserved); 86% of underserved patients and 78% of patients who do not meet criteria for the underserved category have consented. The vast majority of participants complete enrollment without assistance from study staff, and in-person visits are not required for participation. Telephone genetic test result disclosure will begin in December 2018.
Conclusions: We have successfully developed online tools for cancer risk assessment that are accessible to underserved and low-literacy populations. These tools may be a cost-effective approach for improving the capture of family history data in the EMR. It does not require a provider to gather the information and the patient gets immediate feedback on results of the risk assessment and appropriate next steps.
This abstract is also being presented as Poster A37.
Citation Format: Heather Spencer Feigelson, Kathleen F. Mittendorf, Tia L. Kauffman, Katherine Anderson, Sonia Okuyama, Benjamin Wilfond, Gail P. Jarvik, Laura M. Amendola, Carmit McMullen, Fances Lynch, Donna Eubanks, Elizabeth Shuster, Jake Allen, Stephanie A. Kraft, Galen Joseph, Sandra Soo-Jin Lee, Katrina A.B. Goddard. Using web-based tools to assess familial cancer risk in diverse populations [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Modernizing Population Sciences in the Digital Age; 2019 Feb 19-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020;29(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PR02.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Tia L. Kauffman
- 2Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR,
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Carmit McMullen
- 2Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR,
| | - Fances Lynch
- 2Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR,
| | - Donna Eubanks
- 2Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR,
| | | | - Jake Allen
- 2Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR,
| | | | - Galen Joseph
- 6University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA,
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Kraft SA, McMullen C, Lindberg NM, Bui D, Shipman K, Anderson K, Joseph G, Duenas DM, Porter KM, Kauffman TL, Koomas A, Ransom CL, Jackson P, Goddard KAB, Wilfond BS, Lee SSJ. Integrating stakeholder feedback in translational genomics research: an ethnographic analysis of a study protocol's evolution. Genet Med 2020; 22:1094-1101. [PMID: 32089547 PMCID: PMC7275883 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-020-0763-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2019] [Revised: 02/04/2020] [Accepted: 02/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study describes challenges faced while incorporating sometimes conflicting stakeholder feedback into study design and development of patient-facing materials for a translational genomics study aiming to reduce health disparities among diverse populations. METHODS We conducted an ethnographic analysis of study documents including summaries of patient advisory committee meetings and interviews, reflective field notes written by study team members, and correspondence with our institutional review board (IRB). Through this analysis, we identified cross-cutting challenges for incorporating stakeholder feedback into development of our recruitment, risk assessment, and informed consent processes and materials. RESULTS Our analysis revealed three key challenges: (1) balancing precision and simplicity in the design of study materials, (2) providing clinical care within the research context, and (3) emphasizing potential study benefits versus risks and limitations. CONCLUSIONS While involving patient stakeholders in study design and materials development can increase inclusivity and responsiveness to patient needs, patient feedback may conflict with that of content area experts on the research team and IRBs who are tasked with overseeing the research. Our analysis highlights the need for further empirical research about ethical challenges when incorporating patient feedback into study design, and for dialogue with genomic researchers and IRB representatives about these issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie A Kraft
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | - Carmit McMullen
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Nangel M Lindberg
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| | - David Bui
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Kelly Shipman
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Galen Joseph
- Department of Anthropology, History & Social Medicine, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Devan M Duenas
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Kathryn M Porter
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Tia L Kauffman
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Alyssa Koomas
- Alliance for a Healthier Generation, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Chelese L Ransom
- CHARM English-Speaking Patient Advisory Committee, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Paige Jackson
- CHARM English-Speaking Patient Advisory Committee, Denver, CO, USA
| | | | - Benjamin S Wilfond
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Sandra Soo-Jin Lee
- Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Avalos LA, Ferber J, Zerbo O, Naleway AL, Bulkley J, Thompson M, Cragan J, Williams J, Odouli R, Kauffman TL, Ball S, Shifflett P, Li DK. Trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV3) during pregnancy and six-month infant development. Vaccine 2020; 38:2326-2332. [PMID: 32033850 PMCID: PMC7309563 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.01.059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2019] [Revised: 01/16/2020] [Accepted: 01/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Despite recommendations by professional organizations that all pregnant women receive inactivated influenza vaccine, safety concerns remain a barrier. Our objective was to assess the effect of trivalent influenza vaccines (IIV3) during pregnancy on parent report 6-month infant development. METHODS We conducted a multi-site prospective birth cohort study during the 2010-2011 influenza season and followed pregnant women and their newborns through 6 months of age. Information on IIV3 during pregnancy was ascertained from the EHR and self-report. The Ages and Stages Questionnaire-3 (ASQ-3) was completed by the mother to assess 6-month infant neurodevelopment in five domains (communication, gross motor, fine motor, problem-solving, and personal adaptive skills). Scores for each domain above the cut-off point indicating typical development were categorized as "on schedule" while scores in the zones indicating the need for either monitoring or further assessment were categorized as "not on schedule". Multivariable logistic regression was conducted. RESULTS Of the 1225 infant-mother pairs, 65% received IIV3 during pregnancy. In bivariate analysis, infants of women who received IIV3 during pregnancy were moderately-less likely to need monitoring or further assessment in the personal social domain compared with infants of unvaccinated women (10.0% vs. 14.1%, p = 0.033; crude OR (cOR): 0.68(95%CI:0.48,0.97)). However, after controlling for potential confounders, the findings were no longer statistically significant (aOR:0.72,95%CI: 0.49,1.06,p = 0.46). No significant unadjusted or adjusted associations emerged in any other ASQ-3 domain. CONCLUSION There was no significant association between IIV3 exposure during pregnancy and 6-month infant development. Studies of IIV3 during pregnancy to assess longer-term developmental outcomes are indicated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lyndsay A Avalos
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, United States.
| | - Jeannette Ferber
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, United States
| | - Ousseny Zerbo
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, United States
| | - Allison L Naleway
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, United States
| | - Joanna Bulkley
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, United States
| | - Mark Thompson
- Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Janet Cragan
- National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Jennifer Williams
- National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Roxana Odouli
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, United States
| | - Tia L Kauffman
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, United States
| | - Sarah Ball
- Abt Associates, Cambridge, MA, United States
| | | | - De-Kun Li
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Mittendorf KF, Hunter JE, Schneider JL, Shuster E, Rope AF, Zepp J, Gilmore MJ, Muessig KR, Davis JV, Kauffman TL, Bergen KM, Wiesner GL, Acheson LS, Peterson SK, Syngal S, Reiss JA, Goddard KAB. Recommended care and care adherence following a diagnosis of Lynch syndrome: a mixed-methods study. Hered Cancer Clin Pract 2019; 17:31. [PMID: 31890059 PMCID: PMC6915941 DOI: 10.1186/s13053-019-0130-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2019] [Accepted: 11/28/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lynch syndrome (LS) is the most common hereditary colorectal cancer (CRC) syndrome. This study assesses trends in diagnosis of LS and adherence to recommended LS-related care in a large integrated healthcare organization (~ 575,000 members). METHODS Electronic medical record (EMR) data (1999-2015) were examined to identify patients with a diagnosis of LS. We examined their LS-associated care recommendations and adherence to these recommendations. Qualitative patient and provider interviews were conducted with the aim of identifying opportunities for improved care delivery. RESULTS We identified 74 patients with a diagnosis of LS; 64% were diagnosed with a LS-related malignancy prior to their diagnosis of LS. The time to LS diagnosis following development of a LS-related cancer decreased over time: before 2009 11% of individuals received a diagnosis of LS within 1 year of developing a LS-related cancer compared to 83% after 2009 (p < 0.0001). Colonoscopy recommendations were documented in the EMR for almost all patients with LS (96%). Documentation of other recommendations for cancer surveillance was less commonly found. Overall, patient adherence to colonoscopy was high (M = 81.5%; SD = 32.7%), and adherence to other recommendations varied. To improve care coordination, patients and providers suggested providing automated reminder prompts for LS-related surveillance, adding a LS-specific diagnosis code, and providing guidelines for LS-related surveillance in the EMR. CONCLUSIONS We identified fewer than expected patients with LS in our large care system, indicating that there is still a diagnostic care gap. However, patients with LS were likely to receive and follow CRC surveillance recommendations. Recommendations for and adherence to extracolonic surveillance were variable. Improved care coordination and clearer documentation of the LS diagnosis is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathleen F. Mittendorf
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 N. Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR 97227 USA
| | - Jessica Ezzell Hunter
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 N. Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR 97227 USA
| | - Jennifer L. Schneider
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 N. Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR 97227 USA
| | - Elizabeth Shuster
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 N. Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR 97227 USA
| | - Alan F. Rope
- Northwest Permanente, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR USA
| | - Jamilyn Zepp
- Department of Medical Genetics, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR USA
| | - Marian J. Gilmore
- Department of Medical Genetics, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR USA
| | - Kristin R. Muessig
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 N. Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR 97227 USA
| | - James V. Davis
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 N. Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR 97227 USA
| | - Tia L. Kauffman
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 N. Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR 97227 USA
| | - Kellene M. Bergen
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 N. Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR 97227 USA
| | - Georgia L. Wiesner
- Vanderbilt Hereditary Cancer Program, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN USA
| | - Louise S. Acheson
- Case Western Reserve University, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH USA
| | | | - Sapna Syngal
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | - Jacob A. Reiss
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 N. Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR 97227 USA
| | - Katrina A. B. Goddard
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 N. Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR 97227 USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Yu JH, Appelbaum PS, Brothers KB, Joffe S, Kauffman TL, Koenig BA, Prince AE, Scollon S, Wolf SM, Bernhardt BA, Wilfond BS. Consent for clinical genome sequencing: considerations from the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium. Per Med 2019; 16:325-333. [PMID: 31313633 DOI: 10.2217/pme-2018-0076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Implementing genome and exome sequencing in clinical practice presents challenges, including obtaining meaningful informed consent. Consent may be challenging due to test limitations such as uncertainties associated with test results and interpretation, complexity created by the potential for additional findings and high patient expectations. We drew on the experiences of research teams within the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research (CSER1) Consortium on informed consent for clinical genome and exome sequencing (CGES) to negotiate consensus considerations. We present six considerations for clinicians and 12 key points to communicate as they support patients in deciding whether to undergo CGES. These considerations and key points provide a helpful starting point for informed consent to CGES, grounded in the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research (CSER1) experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joon-Ho Yu
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.,Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Hospital & Research Institute, Seattle, WA 98101, USA
| | - Paul S Appelbaum
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Medical Center, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Kyle B Brothers
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA
| | - Steven Joffe
- Department of Medical Ethics & Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, PA 19104, USA
| | - Tia L Kauffman
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR 97227, USA
| | - Barbara A Koenig
- Program in Bioethics, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Anya Er Prince
- College of Law, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
| | - Sarah Scollon
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Susan M Wolf
- Law School; Medical School; Consortium on Law & Values in Health, Environment & the Life Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
| | - Barbara A Bernhardt
- Division of Translational Medicine & Human Genetics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Benjamin S Wilfond
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.,Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Hospital & Research Institute, Seattle, WA 98101, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Thompson MG, Li DK, Naleway AL, Ferber JR, Henninger ML, Shifflett P, Sokolow LZ, Odouli R, Kauffman TL, Fink RV, Bulkley J, Cragan JD, Bozeman S. Factors associated with recruitment, surveillance participation, and retention in an observational study of pregnant women and influenza. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2019; 19:161. [PMID: 31068160 PMCID: PMC6507168 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-019-2280-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2017] [Accepted: 04/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background This report describes the results of recruitment efforts and the subsequent participation of pregnant women in study activities in a 2010–2012 observational study focused on influenza illness and vaccination in California and Oregon, USA. Methods Socio-demographic and health characteristics extracted from electronic medical records were compared among pregnant women who enrolled in the study, refused to participate, or were never reached for study invitation. These characteristics plus additional self-reported information were compared between women who enrolled in two study tracks: a prospective cohort vs. women enrolled following an acute respiratory illness (ARI) medical encounter. The characteristics of women who participated in weekly ARI surveillance (cohort enrollees, year one) and a 6-month follow-up interview (all enrollees) were also examined. Results In year one, we reached 51% (6938/13,655) of the potential participants we tried to contact by telephone, and 20% (1374/6938) of the women we invited agreed to join the prospective cohort. Women with chronic medical conditions, pregnancy complications, and medical encounters for ARI (prior to pregnancy or during the study period) were more likely to be reached for recruitment and more likely to enroll in the cohort. Twenty percent of cohort enrollees never started weekly surveillance reports; among those who did, reports were completed for 55% of the surveillance weeks. Receipt of the influenza vaccine was higher among women who joined the cohort (76%) than those who refused (56%) or were never reached (54%). In contrast, vaccine uptake among medical enrollees in year one (54%; 53/98) and two (52%; 79/151) was similar to other pregnant women in those years. Study site, white race, non-Hispanic ethnicity, and not having a child aged < 13 years at home were most consistently associated with joining as a cohort or medical enrollee and completing study activities after joining. Conclusions We observed systematic differences in socio-demographic and health characteristics across different levels of participant engagement and between cohort and medical enrollees. More methodological research and innovation in conducting prospective observational studies in this population are needed, especially when extended participant engagement and ongoing surveillance are required. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-019-2280-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark G Thompson
- Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, USA.
| | - De-Kun Li
- Division of Research, Kaiser Foundation Research Institute, Oakland, CA, USA.,Department of Health Research and Policy, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Allison L Naleway
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Jeannette R Ferber
- Division of Research, Kaiser Foundation Research Institute, Oakland, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Leslie Z Sokolow
- Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, USA.,Battelle Memorial Institute, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Roxana Odouli
- Division of Research, Kaiser Foundation Research Institute, Oakland, CA, USA
| | - Tia L Kauffman
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| | | | - Joanna Bulkley
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Janet D Cragan
- National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, CDC, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Clarke EV, Muessig KR, Zepp J, Hunter JE, Syngal S, Acheson LS, Wiesner GL, Peterson SK, Bergen KM, Shuster E, Davis JV, Schneider JL, Kauffman TL, Gilmore MJ, Reiss JA, Rope AF, Cook JE, Goddard KAB. Implementation of a Systematic Tumor Screening Program for Lynch Syndrome in an Integrated Health Care Setting. Fam Cancer 2019; 18:317-325. [PMID: 30729418 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-019-00123-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
A subset of colorectal cancer (CRC) cases are attributable to Lynch syndrome (LS), a hereditary form of CRC. Effective evaluation for LS can be done on CRC tumors to guide diagnostic testing. Increased diagnosis of LS allows for surveillance and risk reduction, which can mitigate CRC-related burden and prevent cancer-related deaths. We evaluated participation in LS screening among newly diagnosed adult CRC patients. Some cases were referred for genetics evaluation prior to study recruitment (selective screening). Those not referred directly were randomized to the intervention or control (usual care) arms. Control cases were observed for one year, then given information about LS screening. Patients who declined participation were followed through the medical record. Of 601 cases of CRC, 194 (32%) enrolled in our study and were offered LS screening, 43 (7%) were followed as a control group, 148 (25%) declined participation and 216 (36%) were ineligible [63 (10%) of which received prior selective screening]. Six and nine cases of LS were identified through the intervention and selective screening groups, respectively. Overall, a higher proportion of PMS2 variants were identified in the intervention (3/6, 50%) versus selective screening groups (2/9, 22%) (not statistically significant). Eighty-eight percent and 23% of intervention and control patients, respectively, received LS screening. No control patients were found to have LS. Systems-based approaches are needed to ensure we fully identify LS cases. The proportion of LS cases from this program was 4% of newly diagnosed cases of CRC, similar to other programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth V Clarke
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 N. Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR, 97227, USA
| | - Kristin R Muessig
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 N. Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR, 97227, USA
| | - Jamilyn Zepp
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 N. Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR, 97227, USA
| | - Jessica E Hunter
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 N. Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR, 97227, USA
| | - Sapna Syngal
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Louise S Acheson
- Case Western Reserve University, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Georgia L Wiesner
- Vanderbilt Hereditary Cancer Program, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Susan K Peterson
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kellene M Bergen
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 N. Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR, 97227, USA
| | - Elizabeth Shuster
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 N. Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR, 97227, USA
| | - James V Davis
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 N. Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR, 97227, USA
| | - Jennifer L Schneider
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 N. Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR, 97227, USA
| | - Tia L Kauffman
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 N. Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR, 97227, USA
| | - Marian J Gilmore
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 N. Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR, 97227, USA
| | - Jacob A Reiss
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 N. Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR, 97227, USA
| | - Alan F Rope
- Northwest Permanente, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Jennifer E Cook
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 N. Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR, 97227, USA
| | - Katrina A B Goddard
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 N. Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR, 97227, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Hart MR, Biesecker BB, Blout CL, Christensen KD, Amendola LM, Bergstrom KL, Biswas S, Bowling KM, Brothers KB, Conlin LK, Cooper GM, Dulik MC, East KM, Everett JN, Finnila CR, Ghazani AA, Gilmore MJ, Goddard KAB, Jarvik GP, Johnston JJ, Kauffman TL, Kelley WV, Krier JB, Lewis KL, McGuire AL, McMullen C, Ou J, Plon SE, Rehm HL, Richards CS, Romasko EJ, Sagardia AM, Spinner NB, Thompson ML, Turbitt E, Vassy JL, Wilfond BS, Veenstra DL, Berg JS, Green RC, Biesecker LG, Hindorff LA. Correction: Secondary findings from clinical genomic sequencing: prevalence, patient perspectives, family history assessment, and health-care costs from a multisite study. Genet Med 2019; 21:1261-1262. [PMID: 30670880 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-019-0440-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
The originally published version of this Article contained errors in Fig. 2. The numbers below the black arrowheads were incorrect; please see incorrect Figure in associated Correction. These errors have now been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Ragan Hart
- Department of Medicine (Medical Genetics), University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. .,Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Coordinating Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | - Barbara B Biesecker
- Social and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Carrie L Blout
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kurt D Christensen
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Laura M Amendola
- Department of Medicine (Medical Genetics), University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.,Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Coordinating Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Katie L Bergstrom
- Department of Pediatrics, Oncology Section, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sawona Biswas
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Kevin M Bowling
- HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL, USA
| | - Kyle B Brothers
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Laura K Conlin
- Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The Children's Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Greg M Cooper
- HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL, USA
| | - Matthew C Dulik
- Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The Children's Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Kelly M East
- HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL, USA
| | - Jessica N Everett
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | - Arezou A Ghazani
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Marian J Gilmore
- Department of Medical Genetics, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| | | | - Gail P Jarvik
- Department of Medicine (Medical Genetics), University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.,Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Coordinating Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jennifer J Johnston
- Medical Genomics and Metabolic Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Tia L Kauffman
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| | | | - Joel B Krier
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Katie L Lewis
- Medical Genomics and Metabolic Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Amy L McGuire
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Carmit McMullen
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Jeffrey Ou
- Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Coordinating Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Sharon E Plon
- Department of Pediatrics, Oncology Section, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Heidi L Rehm
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Partners HealthCare, Cambridge, MA, USA.,Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - C Sue Richards
- Knight Diagnostic Laboratories, Oregon Health Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Edward J Romasko
- Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The Children's Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ane Miren Sagardia
- Social and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Nancy B Spinner
- Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The Children's Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Erin Turbitt
- Social and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jason L Vassy
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Benjamin S Wilfond
- Department of Pediatrics and Seattle Children's Research Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - David L Veenstra
- Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Coordinating Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.,Department of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jonathan S Berg
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Robert C Green
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.,Partners Personalized Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Leslie G Biesecker
- Medical Genomics and Metabolic Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Lucia A Hindorff
- Division of Genomic Medicine, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Rope AF, Kauffman TL, Himes P, Amendola LM, Punj S, Akkari Y, Potter A, Davis JV, Schneider JL, Reiss JA, Gilmore MJ, McMullen CK, Nickerson DA, Richards CS, Jarvik GP, Wilfond BS, Goddard KAB. A case for expanding carrier testing to include actionable X-linked disorders. Clin Case Rep 2018; 6:2092-2095. [PMID: 30455898 PMCID: PMC6230667 DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.1806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2018] [Revised: 07/27/2018] [Accepted: 08/20/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
A research study utilizing whole-genome sequence analysis for preconception carrier screening provided a genome-first detection of a severe de novo Factor VIII mutation in a woman with implications for pregnancy management and life-saving interventions of her newborn son, and a challenge to the existing paradigm regarding carrier testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan F. Rope
- Department of GeneticsKaiser Permanente NorthwestPortlandOregon
| | - Tia L. Kauffman
- Center for Health ResearchKaiser Permanente NorthwestPortlandOregon
| | - Pat Himes
- Department of GeneticsKaiser Permanente NorthwestPortlandOregon
| | - Laura M. Amendola
- Department of MedicineDivision of Medical GeneticsUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWashington
| | - Sumit Punj
- Department of Molecular and Medical GeneticsOregon Health & Science UniversityPortlandOregon
| | - Yassmine Akkari
- Department of Molecular and Medical GeneticsOregon Health & Science UniversityPortlandOregon
| | - Amiee Potter
- Department of Molecular and Medical GeneticsOregon Health & Science UniversityPortlandOregon
| | - James V. Davis
- Center for Health ResearchKaiser Permanente NorthwestPortlandOregon
| | | | - Jacob A. Reiss
- Center for Health ResearchKaiser Permanente NorthwestPortlandOregon
| | - Mari J. Gilmore
- Department of GeneticsKaiser Permanente NorthwestPortlandOregon
| | | | | | - C. Sue Richards
- Department of Molecular and Medical GeneticsOregon Health & Science UniversityPortlandOregon
| | - Gail P. Jarvik
- Department of MedicineDivision of Medical GeneticsUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWashington
- Department of Genome SciencesUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWashington
| | - Benjamin S. Wilfond
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric BioethicsSeattle Children's Hospital and Research InstituteSeattleWashington
- Divison of BioethicsDepartment of PediatricsUniversity of Washington School of MedicineSeattleWashington
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Porter KM, Kauffman TL, Koenig BA, Lewis KL, Rehm HL, Richards CS, Strande NT, Tabor HK, Wolf SM, Yang Y, Amendola LM, Azzariti DR, Berg JS, Bergstrom K, Biesecker LG, Biswas S, Bowling KM, Chung WK, Clayton EW, Conlin LK, Cooper GM, Dulik MC, Garraway LA, Ghazani AA, Green RC, Hiatt SM, Jamal SM, Jarvik GP, Goddard KAB, Wilfond BS. Approaches to carrier testing and results disclosure in translational genomics research: The clinical sequencing exploratory research consortium experience. Mol Genet Genomic Med 2018; 6:898-909. [PMID: 30133189 PMCID: PMC6305639 DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2017] [Revised: 03/23/2018] [Accepted: 06/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Clinical genome and exome sequencing (CGES) is primarily used to address specific clinical concerns by detecting risk of future disease, clarifying diagnosis, or directing treatment. Additionally, CGES makes possible the disclosure of autosomal recessive and X‐linked carrier results as additional secondary findings, and research about the impact of carrier results disclosure in this context is needed. Methods Representatives from 11 projects in the clinical sequencing exploratory research (CSER) consortium collected data from their projects using a structured survey. The survey focused on project characteristics, which variants were offered and/or disclosed to participants as carrier results, methods for carrier results disclosure, and project‐specific outcomes. We recorded quantitative responses and report descriptive statistics with the aim of describing the variability in approaches to disclosing carrier results in translational genomics research projects. Results The proportion of participants with carrier results was related to the number of genes included, ranging from 3% (three genes) to 92% (4,600 genes). Between one and seven results were disclosed to those participants who received any positive result. Most projects offered participants choices about whether to receive some or all of the carrier results. There were a range of approaches to communicate results, and many projects used separate approaches for disclosing positive and negative results. Conclusion Future translational genomics research projects will need to make decisions regarding whether and how to disclose carrier results. The CSER consortium experience identifies approaches that balance potential participant interest while limiting impact on project resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn M Porter
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington
| | - Tia L Kauffman
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon
| | - Barbara A Koenig
- Institute for Health and Aging, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Katie L Lewis
- Medical Genomics and Metabolic Genetics Branch of the National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Heidi L Rehm
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Partners Personalized Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.,Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Partners Healthcare Personalized Medicine, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Carolyn Sue Richards
- Knight Diagnostic Laboratories and Department of Molecular and Medical Genetics, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Natasha T Strande
- Department of Genetics, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Holly K Tabor
- Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Palo Alto, California
| | - Susan M Wolf
- University of Minnesota Law School, Medical School and Consortium on Law and Values in Health, Environment & the Life Sciences, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Yaping Yang
- Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Laura M Amendola
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Danielle R Azzariti
- Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Partners Healthcare Personalized Medicine, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Jonathan S Berg
- Department of Genetics, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Katie Bergstrom
- Texas Children's Cancer Center and the Department of Pediatrics, Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Leslie G Biesecker
- Medical Genomics and Metabolic Genetics Branch of the National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Sawona Biswas
- Department of Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Kevin M Bowling
- Hudson Alpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, Alabama
| | - Wendy K Chung
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University, New York, New York.,Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Ellen W Clayton
- Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Laura K Conlin
- Division of Genomic Diagnostics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Matthew C Dulik
- Division of Genomic Diagnostics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Arezou A Ghazani
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Medical Oncology and Center for Cancer Precision Medicine, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Robert C Green
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Partners Personalized Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.,Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Susan M Hiatt
- Hudson Alpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, Alabama
| | - Seema M Jamal
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Gail P Jarvik
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.,Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | | | - Benjamin S Wilfond
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Clarke EV, Schneider JL, Lynch F, Kauffman TL, Leo MC, Rosales AG, Dickerson JF, Shuster E, Wilfond BS, Goddard KAB. Assessment of willingness to pay for expanded carrier screening among women and couples undergoing preconception carrier screening. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0200139. [PMID: 30020962 PMCID: PMC6051630 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2017] [Accepted: 06/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Expanded carrier screening can provide risk information for numerous conditions. Understanding how individuals undergoing preconception expanded carrier screening value this information is important. The NextGen study evaluated the use of genome sequencing for expanded carrier screening and reporting secondary findings, and we measured participants’ willingness to pay for this approach to understand how it is valued by women and couples planning a pregnancy. Methods We assessed 277 participants’ willingness to pay for genome sequencing reporting carrier results for 728 gene/condition pairs and results for 121 secondary findings. We explored the association between attitudes and demographic factors and willingness to pay for expanded carrier screening using genome sequencing and conducted interviews with 58 of these participants to probe the reasoning behind their preferences. Results Most participants were willing to pay for expanded carrier screening using genome sequencing. Willingness to pay was associated with income level and religiosity, but not risk status for a condition in the carrier panel. Participants willing to pay nothing or a small amount cited issues around financial resources, whereas those willing to pay higher amounts were motivated by “peace of mind” from carrier results. Conclusion Women and couples planning a pregnancy value genome sequencing. The potentially high out-of-pocket cost of this service could result in healthcare disparities, since maximum amounts that participants were willing to pay were higher than a typical copay and related to income.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth V. Clarke
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Jennifer L. Schneider
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, United States of America
| | - Frances Lynch
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, United States of America
| | - Tia L. Kauffman
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, United States of America
| | - Michael C. Leo
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, United States of America
| | - Ana G. Rosales
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, United States of America
| | - John F. Dickerson
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, United States of America
| | - Elizabeth Shuster
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, United States of America
| | - Benjamin S. Wilfond
- Seattle Children’s Hospital and Research Institute, Trueman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Katrina A. B. Goddard
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Wilfond BS, Kauffman TL, Jarvik GP, Reiss JA, Richards CS, McMullen C, Gilmore M, Himes P, Kraft SA, Porter KM, Schneider JL, Punj S, Leo MC, Dickerson JF, Lynch FL, Clarke E, Rope AF, Lutz K, Goddard KAB. Lessons Learned From A Study Of Genomics-Based Carrier Screening For Reproductive Decision Making. Health Aff (Millwood) 2018; 37:809-816. [PMID: 29733724 DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Genomics-based carrier screening is one of many opportunities to use genomic information to inform medical decision making, but clinicians, health care delivery systems, and payers need to determine whether to offer screening and how to do so in an efficient, ethical way. To shed light on this issue, we conducted a study in the period 2014-17 to inform the design of clinical screening programs and guide further health services research. Many of our results have been published elsewhere; this article summarizes the lessons we learned from that study and offers policy insights. Our experience can inform understanding of the potential impact of expanded carrier screening services on health system workflows and workforces-impacts that depend on the details of the screening approach. We found limited patient or health system harms from expanded screening. We also found that some patients valued the information they learned from the process. Future policy discussions should consider the value of offering such expanded carrier screening in health delivery systems with limited resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin S Wilfond
- Benjamin S. Wilfond ( ) is director of the Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute, and of the Division of Bioethics and Palliative Care, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, all in Seattle, Washington
| | - Tia L Kauffman
- Tia L. Kauffman is a project director at the Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, in Portland, Oregon
| | - Gail P Jarvik
- Gail P. Jarvik is a professor in the Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, and in the Department of Genome Sciences, both at the University of Washington
| | - Jacob A Reiss
- Jacob A. Reiss is a medical geneticist at the Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest
| | - C Sue Richards
- C. Sue Richards is a professor in the Knight Diagnostic Laboratories, Oregon Health & Science University, in Portland
| | - Carmit McMullen
- Carmit McMullen is a senior investigator at the Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest
| | - Marian Gilmore
- Marian Gilmore is a genetic counselor in the Department of Medical Genetics at Kaiser Permanente Northwest
| | - Patricia Himes
- Patricia Himes is a genetic counselor in the Department of Medical Genetics at Kaiser Permanente Northwest
| | - Stephanie A Kraft
- Stephanie A. Kraft is an acting assistant professor in the Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute, and in the Division of Bioethics and Palliative Care, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine
| | - Kathryn M Porter
- Kathryn M. Porter is a research scientist in the Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute
| | - Jennifer L Schneider
- Jennifer L. Schneider is a research associate III at the Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest
| | - Sumit Punj
- Sumit Punj is a senior clinical scientist in the Clinical Genomics Program, GeneDx, in Gaithersburg, Maryland
| | - Michael C Leo
- Michael C. Leo is an investigator at the Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest
| | - John F Dickerson
- John F. Dickerson is an investigator at the Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest
| | - Frances L Lynch
- Frances L. Lynch is a senior investigator at the Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest
| | - Elizabeth Clarke
- Elizabeth Clarke is a research associate III at the Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest
| | - Alan F Rope
- Alan F. Rope is a staff physician at Northwest Permanente, Kaiser Permanente Northwest
| | - Kevin Lutz
- Kevin Lutz is publications manager at the Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest
| | - Katrina A B Goddard
- Katrina A. B. Goddard is associate director, research programs, at the Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Kraft SA, Schneider JL, Leo MC, Kauffman TL, Davis JV, Porter KM, McMullen CK, Wilfond BS, Goddard KAB. Patient actions and reactions after receiving negative results from expanded carrier screening. Clin Genet 2018; 93:962-971. [PMID: 29293279 DOI: 10.1111/cge.13206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2017] [Revised: 12/05/2017] [Accepted: 12/27/2017] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
With the expansion of carrier screening to general preconception and prenatal patient populations, most patients will receive negative results, which we define as indicating <25% risk of having a child with a genetic condition. Because there is limited experience with expanded carrier screening, it is important to understand how receiving negative results affects patients, especially as providers, payers, and policymakers consider whether to offer it. In this mixed-methods study, we asked preconception patients enrolled in the NextGen study about their expectations and experiences receiving negative expanded carrier screening results. Participants completed surveys at study enrollment (n = 110 women, 51 male partners), after receiving carrier results (n = 100 women, 38 male partners), after receiving secondary findings (n = 98 women, 36 male partners), and 6 months after receiving results (n = 95 women, 28 male partners). We also interviewed a subset of participants 12 to 24 months after receiving results (n = 24 women, 12 male partners). We found minimal negative emotional impact and privacy concerns, increased confidence in reproductive plans, and few changes to health behaviors, although some patients made health decisions based on misunderstandings of their results. These findings suggest that expanded carrier screening causes minimal psychosocial harms, but systems are needed to reduce the risk of misinterpreting results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S A Kraft
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.,Division of Bioethics, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - J L Schneider
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon
| | - M C Leo
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon
| | - T L Kauffman
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon
| | - J V Davis
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon
| | - K M Porter
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute, Seattle, Washington
| | - C K McMullen
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon
| | - B S Wilfond
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.,Division of Bioethics, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - K A B Goddard
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Amendola LM, Robinson JO, Hart R, Biswas S, Lee K, Bernhardt BA, East K, Gilmore MJ, Kauffman TL, Lewis KL, Roche M, Scollon S, Wynn J, Blout C. Why Patients Decline Genomic Sequencing Studies: Experiences from the CSER Consortium. J Genet Couns 2018; 27:1220-1227. [PMID: 29497922 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-018-0243-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2017] [Accepted: 02/18/2018] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Clinical and research settings are increasingly incorporating genomic sequencing (GS) technologies. Previous research has explored reasons for declining genetic testing and participation in genetic studies; however, there is a dearth of literature regarding why potential participants decline participation in GS research, and if any of these reasons are unique to GS. This knowledge is essential to promote informed decision-making and identify potential barriers to research participation and clinical implementation. We aggregated data from seven sites across the National Institutes of Health's Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research (CSER) consortium on each project's procedures for recruitment, and rates of and reasons for decline. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. The decline rate for enrollment at the seven CSER sites ranged from 12 to 64% (median 28%) and varied based on age and disease status. Projects differed in their protocols for approaching potential participants and obtaining informed consent. Reasons for declining GS research were reported for 1088 potential participants. Commonly cited reasons were similar to those reported for clinical single gene testing and non-GS genetic research. The most frequently cited reason for decline was study logistics (35%); thus, addressing logistical barriers to enrollment may positively impact GS study recruitment. Privacy and discrimination concerns were cited by 13% of decliners, highlighting the need for researchers and providers to focus educational efforts in this area. The potential psychological burden of pursuing and receiving results from GS and not wanting to receive secondary findings, a concern specific to GS, have been cited as concerns in the literature. A minority of potential participants cited psychological impact (8%) or not wanting to receive secondary findings (2%) as reasons for decline, suggesting that these concerns were not major barriers to participation in these GS studies. Further research is necessary to explore the impact, if any, of different participant groups or study protocols on rates of decline for GS studies. Future studies exploring GS implementation should consider using standardized collection methods to examine reasons for decline in larger populations and more diverse healthcare settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura M Amendola
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | - Jill O Robinson
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Ragan Hart
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Sawona Biswas
- Department of Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.,Division of Translational Medicine and Human Genetics, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Kaitlyn Lee
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Barbara A Bernhardt
- Division of Translational Medicine and Human Genetics, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Kelly East
- HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL, 35806, USA
| | - Marian J Gilmore
- Department of Medical Genetics, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, 97227, USA
| | - Tia L Kauffman
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, 97227, USA
| | - Katie L Lewis
- Medical Genomics and Metabolic Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Myra Roche
- Departments of Pediatrics and Genetics, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Sarah Scollon
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Julia Wynn
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Carrie Blout
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Kraft SA, McMullen CK, Porter KM, Kauffman TL, Davis JV, Schneider JL, Goddard KAB, Wilfond BS. Patient perspectives on the use of categories of conditions for decision making about genomic carrier screening results. Am J Med Genet A 2017; 176:376-385. [DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.38583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2017] [Revised: 11/05/2017] [Accepted: 11/28/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie A. Kraft
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric BioethicsSeattle Children's Hospital and Research InstituteSeattleWashington
- Division of BioethicsDepartment of PediatricsUniversity of Washington School of MedicineSeattleWashington
| | | | - Kathryn M. Porter
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric BioethicsSeattle Children's Hospital and Research InstituteSeattleWashington
| | - Tia L. Kauffman
- Center for Health ResearchKaiser Permanente NorthwestPortlandOregon
| | - James V. Davis
- Center for Health ResearchKaiser Permanente NorthwestPortlandOregon
| | | | | | - Benjamin S. Wilfond
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric BioethicsSeattle Children's Hospital and Research InstituteSeattleWashington
- Division of BioethicsDepartment of PediatricsUniversity of Washington School of MedicineSeattleWashington
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Kauffman TL, Irving SA, Leo MC, Gilmore MJ, Himes P, McMullen CK, Morris E, Schneider J, Wilfond BS, Goddard KAB. The NextGen Study: patient motivation for participation in genome sequencing for carrier status. Mol Genet Genomic Med 2017; 5:508-515. [PMID: 28944234 PMCID: PMC5606895 DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2017] [Revised: 05/15/2017] [Accepted: 05/22/2017] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background While translational genomic sequencing research is increasing, few studies have been limited to healthy individuals; most have focused on patients with a disease or a strong family history of a disorder. The limited studies that have included healthy individuals have focused on the disclosure of medically actionable secondary results, rather than carrier status, to assess reproductive risks. To address this important gap, we conducted the NextGen study, which focuses on carrier status and medically actionable secondary findings in a population of women planning a pregnancy. Methods We assessed 310 participants’ motivations for receiving genome sequencing for expanded carrier screening and experiences with familial genetic conditions that may relate to study participation. Results Most participants reported that obtaining general health information from genome sequencing was their primary motivator, even though they were recruited to join a study to learn more about carrier status. Forty‐two percent of enrolled women became pregnant prior to obtaining sequencing results. Conclusion Genomic carrier testing may need to be offered to women prior to active pregnancy efforts to be useful for reproductive planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tia L Kauffman
- Center for Health ResearchKaiser Permanente NorthwestPortlandOregon
| | | | - Michael C Leo
- Center for Health ResearchKaiser Permanente NorthwestPortlandOregon
| | - Marian J Gilmore
- Department of Medical GeneticsKaiser Permanente NorthwestPortlandOregon
| | - Patricia Himes
- Department of Medical GeneticsKaiser Permanente NorthwestPortlandOregon
| | | | - Elissa Morris
- Center for Health ResearchKaiser Permanente NorthwestPortlandOregon
| | | | - Benjamin S Wilfond
- Department of PediatricsTreuman Katz Center for Pediatric BioethicsSeattle Children's Hospital and Research InstituteUniversity of Washington School of MedicineSeattleWashington
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Himes P, Kauffman TL, Muessig KR, Amendola LM, Berg JS, Dorschner MO, Gilmore M, Nickerson DA, Reiss JA, Richards CS, Rope AF, Simpson DK, Wilfond BS, Jarvik GP, Goddard KA. Genome sequencing and carrier testing: decisions on categorization and whether to disclose results of carrier testing. Genet Med 2017; 19:803-808. [PMID: 28079899 PMCID: PMC5509491 DOI: 10.1038/gim.2016.198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2016] [Accepted: 10/25/2016] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We investigated the use of genome sequencing for preconception carrier testing. Genome sequencing could identify one or more of thousands of X-linked or autosomal recessive conditions that could be disclosed during preconception or prenatal counseling. Therefore, a framework that helps both clinicians and patients understand the possible range of findings is needed to respect patient preferences by ensuring that information about only the desired types of genetic conditions are provided to a given patient. METHODS We categorized gene-condition pairs into groups using a previously developed taxonomy of genetic conditions. Patients could elect to receive results from these categories. A Return of Results Committee (RORC) developed inclusion and exclusion criteria for each category. RESULTS To date, the RORC has categorized 728 gene-condition pairs: 177 are categorized as life span-limiting, 406 are categorized as serious, 93 are categorized as mild, 41 are categorized as unpredictable, and 11 are categorized as adult-onset. An additional 64 gene-condition pairs were excluded from reporting to patients or put on a watch list, generally because evidence that a gene and condition were associated was limited. CONCLUSION Categorization of gene-condition pairs using our taxonomy simplifies communication regarding patient preferences for carrier information from a genomic test.Genet Med advance online publication 12 January 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia Himes
- Department of Medical Genetics, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Tia L. Kauffman
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Kristin R. Muessig
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Laura M. Amendola
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Jonathan S. Berg
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Marian Gilmore
- Department of Medical Genetics, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Deborah A. Nickerson
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Jacob A. Reiss
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - C. Sue Richards
- Department of Molecular and Medical Genetics, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Alan F. Rope
- Northwest Permanente, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Dana K. Simpson
- Northwest Permanente, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Benjamin S. Wilfond
- Seattle Children’s Research Institute, Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Gail P. Jarvik
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Henninger ML, Irving SA, Kauffman TL, Kurosky SK, Rompala K, Thompson MG, Sokolow LZ, Avalos LA, Ball SW, Shifflett P, Naleway AL. Predictors of Breastfeeding Initiation and Maintenance in an Integrated Healthcare Setting. J Hum Lact 2017; 33:256-266. [PMID: 28418800 DOI: 10.1177/0890334417695202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends exclusive breastfeeding to age 6 months. Although breastfeeding rates in the United States have been increasing over time, further improvements are needed to meet Healthy People 2020 targets. Research aim: This study examined predictors of breastfeeding initiation and maintenance among a population of insured pregnant women. METHODS Participants were 1,149 pregnant women enrolled in the Pregnancy and Influenza Project in two Kaiser Permanente regions in 2010-2011. Data were collected through interviews at enrollment and 1 month and 6 months postpartum and through participants' electronic medical records. RESULTS Nearly all (99%) women reported initiating breastfeeding. Rates of exclusive breastfeeding were 70% and 54% at 1 month and 6 months, respectively; an additional 22% and 23% of women reported supplementing breastfeeding with formula. Of the women who supplemented, the mean ( SD) infant age at formula introduction was 53 (62) days. Of those who had stopped breastfeeding, the mean ( SD) infant age at cessation was 85 (59) days. Higher maternal education level, better maternal self-rated health, prenatal folic acid use, absence of chronic medical conditions, and infant full-term birth were significantly associated with breastfeeding maintenance. CONCLUSION Although rates of breastfeeding in this population were higher than national rates, a significant number of women stopped breastfeeding or introduced formula earlier than recommended. Two to 3 months postpartum may be a critical period warranting additional encouragement or intervention by healthcare providers. Mothers' education attainment, maternal health factors, and gestational age at delivery may predict likelihood of breastfeeding maintenance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Stephanie A Irving
- 1 Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Tia L Kauffman
- 1 Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Samantha K Kurosky
- 1 Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA.,2 RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | | | - Mark G Thompson
- 4 Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Leslie Z Sokolow
- 4 Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.,5 Battelle Memorial Institute, Brookhaven, GA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Allison L Naleway
- 1 Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Kauffman TL, Wilfond BS, Jarvik GP, Leo MC, Lynch FL, Reiss JA, Richards CS, McMullen C, Nickerson D, Dorschner MO, Goddard KAB. Design of a randomized controlled trial for genomic carrier screening in healthy patients seeking preconception genetic testing. Contemp Clin Trials 2017; 53:100-105. [PMID: 27940182 PMCID: PMC5274557 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2016.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2016] [Revised: 11/30/2016] [Accepted: 12/03/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Population-based carrier screening is limited to well-studied or high-impact genetic conditions for which the benefits may outweigh the associated harms and costs. As the cost of genome sequencing declines and availability increases, the balance of risks and benefits may change for a much larger number of genetic conditions, including medically actionable additional findings. We designed an RCT to evaluate genomic clinical sequencing for women and partners considering a pregnancy. All results are placed into the medical record for use by healthcare providers. Through quantitative and qualitative measures, including baseline and post result disclosure surveys, post result disclosure interviews, 1-2year follow-up interviews, and team journaling, we are obtaining data about the clinical and personal utility of genomic carrier screening in this population. Key outcomes include the number of reportable carrier and additional findings, and the comparative cost, utilization, and psychosocial impacts of usual care vs. genomic carrier screening. As the study progresses, we will compare the costs of genome sequencing and usual care as well as the cost of screening, pattern of use of genetic or mental health counseling services, number of outpatient visits, and total healthcare costs. This project includes novel investigation into human reactions and responses from would-be parents who are learning information that could both affect a future pregnancy and their own health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tia L Kauffman
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 North Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR 97227, USA.
| | - Benjamin S Wilfond
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, 1900 Ninth Ave, Rm 683, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA
| | - Gail P Jarvik
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Genetics, University of Washington, Box 357720, Seattle, WA 98195, USA; Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Box 357720, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Michael C Leo
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 North Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR 97227, USA
| | - Frances L Lynch
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 North Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR 97227, USA
| | - Jacob A Reiss
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 North Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR 97227, USA
| | - C Sue Richards
- Knight Diagnostic Laboratories, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail Code MP350, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
| | - Carmit McMullen
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 North Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR 97227, USA
| | - Deborah Nickerson
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Box 357720, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Michael O Dorschner
- Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Box 357655, 1959 NE Pacific St., Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Katrina A B Goddard
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 North Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR 97227, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Korngiebel DM, McMullen CK, Amendola LM, Berg JS, Davis JV, Gilmore MJ, Harding CO, Himes P, Jarvik GP, Kauffman TL, Kennedy KA, Simpson DK, Leo MC, Lynch FL, Quigley DI, Reiss JA, Richards CS, Rope AF, Schneider JL, Goddard KAB, Wilfond BS. Generating a taxonomy for genetic conditions relevant to reproductive planning. Am J Med Genet A 2016; 170:565-73. [PMID: 26889673 DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.37513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2015] [Accepted: 10/22/2015] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
As genome or exome sequencing (hereafter genome-scale sequencing) becomes more integrated into standard care, carrier testing is an important possible application. Carrier testing using genome-scale sequencing can identify a large number of conditions, but choosing which conditions/genes to evaluate as well as which results to disclose can be complicated. Carrier testing generally occurs in the context of reproductive decision-making and involves patient values in a way that other types of genetic testing may not. The Kaiser Permanente Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research program is conducting a randomized clinical trial of preconception carrier testing that allows participants to select their preferences for results from among broad descriptive categories rather than selecting individual conditions. This paper describes (1) the criteria developed by the research team, the return of results committee (RORC), and stakeholders for defining the categories; (2) the process of refining the categories based on input from patient focus groups and validation through a patient survey; and (3) how the RORC then assigned specific gene-condition pairs to taxonomy categories being piloted in the trial. The development of four categories (serious, moderate/mild, unpredictable, late onset) for sharing results allows patients to select results based on their values without separately deciding their interest in knowing their carrier status for hundreds of conditions. A fifth category, lifespan limiting, was always shared. The lessons learned may be applicable in other results disclosure situations, such as incidental findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diane M Korngiebel
- Department of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Carmit K McMullen
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon
| | - Laura M Amendola
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Jonathan S Berg
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - James V Davis
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon
| | - Marian J Gilmore
- Department of Medical Genetics, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon
| | - Cary O Harding
- Molecular and Medical Genetics, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Patricia Himes
- Department of Medical Genetics, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon
| | - Gail P Jarvik
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Tia L Kauffman
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon
| | - Kathleen A Kennedy
- Department of Perinatal Services, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon
| | | | - Michael C Leo
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon
| | - Frances L Lynch
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon
| | - Denise I Quigley
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon
| | - Jacob A Reiss
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon
| | - C Sue Richards
- Molecular and Medical Genetics, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Alan F Rope
- Department of Medical Genetics, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon
| | | | | | - Benjamin S Wilfond
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatrics Bioethics, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.,Division of Bioethics, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|