1
|
Koeneman BJ, Schreibelt G, Gorris MAJ, Hins - de Bree S, Westdorp H, Ottevanger PB, de Vries IJM. Dendritic cell vaccination combined with carboplatin/paclitaxel for metastatic endometrial cancer patients: results of a phase I/II trial. Front Immunol 2024; 15:1368103. [PMID: 38444861 PMCID: PMC10912556 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1368103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2024] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Metastatic endometrial cancer (mEC) continues to have a poor prognosis despite the introduction of several novel therapies including immune checkpoints inhibitors. Dendritic cell (DC) vaccination is known to be a safe immunotherapeutic modality that can induce immunological and clinical responses in patients with solid tumors. Platinum-based chemotherapy is known to act synergistically with immunotherapy by selectively depleting suppressive immune cells. Therefore, we investigated the immunological efficacy of combined chemoimmunotherapy with an autologous DC vaccine and carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy. Study design This is a prospective, exploratory, single-arm phase I/II study (NCT04212377) in 7 patients with mEC. The DC vaccine consisted of blood-derived conventional and plasmacytoid dendritic cells, loaded with known mEC antigens Mucin-1 and Survivin. Chemotherapy consisted of carboplatin/paclitaxel, given weekly for 6 cycles and three-weekly for 3 cycles. The primary endpoint was immunological vaccine efficacy; secondary endpoints were safety and feasibility. Results Production of DC vaccines was successful in five out of seven patients. These five patients started study treatment and all were able to complete the entire treatment schedule. Antigen-specific responses could be demonstrated in two of the five patients who were treated. All patients had at least one adverse event grade 3 or higher. Treatment-related adverse events grade ≥3 were related to chemotherapy rather than DC vaccination; neutropenia was most common. Suppressive myeloid cells were selectively depleted in peripheral blood after chemotherapy. Conclusion DC vaccination can be safely combined with carboplatin/paclitaxel in patients with metastatic endometrial cancer and induces antigen-specific responses in a minority of patients. Longitudinal immunological phenotyping is suggestive of a synergistic effect of the combination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bouke J. Koeneman
- Department of Medical BioSciences, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Gerty Schreibelt
- Department of Medical BioSciences, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Mark A. J. Gorris
- Department of Medical BioSciences, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | | | - Harm Westdorp
- Department of Medical BioSciences, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
van der Ploeg P, Hendrikse CSE, Thijs AMJ, Westgeest HM, Smedts HPM, Vos MC, Jalving M, Lok CAR, Boere IA, van Ham MAPC, Ottevanger PB, Westermann AM, Mom CH, Lalisang RI, Lambrechts S, Bekkers RLM, Piek JMJ. Phenotype-guided targeted therapy based on functional signal transduction pathway activity in recurrent ovarian cancer patients: The STAPOVER study protocol. Heliyon 2024; 10:e23170. [PMID: 38187310 PMCID: PMC10770441 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Revised: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective Ovarian cancer is the fifth cause of cancer-related death among women. The benefit of targeted therapy for ovarian cancer patients is limited even if treatment is stratified by molecular signature. There remains a high unmet need for alternative diagnostics that better predict targeted therapy, as current diagnostics are generally inaccurate predictors. Quantitative assessment of functional signal transduction pathway (STP) activity from mRNA measurements of target genes is an alternative approach. Therefore, we aim to identify aberrantly activated STPs in tumour tissue of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer and start phenotype-guided targeted therapy to improve survival without compromising quality of life. Study design Patients with recurrent ovarian cancer and either 1) have platinum-resistant disease, 2) refrain from standard therapy or 3) are asymptomatic and not yet eligible for standard therapy will be included in this multi-centre prospective cohort study with multiple stepwise executed treatment arms. Targeted therapy will be available for patients with aberrantly high functional activity of the oestrogen receptor, androgen receptor, phosphoinositide 3-kinase or Hedgehog STP. The primary endpoint of this study is the progression-free survival (PFS) ratio (PFS2/PFS1 ratio) according to RECIST 1.1 determined by the PFS on matched targeted therapy (PFS2) compared to PFS on prior therapy (PFS1). Secondary endpoints include among others best overall response, overall survival, side effects, health-related quality of life and cost-effectiveness. Conclusion The results of this study will show the clinical applicability of STP activity in selecting recurrent ovarian cancer patients for effective therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phyllis van der Ploeg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Catharina Cancer Institute, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Cynthia SE. Hendrikse
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Catharina Cancer Institute, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Anna MJ. Thijs
- Department of Internal Medicine and Catharina Cancer Institute, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Hans M. Westgeest
- Department of Internal Medicine, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands
| | - Huberdina PM. Smedts
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands
| | - M Caroline Vos
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | - Mathilde Jalving
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Christianne AR. Lok
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ingrid A. Boere
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Centre Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maaike APC. van Ham
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Anneke M. Westermann
- Department of Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Constantijne H. Mom
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Roy I. Lalisang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre +, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Sandrina Lambrechts
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre +, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Ruud LM. Bekkers
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Catharina Cancer Institute, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Jurgen MJ. Piek
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Catharina Cancer Institute, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
van de Water LF, Bos–van den Hoek DW, Kuijper SC, van Laarhoven HWM, Creemers GJ, Dohmen SE, Fiebrich HB, Ottevanger PB, Sommeijer DW, de Vos FYF, Smets EMA, Henselmans I. Potential Adverse Outcomes of Shared Decision Making about Palliative Cancer Treatment: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Trial. Med Decis Making 2024; 44:89-101. [PMID: 37953598 PMCID: PMC10712204 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x231208448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While shared decision making (SDM) is advocated for ethical reasons and beneficial outcomes, SDM might also negatively affect patients with incurable cancer. The current study explored whether SDM, and an oncologist training in SDM, are associated with adverse outcomes (i.e., patient anxiety, tension, helplessness/hopelessness, decisional uncertainty, and reduced fighting spirit). DESIGN A secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial investigating the effects of SDM interventions in the context of advanced cancer. The relations between observed SDM (OPTION12), specific SDM elements (4SDM), oncologist SDM training, and adverse outcomes were analyzed. We modeled adverse outcomes as a multivariate phenomenon, followed by univariate regressions if significant. RESULTS In total, 194 patients consulted by 31 oncologists were included. In a multivariate analysis, observed SDM and adverse outcomes were significantly related. More specifically, more observed SDM in the consultation was related to patients reporting more tension (P = 0.002) and more decisional uncertainty (P = 0.004) at 1 wk after the consultation. The SDM element "informing about the options" was especially found to be related to adverse outcomes, specifically to more helplessness/hopelessness (P = 0.002) and more tension (P = 0.016) at 1 wk after the consultation. Whether the patient consulted an oncologist who had received SDM training or not was not significantly related to adverse outcomes. No relations with long-term adverse outcomes were found. CONCLUSIONS It is important for oncologists to realize that for some patients, SDM may temporarily be associated with negative emotions. Further research is needed to untangle which, when, and how adverse outcomes might occur and whether and how burden may be minimized for patients. HIGHLIGHTS Observed shared decision making was related to more tension and uncertainty postconsultation in advanced cancer patientsHowever, training oncologists in SDM did not affect adverse outcomes.Further research is needed to untangle which, when, and how adverse outcomes might occur and how burden may be minimized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Loïs F. van de Water
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Quality of Care, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Danique W. Bos–van den Hoek
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Quality of Care, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Steven C. Kuijper
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hanneke W. M. van Laarhoven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Geert-Jan Creemers
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Serge E. Dohmen
- Department of Medical Oncology, BovenIJ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Petronella B. Ottevanger
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Filip Y. F. de Vos
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ellen M. A. Smets
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Quality of Care, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Inge Henselmans
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Overbeek JK, Guchelaar NAD, Mohmaed Ali MI, Ottevanger PB, Bloemendal HJ, Koolen SLW, Mathijssen RHJ, Boere IA, Hamberg P, Huitema ADR, Sonke GS, Opdam FL, Ter Heine R, van Erp NP. Pharmacokinetic boosting of olaparib: A randomised, cross-over study (PROACTIVE-study). Eur J Cancer 2023; 194:113346. [PMID: 37806255 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Revised: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/09/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pharmacokinetic (PK) boosting is the intentional use of a drug-drug interaction to enhance systemic drug exposure. PK boosting of olaparib, a CYP3A-substrate, has the potential to reduce PK variability and financial burden. The aim of this study was to investigate equivalence of a boosted, reduced dose of olaparib compared to the non-boosted standard dose. METHODS This cross-over, multicentre trial compared olaparib 300 mg twice daily (BID) with olaparib 100 mg BID boosted with the strong CYP3A-inhibitor cobicistat 150 mg BID. Patients were randomised to the standard therapy followed by the boosted therapy, or vice versa. After seven days of each therapy, dense PK sampling was performed for noncompartmental PK analysis. Equivalence was defined as a 90% Confidence Interval (CI) of the geometric mean ratio (GMR) of the boosted versus standard therapy area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0-12 h) within no-effect boundaries. These boundaries were set at 0.57-1.25, based on previous pharmacokinetic studies with olaparib capsules and tablets. RESULTS Of 15 included patients, 12 were eligible for PK analysis. The GMR of the AUC0-12 h was 1.45 (90% CI 1.27-1.65). No grade ≥3 adverse events were reported during the study. CONCLUSIONS Boosting a 100 mg BID olaparib dose with cobicistat increases olaparib exposure 1.45-fold, compared to the standard dose of 300 mg BID. Equivalence of the boosted olaparib was thus not established. Boosting remains a promising strategy to reduce the olaparib dose as cobicistat increases olaparib exposure Adequate tolerability of the boosted therapy with higher exposure should be established.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanneke K Overbeek
- Department of Pharmacy, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Gelderland, the Netherlands.
| | - Niels A D Guchelaar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, South Holland, the Netherlands
| | - Ma Ida Mohmaed Ali
- Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, North Holland, the Netherlands
| | - Petronella B Ottevanger
- Department of Medical Oncology, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Gelderland, the Netherlands
| | - Haiko J Bloemendal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Gelderland, the Netherlands
| | - Stijn L W Koolen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, South Holland, the Netherlands; Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, South Holland, the Netherlands
| | - Ron H J Mathijssen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, South Holland, the Netherlands
| | - Ingrid A Boere
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, South Holland, the Netherlands
| | - Paul Hamberg
- Department of Internal Medicine, Franciscus Gasthuis and Vlietland, Rotterdam, South Holland, the Netherlands
| | - Alwin D R Huitema
- Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, North Holland, the Netherlands; Department of Pharmacology, Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Gabe S Sonke
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, North Holland, the Netherlands
| | - Frans L Opdam
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, North Holland, the Netherlands
| | - Rob Ter Heine
- Department of Pharmacy, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Gelderland, the Netherlands
| | - Nielka P van Erp
- Department of Pharmacy, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Gelderland, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ledermann JA, Shapira-Frommer R, Santin AD, Lisyanskaya AS, Pignata S, Vergote I, Raspagliesi F, Sonke GS, Birrer M, Provencher DM, Sehouli J, Colombo N, González-Martín A, Oaknin A, Ottevanger PB, Rudaitis V, Kobie J, Nebozhyn M, Edmondson M, Sun Y, Cristescu R, Jelinic P, Keefe SM, Matulonis UA. Molecular determinants of clinical outcomes of pembrolizumab in recurrent ovarian cancer: Exploratory analysis of KEYNOTE-100. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 178:119-129. [PMID: 37862791 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2023] [Revised: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 09/23/2023] [Indexed: 10/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This prespecified exploratory analysis evaluated the association of gene expression signatures, tumor mutational burden (TMB), and multiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC) tumor microenvironment-associated cell phenotypes with clinical outcomes of pembrolizumab in advanced recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC) from the phase II KEYNOTE-100 study. METHODS Pembrolizumab-treated patients with evaluable RNA-sequencing (n = 317), whole exome sequencing (n = 293), or select mIHC (n = 125) data were evaluated. The association between outcomes (objective response rate [ORR], progression-free survival [PFS], and overall survival [OS]) and gene expression signatures (T-cell-inflamed gene expression profile [TcellinfGEP] and 10 non-TcellinfGEP signatures), TMB, and prespecified mIHC cell phenotype densities as continuous variables was evaluated using logistic (ORR) and Cox proportional hazards regression (PFS; OS). One-sided p-values were calculated at prespecified α = 0.05 for TcellinfGEP, TMB, and mIHC cell phenotypes and at α = 0.10 for non-TcellinfGEP signatures; all but TcellinfGEP and TMB were adjusted for multiplicity. RESULTS No evidence of associations between ORR and key axes of gene expression was observed. Negative associations were observed between outcomes and TcellinfGEP-adjusted glycolysis (PFS, adjusted-p = 0.019; OS, adjusted-p = 0.085) and hypoxia (PFS, adjusted-p = 0.064) signatures. TMB as a continuous variable was not associated with outcomes (p > 0.05). Positive associations were observed between densities of myeloid cell phenotypes CD11c+ and CD11c+/MHCII-/CD163-/CD68- in the tumor compartment and ORR (adjusted-p = 0.025 and 0.013, respectively). CONCLUSIONS This exploratory analysis in advanced ROC did not find evidence for associations between gene expression signatures and outcomes of pembrolizumab. mIHC analysis suggests CD11c+ and CD11c+/MHCII-/CD163-/CD68- phenotypes representing myeloid cell populations may be associated with improved outcomes with pembrolizumab in advanced ROC. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02674061.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan A Ledermann
- Department of Oncology, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Ronnie Shapira-Frommer
- The Ella Lemelbaum Institute for Immuno-Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel HaShomer Hospital, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Alessandro D Santin
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Alla S Lisyanskaya
- Department of Oncogynecology, St. Petersburg City Clinical Oncology Dispensary, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - Sandro Pignata
- Department of Urology and Gynecology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Gabe S Sonke
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Michael Birrer
- UAMS Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute, Little Rock, AR, United States
| | - Diane M Provencher
- Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Institut du Cancer de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Jalid Sehouli
- Gynecology with Center of Oncological Surgery, Charité-Medical University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Nicoletta Colombo
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy; European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio González-Martín
- Department of Medical Oncology and Program in Solid Tumors-Cima, Cancer Center Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ana Oaknin
- Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | - P B Ottevanger
- Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Vilius Rudaitis
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vilnius University Institute of Clinical Medicine, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Julie Kobie
- Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, United States
| | | | | | - Yuan Sun
- Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, United States
| | | | | | | | - Ursula A Matulonis
- Division of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hendrikse CSE, Theelen PMM, van der Ploeg P, Westgeest HM, Boere IA, Thijs AMJ, Ottevanger PB, van de Stolpe A, Lambrechts S, Bekkers RLM, Piek JMJ. The potential of RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK (MAPK) signaling pathway inhibitors in ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 171:83-94. [PMID: 36841040 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.01.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2022] [Revised: 01/01/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK (MAPK) pathway plays a role in ovarian carcinogenesis. Low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (LGSOC) frequently harbors activating MAPK mutations. MAPK inhibitors have been used in small subsets of ovarian carcinoma (OC) patients to control tumor growth. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of MAPK inhibitors in OC patients. We aimed to determine the clinical benefit rate (CBR), the subgroup of MAPK inhibitors with the best CBR and overall response rate (ORR), and the most common adverse events. METHODS We conducted a search in PubMed, Embase via Ovid, the Cochrane library and clinicaltrials.gov on studies evaluating the efficacy of single MAPK pathway inhibition with MAPK pathway inhibitors in OC patients. Our primary outcome included the CBR, defined by the proportion of patients with stable disease (SD), complete (CR) and partial response (PR). Secondary outcomes included the ORR (including PR and CR) and grade 3 and 4 adverse events. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model. RESULTS We included nine studies with a total of 319 OC patients, for which we determined a pooled CBR of 63% (95%-CI 39-84%, I2 = 92%). Combined treatment with Raf- and MEK inhibitors in in BRAFv600 mutated LGSOC (n = 6) had the greatest efficacy with a CBR of 100% and ORR of 83%. MEK inhibitors had the best efficacy as a single agent. Subgroup analysis by tumor histology demonstrated a significantly higher CBR and ORR in patients with LGSOC, with a pooled CBR and ORR of 87% (95%-CI 81-92%, I2 = 0%) and 27% (95%-CI 10-48%, I2 = 77%) respectively. Adverse events of grade 3 or higher were reported frequently: 123 in 167 patients. CONCLUSIONS MEK inhibitors are the most promising single agents in (LGS)OC. However, dual MAPK pathway inhibition should be considered in patients with a BRAFv600 mutation, or non-mutated OC with depleted treatment options due indications of higher efficacy and tolerable toxicity profiles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C S E Hendrikse
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Catharina Cancer Institute, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands; GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - P M M Theelen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Catharina Cancer Institute, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - P van der Ploeg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Catharina Cancer Institute, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands; GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - H M Westgeest
- Department of Internal Medicine, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands
| | - I A Boere
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A M J Thijs
- Department of Internal Medicine and Catharina Cancer Institute, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - P B Ottevanger
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - A van de Stolpe
- Drug Companion Diagnostics Company - Therapeutics (DCDC-Tx), Vught, the Netherlands
| | - S Lambrechts
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - R L M Bekkers
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Catharina Cancer Institute, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands; GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - J M J Piek
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Catharina Cancer Institute, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
de Jong LAW, Lambert M, van Erp NP, de Vries L, Chatelut E, Ottevanger PB. Systemic exposure to cisplatin and paclitaxel after intraperitoneal chemotherapy in ovarian cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2023; 91:247-256. [PMID: 36892677 PMCID: PMC10033566 DOI: 10.1007/s00280-023-04512-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the systemic exposure to cisplatin and paclitaxel after adjuvant intraperitoneal administration in patients with advanced ovarian cancer who underwent primary debulking surgery. This could provide an explanation for the high incidence of systemic adverse events associated with this treatment regimen. METHODS This is a prospective pharmacokinetic study in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer who were treated with intraperitoneal administered cisplatin and paclitaxel. Plasma and peritoneal fluid samples were obtained during the first treatment cycle. The systemic exposure to cisplatin and paclitaxel was determined and compared to previously published exposure data after intravenous administration. An exploratory analysis was performed to investigate the relation between systemic exposure to cisplatin and the occurrence of adverse events. RESULTS Pharmacokinetics of ultrafiltered cisplatin were studied in eleven evaluable patients. The geometric mean [range] peak plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma-concentration time curve (AUC0-24 h) for cisplatin was 2.2 [1.8-2.7] mg/L and 10.1 [9.0-12.6] mg h/L, with a coefficient of variation (CV%) of 14 and 13.0%, respectively. The geometric mean [range] observed plasma concentration of paclitaxel was 0.06 [0.04-0.08] mg/L. No correlation was found between systemic exposure to ultrafiltered cisplatin and adverse events. CONCLUSION Systemic exposure to ultrafiltered cisplatin after intraperitoneal administration is high. In addition to a local effect, this provides a pharmacological explanation for high incidence of adverse events seen after intraperitoneal administration of high-dose cisplatin. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration number NCT02861872.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Loek A W de Jong
- Department of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Center Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, P.O. Box 9101, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Marie Lambert
- Institut Claudius‑Regaud, and Université de Toulouse, Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Toulouse, Inserm, 1, avenue Irène Joliot‑Curie, Toulouse, France
| | - Nielka P van Erp
- Department of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Center Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, P.O. Box 9101, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Lukas de Vries
- Department of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Center Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, P.O. Box 9101, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Etienne Chatelut
- Institut Claudius‑Regaud, and Université de Toulouse, Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Toulouse, Inserm, 1, avenue Irène Joliot‑Curie, Toulouse, France
| | - Petronella B Ottevanger
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
van der Velden NC, van Laarhoven HW, Nieuwkerk PT, Kuijper SC, Sommeijer DW, Ottevanger PB, Fiebrich HB, Dohmen SE, Creemers GJ, de Vos FY, Smets EM, Henselmans I. Attitudes Toward Striving for Quality and Length of Life Among Patients With Advanced Cancer and a Poor Prognosis. JCO Oncol Pract 2022; 18:e1818-e1830. [DOI: 10.1200/op.22.00185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE: When deliberating palliative cancer treatment, insight into patients' attitudes toward striving for quality of life (QL) and length of life (LL) may facilitate goal-concordant care. We investigated the (1) attitudes of patients with advanced cancer toward striving for QL and/or LL and whether these change over time, and (2) characteristics associated with these attitudes (over time). METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial on improving shared decision making (SDM), without differentiation between intervention arms. Patients (n = 173) with advanced cancer, a median life expectancy of < 12 months without anticancer treatment, and a median survival benefit of < 6 months from systemic therapy were included in seven Dutch hospitals. We used audio-recorded consultations and surveys at baseline (T0), shortly after the consultation (T2), at 3 and 6 months (T3 and T4). Primary outcomes were patients' attitudes toward striving for QL and LL (Quality Quantity Questionnaire; T2, T3, and T4). RESULTS: Overall, patients' attitudes toward striving for QL became less positive over 6 months ( P < .01); attitudes toward striving for LL did not change on group level. Studying individual patients, 76% showed changes in their attitudes toward striving for QL and/or LL at some point during the study, which occurred in various directions. More helplessness/hopelessness ( P < .001), less fighting spirit ( P < .05), less state anxiety ( P < .001), and more observed SDM ( P < .05) related to more positive attitudes toward striving for QL. Lower education, less helplessness/hopelessness, more fighting spirit, and more state anxiety ( P < .001) related to more positive attitudes toward striving for LL. CONCLUSION: Oncologists may explore patients' attitudes toward striving for QL and LL repeatedly and address patients' coping style and emotions during SDM to facilitate goal-concordant care throughout the last phase of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naomi C.A. van der Velden
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hanneke W.M. van Laarhoven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Pythia T. Nieuwkerk
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Steven C. Kuijper
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Dirkje W. Sommeijer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Flevoziekenhuis, Almere, the Netherlands
| | - Petronella B. Ottevanger
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Serge E. Dohmen
- Department of Medical Oncology, BovenIJ Ziekenhuis, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Geert-Jan Creemers
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Filip Y.F.L. de Vos
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Ellen M.A. Smets
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Inge Henselmans
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
van de Kruis N, van der Ploeg P, Wilting JH, Caroline Vos M, Thijs AM, de Hullu J, Ottevanger PB, Lok C, Piek JM. The progression-free survival ratio as outcome measure in recurrent ovarian carcinoma patients: Current and future perspectives. Gynecol Oncol Rep 2022; 42:101035. [PMID: 35898197 PMCID: PMC9309411 DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2022.101035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
The progression-free survival (PFS) ratio represents a meaningful outcome measure. The median PFS-ratio differs significantly between histological subtypes of ovarian carcinoma. Thresholds for clinical benefit should be adjusted for clinicopathological factors. Treatment response during PFS1 may result in a distorted view of the PFS-ratio.
Objective Clinical efficacy of cytostatic anticancer agents can be determined with the progression-free survival (PFS) ratio. This outcome measure compares PFS achieved by a new treatment (PFS2) to the PFS of the most recent treatment on which the patient has experienced progression (PFS1). Clinical benefit has been defined as a PFS-ratio (PFS2/PFS1) > 1.3. However, in order to demonstrate significant benefit, trial designs require an assumption on the proportion of patients who reach this ratio during palliative options. For ovarian carcinoma, data is lacking to support this assumption. Therefore in this study, we assess the PFS-ratio in recurrent ovarian carcinoma patients treated with current palliative options. Methods We included 67 patients with recurrent high-grade serous (HGSC, 73.1%) or low-grade (LGOC, 26.9%) ovarian carcinoma. We determined the median PFS-ratio and investigated the association with clinicopathological characteristics. Results Overall, we observed a median PFS-ratio of 0.69. The proportion of patients with a PFS-ratio > 1.3 was 22.4%. For HGSC patients, the median PFS-ratio was significantly lower than for LGOC patients (respectively, 0.58 and 1.26, p = 0.007). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the LGOC subtype and CA125 tumor marker concentration were independent factors related to a PFS-ratio > 1.3. Conclusions Although the PFS-ratio represents a meaningful outcome measure in studies investigating cytostatic anticancer agents, we conclude that it is influenced by tumor histology and biological behavior. In future research, these factors should be taken into account when determining thresholds for clinical benefit in trial designs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nienke van de Kruis
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Phyllis van der Ploeg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jody H.C. Wilting
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - M. Caroline Vos
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Hilvarenbeekseweg 60, 5000 LC Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Anna M.J. Thijs
- Department of Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Joanne de Hullu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Petronella B. Ottevanger
- Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Christianne Lok
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Center of Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, location Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jurgen M.J. Piek
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands
- Corresponding author at: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Catharina Cancer Institute, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, Eindhoven 5623EJ, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Marth C, Abreu MH, Andersen KK, Aro KM, de Lurdes Batarda M, Boll D, Ekmann-Gade AW, Haltia UM, Hansen J, Haug AJ, Høgdall C, Korach J, Lassus H, Lindemann K, Van Nieuwenhuysen E, Ottevanger PB, Polterauer S, Schnack TH. Real-life data on treatment and outcomes in advanced ovarian cancer: An observational, multinational cohort study (RESPONSE trial). Cancer 2022; 128:3080-3089. [PMID: 35714310 PMCID: PMC9545328 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2022] [Revised: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Background This study aimed to describe the treatment strategies and outcomes for women with newly diagnosed advanced high‐grade serous or endometrioid ovarian cancer (OC). Methods This observational study collected real‐world medical record data from eight Western countries on the diagnostic workup, clinical outcomes, and treatment of adult women with newly diagnosed advanced (Stage III–IV) high‐grade serous or endometrioid OC. Patients were selected backward in time from April 1, 2018 (the index date), with a target of 120 patients set per country, followed for ≥20 months. Results Of the 1119 women included, 66.9% had Stage III disease, 11.7% had a deleterious BRCA mutation, and 26.6% received bevacizumab; 40.8% and 39.3% underwent primary debulking surgery (PDS) and interval debulking surgery (IDS), respectively. Of the patients who underwent PDS, 55.5% had no visible residual disease (VRD); 63.9% of the IDS patients had no VRD. According to physician‐assessed responses (at the first assessment after diagnosis and treatment), 53.2% of the total population had a complete response and 25.7% had a partial response to first‐line chemotherapy after surgery. After ≥20 months of follow‐up, 32.9% of the patients were disease‐free, 46.4% had progressive disease, and 20.6% had died. Bevacizumab use had a significant positive effect on overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.62; 95% CI, 0.42–0.91; p = .01). A deleterious BRCA status had a significant positive effect on progression‐free survival (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.41–0.84; p < .01). Conclusions Women with advanced high‐grade serous or endometrioid OC have a poor prognosis. Bevacizumab use and a deleterious BRCA status were found to improve survival in this real‐world population. Lay summary Patients with advanced (Stage III or IV) ovarian cancer (OC) have a poor prognosis. The standard treatment options of surgery and chemotherapy extend life beyond diagnosis for 5 years or more in only approximately 45% of patients. This study was aimed at describing the standard of care in eight Western countries and estimating how many patients who are diagnosed with high‐grade serous or endometrioid OC could potentially be eligible for first‐line poly(adenosine diphosphate ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) maintenance therapy. The results highlight the poor prognosis for these patients and suggest that a significant proportion (79%) would potentially be eligible for first‐line PARPi maintenance treatment.
In women diagnosed with high‐grade advanced serous or endometrioid ovarian cancer, bevacizumab use had a significant positive effect on overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.62; 95% CI, 0.42–0.91; p = .01), and a deleterious BRCA status had a significant positive effect on progression‐free survival (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.41–0.84; p < .01). According to clinical responses following surgery and first‐line chemotherapy, almost 8 in 10 women diagnosed with high‐grade advanced serous or endometrioid ovarian cancer would potentially be eligible for first‐line poly(adenosine diphosphate ribose) polymerase inhibitor maintenance treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Marth
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Miguel Henriques Abreu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | | | - Karoliina M Aro
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | | | - Dorry Boll
- Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | | | - Ulla-Maija Haltia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Jesper Hansen
- Medical Affairs, AstraZeneca Nordic, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ala Jabri Haug
- Department of Gynecological Cancer, Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospitalet, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Oslo University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Claus Høgdall
- Department of Gynecology, Juliane Marie Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jacob Korach
- Sheba Medical Center, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Heini Lassus
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Kristina Lindemann
- Department of Gynecological Cancer, Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospitalet, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Oslo University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Els Van Nieuwenhuysen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Stephan Polterauer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hoeijmakers YM, Simons M, Bulten J, Gorris MAJ, Ottevanger PB, de Vries IJM, Sweep FCGJ. PD-L1 in gestational trophoblastic disease: an antibody evaluation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2022; 101:1007-1016. [PMID: 35689468 DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2022] [Revised: 04/19/2022] [Accepted: 05/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Treatment with antibodies directed against programmed-cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) is a novel therapy for patients with gestational trophoblastic disease. Assessment of PD-L1 expression in tumor tissue is commonly used to identify patients who might benefit from anti-PD-L1 treatment. Multiple antibodies are available to detect PD-L1-expressing cells, and percentages of PD-L1-expressing cells in samples of patients with gestational trophoblastic disease indicated by these antibodies differ substantially. This raises the question which PD-L1 antibody best reflects PD-L1 expression to select patients for treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS Seven commercially available antibodies for PD-L1 staining (E1L3N, 73-10, 22C3, CAL10, SP142, 28-8, SP263) were validated on Chinese hamster ovarian (CHO) cells transfected with PD-L1, PD-L2, wildtype CHO cells and tonsil tissue. Next, four complete hydatidiform moles and four choriocarcinomas were stained. Samples were independently assessed by two pathologists. RESULTS All seven antibodies showed membranous staining in the PD-L1-transfected CHO cells. E1L3N and 22C3 scored the highest percentages of PD-L1-positive cells (70%-90% and 60%-70%, respectively). E1L3N stained the cytoplasm of non-transfected CHO cells and was excluded from analysis. The remaining six antibodies predominantly stained syncytiotrophoblast cells of both complete hydatidiform moles and choriocarcinomas. The percentage of PD-L1-stained trophoblast cells and staining intensity varied substantially per used PD-L1 antibody and between complete hydatidiform moles and choriocarcinomas. Agreement between pathologists was best with 22C3 (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.94-0.96). CONCLUSIONS Based on staining results of the CHO cells, gestational trophoblastic disease samples and intraclass correlation coefficient, 22C3 seems the most suitable for adequate detection of PD-L1-expressing trophoblast cells. All antibodies detected PD-L1-expressing cells in the gestational trophoblastic disease samples, though with great variability, hampering comparison of results between studies in this rare disease and emphasizing the need for uniformity in detecting PD-L1-expressing cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yvonne M Hoeijmakers
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Laboratory Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel Simons
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Johan Bulten
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Mark A J Gorris
- Department of Tumor Immunology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Petronella B Ottevanger
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - I Jolanda M de Vries
- Department of Tumor Immunology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Fred C G J Sweep
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Creemers JHA, Pawlitzky I, Grosios K, Gileadi U, Middleton MR, Gerritsen WR, Mehra N, Rivoltini L, Walters I, Figdor CG, Ottevanger PB, de Vries IJM. Assessing the safety, tolerability and efficacy of PLGA-based immunomodulatory nanoparticles in patients with advanced NY-ESO-1-positive cancers: a first-in-human phase I open-label dose-escalation study protocol. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e050725. [PMID: 34848513 PMCID: PMC8634237 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The undiminished need for more effective cancer treatments stimulates the development of novel cancer immunotherapy candidates. The archetypical cancer immunotherapy would induce robust, targeted and long-lasting immune responses while simultaneously circumventing immunosuppression in the tumour microenvironment. For this purpose, we developed a novel immunomodulatory nanomedicine: PRECIOUS-01. As a PLGA-based nanocarrier, PRECIOUS-01 encapsulates a tumour antigen (NY-ESO-1) and an invariant natural killer T cell activator to target and augment specific antitumour immune responses in patients with NY-ESO-1-expressing advanced cancers. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This open-label, first-in-human, phase I dose-escalation trial investigates the safety, tolerability and immune-modulatory activity of increasing doses of PRECIOUS-01 administered intravenously in subjects with advanced NY-ESO-1-expressing solid tumours. A total of 15 subjects will receive three intravenous infusions of PRECIOUS-01 at a 3-weekly interval in three dose-finding cohorts. The trial follows a 3+3 design for the dose-escalation steps to establish a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Depending on the toxicity, the two highest dosing cohorts will be extended to delineate the immune-related parameters as a readout for pharmacodynamics. Subjects will be monitored for safety and the occurrence of dose-limiting toxicities. If the MTD is not reached in the planned dose-escalation cohorts, the RP2D will be based on the observed safety and immune-modulatory activity as a pharmacodynamic parameter supporting the RP2D. The preliminary efficacy will be evaluated as an exploratory endpoint using the best overall response rate, according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors V.1.1. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The Dutch competent authority (CCMO) reviewed the trial application and the medical research ethics committee (CMO Arnhem-Nijmegen) approved the trial under registration number NL72876.000.20. The results will be disseminated via (inter)national conferences and submitted for publication to a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04751786.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeroen H A Creemers
- Department of Tumor Immunology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Uzi Gileadi
- MRC Human Immunology Unit, Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - Mark R Middleton
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| | | | - Niven Mehra
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Licia Rivoltini
- Department of Experimental Oncology and Molecular Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Lombardia, Italy
| | | | - Carl G Figdor
- Department of Tumor Immunology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Blok LJ, Frijstein MM, Eysbouts YK, Custers JA, Sweep FC, Lok CA, Ottevanger PB. Authors' response re: The psychological impact of gestational trophoblastic disease: a prospective observational multicentre cohort study. BJOG 2021; 129:833-834. [PMID: 34820988 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.17001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2021] [Accepted: 10/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Laura J Blok
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Minke M Frijstein
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Centre of Gynaecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Yalck K Eysbouts
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Jose Ae Custers
- Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Fred Cgj Sweep
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Christianne Ar Lok
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Centre of Gynaecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Petronella B Ottevanger
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Henselmans I, Laarhoven HW, Maarschalkerweerd P, Haes HC, Dijkgraaf MG, Sommeijer DW, Ottevanger PB, Fiebrich HB, Dohmen S, Creemers GJ, Vos FY, Smets EM. Effect of a Skills Training for Oncologists and a Patient Communication Aid on Shared Decision Making About Palliative Systemic Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Oncologist 2021. [DOI: 10.1002/onco.13984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
|
15
|
Van der Meer JMR, de Jonge PKJD, van der Waart AB, Geerlings AC, Moonen JP, Brummelman J, de Klein J, Vermeulen MC, Maas RJA, Schaap NPM, Hoogstad-van Evert JS, Ottevanger PB, Jansen JH, Hobo W, Dolstra H. CD34 + progenitor-derived NK cell and gemcitabine combination therapy increases killing of ovarian cancer cells in NOD/SCID/IL2Rg null mice. Oncoimmunology 2021; 10:1981049. [PMID: 34616589 PMCID: PMC8489932 DOI: 10.1080/2162402x.2021.1981049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Combining natural killer (NK) cell adoptive transfer with tumor-sensitizing chemotherapy is an attractive approach against recurrent ovarian cancer (OC), as OC is sensitive to NK cell-mediated immunity. Previously, we showed that CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC)-derived NK cells can kill OC cells in vitro and inhibit OC tumor growth in mice. Here, we investigated the potential of HPC-NK cell therapy combined with chemotherapeutic gemcitabine (used in recurrent OC patients) against OC. We examined the phenotypical, functional, and cytotoxic effects of gemcitabine on HPC-NK cells and/or OC cells in vitro and in OC-bearing mice. To this end, we treated OC cells and/or HPC-NK cells with or without gemcitabine and analyzed the phenotype, cytokine production, and anti-tumor reactivity. We found that gemcitabine did not affect the phenotype and functionality of HPC-NK cells, while on OC cells expression of NK cell activating ligands and death receptors was upregulated. Although gemcitabine pre-treatment of OC cells did not improve the functionality of HPC-NK cells, importantly, HPC-NK cells and gemcitabine additively killed OC cells in vitro. Similarly, combined HPC-NK cell and gemcitabine treatment additively decreased tumor growth in OC-bearing mice. Collectively, our results indicate that combination therapy of HPC-NK cells and gemcitabine results in augmented OC killing in vitro and in vivo. This provides a rationale for exploring this therapeutic strategy in patients with recurrent OC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jolien M R Van der Meer
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory of Hematology, Radboud University Medical Center/Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Paul K J D de Jonge
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory of Hematology, Radboud University Medical Center/Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Anniek B van der Waart
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory of Hematology, Radboud University Medical Center/Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Alexander C Geerlings
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory of Hematology, Radboud University Medical Center/Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jurgen P Moonen
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory of Hematology, Radboud University Medical Center/Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jolanda Brummelman
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory of Hematology, Radboud University Medical Center/Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Janne de Klein
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory of Hematology, Radboud University Medical Center/Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Malou C Vermeulen
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory of Hematology, Radboud University Medical Center/Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Ralph J A Maas
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory of Hematology, Radboud University Medical Center/Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Nicolaas P M Schaap
- Department of Hematology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Janneke S Hoogstad-van Evert
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory of Hematology, Radboud University Medical Center/Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amphia Hospital, The Netherlands
| | - Petronella B Ottevanger
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Joop H Jansen
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory of Hematology, Radboud University Medical Center/Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Willemijn Hobo
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory of Hematology, Radboud University Medical Center/Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Harry Dolstra
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory of Hematology, Radboud University Medical Center/Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hoeijmakers YM, Eysbouts YK, Massuger LFAG, Dandis R, Inthout J, van Trommel NE, Ottevanger PB, Thomas CMG, Sweep FCGJ. Early prediction of post-molar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia and resistance to methotrexate, based on a single serum human chorionic gonadotropin measurement. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 163:531-537. [PMID: 34602288 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.09.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2021] [Revised: 09/11/2021] [Accepted: 09/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinicians are unable to provide individualized counseling regarding risk of progression for patients with a complete hydatidiform mole (CHM). We developed nomograms enabling early prediction of post-molar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) and resistance to methotrexate (MTX) based on a single serum human chorion gonadotropin (hCG) measurement. METHODS We generated two nomograms with logistic regression: to predict post-molar GTN, and MTX resistance. For patients with high probability to progress to post-molar GTN or MTX resistance, we determined hCG cut-offs at 97.5% specificity to select patients for additional- or adjustments in current treatment. RESULTS The nomograms had a good to excellent ability to distinguish either between patients with uneventful hCG regression versus progression to post molar GTN, or between patients cured by MTX versus patients in whom resistance would occur. At 97.5% specificity, we identified 66% (95%CI 56-75) of the 149 patients who would progress to post-molar GTN, four weeks after initial curettage. For patients treated with MTX, we identified 55% (95%CI 23-83) of the 43 patients who would become resistant, preceding their third course at 97.5% specificity. CONCLUSION The nomograms and cut-off levels can be used to assist in counseling for patients diagnosed with CHM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yvonne M Hoeijmakers
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
| | - Yalck K Eysbouts
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | | | - Rana Dandis
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Joanna Inthout
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - N E van Trommel
- Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, location Antoni van Leeuwenhoek- the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Chris M G Thomas
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Fred C G J Sweep
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Blok LJ, Frijstein MM, Eysbouts YK, Custers J, Sweep F, Lok C, Ottevanger PB. The psychological impact of gestational trophoblastic disease: a prospective observational multicentre cohort study. BJOG 2021; 129:444-449. [PMID: 34314567 PMCID: PMC9292450 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the short-term psychological consequences of gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD). DESIGN A prospective observational multicentre cohort study. SETTING Nationwide in the Netherlands. POPULATION GTD patients. METHODS Online questionnaires directly after diagnosis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Distress Thermometer (DT), Impact of Event Scale (IES) and Reproductive Concerns Scale (RCS). RESULTS Sixty GTD patients were included between 2017 and 2020. Anxious feelings (47%) were more commonly expressed than depressive feelings (27%). Patients experienced moderate to severe adaptation problems in 88%. Patients who already had children were less concerned about their reproductivity than were patients without children (mean score 10.4 versus 15.0, P = 0.031), and patients with children experienced lower distress levels (IES mean score 25.7 versus 34.7, P = 0.020). In addition, patients with previous pregnancy loss scored lower for distress compared with patients without pregnancy loss (IES mean score 21.1 versus 34.2, P = 0.002). DISCUSSION We recommend that physicians monitor physical complaints and the course of psychological wellbeing over time in order to provide personalised supportive care in time for patients who have high levels of distress at baseline. CONCLUSIONS GTD patients experience increased levels of distress, anxiety and depression, suggesting the diagnosis has a substantial effect on the psychological wellbeing of patients. The impact of GTD diagnosis on intrusion and avoidance seems to be ameliorated in patients who have children or who have experienced previous pregnancy loss. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT Patients with gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD) experience short-term psychological consequences such as distress, anxiety and depression, suggesting that the diagnosis GTD has a substantial effect on the psychological wellbeing of patients. Various patient characteristics affect the impact of GTD diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L J Blok
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - M M Frijstein
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Centre of Gynaecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Y K Eysbouts
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jae Custers
- Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Fcgj Sweep
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Car Lok
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Centre of Gynaecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P B Ottevanger
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Melief CJM, Welters MJP, Vergote I, Kroep JR, Kenter GG, Ottevanger PB, Tjalma WAA, Denys H, van Poelgeest MIE, Nijman HW, Reyners AKL, Velu T, Goffin F, Lalisang RI, Loof NM, Boekestijn S, Krebber WJ, Hooftman L, Visscher S, Blumenstein BA, Stead RB, Gerritsen W, van der Burg SH. Strong vaccine responses during chemotherapy are associated with prolonged cancer survival. Sci Transl Med 2021; 12:12/535/eaaz8235. [PMID: 32188726 DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaz8235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2019] [Accepted: 02/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Therapeutic cancer vaccines have effectively induced durable regressions of premalignant oncogenic human papilloma virus type 16 (HPV16)-induced anogenital lesions. However, the treatment of HPV16-induced cancers requires appropriate countermeasures to overcome cancer-induced immune suppression. We previously showed that standard-of-care carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy can reduce abnormally high numbers of immunosuppressive myeloid cells in patients, allowing the development of much stronger therapeutic HPV16 vaccine (ISA101)-induced tumor immunity. We now show the clinical effects of ISA101 vaccination during chemotherapy in 77 patients with advanced, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer in a dose assessment study of ISA101. Tumor regressions were observed in 43% of 72 evaluable patients. The depletion of myeloid suppressive cells by carboplatin/paclitaxel was associated with detection of low frequency of spontaneous HPV16-specific immunity in 21 of 62 tested patients. Patients mounted type 1 T cell responses to the vaccine across all doses. The group of patients with higher than median vaccine-induced immune responses lived longer, with a flat tail on the survival curve. This demonstrates that chemoimmunotherapy can be exploited to the benefit of patients with advanced cancer based on a defined mode of action.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cornelis J M Melief
- ISA Pharmaceuticals, J.H. Oortweg 19, 2333 CH Leiden, Netherlands. .,Department of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Marij J P Welters
- Oncode Institute, Jaarbeursplein 6, 3521 AL Utrecht, Netherlands.,Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospital, Leuven Cancer Institute, UZ Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Judith R Kroep
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Gemma G Kenter
- Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Petronella B Ottevanger
- Department of Medical Oncology, Nijmegen University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Wiebren A A Tjalma
- Multidisciplinary Breast Clinic-Unit Gynecological Oncology, Antwerp University Hospital, Wilrijkstraat 10, 2650 Edegem, Belgium
| | - Hannelore Denys
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Gent, Belgium
| | | | - Hans W Nijman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Anna K L Reyners
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Thierry Velu
- Chirec Cancer Institute, Medical Centre Edith Cavell, Rue Edith Cavell 32, 1180 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Frederic Goffin
- Chirec Cancer Institute, Medical Centre Edith Cavell, Rue Edith Cavell 32, 1180 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Roy I Lalisang
- Department of Medical Oncology, GROW School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Nikki M Loof
- Oncode Institute, Jaarbeursplein 6, 3521 AL Utrecht, Netherlands.,Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Sanne Boekestijn
- Oncode Institute, Jaarbeursplein 6, 3521 AL Utrecht, Netherlands.,Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, Netherlands
| | | | - Leon Hooftman
- ISA Pharmaceuticals, J.H. Oortweg 19, 2333 CH Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Sonja Visscher
- ISA Pharmaceuticals, J.H. Oortweg 19, 2333 CH Leiden, Netherlands
| | | | - Richard B Stead
- BioPharma Consulting Services, 691 96th Avenue Southeast, Bellevue, WA 98004, USA
| | - Winald Gerritsen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Nijmegen University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd H van der Burg
- Oncode Institute, Jaarbeursplein 6, 3521 AL Utrecht, Netherlands. .,Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
van Gerwen M, Maggen C, Cardonick E, Verwaaijen EJ, van den Heuvel-Eibrink M, Shmakov RG, Boere I, Gziri MM, Ottevanger PB, Lok CAR, Halaska M, Shao LT, Struys I, van Dijk-Lokkart EM, Van Calsteren K, Fruscio R, Zola P, Scarfone G, Amant F. Association of Chemotherapy Timing in Pregnancy With Congenital Malformation. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e2113180. [PMID: 34106263 PMCID: PMC8190627 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.13180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Chemotherapy during the first trimester of pregnancy should be avoided owing to the risk of congenital malformations. However, the precise gestational age at which chemotherapy can be initiated safely remains unclear. OBJECTIVE To assess congenital malformation rates associated with gestational age at initiation of chemotherapy among pregnant women with cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This multicenter cohort study evaluated all pregnant women who received chemotherapy between 1977 and 2019 registered in the International Network on Cancer, Infertility and Pregnancy (INCIP) database. Data were analyzed from February 15 to June 2, 2020. EXPOSURES Cancer treatment with chemotherapy during pregnancy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Analysis was focused on major and minor structural malformations in offspring, defined by EUROCAT, detected during pregnancy or at birth. RESULTS A total of 755 women in the INCIP database who underwent cancer treatment with chemotherapy during pregnancy were included in analysis. The median (range) age at cancer diagnosis was 33 (14-48) years. Among offspring, the major congenital malformation rate was 3.6% (95% CI, 2.4%-5.2%), and the minor congenital malformation rate was 1.9% (95% CI, 1.0%-3.1%). Chemotherapy exposure prior to 12 weeks gestational age was associated with a high rate of major congenital malformations, at 21.7% (95% CI, 7.5%-43.7%; odds ratio, 9.24 [95% CI, 3.13-27.30]). When chemotherapy was initiated after gestational age 12 weeks, the frequency of major congenital malformations was 3.0% (95% CI, 1.9%-4.6%), which was similar to the expected rates in the general population. Minor malformations were comparable when exposure occurred before or after gestational age 12 weeks (4.3% [95% CI, 0.1%-21.9%] vs 1.8% [95% CI, 1.0-3.0]; odds ratio, 3.13 [95% CI, 0.39-25.28]). Of 29 women who received chemotherapy prior to 12 weeks gestation, 17 (58.6%) were not aware of pregnancy, and 6 (20.7%) experienced a miscarriage (3 women [10.3%]) or decided to terminate their pregnancy (3 women [10.3%]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This cohort study found that chemotherapy was associated with an increased risk of major congenital malformations only in the first 12 weeks of pregnancy. The risk of congenital malformations when chemotherapy was administered during the first trimester and the high number of incidental pregnancies during cancer treatment in the INCIP registry underscore the importance of contraceptive advice and pregnancy testing at the start of chemotherapeutic treatment in young women with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathilde van Gerwen
- Center for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek–Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Elyce Cardonick
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cooper University Health Care, Camden, New Jersey
| | | | | | - Roman G. Shmakov
- National Medical Research Centre for Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Perinatology named after Academician V.I. Kulakov, Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
| | - Ingrid Boere
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mina M. Gziri
- Department of Obstetrics, Cliniques Universitaires St Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Sint-Lambrechts-Woluwe, Belgium
| | - Petronella B. Ottevanger
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Christianne A. R. Lok
- Center for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek–Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Center for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Michael Halaska
- University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Third Medical Faculty, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Long Ting Shao
- Cooper Medical School, Rowan University, Camden, New Jersey
| | - Ilana Struys
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Elisabeth M. van Dijk-Lokkart
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry & Psychosocial Care, Emma Children’s Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Kristel Van Calsteren
- Department of Obstetrics, University Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Robert Fruscio
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, San Gerardo Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Zola
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Giovanna Scarfone
- Gynecological Oncology Unit, Fondazione Istituto Di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Frédéric Amant
- Center for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek–Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Center for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Rietveld MJA, van der Velden J, Westermann AM, van Driel WJ, Sonke GS, Witteveen PO, Ploos van Amstel FK, Massuger LFAG, Ottevanger PB. Intraperitoneal treatment for advanced ovarian cancer, the Dutch experience. What did we learn? Neth J Med 2020; 78:349-356. [PMID: 33380532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Combined administration of intravenous (iv) and intraperitoneal (ip) (iv/ip) chemotherapy is an effective adjuvant treatment option after primary debulking surgery (PDS) for advanced ovarian cancer (OC). Increased toxicityand patient burden limit its use in daily practice. OBJECTIVE To assess toxicity and survival outcomes of iv/ip chemotherapy in daily practice in the Netherlands. METHODS This retrospective cohort study included 81 women who underwent at least an optimal PDS for FIGO stage III OC followed by iv/ip chemotherapy according to the Armstrong regimen, in four hospitals in the Netherlands between January 2007 and May 2016. We collected information on surgical procedure, abdominal port implantation, toxicity, and recurrence-free and overall survival. RESULTS All participants underwent PDS, of whom 60 (74%) had their ip catheter implanted during PDS. Most frequently reported all grade toxicity was haematological n = 44 (54%). Forty-four patients (54%) completed all six cycles of iv/ip chemotherapy. The most frequent causes of discontinuation of iv/ip administration were renal dysfunction (12/37 = 32%) and catheter problems (7/37 = 19%). Median recurrence-free survival and overall survival were 24 months (range 0 - 108) and 80 months (range 4-115), respectively. Surgical outcome, completion of more than three courses of treatment and intra-abdominal localisation of recurrent disease were associated with better survival outcomes. CONCLUSION In daily practice, 54% of patients with advanced OC could complete all scheduled cycles of iv/ ip chemotherapy with acceptable morbidity and toxicity, leading to outcomes comparable with the results of published trials on iv/ip chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M J A Rietveld
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Westdorp H, Creemers JHA, van Oort IM, Mehra N, Hins-de Bree SM, Figdor CG, Witjes JA, Schreibelt G, de Vries IJM, Gerritsen WR, Ottevanger PB. High Health-Related Quality of Life During Dendritic Cell Vaccination Therapy in Patients With Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. Front Oncol 2020; 10:536700. [PMID: 33194595 PMCID: PMC7649342 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.536700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2020] [Accepted: 09/24/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Maintaining health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is highly desirable during systemic therapies for patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Patient-reported outcome measures (PROs) were studied in our phase IIa trial on cellular-based immunotherapy with dendritic cells (DC). Methods We treated 21 chemo-naive asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic patients with CRPC with maximally three cycles of DC vaccinations (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02692976). Here, we report the impact of DC vaccination on HRQoL. PROs were assessed using the EORTC-QLQ-C30, the EORTC-QLQ-PR25, Checklist Individual Strength (CIS20-R), and Beck Depression Inventory Primary Care questionnaires. Short-term and long-term vaccine-related effects on HRQoL were studied. Results Questionnaires were collected at baseline (n=20), week 6 (n=19), week 12 (n=18), week 24 (n=13), week 50 (n=8) and week 100 (n=2). No clinically relevant differences in symptom-related outcome, functioning-related outcome, and Global Health Status were observed directly after the first cycle of DC vaccinations (week 6) and at follow-up (week 12) compared to baseline. HRQoL remained high throughout the vaccination cycle and six weeks afterward. In radiographic non-progressive patients, who continued DC vaccination, high HRQoL scores were observed up to one and two years after study enrolment. Conclusions Patients with asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic CRPC show high HRQoL throughout DC-based immunotherapy. This is a clinically relevant finding in this older-aged patient population with advanced prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harm Westdorp
- Department of Tumor Immunology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Netherlands.,Department of Medical Oncology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Jeroen H A Creemers
- Department of Tumor Immunology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Netherlands.,Oncode Institute, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | | | - Niven Mehra
- Department of Tumor Immunology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Netherlands.,Department of Medical Oncology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Simone M Hins-de Bree
- Department of Tumor Immunology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Carl G Figdor
- Department of Tumor Immunology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Netherlands.,Oncode Institute, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | | | - Gerty Schreibelt
- Department of Tumor Immunology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - I Jolanda M de Vries
- Department of Tumor Immunology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Netherlands.,Department of Medical Oncology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Winald R Gerritsen
- Department of Tumor Immunology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Netherlands.,Department of Medical Oncology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
IJsbrandy C, Ottevanger PB, Gerritsen WR, van Harten WH, Hermens RPMG. Determinants of adherence to physical cancer rehabilitation guidelines among cancer patients and cancer centers: a cross-sectional observational study. J Cancer Surviv 2020; 15:163-177. [PMID: 32986232 PMCID: PMC7822788 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-020-00921-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2019] [Accepted: 07/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To tailor implementation strategies that maximize adherence to physical cancer rehabilitation (PCR) guidelines, greater knowledge concerning determinants of adherence to those guidelines is needed. To this end, we assessed the determinants of adherence to PCR guidelines in the patient and cancer center. METHODS We investigated adherence variation of PCR guideline-based indicators regarding [1] screening with the Distress Thermometer (DT), [2] information provision concerning physical activity (PA) and physical cancer rehabilitation programs (PCRPs), [3] advice to take part in PA and PCRPs, [4] referral to PCRPs, [5] participation in PCRPs, and [6] PA uptake (PAU) in nine cancer centers. Furthermore, we assessed patient and cancer center characteristics as possible determinants of adherence. Regression analyses were used to determine associations between guideline adherence and patient and cancer center characteristics. In these analyses, we assumed the patient (level 1) nested within the cancer center (level 2). RESULTS Nine hundred and ninety-nine patients diagnosed with cancer between January 2014 and June 2015 were included. Of the 999 patients included in the study, 468 (47%) received screening with the DT and 427 (44%) received information provision concerning PA and PCRPs. Subsequently, 550 (56%) patients were advised to take part in PA and PCRPs, which resulted in 174 (18%) official referrals. Ultimately, 280 (29%) patients participated in PCRPs, and 446 (45%) started PAU. Screening with the DT was significantly associated with information provision concerning PA and PCRPs (OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.47-2.71), advice to take part in PA and PCRPs (OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.31-2.45), referral to PCRPs (OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.18-2.78), participation in PCRPs (OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.43-2.91), and PAU (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.25-2.29). Younger age, male gender, breast cancer as the tumor type, ≥2 cancer treatments, post-cancer treatment weight gain/loss, employment, and fatigue were determinants of guideline adherence. Less variation in scores of the indicators between the different cancer centers was found. This variation between centers was too low to detect any association between center characteristics with the indicators. CONCLUSIONS The implementation of PCR guidelines is in need of improvement. We found determinants at the patient level associated with guideline-based PCR care. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Implementation strategies that deal with the determinants of adherence to PCR guidelines might improve the implementation of PCR guidelines and the quality of life of cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte IJsbrandy
- Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ Healthcare), Radboud Institute for Health Science (RIHS), Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, PO Box 9101, Nijmegen, 6500, HB, The Netherlands. .,Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud Institute for Health Science (RIHS), Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. .,Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud Institute for Health Science (RIHS), Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Petronella B Ottevanger
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud Institute for Health Science (RIHS), Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Winald R Gerritsen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud Institute for Health Science (RIHS), Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Wim H van Harten
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Health Technology and Services Research, MB-HTSR, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Rosella P M G Hermens
- Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ Healthcare), Radboud Institute for Health Science (RIHS), Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, PO Box 9101, Nijmegen, 6500, HB, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Maggen C, Dierickx D, Cardonick E, Mhallem Gziri M, Cabrera-Garcia A, Shmakov RG, Avivi I, Masturzo B, Duvekot JJ, Ottevanger PB, O'Laughlin A, Polushkina E, Van Calsteren K, Woei-A-Jin FJSH, Amant F. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in 80 patients diagnosed with non-Hodgkin lymphoma during pregnancy: results from the International Network of Cancer, Infertility and Pregnancy. Br J Haematol 2020; 193:52-62. [PMID: 32945547 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.17103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2020] [Revised: 08/14/2020] [Accepted: 08/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
This cohort study of the International Network on Cancer, Infertility and Pregnancy (INCIP) reports the maternal and neonatal outcomes of 80 pregnant patients diagnosed with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) between 1986 and 2019, focussing on 57 (71%) patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Of all 80 patients, 54 (68%) pregnant patients received chemotherapy; mostly (89%) CHOP-like (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) regimens. Four early pregnancies were terminated. Among 76 ongoing pregnancies, there was one stillbirth (1·3%). Overall, there was a high incidence of small for gestational age neonates (39%), preterm delivery (52%), obstetric (41%) and neonatal complications (12·5%), and this could not exclusively be explained by the receipt of antenatal chemotherapy. Half of preterm deliveries (46%) were planned in order to tailor oncological treatment. The 3-year progression-free and overall survival for patients with DLBCL treated with rituximab-CHOP was 83·4% and 95·7% for limited stage (n = 29) and 60·6% and 73·3% for advanced stage (n = 15). Of 36 pregnant patients who received rituximab, five (13%) cases with neonatal complications and three (8%) with maternal infections were reported. In conclusion, standard treatment for DLBCL can be offered to pregnant patients in obstetric centres that cater for high-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Daan Dierickx
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Haematology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Elyce Cardonick
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Cooper, University Health Care, Camden, NJ, USA
| | - Mina Mhallem Gziri
- Department of Obstetrics, Cliniques Universitaires St Luc, UCL, Sint-Lambrechts-Woluwe, Belgium
| | - Alvaro Cabrera-Garcia
- Hospital Regional de Alta Especialidad de Ixtapaluca (HRAEI) "Reference clinic for haemato-oncological diseases during pregnancy CREHER", Estado de México, México
| | - Roman G Shmakov
- National Medical Research Centre for Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Perinatology named after Academician V.I. Kulakov of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
| | - Irit Avivi
- Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Centre, Tel Aviv, Israel.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, TA University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Bianca Masturzo
- Department Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Johannes J Duvekot
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Petronella B Ottevanger
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | | | - Evgeniya Polushkina
- National Medical Research Centre for Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Perinatology named after Academician V.I. Kulakov of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
| | - Kristel Van Calsteren
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Development and regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - F J Sherida H Woei-A-Jin
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of General Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Frédéric Amant
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Gynaecology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek - Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Vandenbroucke T, Verheecke M, van Gerwen M, Van Calsteren K, Halaska MJ, Fumagalli M, Fruscio R, Gandhi A, Veening M, Lagae L, Ottevanger PB, Voigt JU, de Haan J, Gziri MM, Maggen C, Mertens L, Naulaers G, Claes L, Amant F. Child development at 6 years after maternal cancer diagnosis and treatment during pregnancy. Eur J Cancer 2020; 138:57-67. [PMID: 32858478 PMCID: PMC7532701 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2020] [Revised: 06/15/2020] [Accepted: 07/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Background Data on the long-term effects of prenatal exposure to maternal cancer and its treatment on child development are scarce. Methods In a multicenter cohort study, the neurologic and cardiac outcomes of 6-year-old children born to women diagnosed with cancer during pregnancy were compared with the outcome of children born after an uncomplicated pregnancy. Assessment included clinical evaluation, comprehensive neuropsychological testing, electrocardiography and echocardiography. Results In total, 132 study children and 132 controls were included. In the study group, 97 children (73.5%) were prenatally exposed to chemotherapy (alone or in combination with other treatments), 14 (10.6%) to radiotherapy (alone or in combination), 1 (0.8%) to trastuzumab, 12 (9.1%) to surgery alone and 16 (12.1%) to no treatment. Although within normal ranges, statistically significant differences were found in mean verbal IQ and visuospatial long-term memory, with lower scores in the study versus control group (98.1, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 94.5–101.8, versus 104.4, 95% CI: 100.4–108.4, P = 0.001, Q < 0.001 [Q refers to the false discovery rate adjusted P value], and 3.9, 95% CI: 3.6–4.3, versus 4.5, 95% CI: 4.1–4.9, P = 0.005, Q = 0.045, respectively). A significant difference in diastolic blood pressure was found, with higher values in chemotherapy-exposed (61.1, 95% CI: 59.0 to 63.2) versus control children (56.0, 95% CI 54.1 to 57.8) (P < 0.001, Q < 0.001) and in a subgroup of 59 anthracycline-exposed (61.8, 95% CI: 59.3 to 64.4) versus control children (55.9, 95% CI: 53.6 to 58.1) (P < 0.001, Q = 0.02). Conclusions Children prenatally exposed to maternal cancer and its treatment are at risk for lower verbal IQ and visuospatial long-term memory scores and for higher diastolic blood pressure, but other cognitive functions and cardiac outcomes were normal at the age of 6 years. Clinical trial registration The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00330447. Cancer treatment including chemotherapy is possible during pregnancy. Children are at risk for lower verbal IQ and visuospatial long-term memory scores. Other cognitive functions and cardiac outcomes were normal at the age of 6 years. We documented ototoxicity in three children exposed to cisplatin. Follow-up until adulthood is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tineke Vandenbroucke
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Magali Verheecke
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Mathilde van Gerwen
- Center for Gynecologic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Kristel Van Calsteren
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Michael J Halaska
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 3rd Medical Faculty Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Faculty Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Monica Fumagalli
- Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy; Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Robert Fruscio
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Milan-Bicocca and San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - Amarendra Gandhi
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Data Scientist, Knowledge Center, SD Worx, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Margreet Veening
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Lieven Lagae
- Department of Pediatrics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Jens-Uwe Voigt
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jorine de Haan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amsterdam UMC, Location VU University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - Mina M Gziri
- Department of Obstetrics, Cliniques Universitaires St Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Charlotte Maggen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Luc Mertens
- Department of Cardiology, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Gunnar Naulaers
- Department of Neonatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Laurence Claes
- Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Frédéric Amant
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Center for Gynecologic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Amsterdam Medical Center and University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
van Weelden WJ, Reijnen C, Eggink FA, Boll D, Ottevanger PB, van den Berg HA, van der Aa MA, Pijnenborg JMA. Impact of different adjuvant treatment approaches on survival in stage III endometrial cancer: A population-based study. Eur J Cancer 2020; 133:104-111. [PMID: 32454416 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.04.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2020] [Revised: 04/07/2020] [Accepted: 04/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage III endometrial cancer (EC) have a substantial risk of adverse outcomes. After surgery, adjuvant therapy is recommended with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), chemotherapy (CT) or both EBRT and CT. Recent trials suggest that EBRT + CT is superior to EBRT or CT alone but also results in more toxicity. We have compared the outcome of different adjuvant treatments in a population-based cohort to identify subgroups that benefit most from EBRT + CT. METHODS All patients diagnosed with FIGO stage III EC and treated with surgery in 2005-2016 were identified from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS); associations with adjuvant treatment were analysed using Cox regression analysis. RESULTS Among 1241 eligible patients, EBRT + CT was associated with a better OS than CT (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.34-2.52) and EBRT alone (HR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.05-1.79). In stage IIIC, there was a significant benefit of EBRT + CT compared with CT or EBRT alone. In stage IIIA-B, there was no difference between EBRT + CT or EBRT alone. In endometrioid EC (EEC) and carcinosarcomas, EBRT + CT was associated with a better OS than CT or EBRT alone. For uterine serous cancers, there was no survival benefit of EBRT + CT over CT. In all analysis by stage and histology, any adjuvant treatment was superior to no adjuvant therapy. CONCLUSIONS In this population-based study, adjuvant EBRT + CT was associated with improved OS compared with CT or EBRT alone in FIGO stage IIIC EC, EEC and carcinosarcoma. This suggests that application of EBRT + CT in stage III should be further stratified according to these subgroups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Willem Jan van Weelden
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Casper Reijnen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Canisius Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Florine A Eggink
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Dorry Boll
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Petronella B Ottevanger
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Maaike A van der Aa
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Johanna M A Pijnenborg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Zusterzeel PL, Aarts JW, Pol FJ, Ottevanger PB, van Ham MA. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Vaginal Radical Trachelectomy as Fertility-Preserving Treatment for Patients with FIGO 2018 Stage 1B2 Cervical Cancer. Oncologist 2020; 25:e1051-e1059. [PMID: 32339376 PMCID: PMC7356752 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2020-0063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2020] [Accepted: 03/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Standard treatment for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2018 stage 1B2 cervical cancer (i.e., tumor size between 2 and 4 cm) is a radical hysterectomy (RH) with pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND). We evaluated the oncological and fertility outcomes treatment in patients receiving a fertility-sparing alternative consisting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by vaginal radical trachelectomy (VRT). METHODS Patients with stage 1B2 cervical cancer who wished to preserve fertility were included from September 2009 to September 2018. NACT consisted of 6-week cycles of cisplatin or carboplatin with paclitaxel. If tumor size decreased to 2 cm or smaller, NACT was followed by a robot-assisted PLND and VRT. RESULTS Eighteen patients were included. Median follow-up time was 49.7 months (range 11.4-110.8). Median tumor size was 32 mm (range 22-40 mm). Complete remission after NACT occurred in seven women. Four women had a poor response on NACT. Three underwent RH with PLND; one received chemoradiation after PLND instead of VRT because of positive lymph nodes. The remaining 14 patients received VRT 3-4 weeks after NACT. Four recurrences occurred: three after NACT and VRT and one after NACT and RH. Median time to recurrence was 20.8 months (range 17.0-105.7). Three recurrences occurred in women with adenocarcinoma with lymph vascular space invasion (LVSI). In four women fertility could not be preserved. To date, four women had six pregnancies, including three live births born at term, two first trimester miscarriages, and one currently ongoing pregnancy. CONCLUSION NACT and VRT in women with stage 1B2 cervical cancer showed promising results. In 78% fertility was preserved. However, patients with poor response on NACT and with adenocarcinoma and/or LVSI were possibly at risk for recurrence. Long-term results in relation to fertility and oncological outcome are needed to corroborate these findings. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Standard treatment for women with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2018 stage 1B2 cervical cancer (tumor size 2-4 cm) is a radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND). However, many of these women are young and wish to preserve fertility. Data on fertility-sparing treatment options are sparse, but neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by a vaginal radical trachelectomy and PLND could be an alternative. Since 2009 we performed an observational cohort study in which 18 women opted for this treatment in our center. In 14 women fertility could be preserved. In four patients the tumor recurred. In four women six pregnancies occurred. After careful selection this treatment could be a good fertility-sparing treatment option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petra L.M. Zusterzeel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical CenterNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Johanna W.M. Aarts
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical CenterNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Fraukje J.M. Pol
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical CenterNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | | | - Maaike A.P.C. van Ham
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical CenterNijmegenThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Hoeijmakers YM, Sweep F, Lok C, Ottevanger PB. Risk factors for second-line dactinomycin failure after methotrexate treatment for low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: a retrospective study. BJOG 2020; 127:1139-1145. [PMID: 32141676 PMCID: PMC7383780 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To find risk factors for second-line dactinomycin failure in patients with low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN). DESIGN Retrospective multicentre study. SETTING Tertiary reference centre. POPULATION Patients with low-risk GTN, treated with dactinomycin after methotrexate (MTX) failure. METHODS Retrospective analysis of 45 patients with low-risk GTN treated with dactinomycin after MTX failure, registered between 2006 and 2018. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Treatment outcome and risk factors for second-line dactinomycin failure. RESULTS Thirty patients (66.7%) were cured and 15 patients (33.3%) required third-line therapy. Type of antecedent pregnancy and hCG levels pre-dactinomycin were risk factors for failure in univariate analysis (odds ratio [OR] 19.30, 95% CI 2.04-182.60, P = 0.01 and OR 2.77, 95% CI 1.18-6.50, P = 0.02, respectively). Level of hCG pre-dactinomycin remained a significant risk factor in multivariate analysis (OR 2.93, 95% CI 1.02-8.40, P = 0.045). Complete remission (CR) was achieved in 83.3% of patients with pre-dactinomycin hCG levels <10 ng/ml, in 75% with hCG levels between 10 and 20 ng/ml, in 66.7% with hCG levels between 20 and 30 ng/ml, and in 50% with hCG levels between 30 and 40 ng/ml. No patients with hCG levels >40 ng/ml achieved CR. Patients with dactinomycin failure were treated surgically and/or with multi-chemotherapy; all except one achieved CR. CONCLUSIONS Treatment with dactinomycin after MTX failure in patients with low-risk GTN resulted in CR in 66.7%. Chance of curative treatment with dactinomycin is strongly related to the hCG level. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT Chance of curative treatment with dactinomycin after MTX failure in GTN patients is strongly related to the level of hCG pre-dactinomycin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y M Hoeijmakers
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Fcgj Sweep
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Car Lok
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Cancer Institute Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - P B Ottevanger
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Ploos van Amstel FK, Peters MEWJ, Donders R, Schlooz‐Vries MS, Polman LJM, Graaf WTA, Prins JB, Ottevanger PB. Does a regular nurse‐led distress screening and discussion improve quality of life of breast cancer patients treated with curative intent? A randomized controlled trial. Psychooncology 2020; 29:719-728. [DOI: 10.1002/pon.5324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2019] [Revised: 12/16/2019] [Accepted: 12/17/2019] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Rogier Donders
- Department for Health EvidenceRadboud University Medical Center Nijmegen The Netherlands
| | | | - Lenny J. M. Polman
- Department of SurgeryRadboud University Medical Center Nijmegen The Netherlands
| | - Winette T. A. Graaf
- Department of Medical OncologyRadboud University Medical Center Nijmegen The Netherlands
| | - Judith B. Prins
- Department of Medical PsychologyRadboud University Medical Center Nijmegen The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Aydemirli MD, Kapiteijn E, Ferrier KRM, Ottevanger PB, Links TP, van der Horst-Schrivers ANA, Broekman KE, Groenwold RHH, Zwaveling J. Effectiveness and toxicity of lenvatinib in refractory thyroid cancer: Dutch real-life data. Eur J Endocrinol 2020; 182:131-138. [PMID: 31751307 DOI: 10.1530/eje-19-0763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2019] [Accepted: 11/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The SELECT trial showed progression-free survival (PFS) benefit for lenvatinib for advanced radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RAI-refractory or RR-DTC) patients, on which current clinical practice is based. We assessed whether the effectiveness and toxicity of lenvatinib in real-life clinical practice in the Netherlands were comparable to the pivotal SELECT trial. METHODS From three Dutch centres Electronic Health Records (EHRs) of patients treated in the lenvatinib compassionate use program or as standard of care were reviewed and checked for SELECT eligibility criteria. Baseline characteristics, safety, and efficacy measures were compared and PFS and overall survival (OS) were calculated. Furthermore, PFS was compared to estimates of PFS reported in other studies. RESULTS A total of 39 DTC patients with a median age of 62 years were analysed. Of these, 27 patients (69%) did not fulfil the SELECT eligibility criteria. The most common grade ≥3 toxicities were hypertension (n = 11, 28%), diarrhoea (n = 7, 18%), vomiting (n = 4, 10%), and gallbladder disease (n = 3, 8%). Median PFS and median OS were 9.7 (95% confidence interval (CI): 4.0-15.5) and 18.3 (95% CI: 4.9-31.7) months, respectively, response rate was 38% (95% CI: 23-54%). PFS in the Dutch real-life situation was comparable to previous real-life studies, but inferior to PFS as shown in the SELECT trial (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS PFS in our non-trial population was significantly shorter than in the SELECT trial population. In the interpretation of results, differences in the real-life population and the SELECT study population regarding patient characteristics should be taken into account.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M D Aydemirli
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - E Kapiteijn
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - K R M Ferrier
- Department of Pharmacology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - P B Ottevanger
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - T P Links
- Department of Endocrinology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - K E Broekman
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - R H H Groenwold
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - J Zwaveling
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Paoletti X, Lewsley LA, Daniele G, Cook A, Yanaihara N, Tinker A, Kristensen G, Ottevanger PB, Aravantinos G, Miller A, Boere IA, Fruscio R, Reyners AKL, Pujade-Lauraine E, Harkin A, Pignata S, Kagimura T, Welch S, Paul J, Karamouza E, Glasspool RM. Assessment of Progression-Free Survival as a Surrogate End Point of Overall Survival in First-Line Treatment of Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3:e1918939. [PMID: 31922558 PMCID: PMC6991254 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2019] [Accepted: 10/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Importance The Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG) recommended that progression-free survival (PFS) can serve as a primary end point instead of overall survival (OS) in advanced ovarian cancer. Evidence is lacking for the validity of PFS as a surrogate marker of OS in the modern era of different treatment types. Objective To evaluate whether PFS is a surrogate end point for OS in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Data Sources In September 2016, a comprehensive search of publications in MEDLINE was conducted for randomized clinical trials of systematic treatment in patients with newly diagnosed ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer. The GCIG groups were also queried for potentially completed but unpublished trials. Study Selection Studies with a minimum sample size of 60 patients published since 2001 with PFS and OS rates available were eligible. Investigational treatments considered included initial, maintenance, and intensification therapy consisting of agents delivered at a higher dose and/or frequency compared with that in the control arm. Data Extraction and Synthesis Using the meta-analytic approach on randomized clinical trials published from January 1, 2001, through September 25, 2016, correlations between PFS and OS at the individual level were estimated using the Kendall τ model; between-treatment effects on PFS and OS at the trial level were estimated using the Plackett copula bivariate (R2) model. Criteria for PFS surrogacy required R2 ≥ 0.80 at the trial level. Analysis was performed from January 7 through March 20, 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures Overall survival and PFS based on measurement of cancer antigen 125 levels confirmed by radiological examination results or by combined GCIG criteria. Results In this meta-analysis of 17 unique randomized trials of standard (n = 7), intensification (n = 5), and maintenance (n = 5) chemotherapies or targeted treatments with data from 11 029 unique patients (median age, 58 years [range, 18-88 years]), a high correlation was found between PFS and OS at the individual level (τ = 0.724; 95% CI, 0.717-0.732), but a low correlation was found at the trial level (R2 = 0.24; 95% CI, 0-0.59). Subgroup analyses led to similar results. In the external validation, 14 of the 16 hazard ratios for OS in the published reports fell within the 95% prediction interval from PFS. Conclusions and Relevance This large meta-analysis of individual patient data did not establish PFS as a surrogate end point for OS in first-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer, but the analysis was limited by the narrow range of treatment effects observed or by poststudy treatment. These results suggest that if PFS is chosen as a primary end point, OS must be measured as a secondary end point.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xavier Paoletti
- Groupe d’investigateurs national des Etudes des Cancers Ovariens (GINECO), Paris, France
- Gustave Roussy Cancer Center and Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Medicale Oncostat, Villejuif, France
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Versailles St Quentin, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Liz-Anne Lewsley
- Scottish Gynaecological Cancer Trials Group (SGCTG), Cancer Research United Kingdom Clinical Trial Unit, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Gennaro Daniele
- Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer and Gynecologic Malignancies (MITO), Clinical Trials Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori– Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italia
| | - Adrian Cook
- Medical Research Counsel Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nozomu Yanaihara
- Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group (JGOG), Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Anna Tinker
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group (CCTG), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Gunnar Kristensen
- Nordic Society of Gynaecological Oncology, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Petronella B. Ottevanger
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Gerasimos Aravantinos
- Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group, General Oncology Hospital of Kifissia, Nea Kifissia, Greece
| | - Austin Miller
- Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG), Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | - Ingrid A. Boere
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Robert Fruscio
- University of Milan Bicocca, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - Anna K. L. Reyners
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Eric Pujade-Lauraine
- Association de Recherche sur les Cancers dont Gynécologiques–GINECO, Université Paris Descartes, Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Andrea Harkin
- Scottish Gynaecological Cancer Trials Group (SGCTG), Cancer Research United Kingdom Clinical Trial Unit, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Sandro Pignata
- MITO, Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli IRCCS Fondazione G Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Tatsuo Kagimura
- JGOG, Foundation for Biomedical Research and Innovation at Kobe, Translational Research Center for Medical Innovation, Kobe, Japan
| | - Stephen Welch
- CCTG, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - James Paul
- Scottish Gynaecological Cancer Trials Group (SGCTG), Cancer Research United Kingdom Clinical Trial Unit, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | | | - Rosalind M. Glasspool
- SGCTG, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, NHS (National Health Service) Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
IJsbrandy C, van Harten WH, Gerritsen WR, Hermens RP, Ottevanger PB. Healthcare professionals' perspectives of barriers and facilitators in implementing physical activity programmes delivered to cancer survivors in a shared-care model: a qualitative study. Support Care Cancer 2019; 28:3429-3440. [PMID: 31792881 PMCID: PMC7256088 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-019-05108-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2019] [Accepted: 09/30/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The positive impact of physical activity programmes has been recognised, but the current uptake is low. Authorities believe delivering these programmes in a shared-care model is a future perspective. The present study aimed to identify the barriers and facilitators affecting physical activity programme implementation in a shared-care model delivered with the cooperation of all the types of healthcare professionals involved. METHODS Thirty-one individual interviews with primary healthcare professionals (PHPs) and four focus group interviews with 39 secondary healthcare professionals (SHPs) were undertaken. We used Grol and Flottorp's theoretical models to identify barriers and facilitators in six domains: (1) physical activity programmes, (2) patients, (3) healthcare professionals, (4) social setting, (5) organisation and (6) law and governance. RESULTS In the domain of physical activity programmes, those physical activity programmes that were non-tailored to the patients' needs impeded successful implementation. In the domain of healthcare professionals, the knowledge and skills pertaining to physical activity programmes and non-commitment of healthcare professionals impeded implementation. HCPs expressed their concerns about the negative influence of the patient's social network. Most barriers occurred in the domain of organisation. The PHPs and SHPs raised concerns about ineffective collaboration and networks between hospitals. Only the PHPs raised concerns about poor communication, indeterminate roles, and lack of collaboration with SHPs. Insufficient and unclear insurance coverage of physical activity programmes was a barrier in the domain of law and governance. CONCLUSIONS Improving the domain of organisation seems the most challenging because the collaboration, communication, networks, and interactive roles between the PHPs and SHPs are all inadequate. Survivor care plans, more use of health information technology, improved rehabilitation guidelines, and better networks might benefit implementing physical activity programmes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte IJsbrandy
- Radboud Institute for Health Science (RIHS), Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Radboud Institute for Health Science (RIHS), Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Radboud Institute for Health Science (RIHS), Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Wim H. van Harten
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Health Technology and Services Research, University of Twente, MB-HTSR, PO Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Winald R. Gerritsen
- Radboud Institute for Health Science (RIHS), Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Rosella P.M.G. Hermens
- Radboud Institute for Health Science (RIHS), Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Petronella B. Ottevanger
- Radboud Institute for Health Science (RIHS), Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Henselmans I, van Laarhoven HW, van Maarschalkerweerd P, de Haes HC, Dijkgraaf MG, Sommeijer DW, Ottevanger PB, Fiebrich H, Dohmen S, Creemers G, de Vos FY, Smets EM. Effect of a Skills Training for Oncologists and a Patient Communication Aid on Shared Decision Making About Palliative Systemic Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Oncologist 2019; 25:e578-e588. [PMID: 32162796 PMCID: PMC7066716 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2019] [Accepted: 10/16/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Palliative systematic treatment offers uncertain and often limited benefits, and the burden can be high. Hence, treatment decisions require shared decision making (SDM). This trial examined the independent and combined effect of an oncologist training and a patient communication aid on SDM. METHODS In this multicenter randomized controlled trial with four parallel arms (2016-2018), oncologists (n = 31) were randomized to receive SDM communication skills training or not. The training consisted of a reader, two group sessions, a booster session, and a consultation room tool (10 hours). Patients (n = 194) with advanced cancer were randomized to receive a patient communication aid or not. The aid consisted of education on SDM, a question prompt list, and a value clarification exercise. The primary outcome was observed SDM as rated by blinded observers from audio-recorded consultations. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported SDM, patient and oncologist satisfaction, patients' decisional conflict, patient quality of life 3 months after consultation, consultation duration, and the decision made. RESULTS The oncologist training had a large positive effect on observed SDM (Cohen's d = 1.12) and on patient-reported SDM (d = 0.73). The patient communication aid did not improve SDM. The combination of interventions did not add to the effect of training oncologists only. The interventions affected neither patient nor oncologist satisfaction with the consultation nor patients' decisional conflict, quality of life, consultation duration, or the decision made. CONCLUSION Training medical oncologists in SDM about palliative systemic treatment improves both observed and patient-reported SDM. A patient communication aid does not. The incorporation of skills training in (continuing) educational programs for medical oncologists is likely to stimulate the widely advocated uptake of shared decision making in clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION Netherlands Trial Registry NTR 5489. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Treatment for advanced cancer offers uncertain and often small benefits, and the burden can be high. Hence, treatment decisions require shared decision making (SDM). SDM is increasingly advocated for ethical reasons and for its beneficial effect on patient outcomes. Few initiatives to stimulate SDM are evaluated in robust designs. This randomized controlled trial shows that training medical oncologists improves both observed and patient-reported SDM in clinical encounters (n = 194). A preconsultation communication aid for patients did not add to the effect of training oncologists. SDM training effectively changes oncologists' practice and should be implemented in (continuing) educational programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inge Henselmans
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Cancer Center AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Hanneke W.M. van Laarhoven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Cancer Center AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Pomme van Maarschalkerweerd
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Hanneke C.J.M. de Haes
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Marcel G.W. Dijkgraaf
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Bioinformatics, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Dirkje W. Sommeijer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Department of Medical OncologyFlevoziekenhuis, AlmereThe Netherlands
| | | | | | - Serge Dohmen
- Department of Medical OncologyBovenIJZiekenhuis, AmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Geert‐Jan Creemers
- Department of Medical OncologyCatharinaziekenhuis, EindhovenThe Netherlands
| | - Filip Y.F.L. de Vos
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Ellen M.A. Smets
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Cancer Center AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Maggen C, Dierickx D, Lugtenburg P, Laenen A, Cardonick E, Smakov RG, Bellido M, Cabrera-Garcia A, Gziri MM, Halaska MJ, Ottevanger PB, Van Calsteren K, O'Laughlin A, Polushkina E, Van Dam L, Avivi I, Vandenberghe P, Woei-A-Jin FJSH, Amant F. Obstetric and maternal outcomes in patients diagnosed with Hodgkin lymphoma during pregnancy: a multicentre, retrospective, cohort study. The Lancet Haematology 2019; 6:e551-e561. [DOI: 10.1016/s2352-3026(19)30195-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2019] [Revised: 08/04/2019] [Accepted: 08/05/2019] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
|
34
|
Maggen C, Lok CA, Cardonick E, van Gerwen M, Ottevanger PB, Boere IA, Koskas M, Halaska MJ, Fruscio R, Gziri MM, Witteveen PO, Van Calsteren K, Amant F. Gastric cancer during pregnancy: A report on 13 cases and review of the literature with focus on chemotherapy during pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2019; 99:79-88. [PMID: 31529466 PMCID: PMC6972614 DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2019] [Revised: 09/05/2019] [Accepted: 09/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Gastric cancer during pregnancy is extremely rare and data on optimal treatment and possible chemotherapeutic regimens are scarce. The aim of this study is to describe the obstetric and maternal outcome of women with gastric cancer during pregnancy and review the literature on antenatal chemotherapy for gastric cancer. Material and methods Treatment and outcome of patients registered in the International Network on Cancer, Infertility and Pregnancy database with gastric cancer diagnosed during pregnancy were analyzed. Results In total, 13 women with gastric cancer during pregnancy were registered between 2002 and 2018. Median gestational age at diagnosis was 22 weeks (range 6‐30 weeks). Twelve women were diagnosed with advanced disease and died within 2 years after pregnancy, most within 6 months. In total, eight out of 10 live births ended in a preterm delivery because of preeclampsia, maternal deterioration, or therapy planning. Two out of six women who initiated chemotherapy during pregnancy delivered at term. Two neonates prenatally exposed to chemotherapy were growth restricted and one of them developed a systemic infection with brain abscess after preterm delivery for preeclampsia 2 weeks after chemotherapy. No malformations were reported. Conclusions The prognosis of gastric cancer during pregnancy is poor, mainly due to advanced disease at diagnosis, emphasizing the need for early diagnosis. Antenatal chemotherapy can be considered to reach fetal maturity, taking possible complications such as growth restriction, preterm delivery, and hematopoietic suppression at birth into account.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Maggen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Christianne A Lok
- Center for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek - Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Elyce Cardonick
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cooper, University Health Care, Camden, NJ, USA
| | - Mathilde van Gerwen
- Center for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek - Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Petronella B Ottevanger
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Ingrid A Boere
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer, Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martin Koskas
- Gynecologic Oncology, Bichat University Hospital, Paris Diderot University, Paris, France
| | - Michael J Halaska
- Faculty Hospital Kralovske, Vinohrady and 3rd Medical Faculty, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Robert Fruscio
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Milan - Bicocca, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - Mina M Gziri
- Department of Obstetrics, Cliniques Universitaires St Luc, UCL, Sint-Lambrechts-Woluwe, Belgium
| | - Petronella O Witteveen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Utrecht Cancer Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Kristel Van Calsteren
- Department of Obstetrics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven and Department of Development and regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Frédéric Amant
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Center for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek - Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Center for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Ray-Coquard I, Cibula D, Mirza MR, Reuss A, Ricci C, Colombo N, Koch H, Goffin F, González-Martin A, Ottevanger PB, Baumann K, Bjørge L, Lesoin A, Burges A, Rosenberg P, Gropp-Meier M, Harrela M, Harter P, Frenel JS, Minarik T, Pisano C, Hasenburg A, Merger M, du Bois A. Final results from GCIG/ENGOT/AGO-OVAR 12, a randomised placebo-controlled phase III trial of nintedanib combined with chemotherapy for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer. Int J Cancer 2019; 146:439-448. [PMID: 31381147 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2019] [Revised: 06/10/2019] [Accepted: 06/24/2019] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
AGO-OVAR 12 investigated the effect of adding the oral triple angiokinase inhibitor nintedanib to standard front-line chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer. At the primary analysis, nintedanib demonstrated significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS; primary endpoint) compared with placebo. We report final results, including overall survival (OS). Patients with primary debulked International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIB-IV newly diagnosed ovarian cancer were randomised 2:1 to receive carboplatin (area under the curve 5 or 6) plus paclitaxel (175 mg/m2 ) on day 1 every 3 weeks for six cycles combined with either nintedanib 200 mg or placebo twice daily on days 2-21 every 3 weeks for up to 120 weeks. Between December 2009 and July 2011, 1,366 patients were randomised (911 to nintedanib, 455 to placebo). Disease was considered as high risk (FIGO stage III with >1 cm residuum, or any stage IV) in 39%. At the final analysis, 605 patients (44%) had died. There was no difference in OS (hazard ratio 0.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.83-1.17, p = 0.86; median 62.0 months with nintedanib vs. 62.8 months with placebo). Subgroup analyses according to stratification factors, clinical characteristics and risk status showed no OS difference between treatments. The previously reported PFS improvement seen with nintedanib did not translate into an OS benefit in the nonhigh-risk subgroup. Updated PFS results were consistent with the primary analysis (hazard ratio 0.86, 95% CI 0.75-0.98; p = 0.029) favouring nintedanib. The safety profile was consistent with previous reports.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabelle Ray-Coquard
- GINECO and Medical Oncology Department, Centre Léon Bérard, University Claude Bernard Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - David Cibula
- AGO and Oncogynecologic Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Faculty Hospital, Charles University of Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Mansoor R Mirza
- NSGO and Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Alexander Reuss
- AGO and Coordinating Center for Clinical Trials, Philipps-University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Caterina Ricci
- MITO and Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Women and Children's Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Nicoletta Colombo
- MaNGO and European Institute of Oncology and University of Milan Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Horst Koch
- AGO Austria and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | | | | | - Petronella B Ottevanger
- DGOG and Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Klaus Baumann
- AGO and Department of Gynecology, Klinikum der Stadt Ludwigshafen GmbH, Ludwigshafen, Germany
| | - Line Bjørge
- NSGO and Department of Gynecology, Haukeland Universitetssykehus, Bergen, Norway.,Center for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Anne Lesoin
- GINECO and Department of Gynecologic Cancer and Medical Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - Alexander Burges
- AGO and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany
| | - Per Rosenberg
- NSGO and Department of Oncology, University Hospital Linköping, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Martina Gropp-Meier
- AGO and Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Oberschwabenklinik, Krankenhaus St. Elisabeth, Ravensburg, Germany
| | - Maija Harrela
- NSGO and Department of Gynoncology and Gynecology and Obstetrics, Kymenlaakso Central Hospital, Kotka, Finland
| | - Philipp Harter
- AGO and Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Jean-Sébastien Frenel
- GINECO and Centre René Gauducheau, Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France
| | - Tomas Minarik
- NSGO and National Institute of Oncology, Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - Carmela Pisano
- MITO and Department of Uro-Gynecologic Oncology, Istituto Nazionale per Io Studio e la Cura dei Tumori 'Fondazione G. Pascale' IRCCS, Naples, Italy
| | - Annette Hasenburg
- AGO and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - Michael Merger
- Oncology Medicine, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Biberach, Germany
| | - Andreas du Bois
- AGO and Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
de Boer SM, Powell ME, Mileshkin L, Katsaros D, Bessette P, Haie-Meder C, Ottevanger PB, Ledermann JA, Khaw P, D'Amico R, Fyles A, Baron MH, Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM, Kitchener HC, Nijman HW, Wilson G, Brooks S, Gribaudo S, Provencher D, Hanzen C, Kruitwagen RF, Smit VTHBM, Singh N, Do V, Lissoni A, Nout RA, Feeney A, Verhoeven-Adema KW, Putter H, Creutzberg CL. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in women with high-risk endometrial cancer (PORTEC-3): patterns of recurrence and post-hoc survival analysis of a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2019; 20:1273-1285. [PMID: 31345626 PMCID: PMC6722042 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30395-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 256] [Impact Index Per Article: 51.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2019] [Revised: 05/13/2019] [Accepted: 05/14/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The PORTEC-3 trial investigated the benefit of combined adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy versus pelvic radiotherapy alone for women with high-risk endometrial cancer. We updated the analysis to investigate patterns of recurrence and did a post-hoc survival analysis. METHODS In the multicentre randomised phase 3 PORTEC-3 trial, women with high-risk endometrial cancer were eligible if they had International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 stage I, endometrioid grade 3 cancer with deep myometrial invasion or lymphovascular space invasion, or both; stage II or III disease; or stage I-III disease with serous or clear cell histology; were aged 18 years and older; and had a WHO performance status of 0-2. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive radiotherapy alone (48·6 Gy in 1·8 Gy fractions given on 5 days per week) or chemoradiotherapy (two cycles of cisplatin 50 mg/m2 given intravenously during radiotherapy, followed by four cycles of carboplatin AUC5 and paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 given intravenously), by use of a biased coin minimisation procedure with stratification for participating centre, lymphadenectomy, stage, and histological type. The co-primary endpoints were overall survival and failure-free survival. Secondary endpoints of vaginal, pelvic, and distant recurrence were analysed according to the first site of recurrence. Survival endpoints were analysed by intention-to-treat, and adjusted for stratification factors. Competing risk methods were used for failure-free survival and recurrence. We did a post-hoc analysis to analyse patterns of recurrence with 1 additional year of follow-up. The study was closed on Dec 20, 2013; follow-up is ongoing. This study is registered with ISRCTN, number ISRCTN14387080, and ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00411138. FINDINGS Between Nov 23, 2006, and Dec 20, 2013, 686 women were enrolled, of whom 660 were eligible and evaluable (330 in the chemoradiotherapy group, and 330 in the radiotherapy-alone group). At a median follow-up of 72·6 months (IQR 59·9-85·6), 5-year overall survival was 81·4% (95% CI 77·2-85·8) with chemoradiotherapy versus 76·1% (71·6-80·9) with radiotherapy alone (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·70 [95% CI 0·51-0·97], p=0·034), and 5-year failure-free survival was 76·5% (95% CI 71·5-80·7) versus 69·1% (63·8-73·8; HR 0·70 [0·52-0·94], p=0·016). Distant metastases were the first site of recurrence in most patients with a relapse, occurring in 78 of 330 women (5-year probability 21·4%; 95% CI 17·3-26·3) in the chemoradiotherapy group versus 98 of 330 (5-year probability 29·1%; 24·4-34·3) in the radiotherapy-alone group (HR 0·74 [95% CI 0·55-0·99]; p=0·047). Isolated vaginal recurrence was the first site of recurrence in one patient (0·3%; 95% CI 0·0-2·1) in both groups (HR 0·99 [95% CI 0·06-15·90]; p=0·99), and isolated pelvic recurrence was the first site of recurrence in three women (0·9% [95% CI 0·3-2·8]) in the chemoradiotherapy group versus four (0·9% [95% CI 0·3-2·8]) in the radiotherapy-alone group (HR 0·75 [95% CI 0·17-3·33]; p=0·71). At 5 years, only one grade 4 adverse event (ileus or obstruction) was reported (in the chemoradiotherapy group). At 5 years, reported grade 3 adverse events did not differ significantly between the two groups, occurring in 16 (8%) of 201 women in the chemoradiotherapy group versus ten (5%) of 187 in the radiotherapy-alone group (p=0·24). The most common grade 3 adverse event was hypertension (in four [2%] women in both groups). At 5 years, grade 2 or worse adverse events were reported in 76 (38%) of 201 women in the chemoradiotherapy group versus 43 (23%) of 187 in the radiotherapy-alone group (p=0·002). Sensory neuropathy persisted more often after chemoradiotherapy than after radiotherapy alone, with 5-year rates of grade 2 or worse neuropathy of 6% (13 of 201 women) versus 0% (0 of 187). No treatment-related deaths were reported. INTERPRETATION This updated analysis shows significantly improved overall survival and failure-free survival with chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone. This treatment schedule should be discussed and recommended, especially for women with stage III or serous cancers, or both, as part of shared decision making between doctors and patients. Follow-up is ongoing to evaluate long-term survival. FUNDING Dutch Cancer Society, Cancer Research UK, National Health and Medical Research Council, Project Grant, Cancer Australia Grant, Italian Medicines Agency, and the Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie M de Boer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands,Correspondence to: Dr Stephanie de Boer, Department of Radiation Oncology, K1-P, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Melanie E Powell
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Linda Mileshkin
- Division of Cancer Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Dionyssios Katsaros
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Gynecologic Oncology, Città della Salute and S Anna Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Paul Bessette
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | | | | | - Jonathan A Ledermann
- Cancer Research UK, London, UK,UCL Cancer Trials Centre, UCL Cancer Institute, London, UK
| | - Pearly Khaw
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Romerai D'Amico
- Division of Radiation Oncology, ASST-Lecco, Ospedale AManzoni, Lecco, Italy
| | - Anthony Fyles
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Marie-Helene Baron
- Department of Radiotherapy, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Besançon, Besançon, France
| | | | - Henry C Kitchener
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Hans W Nijman
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Godfrey Wilson
- Department of Pathology, Central Manchester Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK
| | - Susan Brooks
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Sergio Gribaudo
- Department of Oncology – Radiotherapy, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Diane Provencher
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Hôpital Notre-Dame de Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Chantal Hanzen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
| | - Roy F Kruitwagen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands,GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | | | - Naveena Singh
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Viet Do
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Liverpool Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
| | - Andrea Lissoni
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Remi A Nout
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Amanda Feeney
- Cancer Research UK, London, UK,UCL Cancer Trials Centre, UCL Cancer Institute, London, UK
| | | | - Hein Putter
- Department of Medical Statistics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Carien L Creutzberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
IJsbrandy C, Hermens RPMG, Boerboom LWM, Gerritsen WR, van Harten WH, Ottevanger PB. Implementing physical activity programs for patients with cancer in current practice: patients' experienced barriers and facilitators. J Cancer Surviv 2019; 13:703-712. [PMID: 31347009 PMCID: PMC6828940 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-019-00789-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2019] [Accepted: 07/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Purpose The present study aimed to identify patients’ experienced barriers and facilitators in implementing physical activity programs for patients with cancer. Methods We interviewed 34 patients in focus-group-interviews from three different hospital-types. We included patients with cancer who were either receiving curative treatment or had recently completed it. Barriers and facilitators were explored in six domains: (1) physical activity programs, (2) patients, (3) healthcare professionals (HCPs), (4) social setting, (5) organization, and (6) law and governance. Results We found 12 barriers and 1 facilitator that affect the implementation of physical activity programs. In the domain of physical activity programs, the barrier was physical activity programs not being tailored to the patient’s needs. In the domain of patients, lacking responsibility for one’s own health was a barrier. Knowledge and skills for physical activity programs and non-commitment of HCPs impeded implementation in the domain of HCPs. Barriers in the domain of organization included inconvenient place, time of day, and point in the health treatment schedule for offering the physical activity programs, inadequate capacity, inaccessibility of contact persons, lack of information about physical activity programs, non-involvement of the general practitioner in the cancer care process, and poor communication between secondary and primary HCPs. Insufficient insurance-coverage of physical activity programs was a barrier in the domain of law and governance. In the domain of physical activity programs, contact with peers facilitated implementation. We found no barriers or facilitators at the social setting. Conclusions Factors affecting the implementation of physical activity programs occurred in various domains. Most of the barriers occurred in the domain of organization. Implications for Cancer survivors An implementation strategy that deals with the barriers might improve the implementation of physical activity programs and quality of life of cancer survivors. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s11764-019-00789-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte IJsbrandy
- Radboud Institute for Health Science (RIHS), Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Radboud Institute for Health Science (RIHS), Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Rosella P. M. G. Hermens
- Radboud Institute for Health Science (RIHS), Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Laura W. M. Boerboom
- Radboud Institute for Health Science (RIHS), Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Winald R. Gerritsen
- Radboud Institute for Health Science (RIHS), Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Wim H. van Harten
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Health Technology and Services Research, MB-HTSR, University of Twente, PO Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Petronella B. Ottevanger
- Radboud Institute for Health Science (RIHS), Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Matulonis UA, Shapira-Frommer R, Santin AD, Lisyanskaya AS, Pignata S, Vergote I, Raspagliesi F, Sonke GS, Birrer M, Provencher DM, Sehouli J, Colombo N, González-Martín A, Oaknin A, Ottevanger PB, Rudaitis V, Katchar K, Wu H, Keefe S, Ruman J, Ledermann JA. Antitumor activity and safety of pembrolizumab in patients with advanced recurrent ovarian cancer: results from the phase II KEYNOTE-100 study. Ann Oncol 2019; 30:1080-1087. [PMID: 31046082 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 404] [Impact Index Per Article: 80.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advanced recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC) is the leading cause of gynecologic cancer-related death in developed countries and new treatments are needed. Previous studies of immune checkpoint blockade showed low objective response rates (ORR) in ROC with no identified predictive biomarker. PATIENTS AND METHODS This phase II study of pembrolizumab (NCT02674061) examined two patient cohorts with ROC: cohort A received one to three prior lines of treatment with a platinum-free interval (PFI) or treatment-free interval (TFI) between 3 and 12 months and cohort B received four to six prior lines with a PFI/TFI of ≥3 months. Pembrolizumab 200 mg was administered intravenously every 3 weeks until cancer progression, toxicity, or completion of 2 years. Primary end points were ORR by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 per blinded independent central review by cohort and by PD-L1 expression measured as combined positive score (CPS). Secondary end points included duration of response (DOR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS Cohort A enrolled 285 patients; the first 100 served as the training set for PD-L1 biomarker analysis. Cohort B enrolled 91 patients. ORR was 7.4% for cohort A and 9.9% for cohort B. Median DOR was 8.2 months for cohort A and not reached for cohort B. DCR was 37.2% and 37.4%, respectively, in cohorts A and B. Based on the training set analysis, CPS 1 and 10 were selected for evaluation in the confirmation set. In the confirmation set, ORR was 4.1% for CPS <1, 5.7% CPS ≥1, and 10.0% for CPS ≥10. PFS was 2.1 months for both cohorts. Median OS was not reached for cohort A and was 17.6 months for cohort B. Toxicities were consistent with other single-agent pembrolizumab trials. CONCLUSIONS Single-agent pembrolizumab showed modest activity in patients with ROC. Higher PD-L1 expression was correlated with higher response. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02674061.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell/drug therapy
- Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell/pathology
- Aged
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use
- Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/adverse effects
- Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use
- Cohort Studies
- Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous/drug therapy
- Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous/pathology
- Female
- Follow-Up Studies
- Humans
- Male
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology
- Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy
- Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology
- Prognosis
- Survival Rate
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- U A Matulonis
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA.
| | - R Shapira-Frommer
- Oncology Institute and Ella Lemelbaum Institute for Immuno-Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - A D Santin
- Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, USA
| | - A S Lisyanskaya
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, City Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Saint Petersburg, Russia
| | - S Pignata
- Department of Urogynaecological Oncology, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori "Fondazione G Pascale", IRCCS, Naples, Italy
| | - I Vergote
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - F Raspagliesi
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - G S Sonke
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M Birrer
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA
| | - D M Provencher
- Hôpital Notre-Dame - Pavillon L-C Simard, Centre Hospitalier de L'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, Canada
| | - J Sehouli
- Gynecology and Obstetrics, Charité-Medical University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - N Colombo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Milano-Bicocca and European Institute of Oncology, Milano, Italy
| | - A González-Martín
- Medical Oncology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra; formerly of MD Anderson International España, Madrid
| | - A Oaknin
- Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | - P B Ottevanger
- Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - V Rudaitis
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vilnius University Institute of Clinical Medicine, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - K Katchar
- Companion Diagnostics, Merck & Co., Inc, Kenilworth, USA
| | - H Wu
- BARDS, MSD China, Beijing, China
| | - S Keefe
- Clinical Development, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, USA
| | - J Ruman
- Clinical Development, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, USA
| | - J A Ledermann
- UCL Cancer Institute and UCL Hospitals, Department of Oncology, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Timmermans M, Sonke GS, Van de Vijver KK, Ottevanger PB, Nijman HW, van der Aa MA, Kruitwagen RFPM. Localization of distant metastases defines prognosis and treatment efficacy in patients with FIGO stage IV ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2019; 29:392-397. [PMID: 30665898 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2018-000100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2018] [Revised: 10/10/2018] [Accepted: 12/27/2018] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with ovarian cancer who are diagnosed with Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IV disease are a highly heterogeneous group with possible survival differences. The FIGO staging system was therefore updated in 2014. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the 2014 changes to FIGO stage IV ovarian cancer on overall survival. METHODS We identified all patients diagnosed with FIGO stage IV disease between January 2008 and December 2015 from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. We analyzed the prognostic effect of FIGO IVa versus IVb. In addition, patients with extra-abdominal lymph node involvement as the only site of distant disease were analyzed separately. Overall survival was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox regression models. RESULTS We identified 2436 FIGO IV patients, of whom 35% were diagnosed with FIGO IVa disease. Five-year overall survival of FIGO IVa and IVb patients (including those with no or limited therapy) was 8.9% and 13.0%, respectively (p=0.51). Patients with only extra-abdominal lymph node involvement had a significant better overall survival than all other FIGO IV patients (5-year overall survival 25.9%, hazard ratio 0.77 [95% CI 0.62 to 0.95]). CONCLUSION Our study shows that the FIGO IV sub-classification into FIGO IVa and IVB does not provide additional prognostic information. Patients with extra-abdominal lymph node metastases as the only site of FIGO IV disease, however, have a better prognosis than all other FIGO IV patients. These results warrant a critical appraisal of the current FIGO IV sub-classification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maite Timmermans
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands .,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - G S Sonke
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - K K Van de Vijver
- Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium
| | - P B Ottevanger
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - H W Nijman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - M A van der Aa
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - R F P M Kruitwagen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Hensley ML, Enserro D, Hatcher H, Ottevanger PB, Krarup-Hansen A, Blay JY, Fisher C, Moxley KM, Lele SB, Lea JS, Tewari KS, Thaker PH, Zivanovic O, O’Malley DM, Robison K, Miller DS. Adjuvant Gemcitabine Plus Docetaxel Followed by Doxorubicin Versus Observation for High-Grade Uterine Leiomyosarcoma: A Phase III NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol 2018; 36:JCO1800454. [PMID: 30289732 PMCID: PMC6241678 DOI: 10.1200/jco.18.00454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We conducted a randomized phase III trial to determine whether adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival in women with uterine leiomyosarcoma. METHODS Women with uterus-confined, high-grade leiomyosarcoma who were confirmed disease free by imaging were randomly assigned to four cycles of gemcitabine plus docetaxel, followed by four cycles of doxorubicin, or to observation. All were followed for evidence of recurrence. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). RESULTS With international collaboration, 38 of the targeted accrual of 216 patients were enrolled, after which the study was closed by the National Cancer Institute for accrual futility. Twenty patients were assigned to chemotherapy, 18 to observation. Among the 17 patients treated with at least one cycle of chemotherapy, grade 3 or 4 toxicities were observed in 47%; among the 18 patients assigned to observation, one had grade 3 hypertension. There were six deaths (chemotherapy, n = 5; observation, n = 1), all due to disease. The restricted mean survival time for OS was estimated as 34.3 months (95% CI, 25.3 to 43.3 months) in the chemotherapy arm and as 46.4 months (95% CI, 43.6 to 49.1 months) in the observation arm. There were eight recurrences in each arm. The restricted mean survival time for recurrence-free survival was estimated as 18.1 (95% CI, 14.2 to 22.0) months in the chemotherapy arm and as 14.6 months (95% CI, 10.3 to 19.0 months) in the observation arm. Neither survival outcome comparison was considered statistically robust, due to the small sample size. CONCLUSION Despite international collaboration to test the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in uterine-confined leiomyosarcoma, this study was closed for accrual futility. Although the sample size precludes robust statistical comparison, observed OS and recurrence-free survival data do not show superior outcomes with adjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martee L. Hensley
- Martee L. Hensley, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Martee L. Hensley and Oliver Zivanovic, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City; Danielle Enserro and Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY; Helen Hatcher, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Cambridge; Cyril Fisher, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Petronella B. Ottevanger, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Anders Krarup-Hansen, University Hospital Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Jean-Yves Blay, Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; Katherine M. Moxley, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; Jayanthi S. Lea, and David S. Miller, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California at Irvine, Orange, CA; Premal H. Thaker, Washington University School of Medicine, and Siteman Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; David M. O’Malley, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH; Katina Robison, Women and Infants Hospital in Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - Danielle Enserro
- Martee L. Hensley, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Martee L. Hensley and Oliver Zivanovic, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City; Danielle Enserro and Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY; Helen Hatcher, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Cambridge; Cyril Fisher, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Petronella B. Ottevanger, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Anders Krarup-Hansen, University Hospital Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Jean-Yves Blay, Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; Katherine M. Moxley, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; Jayanthi S. Lea, and David S. Miller, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California at Irvine, Orange, CA; Premal H. Thaker, Washington University School of Medicine, and Siteman Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; David M. O’Malley, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH; Katina Robison, Women and Infants Hospital in Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - Helen Hatcher
- Martee L. Hensley, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Martee L. Hensley and Oliver Zivanovic, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City; Danielle Enserro and Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY; Helen Hatcher, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Cambridge; Cyril Fisher, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Petronella B. Ottevanger, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Anders Krarup-Hansen, University Hospital Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Jean-Yves Blay, Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; Katherine M. Moxley, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; Jayanthi S. Lea, and David S. Miller, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California at Irvine, Orange, CA; Premal H. Thaker, Washington University School of Medicine, and Siteman Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; David M. O’Malley, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH; Katina Robison, Women and Infants Hospital in Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - Petronella B. Ottevanger
- Martee L. Hensley, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Martee L. Hensley and Oliver Zivanovic, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City; Danielle Enserro and Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY; Helen Hatcher, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Cambridge; Cyril Fisher, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Petronella B. Ottevanger, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Anders Krarup-Hansen, University Hospital Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Jean-Yves Blay, Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; Katherine M. Moxley, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; Jayanthi S. Lea, and David S. Miller, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California at Irvine, Orange, CA; Premal H. Thaker, Washington University School of Medicine, and Siteman Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; David M. O’Malley, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH; Katina Robison, Women and Infants Hospital in Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - Anders Krarup-Hansen
- Martee L. Hensley, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Martee L. Hensley and Oliver Zivanovic, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City; Danielle Enserro and Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY; Helen Hatcher, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Cambridge; Cyril Fisher, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Petronella B. Ottevanger, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Anders Krarup-Hansen, University Hospital Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Jean-Yves Blay, Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; Katherine M. Moxley, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; Jayanthi S. Lea, and David S. Miller, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California at Irvine, Orange, CA; Premal H. Thaker, Washington University School of Medicine, and Siteman Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; David M. O’Malley, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH; Katina Robison, Women and Infants Hospital in Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - Jean-Yves Blay
- Martee L. Hensley, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Martee L. Hensley and Oliver Zivanovic, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City; Danielle Enserro and Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY; Helen Hatcher, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Cambridge; Cyril Fisher, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Petronella B. Ottevanger, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Anders Krarup-Hansen, University Hospital Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Jean-Yves Blay, Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; Katherine M. Moxley, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; Jayanthi S. Lea, and David S. Miller, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California at Irvine, Orange, CA; Premal H. Thaker, Washington University School of Medicine, and Siteman Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; David M. O’Malley, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH; Katina Robison, Women and Infants Hospital in Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - Cyril Fisher
- Martee L. Hensley, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Martee L. Hensley and Oliver Zivanovic, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City; Danielle Enserro and Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY; Helen Hatcher, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Cambridge; Cyril Fisher, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Petronella B. Ottevanger, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Anders Krarup-Hansen, University Hospital Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Jean-Yves Blay, Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; Katherine M. Moxley, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; Jayanthi S. Lea, and David S. Miller, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California at Irvine, Orange, CA; Premal H. Thaker, Washington University School of Medicine, and Siteman Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; David M. O’Malley, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH; Katina Robison, Women and Infants Hospital in Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - Katherine M. Moxley
- Martee L. Hensley, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Martee L. Hensley and Oliver Zivanovic, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City; Danielle Enserro and Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY; Helen Hatcher, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Cambridge; Cyril Fisher, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Petronella B. Ottevanger, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Anders Krarup-Hansen, University Hospital Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Jean-Yves Blay, Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; Katherine M. Moxley, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; Jayanthi S. Lea, and David S. Miller, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California at Irvine, Orange, CA; Premal H. Thaker, Washington University School of Medicine, and Siteman Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; David M. O’Malley, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH; Katina Robison, Women and Infants Hospital in Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - Shashikant B. Lele
- Martee L. Hensley, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Martee L. Hensley and Oliver Zivanovic, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City; Danielle Enserro and Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY; Helen Hatcher, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Cambridge; Cyril Fisher, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Petronella B. Ottevanger, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Anders Krarup-Hansen, University Hospital Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Jean-Yves Blay, Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; Katherine M. Moxley, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; Jayanthi S. Lea, and David S. Miller, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California at Irvine, Orange, CA; Premal H. Thaker, Washington University School of Medicine, and Siteman Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; David M. O’Malley, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH; Katina Robison, Women and Infants Hospital in Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - Jayanthi S. Lea
- Martee L. Hensley, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Martee L. Hensley and Oliver Zivanovic, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City; Danielle Enserro and Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY; Helen Hatcher, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Cambridge; Cyril Fisher, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Petronella B. Ottevanger, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Anders Krarup-Hansen, University Hospital Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Jean-Yves Blay, Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; Katherine M. Moxley, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; Jayanthi S. Lea, and David S. Miller, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California at Irvine, Orange, CA; Premal H. Thaker, Washington University School of Medicine, and Siteman Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; David M. O’Malley, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH; Katina Robison, Women and Infants Hospital in Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - Krishnansu S. Tewari
- Martee L. Hensley, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Martee L. Hensley and Oliver Zivanovic, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City; Danielle Enserro and Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY; Helen Hatcher, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Cambridge; Cyril Fisher, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Petronella B. Ottevanger, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Anders Krarup-Hansen, University Hospital Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Jean-Yves Blay, Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; Katherine M. Moxley, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; Jayanthi S. Lea, and David S. Miller, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California at Irvine, Orange, CA; Premal H. Thaker, Washington University School of Medicine, and Siteman Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; David M. O’Malley, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH; Katina Robison, Women and Infants Hospital in Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - Premal H. Thaker
- Martee L. Hensley, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Martee L. Hensley and Oliver Zivanovic, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City; Danielle Enserro and Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY; Helen Hatcher, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Cambridge; Cyril Fisher, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Petronella B. Ottevanger, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Anders Krarup-Hansen, University Hospital Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Jean-Yves Blay, Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; Katherine M. Moxley, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; Jayanthi S. Lea, and David S. Miller, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California at Irvine, Orange, CA; Premal H. Thaker, Washington University School of Medicine, and Siteman Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; David M. O’Malley, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH; Katina Robison, Women and Infants Hospital in Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - Oliver Zivanovic
- Martee L. Hensley, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Martee L. Hensley and Oliver Zivanovic, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City; Danielle Enserro and Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY; Helen Hatcher, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Cambridge; Cyril Fisher, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Petronella B. Ottevanger, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Anders Krarup-Hansen, University Hospital Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Jean-Yves Blay, Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; Katherine M. Moxley, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; Jayanthi S. Lea, and David S. Miller, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California at Irvine, Orange, CA; Premal H. Thaker, Washington University School of Medicine, and Siteman Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; David M. O’Malley, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH; Katina Robison, Women and Infants Hospital in Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - David M. O’Malley
- Martee L. Hensley, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Martee L. Hensley and Oliver Zivanovic, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City; Danielle Enserro and Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY; Helen Hatcher, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Cambridge; Cyril Fisher, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Petronella B. Ottevanger, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Anders Krarup-Hansen, University Hospital Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Jean-Yves Blay, Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; Katherine M. Moxley, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; Jayanthi S. Lea, and David S. Miller, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California at Irvine, Orange, CA; Premal H. Thaker, Washington University School of Medicine, and Siteman Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; David M. O’Malley, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH; Katina Robison, Women and Infants Hospital in Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - Katina Robison
- Martee L. Hensley, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Martee L. Hensley and Oliver Zivanovic, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City; Danielle Enserro and Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY; Helen Hatcher, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Cambridge; Cyril Fisher, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Petronella B. Ottevanger, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Anders Krarup-Hansen, University Hospital Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Jean-Yves Blay, Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; Katherine M. Moxley, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; Jayanthi S. Lea, and David S. Miller, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California at Irvine, Orange, CA; Premal H. Thaker, Washington University School of Medicine, and Siteman Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; David M. O’Malley, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH; Katina Robison, Women and Infants Hospital in Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - David S. Miller
- Martee L. Hensley, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Martee L. Hensley and Oliver Zivanovic, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City; Danielle Enserro and Shashikant B. Lele, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY; Helen Hatcher, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Cambridge; Cyril Fisher, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Petronella B. Ottevanger, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Anders Krarup-Hansen, University Hospital Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Jean-Yves Blay, Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; Katherine M. Moxley, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; Jayanthi S. Lea, and David S. Miller, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California at Irvine, Orange, CA; Premal H. Thaker, Washington University School of Medicine, and Siteman Cancer Center, St Louis, MO; David M. O’Malley, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH; Katina Robison, Women and Infants Hospital in Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Henselmans I, van Laarhoven HWM, de Haes HCJM, Tokat M, Engelhardt EG, van Maarschalkerweerd PEA, Kunneman M, Ottevanger PB, Dohmen SE, Creemers GJ, Sommeijer DW, de Vos FYFL, Smets EMA. Training for Medical Oncologists on Shared Decision-Making About Palliative Chemotherapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Oncologist 2018; 24:259-265. [PMID: 29959285 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2018] [Accepted: 04/26/2018] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Systemic treatment for advanced cancer offers uncertain and sometimes limited benefit, while the burden can be high. This study examines the effect of shared decision-making (SDM) training for medical oncologists on observed SDM in standardized patient assessments. MATERIALS AND METHODS A randomized controlled trial comparing training with standard practice was conducted. Medical oncologists and oncologists-in-training (n = 31) participated in a video-recorded, standardized patient assessment at baseline (T0) and after 4 months (T1, after training). The training was based on a four-stage SDM model and consisted of a reader, two group sessions (3.5 hours each), a booster session (1.5 hours), and a consultation card. The primary outcome was observed SDM as assessed with the Observing Patient Involvement scale (OPTION12) coded by observers blinded for arm. Secondary outcomes were observed SDM per stage, communication skills, and oncologists' satisfaction with communication. RESULTS The training had a significant and large effect on observed SDM in the simulated consultations (Cohen's f = 0.62) and improved observed SDM behavior in all four SDM stages (f = 0.39-0.72). The training improved oncologists' information provision skills (f = 0.77), skills related to anticipating/responding to emotions (f = 0.42), and their satisfaction with the consultation (f = 0.53). CONCLUSION Training medical oncologists in SDM about palliative systemic treatment improves their performance in simulated consultations. The next step is to examine the effect of such training on SDM in clinical practice and on patient outcomes. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Systemic treatment for advanced cancer offers uncertain and sometimes limited benefit, while the burden can be high. Hence, applying the premises of shared decision-making (SDM) is recommended. SDM is increasingly advocated based on the ethical imperative to provide patient-centered care and the increasing evidence for beneficial patient outcomes. Few studies examined the effectiveness of SDM training in robust designs. This randomized controlled trial demonstrated that SDM training (10 hours) improves oncologists' performance in consultations with standardized patients. The next step is to examine the effect of training on oncologists' performance and patient outcomes in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inge Henselmans
- Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hanneke W M van Laarhoven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hanneke C J M de Haes
- Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Meltem Tokat
- Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ellen G Engelhardt
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Marleen Kunneman
- Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Petronella B Ottevanger
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Serge E Dohmen
- Department of Internal Medicine, BovenIJ Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Geert-Jan Creemers
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Dirkje W Sommeijer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine, Flevo Hospital, Almere, The Netherlands
| | - Filip Y F L de Vos
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ellen M A Smets
- Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Paoletti X, Lewsley LA, Daniele G, Cook AD, Yanaihara N, Tinker A, Kristensen G, Ottevanger PB, Aravantinos G, Boere IA, Fruscio R, Reyners AK, Pujade-Lauraine E, Harkin A, Pignata S, Kagimura T, Welch S, Eleni K, Glasspool RM. Progression free survival (PFS) as a surrogate endpoint for overall survival (OS) in first-line advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) therapy: A Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup individual (GCIG) patient-level (IPD) analysis of multiple randomized trials. J Clin Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2018.36.15_suppl.5576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Gennaro Daniele
- Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori “Fondazione G. Pascale”- IRCCS, Naples, Italy
| | | | | | - Anna Tinker
- British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Ingrid A. Boere
- Department of Medical Oncology, Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Robert Fruscio
- University of Milan & Bicocca San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - Anna K.L. Reyners
- University Medical Center, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | | | - Andrea Harkin
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Cancer Research, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | | | - Tatsuo Kagimura
- Foundation for Biomedical Research and Innovation, Translational Research Informatics Center, Kobe, Japan
| | | | - Karamouza Eleni
- Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer Meta-Analysis Platform, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Gustave-Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Eysbouts YK, Ottevanger PB, Massuger LFAG, IntHout J, Short D, Harvey R, Kaur B, Sebire NJ, Sarwar N, Sweep FCGJ, Seckl MJ. Can the FIGO 2000 scoring system for gestational trophoblastic neoplasia be simplified? A new retrospective analysis from a nationwide dataset. Ann Oncol 2018; 28:1856-1861. [PMID: 28459944 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Worldwide introduction of the International Fedaration of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2000 scoring system has provided an effective means to stratify patients with gestational trophoblastic neoplasia to single- or multi-agent chemotherapy. However, the system is quite elaborate with an extensive set of risk factors. In this study, we re-evaluate all prognostic risk factors involved in the FIGO 2000 scoring system and examine if simplification is feasible. Patients and methods Between January 2003 and December 2012, 813 patients diagnosed with gestational trophoblastic neoplasia were identified at the Trophoblastic Disease Centre in London and scored using the FIGO 2000. Multivariable analysis and stepwise logistic regression were carried out to evaluate whether the FIGO 2000 scoring system could be simplified. Results Of the eight FIGO risk factors only pre-treatment serum human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) levels exceeding 10 000 IU/l (OR = 5.0; 95% CI 2.5-10.4) and 100 000 IU/l (OR = 14.3; 95% CI 4.7-44.1), interval exceeding 7 months since antecedent pregnancy (OR = 4.1; 95% CI 1.0-16.2), and tumor size of over 5 cm (OR = 2.2; 95% CI 1.3-3.6) were identified as independently predictive for single-agent resistance. In addition, increased risk was apparent for antecedent term pregnancy (OR = 3.4; 95% CI 0.9-12.7) and the presence of five or more metastases (OR = 3.5; 95% CI 0.4-30.4), but patient numbers in these categories were relatively small. Stepwise logistic regression identified a simplified risk scoring model comprising age, pretreatment serum hCG, number of metastases, antecedent pregnancy, and interval but omitting tumor size, previous failed chemotherapy, and site of metastases. With this model only 1 out 725 patients was classified different from the FIGO 2000 system. Conclusion Our simplified alternative using only five of the FIGO prognostic factors appears to be an accurate system for discriminating patients requiring single as opposed to multi-agent chemotherapy. Further work is urgently needed to validate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - J IntHout
- Department of Health Evidence, Section Biostatistics, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - D Short
- Department of Medical Oncology
| | | | - B Kaur
- Department of Pathology, Charing Cross and Hammersmith Campuses, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - N J Sebire
- Department of Pathology, Charing Cross and Hammersmith Campuses, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | - F C G J Sweep
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
de Haan J, Verheecke M, Van Calsteren K, Van Calster B, Shmakov RG, Mhallem Gziri M, Halaska MJ, Fruscio R, Lok CAR, Boere IA, Zola P, Ottevanger PB, de Groot CJM, Peccatori FA, Dahl Steffensen K, Cardonick EH, Polushkina E, Rob L, Ceppi L, Sukhikh GT, Han SN, Amant F. Oncological management and obstetric and neonatal outcomes for women diagnosed with cancer during pregnancy: a 20-year international cohort study of 1170 patients. Lancet Oncol 2018; 19:337-346. [DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30059-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 127] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2017] [Revised: 11/13/2017] [Accepted: 11/21/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
45
|
IJsbrandy C, Ottevanger PB, Tsekou Diogeni M, Gerritsen WR, van Harten WH, Hermens RPMG. Review: Effectiveness of implementation strategies to increase physical activity uptake during and after cancer treatment. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2018; 122:157-163. [PMID: 29458784 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2017.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2017] [Revised: 08/11/2017] [Accepted: 09/11/2017] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this review was to assess the effectiveness of different strategies to implement physical activity during and after cancer treatment. DESIGN We searched for studies containing strategies to implement physical activity in cancer care that meet the inclusion criteria of the Cochrane EPOC group. The primary outcome was physical activity uptake. We expressed the effectiveness of the strategies as the percentage of studies with improvement. RESULTS Nine studies met the inclusion criteria. Patient groups doing physical activities via an implementation strategy had better outcomes than those receiving usual care: 83% of the studies showed improvement. Strategies showing significant improvement compared to usual care employed healthcare professionals to provide individual counselling or advice for exercise or interactive elements such as audit and feedback systems. When comparing the different strategies 1) interactive elements or 2) elements tailored to the needs of the patients had better physical activity uptake. CONCLUSIONS Implementation strategies containing individual and interactive elements, tailored to the individual needs of patients, are more successful in improving physical activity uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C IJsbrandy
- Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud Institute for Health Science (RIHS), Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud Institute for Health Science (RIHS), Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - P B Ottevanger
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud Institute for Health Science (RIHS), Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - M Tsekou Diogeni
- Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud Institute for Health Science (RIHS), Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - W R Gerritsen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud Institute for Health Science (RIHS), Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - W H van Harten
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Health Technology and Services Research, MB-HTSR, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
| | - R P M G Hermens
- Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud Institute for Health Science (RIHS), Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Desar IME, Ottevanger PB, Benson C, van der Graaf WTA. Systemic treatment in adult uterine sarcomas. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2017; 122:10-20. [PMID: 29458779 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2017.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2017] [Accepted: 12/12/2017] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Uterine sarcomas (US) are rare mesenchymal tumours of the uterus and are divided mainly into uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS), low grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS), high grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (HG-ESS), adenosarcomas and high grade undifferentiated sarcoma (HGUS). US are often high-grade tumours with a high local recurrence rate and metastatic risk. We here discuss the current standard of care and knowledge of systemic therapy for adult uterine sarcomas, in particular uLMS, LG-ESS, HG-ESS and HGUS, in both the adjuvant as well as the metastatic setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I M E Desar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - P B Ottevanger
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - C Benson
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - W T A van der Graaf
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, London, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Oostendorp LJM, Ottevanger PB, Donders ART, van de Wouw AJ, Schoenaker IJH, Smilde TJ, van der Graaf WTA, Stalmeier PFM. Decision aids for second-line palliative chemotherapy: a randomised phase II multicentre trial. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2017; 17:130. [PMID: 28859646 PMCID: PMC5580234 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-017-0529-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2017] [Accepted: 08/21/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is increasing recognition of the delicate balance between the modest benefits of palliative chemotherapy and the burden of treatment. Decision aids (DAs) can potentially help patients with advanced cancer with these difficult treatment decisions, but providing detailed information could have an adverse impact on patients' well-being. The objective of this randomised phase II study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of DAs for patients with advanced cancer considering second-line chemotherapy. METHODS Patients with advanced breast or colorectal cancer considering second-line treatment were randomly assigned to usual care (control group) or usual care plus a DA (intervention group) in a 1:2 ratio. A nurse offered a DA with information on adverse events, tumour response and survival. Outcome measures included patient-reported well-being (primary outcome: anxiety) and quality of the decision-making process and the resulting choice. RESULTS Of 128 patients randomised, 45 were assigned to the control group and 83 to the intervention group. Median age was 62 years (range 32-81), 63% were female, and 73% had colorectal cancer. The large majority of patients preferred treatment with chemotherapy (87%) and subsequently commenced treatment with chemotherapy (86%). No adverse impact on patients' well-being was found and nurses reported that consultations in which the DAs were offered went well. Being offered the DA was associated with stronger treatment preferences (3.0 vs. 2.5; p=0.030) and increased subjective knowledge (6.7 vs. 6.3; p=0.022). Objective knowledge, risk perception and perceived involvement were comparable between the groups. CONCLUSIONS DAs containing detailed risk information on second-line palliative treatment could be delivered to patients with advanced cancer without having an adverse impact on patient well-being. Surprisingly, the DAs only marginally improved the quality of the decision-making process. The effectiveness of DAs for palliative treatment decisions needs further exploration. TRIAL REGISTRATION Netherlands Trial Registry (NTR): NTR1113 (registered on 2 November 2007).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Agnes J van de Wouw
- Department of Internal Medicine, VieCuri Medical Centre, Venlo, the Netherlands
| | | | - Tineke J Smilde
- Department of Medical Oncology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, the Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
de Boer SM, Powell ME, Mileshkin LR, Katsaros D, Bessette P, Haie-Meder C, Ottevanger PB, Ledermann JA, Khaw P, Colombo A, Fyles AW, Baron MH, Kitchener HC, Nijman H, Kruitwagen RF, Jurgenliemk-Schulz IM, Nout RA, Smit VT, Putter H, Creutzberg CL. Final results of the international randomized PORTEC-3 trial of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy (RT) versus RT alone for women with high-risk endometrial cancer. J Clin Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.5502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
5502 Background: Women with high-risk endometrial cancer (HREC) are at increased risk of distant metastasis and endometrial cancer-related death. The randomized PORTEC-3 intergroup trial was initiated to investigate the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy during and after radiotherapy (CTRT) versus pelvic radiotherapy (RT) alone for women with HREC. Methods: Women with HREC (FIGO stage I grade 3 with deep myometrial invasion and/or LVSI; stage II or III; or serous/clear cell histology) were randomly allocated (1:1) to RT (48.6 Gy in 1.8 Gy fractions) or CTRT (two cycles of cisplatin 50 mg/m² in week 1 and 4 of RT, followed by four cycles of carboplatin AUC5 and paclitaxel 175 mg/m² at 3-week intervals) with stratification for participating center, lymphadenectomy, stage, and histological type. The co-primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and failure-free survival (FFS). The Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test and Cox regression analysis were used for final analysis according to intention-to-treat. PORTEC-3 is registered with ISRCTN (ISRCTN14387080) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00411138). Results: 686 women were enrolled between 2006 and 2013. 26 women were excluded; 13 withdrew consent early and 13 were ineligible, which left 660 patients in the analysis, with a median follow up time of 60.2 months (IQR 47.1–72.9): 330 CTRT and 330 RT. Three- and five-year OS for CTRT vs. RT was 84.4% versus 83.9%, and 81.8% versus 76.7%; overall HR 0.79 [95% CI 0.57-1.12, p=0.183]. Three-year FFS was 79.7% (CTRT) versus 71.8% (RT), and at 5 years 75.5% versus 68.9%, overall HR for FFS 0.77 [0.58-1.03, p=0.078]. Patients with stage III EC had lower 5-year FFS and OS compared to stage I-II (FFS 63.9% vs 78.9%, p<0.001, and OS 74.3% vs 83.1%, p=0.003). They also had greatest benefit of CTRT: 5-year FFS for stage III was 69.3% for CTRT vs 58.0% for RT [95% CI 0.45-0.97, p=0.032], and 5-year OS for stage III was 78.7 % vs 69.8% (p=0.114). Conclusions: Adjuvant chemotherapy given during and after pelvic radiotherapy for treatment of HREC did not significantly improve 5-year FFS and OS, compared with RT alone. For women with stage III EC FFS was however significantly improved with CTRT by 11% at 5 years. Follow-up will continue to evaluate long-term outcomes. Clinical trial information: NCT00411138.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie M. de Boer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Melanie E. Powell
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Linda R. Mileshkin
- Division of Cancer Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Dionyssios Katsaros
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Gynecologic Oncology, Città della Salute and S Anna Hospital, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Paul Bessette
- National Cancer Institute of Canada, Clinical Trials Group, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Pearly Khaw
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Alessandro Colombo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, A.O. della Provincia di Lecco, Lecco, Italy
| | - Anthony W. Fyles
- NCIC-CTG, Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Marie-Helene Baron
- Department of Radiotherapy, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Besançon, Besançon, France
| | - Henry C. Kitchener
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Hans Nijman
- University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Roy F.P.M. Kruitwagen
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, and GROW – School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | | | - Remi A. Nout
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | | | - Hein Putter
- Department of Medical Statistics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Carien L. Creutzberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Eysbouts YK, Massuger LFAG, IntHout J, Lok CAR, Sweep FCGJ, Ottevanger PB. The added value of hysterectomy in the management of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia. Gynecol Oncol 2017; 145:536-542. [PMID: 28390821 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.03.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2017] [Revised: 03/15/2017] [Accepted: 03/23/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the undoubted effectiveness of chemotherapeutic treatment in gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN), problems related to toxicity of chemotherapy and chemo-resistant disease have led to reconsideration of the use of hysterectomy. Aim of the present study was to evaluate indications for and outcome of hysterectomy in patients with GTN in a nation-wide cohort. METHODS Between 1977 and 2012, we identified all patients diagnosed with GTN and treated with hysterectomy from the Dutch national databases. Demographics, clinical characteristics and follow-up were recorded retrospectively. RESULTS One hundred and nine patients (16.5% of all registered patients with GTN) underwent hysterectomy as part of their management for GTN. The majority of patients was classified as low-risk disease (74.3%), post-molar GTN (73.5%) and disease confined to the uterus (65.1%). After hysterectomy, complete remission was achieved in 66.2% of patients with localized disease and in 15.8% of patients with metastatic disease. For patients with localized disease, treated with primary hysterectomy, treatment duration was significantly shorter (mean 3.2weeks and 8.0weeks respectively, p=0.01) with lower number of administered chemotherapy cycles (mean 1.5 and 5.8 respectively, p<0.01) than patients in a matched control group. CONCLUSION In selected cases, a hysterectomy may be an effective means to either reduce or eliminate tumor bulk. Primary hysterectomy should mainly be considered in older patients with localized disease and no desire to preserve fertility, whereas patients with chemotherapy-resistant disease may benefit from additional hysterectomy, especially when disease is localized. For patients with widespread metastatic disease, the benefit of hysterectomy lies in the removal of chemotherapy-resistant tumor bulk with subsequent effect on survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y K Eysbouts
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - L F A G Massuger
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - J IntHout
- Department for Health Evidence, Section Biostatistics, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - C A R Lok
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek - The Netherlands Cancer Institute Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - F C G J Sweep
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - P B Ottevanger
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Boekhout AH, Gietema JA, Milojkovic Kerklaan B, van Werkhoven ED, Altena R, Honkoop A, Los M, Smit WM, Nieboer P, Smorenburg CH, Mandigers CMPW, van der Wouw AJ, Kessels L, van der Velden AWG, Ottevanger PB, Smilde T, de Boer J, van Veldhuisen DJ, Kema IP, de Vries EGE, Schellens JHM. Angiotensin II-Receptor Inhibition With Candesartan to Prevent Trastuzumab-Related Cardiotoxic Effects in Patients With Early Breast Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol 2017; 2:1030-7. [PMID: 27348762 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.1726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 136] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE This is the first randomized placebo-controlled evaluation of a medical intervention for the prevention of trastuzumab-related cardiotoxic effects. OBJECTIVE To determine as the primary end point whether angiotensin II antagonist treatment with candesartan can prevent or ameliorate trastuzumab-related cardiotoxic effects, defined as a decline in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of more than 15% or a decrease below the absolute value 45%. DESIGN This randomized, placebo-controlled clinical study was conducted between October 2007 and October 2011 in 19 hospitals in the Netherlands, enrolling 210 women with early breast cancer testing positive for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) who were being considered for adjuvant systemic treatment with anthracycline-containing chemotherapy followed by trastuzumab. INTERVENTIONS A total of 78 weeks of candesartan (32 mg/d) or placebo treatment; study treatment started at the same day as the first trastuzumab administration and continued until 26 weeks after completion of trastuzumab treatment. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was LVEF. Secondary end points included whether the N-terminal of the prohormone brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and high-sensitivity troponin T (hs-TnT) can be used as surrogate markers and whether genetic variability in germline ERBB2 (formerly HER2 or HER2/neu) correlates with trastuzumab-related cardiotoxic effects. RESULTS A total of 206 participants were evaluable (mean age, 49 years; age range, 25-69 years) 103 in the candesartan group (mean age, 50 years; age range, 25-69 years) and 103 in the placebo group (mean age, 50 years; age range, 30-67 years). Of these, 36 manifested at least 1 of the 2 primary cardiac end points. There were 3.8% more cardiac events in the candesartan group than in the placebo group (95% CI, -7% to 15%; P = .58): 20 events (19%) and 16 events (16%), respectively. The 2-year cumulative incidence of cardiac events was 0.28 (95% CI, 0.13-0.40) in the candesartan group and 0.16 (95% CI, 0.08-0.22) in the placebo group (P = .56). Candesartan did not affect changes in NT-proBNP and hs-TnT values, and these biomarkers were not associated with significant changes in LVEF. The Ala1170Pro homozygous ERBB2 genotype was associated with a lower likelihood of the occurrence of a cardiac event compared with Pro/Pro + Ala/Pro genotypes in multivariate analysis (odds ratio, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.02-0.45; P = .003). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The findings do not support the hypothesis that concomitant use of candesartan protects against a decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction during or shortly after trastuzumab treatment in early breast cancer. The ERBB2 germline Ala1170Pro single nucleotide polymorphism may be used to identify patients who are at increased risk of trastuzumab-related cardiotoxic effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00459771.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annelies H Boekhout
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jourik A Gietema
- Department of Medical Oncology University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Renske Altena
- Department of Medical Oncology University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Aafke Honkoop
- Department of Internal Medicine, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - Maartje Los
- Department of Internal Medicine, Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Willem M Smit
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - Peter Nieboer
- Department of Internal Medicine, Wilhelmina Hospital, Assen, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Agnes J van der Wouw
- Department of Internal Medicine, VieCuri Medical Center Noord-Limburg, Venlo, the Netherlands
| | - Lonneke Kessels
- Department of Internal Medicine, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, the Netherlands
| | | | - Petronella B Ottevanger
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Tineke Smilde
- Department of Internal Medicine, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, the Netherlands
| | - Jaap de Boer
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital de Tjongerschans, Heerenveen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Ido P Kema
- Department of Laboratory Medicine University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Elisabeth G E de Vries
- Department of Medical Oncology University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Jan H M Schellens
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands18Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Science Faculty Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|