Bifunctional cross-linking approaches for mass spectrometry-based investigation of nucleic acids and protein-nucleic acid assemblies

Isotopic Depletion Increases the Spatial Resolution of FPOP Top-Down Mass Spectrometry Analysis

Protein radical labeling, like fast photochemical oxidation of proteins (FPOP), coupled to a top-down mass spectrometry (MS) analysis offers an alternative analytical method for probing protein structure or protein interaction with other biomolecules, for instance, proteins and DNA. However, with the increasing mass of studied analytes, the MS/MS spectra become complex and exhibit a low signal-to-noise ratio. Nevertheless, these difficulties may be overcome by protein isotope depletion. Thus, we aimed to use protein isotope depletion to analyze FPOP-oxidized samples by top-down MS analysis. For this purpose, we prepared isotopically natural (IN) and depleted (ID) forms of the FOXO4 DNA binding domain (FOXO4-DBD) and studied the protein-DNA interaction interface with double-stranded DNA, the insulin response element (IRE), after exposing the complex to hydroxyl radicals. As shown by comparing tandem mass spectra of natural and depleted proteins, the ID form increased the signal-to-noise ratio of useful fragment ions, thereby enhancing the sequence coverage by more than 19%. This improvement in the detection of fragment ions enabled us to detect 22 more oxidized residues in the ID samples than in the IN sample. Moreover, less common modifications were detected in the ID sample, including the formation of ketones and lysine carbonylation. Given the higher quality of ID top-down MSMS data set, these results provide more detailed information on the complex formation between transcription factors and DNA-response elements. Therefore, our study highlights the benefits of isotopic depletion for quantitative top-down proteomics. Data are available via ProteomeXchange with the identifier PXD044447.

The multifaceted roles of mass spectrometric analysis in nucleic acids drug discovery and development

The deceptively simple concepts of mass determination and fragment analysis are the basis for the application of mass spectrometry (MS) to a boundless range of analytes, including fundamental components and polymeric forms of nucleic acids (NAs). This platform affords the intrinsic ability to observe first-hand the effects of NA-active drugs on the chemical structure, composition, and conformation of their targets, which might affect their ability to interact with cognate NAs, proteins, and other biomolecules present in a natural environment. The possibility of interfacing with high-performance separation techniques represents a multiplying factor that extends these capabilities to cover complex sample mixtures obtained from organisms that were exposed to NA-active drugs. This report provides a brief overview of these capabilities in the context of the analysis of the products of NA-drug activity and NA therapeutics. The selected examples offer proof-of-principle of the applicability of this platform to all phases of the journey undertaken by any successful NA drug from laboratory to bedside, and provide the rationale for its rapid expansion outside traditional laboratory settings in support to ever growing manufacturing operations.

Protein-RNA interactions: from mass spectrometry to drug discovery

Proteins and RNAs are fundamental parts of biological systems, and their interactions affect many essential cellular processes. Therefore, it is crucial to understand at a molecular and at a systems level how proteins and RNAs form complexes and mutually affect their functions. In the present mini-review, we will first provide an overview of different mass spectrometry (MS)-based methods to study the RNA-binding proteome (RBPome), most of which are based on photochemical cross-linking. As we will show, some of these methods are also able to provide higher-resolution information about binding sites, which are important for the structural characterisation of protein-RNA interactions. In addition, classical structural biology techniques such as nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and biophysical methods such as electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy and fluorescence-based methods contribute to a detailed understanding of the interactions between these two classes of biomolecules. We will discuss the relevance of such interactions in the context of the formation of membrane-less organelles (MLOs) by liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) processes and their emerging importance as targets for drug discovery.

RNA Chemical Labeling with Site-Specific, Relative Quantification by Mass Spectrometry for the Structural Study of a Neomycin-Sensing Riboswitch Aptamer Domain

High-resolution mass spectrometry was used for the label-free, direct localization and relative quantification of CMC⁺ -modifications of a neomycin-sensing riboswitch aptamer domain in the absence and presence of the aminoglycoside ligands neomycin B, ribostamycin, and paromomycin. The chemical probing and MS data for the free riboswitch show high exposure to solvent of the uridine nucleobases U7, U8, U13, U14, U18 as part of the proposed internal and apical loops, but those of U10 and U21 as part of the proposed internal loop were found to be far less exposed than expected. Thus, our data are in better agreement with the proposed secondary structure of the riboswitch in complexes with aminoglycosides than with that of free RNA. For the riboswitch in complexes with neomycin B, ribostamycin, and paromomycin, we found highly similar CMC⁺ -modification patterns and excellent agreement with previous NMR studies. Differences between the chemical probing and MS data in the absence and presence of the aminoglycoside ligands were quantitative rather than qualitative (i. e., the same nucleobases were labeled, but to different extents) and can be rationalized by stabilization of both the proposed bulge and the apical loop by aminoglycoside binding. Our study shows that chemical probing and mass spectrometry can provide important structural information and complement other techniques such as NMR spectroscopy.

Mass Spectrometry of Nucleic Acid Noncovalent Complexes

Nucleic acids have been among the first targets for antitumor drugs and antibiotics. With the unveiling of new biological roles in regulation of gene expression, specific DNA and RNA structures have become very attractive targets, especially when the corresponding proteins are undruggable. Biophysical assays to assess target structure as well as ligand binding stoichiometry, affinity, specificity, and binding modes are part of the drug development process. Mass spectrometry offers unique advantages as a biophysical method owing to its ability to distinguish each stoichiometry present in a mixture. In addition, advanced mass spectrometry approaches (reactive probing, fragmentation techniques, ion mobility spectrometry, ion spectroscopy) provide more detailed information on the complexes. Here, we review the fundamentals of mass spectrometry and all its particularities when studying noncovalent nucleic acid structures, and then review what has been learned thanks to mass spectrometry on nucleic acid structures, self-assemblies (e.g., duplexes or G-quadruplexes), and their complexes with ligands.

B-CePs as cross-linking probes for the investigation of RNA higher-order structure

Elucidating the structure of RNA and RNA ensembles is essential to understand biological functions. In this work, we explored the previously uncharted reactivity of bis-chloropiperidines (B-CePs) towards RNA. We characterized at the molecular level the different adducts induced by the fast reacting compound B-CeP 1 with RNA. Following an approach based on solution thermal melting coupled with ESI mass spectrometry (STHEM-ESI), we proved the ability of B-CePs to induce inter-molecular cross-links between guanines in double stranded RNA. These results open the possibility of using B-CePs as structural probes for investigating higher-order structures, such as the kissing loop complex established by the dimerization initiation site (DIS) of the HIV-1 genome. We confirmed the potential of B-CePs to reveal the identity of RNA structures involved in long-range interactions, expecting to benefit the characterization of samples that are not readily amenable to traditional high-resolution techniques, and thus promoting the elucidation of pertinent RNA systems associated with old and new diseases.

MS-Based Approaches Enable the Structural Characterization of Transcription Factor/DNA Response Element Complex

The limited information available on the structure of complexes involving transcription factors and cognate DNA response elements represents a major obstacle in the quest to understand their mechanism of action at the molecular level. We implemented a concerted structural proteomics approach, which combined hydrogen-deuterium exchange (HDX), quantitative protein-protein and protein-nucleic acid cross-linking (XL), and homology analysis, to model the structure of the complex between the full-length DNA binding domain (DBD) of Forkhead box protein O4 (FOXO4) and its DNA binding element (DBE). The results confirmed that FOXO4-DBD assumes the characteristic forkhead topology shared by these types of transcription factors, but its binding mode differs significantly from those of other members of the family. The results showed that the binding interaction stabilized regions that were rather flexible and disordered in the unbound form. Surprisingly, the conformational effects were not limited only to the interface between bound components, but extended also to distal regions that may be essential to recruiting additional factors to the transcription machinery. In addition to providing valuable new insights into the binding mechanism, this project provided an excellent evaluation of the merits of structural proteomics approaches in the investigation of systems that are not directly amenable to traditional high-resolution techniques.

Next Generation Techniques for Determination of Protein-Protein Interactions: Beyond the Crystal Structure

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We discuss recent advancements in structural biology methods for investigating sites of protein-protein interactions. We will inform readers outside the field of structural biology about techniques beyond crystallography, and how these different technologies can be utilized for drug development.

RECENT FINDINGS

Advancements in cryo-electron microscopy (cryoEM) and micro-electron diffraction (microED) may change how we view atomic resolution structural biology, such that well-ordered macrocrystals of protein complexes are not required for interface identification. However, some drug discovery applications, such as lead peptide compound generation, may not require atomic resolution; mass spectrometry techniques can provide an expedited path to generation of lead compounds. New crosslinking compounds, more user-friendly data analysis, and novel protocols such as protein painting can advance drug discovery programs, even in the absence of atomic resolution structural data. Finally, artificial intelligence and machine learning methods, while never truly replacing experimental methods, may provide rational ways to stratify potential druggable regions identified with mass spectrometry into higher and lower priority candidates.

SUMMARY

Electron diffraction of nanocrystals combines the benefits of both x-ray diffraction and cryoEM, and may prove to be the next generation of atomic resolution protein-protein interface identification. However, in situations such as peptide drug discovery, mass spectrometry techniques supported by advancements in computational methods will likely prove sufficient to support drug discovery efforts. In addition, these methods can be significantly faster than any crystallographic or cryoEM methods for identification of interacting regions.

Structural mass spectrometry goes viral

Over the last 20 years, mass spectrometry (MS), with its ability to analyze small sample amounts with high speed and sensitivity, has more and more entered the field of structural virology, aiming to investigate the structure and dynamics of viral proteins as close to their native environment as possible. The use of non-perturbing labels in hydrogen-deuterium exchange MS allows for the analysis of interactions between viral proteins and host cell factors as well as their dynamic responses to the environment. Cross-linking MS, on the other hand, can analyze interactions in viral protein complexes and identify virus-host interactions in cells. Native MS allows transferring viral proteins, complexes and capsids into the gas phase and has broken boundaries to overcome size limitations, so that now even the analysis of intact virions is possible. Different MS approaches not only inform about size, stability, interactions and dynamics of virus assemblies, but also bridge the gap to other biophysical techniques, providing valuable constraints for integrative structural modeling of viral complex assemblies that are often inaccessible by single technique approaches. In this review, recent advances are highlighted, clearly showing that structural MS approaches in virology are moving towards systems biology and ever more experiments are performed on cellular level.

Furan Cross-Linking Technology for Investigating GPCR-Ligand Interactions

Interactions between G protein-coupled receptors and their ligands hold extensive potential for drug discovery. Studying these interactions poses technical problems due to their transient nature and the inherent difficulties when working with G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) that are only functional in a membrane setting. Here, we describe the use of a furan-based chemical cross-linking methodology to achieve selective covalent coupling between a furan-modified peptide ligand and its native GPCR present on the surface of living cells under normal cell culture conditions. This methodology relies on the oxidation of the furan moiety, which can be achieved by either addition of an external oxidation signal or by the reactive oxygen species produced by the cell. The cross-linked ligand-GPCR complex is subsequently detected by Western blotting based on the biotin label that is incorporated in the peptide ligand.