Genetic counseling considerations in cerebral palsy

Potential clinical applications of advanced genomic analysis in cerebral palsy

Cerebral palsy (CP) has historically been attributed to acquired insults, but emerging research suggests that genetic variations are also important causes of CP. While microarray and whole-exome sequencing based studies have been the primary methods for establishing new CP-gene relationships and providing a genetic etiology for individual patients, the cause of their condition remains unknown for many patients with CP. Recent advancements in genomic technologies offer additional opportunities to uncover variations in human genomes, transcriptomes, and epigenomes that have previously escaped detection. In this review, we outline the use of these state-of-the-art technologies to address the molecular diagnostic challenges experienced by individuals with CP. We also explore the importance of identifying a molecular etiology whenever possible, given the potential for genomic medicine to provide opportunities to treat patients with CP in new and more precise ways.

Redefining cerebral palsies as a diverse group of neurodevelopmental disorders with genetic aetiology

Cerebral palsy is a clinical descriptor covering a diverse group of permanent, non-degenerative disorders of motor function. Around one-third of cases have now been shown to have an underlying genetic aetiology, with the genetic landscape overlapping with those of neurodevelopmental disorders including intellectual disability, epilepsy, speech and language disorders and autism. Here we review the current state of genomic testing in cerebral palsy, highlighting the benefits for personalized medicine and the imperative to consider aetiology during clinical diagnosis. With earlier clinical diagnosis now possible, we emphasize the opportunity for comprehensive and early genomic testing as a crucial component of the routine diagnostic work-up in people with cerebral palsy.

Diagnostic Yield of Exome Sequencing in Cerebral Palsy and Implications for Genetic Testing Guidelines: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Importance

Exome sequencing is a first-tier diagnostic test for individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders, including intellectual disability/developmental delay and autism spectrum disorder; however, this recommendation does not include cerebral palsy.

Objective

To evaluate if the diagnostic yield of exome or genome sequencing in cerebral palsy is similar to that of other neurodevelopmental disorders.

Data Sources

The study team searched PubMed for studies published between 2013 and 2022 using cerebral palsy and genetic testing terms. Data were analyzed during March 2022.

Study Selection

Studies performing exome or genome sequencing in at least 10 participants with cerebral palsy were included. Studies with fewer than 10 individuals and studies reporting variants detected by other genetic tests were excluded. Consensus review was performed. The initial search identified 148 studies, of which 13 met inclusion criteria.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Data were extracted by 2 investigators and pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis. Incidence rates with corresponding 95% CIs and prediction intervals were calculated. Publication bias was evaluated by the Egger test. Variability between included studies was assessed via heterogeneity tests using the I2 statistic.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was the pooled diagnostic yield (rate of pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants) across studies. Subgroup analyses were performed based on population age and on the use of exclusion criteria for patient selection.

Results

Thirteen studies were included consisting of 2612 individuals with cerebral palsy. The overall diagnostic yield was 31.1% (95% CI, 24.2%-38.6%; I2 = 91%). The yield was higher in pediatric populations (34.8%; 95% CI, 28.3%-41.5%) than adult populations (26.9%; 95% CI, 1.2%-68.8%) and higher among studies that used exclusion criteria for patient selection (42.1%; 95% CI, 36.0%-48.2%) than those that did not (20.7%; 95% CI, 12.3%-30.5%).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the genetic diagnostic yield in cerebral palsy was similar to that of other neurodevelopmental disorders for which exome sequencing is recommended as standard of care. Data from this meta-analysis provide evidence to support the inclusion of cerebral palsy in the current recommendation of exome sequencing in the diagnostic evaluation of individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders.