The application of fibrin sealant for the prevention of lymphocele after lymphadenectomy in patients with gynecological malignancies: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Lower Limb Lymphedema Awareness among Gynecological Cancer Patients: An International Survey Supported by the European Network of Gynecological Cancer Advocacy Groups (ENGAGe) Group

INTRODUCTION

Patient awareness of postoperative lymphedema in the field of gynecologic oncology has been poorly documented in the international literature. We wished to capture and document the awareness among gynecological cancer survivors about postoperative lymphedema, including aspects such as the adequacy of perioperative counseling, management, and quality of life.

METHODS

A web-based survey comprising 25 multiple-choice questions was distributed to gynecological cancer advocacy groups within the European Network of Gynecological Cancer Advocacy Groups (ENGAGe) group. The survey was validated in a pilot group of gynecological patients prior to distribution.

RESULTS

Overall, 386 women from 20 countries completed the questionnaire. Only half of the patients (n = 211) knew what lymphedema is, whereas 52% of the respondents stated that they were never informed at their pre-operative assessment about the potential risk of developing lymphedema. Fifty-three percent of those women who were informed about the risk and management of lymphedema received information through self-initiative, connecting mainly with patient groups or online. Approximately 84% of patients with lymphedema reported that they informed their doctor about their symptoms. Ninety-four patients (55.3%, which is not 55% of the 386) were treated for lymphedema. Forty-five women out of 136 reported that lymphedema significantly affected their everyday lives.

DISCUSSION

We report a large lack of awareness and a significant gap of knowledge about the risks and treatment options related to postoperative lymphedema among gynecological cancer survivors. Institutional practice routines and awareness among professionals need to be urgently recalled and adapted to adequately inform and support gynecological cancer patients.

Role for fibrin glue (sealant) in seroma reduction after inguinal lymphadenectomy; a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Seroma is one of the most commonly encountered morbidities after inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND). It causes much nuisance to both patients and doctors and its presence can lead to many complications. This study aimed to evaluate the role and impact of using fibrin glue to decrease seroma formation in patients undergoing ILND.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-two patients underwent ILND for various reasons. The patients were randomly divided into two groups; 16 in each group. In one group, fibrin glue sealant was applied with a dosage of 2 ml per 100 cm² surface area. Drain placement was then performed. In the control group, only drain placement was used. Preoperative, operative and postoperative data were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

There was a significant reduction in the incidence of seroma formation favoring the fibrin glue group when compared to the control group (P = 0.022). There was also a significant reduction of total cumulative amount of serous fluid (P < 0.001), time to remove drains (P < 0.001), and hospital stay (P = 0.012). There was no significant difference between the two groups in occurrences of hematoma, infection or superficial skin edge necrosis.

CONCLUSION

Fibrin glue sealant has a role to play in ILND as it significantly reduced the incidence of seroma formation. Standardization of definition of seroma as well as dosage and technique of fibrin glue have to be reached in future studies to determine the true role of fibrin glue in ILND.

The effect of fibrin glue on the postoperative lymphatic leakage after D2-lymphadenectomy and gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer

Introduction

Disturbance in the lymphatic drainage during D2 dissection is associated with significant morbidity. We aimed to assess the effect of fibrin glue on the reduction of postoperative lymphatic leakage.

Methods

Prospective double-blinded randomized clinical trial with forty patients in each study arm was conducted. All patients diagnosed, staged, and became a candidate for D2 dissection based on NCCN 2019 guideline for gastric cancer. The intervention group received 1 cc of IFABOND® applied to the surgical bed.

Results

The difference between study groups regarding age, gender, tumor stage was insignificant. (All p-values > 0.05). The median daily drainage volume was 120 ml with the first and the third interquartile being 75 and 210 ml, respectively for the intervention group. The control group had median, the first, and the third interquartile of 350, 290, and 420 ml. The difference between daily drainage volumes was statistically significant (p-value < 0.001). The length of hospital stay was significantly different between the two groups. Notably, the intervention group was discharged sooner (median of 7 Vs 9 days, p-value: 0.001).

Conclusion

This study showed the possible role of fibrin glue in reducing postoperative lymphatic leakage after gastrectomy and D2 dissection.

Registration trial number: IRCT20200710048071N1, 2020.08.16

Novel interventional radiological management for lymphatic leakages after gynecologic surgery: lymphangiography and embolization

Post-operative lymphatic leakage is a common complication of a radical gynecologic surgery involving aggressive lymph node dissection. Its manifestation varies from asymptomatic lymphoceles to life-threatening chylous ascites. In the past, nuclear medicine lymphoscintigraphy was the sole imaging modality for the confirmation of the leakage, of which application is limited due to its poor spatial resolution. While a conservative treatment with percutaneous drainage was the mainstream treatment method, surgical exploration was the last resort for the recalcitrant leakages. Recently, there have been a series of innovations in the field of interventional radiology, including intranodal Lipiodol^® lymphangiography, dynamic magnetic resonance (MR) lymphangiography, lymphatic embolization, and mesenteric lymph node lymphangiography. Intranodal Lipiodol^® lymphangiography provides very reliable and secure access to the lymphatic system, while requiring only fundamental skills and equipment available to all interventional radiologists. Besides, Lipiodol^® is being received a spotlight for its potential therapeutic effects on refractory lymphatic leakage. Dynamic MR lymphangiography plays a vital role in the diagnosis and management of non-traumatic lymphatic diseases, as well as in the post-operative lymphatic leakage with its superior contrast, spatial and temporal resolution. Lymphatic embolization is a technique of using N-BCA glue, a liquid embolic agent, for lymphatic leakages. It can be further described as lymphopseudoaneurysm (LPA) embolization or lymph node embolization, according to which structure is being embolized. Lymphatic embolization opened a new realm of possibilities in the field of interventional lymphology, resulting in the development of treatment approaches for chylous ascites and lymphoceles. Mesenteric lymph node lymphangiography offers the opacification of the upstream mesenteric chylous lymphatic system and can detect lymphatic leakage from the intestinal trunk or the more proximal parts of the mesenteric lymphatic system. With the advent of these latest interventional radiological techniques, more comprehensive approaches to the management of recalcitrant post-operative lymphatic leakages have been enabled.

Application of thrombin gel matrix for the prevention of lymphocele in patients with endometrial cancer: A prospective randomized trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate a thrombin gel matrix (TGM), Floseal, for the prevention of lymphocele in patients with endometrial cancer who underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy.

METHODS

A total of 79 consecutive patients with endometrial cancer were randomly allocated to one of two groups: the TGM group and control group. After completion of the lymphadenectomy, 5 mL of Floseal was applied to the bilateral pelvic sidewalls, especially the femoral canal, obturator, and common iliac vessels areas. Computed tomography scans were obtained for lymphocele evaluation 2 months after the surgery.

RESULTS

Three patients from the TGM group, and four patients from the control group were lost during follow-up, and data from 36 participants from each group were analyzed. As the primary outcome, lymphocele developed in 12 patients in both groups (33 %). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of lymphocele and symptomatic lymphocele development. Lymphocele localization was also not different between the two groups, but the diameter of the lymphoceles detected in the TGM group was significantly greater (p = 0.021). The mean drainage days was significantly shorter in the TGM group (p = 0.015). The amount of drainage was also less in the TGM group, but the difference was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Thrombin gel matrix applied to the pelvic sidewalls does not reduce the incidence of symptomatic or asymptomatic lymphoceles after pelvic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer. However, it can reduce the amount of drainage and the number of drainage days so it can help to shorten hospitalization.

A meta-analysis evaluating the intra-operative use of collagen-fibrin sealants during inguino-femoral lymphadenectomy: A new direction in reducing post-operative morbidity or another disappointment?

BACKGROUND

The intra-operative application of collagen-fibrin sealants (CFS) has emerged as a promising intervention to reduce post-operative morbidity associated with inguino-femoral lymph node dissection (IFLND).

AIM

The purpose of this systematic review was to ascertain the efficacy and safety of CFS to reduce lymphatic morbidity after IFLND.

DESIGN

We systematically searched MEDLINE, SCOPUS, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Database to identify all registered articles pertaining to the use of CFS during IFLND spanning the period Jan 1975 to April 2020. A direct-comparison meta-analysis was performed. Odds ratios (OR), standartised mean difference (SMD) and 95%| confidence intervals were calculated using the random-effect model.

RESULTS

A total of six randomised control trials (RCTs) and four observational studies were included in this study. The studies were characterised by significant clinical heterogeneity. The meta-analysis of RCTs showed that the application of CFS did neither decrease the length of drainage [SDM -0.55 (95% CI -1.34 to 0.23), p = 0.17] nor the amount of drained output [SMD 0.46 (95% CI -0.29 to 1.20), p = 0.23]. No significant different was found concerning the incidence of lymphocele(s) formation [OR 0.96 (95% CI 0.56-1.65), p = 0.88] or other wound complications. The safety profile of CFS was favourable.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that the use of CFS was not associated with difference in the incidence of lymphatic morbidity related to IFLND. In light of the limited data available and the high inter-study heterogeneity, this evidence should be interpreted with caution. More high quality RCTs are warranted to draw firmer conclusions.

Surgical Strategies for Lymphocele Prevention in Minimally Invasive Radical Prostatectomy and Lymph Node Dissection: A Systematic Review

Purpose: Pelvic lymph node dissection is an important step during robotic radical prostatectomy. The collection of lymphatic fluid (lymphocele) is the most common complication with potentially severe impact; therefore, different strategies have been proposed to reduce its incidence. Materials and Methods: In this systematic review, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and NIH Registry of Clinical Trials were searched for articles including the following interventions: transperitoneal vs extraperitoneal approach, any reconfiguration of the peritoneum, the use of pelvic drains, and the use of different sealing techniques and sealing agents. The outcome evaluated was the incidence of symptomatic lymphocele. Randomized, nonrandomized, and/or retrospective studies were included. Results: Twelve studies were included (including one ongoing randomized clinical trial). Because of heterogeneity of included studies, no meta-analysis was performed. No significant impact was reported by different sealing techniques and agents or by surgical approach. Three retrospective, nonrandomized studies showed a potential benefit of peritoneal reconfiguration to maximize the peritoneal surface of reabsorption. Conclusion: Lymphocele formation is a multistep and multifactorial event; high-quality literature analyzing risk factors and preventive measures is rather scarce. Peritoneal reconfiguration could represent a reasonable option that deserves further evaluation; no other preventive measure is supported by current evidence.