1
|
Yunus IS, Hudson GA, Chen Y, Gin JW, Kim J, Baidoo EEK, Petzold CJ, Adams PD, Simmons BA, Mukhopadhyay A, Keasling JD, Lee TS. Systematic engineering for production of anti-aging sunscreen compound in Pseudomonas putida. Metab Eng 2024; 84:69-82. [PMID: 38839037 DOI: 10.1016/j.ymben.2024.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2024] [Revised: 05/25/2024] [Accepted: 06/03/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024]
Abstract
Sunscreen has been used for thousands of years to protect skin from ultraviolet radiation. However, the use of modern commercial sunscreen containing oxybenzone, ZnO, and TiO2 has raised concerns due to their negative effects on human health and the environment. In this study, we aim to establish an efficient microbial platform for production of shinorine, a UV light absorbing compound with anti-aging properties. First, we methodically selected an appropriate host for shinorine production by analyzing central carbon flux distribution data from prior studies alongside predictions from genome-scale metabolic models (GEMs). We enhanced shinorine productivity through CRISPRi-mediated downregulation and utilized shotgun proteomics to pinpoint potential competing pathways. Simultaneously, we improved the shinorine biosynthetic pathway by refining its design, optimizing promoter usage, and altering the strength of ribosome binding sites. Finally, we conducted amino acid feeding experiments under various conditions to identify the key limiting factors in shinorine production. The study combines meta-analysis of 13C-metabolic flux analysis, GEMs, synthetic biology, CRISPRi-mediated gene downregulation, and omics analysis to improve shinorine production, demonstrating the potential of Pseudomonas putida KT2440 as platform for shinorine production.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian S Yunus
- Joint BioEnergy Institute, 5885 Hollis Street, Emeryville, CA, USA; Biological Systems & Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA.
| | - Graham A Hudson
- Joint BioEnergy Institute, 5885 Hollis Street, Emeryville, CA, USA; Biological Systems & Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA; California Institute of Quantitative Biosciences (QB3), University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Yan Chen
- Joint BioEnergy Institute, 5885 Hollis Street, Emeryville, CA, USA; Biological Systems & Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Jennifer W Gin
- Joint BioEnergy Institute, 5885 Hollis Street, Emeryville, CA, USA; Biological Systems & Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Joonhoon Kim
- Joint BioEnergy Institute, 5885 Hollis Street, Emeryville, CA, USA; Energy Processes & Materials Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA
| | - Edward E K Baidoo
- Joint BioEnergy Institute, 5885 Hollis Street, Emeryville, CA, USA; Biological Systems & Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Christopher J Petzold
- Joint BioEnergy Institute, 5885 Hollis Street, Emeryville, CA, USA; Biological Systems & Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Paul D Adams
- Joint BioEnergy Institute, 5885 Hollis Street, Emeryville, CA, USA; Molecular Biophysics & Integrated Bioimaging Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Blake A Simmons
- Joint BioEnergy Institute, 5885 Hollis Street, Emeryville, CA, USA; Biological Systems & Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Aindrila Mukhopadhyay
- Joint BioEnergy Institute, 5885 Hollis Street, Emeryville, CA, USA; Biological Systems & Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Jay D Keasling
- Joint BioEnergy Institute, 5885 Hollis Street, Emeryville, CA, USA; Biological Systems & Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA; California Institute of Quantitative Biosciences (QB3), University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA; Department of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA; Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA; Center for Biosustainability, Danish Technical University, Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Taek Soon Lee
- Joint BioEnergy Institute, 5885 Hollis Street, Emeryville, CA, USA; Biological Systems & Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tiwari R, Sathesh-Prabu C, Kim Y, Kuk Lee S. Simultaneous utilization of glucose and xylose by metabolically engineered Pseudomonas putida for the production of 3-hydroxypropionic acid. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY 2024; 395:130389. [PMID: 38295962 DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2024.130389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Revised: 01/07/2024] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 02/03/2024]
Abstract
Pseudomonas putida,a robust candidate for lignocellulosicbiomass-based biorefineries, encounters challenges in metabolizing xylose. In this study, Weimberg pathway was introduced intoP. putidaEM42 under a xylose-inducible promoter, resulting in slow cell growth (0.05 h-1) on xylose.Through adaptive laboratory evolution, an evolved strain exhibited highly enhanced growth on xylose (0.36 h-1), comparable to that on glucose (0.39 h-1). Whole genome sequencing identified four mutations, with two key mutations located inPP3380andPP2219. Reverse-engineered strain 8EM42_Xyl, harboring these two mutations, showed enhanced growth on xylose but co-utilizing glucose and xylose at a rate of 0.3 g/L/h. Furthermore, 8EM42_Xyl was employed for 3-hydroxypropionic acid (3HP) production from glucose and xylose by expressing malonyl-CoA reductase and acetyl-CoA carboxylase, yielding 29 g/L in fed-batch fermentation. Moreover, the engineered strain exhibited promising performance in 3HP production from empty palm fruit bunch hydrolysate, demonstrating its potential as a promising cell factory forbiorefineries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rameshwar Tiwari
- School of Energy and Chemical Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST), Ulsan, South Korea
| | - Chandran Sathesh-Prabu
- School of Energy and Chemical Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST), Ulsan, South Korea
| | - Yuchan Kim
- School of Energy and Chemical Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST), Ulsan, South Korea
| | - Sung Kuk Lee
- School of Energy and Chemical Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST), Ulsan, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tanaka K, Bamba T, Kondo A, Hasunuma T. Metabolomics-based development of bioproduction processes toward industrial-scale production. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2024; 85:103057. [PMID: 38154323 DOI: 10.1016/j.copbio.2023.103057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Revised: 12/04/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 12/30/2023]
Abstract
Microbial biomanufacturing offers a promising, environment-friendly platform for next-generation chemical production. However, its limited industrial implementation is attributed to the slow production rates of target compounds and the time-intensive engineering of high-yield strains. This review highlights how metabolomics expedites bioproduction development, as demonstrated through case studies of its integration into microbial strain engineering, culture optimization, and model construction. The Design-Build-Test-Learn (DBTL) cycle serves as a standard workflow for strain engineering. Process development, including the optimization of culture conditions and scale-up, is crucial for industrial production. In silico models facilitate the development of strains and processes. Metabolomics is a powerful driver of the DBTL framework, process development, and model construction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenya Tanaka
- Engineering Biology Research Center, Kobe University, 1-1 Rokkodai, Nada, Kobe 657-8501, Japan; Graduate School of Science, Technology and Innovation, Kobe University, 1-1 Rokkodai, Nada, Kobe 657-8501, Japan
| | - Takahiro Bamba
- Engineering Biology Research Center, Kobe University, 1-1 Rokkodai, Nada, Kobe 657-8501, Japan
| | - Akihiko Kondo
- Engineering Biology Research Center, Kobe University, 1-1 Rokkodai, Nada, Kobe 657-8501, Japan; Graduate School of Science, Technology and Innovation, Kobe University, 1-1 Rokkodai, Nada, Kobe 657-8501, Japan; RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science, 1-7-22 Suehiro-cho, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 230-0045, Japan
| | - Tomohisa Hasunuma
- Engineering Biology Research Center, Kobe University, 1-1 Rokkodai, Nada, Kobe 657-8501, Japan; Graduate School of Science, Technology and Innovation, Kobe University, 1-1 Rokkodai, Nada, Kobe 657-8501, Japan; RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science, 1-7-22 Suehiro-cho, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 230-0045, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Boob AG, Chen J, Zhao H. Enabling pathway design by multiplex experimentation and machine learning. Metab Eng 2024; 81:70-87. [PMID: 38040110 DOI: 10.1016/j.ymben.2023.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2023] [Revised: 11/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/25/2023] [Indexed: 12/03/2023]
Abstract
The remarkable metabolic diversity observed in nature has provided a foundation for sustainable production of a wide array of valuable molecules. However, transferring the biosynthetic pathway to the desired host often runs into inherent failures that arise from intermediate accumulation and reduced flux resulting from competing pathways within the host cell. Moreover, the conventional trial and error methods utilized in pathway optimization struggle to fully grasp the intricacies of installed pathways, leading to time-consuming and labor-intensive experiments, ultimately resulting in suboptimal yields. Considering these obstacles, there is a pressing need to explore the enzyme expression landscape and identify the optimal pathway configuration for enhanced production of molecules. This review delves into recent advancements in pathway engineering, with a focus on multiplex experimentation and machine learning techniques. These approaches play a pivotal role in overcoming the limitations of traditional methods, enabling exploration of a broader design space and increasing the likelihood of discovering optimal pathway configurations for enhanced production of molecules. We discuss several tools and strategies for pathway design, construction, and optimization for sustainable and cost-effective microbial production of molecules ranging from bulk to fine chemicals. We also highlight major successes in academia and industry through compelling case studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aashutosh Girish Boob
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, United States; Carl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, United States; DOE Center for Advanced Bioenergy and Bioproducts Innovation, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States
| | - Junyu Chen
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, United States; Carl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, United States; DOE Center for Advanced Bioenergy and Bioproducts Innovation, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States
| | - Huimin Zhao
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, United States; Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, United States; Carl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, United States; DOE Center for Advanced Bioenergy and Bioproducts Innovation, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States.
| |
Collapse
|