Pelvic exenteration for recurrent or persistent gynecologic malignancies: Clinical and histopathologic factors predicting recurrence and survival in a modern cohort

Perioperative outcomes in gynecologic pelvic exenteration before and after implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery program

OBJECTIVES

To compare perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies before and after implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols.

METHODS

We performed an institutional retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies before (1/1/2006-12/30/2014) and after (1/1/2015-6/30/2023) ERAS implementation. We described ERAS compliance rates. We compared outcomes up to 60 days post-exenteration. Complication grades were defined by the Clavien-Dindo system.

RESULTS

Overall, 105 women underwent pelvic exenteration; 74 (70.4%) in the pre-ERAS and 31 (29.5%) in the ERAS cohorts. There were no differences between cohorts in age, body mass index, race, primary disease site, type of exenteration, urinary diversion, or vaginal reconstruction. All patients had complications, with at least one grade II+ complication in 94.6% of pre-ERAS and 90.3% of ERAS patients. The ERAS cohort had more grade I-II gastrointestinal (61.3% vs 21.6%, p < 0.001) and hematologic (61.3% vs 36.5%, p = 0.030) and grade III-IV renal (29.0% vs 12.2%, p = 0.048) and wound (45.2% vs 18.9%, p = 0.008) complications compared to the pre-ERAS cohort. ERAS patients had a higher rate of ileus (38.7% vs 10.8%, p = 0.002), urinary leak (22.6% vs 5.4%, p = 0.014), pelvic abscess (35.5% vs 10.8%, p = 0.005), postoperative bleeding requiring intervention (61.3% vs 28.4%, p = 0.002), and readmission (71.4% vs 46.5%, p = 0.025). Median ERAS compliance was 60%.

CONCLUSIONS

Pelvic exenteration remains a morbid procedure, and complications were more common in ERAS compared to pre-ERAS cohorts. ERAS protocols should be optimized and tailored to the complexity of pelvic exenteration compared to standard gynecologic oncology ERAS pathways.

Quality of life following pelvic exenteration in neoplasms

BACKGROUND

Pelvic exenteration (PE) is an extensive surgical treatment reserved for advanced or recurrent pelvic neoplasms, with potential impacts on patients' quality of life (QoL) poorly referenced in the literature.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate QoL outcomes among three types of PE.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study assessed 106 patients divided into anterior PE (APE), posterior PE (PPE), or total PE (TPE) groups. QoL was measured using e short form 36 version 2 (SF-36) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) QoL questionnaires. Descriptive and inferential analyses compared questionnaire scores.

RESULTS

The findings unveiled a balance among the three groups concerning demographic variables and comorbidities, with the exception of a male predominance in the APE and TPE cohorts. Notably, the APE group exhibited elevated scores in overall health (assessed via SF-36) and social functioning and diarrhea domains (assessed via QLQ-C30). Moreover, in terms of the fatigue and nausea/vomiting domains (assessed via QLQ-C30), the APE group demonstrated superior QoL compared to the PPE group. Conversely, the PPE group manifested a notably lower QoL in the constipation domain (assessed via QLQ-C30) compared to the other two groups. Additionally, disease recurrence was significantly associated with diminished QoL across multiple domains.

CONCLUSION

APE patients exhibited better QoL than PPE and TPE groups, with disease recurrence adversely affecting QoL.

A systematic review and meta-analysis on mortality rate following total pelvic exenteration in cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Total pelvic exenteration (TPE), an en bloc resection is an ultraradical operation for malignancies, and refers to the removal of organs inside the pelvis, including female reproductive organs, lower urological organs and involved parts of the digestive system. The aim of this meta-analysis is to estimate the intra-operative mortality, in-hospital mortality, 30- and 90-day mortality rate and overall mortality rate (MR) following TPE in colorectal, gynecological, urological, and miscellaneous cancers.

METHODS

This is a systematic review and meta-analysis in which three international databases including Medline through PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science on November 2023 were searched. To screen and select relevant studies, retrieved articles were entered into Endnote software. The required information was extracted from the full text of the retrieved articles by the authors. Effect measures in this study was the intra-operative, in-hospital, and 90-day and overall MR following TPE. All analyzes are performed using Stata software version 16 (Stata Corp, College Station, TX).

RESULTS

In this systematic review, 1751 primary studies retrieved, of which 98 articles (5343 cases) entered into this systematic review. The overall mortality rate was 30.57% in colorectal cancers, 25.5% in gynecological cancers and 12.42% in Miscellaneous. The highest rate of mortality is related to the overall mortality rate of colorectal cancers. The MR in open surgeries was higher than in minimally invasive surgeries, and also in primary advanced cancers, it was higher than in recurrent cancers.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, it can be said that performing TPE in a specialized surgical center with careful patient eligibility evaluation is a viable option for advanced malignancies of the pelvic organs.

Range of Resection in Endometrial Cancer-Clinical Issues of Made-to-Measure Surgery

Endometrial cancer (EC) poses a significant health issue among women, and its incidence has been rising for a couple of decades. Surgery remains its principal treatment method and may have a curative, staging, or palliative aim. The type and extent of surgery depends on many factors, and the risks and benefits should be carefully weighed. While simple hysterectomy might be sufficient in early stage EC, modified-radical hysterectomy is sometimes indicated. In advanced disease, the evidence suggests that, similarly to ovarian cancer, optimal cytoreduction improves survival rate. The role of lymphadenectomy in EC patients has long been a controversial issue. The rationale for systematic lymphadenectomy and the procedure of the sentinel lymph node biopsy are thoroughly discussed. Finally, the impact of the molecular classification and new International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system on EC treatment is outlined. Due to the increasing knowledge on the pathology and molecular features of EC, as well as the new advances in the adjuvant therapies, the surgical management of EC has become more complex. In the modern approach, it is essential to adjust the extent of the surgery to a specific patient, ensuring an optimal, made-to-measure personalized surgery. This narrative review focuses on the intricacies of surgical management of EC and aims at summarizing the available literature on the subject, providing an up-to-date clinical guide.

The Role of Pelvic Exenteration in Cervical Cancer: A Review of the Literature

Pelvic exenteration represents a radical procedure aimed at achieving complete tumor resection with negative margins. Although it is the only therapeutic option for some cases of advanced tumors, it is associated with several perioperative complications. We believe that careful patient selection is related to better oncologic outcomes and lower complication rates. The objectives of this review are to identify the most current indications for this intervention, suggest criteria for case selection, evaluate recommendations for perioperative care, and review oncologic outcomes and potential associated complications. To this end, an analysis of English language articles in PubMed was performed, searching for topics such as the indication for pelvic exenteration for recurrent gynecologic neoplasms selection of oncologic cases, the impact of tumor size and extent on oncologic outcomes, preoperative and postoperative surgical management, surgical complications, and outcomes of overall survival and recurrence-free survival.

Staging of Cervical Cancer: A Practical Approach Using MRI and FDG PET

This review provides a practical approach to the imaging evaluation of patients with cervical cancer (CC), from initial diagnosis to restaging of recurrence, focusing on MRI and FDG PET. The primary updates to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) CC staging system, as well as these updates' relevance to clinical management, are discussed. The recent literature investigating the role of MRI and FDG PET in CC staging and image-guided brachytherapy is summarized. The utility of MRI and FDG PET in response assessment and posttreatment surveillance is described. Important findings on MRI and FDG PET that interpreting radiologists should recognize and report are illustrated. The essential elements of structured reports during various phases of CC management are outlined. Special considerations, including the role of imaging in patients desiring fertility-sparing management, differentiation of CC and endometrial cancer, and unusual CC histologies, are also described. Finally, future research directions including PET/MRI, novel PET tracers, and artificial intelligence applications are highlighted.

Clinical outcomes of pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to analyze morbidity and survival after pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies and evaluate prognostic factors influencing postoperative outcome.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent a pelvic exenteration at the departments of gynecologic oncology of three tertiary care centers in the Netherlands, the Leiden University Medical Centre, the Amsterdam University Medical Centre, and the Netherlands Cancer Institute, during a 20-year period. We determined postoperative morbidity, 2- and 5-year overall survival (OS) and 2- and 5-year progression free survival (PFS), and investigated parameters influencing these outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 90 patients were included. The most common primary tumor was cervical cancer (n = 39, 43.3%). We observed at least one complication in 83 patients (92%). Major complications were seen in 55 patients (61%). Irradiated patients had a higher risk of developing a major complication. Sixty-two (68.9%) required ≥1 readmission. Re-operation was required in 40 patients (44.4%). Median OS was 25 months and median PFS was 14 months. The 2-year OS rate was 51.1% and the 2-year PFS rate was 41.5%. Tumor size, resection margins and pelvic sidewall involvement had a negative impact on OS (HR = 2.159, HR = 2.376, and HR = 1.200, respectively). Positive resection margins and pelvic sidewall involvement resulted in decreased PFS (HR = 2.567 and HR = 3.969, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Postoperative complications after pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies are common, especially in irradiated patients. In this study, a 2-year OS rate of 51.1% was observed. Positive resections margins, tumor size, and pelvic sidewall involvement were related to poor survival outcomes. Adequate selection of patients who will benefit from pelvic exenteration is important.

R0 Resection in Recurrent Gynecologic Malignancy: Pelvic Exenteration and Beyond

OPINION STATEMENT

Pelvic exenteration is a radical surgery, but oftentimes, it is the last curative option for patients with recurrent gynecologic malignancies who have exhausted more conservative therapies. Mortality and morbidity outcomes have improved over time, but there are still significant peri-operative risks. Considerations before pursing pelvic exenteration must include the likelihood of oncologic cure and patients' fitness to undergo such a procedure, particularly given the high rate of surgical morbidity. Pelvic sidewall tumors have been a traditional contraindication for pelvic exenteration due to the difficulty in obtaining negative margins, but the use of laterally extended endopelvic resection and intra-operative radiation therapy allows for more radical resection of recurrent disease. We believe that these procedures to achieve R0 resection can expand the use of curative-intent surgery in recurrent gynecologic cancer, but require the surgical expertise of colleagues in orthopedic and vascular surgery and collaboration with plastic surgery for complex reconstruction and optimization of post-operative healing. Surgery of recurrent gynecologic cancer including pelvic exenteration, requires careful patient selection, pre-operative medical optimization and prehabilitation, and thorough counseling to optimize outcomes, both oncologic and peri-operative. We believe the creation of a well-developed team, including surgical teams and supportive care services, can lead to the best patient outcomes and improved professional satisfaction amongst providers.

Primary vaginal sarcoma in a single center

Objectives

To investigate the clinical characteristics and prognosis of primary vaginal sarcoma.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of patients with primary vaginal sarcoma treated at our center from 2000 to 2020 was conducted.

Results

Fifteen patients were identified, among which 9 (60.0 %) patients had leiomyosarcoma, 2 (13.3 %) patients had Ewing's sarcoma, 2 (13.3 %) patients had rhabdomyosarcoma, 1 (6.7 %) patient had undifferentiated sarcoma, and 1 (6.7 %) patient had malignant peripheral schwannoma. Nine patients presented with vaginal mass that was the most common primary symptoms. Eleven patients received their primary surgery, and 7 of them received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation therapy. The remaining 4 patients received initial chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy because of advanced stage. The distribution by stage was as follows: stage I in 10 patients, stage II in 1 patient, stage III in 2 patients and stage IV in 2 patients. The median follow-up was 43.7 months (10.1-137.5 months). Thirteen patients (86.7 %) had disease extent during follow-up, and among them, 11 patients (11/13, 84.6 %) developed local relapse or adjacent organ metastases, 1 patient (1/13, 7.7 %) developed liver metastases, and the remaining 1 patient (1/13, 7.7 %) developed lung metastases and local relapse during follow-up. Ten (10/13, 76.9 %) patients relapsed within 2 years after diagnosis. Eight patients (8/11, 72.7 %) with local recurrence or adjacent organ metastases received a secondary surgery treatment, and only 2 of them relapsed again. Two-year overall survival (OS) and 5-year OS were 80.0 % and 66.7 %, respectively. Patients with leiomyosarcoma had a tendency toward a better 5-year OS than those with other sarcomas (74.1 % vs 66.7 %, P = 0.307).

Conclusions

Primary vaginal sarcomas are aggressive neoplasms with different presenting characteristics. Surgery is the main treatment for primary vaginal sarcoma and for local relapse vaginal sarcoma.

Primary vaginal sarcoma in a single center

Objectives

To investigate the clinical characteristics and prognosis of primary vaginal sarcoma.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of patients with primary vaginal sarcoma treated at our center from 2000 to 2020 was conducted.

Results

Fifteen patients were identified, among which 9 (60.0 %) patients had leiomyosarcoma, 2 (13.3 %) patients had Ewing's sarcoma, 2 (13.3 %) patients had rhabdomyosarcoma, 1 (6.7 %) patient had undifferentiated sarcoma, and 1 (6.7 %) patient had malignant peripheral schwannoma. Nine patients presented with vaginal mass that was the most common primary symptoms. Eleven patients received their primary surgery, and 7 of them received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation therapy. The remaining 4 patients received initial chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy because of advanced stage. The distribution by stage was as follows: stage I in 10 patients, stage II in 1 patient, stage III in 2 patients and stage IV in 2 patients. The median follow-up was 43.7 months (10.1-137.5 months). Thirteen patients (86.7 %) had disease extent during follow-up, and among them, 11 patients (11/13, 84.6 %) developed local relapse or adjacent organ metastases, 1 patient (1/13, 7.7 %) developed liver metastases, and the remaining 1 patient (1/13, 7.7 %) developed lung metastases and local relapse during follow-up. Ten (10/13, 76.9 %) patients relapsed within 2 years after diagnosis. Eight patients (8/11, 72.7 %) with local recurrence or adjacent organ metastases received a secondary surgery treatment, and only 2 of them relapsed again. Two-year overall survival (OS) and 5-year OS were 80.0 % and 66.7 %, respectively. Patients with leiomyosarcoma had a tendency toward a better 5-year OS than those with other sarcomas (74.1 % vs 66.7 %, P = 0.307).

Conclusions

Primary vaginal sarcomas are aggressive neoplasms with different presenting characteristics. Surgery is the main treatment for primary vaginal sarcoma and for local relapse vaginal sarcoma.

A modern-day experience with Brunschwig's operation: Outcomes associated with pelvic exenteration

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate postoperative and oncologic outcomes associated with pelvic exenteration for non-ovarian gynecologic malignancies.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of patients who underwent pelvic exenteration for non-ovarian gynecologic malignancies at our institution from 1/1/2010-12/31/2019. Palliative exenteration cases were excluded from survival analysis. Postoperative complications were early (≤30 days) or late (31-180 days). Complications were graded using a validated institutional scale. Major complications were considered grade ≥ 3. Categorical variables were compared using the chi-square test, and the Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis.

RESULTS

Of 100 patients identified, 89 underwent pelvic exenteration for recurrent disease, 5 for palliation, 5 for primary disease, and 1 for persistent disease. Thirty percent had cervical, 27% vulvar, 24% uterine, and 19% vaginal cancer. Sixty-two percent underwent total, 30% anterior, and 8% posterior exenteration. No deaths occurred intraoperatively or within 30 days of surgery. Six patients died after 30 days. Ninety-seven experienced a perioperative complication-49 early, 1 late, and 47 both. Fifty experienced a major complication-22 (44%) early, 19 (38%) late, and 9 (18%) both. No variables were statistically associated with complication development. The 3-year progression-free survival rate was 61.0%; the 3-year overall survival rate was 61.6%. Of 58 surviving patients, 16 (28%) and 4 (7%) were alive after 5 and 10 years, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The overall complication rate for pelvic exenteration remains high. No variables demonstrated association with complication development as the rate was nearly 100%. The low rate of perioperative mortality is likely due to improved perioperative care.

Significance of p53 and presence of differentiated vulvar intra-epithelial neoplasia (dVIN) at resection margin in early stage human papillomavirus-independent vulvar squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Vulvar squamous cell carcinoma and in situ lesions can be stratified by human papillomavirus (HPV) and TP53 status into prognostic risk groups using p16 and p53 immunohistochemistry. We assessed the significance of vulvar squamous cell carcinoma resection margin positivity for either differentiated vulvar intra-epithelial neoplasia (dVIN) or abnormal p53 immunohistochemistry, and other pathologic variables, in a cohort of patients with HPV-independent (HPV-I) p53 abnormal (p53abn) vulvar squamous cell carcinomas.

METHODS

Patients with stage I-II HPV-I p53abn vulvar squamous cell carcinoma with negative invasive margins who did not receive adjuvant radiation from a single institution were included. Tumors underwent margin reassessment using p53 immunohistochemistry. Cases were segregated into (1) morphologic dVIN at margin; or (2) abnormal p53 immunohistochemistry staining at margin without morphologic dVIN (p53abn immunohistochemistry); or (3) margins negative by morphology and p53 immunohistochemistry. Clinicopathologic/outcome data were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 51 patients were evaluated: (1) 12 with dVIN on margin; (2) 12 with p53abn immunohistochemistry on margin without morphologic dVIN; and (3) 27 with margins negative for morphologic dVIN and p53abn immunohistochemistry. The recurrence rate for patients with dVIN or p53abn immunohistochemistry on the margin was equally high at 75% each, compared with 33% with margins negative for morphologic dVIN and p53abn immunohistochemistry (p=0.009). On multivariate analysis, positive in situ margins maintained an association with disease recurrence (p=0.03) whereas invasive margin distance (radial and deep), lymphovascular invasion, and tumor size did not.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with stage I-II HPV-I vulvar squamous cell carcinoma with margins positive for either dVIN or p53abn immunohistochemistry without morphologic dVIN showed increased disease recurrence, regardless of invasive margin distance. These findings show that p53 immunohistochemistry is a useful adjunct for evaluating margin status in HPV-I vulvar squamous cell carcinoma and may support repeat excision for positive in situ margins (dVIN or p53abn immunohistochemistry).

Electrochemotherapy as an Alternative Treatment Option to Pelvic Exenteration for Recurrent Vulvar Cancer of the Perineum Region

Objective: Pelvic exenteration in women with recurrent vulvar carcinoma is associated with high morbidity and mortality and substantial treatment costs. Because pelvic exenteration severely affects the quality of life and can lead to significant complications, other treatment modalities, such as electrochemotherapy, have been proposed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and suitability of electrochemotherapy in the treatment of recurrent vulvar cancer. We aimed to analyze the treatment options, treatment outcomes, and complications in patients with recurrent vulvar cancer of the perineum. Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients who had undergone pelvic exenteration for vulvar cancer at the Institute of Oncology Ljubljana over a 16-year period was performed. As an experimental, less mutilating treatment, electrochemotherapy was performed on one patient with recurrent vulvar cancer involving the perineum. Comparative data analysis was performed between the group with pelvic exenteration and the patient with electrochemotherapy, comparing hospital stay, disease recurrence after treatment, survival after treatment in months, and quality of life after treatment. Results: We observed recurrence of disease in 2 patients with initial FIGO stage IIIC disease 3 months and 32 months after pelvic exenteration, and they died of the disease 15 and 38 months after pelvic exenteration. Two patients with FIGO stage IB were alive at 74 and 88 months after pelvic exenteration. One patient with initial FIGO stage IIIC was alive 12 months after treatment with electrochemotherapy with no visible signs of disease progression in the vulvar region, and the lesions had a complete response. The patient treated with electrochemotherapy was hospitalized for 4 days compared with the patients with pelvic exenteration, in whom the average hospital stay was 19.75 (± 1.68) days. Conclusion: Our experience has shown that electrochemotherapy might be a less radical alternative to pelvic exenteration, especially for patients with initially higher FIGO stages.