1
|
Zhu H, Xu S. SOX4 inhibits ferroptosis and promotes proliferation of endometrial cancer cells via the p53/SLC7A11 signaling. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2024. [PMID: 39318043 DOI: 10.1111/jog.16094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2024] [Accepted: 09/07/2024] [Indexed: 09/26/2024]
Abstract
AIM Sex-determining region Y-related high-mobility group box 4 (SOX4) has been reported to play a carcinogenic role in endometrial cancer (EC). However, the biological function and regulatory mechanisms of SOX4 in ferroptosis during the progression of EC are still unknown. METHODS The mRNA and protein levels were scrutinized by quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction and western blot, respectively. The cell viability and proliferative capability were determined by cell counting kit-8 assay and 5-ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine (EdU) assay. Transcriptional regulation of gene expression was investigated by dual-luciferase reporter assay and chromatin immunoprecipitation. Ferroptosis was evaluated by detection of reactive oxygen species, malondialdehyde, Fe2+, and ferroptosis-related proteins. The mice test was implemented to confirm the influence of SOX4 on EC tumor growth and ferroptosis in vivo. RESULTS We here discovered the elevation of SOX4 in EC tissues and cells. Functionally, SOX4 knockdown hampered proliferation and promoted ferroptosis of EC cells. Mechanistically, SOX4 bound to p53 promoter and inhibited its transcriptional activity in EC cells. In addition, p53 transcriptionally suppressed SLC7A11 expression in EC cells. Downregulation of p53 reverses the effect of SOX4 knockdown on proliferation and ferroptosis of EC cells. Finally, in vivo experiments demonstrated that SOX4 depletion hindered tumor growth and triggered ferroptosis in EC. CONCLUSIONS These findings collectively suggested that SOX4 inhibited ferroptosis and promoted proliferation of EC cells via the p53/SLC7A11 signaling. Our research unveiled a novel regulatory mechanism of ferroptosis in EC, offering promising perspectives for the development of EC therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongli Zhu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Affliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Song Xu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Affliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Creutzberg CL, Kim JW, Eminowicz G, Allanson E, Eberst L, Kim SI, Nout RA, Park JY, Lorusso D, Mileshkin L, Ottevanger PB, Brand A, Mezzanzanica D, Oza A, Gebski V, Pothuri B, Batley T, Gordon C, Mitra T, White H, Howitt B, Matias-Guiu X, Ray-Coquard I, Gaffney D, Small W, Miller A, Concin N, Powell MA, Stuart G, Bookman MA. Clinical research in endometrial cancer: consensus recommendations from the Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup. Lancet Oncol 2024; 25:e420-e431. [PMID: 39214113 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(24)00192-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2024] [Revised: 03/24/2024] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
The Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG) Endometrial Cancer Consensus Conference on Clinical Research (ECCC) was held in Incheon, South Korea, Nov 2-3, 2023. The aims were to develop consensus statements for future trials in endometrial cancer to achieve harmonisation on design elements, select important questions, and identify unmet needs. All 33 GCIG member groups participated in the development, refinement, and finalisation of 18 statements within four topic groups, addressing adjuvant treatment in high-risk disease; treatment for metastatic and recurrent disease; trial designs for rare endometrial cancer subgroups and special circumstances; and specific methodology and adaptation for trials in low-resource settings. In addition, eight areas of unmet need were identified. This was the first GCIG Consensus Conference to include patient advocates and an expert on inclusion, diversity, equity, and access to take part in all aspects of the process and output. Four early-career investigators were also selected for participation, ensuring that they represented different GCIG member groups and regions. Unanimous consensus was obtained for 16 of the 18 statements, with 97% concordance for the remaining two. Using the described methodology from previous Ovarian Cancer Consensus Conferences, this conference did not require even one minority statement. The high acceptance rate following active involvement in the preparation, discussion, and refinement of the statements by all representatives confirmed the consensus progress within a global academic setting, and the expectation that the ECCC will lead to greater harmonisation, actualisation, inclusion, and resolution of unmet needs in clinical research for individuals living with and beyond endometrial cancer worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carien L Creutzberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
| | - Jae-Weon Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Gemma Eminowicz
- Department of Clinical Oncology, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Emma Allanson
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Lauriane Eberst
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Se Ik Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Remi A Nout
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jeong-Yeol Park
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Domenica Lorusso
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Humanitas San Pio X, Milan, Italy; Humanitas University Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Linda Mileshkin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and University of Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Alison Brand
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital and University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Delia Mezzanzanica
- Department of Experimental Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Amit Oza
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, UHN - Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Val Gebski
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Bhavana Pothuri
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NJ, USA; Diversity and Health Equity for Clinical Trials, GOG-Foundation, Philadelphia, PA USA
| | - Tania Batley
- Ko Ngai Tūhoe te iwi, Kaitauwhiro Mātātahi Mokopuna Ora, Te Pūtahitanga o Te Waipounamu, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Carol Gordon
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group, London, ON, Canada
| | - Tina Mitra
- Kolkata Gynecological Oncology Trials and Translational Research Group (KolGOTrg), New Town, Kolkata, India
| | - Helen White
- Peaches Womb Cancer Trust, Manchester, UK; Cancer Research Advocates Forum, London, UK
| | - Brooke Howitt
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Xavier Matias-Guiu
- Department of Pathology, Hospital U de Bellvitge, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Pathology, Hospital U Arnau de Vilanova, University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain
| | | | - David Gaffney
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - William Small
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stritch School of Medicine, Cardinal Bernadin Cancer Center, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, IL, USA
| | - Austin Miller
- Department of Biostatistics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Nicole Concin
- Department of Gynaecology and Gynaecological Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Matthew A Powell
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Gavin Stuart
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Colombia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gaffney D, Suneja G, Weil C, Creutzberg C. International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Endometrial 2023 Is Better For Radiation Oncology Patients. Pract Radiat Oncol 2024:S1879-8500(24)00155-3. [PMID: 39019210 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2024.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2024] [Revised: 05/29/2024] [Accepted: 05/30/2024] [Indexed: 07/19/2024]
Abstract
The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2023 staging system for endometrial cancer has marked changes from the previous staging system instituted 14 years prior in 2009. The new staging system includes nonanatomic factors for the first time (lymphovascular space invasion and histology) and molecular classification, which impacts the stage in early-stage disease (IAmPOLEmut and IICmp53abn). The purpose of these changes was to provide (1) high accuracy in the predictive prognosis for patients and (2) identification of distinct treatment-relevant subgroups. Our understanding of the biology and natural history of endometrial cancer has undergone a radical transformation since the Cancer Genome Atlas results in 2013. The 2023 FIGO staging system harmonizes and integrates old and new knowledge on anatomic, histopathologic, and molecular features. Moreover, FIGO 2023 has distinct substages that improve adjuvant treatment decision making. Although the practicality of the new staging system has been debated, we postulate that FIGO 2023 is more useful for radiation oncologists aiming to provide personalized care recommendations. FIGO 2023 requires a change in our perception of a staging system, from a traditional anatomic borders-based system to a staging system integrating anatomy and tumor biology as pivotal prognostic factors for patients while providing important information for treatment decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Gaffney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
| | - Gita Suneja
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Chris Weil
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Carien Creutzberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gaffney D, Matias-Guiu X, Mutch D, Scambia G, Creutzberg C, Fotopoulou C, Berek JS, Concin N. 2023 FIGO staging system for endometrial cancer: The evolution of the revolution. Gynecol Oncol 2024; 184:245-253. [PMID: 38447389 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2023] [Revised: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Embracing the complex and diverse nature of the heterogenous group of malignancies that are included under the umbrella of "endometrial cancer" (EC) to better align prognosis with treatment recommendations, requires a more comprehensive staging system. Our goal at the development of the new FIGO staging was to provide 1) high accuracy in the predictive prognosis for a patient with EC, which is the genuine purpose of a staging system, and 2) identification of distinct treatment relevant subgroups. Since the publication of the 2009 staging system by the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 14 years ago (1, 2), our understanding of the biology and natural history of EC has undergone a radical transformation. The TGCA results in 2013 (3), and the many validation reports published since then (4-9), have taught us that "EC" is composed of at least four distinct molecularly defined diseases. Strong histopathologic markers reflecting tumor biology such as lymph vascular space invasion (LVSI) were identified. Importantly, anatomical borders were shown to lose their prognostic relevance for EC patients in the presence of dominant tumor biology-markers such as molecular subtypes/LVSI (10, 11). This emphasizes the integration of these novel markers into a prognostic staging system that aims to be relevant to patients. The 2023 FIGO staging system for EC harmonizes and integrates old and new knowledge on anatomic, histopathologic, and molecular features (12). It requires a change in our perception of a staging system, from a traditional purely anatomical borders-based system to an integrated staging system integrating anatomical borders and tumor biology as pivotal prognostic factors for EC patients while providing important information for treatment decision making. Therefore, the 2023 FIGO staging system demonstrates the logical next step in the evolution of the revolution in a patient-centric staging approach. Below, we elucidate the rationale for the FIGO 2023 endometrial cancer staging system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Gaffney
- University of Utah, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Xavier Matias-Guiu
- Department of Pathology, Hospital U de Bellvitge and Hospital U Arnau de Vilanova, Universities of Lleida and Barcelona, Institut de Recerca Biomèdica de Lleida, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Bellvitge, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David Mutch
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Carien Creutzberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Christina Fotopoulou
- Gynaecological Oncology, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Jonathan S Berek
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Women's Cancer Center, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Nicole Concin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria; Department of Gynaecology and Gynaecological Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hicks ML, Hicks MM, Mathews RP, Khabele D, Clare CA, Balogun O, Lawson YR, Tillman RH, Butler R, Spann CO, Parham GP. Racial disparities in endometrial cancer: Where are we after 26 years? Gynecol Oncol 2024; 184:236-242. [PMID: 38382150 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.01.054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2023] [Revised: 01/27/2024] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Endometrial cancer is the most commonly diagnosed female genital tract malignancy in the United States of America. Racial disparities surrounding this particular disease have been extensively investigated for over 26-years. We sought to determine if research in this area has led to any significant improvements in this disparity. METHODS We performed a rapid systematic review of English language publications on racial disparities in endometrial cancer among African American (AAW) and white American women (WAW), from 1997 to 2023. We looked at trends in incidence and survival; impact of known poor prognostic factors (stage at diagnosis, histological subtypes, grade); co-morbidities; differences in treatment (surgery, radiation and chemotherapy); socioeconomic factors; differences in biological and genetic markers; and policies/declarations. RESULTS During the period under review (1997-2023), there was a notable increase in both disease incidence (39%) and mortality (26%) rates for AAW, in comparison to WAW among whom the incidence rates increased by 2% and mortality rates rose, but 9% less than for AAW. It should be noted that the current incidence rate of 29.4% in AAW represent a reversal of what is was 26-years ago, when the incidence rate was 17.8%. In comparison to WAW, AAW had a higher prevalence of poor prognostic variables, more co-morbidities, lower income levels, less insurance coverage, and were more frequently under treated with surgery, chemotherapy and radiation. To date no actionable molecular/genetic markers have been identified. We were unable to locate any published recommendations or active programs of implementation strategies/policies designed to effectively mitigate the documented racial disparity. CONCLUSION Racial disparities in disease incidence and mortality in endometrial cancer rates between WAW and AAW have widened during a 26-year period of robust research, suggesting that current research alone is not enough to eliminate this disparity. Based on this rapid systematic review we have identified and analyzed the impact of causation variables on this disparity. Additionally, we have made strong and pertinent recommendations for the benefit of mitigating this escalating racial disparity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael L Hicks
- St. Joseph Mercy Oakland Cancer Center, Michigan Cancer Institute, 44405 Woodward Ave, Suite 202, Pontiac, MI 48324, USA; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Chapel Hill, 101 Manning Dr. Chapel Hill, NC 27514, USA.
| | - Maya M Hicks
- Anne Arundel Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2000 Medical Pkwy, Belcher Pavilion, Ste 309, Annapolis, MD 21401, USA
| | - Roland P Mathews
- Morehouse School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 720 Westview Drive, Atlanta, GA 30310, USA
| | - Dineo Khabele
- Washington University, School of Medicine Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 660 S. Euclid Ave, Mailstop 86064-37-1005, Saint Louis, MO 63110, USA.
| | - Camille A Clare
- SUNY Downstate Health Science University, Department of Obstetric and Gynecology, 450 Clarkson Ave, MSC-24, Brooklyn, NY 11203, USA.
| | - Onyinye Balogun
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Radiation Oncology, 525 East Street, Stich Radiation Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Yolanda R Lawson
- Made Well Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2509 Thomas Ave, Dallas, TX 75201, USA
| | - Ronda Henry Tillman
- University of Arkansas Medical Center, Winthrop P. Rockerfeller Cancer Institute, 449 Jack Stephens Drive, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA
| | - Raleigh Butler
- Princess Margaret Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 102 Thompson Blvd Nassau, Bahamas
| | - Cyril O Spann
- Piedmont Hospital, 1800 Howell Mill Road Northwest, suite 300, Atlanta, GA 30318, USA
| | - Groesbeck P Parham
- Charles Drew University of Medicine and Science, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1731 E 120th St., Los Angeles, CA 90059, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kopelman ZA, Tian C, Tumas J, Phippen NT, Tarney CM, Hope ER, Winkler SS, Jokajtys S, Kucera CW, Chan JK, Richardson MT, Kapp DS, Hamilton CA, Leath CA, Jones NL, Rocconi RP, Farley JH, Secord AA, Cosgrove CM, Powell MA, Klopp A, Walker JL, Fleming GF, Bateman NW, Conrads TP, Maxwell GL, Darcy KM. Disease progression, survival, and molecular disparities in Black and White patients with endometrioid endometrial carcinoma in real-world registries and GOG/NRG oncology randomized phase III clinical trials. Gynecol Oncol 2024; 183:103-114. [PMID: 38593674 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.03.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2024] [Revised: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Investigate racial disparities in outcomes and molecular features in Black and White patients with endometrioid endometrial carcinoma (EEC). METHODS Black and White patients diagnosed with EEC who underwent hysterectomy ± adjuvant treatment in SEER, National Cancer Database (NCDB), the Genomics Evidence Neoplasia Information Exchange (GENIE) project (v.13.0), and eight NCI-sponsored randomized phase III clinical trials (RCTs) were studied. Hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated for cancer-related death (CRD), non-cancer death (NCD), and all-cause death. RESULTS Black (n = 4397) vs. White (n = 47,959) patients in SEER had a HR (95% CI) of 2.04 (1.87-2.23) for CRD and 1.22 (1.09-1.36) for NCD. In NCDB, the HR (95% CI) for death in Black (n = 13,468) vs. White (n = 155,706) patients was 1.52 (1.46-1.58) dropping to 1.29 (1.23-1.36) after propensity-score matching for age, comorbidity, income, insurance, grade, stage, LVSI, and treatment. In GENIE, Black (n = 109) vs. White (n = 1780) patients had fewer PTEN, PIK3R1, FBXW7, NF1, mTOR, CCND1, and PI3K-pathway-related gene mutations. In contrast, TP53 and DNA-repair-related gene mutation frequency as well as tumor mutational burden-high status were similar in Black and White patients. In RCTs, Black (n = 187) vs. White (n = 2877) patients were more likely to have advanced or recurrent disease, higher grade, worse performance status and progressive disease. Risk of death in Black vs. White patients in RCTs was 2.19 (1.77-2.71) persisting to 1.32 (1.09-1.61) after matching for grade, stage, and treatment arm while balancing age and performance status. CONCLUSIONS Differences exist in clinical presentation, outcomes, and molecular features in Black vs. White patients with EEC in real-world registries and RCTs. Targeted-drug development, strategies to modify social determinants, and diverse inclusion in RCTs are approaches to reduce disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary A Kopelman
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Chunqiao Tian
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; The Henry M Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jordyn Tumas
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Neil T Phippen
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Christopher M Tarney
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Erica R Hope
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Stuart S Winkler
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Suzanne Jokajtys
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Calen W Kucera
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - John K Chan
- Palo Alto Medical Foundation, California Pacific Medical Center, Sutter Health, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Michael T Richardson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Daniel S Kapp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Chad A Hamilton
- Gynecologic Oncology Section, Women's Services and The Ochsner Cancer Institute, Ochsner Health, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Charles A Leath
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Nathaniel L Jones
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mitchell Cancer Institute, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA
| | - Rodney P Rocconi
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cancer Center & Research Institute, the University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA
| | - John H Farley
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Center for Women's Health, Cancer Institute, Dignity Health St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | - Casey M Cosgrove
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Matthew A Powell
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Ann Klopp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Joan L Walker
- Gynecologic Oncology Division, Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma University Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Gini F Fleming
- Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Nicholas W Bateman
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Center for Women's Health, Cancer Institute, Dignity Health St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA; The Henry M Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Thomas P Conrads
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; The Henry M Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, MD, USA; Women's Health Integrated Research Center, Inova Women's Service Line, Inova Health System, Falls Church, VA, USA
| | - G Larry Maxwell
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; The Henry M Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, MD, USA; Women's Health Integrated Research Center, Inova Women's Service Line, Inova Health System, Falls Church, VA, USA.
| | - Kathleen M Darcy
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; The Henry M Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Soberanis Pina P, Lheureux S. Novel Molecular Targets in Endometrial Cancer: Mechanisms and Perspectives for Therapy. Biologics 2024; 18:79-93. [PMID: 38529411 PMCID: PMC10962462 DOI: 10.2147/btt.s369783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/27/2024]
Abstract
Endometrial cancer (EC) has a high epidemiological impact with incidence and mortality rising worldwide. In recent years, the integration of the pathologic and molecular classification has provided relevant information to understand the heterogeneity in the biology of EC, which led to the evolution in the management of patients. Currently, therapeutic breakthroughs have been made in advanced EC to improve oncologic outcomes, with efforts to include patient reported outcomes. Precision and personalized medicine are under way in EC exploring different combination approaches to target cross-talk pathways, cancer cell microenvironment, and metabolic vulnerabilities and improve drug delivery. Yet, collaborative efforts are needed to face the challenges in practice by refining patient selection, ideal biomarker identification, and de-escalation of therapies according to emerging molecular and genomic features of EC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pamela Soberanis Pina
- Department of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Stephanie Lheureux
- Department of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sakamoto I, Kagami K, Nozaki T, Hirotsu Y, Amemiya K, Oyama T, Omata M. In Response to p53 Immunohistochemical Staining and TP53 Gene Mutations in Endometrial Cancer: Does Null Pattern Correlate With Prognosis? Am J Surg Pathol 2024; 48:374-375. [PMID: 38238975 DOI: 10.1097/pas.0000000000002181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/20/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Ikuko Sakamoto
- Departments of Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Genome Analysis Center, Yamanashi Central Hospital, Yamanashi
| | - Keiko Kagami
- Departments of Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Genome Analysis Center, Yamanashi Central Hospital, Yamanashi
| | - Takahiro Nozaki
- Departments of Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Genome Analysis Center, Yamanashi Central Hospital, Yamanashi
| | - Yosuke Hirotsu
- Genome Analysis Center, Yamanashi Central Hospital, Yamanashi
| | - Kenji Amemiya
- Genome Analysis Center, Yamanashi Central Hospital, Yamanashi
| | | | - Masao Omata
- Genome Analysis Center, Yamanashi Central Hospital, Yamanashi
- Departments of Gastroenterology University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Illah O, Adeeko D, Olaitan A, Gentry-Maharaj A. Racioethnic Disparities in Endometrial Cancer Outcomes. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14:417. [PMID: 38396458 PMCID: PMC10887632 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14040417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2023] [Revised: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 02/09/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Black women are twice as likely to die from endometrial cancer (EC) compared with white women. This represents one of the worst racioethnic disparities amongst all cancers globally. Compared with white women, black women are more likely to be diagnosed with advanced EC, have more barriers to accessing care and experience increased delays in obtaining an EC diagnosis and commencing treatment. Histological and molecular differences place black women at higher risk of being diagnosed with more aggressive EC subtypes that carry less favourable outcomes. Furthermore, EC diagnostic pathways are less reliable in black women, and black women are less likely to receive evidence-based treatment for EC. This racioethnic disparity in EC outcomes exists both in the UK and US, despite differences in healthcare systems. This review methodically describes the key factors along the patient journey that contribute to the disparity in black women and proposes multifaceted approaches to lessen these gaps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ojone Illah
- Department of Women’s Cancer, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women’s Health, University College London, London WC1E 6DD, UK
| | - Deborah Adeeko
- Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women’s Health, University College London, London WC1E 6AU, UK
| | - Adeola Olaitan
- Department of Women’s Cancer, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women’s Health, University College London, London WC1E 6DD, UK
| | - Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj
- Department of Women’s Cancer, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women’s Health, University College London, London WC1E 6DD, UK
- Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London WC1V 6LJ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Burkett WC, Clontz AD, Keku TO, Bae-Jump V. The interplay of obesity, microbiome dynamics, and innovative anti-obesity strategies in the context of endometrial cancer progression and therapeutic approaches. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer 2023; 1878:189000. [PMID: 37844671 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2023.189000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2023] [Revised: 10/09/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 10/18/2023]
Abstract
Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecologic malignancy in the United States, and its incidence and mortality are rising. Obesity is more tightly associated with EC than any other cancer. Thus, the rising prevalence of obesity and associated risk factors, including diabetes and insulin resistance, cause alarm. The metabolic derangements of obesity increase the bioavailability of estrogen, hyperinsulinemia, and inflammation in a complex system with direct and indirect effects on the endometrium, resulting in proliferation and, ultimately, carcinogenesis. In addition, the gut dysbiosis associated with obesity helps contribute to these metabolic derangements, priming an individual for developing EC and perhaps affecting treatment efficacy. More recent studies are beginning to explore obesity's effect on the local tumor microbiome of EC and its role in carcinogenesis. Significant and sustained weight loss in individuals can considerably decrease the risk of EC, likely through reversal of the altered metabolism and dysbiosis resulting obesity. Bariatric surgery is the gold standard for successful weight loss and highlights how reversing of the systemic effects of obesity can reduce EC risk. However, the current limited availability, knowledge, and imposed stigma of bariatric surgery prohibits population-level reductions in EC. Therefore, effective and maintainable non-surgical dietary and pharmacologic interventions are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wesley C Burkett
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, United States of America.
| | - Angela D Clontz
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Nutrition Research Institute, United States of America.
| | - Temitope O Keku
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Medicine, Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, United States of America.
| | - Victoria Bae-Jump
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, United States of America; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|