Peptidic transition state analogues as PRMT inhibitors

Overview of the development of protein arginine methyltransferase modulators: Achievements and future directions

Protein methylation is a post-translational modification (PTM) that organisms undergo. This process is considered a part of epigenetics research. In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in protein methylation, particularly histone methylation, as research has advanced. Methylation of histones is a dynamic process that is subject to fine control by histone methyltransferases and demethylases. In addition, many non-histone proteins also undergo methylation, and these modifications collectively regulate physiological phenomena, including RNA transcription, translation, signal transduction, DNA damage response, and cell cycle. Protein arginine methylation is a crucial aspect of protein methylation, which plays a significant role in regulating the cell cycle and repairing DNA. It is also linked to various diseases. Therefore, protein arginine methyltransferases (PRMTs) that are involved in this process have gained considerable attention as a potential therapeutic target for treating diseases. Several PRMT inhibitors are in phase I/II clinical trials. This paper aims to introduce the structure, biochemical functions, and bioactivity assays of PRMTs. Additionally, we will review the structure-function of currently popular PRMT inhibitors. Through the analysis of various data on known PRMT inhibitors, we hope to provide valuable assistance for future drug design and development.

Critical Roles of Protein Arginine Methylation in the Central Nervous System

A remarkable post-transitional modification of both histones and non-histone proteins is arginine methylation. Methylation of arginine residues is crucial for a wide range of cellular process, including signal transduction, DNA repair, gene expression, mRNA splicing, and protein interaction. Arginine methylation is modulated by arginine methyltransferases and demethylases, like protein arginine methyltransferase (PRMTs) and Jumonji C (JmjC) domain containing (JMJD) proteins. Symmetric dimethylarginine and asymmetric dimethylarginine, metabolic products of the PRMTs and JMJD proteins, can be changed by abnormal expression of these proteins. Many pathologies including cancer, inflammation and immune responses have been closely linked to aberrant arginine methylation. Currently, the majority of the literature discusses the substrate specificity and function of arginine methylation in the pathogenesis and prognosis of cancers. Numerous investigations on the roles of arginine methylation in the central nervous system (CNS) have so far been conducted. In this review, we display the biochemistry of arginine methylation and provide an overview of the regulatory mechanism of arginine methyltransferases and demethylases. We also highlight physiological functions of arginine methylation in the CNS and the significance of arginine methylation in a variety of neurological diseases such as brain cancers, neurodegenerative diseases and neurodevelopmental disorders. Furthermore, we summarize PRMT inhibitors and molecular functions of arginine methylation. Finally, we pose important questions that require further research to comprehend the roles of arginine methylation in the CNS and discover more effective targets for the treatment of neurological diseases.

New Insights into the Cooperativity and Dynamics of Dimeric Enzymes

A survey of protein databases indicates that the majority of enzymes exist in oligomeric forms, with about half of those found in the UniProt database being homodimeric. Understanding why many enzymes are in their dimeric form is imperative. Recent developments in experimental and computational techniques have allowed for a deeper comprehension of the cooperative interactions between the subunits of dimeric enzymes. This review aims to succinctly summarize these recent advancements by providing an overview of experimental and theoretical methods, as well as an understanding of cooperativity in substrate binding and the molecular mechanisms of cooperative catalysis within homodimeric enzymes. Focus is set upon the beneficial effects of dimerization and cooperative catalysis. These advancements not only provide essential case studies and theoretical support for comprehending dimeric enzyme catalysis but also serve as a foundation for designing highly efficient catalysts, such as dimeric organic catalysts. Moreover, these developments have significant implications for drug design, as exemplified by Paxlovid, which was designed for the homodimeric main protease of SARS-CoV-2.

Conjugates of adenosine mimetics and arginine-rich peptides serve as inhibitors and fluorescent probes but not as long-lifetime photoluminescent probes for protein arginine methyltransferases

The conjugates of an adenosine mimetic and oligo-l-arginine or oligo-d-arginine (ARCs) were initially designed in our research group as inhibitors and photoluminescent probes targeting basophilic protein kinases. Here, we explored a panel of ARCs and their fluorescent derivatives in biochemical assays with members of the protein arginine methyltransferase (PRMT) family, focusing specifically on PRMT1. In the binding/displacement assay with detection of fluorescence anisotropy, we found that ARCs and arginine-rich peptides could serve as high-affinity ligands for PRMT1, whereas the equilibrium dissociation constant values depended dramatically on the number of arginine residues within the compounds. The fluorescently labeled probe ARC-1081 was displaced from its complex with PRMT1 by both S-adenosyl-l-methionine (SAM) and S-adenosyl-l-homocysteine (SAH), indicating binding of the adenosine mimetic of ARCs to the SAM/SAH-binding site within PRMT1. The ARCs that had previously shown microsecond-lifetime photoluminescence in complex with protein kinases did not feature such property in complex with PRMT1, demonstrating the selectivity of the time-resolved readout format. When tested against a panel of PRMT family members in single-dose inhibition experiments, a micromolar concentration of ARC-902 was required for the inhibition of PRMT1 and PRMT7. Overall, our results suggest that the compounds containing multiple arginine residues (including the well-known cell-penetrating peptides) are likely to inhibit PRMT and thus interfere with the epigenetic modification status in complex biological systems, which should be taken into consideration during interpretation of the experimental data.

A peptoid-based inhibitor of protein arginine methyltransferase 1 (PRMT1) induces apoptosis and autophagy in cancer cells

Protein arginine methyltransferases (PRMTs) are S-adenosylmethionine-dependent enzymes that transfer a methyl group to arginine residues within proteins, most notably histones. The nine characterized PRMT family members are divided into three types depending on the resulting methylated product: asymmetric dimethylarginine (Type I PRMT), symmetric dimethylarginine (Type II PRMT), or monomethylated arginine (Type III PRMT). In some cancers, the resulting product can lead to either increased or decreased transcription of cancer-related genes, suggesting PRMT family members may be valid therapeutic targets. Traditionally, peptide-based compounds have been employed to target this family of enzymes, which has resulted in multiple tool and lead compounds being developed. However, peptide-based therapeutics suffer from poor stability and short half-lives, as proteases can render them useless by hydrolytic degradation. Conversely, peptoids, which are peptide-mimetics composed of N-substituted glycine monomers, are less susceptible to hydrolysis, resulting in improved stability and longer half-lives. Herein, we report the development of a bioavailable, peptoid-based PRMT1 inhibitor that induces cell death in MDA468 and HCT116 cancer cell lines while not exhibiting any significant impact on nontumorigenic HepaRG or normal human mammary epithelial cells. Furthermore, the inhibitor described herein appears to induce both apoptosis and autophagy, suggesting it may be a less toxic cytostatic agent. In conclusion, we propose this peptoid-based inhibitor has significant anticancer and therapeutic potential by reducing cell viability, growth, and size in breast and colon cancer. Further experimentation will help determine the mechanism of action and downstream effects of this compound.

Structural Studies Provide New Insights into the Role of Lysine Acetylation on Substrate Recognition by CARM1 and Inform the Design of Potent Peptidomimetic Inhibitors

The dynamic interplay of post‐translational modifications (PTMs) in chromatin provides a communication system for the regulation of gene expression. An increasing number of studies have highlighted the role that such crosstalk between PTMs plays in chromatin recognition. In this study, (bio)chemical and structural approaches were applied to specifically probe the impact of acetylation of Lys¹⁸ in the histone H3 tail peptide on peptide recognition by the protein methyltransferase coactivator‐associated arginine methyltransferase 1 (CARM1). Peptidomimetics that recapitulate the transition state of protein arginine N‐methyltransferases, were designed based on the H3 peptide wherein the target Arg¹⁷ was flanked by either a free or an acetylated lysine. Structural studies with these peptidomimetics and the catalytic domain of CARM1 provide new insights into the binding of the H3 peptide within the enzyme active site. While the co‐crystal structures reveal that lysine acetylation results in minor conformational differences for both CARM1 and the H3 peptide, acetylation of Lys¹⁸ does lead to additional interactions (Van der Waals and hydrogen bonding) and likely reduces the cost of desolvation upon binding, resulting in increased affinity. Informed by these findings a series of smaller peptidomimetics were also prepared and found to maintain potent and selective CARM1 inhibition. These findings provide new insights both into the mechanism of crosstalk between arginine methylation and lysine acetylation as well as towards the development of peptidomimetic CARM1 inhibitors.

Systematic investigation of PRMT6 substrate recognition reveals broad specificity with a preference for an RG motif or basic and bulky residues

Protein arginine methyltransferase 6 (PRMT6) catalyses the asymmetric dimethylation of arginines on numerous substrate proteins within the human cell. In particular, PRMT6 methylates histone H3 arginine 2 (H3R2) which affects both gene repression and activation. However, the substrate specificity of PRMT6 has not been comprehensively analysed. Here, we systematically characterise the substrate recognition motif of PRMT6, finding that it has broad specificity and recognises the RG motif. Working with a H3 tail peptide as a template, on which we made 204 amino acid substitutions, we use targeted mass spectrometry to measure their effect on PRMT6 in vitro activity. We first show that PRMT6 methylates R2 and R8 in the H3 peptide, although H3R8 is methylated with lower efficiency and is not an in vivo PRMT6 substrate. We then quantify the effect of 194 of these amino acid substitutions on methylation at both H3R2 and H3R8. In both cases, we find that PRMT6 tolerates essentially any amino acid substitution in the H3 peptide, but that positively charged and bulky residues are preferred near the target arginine. We show that PRMT6 also has preference for glycine, but only in the position immediately following the target arginine. This indicates that PRMT6 recognises the RG motif rather than the RGG motif. We further confirm this preference for the RG motif on another PRMT6 substrate, histone H4R3. This broad specificity and recognition of RG rather than RGG are distinctive among the PRMT family and has implications for the development of drugs to selectively target PRMT6. DATABASES: Panorama Public (https://panoramaweb.org/PRMT6motif.url); ProteomeXchange (PXD016711).

Genetic evidence for partial redundancy between the arginine methyltransferases CARM1 and PRMT6

CARM1 is a protein arginine methyltransferase (PRMT) that acts as a coactivator in a number of transcriptional programs. CARM1 orchestrates this coactivator activity in part by depositing the H3R17me2a histone mark in the vicinity of gene promoters that it regulates. However, the gross levels of H3R17me2a in CARM1 KO mice did not significantly decrease, indicating that other PRMT(s) may compensate for this loss. We thus performed a screen of type I PRMTs, which revealed that PRMT6 can also deposit the H3R17me2a mark in vitro CARM1 knockout mice are perinatally lethal and display a reduced fetal size, whereas PRMT6 null mice are viable, which permits the generation of double knockouts. Embryos that are null for both CARM1 and PRMT6 are noticeably smaller than CARM1 null embryos, providing in vivo evidence of redundancy. Mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) from the double knockout embryos display an absence of the H3R17me2a mark during mitosis and increased signs of DNA damage. Moreover, using the combination of CARM1 and PRMT6 inhibitors suppresses the cell proliferation of WT MEFs, suggesting a synergistic effect between CARM1 and PRMT6 inhibitions. These studies provide direct evidence that PRMT6 also deposits the H3R17me2a mark and acts redundantly with CARM1.