1
|
Yavuz O, Kurt S, Özgözen ME, Akdöner A. The impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on the clinical presentation of tubal ectopic pregnancies: a retrospective cohort study. REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA (1992) 2024; 70:e20231445. [PMID: 38775533 PMCID: PMC11101178 DOI: 10.1590/1806-9282.20231445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We aimed to assess the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on the clinical presentation of tubal ectopic pregnancies. METHODS This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary center and included 76 cases of tubal ectopic pregnancies. The study period was divided into two groups: the pre-coronavirus disease group (January 2018 to February 2020, Group 1; n=47, 61.8%) and the coronavirus disease group (March 2020 to February 2022, Group 2; n=29, 38.2%). Subgroup analysis was also performed for tubal ruptured ectopic pregnancies as Group 1 (n=15, 62.5%) and Group 2 (n=9, 37.5%). RESULTS No statistically significant differences were observed between the pre-coronavirus disease and coronavirus disease groups in terms of demographic characteristics. Although the serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin level was found to be higher in Group 2, the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.7). The groups appeared to be similar in treatment management, duration of hospitalization, and blood transfusion needs (p=0.3, p=0.6, and p=0.5, respectively). Additionally, no significant difference was observed between the groups in the evaluation of ruptured ectopic pregnancies (p=0.5). In the subgroup analysis of tubal ruptured ectopic pregnancies, no significant difference was observed. CONCLUSION To the best of our knowledge, there are few studies evaluating the effect of the pandemic on tubal ectopic pregnancies in the literature. Although we did not report statistically significant differences between groups in our study, given the potential prolonged duration of the pandemic, healthcare professionals should actively prompt their patients to seek necessary medical assistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Onur Yavuz
- Dokuz Eylül University, School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology – İzmir, Turkey
- Dokuz Eylül University Hospital – İzmir, Turkey
| | - Sefa Kurt
- Dokuz Eylül University, School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology – İzmir, Turkey
- Dokuz Eylül University Hospital – İzmir, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Eyüphan Özgözen
- Dokuz Eylül University, School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology – İzmir, Turkey
- Dokuz Eylül University Hospital – İzmir, Turkey
| | - Aslı Akdöner
- Dokuz Eylül University, School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology – İzmir, Turkey
- Dokuz Eylül University Hospital – İzmir, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Campos V, Paiva G, Padron L, Freitas F, Pedrotti LG, Sun SY, Viggiano M, Oliveira L, Rohr L, Madi JM, Arrym TP, Oliveira P, Dos Santos Esteves APV, Junior JA, Filho JR, Elias KM, Horowitz NS, Braga A, Berkowitz RS. Influence of COVID-19 pandemic on molar pregnancy and postmolar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: An observational study. BJOG 2023; 130:292-302. [PMID: 36209485 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.17313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2022] [Revised: 09/11/2022] [Accepted: 09/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess whether the incidence and aggressiveness of molar pregnancy (MP) and postmolar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) changed during the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN Observational study with two separate designs: retrospective multicentre cohort of patients with MP/postmolar GTN and a cross-sectional analysis, with application of a questionnaire. SETTING Six Brazilian Reference Centres on gestational trophoblastic disease. POPULATION 2662 patients with MP/postmolar GTN treated from March-December/2015-2020 were retrospectively evaluated and 528 of these patients answered a questionnaire. METHODS Longitudinal retrospective multicentre study of patients diagnosed with MP/ postmolar GTN at presentation and a cross-sectional analysis, with application of a questionnaire, exclusive to patients treated during the period of study, to assess living and health conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic compared with previous years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The incidence of MP/postmolar GTN. RESULTS Compared with the last 5 pre-pandemic years, MP/postmolar GTN incidence remained stable during 2020 (COVID-19 pandemic). Multivariable logistic regression, adjusted for the patient age, showed that during 2020, presentation with MP was more likely to be >10 weeks of gestation (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.90-3.29, P < 0.001), have a pre-evacuation hCG level ≥100 000 iu/l (aOR 1.77, 95% CI 1.38-2.28, P < 0.001) and time to the initiation of chemotherapy ≥7 months (aOR 1.86, 95% CI 1.01-3.43, P = 0.047) when compared with 2015-2019. CONCLUSIONS Although the incidence of MP/postmolar GTN remained stable during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil, the pandemic was associated with greater gestational age at MP diagnosis and more protracted delays in initiation of chemotherapy for postmolar GTN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa Campos
- Department of Maternal Child, Postgraduate Program in Medical Sciences, Fluminense Federal University, Niterói, Brazil.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Postgraduate Program in Perinatal Health, Faculty of Medicine, Maternity School of Rio de Janeiro Federal University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Gabriela Paiva
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Postgraduate Program in Perinatal Health, Faculty of Medicine, Maternity School of Rio de Janeiro Federal University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Lilian Padron
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Postgraduate Program in Perinatal Health, Faculty of Medicine, Maternity School of Rio de Janeiro Federal University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Fernanda Freitas
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Postgraduate Program in Perinatal Health, Faculty of Medicine, Maternity School of Rio de Janeiro Federal University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | - Sue Yazaki Sun
- Department of Obstetrics, Paulista School of Medicine, São Paulo Federal University, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Maurício Viggiano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Goiania Trophoblastic Disease Center (Clinics Hospital of Goias Federal University), Goiania, Brazil
| | - Larissa Oliveira
- Division of Recife Trophoblastic Disease Center (Clinics Hospital of Pernambuco Federal University), Recife, Brazil
| | - Lucia Rohr
- Division of Recife Trophoblastic Disease Center (Clinics Hospital of Pernambuco Federal University), Recife, Brazil
| | - José Mauro Madi
- Division of Caxias do Sul Trophoblastic Disease Center, General Hospital of Caxias do Sul, School of Medicine, Center for Biological and Health Sciences, Caxias do Sul University, Caxias do Sul, Brazil
| | - Tiago Pedromônico Arrym
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Priscila Oliveira
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Postgraduate Program in Perinatal Health, Faculty of Medicine, Maternity School of Rio de Janeiro Federal University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Ana Paula Vieira Dos Santos Esteves
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Postgraduate Program in Perinatal Health, Faculty of Medicine, Maternity School of Rio de Janeiro Federal University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Joffre Amim Junior
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Postgraduate Program in Perinatal Health, Faculty of Medicine, Maternity School of Rio de Janeiro Federal University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Jorge Rezende Filho
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Postgraduate Program in Perinatal Health, Faculty of Medicine, Maternity School of Rio de Janeiro Federal University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Kevin M Elias
- New England Trophoblastic Disease Center, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Neil S Horowitz
- New England Trophoblastic Disease Center, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Antônio Braga
- Department of Maternal Child, Postgraduate Program in Medical Sciences, Fluminense Federal University, Niterói, Brazil.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Postgraduate Program in Perinatal Health, Faculty of Medicine, Maternity School of Rio de Janeiro Federal University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.,Postgraduate Program in Applied Health Sciences, Vassouras University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Ross S Berkowitz
- New England Trophoblastic Disease Center, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on ectopic pregnancy presentation and treatment: A retrospective cohort study. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 2023; 52:102508. [PMID: 36384217 PMCID: PMC9659410 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2022.102508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2022] [Revised: 10/17/2022] [Accepted: 11/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We examined ectopic pregnancy (EP) incidence, presentation and management, before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, and following initiation of vaccination against COVID-19. STUDY DESIGN In a single-center retrospective cohort study, we compared incidence, presentation and management of EP, between 98 women who presented during the pandemic (March 1 2020 to August 31, 2021), and 94 women diagnosed earlier (March 1 2018 to August 31, 2019). Sub-periods before and after introduction of the vaccination were compared. RESULTS Age and parity were similar between the periods. For the pandemic compared to the earlier period, the median gestational age at EP presentation was higher (6.24 ± 1.25 vs. 5.59 ± 1.24, P<0.001), and the proportions were higher of symptomatic women (42.9% vs. 27.7%, p = 0.035) and urgent laparoscopies (42.9% vs. 24.5%, p = 0.038). In a multivariable linear model, women who presented during the pandemic were more likely to undergo an urgent laparoscopy [OR 2.30, 95%CI (1.20-4.41)], P = 0.012. In urgent surgeries performed during the pandemic compared to the earlier period, the proportion of women with a hemoglobin drop >2 gr/dL was greater (60% vs. 30%, p = 0.024). Statistically significant differences were not found in sonographic or laboratory findings, in rupture or massive hemoperitoneum rates, or in the need for blood transfusion in urgent laparoscopy. Outcomes were similar before and after introduction of vaccinations. CONCLUSION During the pandemic, and even after the introduction of vaccination, women with EP were more likely to undergo urgent surgery, and blood loss was greater. This is likely due to delayed diagnosis.
Collapse
|
5
|
Aiob A, Naskovica K, Amdur Zilberfarb I, Sharon A, Bornstein J, Lowenstein L. Changes in diagnostic sensitivity, incidence and presentation of complete and partial hydatidiform mole over the years. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2022; 274:136-141. [PMID: 35640442 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.05.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2022] [Revised: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Molar pregnancy is the most common type of gestational trophoblastic disease. Several recent reports have described changes in the clinical representation, the incidence and the diagnostic sensitivity of molar pregnancy. These changes could be due to widespread use of transvaginal ultrasound and beta-hCG testing in the management of routine first-trimester investigations. STUDY DESIGN This is a retrospective study of 144 women diagnosed with partial or complete mole at a regional medical center during 2007-2020. Incidence, demographics, clinical features and diagnostic sensitivity were compared between 2007 and 2014 and 2015-2020, and attempts were made to understand the bases of the changes between the time periods. RESULTS Sixty-two moles were diagnosed during 2007-2014 and 82 during 2015-2020. The proportions of complete moles in the respective periods were 65% (40) and 18% (15). From the earlier to the later period, the incidence and proportion of complete moles decreased, and of partial moles, increased. The median gestational age at diagnosis of molar pregnancy was 9.3 weeks. In the later period, women presented less frequently with vaginal bleeding, though this remained the most common presenting symptom. The proportion of women who underwent surgical evacuation of the uterus due to suspected molar pregnancy decreased, as did the proportion of moles that was suspected in ultrasound evaluation (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION The proportion of complete moles decreased between the periods examined. Gestational age at diagnosis was similar to data from 1994 to 2013. Some typical presenting symptoms of molar pregnancy decreased. However, earlier diagnosis of missed abortion can miss diagnoses of molar pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ala Aiob
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Galilee Medical Cente, Israel; Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar Ilan University, Safed, Israel.
| | - Karina Naskovica
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Galilee Medical Cente, Israel
| | | | - Avishalom Sharon
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Galilee Medical Cente, Israel; Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar Ilan University, Safed, Israel
| | - Jacob Bornstein
- Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar Ilan University, Safed, Israel
| | - Lior Lowenstein
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Galilee Medical Cente, Israel; Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar Ilan University, Safed, Israel
| |
Collapse
|