Weekly ixabepilone with or without biweekly bevacizumab in the treatment of recurrent or persistent uterine and ovarian/primary peritoneal/fallopian tube cancers: A retrospective review

Randomised phase II trial of weekly ixabepilone ± biweekly bevacizumab for platinum-resistant or refractory ovarian/fallopian tube/primary peritoneal cancer

BACKGROUND

This multi-center RP2 study assessed activity/safety of ixabepilone + bevacizumab compared to ixabepilone in platinum-resistant/refractory ovarian/fallopian tube/primary peritoneal cancer. Additional objectives were to examine the role of prior bevacizumab and taxanes, and explore class III-ß-tubulin (TUBB3) as a predictive biomarker.

METHODS

Participants were randomised to receive ixabepilone 20 mg/m2 days 1, 8, 15 with (IXA + BEV) or without (IXA) bevacizumab 10 mg/kg days 1, 15 every 28 days. Patients were stratified by prior BEV. The primary endpoint was PFS. OS, safety, and ORR served as secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

Among 76 evaluable patients who received IXA + BEV (n = 39) compared to IXA (n = 37), the ORR was 33% (n = 13) versus 8% (n = 3)(P = 0.004), durable at 6 months in 37% (n = 14) and 3% (n = 1) (P < 0.001). BEV significantly improved PFS (median:5.5 vs 2.2 months, HR = 0.33, 95%CI 0.19-0.55, P < 0.001) and OS (median:10.0 vs 6.0 months, HR = 0.52, 95%CI 0.31-0.87, P = 0.006). Both regimens were well-tolerated. TUBB3 expression did not predict response. Subgroup analyses revealed minimal effect of prior BEV or taxane resistant/refractory status on response to IXA + BEV.

CONCLUSIONS

IXA + BEV is a well-tolerated, effective combination for platinum/taxane-resistant ovarian cancer that extends PFS and likely OS relative to IXA monotherapy. Prior receipt of BEV should not preclude the use of IXA + BEV. TUBB3 is not a predictive biomarker.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT3093155.

Microtentacle Formation in Ovarian Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The development of chemoresistance to paclitaxel and carboplatin represents a major therapeutic challenge in ovarian cancer, a disease frequently characterized by malignant ascites and extrapelvic metastasis. Microtentacles (McTNs) are tubulin-based projections observed in detached breast cancer cells. In this study, we investigated whether ovarian cancers exhibit McTNs and characterized McTN biology.

METHODS

We used an established lipid-tethering mechanism to suspend and image individual cancer cells. We queried a panel of immortalized serous (OSC) and clear cell (OCCC) cell lines as well as freshly procured ascites and human ovarian surface epithelium (HOSE). We assessed by Western blot β-tubulin isotype, α-tubulin post-translational modifications and actin regulatory proteins in attached/detached states. We studied clustering in suspended conditions. Effects of treatment with microtubule depolymerizing and stabilizing drugs were described.

RESULTS

Among cell lines, up to 30% of cells expressed McTNs. Four McTN morphologies (absent, symmetric-short, symmetric-long, tufted) were observed in immortalized cultures as well as ascites. McTN number/length varied with histology according to metastatic potential. Most OCCC overexpressed class III ß-tubulin. OCCC/OSC cell lines exhibited a trend towards more microtubule-stabilizing post-translational modifications of α-tubulin relative to HOSE. Microtubule depolymerizing drugs decreased the number/length of McTNs, confirming that McTNs are composed of tubulin. Cells that failed to form McTNs demonstrated differential expression of α-tubulin- and actin-regulating proteins relative to cells that form McTNs. Cluster formation is more susceptible to microtubule targeting agents in cells that form McTNs, suggesting a role for McTNs in aggregation.

CONCLUSIONS

McTNs likely participate in key aspects of ovarian cancer metastasis. McTNs represent a new therapeutic target for this disease that could refine therapies, including intraperitoneal drug delivery.

Microtubule-Interfering Drugs: Current and Future Roles in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Treatment

Taxanes and epothilones are chemotherapeutic agents that ultimately lead to cell death through inhibition of normal microtubular function. This review summarizes the literature demonstrating their current use and potential promise as therapeutic agents in the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), as well as putative mechanisms of resistance. Historically, taxanes have become the standard of care in the front-line and recurrent treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer. In the past few years, epothilones (i.e., ixabepilone) have become of interest as they may retain activity in taxane-treated patients since they harbor several features that may overcome mechanisms of taxane resistance. Clinical data now support the use of ixabepilone in the treatment of platinum-resistant or refractory ovarian cancer. Clinical data strongly support the use of microtubule-interfering drugs alone or in combination in the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer. Ongoing clinical trials will shed further light into the potential of making these drugs part of current standard practice.

Ixabepilone: Overview of Effectiveness, Safety, and Tolerability in Metastatic Breast Cancer

Treatment algorithms for metastatic breast cancer describe sequential treatment with chemotherapy and, if appropriate, targeted therapy for as long as the patient receives benefit. The epothilone ixabepilone is a microtubule stabilizer approved as a monotherapy and in combination with capecitabine for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer in patients with demonstrated resistance to anthracyclines and taxanes. While chemotherapy and endocrine therapy form the backbone of treatment for metastatic breast cancer, the epothilone drug class has distinguished itself for efficacy and safety among patients with disease progression during treatment with chemotherapy. In phase III trials, ixabepilone has extended progression-free survival and increased overall response rates, with a manageable toxicity profile. Recent analyses of subpopulations within large pooled datasets have characterized the clinical benefit for progression-free survival and overall survival for ixabepilone in special populations, such as patients with triple-negative breast cancer or those who relapsed within 12 months of prior treatment. Additional investigation settings for ixabepilone therapy discussed here include adjuvant therapy, weekly dosing schedules, and ixabepilone in new combinations of treatment. As with other microtubule stabilizers, ixabepilone treatment can lead to peripheral neuropathy, but evidence-based management strategies may reverse these symptoms. Dose reductions did not appear to have an impact on the efficacy of ixabepilone plus capecitabine. Incorporation of ixabepilone into individualized treatment plans can extend progression-free survival in a patient population that continues to represent an unmet need.

Angiogenesis in endometrial carcinoma: Therapies and biomarkers, current options, and future perspectives

Endometrial carcinoma is the most common gynecologic malignancy and the fourth most prevalent cancer in women in the modern world. Despite a relatively high chance of surgical cure, for patients with advanced or recurrent disease there are few therapeutic options. Angiogenesis has been extensively studied ever since vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) was discovered in the 1980s. Several clinical trials of anti-angiogenic therapy in endometrial carcinoma have been conducted, with mixed results, and many researchers have tried to determine prognostic and therapeutic biomarkers. Recent trials, which shed new light on possible treatment biomarkers and efficacious combination therapies, are reviewed in this text. While we are still far from effectively tailoring anti-angiogenic treatment to each patient, these data have provided valuable insight and have put us on track for the discovery of novel opportunities for angiogenesis therapy in endometrial carcinoma.

Metronomic Chemotherapy: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Clinical Experience

Metronomic chemotherapy, continuous and dose-dense administration of chemotherapeutic drugs with lowered doses, is being evaluated for substituting, augmenting, or appending conventional maximum tolerated dose regimens, with preclinical and clinical studies for the past few decades. To date, the principle mechanisms of its action include impeding tumoral angiogenesis and modulation of hosts' immune system, affecting directly tumor cells, their progenitors, and neighboring stromal cells. Its better toxicity profile, lower cost, and easier use are main advantages over conventional therapies. The evidence of metronomic chemotherapy for personalized medicine is growing, starting with unfit elderly patients and also for palliative treatment. The literature reviewed in this article mainly demonstrates that metronomic chemotherapy is advantageous for selected patients and for certain types of malignancies, which make it a promising therapeutic approach for filling in the gaps. More clinical studies are needed to establish a solidified role for metronomic chemotherapy with other treatment models in modern cancer management.

Emerging Therapeutics to Overcome Chemoresistance in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Mini-Review

Ovarian cancer is the fifth leading cause of cancer death among women and the most lethal gynecologic malignancy. One of the leading causes of death in high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) is chemoresistant disease, which may present as intrinsic or acquired resistance to therapies. Here we discuss some of the known molecular mechanisms of chemoresistance that have been exhaustively investigated in chemoresistant ovarian cancer, including drug efflux pump multidrug resistance protein 1 (MDR1), the epithelial–mesenchymal transition, DNA damage and repair capacity. We also discuss novel therapeutics that may address some of the challenges in bringing approaches that target chemoresistant processes from bench to bedside. Some of these new therapies include novel drug delivery systems, targets that may halt adaptive changes in the tumor, exploitation of tumor mutations that leave cancer cells vulnerable to irreversible damage, and novel drugs that target ribosomal biogenesis, a process that may be uniquely different in cancer versus non-cancerous cells. Each of these approaches, or a combination of them, may provide a greater number of positive outcomes for a broader population of HGSOC patients.

A Phase II Multi-Center Study of Bevacizumab in Combination with Ixabepilone in Subjects with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma

Lessons Learned.

Accrual to renal cell carcinoma trials remains a challenge despite the lack of prolonged response to the available treatments.

The observation of three responses among the 30 patients with median progression‐free survival and overall survival of 8.3 and 15 months, respectively, indicates the combination has some activity, but it is not sufficient for further development.

Background.

Treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) remains suboptimal. Preclinical data have previously shown that ixabepilone, a microtubule‐stabilizing agent approved for the treatment of breast cancer, is active in taxane‐sensitive and ‐resistant cells. In this single‐arm phase II trial, we investigated a combination of ixabepilone plus bevacizumab in patients with refractory mRCC.

Methods.

We enrolled 30 patients with histologically confirmed mRCC, clear cell subtype, who had not been previously treated with ixabepilone or bevacizumab but had received at least one prior U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)‐approved treatment for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The treatment regimen consisted of 6 mg/m² ixabepilone per day for 5 days and 15 mg/kg bevacizumab every 21 days. After 6 cycles, the treatment interval could be extended to every 28 days. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Secondary endpoints were progression‐free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and the toxicity of the combination.

Results.

The median number of prior therapies was two (range per patient one to five). Patients received a median of 8 cycles of ixabepilone plus bevacizumab (range 2–54). The median follow‐up was 36.4 months (range 23.5–96.5). Nineteen patients (63.3%) had stable disease as a best response. Three patients (10%) had a partial response. The median PFS was 8.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.9–10.6) and the median OS was 15.0 months (95% CI, 11.3–28.8). The total number of cycle for safety evaluation was 289. Grade 3/4 adverse events (>5% incidence) included lymphopenia (16.7%), hypertension (6.7%), and leukopenia (6.7%).

Conclusion.

The combination of ixabepilone and bevacizumab was well tolerated, with modest activity in second ‐ or later‐line mRCC, but it is not recommended as a therapy without further clinical development. Alternative combinations with these agents could be explored in future studies.

The ascidian natural product eusynstyelamide B is a novel topoisomerase II poison that induces DNA damage and growth arrest in prostate and breast cancer cells

As part of an anti-cancer natural product drug discovery program, we recently identified eusynstyelamide B (EB), which displayed cytotoxicity against MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells (IC₅₀ = 5 μM) and induced apoptosis. Here, we investigated the mechanism of action of EB in cancer cell lines of the prostate (LNCaP) and breast (MDA-MB-231). EB inhibited cell growth (IC₅₀ = 5 μM) and induced a G2 cell cycle arrest, as shown by a significant increase in the G2/M cell population in the absence of elevated levels of the mitotic marker phospho-histone H3. In contrast to MDA-MB-231 cells, EB did not induce cell death in LNCaP cells when treated for up to 10 days. Transcript profiling and Ingenuity Pathway Analysis suggested that EB activated DNA damage pathways in LNCaP cells. Consistent with this, CHK2 phosphorylation was increased, p21^CIP1/WAF1 was up-regulated and CDC2 expression strongly reduced by EB. Importantly, EB caused DNA double-strand breaks, yet did not directly interact with DNA. Analysis of topoisomerase II-mediated decatenation discovered that EB is a novel topoisomerase II poison.

Azaepothilone B and its derivatives: a patent review

INTRODUCTION

Azaepothilone B, also known as ixabepilone, is a semi synthetic second generation epothilone B analogue. Azaepothilone B, its derivatives, and analogues, are used for treating advance metastatic breast cancer. It has been used as a chemotherapeutic medication for cancer.

AREAS COVERED

This review highlights the patents on different routes for synthesis of azaepothilone B, its derivatives and analogues. The review will also provide the reported pharmacological activity and its polymorphs in the treatment of several cancers, such as breast cancer (metastatic or locally advanced), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and pancreatic cancer. In addition, it considers other proliferative diseases such as viral infections, degenerative diseases of the musculoskeletal system, kidney disease, and immune response related diseases. Different databases such as Espacenet, ISI Web of Knowledge, Patbase, and Thomson Innovation have been searched extensively to review the patents. The analysis has been done to indicate the patenting trend across years and the comparison of active assignees.

EXPERT OPINION

Azaepothilone B, along with its derivatives and analogues, can damage cancer cells in very low concentrations and retain its activity when tumor cells are insensitive to paclitaxel. Hence, it is highly potent agent. Azaepothilone B alone, in combination with other chemotherapeutics, or in the form of formulations, led to applications in various types of cancer. Also, antiproliferative activity of azaepothilone B has great potential for the treatment of proliferative diseases, such as skin diseases and infections. Recent progress in synthesizing azaepothilone B has encouraged researchers to develop new methods for the synthesis of azaepothilone B, its derivatives, and analogues, to obtain maximum yield in minimum steps.

Ixabepilone for the treatment of endometrial cancer

INTRODUCTION

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynaecological cancer. Despite significant progress in the multimodality treatment approach, the prognosis remains poor for patients with advanced disease. Thus, there is the necessity of more effective strategies. The microtubule-stabilizing agent ixabepilone is the first drug in this new class of agents that has been approved for metastatic breast cancer treatment. Based on empiric data and on the clinical efficacy demonstrated in breast cancer, several clinical trials were proposed to define its role in EC. The aim of this review is to determine whether ixabepilone improved the clinical outcome in patients with locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic EC.

AREAS COVERED

Preclinical and clinical studies of ixabepilone in endometrial cancer were analyzed and discussed. Data were obtained by searching for English peer-reviewed articles on PubMed, phase I and II studies registered on clincaltrials.gov, and related abstracts recently presented at major international congresses.

EXPERT OPINION

Advanced or recurrent EC still represents a challenge and an unmet need in the panorama of gynaecological malignancies. Ixabepilone's future therapeutic role in EC remains ill defined. Nevertheless, despite its limited efficacy in EC, clinicians treating gynaecological tumours should be aware of its main aspects.