Performance validation of the Mayo triage algorithm applied to individualize surgical management of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

Physical and psychological distress amongst patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

This study compares baseline clinical characteristics, physical function testing, and patient-reported outcomes for patients undergoing primary cytoreductive surgery versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with the goal of better understanding unique patient needs at diagnosis.

METHODS

Patients with suspected advanced stage (IIIC/IV) epithelial ovarian cancer undergoing either primary cytoreductive surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy were enrolled in a single-institution, non-randomized prospective behavioral intervention trial of prehabilitation. Baseline clinical characteristics were abstracted. Physical function was evaluated using the Short Physical Performance Battery, Fried Frailty Index, gait speed, and grip strength. Patient-reported outcomes were evaluated using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System metrics and the Perceived Stress Scale.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in demographics or clinical characteristics between cohorts at enrollment, with the exception of performance status, clinical stage, and albumin. While gait speed and grip strength were lower amongst neoadjuvant chemotherapy patients, there were no significant differences in physical function using the Short Physical Performance Battery and Fried Frailty Index. Patients in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy cohort reported decreased perception of physical function and increased fatigue on Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System metrics. A larger proportion of patients in the neoadjuvant cohort reported severe levels of emotional distress and anxiety, as well as greater perceived stress at diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer present with increased psychosocial distress and decreased perception of physical function at diagnosis and may benefit most from early introduction of supportive care.

Cytoreductive surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer in the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors era-Is it time for a new paradigm shift? A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

In patients with newly diagnosed advanced high-grade serous and endometrioid epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) first-line maintenance therapy with poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) tremendously improved progression-free survival (PFS). Yet, data on the effect of PARPi in proportion to postoperative residual disease status were lacking.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched Medline/Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane databases as well as meeting abstracts until 18th March 2023. Hazard ratios (HRs) alongside their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for PFS were extracted from the studies. A subgroup analysis was conducted to examine the effect of PARPi according to postoperative residual disease.

RESULTS

A total of six phase III randomised controlled trials were included and comprised SOLO 1, PAOLA 1, PRIMA, PRIME, ATHENA-MONO and VELIA. Patients who received PARPi following complete gross resection showed greatest PFS benefit. Compared with placebo, maintenance with PARPi significantly improved PFS in patients with macroscopic residual disease (pooled HR 0.55; 95% CI 0.44-0.68). This magnitude was comparable to that found in patients with complete gross resection (pooled HR 0.53; 95% CI 0.41-0.67).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with macroscopic residual disease benefit from PARPi at the same extent as cases with complete gross resection. However, patients with complete gross resection who were treated with PARPi show the most favourable PFS rates. Hence, the pursuit of achieving complete cytoreduction remains valid in the PARPi era.

Facility level variation in the utilization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with higher surgical morbidity for patients with advanced stage epithelial ovarian carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Investigate outcomes for advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients based on facility-level utilization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).

METHODS

Stage III-IV EOC patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2016 were identified in the National Cancer Database. Percentage of patients managed with NACT was calculated for facilities, reporting ≥120 patients. Facilities with lowest and highest quartile of NACT rate comprised the low and high-utilizing groups. Clinico-pathological characteristics were collected, and appropriate statistical analysis performed.

RESULTS

High- and low-utilizing facilities managed on average 54.1% and 25.4% of patients with NACT respectively. Patients managed at high-utilizing facilities were significantly more likely to be >65 (p = 0.029), have stage IV disease (p < 0.001) and comorbidities (p < 0.001). Patients managed with primary debulking surgery (PDS) at low-utilizing facilities were significantly more likely to be >65, have stage IV disease, and have comorbidities (all, p < 0.001). Patients undergoing PDS at low-utilizing facilities were significantly less likely to achieve complete gross resection (p < 0.001), and were significantly more likely to experience 90-day mortality (p < 0.001), and unplanned 30-day readmission (p < 0.001). After controlling for age, comorbidities, race, insurance status, stage, grade and histology, high-utilizing facilities trended towards better overall survival (OS) (HR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.85-0.99). Overall, patients undergoing PDS had better OS compared to those who had NACT (median 42 vs 27 months, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite treating an EOC population with more advanced disease and comorbidities, high-utilizing facilities have lower surgical morbidity and mortality with no detrimental impact on long-term survival. Careful patient selection to minimize the morbidity and mortality associated with PDS is pivotal.

Validation of a risk-based algorithm to reduce poor operative outcomes after complex surgery for ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

We developed an algorithm that identifies patients at high risk of morbidity/mortality after cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer. We have previously shown that the Mayo triage algorithm reduces operative mortality internally, followed by validation using an external low complexity national dataset. However, validation in a higher complexity surgical setting is required before widespread acceptance of this approach, and this was the goal of our study.

METHODS

We included patients who underwent debulking surgery (including primary or interval debulking surgery) for stage IIIC/IV ovarian cancer between October 2011 and November 2019 (SCORPION trial patients until May 2016 and non-trial patients thereafter) at Fondazione Policlinico A Gemelli, Italy. Using the algorithm, we classified patients as either high-risk or triage-appropriate and compared 30-day grade 3+ complications and 90-day mortality using a χ2 test or Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

A total of 625 patients were included. The mean age was 58.7±11.4 years, 73.6% (n=460) were stage IIIC, and 63.0% (n=394) underwent primary debulking surgery. Surgical complexity was intermediate or high in 82.6% (n=516) of patients (95.7% (n=377) for primary surgery and 60.2% (n=139) for interval surgery), and 20.3% (n=127) were classified as high-risk. When compared with triage-appropriate patients, high-risk patients had (1) a threefold higher rate of 90-day mortality (6.3% vs 2.0%, p=0.02); (2) a higher likelihood of 90-day mortality following a grade 3+ complication (25.9% vs 10.0%, p=0.05); and (3) comparable rates of grade 3+ complications (21.3% vs 16.1%, p=0.17).

CONCLUSION

The evidence-based triage algorithm identifies patients at high risk of morbidity/mortality after cytoreductive surgery. Triage high-risk patients are poor candidates for surgery when complex surgery is required. This algorithm has been validated in heterogeneous settings (internal, national, and international) and degree of surgical complexity. Risk-based decision making should be standard of care when planning surgery for patients with advanced ovarian cancer, whether primary or interval surgery.

Nomogram to predict postoperative complications after cytoreductive surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: A multicenter retrospective cohort study

Objective

To establish nomograms to predict the risk of postoperative complications following cytoreductive surgery in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (AEOC).

Methods

A multicenter retrospective cohort study that included patients with FIGO stage IIIC-IV epithelial ovarian cancer who underwent cytoreductive surgery was designed. By using univariate and multivariate analyses, patient preoperative characteristics were used to predict the risk of postoperative complications. Multivariate modeling was used to develop Nomograms.

Results

Overall, 585 AEOC patients were included for analysis (training cohort = 426, extrapolation cohort = 159). According to the findings, the training cohort observed an incidence of postoperative overall and severe complications of 28.87% and 6.10%, respectively. Modified frailty index (mFI) (OR 1.96 and 2.18), FIGO stage (OR 2.31 and 3.22), and Surgical Complexity Score (SCS) (OR 1.16 and 1.23) were the clinical factors that were most substantially associated to the incidence of overall and severe complications, respectively. The resulting nomograms demonstrated great internal discrimination, good consistency, and stable calibration, with C-index of 0.74 and 0.78 for overall and severe complications prediction, respectively. A satisfactory external discrimination was also indicated by the extrapolation cohort, with the C-index for predicting overall and severe complications being 0.92 and 0.91, respectively.

Conclusions

The risk of considerable postoperative morbidity exists after cytoreductive surgery for AEOC. These two nomograms with good discrimination and calibration might be useful to guide clinical decision-making and help doctors assess the probability of postoperative complications for AEOC patients.

When we open and close: Postoperative outcomes after aborted primary cytoreduction for ovarian cancer

Objective

Little data exists to adequately counsel patients on the postsurgical morbidity and outcomes of an aborted primary debulking (AD) for advance stage epithelial ovarian cancer. Our objectives were to examine the 30-day morbidity of AD, percentage of patients who subsequently undergo neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and interval cytoreductive surgery (ICS), residual disease at ICS, and predictors for complications after AD.

Methods

This was a single-institution retrospective analysis of patients who underwent AD for ovarian cancer from 01/2008 to 12/2020 using ICD-10 diagnoses and procedure codes. Patient demographics, perioperative metrics, and residual disease at ICS were collected. Thirty-day postoperative complications were graded by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Fisher's exact tests compared categorical and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests compared continuous variables. Logistic regression provided unadjusted odds ratios to identify predictors for post-AD complications.

Results

Forty-eight patients underwent AD, and 43 were included for analysis. All had at least stage IIIC high grade serous ovarian cancer. All patients subsequently underwent ICS, with 21 (48.8%) achieving no residual macroscopic disease and 21 (48.8%) to ≤ 1 cm of macroscopic disease. After AD, 16 (37.2%) experienced at least one G ≥ 3 event within the first 30 days. The most common complication was gastrointestinal complications. Preoperative albumin was the only significant predictor for G ≥ 3 complication after AD.

Conclusions

Approximately one-third of patients will experience at least one G ≥ 3 complications after AD. Complications may be anticipated by low preoperative albumin. Patients can be counseled that, after AD, proceeding to subsequent NACT and ICS and achieving optimal debulking is common.