1
|
Salcedo-Hernandez RA, Barquet-Muñoz S, Isla-Ortiz D, Lucero-Serrano F, Lino-Silva LS, de León DC, Cetina-Perez L. Factors associated with emergency room readmission after elective surgery for ovarian carcinoma. BMC Womens Health 2023; 23:473. [PMID: 37667261 PMCID: PMC10476342 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-023-02579-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hospital readmission is a quality metric of hospital care and has been studied in ovarian carcinoma, but its evaluation has several limitations. Also, emergency room (ER) readmission is considered an adverse effect because it represents patient costs. Therefore, our objective was to determine the rate of ER readmission, its causes, and associated factors. METHODS A retrospective study of 592 patients with ovarian carcinoma who underwent upfront surgery, neoadjuvant therapy, or surgery for recurrent disease. An analysis of factors associated with ER readmission, hospital readmission, and surgical complications was performed, including multivariate analysis to assess for case-mix factors. RESULTS Of 592 patients, the median age was 51 years, and the predominant type of treatment was the neoadjuvant approach (52.9%); 46% underwent upfront surgeries and six surgeries for recurrence. The ratio to ER readmission was 11.8% (70 patients), of whom 12 patients were admitted more than once. The factors associated with ER readmission were prolonged surgery, intraoperative bleeding, extended hospital stay, the time of the day when the surgery was performed, and post-surgical complications. The hospital readmissions were 4.2%, and the overall morbidity was 17.6%. In the multivariate analysis, the only factor associated with ER readmission was the presence of surgical complications (OR = 39.01). The factors independently associated with hospital readmission were the entrance to the intensive care unit (OR = 1.37), the presence of surgical complications (OR = 2.85), and ER readmission (OR = 1.45). CONCLUSION ER readmission is an adverse event representing the presence of symptoms/complications in patients. Evaluating the ER readmission independently of the readmission to the hospital is critical because it will allow modifying medical care behaviors to prevent patients from unnecessarily returning to the hospital after a hospital discharge to manage preventable medical problems. TRIAL REGISTRATION researchregistry7882.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosa A Salcedo-Hernandez
- Programa de Maestría y Doctorado en Ciencias Médicas, Odontológicas y de la Salud. UNAM, Mexico City, Mexico.
- Departamento de Ginecología, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico.
| | - Salim Barquet-Muñoz
- Departamento de Ginecología, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - David Isla-Ortiz
- Departamento de Ginecología, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico
- Division of Research, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, San Fernando Avenue 22, 14050, ZP, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | | | - David Cantú de León
- Dirección de Investigación, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico
- Division of Research, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, San Fernando Avenue 22, 14050, ZP, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Lucely Cetina-Perez
- Subdirección de Investigación Clínica, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico.
- Clinical Research, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, San Fernando 22, 14050, ZP, Mexico City, Mexico.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lindemann K, Kleppe A, Eyjólfsdóttir B, Heimisdottir Danbolt S, Wang YY, Heli-Haugestøl AG, Walcott SL, Mjåland O, Navestad GA, Hermanrud S, Juul-Hansen KE, Kongsgaard U. Prospective evaluation of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway in a Norwegian cohort of patients with suspected or advanced ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2023; 33:1279-1286. [PMID: 37451690 PMCID: PMC10423533 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-004355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2023] [Accepted: 05/18/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This prospective cohort study evaluated the introduction of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway in a tertiary gynecologic oncology referral center. Compliance and clinical outcomes were studied in two separate surgical cohorts. METHODS Patients undergoing laparotomy for suspected or verified advanced ovarian cancer at Oslo University Hospital were prospectively included in a pre- and post-implementation cohort. A priori, patients were stratified into: cohort 1, patients planned for surgery of advanced disease; and cohort 2, patients undergoing surgery for suspicious pelvic tumor. Baseline characteristics, adherence to the pathway, and clinical outcomes were assessed. RESULTS Of the 439 included patients, 235 (54%) underwent surgery for advanced ovarian cancer in cohort 1 and 204 (46%) in cohort 2. In cohort 1, 53% of the patients underwent surgery with an intermediate/high Aletti complexity score. Post-ERAS, median fasting times for solids (13.1 hours post-ERAS vs 16.0 hours pre-ERAS, p<0.001) and fluids (3.7 hours post-ERAS vs 11.0 hours pre-ERAS, p<0.001) were significantly reduced. Peri-operative fluid management varied less and was reduced from median 15.8 mL/kg/hour (IQR 10.8-22.5) to 11.5 mL/kg/hour (IQR 9.0-15.4) (p<0.001). In cohort 2 only there was a statistically significant reduction in length of stay (mean (SD) 4.3±1.5 post-ERAS vs 4.6±1.2 pre-ERAS, p=0.026). Despite stable readmission rates, there were significantly more serious complications reported in cohort 1 post-ERAS. CONCLUSIONS ERAS increased adherence to current standards in peri-operative management with significant reduction in fasting times for both solids and fluids, and peri-operative fluid administration. Length of stay was reduced in patients with suspicious pelvic tumor. Despite serious complications being common in patients with advanced disease undergoing debulking surgery, a causal relationship with the ERAS protocol could not be established. Implementing ERAS and continuous performance auditing are crucial to advancing peri-operative care of patients with ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristina Lindemann
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Andreas Kleppe
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | | | | | - Yun Yong Wang
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Sara L Walcott
- Department of Clinical Service, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Odd Mjåland
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Gerd-Anita Navestad
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Silje Hermanrud
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Knut Erling Juul-Hansen
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ulf Kongsgaard
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kamei Y, Kobayashi E, Nakatani E, Shiomi M, Sawada M, Kakuda M, Toda A, Nakagawa S, Hiramatsu K, Kinose Y, Takiuchi T, Miyoshi A, Kodama M, Hashimoto K, Kimura T, Ueda Y, Sawada K, Kimura T. A single institution's experience with minimally invasive surgery for ovarian cancer, and a systematic meta-analysis of the literature. Int J Clin Oncol 2023; 28:794-803. [PMID: 37115425 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-023-02320-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2022] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study assesses the feasibility of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for well-selected epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients. METHODS We performed a review of data prospectively collected from a single center from 2017 to 2022. Only patients with histologically confirmed EOC, with a tumor diameter of less than 10 cm, were eligible. We also performed a meta-analysis of similar studies comparing the outcomes of laparoscopy and laparotomy. We used MINORS (Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies) to assess the risk of bias and calculated the odds ratio or mean difference. RESULTS Eighteen patients were included; 13 in re-staging group, four in PDS group, and one in IDS group. All achieved complete cytoreduction. One case was converted to laparotomy. The median number of removed pelvic lymph nodes was 25 (range 16-34), and 32 (range 19-44) for para-aortic nodes. There were two (15.4%) intraoperative urinary tract injuries. The median follow-up was 35 months (range 1-53). Recurrence was observed in one case (7.7%). Thirteen articles for early-stage ovarian cancer were included in our meta-analysis. Analysis of the pooled results found that MIS had a higher frequency of spillage (OR, 2.15; 95% CI 1.27-3.64). No differences were observed in recurrence, complications, or up-staging. CONCLUSIONS Our experience supports the possibility of conducting MIS for EOC in well-selected patients. Except for spillage, our meta-analysis findings are consistent with previous reports, the majority of which were also retrospective. Ultimately, randomized clinical trials will be needed to authenticate the safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuji Kamei
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka Suita, Osaka, 567-0871, Japan
| | - Eiji Kobayashi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka Suita, Osaka, 567-0871, Japan.
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oita University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1, Hasamamachiidaigaoka Yufu, Oita, 879-5503, Japan.
| | - Eiji Nakatani
- Division of Statistical Analysis, Research Support Center, Shizuoka General Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Mayu Shiomi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka Suita, Osaka, 567-0871, Japan
| | - Masaaki Sawada
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka Suita, Osaka, 567-0871, Japan
| | - Mamoru Kakuda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka Suita, Osaka, 567-0871, Japan
| | - Aska Toda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka Suita, Osaka, 567-0871, Japan
| | - Satoshi Nakagawa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka Suita, Osaka, 567-0871, Japan
| | - Kosuke Hiramatsu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka Suita, Osaka, 567-0871, Japan
| | - Yasuto Kinose
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka Suita, Osaka, 567-0871, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Takiuchi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka Suita, Osaka, 567-0871, Japan
| | - Ai Miyoshi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka Suita, Osaka, 567-0871, Japan
| | - Michiko Kodama
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka Suita, Osaka, 567-0871, Japan
| | - Kae Hashimoto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka Suita, Osaka, 567-0871, Japan
| | - Toshihiro Kimura
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka Suita, Osaka, 567-0871, Japan
| | - Yutaka Ueda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka Suita, Osaka, 567-0871, Japan
| | - Kenjiro Sawada
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka Suita, Osaka, 567-0871, Japan
| | - Tadashi Kimura
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka Suita, Osaka, 567-0871, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Huang D, Harrison R, Curtis E, Mirabadi N, Chen GY, Alexandridis R, Barroilhet L, Rose S, Hartenbach E, Al-Niami A. Beyond post-operative readmissions: analysis of the impact of unplanned readmissions during primary treatment of advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer on long-term oncology outcome. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2023; 33:741-748. [PMID: 36808044 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-003765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple studies have assessed post-operative readmissions in advanced ovarian cancer. OBJECTIVE To evaluate all unplanned readmissions during the primary treatment period of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer, and the impact of readmission on progression-free survival. METHODS This was a single institution retrospective study from January 2008 to October 2018. Χ2/Fisher's exact and t-test, or Kruskal-Wallis test were used. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the effect of covariates in progression-free survival analysis. RESULTS A total of 484 patients (279 primary cytoreductive surgery, 205 neoadjuvant chemotherapy) were analyzed. In total, 272 of 484 (56%; 37% primary cytoreductive surgery, 32% neoadjuvant chemotherapy, p=0.29) patients were readmitted during the primary treatment period. Overall, 42.3% of the readmissions were surgery related, 47.8% were chemotherapy related, and 59.6% were cancer related but not related to surgery or chemotherapy, and each readmission could qualify for more than one reason. Readmitted patients had a higher rate of chronic kidney disease (4.1% vs 1.0%, p=0.038). Post-operative, chemotherapy, and cancer-related readmissions were similar between the two groups. However, the percentage of inpatient treatment days due to unplanned readmission was twice as high for primary cytoreductive surgery at 2.2% vs 1.3% for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p<0.001). Despite longer readmissions in the primary cytoreductive surgery group, Cox regression analysis demonstrated that readmissions did not affect progression-free survival (HR=1.22, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.51; p=0.08). Primary cytoreductive surgery, higher modified Frailty Index, grade 3 disease, and optimal cytoreduction were associated with longer progression-free survival. CONCLUSIONS In this study, 35% of the women with advanced ovarian cancer had at least one unplanned readmission during the entire treatment time. Patients treated by primary cytoreductive surgery spent more days during readmission than those with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Readmissions did not affect progression-free survival and may not be valuable as a quality metric.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dandi Huang
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA .,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Ross Harrison
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Erin Curtis
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Nina Mirabadi
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.,Department of General Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Grace Yi Chen
- Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Roxana Alexandridis
- Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Lisa Barroilhet
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Stephen Rose
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Ellen Hartenbach
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Ahmed Al-Niami
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zheng S, Huang W, Li N, Shen Y, Wang X, Chen T. Highly specific selenium nanosystems for fluorescent image-guided rapid diagnosis and pathological grading of ovarian malignant tumors. CHINESE CHEM LETT 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2022.107764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
6
|
Laios A, Kalampokis E, Johnson R, Munot S, Thangavelu A, Hutson R, Broadhead T, Theophilou G, Leach C, Nugent D, De Jong D. Factors Predicting Surgical Effort Using Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Advanced Stage Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14143447. [PMID: 35884506 PMCID: PMC9316555 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14143447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2022] [Revised: 07/04/2022] [Accepted: 07/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Surgical cytoreduction for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is a complex procedure. Encompassed within the performance skills to achieve surgical precision, intra-operative surgical decision-making remains a core feature. The use of eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) could potentially interpret the influence of human factors on the surgical effort for the cytoreductive outcome in question; (2) Methods: The retrospective cohort study evaluated 560 consecutive EOC patients who underwent cytoreductive surgery between January 2014 and December 2019 in a single public institution. The eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and Deep Neural Network (DNN) algorithms were employed to develop the predictive model, including patient- and operation-specific features, and novel features reflecting human factors in surgical heuristics. The precision, recall, F1 score, and area under curve (AUC) were compared between both training algorithms. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) framework was used to provide global and local explainability for the predictive model; (3) Results: A surgical complexity score (SCS) cut-off value of five was calculated using a Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) curve, above which the probability of incomplete cytoreduction was more likely (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.644; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.598−0.69; sensitivity and specificity 34.1%, 86.5%, respectively; p = 0.000). The XGBoost outperformed the DNN assessment for the prediction of the above threshold surgical effort outcome (AUC = 0.77; 95% [CI] 0.69−0.85; p < 0.05 vs. AUC 0.739; 95% [CI] 0.655−0.823; p < 0.95). We identified “turning points” that demonstrated a clear preference towards above the given cut-off level of surgical effort; in consultant surgeons with <12 years of experience, age <53 years old, who, when attempting primary cytoreductive surgery, recorded the presence of ascites, an Intraoperative Mapping of Ovarian Cancer score >4, and a Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Index >7, in a surgical environment with the optimization of infrastructural support. (4) Conclusions: Using XAI, we explain how intra-operative decisions may consider human factors during EOC cytoreduction alongside factual knowledge, to maximize the magnitude of the selected trade-off in effort. XAI techniques are critical for a better understanding of Artificial Intelligence frameworks, and to enhance their incorporation in medical applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandros Laios
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK; (R.J.); (S.M.); (A.T.); (R.H.); (T.B.); (G.T.); (D.N.); (D.D.J.)
- Correspondence:
| | | | - Racheal Johnson
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK; (R.J.); (S.M.); (A.T.); (R.H.); (T.B.); (G.T.); (D.N.); (D.D.J.)
| | - Sarika Munot
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK; (R.J.); (S.M.); (A.T.); (R.H.); (T.B.); (G.T.); (D.N.); (D.D.J.)
| | - Amudha Thangavelu
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK; (R.J.); (S.M.); (A.T.); (R.H.); (T.B.); (G.T.); (D.N.); (D.D.J.)
| | - Richard Hutson
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK; (R.J.); (S.M.); (A.T.); (R.H.); (T.B.); (G.T.); (D.N.); (D.D.J.)
| | - Tim Broadhead
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK; (R.J.); (S.M.); (A.T.); (R.H.); (T.B.); (G.T.); (D.N.); (D.D.J.)
| | - Georgios Theophilou
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK; (R.J.); (S.M.); (A.T.); (R.H.); (T.B.); (G.T.); (D.N.); (D.D.J.)
| | - Chris Leach
- School of Human & Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, UK;
- Department of Psychology Services, South West Yorkshire Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, The Laura Mitchell Health & Wellbeing Centre, Halifax HX1 1YR, UK
| | - David Nugent
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK; (R.J.); (S.M.); (A.T.); (R.H.); (T.B.); (G.T.); (D.N.); (D.D.J.)
| | - Diederick De Jong
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK; (R.J.); (S.M.); (A.T.); (R.H.); (T.B.); (G.T.); (D.N.); (D.D.J.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Huepenbecker SP, Meyer LA. Our dual responsibility of improving quality and questioning the metrics: Reflections on 30-day readmission rate as a quality indicator. Gynecol Oncol 2022; 165:1-3. [PMID: 35346424 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah P Huepenbecker
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Larissa A Meyer
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sia TY, Wen T, Cham S, Friedman AM, Wright JD. Effect of frailty on postoperative readmissions and cost of care for ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2020; 159:426-433. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.08.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2020] [Accepted: 08/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
|
9
|
Kanbergs AN, Manning-Geist BL, Pelletier A, Sullivan MW, Del Carmen MG, Horowitz NS, Growdon WB, Clark RM, Muto MG, Worley MJ. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy does not disproportionately influence post-operative complication rates or time to chemotherapy in obese patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2020; 159:687-691. [PMID: 32951891 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.09.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2020] [Accepted: 09/06/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) disproportionately benefits obese patients. METHODS Data were collected from stage IIIC-IV ovarian cancer patients treated between 01/2010-07/2015. We performed univariate/multivariate logistic regression analyses with post-operative infection, readmission, any postoperative complication, and time to chemotherapy as outcomes. An interaction term was included in models, to determine if the effect of NACT on post-operative complications was influenced by obesity status. RESULTS Of 507 patients, 115 (22.6%) were obese and 392 (77.3%) were non-obese (obese defined as BMI ≥30). Among obese patients undergoing primary debulking surgery (PDS) vs. NACT, rates of postoperative infection were 42.9% vs. 30.8% (p = 0.12), 30-day readmission 30.2% vs. 11.5% (p < 0.02), and any post-operative complication were 44.4% vs 30.8% (p = 0.133). Among non-obese patients undergoing PDS vs. NACT, rates of post-operative infection were 20.0% vs. 12.9% (p = 0.057), 30-day readmission 16.9% vs. 9.2% (p = 0.02), and any post-operative complication were 19.4% vs 28% (p = 0.044). Obesity was associated with post-operative infection (OR 2.3; 95%CI 1.22-4.33), 30-day readmission/reoperation (OR 2.27; 95%CI 1.08-3.21) and the development of any post-operative complication (OR 2.1; CI 1.13-3.74). However, there was not a significant interaction between obesity and NACT in any of the models predicting post-operative complications. CONCLUSIONS The decision to use NACT should not be predicated on obesity alone, as the reduction in post-operative complications in obese patients is similar to non-obese patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexa N Kanbergs
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Vincent Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
| | - Beryl L Manning-Geist
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Vincent Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Andrea Pelletier
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Mackenzie W Sullivan
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Vincent Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Marcela G Del Carmen
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Vincent Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Neil S Horowitz
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Whitfield B Growdon
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Vincent Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Rachel M Clark
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Vincent Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Michael G Muto
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Michael J Worley
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Fotopoulou C, Rinne N, Ghirardi V, Cunnea P, Drosou A, Tzovaras D, Giudice MT, Scambia G, Fagotti A. Value of pre-existent bacterial colonization in patients with advanced/relapsed ovarian neoplasms undergoing cytoreductive surgery: a multicenter observational study (BONSAI). Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020; 30:1562-1568. [PMID: 32817201 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2020] [Revised: 06/24/2020] [Accepted: 06/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE As an increasing number of patients with advanced/relapsed ovarian cancer need extensive cytoreductive procedures, there is an increasing number of complex cases collected in accredited tertiary cancer centers. With nosocomial infections and bacterial colonizations being a significant challenge in these patient cohorts, we aimed to evaluate the risk such infections pose to surgical outcome. METHODS Prospective assessment of pathological bacterial colonization (vaginal, umbilical/groin, intraperitoneal, urine, oral/nose cavity) in patients who underwent open cytoreductive surgery for advanced/relapsed ovarian cancer in two large European tertiary referral centers for gynecologic malignancies. We recruited patients at initial diagnosis with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage III and IV ovarian cancer and patients undergoing surgery for relapse. Swabs or cultures were taken from the following sites: vagina, groin and/or umbilicus, urine, intraperitoneal, mouth and/or nose. Only evidence of pathogenic bacteria was considered positive for bacterial colonization. RESULTS A total of 172 primary advanced (70.9%) or relapsed (29.1%) ovarian cancer patients were included; 63.4% of them had received chemotherapy±additional targeted agents (16.3%) by the time of cytoreduction. 39.5% of the patients had a long-term vascular access line in situ. A bowel resection was performed in 44.8% and a splenectomy in 16.3% of the patients. Predefined surgical morbidity and mortality were 22.3% and 0%, respectively. Forty-one patients (23.8%) screened positive for pathogenic bacterial colonization with the presence of long-term intravenous access as the only independent risk factor identified (OR 2.34; 95% CI 1.05 to 5.34; p=0.04). Type of systemic treatments, previous bowel resections, previous hospitalizations, and patient demographics did not appear to significantly impact the risk of bacterial colonization. Furthermore, pathogenic bacterial colonization was shown to have no significant effect on peri-operative infection-related complications such as abscesses, wound infection, pneumonia, relaparotomy, or anastomotic leak. CONCLUSIONS A total of 24% of patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery for ovarian cancer were confirmed positive for pathogenic bacterial colonization. The presence of long-term intravenous access was identified as the only significant risk factor for that, however the presence of pathogenic bacterial colonization per se did not seem to adversely affect outcome of cytoreductive effort or increase perioperative infection related complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Fotopoulou
- Gynaecologic Oncology, Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London Faculty of Medicine, London, UK
| | - Natasha Rinne
- Gynaecologic Oncology, Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London Faculty of Medicine, London, UK
| | - Valentina Ghirardi
- Istituto di Ginecologia e Ostetricia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.,Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Paulea Cunnea
- Gynaecologic Oncology, Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London Faculty of Medicine, London, UK
| | - Anastasis Drosou
- Centre for Research & Technology Hellas, Information Technologies Institute, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Tzovaras
- Centre for Research & Technology Hellas, Information Technologies Institute, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Maria Teresa Giudice
- Istituto di Ginecologia e Ostetricia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.,Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Anna Fagotti
- Istituto di Ginecologia e Ostetricia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.,Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Mardock AL, Rudasill SE, Lai TS, Sanaiha Y, Wong DH, Sinno AK, Benharash P, Cohen JG. Readmissions after ovarian cancer cytoreduction surgery: The first 30 days and beyond. J Surg Oncol 2020; 122:1199-1206. [PMID: 32700323 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2020] [Revised: 06/13/2020] [Accepted: 07/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Postoperative readmissions are often used to assess quality of surgical care. This study compared 30-day vs 31- to 90-day readmission following surgery for ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer. METHODS This retrospective study of the 2010-2015 Nationwide Readmissions Database characterized 90-day readmissions following cytoreductive surgery for these cancers. Each patient's first postoperative hospitalization was included. Univariate analysis compared patient demographics and reasons for readmission. Multivariable regression identified independent predictors of readmission. RESULTS Of an estimated 76 652 patients, 10 264 (13.4%) were readmitted within 30 days, and 6942 (9.1%) between 31 and 90 days. The 30-day readmissions were more frequently associated with postoperative infection, while 31- to 90-day readmissions were more frequently associated with renal or hematologic diagnoses. Predictors of any 90-day readmission included index hospitalization longer than 7 days (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 1.61 [1.48-1.75], P < .001), extended surgical procedure (AOR 1.41 [1.30-1.53], P < .001), pulmonary circulation disorder (AOR = 1.34 [1.13-1.60], P = .001), and diabetes mellitus (AOR = 1.12 [1.02-1.24], P = .020). CONCLUSIONS Readmission rates remain high during the 31- to 90-day postoperative period in ovarian cancer patients, although these readmissions are less frequently related to postoperative complications. Prospective study is merited to optimize surveillance beyond the initial 30 days after ovarian cancer surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra L Mardock
- Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories (CORELAB), David Geffen School of Medicine, Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Sarah E Rudasill
- Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories (CORELAB), David Geffen School of Medicine, Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Tiffany S Lai
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Yas Sanaiha
- Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories (CORELAB), David Geffen School of Medicine, Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Deanna H Wong
- David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Abdulrahman K Sinno
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Miami, Miami, Florida
| | - Peyman Benharash
- Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories (CORELAB), David Geffen School of Medicine, Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Joshua G Cohen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Dottino JA, He W, Sun CC, Zhao H, Fu S, Rauh-Hain JA, Suidan RS, Lu KH, Giordano SH, Meyer LA. National trends in bowel and upper abdominal procedures in ovarian cancer surgery. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020; 30:1195-1202. [PMID: 32616627 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2020] [Revised: 04/24/2020] [Accepted: 04/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In the United States, trends in the initial treatment approach for ovarian cancer reflect a shift in paradigm toward the increased use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval cytoreductive surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the trends in surgical cytoreductive procedures in ovarian cancer patients who underwent either primary or interval cytoreductive surgery. METHODS This retrospective, population-based study examined patients with stage III/IV ovarian cancer diagnosed between January 2000 and December 2013 identified using SEER-Medicare. Small or large bowel resection, ostomy creation, and upper abdominal procedures were identified using relevant billing codes and compared over time. A 1:1 primary and interval cytoreductive propensity matched cohort was created using demographic and clinical variables. 30-day complications and the use of acute care services were compared. RESULTS A total of 5417 women were identified. 34% underwent bowel resections, 16% ostomy creation, and 8% upper abdominal procedures. There was an increase in bowel resections and upper abdominal procedures from 2000 to 2013 in patients who underwent primary cytoreductive surgery. Compared with patients who received primary cytoreduction, patients who underwent interval cytoreductive surgery were less likely to undergo bowel resection (OR=0.50; 95% CI [0.41, 0.61]) or ostomy creation (OR=0.48; 95% CI [0.42, 0.56]). Upper abdominal procedures did not differ between groups. For patients who underwent primary cytoreductive surgery, these procedures were associated with intensive care unit stay (4.6% vs <2%, P<0.01). In both primary and interval cytoreductive surgery patients, the receipt of bowel and upper abdominal procedures was associated with multiple 30-day postoperative complications and higher rates of readmission and emergency room visits. CONCLUSIONS The performance of upper abdominal procedures in ovarian cancer patients increased from 2000 to 2013. Interval cytoreductive surgery was associated with decreased likelihood of bowel surgery. In matched primary and interval cytoreductive surgery cohorts, the receipt of these procedures were associated with the increased likelihood of postoperative complications and use of acute care services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph A Dottino
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Weiguo He
- Department of Health Services Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Charlotte C Sun
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Hui Zhao
- Department of Health Services Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Shuangshuang Fu
- Department of Health Services Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jose Alejandro Rauh-Hain
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Rudy S Suidan
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Karen H Lu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sharon H Giordano
- Department of Health Services Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Larissa A Meyer
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Cham S, Wen T, Friedman A, Wright JD. Fragmentation of postoperative care after surgical management of ovarian cancer at 30 days and 90 days. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020; 222:255.e1-255.e20. [PMID: 31520627 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2019] [Revised: 09/02/2019] [Accepted: 09/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fragmentation of care, wherein a patient is discharged from an index hospital and undergoes an unexpected readmission to a nonindex hospital, is associated with increased risk of adverse outcomes. Fragmentation has not been well-characterized in ovarian cancer. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to assess risk factors and outcomes that are associated with fragmentation of care among women who undergo surgical treatment of ovarian cancer. STUDY DESIGN The Nationwide Readmission Database was used to identify all-cause 30-day and 90-day postoperative readmissions after surgical management of ovarian cancer from 2010-2014. Postoperative fragmentation was defined as readmission to a hospital other than the index hospital of the initial surgery. Multivariable regression analyses were used to identify predictors of fragmentation in both 30-day and 90-day readmissions. Similarly, multivariable models were developed to determine the association between fragmentation and death among women who were readmitted. RESULTS A total of 10,445 patients (13.3%) were readmitted at 30 days, and 14,124 patients (18.0%) were readmitted at 90 days. Of these, there was a 20.8% and 25.7% rate of postoperative care fragmentation for 30-day and 90-day readmissions, respectively. Patient risk factors that were associated with fragmented postoperative care included Medicare insurance, lower income quartiles, and nonroutine discharge to facility. Hospital factors that were associated with decreased risk of fragmentation included operation at a metropolitan teaching hospital and performance of extended procedures. Cost and length of stay for the readmission were similar among those who had fragmented and nonfragmented readmissions at both 30 and 90 days. Although there was no association between death and fragmentation for patients who were readmitted within 30 days (odds ratio, 1.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.93-1.51), patients who had a fragmented readmission at 90 days were 22% more likely to die than those who were readmitted at 90 days to their index hospital (odds ratio, 1.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.49). CONCLUSION Fragmentation of care is common in women with ovarian cancer who require postoperative readmission. Fragmented postoperative care is associated with an increased risk of death among women who are readmitted within 90 days of surgery.
Collapse
|
14
|
Hall M, Savvatis K, Nixon K, Kyrgiou M, Hariharan K, Padwick M, Owens O, Cunnea P, Campbell J, Farthing A, Stumpfle R, Vazquez I, Watson N, Krell J, Gabra H, Rustin G, Fotopoulou C. Maximal-Effort Cytoreductive Surgery for Ovarian Cancer Patients with a High Tumor Burden: Variations in Practice and Impact on Outcome. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 26:2943-2951. [PMID: 31243666 PMCID: PMC6682567 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07516-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to compare the outcomes of two distinct patient populations treated within two neighboring UK cancer centers (A and B) for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). METHODS A retrospective analysis of all new stages 3 and 4 EOC patients treated between January 2013 and December 2014 was performed. The Mayo Clinic surgical complexity score (SCS) was applied. Cox regression analysis identified the impact of treatment methods on survival. RESULTS The study identified 249 patients (127 at center A and 122 in centre B) without significant differences in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage (FIGO 4, 29.7% at centers A and B), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (ECOG < 2, 89.9% at centers A and B), or histology (serous type in 84.1% at centers A and B). The patients at center A were more likely to undergo surgery (87% vs 59.8%; p < 0.001). The types of chemotherapy and the patients receiving palliative treatment alone were equivalent between the two centers (3.6%). The median SCS was significantly higher at center A (9 vs 2; p < 0.001) with greater tumor burden (9 vs 6 abdominal fields involved; p < 0.001), longer median operation times (285 vs 155 min; p < 0.001), and longer hospital stays (9 vs 6 days; p < 0.001), but surgical morbidity and mortality were equivalent. The independent predictors of reduced overall survival (OS) were non-serous histology (hazard ratio [HR], 1.6; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-2.61), ECOG higher than 2 (HR, 1.9; 95% CI 1.15-3.13), and palliation alone (HR, 3.43; 95% CI 1.51-7.81). Cytoreduction, of any timing, had an independent protective impact on OS compared with chemotherapy alone (HR, 0.31 for interval surgery and 0.39 for primary surgery), even after adjustment for other prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS Incorporating surgery into the initial EOC management, even for those patients with a greater tumor burden and more disseminated disease, may require more complex procedures and more resources in terms of theater time and hospital stay, but seems to be associated with a significant prolongation of the patients overall survival compared with chemotherapy alone.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell/mortality
- Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell/pathology
- Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell/surgery
- Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous/mortality
- Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous/pathology
- Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous/surgery
- Adult
- Aged
- Aged, 80 and over
- Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous/mortality
- Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous/pathology
- Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous/surgery
- Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures/mortality
- Endometrial Neoplasms/mortality
- Endometrial Neoplasms/pathology
- Endometrial Neoplasms/surgery
- Female
- Follow-Up Studies
- Humans
- Middle Aged
- Ovarian Neoplasms/mortality
- Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology
- Ovarian Neoplasms/surgery
- Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards
- Prognosis
- Retrospective Studies
- Survival Rate
- Tumor Burden
- Young Adult
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcia Hall
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, Middlesex, UK
| | - Konstantinos Savvatis
- Inherited Cardiovascular Diseases Unit, Barts Heart Centre, London, UK
- William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University, London, UK
| | - Katherine Nixon
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London and West London Gynecological Cancer Centre, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Maria Kyrgiou
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London and West London Gynecological Cancer Centre, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Malcolm Padwick
- West Hertfordshire Gynaecological Cancer Centre, WHH NHS Trust, Watford, UK
| | - Owen Owens
- West Hertfordshire Gynaecological Cancer Centre, WHH NHS Trust, Watford, UK
| | - Paula Cunnea
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London and West London Gynecological Cancer Centre, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Jeremy Campbell
- Department of Anaesthetics, Centre for Perioperative Medicine and Critical Care Research, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Ham House, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
| | - Alan Farthing
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London and West London Gynecological Cancer Centre, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Richard Stumpfle
- Department of Anaesthetics, Centre for Perioperative Medicine and Critical Care Research, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Ham House, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Neale Watson
- Department of Gynaecology, Hillingdon Hospital, Pield Heath Road, Uxbridge, UK
| | - Jonathan Krell
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London and West London Gynecological Cancer Centre, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Hani Gabra
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London and West London Gynecological Cancer Centre, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK
- Early Clinical Development, IMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | - Gordon Rustin
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, Middlesex, UK
| | - Christina Fotopoulou
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London and West London Gynecological Cancer Centre, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK.
- Department of Anaesthetics, Centre for Perioperative Medicine and Critical Care Research, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Ham House, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|