Is adjuvant chemotherapy beneficial for surgical stage I ovarian clear cell carcinoma?

Patients with stage IA ovarian clear cell carcinoma do not require chemotherapy following surgery

BACKGROUND

Ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) is an infrequent histological subtype of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). The present study aimed to investigate whether chemotherapy is indispensable for patients with stage IA OCCC.

METHODS

Data were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database between 2004 and 2015. All subjects were diagnosed with stage IA OCCC, according to their postoperative pathological reports. In the present study, 1038 patients were retrospectively investigated, among whom 692 patients received chemotherapy. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to prevent selection bias. The multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyze the correlation between variables and 5-year overall survival.

RESULTS

An equal number of patients (n = 346) who did or did not undergo chemotherapy after PSM were further enrolled in the study. The results showed that the mortality of OCCC increased for the patients aged ≥50 years. In addition, older age was associated with lower 5-year overall survival (p < 0.05). However, chemotherapy did not extend the 5-year overall survival (p = 0.524) of patients with stage IA OCCC, according to the multivariate Cox regression analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Chemotherapy did not affect the overall survival of patients with stage IA OCCC following surgery.

Impact of Adjuvant Chemotherapy on FIGO Stage I Ovarian Clear Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) is an uncommon subtype of epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) that is often diagnosed at an earlier stage in younger women. It remains uncertain whether adjuvant chemotherapy improves the prognosis of patients with stage I OCCC.

Objective

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival in patients with stage I OCCC.

Search Strategy

Eligible studies were screened from PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to October 10, 2021.

Selection Criteria

Studies that compared the oncological outcomes of adjuvant chemotherapy with observation were included.

Data Collection and Analysis

Six studies comprising a total of 4553 patients were enrolled in our study, of whom 3320 (72.9%) patients had undergone adjuvant chemotherapy and 1233 (27.1%) had not.

Main Results

The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and 5-year overall survival (OS) of stage I OCCC were 82.7% and 86.3%, respectively. In the overall population, adjuvant chemotherapy did not improve the 5-year DFS (83.2% vs 83.7%, OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.21-2.82, P=0.69) or 5-year OS (87.3% vs 83.6%, OR 1.30, 95% CI 0.86–1.98, P=0.22). Further subgroup analysis on stage IA/IB suggested that adjuvant chemotherapy did not impact 5-year DFS (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.01-5.29, P=0.34) or 5-year OS (OR 1.52, 95% CI 0.78-2.98, P=0.22). For stage IC including 1798 patients, adjuvant chemotherapy revealed a significant survival benefit for 5-year OS (84.5% vs 83.3%, OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.08-1.94, P=0.01). Furthermore, the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy was found to be associated with a better 5-year OS (OR 4.98, 95% CI 1.12-22.22, P=0.04) in stage IC2/3. But no inferences regarding the effect of AC on stage IC2/3 can be made due to the limited size of the non-AC arm.

Conclusion

This study indicated that adjuvant chemotherapy did not improve the prognosis of stage IA and IB OCCC patients. However, for patients with stage IC, due to the retrospective, heterogenous and older data with limited sample size, the pooled results of our study should be interpreted with caution. More prospective studies on the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage I OCCC are warranted.

Systematic Review Registration

PROSPERO, CRD42021287749.

Tumor Size Is an Independent Prognostic Factor for Stage I Ovarian Clear Cell Carcinoma: A Large Retrospective Cohort Study of 1,000 Patients

Objective

The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic value and stratification cutoff point for tumor size in stage I ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC).

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (version: SEER 8.3.9). Patients diagnosed with stage I OCCC from 1988 to 2018 were included for further analysis. X-Tile software was used to identify the potential cutoff point for tumor size. Stratification analysis, propensity score matching, and inverse probability weighting analysis were used to balance the potential confounding factors.

Results

A total of 1,000 stage I OCCC patients were included. Of these 1,000 patients, median follow-up was 106 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 89-112 months). Multivariate analysis showed that tumor size, age at diagnosis, and stage IC were significantly associated with stage I OCCC patients. Eight centimeters is a promising cutoff point that can divide stage I OCCC patients into a good or a poor prognosis group. After controlling potential confounding factors with propensity score matching and inverse probability weighting, we demonstrated that stage I OCCC patients with tumor size ≤ 8 cm enjoyed a significantly better 5-year overall survival (OS, 89.8% vs. 81%, p < 0.0001). Tumor size ≤ 8 cm was an independent prognostic factor of stage I OCCC patients (hazard ratio [HR] 0.5608, 95% CI: 0.4126-0.7622, p = 0.0002).

Conclusions

Tumor size is an independent prognostic factor for stage I OCCC, and 8 cm is a promising cutoff point for tumor size for risk stratification. However, using tumor size in the stratification management of stage I OCCC patients warrants further investigation.

Adjuvant taxane plus platinum chemotherapy for stage I ovarian clear cell carcinoma with complete surgical staging: are more than three cycles necessary?

BACKGROUND

Previous studies on adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) have included a limited number of Asian patients with surgical stage I OCCC, despite differences in OCCC survival by race and stage. The aim of this study was to estimate the survival effect of the number of cycles of adjuvant taxane plus carboplatin chemotherapy in Asian patients with surgical stage I OCCC.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 227 patients with surgical stage I OCCC at 14 institutions from 1995 to 2017. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard regression with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) adjustment were performed to evaluate overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients receiving ≤ 3 and 4-6 cycles of taxane plus platinum adjuvant chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Eighty-nine and 138 patients received ≤ 3 and 4-6 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy, respectively. There was no between-group difference in OS or RFS with or without IPTW adjustment. In Cox proportional hazards analysis, 4-6 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy were not associated with improved OS (HR 1.090; 95% CI 0.518-2.291; p = 0.821) or RFS (HR 1.144; 95% CI 0.619-2.114; p = 0.669) compared to ≤ 3 cycles, even with IPTW adjustment. Subgroup analysis in different substages of stage I OCCC showed that the number of cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy had no impact on OS or RFS.

CONCLUSION

Three or fewer cycles of taxane plus carboplatin chemotherapy may be a reasonable treatment regime for patients with surgical staging I OCCC.

Early-stage clear cell ovarian cancer compared to high-grade histological subtypes: An outcome exploratory analysis in two oncology centers

OBJECTIVE

advanced stage clear cell ovarian cancer (CCOC) carries a higher risk of relapse and death compared to other histological subtypes. The prognosis of early-stage CCOC is controversial.

METHODS

Early-stage high-grade OC patients from two Italian oncologic centers were included. Patients with early-stage CCOC were compared with those with high-grade endometrioid (HGE) and serous (HGS) OC in terms of relapse-free interval (RFI), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and post relapse cancer-specific survival (prCSS). The Cox proportional hazard model and the restricted mean survival time were used.

RESULTS

Between 1981 and 2012, 134 patients with CC, 152 with HGE and 160 with HGS were treated at two referral centers. Median follow-up was 11.5 years. Ten years RFI rates were 80.6%, 72.1%, 60.6%, and CSS rates were 84.3%, 82.6%, 81.7% respectively. Adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved RFI (aHR 0.61, 95%CI 0.40 to 0.91, P = 0.015). In the multivariable analysis HGS histotype was associated with a shorter RFI compared to CC, (Hazard Ratio [HR]: 1.81; 95%CI: 1.12-2.93; P = 0.016), whereas CSS was not statistically different. prCSS was longer in HGS compared to CCOC (HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.17-0.74; P = 0.006). According to the stage, IA/IB/IC1 HGSOC had a shorter RFI (HR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.14-3.99; P = 0.018) compared to IA/IB/IC1 CCOC, but similar CSS. For prCSS, CC compared to HGS conferred a worse prognosis regardless of the initial stage.

CONCLUSIONS

Early-stage CCOC is associated with a longer RFI, similar CSS and a shorter prCSS compared to HGSOC. No prognostic differences were observed between CC and HGE OC. The relapse risk was the lowest in IA/IB/IC1 CC compared to HGS, whereas CC displayed poor sensitivity to chemotherapy after relapse.

Adjuvant chemotherapy vs. observation in stage I clear cell ovarian carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The role of adjuvant chemotherapy in surgically staged stage I clear cell ovarian cancer (OCCC) is unclear. Here, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis in order to evaluate the role of chemotherapy vs. observation in stage I OCCC. This systematic review was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; ID: #129628). A protocol was defined prior to the search include the population criteria, description of interventions, comparisons, and the outcomes of interest, according to the PRIMA guidelines. Overall, the study population included 5073 women. Stage I OCCC experienced a 5-year disease-free survival and a 5-year overall survival of 83.7% and 86.9%, respectively. Pooled data suggested that in the overall population adjuvant chemotherapy did not impact on 5-year disease free survival (test for overall effect, Z = 0.18; p = 0.86) and 5-year overall survival (test for overall effect, Z = 0.62; p = 0.53). Focusing on 2264 stage IC OCCC we observed that adjuvant correlated with an improvement in overall survival (OR: 0.70 (95%CI: 0.52 to 0.93); Z = 2.44; p = 0.01). In conclusion our study underlines that adjuvant chemotherapy could be reserved for patients with stage IC OCCC; while in stage IA and IB it could be safely omitted. Owing to the inherent biases of the studies included in the meta-analysis further prospective evidences are needed.

Clinical Characteristics of Clear Cell Ovarian Cancer: A Retrospective Multicenter Experience of 308 Patients in South Korea

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical characteristics and treatment pattern of ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) in Korea and the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage.

Materials and Methods

Medical records of 308 cases of from 21 institutions were reviewed and data including age, performance status, endometriosis, thromboembolism, stage, cancer antigen 125, treatment, recurrence, and death were collected.

Results

Regarding stage of OCCC, it was stage I in 194 (63.6%), stage II in 34 (11.1%), stage III in 66 (21.6%), and stage IV in 11 (3.6%) patients. All patients underwent surgery. Optimal surgery (residual disease ≤ 1 cm) was achieved in 89.3%. Majority of patients (80.5%) received postoperative chemotherapy. The most common regimen was taxane-platinum combination (96%). Median relapse-free survival (RFS) was 138.5 months for stage I, 33.4 for stage II, 19.3 for stage III, and 9.7 for stage IV. Median overall survival (OS) were not reached, 112.4, 48.7, and 18.3 months for stage I, II, III, and IV, respectively. Early-stage (stage I), endometriosis, and optimal debulking were identified as favorable prognostic factors for RFS. Early-stage and optimal debulking were also favorable prognostic factors for OS. Majority of patients with early-stage received adjuvant chemotherapy. However, additional survival benefit was not found in terms of recurrence.

Conclusion

Majority of patients had early-stage and received postoperative chemotherapy regardless of stage. Early-stage and optimal debulking were identified as favorable prognostic factors. In stage IA or IB, adding adjuvant chemotherapy did not show difference in survival. Further study focusing on OCCC is required.

The Evolving Landscape of Chemotherapy in Newly Diagnosed Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

The treatment of women with advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is aggressive surgical cytoreduction and a combination of platinum plus taxane chemotherapy. The timing and extent of surgery has direct implications on the selection of subsequent treatment as well as the prognosis of patients with EOC. Frontline chemotherapeutic regimens have evolved through a series of large multi-institutional randomized clinical trials that focused on targeted agents as maintenance therapy. On June 13, 2018, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved adding bevacizumab to adjuvant intravenous chemotherapy followed by maintenance based on the results of Gynecologic Oncology Group protocol 218. Maintenance olaparib was FDA-approved on December 19, 2018, for frontline maintenance among those with advanced EOC who respond to frontline chemotherapy and harbor a germline or somatic BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. This was based on the results of SOLO-1. Despite a strong rationale and extensive study, intraperitoneal chemotherapy has not been adopted in clinical practice. Alternatively, heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy has shown promise as a more tolerable and technically feasible method of regional therapy, but widespread application will require more evidence. Significant strides have also been made in understanding the biology of EOC, resulting in a personalized approach to first-line therapy. One approach calls for recognizing differences in histologic subtypes and molecular alterations, which may open up alternative therapeutic interventions.