Pros and cons of vaginal brachytherapy after external beam radiation therapy in endometrial cancer

Data Set for the Reporting of Endometrial Cancer: Recommendations From the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR)

Endometrial cancer is one of the most common cancers among women. The International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR) developed a standardized endometrial cancer data set in 2011, which provided detailed recommendations for the reporting of resection specimens of these neoplasms. A new data set has been developed, which incorporates the updated 2020 World Health Organization Classification of Female Genital Tumors, the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) molecular classification of endometrial cancers, and other major advances in endometrial cancer reporting, all of which necessitated a major revision of the data set. This updated data set has been produced by a panel of expert pathologists and an expert clinician and has been subject to international open consultation. The data set includes core elements which are unanimously agreed upon as essential for cancer diagnosis, clinical management, staging, or prognosis and noncore elements which are clinically important, but not essential. Explanatory notes are provided for each element. Adoption of this updated data set will result in improvements in endometrial cancer patient care.

The role for vaginal cuff brachytherapy boost after external beam radiation therapy in endometrial cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the role and technique of a vaginal cuff brachytherapy (VB) boost to adjuvant external beam (EB) radiation for endometrial cancer through a systematic review.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Relevant trials were identified through a systematic search of the literature.

RESULTS

A total of 21 prospective and retrospective studies which had a patient cohort undergoing EB + VB was identified to evaluate for rates of vaginal and pelvic recurrences, overall survival, and toxicity. Additional database studies were utilized to demonstrate differences in local control and overall survival between EB and EB + VB.

CONCLUSIONS

While there is limited prospective evidence to guide the use of a VB boost after EB, the evidence suggests that patients with a higher risk of a vaginal recurrence such as those with cervical stromal involvement in select Stage III patients may derive local control and survival benefits from a VB boost. Additional individual risk factors such as grade, histology, extent of invasion, margin status, age, and the use of lower doses of EB should be considered when deciding when to add a VB boost.

Is one brachytherapy fraction of 7 Gy similar to more fractions after external beam irradiation in postoperative endometrial carcinoma?

PURPOSE

To determine whether brachytherapy with a single hypofractionated dose of 7 Gy provides the similar vaginal-cuff relapses and safety profile in terms of complications compared to schedules of 2 or 3 fractions of lower doses in patients treated previously with external beam irradiation in postoperative endometrial carcinoma.

METHODS/MATERIAL

From June 2003 to December 2016, 325 patients were treated with 3 different schedules of high-dose-rate brachytherapy after external beam irradiation for postoperative endometrial carcinoma. The patients were divided into 3 groups: Group-1: 125 patients were treated with 3 fractions of 4-6 Gy per fraction (3 fractions/week) between 2003 and 2008; Group-2: 93 patients were treated with 2 consecutive daily fractions of 5-6 Gy between 2008 and 2011; Group-3: 107 patients received a single fraction of 7 Gy between 2011 and 2016. Bladder and rectum complications were assessed using RTOG scores and with the objective scores of LENT-SOMA for the vagina.

STATISTICS

the chi-square test.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up of Groups 1, 2 and 3 was 95, 67 and 51 months, respectively. Three patients in Group-1, 2 in Group-2, 1 in Group-3 developed vaginal-cuff relapse (p = 0.68). No differences were found in late toxicity among the three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

One single dose of 7 Gy is safe and effective and may be the best treatment schedule with a similar incidence of vaginal-cuff relapses, complications and patient comfort with less hospital attendance.

Radiotherapy practices in postoperative endometrial cancer: A survey of the ABS membership

PURPOSE

This survey aimed to document the current practice patterns of postoperative radiotherapy (RT), including vaginal vault brachytherapy (VVB) and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), in the management of patients with endometrial cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A 30-item, multiple choice survey querying RT prescribing practices and planning techniques was distributed electronically to American Brachytherapy Society members in December 2018.

RESULTS

Seventy-five surveys from 62 centers were completed. Eighty-nine percent of respondents practiced within the USA or Canada. Most (79%) respondents indicated a preference for recommending adjuvant VVB alone in FIGO Stage IB, Grade 2 margin and lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) negative disease. For FIGO Stage IB, Grade 3, LVSI-positive disease, most respondents preferred incorporating EBRT either alone (33%) or with VVB (28%). For IIIC1, margin positive disease, VVB in addition to EBRT was most commonly recommended (75%). When planning adjuvant EBRT, 49% utilized CT simulation with both bladder full and empty. Internal target volume was utilized by 53%. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (53%) or intensity-modulated radiotherapy (19%) were commonly used planning techniques. The most common dose prescription was 45 Gy in 25 fractions (57%). When treating with VVB, 49% determined applicator size at the time of brachytherapy. Sixty-four percent planned treatments based on CT imaging with the applicator in situ and 33% repeated CT imaging before each subsequent fraction. The most common prescription was 21 Gy in three fractions prescribed to 0.5 cm depth (43%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified variability in treatment recommendations and in both EBRT and VVB simulation and planning processes in postoperative endometrial cancer.

Current recommendations and recent progress in endometrial cancer

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic cancer in the United States, and its incidence is rising. Although there have been significant recent advances in our understanding of endometrial cancer biology, many aspects of treatment remain mired in controversy, including the role of surgical lymph node assessment and the selection of patients for adjuvant radiation or chemotherapy. For the subset of women with microsatellite-instable, metastatic disease, anti- programmed cell death protein 1 immunotherapy (pembrolizumab) is now approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, and numerous trials are attempting to build on this early success.

A tumor board report of an 83-year-old woman with stage IB grade 3 endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma

An 83-year-old woman presented with postmenopausal bleeding ultimately leading to surgery and a final diagnosis of stage IB grade 3 endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma. The tumor board reviewed current literature regarding the efficacy of sentinel lymph node dissection in appropriately allocating stage in high-grade endometrial cancer. The optimal role of adjuvant treatment in this setting is unclear. Current literature surrounding adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy, as well as current practices in molecular diagnostics for endometrial cancer were reviewed. The tumor board concluded that literature surrounding sentinel lymph node evaluation in high-grade endometrial cancers is robust enough to incorporate into clinical practice. Based on the best available evidence, a decision was made to treat with external beam radiotherapy and withhold chemotherapy.

Top Ten Tips Palliative Care Clinicians Should Know When Caring for Patients with Endometrial Cancer

Endometrial cancer incidence has been increasing over the last two decades, likely due to the obesity epidemic. The majority of these cancers are confined to the uterus at diagnosis and can be cured with surgery. Overall, five-year disease-specific survival is about 80%, but some patients have locally advanced or metastatic disease that is not amenable to control with radiation and/or chemotherapy. Disease-related symptoms are most common in this subset of patients with endometrial cancer, although women with early-stage disease may also experience side effects related to surgical menopause or adjuvant treatment. In recent years, professional societies have been increasingly vocal about the importance of incorporating palliative care early in a patient's disease course. As these calls increase, palliative care clinicians will likely increasingly comanage patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. We brought together a team of gynecologic oncology and palliative care experts to assemble practical tips for the care of women with endometrial cancer. In this article, we use a "Top 10" format to highlight issues that may help palliative care physicians understand a patient's prognosis, address common misconceptions about endometrial cancer, and improve the quality of shared decision making and goals of care discussions.

[Primary management of endometrial carcinoma. Joint recommendations of the French society of gynecologic oncology (SFOG) and of the French college of obstetricians and gynecologists (CNGOF)]

OBJECTIVES

The management of endometrial carcinoma is constantly evolving. The SFOG and the CNGOF decided to jointly update the previous French recommendations (Institut national du cancer 2011) and to adapt to the French practice the 2015 recommendations elaborated at the time of joint European consensus conference with the participation of the three concerned European societies (ESGO, ESTRO, ESMO).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A strict methodology was used. A steering committee was put together. A systematic review of the literature since 2011 has been carried out. A first draft of the recommendations has been elaborated, with emphasis on high level of evidence. An external review by users representing all the concerned discipines and all kinds of practice was completed. Three hundred and four comments were sent by 54 reviewers.

RESULTS

The management of endometrial carcinoma requires a precise preoperative workup. A provisional estimate of the final stage is provided. This estimation impact the level of surgical staging. Surgery should use a minimal invasive approach. The final pathology is the key of the decision concerning adjuvant therapy, which involves surveillance, radiation therapy, brachytherapy, or chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

The management algorithms allow a fast, state of the art based, answer to the clinical questions raised by the management of endometrial cancer. They must be used only in the setting of a multidisciplinary team at all stages of the management.

MR- versus CT-based high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy for vaginal recurrence of endometrial cancer

PURPOSE

To compare clinical outcomes of MR-based versus CT-based high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT) for vaginal recurrence of endometrioid endometrial cancer (EC).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We reviewed 66 patients with vaginal recurrent EC; 18 had MR-based ISBT on a prospective clinical trial and 48 had CT-based treatment. Kaplan-Meier survival modeling was used to generate estimates for local control (LC), disease-free interval (DFI), and overall survival (OS), and multivariate Cox modeling was used to assess prognostic factors. Toxicities were evaluated and compared.

RESULTS

Median followup was 33 months (CT 30 months, MR 35 months). Median cumulative equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions was 75.5 Gy for MR-ISBT and 73.8 Gy for CT-ISBT (p = 0.58). MR patients were older (p = 0.03) and had larger tumor size (>4 cm vs. ≤ 4 cm) compared to CT patients (p = 0.04). For MR-based versus CT-based ISBT, 3-year KM rate for local control was 100% versus 78% (p = 0.04), DFI was 69% versus 55% (p = 0.1), and OS was 63% versus 75% (p = 0.81), respectively. On multivariate analysis, tumor Grade 3 was associated with worse OS (HR 3.57, 95% CI 1.25, 11.36) in a model with MR-ISBT (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.16, 1.89). Toxicities were not significantly different between the two modalities.

CONCLUSION

Despite worse patient prognostic features, MR-ISBT was associated with a significantly better (100%) 3-year local control, comparable survival, and improved DFI rates compared to CT. Toxicities did not differ compared to CT-ISBT patients. Tumor grade contributed as the most significant predictor for survival. Larger prospective studies are needed to assess the impact of MR-ISBT on survival outcomes.

Comparative results of three short brachytherapy schedules as exclusive treatment in postoperative endometrial carcinoma

PURPOSE

To compare vaginal control and treatment toxicity of three different high-dose-rate brachytherapy schedules as exclusive treatment in postoperative endometrial carcinoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From 2003 to 2015, three different schedules were used as postoperative treatment for 146 patients (p) with intermediate-risk endometrial carcinoma. Group 1 (41 p): six fractions of 4-6 Gy, 3-4 fractions per week; Group 2 (59 p): four fractions of 5-6 Gy administered daily; Group 3 (46 p): 6 Gy × 3 fractions in three consecutive days. The dose was prescribed at 5 mm of applicator surface using an active treatment length of 2.5 cm. Toxicity scores were evaluated using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group scores for bladder and rectum and the objective criteria of late effects of normal tissues-subjective, objective, management, analytic for vagina. Statistics used were group descriptions calculating their means, medians, and ranges. Bivariate analysis was evaluated using variance models and χ² tests.

RESULTS

The mean followup was as follows: Group 1: 88 months, Group 2: 75 months, and 41 months in Group 3. No vaginal relapses were found. Late toxicity ≥ G2: rectum: 0 p in the three groups (0%). Bladder: Group 1: 1 p (2.4%), Group 2: 0%, and Group 3: 0%. Vagina: Group 1: 4 p (9.5%); Group 2: 9 p (15.3%); and Group 3:10 p (21.8%). There were no differences in late toxicity among the three groups of patients for rectum (p = 0.83), bladder (p = 0.58), and vagina (p = 0.67); the expected global risk of complications for rectum, bladder, and vagina is 0.8%, 0.8%, and 28.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Similar results in vaginal control and complications were achieved with the three schedules. The use of three fractions of 6 Gy administered daily is the best option for patient comfort and convenience and use of resources. Nonetheless, specific studies are needed to demonstrate the best cost-efficacy regime.

Effects of vaginal cylinder position on dose distribution in patients with endometrial carcinoma in treatment of vaginal cuff brachytherapy

PURPOSE

To investigate the impact of different cylinder positions on dosimetry of critical structures in patients with endometrial carcinoma undergoing three-dimensional image-based vaginal cuff brachytherapy (VCB).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We delivered VCB at a dose of 4 Gy to a depth of 5 mm in the vaginal cuff of 15 patients using three different cylinder positions (neutral [N], parallel [P], and angled [A]) according to the longitudinal axis of the patient. We analyzed the dose-volume distribution and volumetric variability of the rectum and bladder. We converted the total doses to equivalent doses in 2 Gy (EQD₂) using a linear-quadratic model (a/b = 3 Gy).

RESULTS

The mean rectum volume for the N, P, and A positions was 68.2 ± 22.7 cc, 79.3 ± 33.7 cc, and 74.2 ± 29.6 cc, respectively. The mean rectum volume for the P position was significantly larger than that for the N position (p = 0.03). Relative to the N position, the A position resulted in a lower total EQD₂ in the highest irradiated 2 cc (D_2cc; p = 0.001), 1 cc (D_1cc; p = 0.004), and 0.1 cc (D_0.1cc; p = 0.047) of the rectum. Similarly, the P position resulted in a lower EQD₂ in the D_2cc (p = 0.018) and D_1cc (p = 0.024) of the rectum relative to the N position. In the bladder, the P position resulted in a higher EQD₂ in the D_2cc relative to the N position (p = 0.02). There was no dosimetric difference between the P and A positions in either the rectum or the bladder.

CONCLUSIONS

Vaginal cuff brachytherapy in the P and A positions is significantly superior to that in the N position in terms of rectum dosimetry. The bladder dose in the N position is considerably lower than that in the other positions.

A new short daily brachytherapy schedule in postoperative endometrial carcinoma. Preliminary results

PURPOSE

To evaluate the preliminary results of vaginal-cuff relapses (VCR) and complications of a short brachytherapy (BT) schedule in postoperative endometrial carcinoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From September 2011 to December 2014, 102 patients were treated with postoperative BT for endometrial carcinoma. Seventy-four patients received a single 7 Gy dose after external beam irradiation (Group 1), and 28 intermediate-risk patients received three daily fractions of 6 Gy (Group 2). The dose was prescribed at 5 mm from the applicator surface. Toxicity was prospectively evaluated after the objective late effects of normal tissues-subjective, objective, management, analytic scores for vagina and RTOG scores for rectum and bladder.

STATISTICS

χ² and Student's t tests.

RESULTS

The mean followup was 28.85 months (9.6-58.5) in Group 1 and 31.19 months (7.7-62.3) in Group 2. No VCR was found during followup. Late toxicity: vagina toxicity was developed in 24.32% of the patients in Group 1 (G1-G2) and in 21.4% in Group 2 (G1-G2 but 1 G3). Rectal toxicity appeared in only 2.7% of patients in Group 1 (G1). Neither Group 1 nor Group 2 presented late bladder toxicity. No differences were found in late toxicity between Groups 1 and 2.

CONCLUSIONS

The present short BT schedule was safe in relation to VCR and late toxicity for the followup period studied. These results are similar to those of two larger previous schedules performed in our center in relation to the same point of followup.