1
|
Bergin RJ, O'Sullivan D, Dixon-Suen S, Emery JD, English DR, Milne RL, White VM. Time to Diagnosis and Treatment for Ovarian Cancer and Associations with Outcomes: A Systematic Review. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2024; 33:1185-1197. [PMID: 38976232 DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2023.1160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Ovarian cancer is commonly diagnosed symptomatically at an advanced stage. Better survival for early disease suggests improving diagnostic pathways may increase survival. This study examines literature assessing diagnostic intervals and their association with clinical and psychological outcomes. Methods: Medline, EMBASE, and EmCare databases were searched for studies including quantitative measures of at least one interval, published between January 1, 2000 and August 9, 2022. Interval measures and associations (interval, outcomes, analytic strategy) were synthesized. Risk of bias of association studies was assessed using the Aarhus Checklist and ROBINS-E tool. Results: In total, 65 papers (20 association studies) were included and 26 unique intervals were identified. Interval estimates varied widely and were impacted by summary statistic used (mean or median) and group focused on. Of Aarhus-defined intervals, patient (symptom to presentation, n = 23; range [median]: 7-168 days) and diagnostic (presentation to diagnosis, n = 22; range [median]: 7-270 days) were most common. Nineteen association studies examined survival or stage outcomes with most, including five low risk-of-bias studies, finding no association. Conclusions: Studies reporting intervals for ovarian cancer diagnosis are limited by inconsistent definitions and reporting. Greater utilization of the Aarhus statement to define intervals and appropriate analytic methods is needed to strengthen findings from future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca J Bergin
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Deirdre O'Sullivan
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Suzanne Dixon-Suen
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia
- School of Exercise & Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia
| | - Jon D Emery
- Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Dallas R English
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia
| | - Roger L Milne
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | - Victoria M White
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia
- Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Di Nisio V, Daponte N, Messini C, Anifandis G, Antonouli S. Oncofertility and Fertility Preservation for Women with Gynecological Malignancies: Where Do We Stand Today? Biomolecules 2024; 14:943. [PMID: 39199331 PMCID: PMC11353009 DOI: 10.3390/biom14080943] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2024] [Revised: 07/19/2024] [Accepted: 08/01/2024] [Indexed: 09/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Oncofertility is a growing medical and research field that includes two main areas: oncology and reproductive medicine. Nowadays, the percentage of patients surviving cancer has exponentially increased, leading to the need for intervention for fertility preservation in both men and women. Specifically, gynecological malignancies in women pose an additional layer of complexity due to the reproductive organs being affected. In the present review, we report fertility preservation options with a cancer- and stage-specific focus. We explore the drawbacks and the necessity for planning fertility preservation applications during emergency statuses (i.e., the COVID-19 pandemic) and comment on the importance of repro-counseling for multifaceted patients during their oncological and reproductive journey.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentina Di Nisio
- Department of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, 14186 Stockholm, Sweden;
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, 14186 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Nikoletta Daponte
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, 41500 Larisa, Greece; (N.D.); (C.M.); (G.A.)
| | - Christina Messini
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, 41500 Larisa, Greece; (N.D.); (C.M.); (G.A.)
| | - George Anifandis
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, 41500 Larisa, Greece; (N.D.); (C.M.); (G.A.)
| | - Sevastiani Antonouli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, 41500 Larisa, Greece; (N.D.); (C.M.); (G.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yasin N, Yu M, Jones K, Woolfield A, Hughes I, Nascimento M, Green H. The impact of the COVID-19 public health response on service demand and patient perceptions in a tertiary Australian gynaecology oncology unit. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2024. [PMID: 39073108 DOI: 10.1111/ajo.13867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 07/09/2024] [Indexed: 07/30/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The public health response (PHR) to the COVID-19 pandemic significantly disrupted healthcare services worldwide. Our hospital, a major tertiary centre, is a unique two-state service across Queensland and New South Wales (NSW). OBJECTIVE The primary objective is to describe changes in service demand and delivery in our hospital resulting from the COVID-19 PHR. The secondary objective is to investigate patient perceptions of this impact. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed a retrospective interrupted time series analysis and a population-based survey to examine patient perceptions of the impact of the COVID-19 PHR. The study periods were demarcated by the initiation of the COVID-19 PHR on 1 March 2020 with the 'pre' and 'during' COVID-19 periods defined as the 12 months before and after this date respectively. RESULTS More patients were seen during the COVID-19 PHR period. The number or stage of cancer diagnoses was not different (P > 0.05). There was evidence (P = 0.03) of an increase in overall occasions of service and fewer failed attendances (P = 0.005). Fewer surgeries were performed on NSW patients (P = 0.005). The survey response rate was 19.3% (n = 185) with 48% stating that COVID-19 had negatively affected their emotional wellbeing. More participants from NSW than Queensland identified border closures as the most significant impact of the COVID-19 PHR. DISCUSSION The COVID-19 PHR resulted in an unexpected increase in unit service demand and delivery. The necessary implementation of telephone appointments, while less preferred by patients, sustained service requirements. Cross-border tertiary healthcare services should consider the significant impact of border restrictions on patient wellbeing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nooraishah Yasin
- Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Southport, Queensland, Australia
| | - Michael Yu
- Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Southport, Queensland, Australia
| | - Kristen Jones
- Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Southport, Queensland, Australia
| | - Anne Woolfield
- Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Southport, Queensland, Australia
- University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Ian Hughes
- Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Southport, Queensland, Australia
| | - Marcelo Nascimento
- Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Southport, Queensland, Australia
| | - Helen Green
- Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Southport, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
van Vuren RMG, Janssen YF, Hogenbirk RNM, de Graaff MR, van den Hoek R, Kruijff S, Heineman DJ, van der Plas WY, Wouters MWJM. The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Time to Treatment in Surgical Oncology: A National Registry Study in The Netherlands. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1738. [PMID: 38730690 PMCID: PMC11083561 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16091738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2024] [Revised: 04/24/2024] [Accepted: 04/27/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
To avoid delay in oncological treatment, a 6-weeks norm for time to treatment has been agreed on in The Netherlands. However, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on health systems resulted in reduced capacity for regular surgical care. In this study, we investigated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on time to treatment in surgical oncology in The Netherlands. METHODS A population-based analysis of data derived from five surgical audits, including patients who underwent surgery for lung cancer, colorectal cancer, upper gastro-intestinal, and hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) malignancies, was performed. The COVID-19 cohort of 2020 was compared to the historic cohorts of 2018 and 2019. Primary endpoints were time to treatment initiation and the proportion of patients whose treatment started within 6 weeks. The secondary objective was to evaluate the differences in characteristics and tumour stage distribution between patients treated before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS A total of 14,567 surgical cancer patients were included in this study, of these 3292 treatments were started during the COVID-19 pandemic. The median time to treatment decreased during the pandemic (26 vs. 27 days, p < 0.001) and the proportion of patients whose treatment started within 6 weeks increased (76% vs. 73%, p < 0.001). In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, adjusting for patient characteristics, no significant difference in post-operative outcomes between patients who started treatment before or after 6 weeks was found. Overall, the number of procedures performed per week decreased by 8.1% during the pandemic. This reduction was most profound for patients with stage I lung carcinoma and colorectal carcinoma. There were fewer patients with pulmonary comorbidities in the pandemic cohort (11% vs. 13%, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS Despite pressure on the capacity of the healthcare system during the COVID-19 pandemic, a larger proportion of surgical oncological patients started treatment within six weeks, possibly due to prioritisation of cancer care and reductions in elective procedures. However, during the pandemic, a decrease in the number of surgical oncological procedures performed in The Netherlands was observed, especially for patients with stage I disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roos M. G. van Vuren
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands; (R.M.G.v.V.); (R.N.M.H.); (M.R.d.G.); (R.v.d.H.); (S.K.)
| | - Yester F. Janssen
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands;
- TRACER Europe B.V., Aarhusweg 2-1, 9723 JJ Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Rianne N. M. Hogenbirk
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands; (R.M.G.v.V.); (R.N.M.H.); (M.R.d.G.); (R.v.d.H.); (S.K.)
| | - Michelle R. de Graaff
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands; (R.M.G.v.V.); (R.N.M.H.); (M.R.d.G.); (R.v.d.H.); (S.K.)
- Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Scientific Bureau, 2333 AA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Rinske van den Hoek
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands; (R.M.G.v.V.); (R.N.M.H.); (M.R.d.G.); (R.v.d.H.); (S.K.)
| | - Schelto Kruijff
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands; (R.M.G.v.V.); (R.N.M.H.); (M.R.d.G.); (R.v.d.H.); (S.K.)
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Centre Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - David J. Heineman
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (D.J.H.); (W.Y.v.d.P.)
| | - Willemijn Y. van der Plas
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (D.J.H.); (W.Y.v.d.P.)
| | - Michel W. J. M. Wouters
- Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Scientific Bureau, 2333 AA Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Centre, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mukherjee A, Shammas N, Xu L, Cannavale KL, Gilfillan AD, Szamreta EA, Monberg M, Hodeib M, Chao CR. Impact of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 pandemic on neoadjuvant chemotherapy use in patients diagnosed with epithelial type ovarian cancer. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1290719. [PMID: 38601762 PMCID: PMC11005450 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1290719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic posed critical challenges in providing care to ovarian cancer (OC) patients, including delays in OC diagnosis and treatment initiation. To accommodate for delays in OC surgery, the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) recommended preferential use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy during the pandemic. The purpose of this study was to assess the association of the COVID-19 pandemic with neoadjuvant chemotherapy use in patients diagnosed with OC. Methods This retrospective cohort study included patients diagnosed with stage II-IV ovarian cancer of epithelial subtype between 01/01/2017-06/30/2021 at Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC), a large integrated healthcare system in the United States. Ovarian cancer patients diagnosed between 2017-2020 were identified from KPSC's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-affiliated cancer registry. Patients diagnosed in 2021 were identified from the electronic medical records (EMR) using ICD-10 diagnosis codes, followed by medical chart review to validate diagnosis and extract information on histology and stage at diagnosis. March 4, 2020 was used as the cut-off to define pre-pandemic and pandemic periods. Patients diagnosed with COVID-19 between OC diagnosis and treatment completion were excluded. Data on neoadjuvant chemotherapy use were extracted from the cancer registry and EMR, supplemented by chart review. Modified Poisson regression was used to evaluate the association of the pandemic with neoadjuvant chemotherapy use. Results Of 566 OC patients, 160 (28.3%) were diagnosed in the pandemic period. Patients diagnosed in the pandemic period were slightly younger (mean age 62.7 vs 64.9 years, p=0.07) and had a higher burden of Charlson comorbidities (p=0.05) than patients diagnosed in pre-pandemic period. No differences in time to treatment initiation were observed by pandemic periods. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy use was documented in 58.7% patients during the pandemic period compared to 47.3% in pre-pandemic period (p=0.01). After adjusting for covariates, patients diagnosed in the pandemic period were 29% more likely to receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy than patients diagnosed in pre-pandemic period [RR(95%CI): 1.29(1.12-1.49)]. Discussions Ovarian cancer patients diagnosed in the COVID-19 pandemic were more likely to receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy than patients diagnosed before the pandemic. Future research on patient outcomes and trends in the post-pandemic period are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amrita Mukherjee
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, United States
| | - Natalie Shammas
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Adventist Health White Memorial Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Lanfang Xu
- Data Reporting and Analytics, MedHealth Statistical Consulting Inc., Solon, OH, United States
| | - Kimberly L. Cannavale
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, United States
| | - Alec D. Gilfillan
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, United States
| | - Elizabeth A. Szamreta
- Center for Observational and Real-World Evidence (CORE), Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, United States
| | - Matthew Monberg
- Center for Observational and Real-World Evidence (CORE), Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, United States
| | - Melissa Hodeib
- Gynecology Oncology, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Riverside, CA, United States
| | - Chun R. Chao
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Swift BE, Mazuryk J, Yermakhanova O, Green B, Ferguson SR, Kupets R. Access to Surgery for Endometrial Cancer Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Ontario, Canada: A Population-Based Study. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2024; 46:102226. [PMID: 37742834 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2023.102226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2023] [Revised: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/01/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on endometrial cancer stage and surgical treatment in Ontario, Canada. METHODS This descriptive study identified cases from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2021 from endometrial cancer hysterectomy specimens in the Ontario Health-Cancer Care Ontario, ePath system. Endometrial biopsy records from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2021 were matched to surgical specimens by provincial health card number. Time to surgery and surgical stage were compared before (2017-2019) and during (2020-2021) the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS There were 10 446 women treated with hysterectomy for endometrial cancer in Ontario from 2017-2021. In April and May 2020, corresponding with the provincial state of emergency, there was a 56% relative reduction in endometrial biopsies. Despite this 2-month reduction in endometrial biopsy volume, there was no change in surgical volume for endometrial cancer treatment. The median time from endometrial biopsy to surgery was 56 days (IQR 40, 80) during the pandemic (2020-2021) compared to 58 days (IQR 43, 82) prior to the pandemic (2017-2019) (P < 0.001). There was no upstaging of endometrial cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSIONS The Ontario healthcare system continued to prioritize service delivery to endometrial cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic, despite the increase in virtual care and decrease in operating room time. There were no significant surgical delays or upstaging of endometrial cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brenna E Swift
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON; Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON
| | | | | | - Bo Green
- Ontario Health-Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON
| | - Sarah R Ferguson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON; Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, University Health Network, Toronto, ON
| | - Rachel Kupets
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON; Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wickenheisser NE, Dillon M, Broadwater G, Zacherl K, Bixel K, Levine M, Newton M, Thel H, Tucker K, Gehrig P, Khetan VU, Brunette-Masi LL, Matsuo K, Khouri OR, Duhon A, Gowthaman D, Cowan M, Mojdehbakhsh R, Rose S, Olawaiye A, Davidson BA, Moss HA, Havrilesky LJ. Radical hysterectomy case volume and cervical cancer treatment in the era of COVID-19: A multi-site analysis of National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 179:70-78. [PMID: 37944328 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2023] [Revised: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare radical hysterectomy case volume, cancer stage, and biopsy-to-treatment time of invasive cervical cancer diagnosed before and after onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS In a multi-institution retrospective cohort study conducted at 6 large, geographically diverse National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers, patients treated for newly diagnosed invasive cervical cancer were classified into 2 temporal cohorts based on date of first gynecologic oncology encounter: (1) Pre-Pandemic: 3/1/2018-2/28/2020; (2) Pandemic & Recovery: 4/1/2020-12/31/2021. The primary outcome was total monthly radical hysterectomy case volume. Secondary outcomes were stage at diagnosis and diagnosis-to-treatment time. Statistical analyses used chi-squared and two sample t-tests. RESULTS Between 3/1/2018-12/31/2021, 561 patients were diagnosed with cervical cancer. The Pre-Pandemic and Pandemic & Recovery cohorts had similar age, race, ethnicity, smoking status, and Body Mass Index (BMI). During Pandemic & Recovery, the mean monthly radical hysterectomy case volume decreased from 7[SD 2.8] to 5[SD 2.0] (p = 0.001), the proportion of patients diagnosed with Stage I disease dropped from 278/561 (49.5%) to 155/381 (40.7%), and diagnosis of stage II-IV disease increased from 281/561 (50.1%) to 224/381 (58.8%). Primary surgical management was less frequent (38.3% Pandemic & Recovery versus 46.7% Pre-Pandemic, p = 0.013) and fewer surgically-treated patients received surgery within 6 weeks of diagnosis (27.4% versus 38.9%; p = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS Lower radical hysterectomy case volume, a shift to higher cervical cancer stage, and delay in surgical therapy were observed across the United States following the COVID-19 outbreak. Decreased surgical volume may result from lower detection of early-stage disease or other factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie E Wickenheisser
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Mairead Dillon
- Biostatistics Shared Resources, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Gloria Broadwater
- Biostatistics Shared Resources, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Kathleen Zacherl
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Kristin Bixel
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Monica Levine
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States of America
| | - Meredith Newton
- Divison of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America
| | - Hannah Thel
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America
| | - Katherine Tucker
- Divison of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America
| | - Paola Gehrig
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, United States of America
| | - Varun U Khetan
- Divison of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Laurie L Brunette-Masi
- Divison of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Koji Matsuo
- Divison of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Olivia R Khouri
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, United States of America
| | - Ashley Duhon
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, United States of America
| | - Divya Gowthaman
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, United States of America
| | - Matthew Cowan
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, United States of America
| | - Rachel Mojdehbakhsh
- Divison of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Wisconsin Health, Madison, WI, United States of America
| | - Stephen Rose
- Divison of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Wisconsin Health, Madison, WI, United States of America
| | - Alexander Olawaiye
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
| | - Brittany A Davidson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Haley A Moss
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Laura J Havrilesky
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Plotti F, Silvagni A, Montera R, De Cicco Nardone C, Luvero D, Ficarola F, Cundari GB, Branda F, Angioli R, Terranova C. Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on the Diagnostic and Therapeutic Management of Endometrial Cancer: A Monocentric Retrospective Comparative Study. J Clin Med 2023; 12:7016. [PMID: 38002630 PMCID: PMC10671930 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12227016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2023] [Revised: 11/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Endometrial cancer represents an ideal target to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 being the most frequent gynecological malignancy in Italy, generally detected at early stages and correlated with favorable oncological outcomes. The present comparative retrospective study carried out at Campus Bio-medico University Foundation in Rome aims to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the presentation, diagnosis and treatment of EC. All women with a histological diagnosis of non-endometrioid and endometrioid endometrial cancer between 1 March 2018 and 31 October 2022 were included. The number of cases was higher in period 2 (95 vs. 64 cases). Time to diagnosis did not show statistically significant differences but in period 2, 92.06% of the diagnoses were made following abnormal uterine bleeding, while in period 1, only 67.02% were. The waiting time for the intervention was significantly shorter in period 2. Definitive histology, FIGO staging, surgical technique and adjuvant therapy did not show significant differences between the two periods. The study demonstrates that the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic did not have a direct effect on the diagnostic delay, tumor staging and type of therapy but rather on the presentation pattern of endometrial cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Plotti
- Unit of Gynecology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Adele Silvagni
- Unit of Gynecology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Montera
- Unit of Gynecology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Carlo De Cicco Nardone
- Unit of Gynecology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Daniela Luvero
- Unit of Gynecology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Fernando Ficarola
- Unit of Gynecology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Gianna Barbara Cundari
- Unit of Gynecology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Branda
- Unit of Medical Statistics and Molecular Epidemiology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Angioli
- Unit of Gynecology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Corrado Terranova
- Unit of Gynecology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Oymans EJ, de Kroon CD, Bart J, Nijman HW, van der Aa MA. Incidence of gynaecological cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic: A population-based study in the Netherlands. Cancer Epidemiol 2023; 85:102405. [PMID: 37356263 PMCID: PMC10281225 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2023.102405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2023] [Revised: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 06/18/2023] [Indexed: 06/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To study the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and consequent lockdown on the number of diagnoses of gynaecological malignancies in the Netherlands. METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study using data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR) on women of 18 years and older diagnosed with invasive endometrial, ovarian, cervical or vulvar cancer in the period 2017-2021. Analyses were stratified for age, socioeconomical status (SES) and region. RESULTS The incidence rate of gynaecological cancer was 67/100.000 (n = 4832) before (2017-2019) and 68/100.000 (n = 4833) during (2020) the COVID-19 pandemic. Comparing the number of diagnoses of the two periods for the four types of cancer separately showed no significant difference. During the first wave of COVID-19 (March-June 2020), a clear decrease in number of gynaecological cancer diagnoses was visible (20-34 %). Subsequently, large increases in number of diagnoses were visible (11-29 %). No significant differences in incidence were found between different age groups, SES and regions. In 2021 an increase of 5.9 % in number of diagnoses was seen. CONCLUSION In the Netherlands, a clear drop in number of diagnoses was visible for all four types of gynaecological cancers during the first wave, with a subsequent increase in number of diagnoses in the second part of 2020 and in 2021. No differences between SES groups were found. This illustrates good organisation of and access to health care in the Netherlands.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eline J Oymans
- Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Godebaldkwartier 419, 3511 DT Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | - Cor D de Kroon
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Joost Bart
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Pathology, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Hans W Nijman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Maaike A van der Aa
- Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Godebaldkwartier 419, 3511 DT Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Garofil ND, Bratucu MN, Zurzu M, Paic V, Tigora A, Prunoiu V, Rogobete A, Balan A, Vladescu C, Strambu VDE, Radu PA. Groin Hernia Repair during the COVID-19 Pandemic-A Romanian Nationwide Analysis. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2023; 59:medicina59050970. [PMID: 37241202 DOI: 10.3390/medicina59050970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Revised: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Groin hernia repair surgery (GHRS) is among the most common elective interventions. The aim of this three-year nationwide study on GHRS is to provide a thorough analysis of the impact that the COVID-19 pandemic had on the Romanian Health System in regard to elective procedures. Materials and Methods: 46,795 groin hernia cases obtained between 2019 and 2021 from the DRG database using ICD-10 diagnostic codes. The data were collected from all 261 GHRS performing hospitals nationwide, including 227 public hospitals (PbH) and 34 private hospitals (PvH). The 42 variables taken into account were processed using Microsoft Excel 2021, applying Chi square, F-Test Two-Sample for variances, and Two Sample t-Test. The significance threshold considered was p < 0.001. Results: Of the grand total of cases, 96.2% were inguinal hernias, 86.8% were performed on men, 15.2% were laparoscopic procedures, and 6.88% were in PvH. Overall, due to the pandemic, the total number of GHRS decreased with 44.45% in 2020 and with 29.72% in 2021 compared to pre-pandemic year 2019. April 2020 shows the steepest decrease in GHRS (91 procedures nationwide). In the private sector, there was an opposite trend with increases in the number of cases by 12.21% and a 70.22% in both pandemic years. The mean admission period (MAP) for all procedures was 5.5 days. There was a significant difference between PbH and PvH (5.75 vs. 2.8 days, p < 0.0001). During the pandemic, the MAP in PbH decreased (6.02 in 2019, 5.82 in 2020 and 5.3 in 2021), remaining stable for PvH (2.9 days in 2019, 2.85 days in 2020 and 2.74 days in 2021). Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic significantly reduced the overall number of GHRS performed in Romania in 2020 and 2021, compared to 2019. However, the private sector thrived with an actual increase in the number of cases. There was a significant lower MAP in the PvH compared to PbH throughout the three-year period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolae Dragos Garofil
- Faculty of Medicine, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Mircea Nicolae Bratucu
- Faculty of Medicine, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Mihai Zurzu
- Faculty of Medicine, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Vlad Paic
- Faculty of Medicine, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Anca Tigora
- Faculty of Medicine, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Virgiliu Prunoiu
- Faculty of Medicine, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Alexandru Rogobete
- Faculty of Medicine, "Victor Babeș" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timișoara, Romania
| | - Ana Balan
- Faculty of Medicine, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Cristian Vladescu
- National Institute of Health Services Management, 030167 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Victor Dan Eugen Strambu
- Faculty of Medicine, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Petru Adrian Radu
- Faculty of Medicine, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
El-Tawab SS, Fox J, Trent S, Kehoe S. Cervical cancer during the covid pandemic: Are patients presenting with more advanced or larger tumours? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2023; 283:95-99. [PMID: 36822124 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2022] [Revised: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/10/2023] [Indexed: 02/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Concerns were raised by clinicians at the Oxford Gynaecological Cancer MDT that there was an increasing number of women presenting with large cervical tumours requiring chemo-radiotherapy, possibly due to delays associated with the COVID pandemic. This audit was undertaken to assess whether this was a real event. STUDY DESIGN This retrospective cohort study collated the data from the central pathology service covering Oxfordshire, in the Oxford Gynaecological cancer centre. The control population consisted of patients treated during the 2 years pre-pandemic (1st Jan 2018-31 Dec 2019) and the study group the 2-year pandemic period (1st Jan 2020 until 31st December 2021). A total of 153 patients (74 control and 79 study) were diagnosed of cervical cancer during the study period. Variables included in the analysis were age, pathway of referral and diagnosis (cytology or clinical), FIGO stage, tumour histology, tumour size (using maximum diameter on MRI) and treatment. Student's t-test was used for continuous and discrete variables, respectively. The X2 test was used for the statistical analysis of proportions. RESULTS There was no statistically significant differences was noted in the referral pathways during both periods. Statistically significant stage migration from FIGO stage II to III was detected (p < 0.05), though no statistically significant change in tumour size. However, the pattern of tumour volume on case-to-case comparison elicited more cases with larger volumes during the pandemic periods. CONCLUSIONS Referral pathways of diagnosed cancer cervix was not affected during the pandemic in Oxfordshire. Therapeutic treatment numbers were unchanged - but some changes in tumour volume were likely the reason for the impression more such cases. Whether the stage shift noted here is representative of the wider population requires further studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sally S El-Tawab
- Oxford Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Headington, Oxford OX3 7DL, United Kingdom; Elshatby Maternity University Hospital, Gynaecology Oncology Center, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
| | - Julia Fox
- Consultant Biomedical Scientist, Cellular Pathology Department, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DU, United Kingdom.
| | - Sally Trent
- Clinical Oncology Department, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Headington, Oxford OX3 7DL, United Kingdom.
| | - Sean Kehoe
- Oxford Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Headington, Oxford OX3 7DL, United Kingdom; Nuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, The Women's Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9 DU, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Trends in Hysterectomy Rates Associated With the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic. Obstet Gynecol 2023; 141:592-601. [PMID: 36649321 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000005087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2022] [Accepted: 12/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare nationwide trends in the rate of inpatient and outpatient hysterectomy between 2019 and 2020 during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. METHODS Using weighted data from the National Inpatient Sample and the National Ambulatory Surgery Sample, we examined the number of hysterectomies performed by month from 2019 through 2020. Monthly trends were compared between years overall, stratified by the route of surgery (abdominal, laparoscopic, and vaginal) and by indication for surgery (benign, preinvasive, cancer). Trends analyses were conducted using Joinpoint regression and reported as average monthly percentage change (AMPC). Differences in demographic characteristics between the years were compared using χ 2 tests. RESULTS From January 2019 through December 2020, after weighting, 1,029,792 hysterectomies were performed, including 548,802 (53.2%) in 2019 and 480,990 (46.7%) in 2020. Starting in January 2020, monthly cases declined significantly, from 40,240 to a nadir of 10,566 hysterectomies in April 2020 (AMPC -29.2%, 95% CI -39.8% to -16.8%) ( P <.001). The subsequent months saw a significant increase in cases, from the nadir in April 2020 to 40,023 cases in July 2020 (AMPC 39.4%, 95% CI 18.6-63.9%) ( P =.001), which then stabilized to the end of the year (AMPC -1.3%, 95% CI -4.8% to 2.4%) ( P =.46). In March 2020 there was a 24.0% decrease, in April 2020 a 74.2% decrease, and in May 2020 a 35.1% decrease compared with the respective months in 2019. The rates of vaginal hysterectomy declined more than the rates of other routes of surgery, and procedures performed for benign and preinvasive disease decreased more than those for cancer. CONCLUSION The rate of hysterectomy in the United States decreased in 2020 compared with 2019, with the greatest decrease from March to May of 2020, corresponding with the initial wave of COVID-19.
Collapse
|
13
|
Wiegers HMG, Schaafsma M, Guman NAM, Zelisse HS, Mulder FI, Middeldorp S, van Es N, Mom CH. Risk of venous thromboembolism and bleeding after major surgery for ovarian cancer: standard in-hospital versus extended duration of thromboprophylaxis. JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS : JTH 2023; 21:294-302. [PMID: 36700503 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtha.2022.11.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2022] [Revised: 10/18/2022] [Accepted: 11/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a frequent complication in patients with ovarian cancer after major surgery. Based on limited data, international guidelines recommend extended thromboprophylaxis for up to 28 days. OBJECTIVES To assess the incidence of VTE and bleeding within 30 days following major surgery in patients with ovarian cancer and to evaluate the association between VTE and thromboprophylaxis duration. METHODS This was a single-center, retrospective, "before-after" cohort study in patients with ovarian cancer undergoing major surgery. Before July 2019, the local protocol mandated a standard course of thromboprophylaxis during hospital stay only. From July 2019 onward, patients received extended thromboprophylaxis for 28 days. The cumulative incidences of VTE and major bleeding within 30 days after surgery were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Cox regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association between thromboprophylaxis duration and VTE incidence. RESULTS Between January 2018 and December 2020, 250 women were included, of which 118 (47.2%) received extended and 132 (52.8%) standard thromboprophylaxis. During follow-up, 12 patients developed VTE (cumulative incidence, 4.8%; 95% CI, 2.1-7.4) and 2 major bleeding (cumulative incidence 0.8%; 95% CI, 0.0-1.9). Compared with standard thromboprophylaxis, VTE incidence was numerically lower with extended duration of thromboprophylaxis (5/118 [4.2%] vs 7/132 [5.3%]) but not significantly different (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.25-2.52). The risk of major bleeding was similar in both groups (1/118 [0.8%] vs 1/132 [0.8%]; hazard ratio, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.07-17.89). CONCLUSIONS The cumulative VTE incidence in patients with ovarian cancer following major surgery was considerable. Extended thromboprophylaxis was safe and associated with a numerically lower risk of VTE but not significantly different.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanke M G Wiegers
- Amsterdam UMC - location University of Amsterdam, Vascular Medicine, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Pulmonary Hypertension & Thrombosis, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Mirte Schaafsma
- Antoni van Leeuwenhoek/Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Centre of Gynaecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Noori A M Guman
- Amsterdam UMC - location University of Amsterdam, Vascular Medicine, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Pulmonary Hypertension & Thrombosis, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hein S Zelisse
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Frits I Mulder
- Amsterdam UMC - location University of Amsterdam, Vascular Medicine, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Pulmonary Hypertension & Thrombosis, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Tergooi Medical Center, Hilversum, the Netherlands
| | - Saskia Middeldorp
- Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Nick van Es
- Amsterdam UMC - location University of Amsterdam, Vascular Medicine, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Pulmonary Hypertension & Thrombosis, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Constantijne H Mom
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Cata JP, Hu J, Feng L, Chung C, Woodman SE, Meyer LA. Association between COVID-19 and Postoperative Neurological Complications and Antipsychotic Medication Use after Cancer Surgery: A Retrospective Study. J Pers Med 2023; 13:jpm13020274. [PMID: 36836508 PMCID: PMC9959979 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13020274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2022] [Revised: 01/26/2023] [Accepted: 01/29/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Millions of Americans infected with the severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus-19 (COVID-19) need oncologic surgery. Patients with acute or resolved COVID-19 illness complain of neuropsychiatric symptoms. How surgery affects postoperative neuropsychiatric outcomes such as delirium is unknown. We hypothesize that patients with a history of COVID-19 could have an exaggerated risk of developing postoperative delirium after undergoing major elective oncologic surgery. METHODS We conducted a retrospective study to determine the association between COVID-19 status and antipsychotic drugs during postsurgical hospitalization as a surrogate of delirium. Secondary outcomes included 30 days of postoperative complications, length of stay, and mortality. Patients were grouped into pre-pandemic non-COVID-19 and COVID-19-positive groups. A 1:2 propensity score matching was used to minimize bias. A multivariable logistic regression model estimated the effects of important covariates on the use of postoperative psychotic medication. RESULTS A total of 6003 patients were included in the study. Pre- and post-propensity score matching demonstrated that a history of preoperative COVID-19 did not increase the risk of antipsychotic medications postoperatively. However, respiratory and overall 30-day complications were higher in COVID-19 individuals than in pre-pandemic non-COVID-19 patients. The multivariate analysis showed that the odds of using postoperative antipsychotic medication use for the patients who had COVID-19 compared to those who did not have the infection were not significantly different. CONCLUSION A preoperative diagnosis of COVID-19 did not increase the risk of postoperative antipsychotic medication use or neurological complications. More studies are needed to reproduce our results due to the increased concern of neurological events post-COVID-19 infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan P. Cata
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas—MD Anderson Cancer Centre, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Anesthesiology and Surgical Oncology Research Group, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Correspondence:
| | - Jian Hu
- Department of Cancer Biology, The University of Texas—MD Anderson Cancer Centre, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Lei Feng
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas—MD Anderson Cancer Centre, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Caroline Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas—MD Anderson Cancer Centre, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Data-Driven Determinants for COVID-19 Oncology Discovery Effort (D3CODE) Team, University of Texas—MD Anderson Cancer Centre, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Scott E. Woodman
- Data-Driven Determinants for COVID-19 Oncology Discovery Effort (D3CODE) Team, University of Texas—MD Anderson Cancer Centre, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas—MD Anderson Cancer Centre, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Larissa A. Meyer
- Department of Gynecology Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas—MD Anderson Cancer Centre, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Della Corte L, Cafasso V, Boccia D, Morra I, De Angelis C, De Placido S, Giampaolino P, Di Carlo C, Bifulco G. How SARS-CoV-2 Infection Impacts the Management of Patients with Vulvar Cancer: Experience in a Third-Level Hospital of Southern Italy. J Pers Med 2023; 13:jpm13020240. [PMID: 36836474 PMCID: PMC9967907 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13020240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2022] [Revised: 01/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Since February 2020, the spread of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Italy has induced the government to call for lockdown of any activity apart from primary needs, and changing the lives of each of us. All that has dramatically impacted the management of patients affected by cancer. Patients with vulvar cancer (VC) represent a particularly frail population because they are elderly and affected by multiple comorbidities. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical impact of the SARS-CoV-2 infection on VC patients in terms of delay or impossibility of carrying out the scheduled treatment. Methods: The medical records of patients affected by vulvar tumors, referred to "DAI Materno-Infantile" of AOU Federico II of Naples between February 2020 and January 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The presence of a positive reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in nasopharyngeal swab defined the positivity to SARS-CoV-2. Results: Twenty-four patients with VC were analyzed and scheduled for treatment. The median age was 70.7 years (range: 59-80). Seven (29.2%) patients were diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection: In three (42.8%) patients, the treatment was delayed with no apparent consequences, in four (57.2%), the treatment was delayed or changed due to cancer progression and, of these four, one died due to respiratory complications of COVID-19, and one died due to oncologic disease progression. Conclusion: COVID-19 caused, in most cases, significant delays in oncologic treatments and high mortality in our series of patients affected by VC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Della Corte
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, 84014 Naples, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Valeria Cafasso
- Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, 84014 Napoli, Italy
| | - Dominga Boccia
- Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, 84014 Napoli, Italy
| | - Ilaria Morra
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, 84014 Naples, Italy
| | - Carmine De Angelis
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, 84014 Naples, Italy
| | - Sabino De Placido
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, 84014 Naples, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Giampaolino
- Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, 84014 Napoli, Italy
| | - Costantino Di Carlo
- Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, 84014 Napoli, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Bifulco
- Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, 84014 Napoli, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Diagnosis and Management of Gynecological Cancer: A Single-Center Analysis. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2022; 58:medicina58121862. [PMID: 36557063 PMCID: PMC9787860 DOI: 10.3390/medicina58121862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Revised: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic impacted health systems worldwide, particularly cancer care. Because the actual implications of these changes on gynecological oncology healthcare are still unclear, we aim to evaluate the impact of this pandemic on the diagnosis and management of gynecological cancer. Materials and Methods: This is a single-center retrospective observational study, including patients diagnosed with gynecological malignancies between January 2019 and December 2021. Patients were included into three groups based on the timing of cancer diagnosis: pre-pandemic (2019), pandemic with high restrictions (2020) and pandemic recovery (2021). Results: Overall, 234 patients were diagnosed with gynecological cancer during the period of study. A decrease in the number of newly diagnosed cervical cancers and other rare tumors (leiomyosarcoma, invasive hydatidiform mole) was apparent in 2020. Some aggressive histological types of endometrial and ovarian cancer were more commonly diagnosed in the pandemic recovery group (p < 0.05), although no differences were demonstrated concerning tumor staging in all gynecological cancers. The median time between the first multidisciplinary team meeting and the treatment initiation was higher after the COVID-19 pandemic in endometrial cancer (23.0 vs. 34.0 vs. 36.0 days, p < 0.05). Patients with ovarian cancer were more frequently proposed for neoadjuvant therapy in 2020 compared to the other periods (33.3% vs. 55.0% vs. 10.0% p < 0.05). A significant reduction in the laparoscopic approach was observed during 2020 in endometrial cancer (32.1% vs. 14.3% vs. 36.4%, p < 0.05). No significant differences were registered regarding median hospitalization days or intra- and post-operative complications between these periods. Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on the diagnosis and management of most gynecological malignancies, namely, on time to first treatment, chosen oncological therapies and surgical approaches. These results suggest important clinical and healthcare implications that should be addressed in future prospective studies.
Collapse
|
17
|
Dimou A. Areas of Uncertainty in SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination for Cancer Patients. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:vaccines10122117. [PMID: 36560527 PMCID: PMC9784623 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10122117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Revised: 11/13/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, it was recognized that infection with SARS-CoV-2 is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer; therefore, preventive vaccination in cancer survivors is expected to be particularly impactful. Heterogeneity in how a neoplastic disease diagnosis and treatment interferes with humoral and cellular immunity, however, poses a number of challenges in vaccination strategies. Herein, the available literature on the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines among patients with cancer is critically appraised under the lens of anti-neoplastic treatment optimization. The objective of this review is to highlight areas of uncertainty, where more research could inform future SARS-CoV-2 immunization programs and maximize benefits in the high-risk cancer survivor population, and also minimize cancer treatment deviations from standard practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anastasios Dimou
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Gyne-Oncological Treatment-A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis of a German University Hospital with 30,525 Patients. Healthcare (Basel) 2022; 10:healthcare10122386. [PMID: 36553910 PMCID: PMC9777581 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10122386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2022] [Revised: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 11/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
The study pursues the objective of drawing a comparison between the data of gyne-oncology, gynecology, and obstetrics patient collectives of a German university hospital regarding the progression of patient number and corresponding treatment data during the five-year period of 2017-2021 to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on gyne-oncological treatment. Descriptive assessment is based on data extracted from the database of the hospital controlling system QlikView® for patients hospitalized at the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics of Marburg University Hospital. Gynecology and gyne-oncology experience a maintained decline in patient number (nGynecology: -6% 2019 to 2020, -5% 2019 to 2021; nGyne-Oncology: -6% 2019 to 2020, -2% 2019 to 2021) with varying effects on the specific gyne-oncological main diagnoses. Treatment parameters remain unchanged in relative assessment, but as gyne-oncology constitutes the dominating revenue contributor in gynecology (35.1% of patients, 52.9% of revenue, 2021), the extent of the decrease in total revenue (-18%, 2019 to 2020, -14%, 2019 to 2021) surpasses the decline in patient number. The study displays a negative impact on the gynecology care situation of a German university hospital for the entire pandemic, with an even greater extent on gyne-oncology. This development not only endangers the quality of medical service provision but collaterally pressurizes gynecology service providers.
Collapse
|