1
|
Kruse GR, Percac-Lima S, Barber-Dubois M, Davies ME, Gundersen DA, Ho O, Mascioli L, Munshi M, Perry S, Singh D, Thomas A, Emmons KM, Haas JS. Bundling Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach with Screening for Social Risk in Federally Qualified Health Centers: A Stepped-Wedge Implementation-Effectiveness Study. J Gen Intern Med 2024; 39:1188-1195. [PMID: 38332440 PMCID: PMC11116362 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-024-08654-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bundling is combining individual interventions to meet quality metrics. Bundling offers of cancer screening with screening for social determinants of health (SDOH) may enable health centers to assist patients with social risks and yield efficiencies. OBJECTIVE To measure effects of bundling fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) and SDOH screening in federally qualified health centers (FQHCs). DESIGN Clustered stepped-wedge trial. PARTICIPANTS Four Massachusetts FQHCs randomized to implement bundled FIT-SDOH over 8-week "steps." INTERVENTION Outreach to 50-75-year-olds overdue for CRC screening to offer FIT with SDOH screening. The implementation strategy used facilitation and training for data monitoring and reporting. MAIN MEASURES Implementation process descriptions, data from facilitation meetings, and CRC and SDOH screening rates. Rates were compared between implementation and control FQHCs in each "step" by fitting generalized linear mixed-effects models with random intercepts for FQHCs, patients, and "step" by FQHC. KEY RESULTS FQHCs tailored implementation processes to their infrastructure, workflows, and staffing and prioritized different groups for outreach. Two FQHCs used population health outreach, and two integrated FIT-SDOH within established programs, such as pre-visit planning. Of 34,588 patients overdue for CRC screening, 54% were female; 20% Black, 11% Latino, 10% Asian, and 47% white; 32% had Medicaid, 16% Medicare, 32% private insurance, and 11% uninsured. Odds of CRC screening completion in implementation "steps" compared to controls were higher overall and among groups prioritized for outreach (overall: adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.41, p = 0.005; prioritized: aOR 2.88, p = 0.002). Odds of SDOH screening did not differ across "steps." CONCLUSIONS As healthcare systems are required to conduct more screenings, it is notable that outreach for a long-standing cancer screening requirement increased screening, even when bundled with a newer screening requirement. This outreach was feasible in a real-world safety-net clinical population and may conserve resources, especially compared to more complex or intensive outreach strategies. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NCT04585919.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gina R Kruse
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
| | - Sanja Percac-Lima
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Madeline E Davies
- Kraft Center for Community Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Daniel A Gundersen
- Survey and Qualitative Methods Core, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Oanh Ho
- Harbor Health Services, Inc., Mattapan, MA, USA
| | - Lynette Mascioli
- Massachusetts League of Community Health Centers, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mehezbin Munshi
- Massachusetts League of Community Health Centers, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sarah Perry
- Harbor Health Services, Inc., Mattapan, MA, USA
| | - Deepinder Singh
- Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
| | | | - Karen M Emmons
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jennifer S Haas
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Belon AP, McKenzie E, Teare G, Nykiforuk CIJ, Nieuwendyk L, Kim MO, Lee B, Adhikari K. Effective strategies for Fecal Immunochemical Tests (FIT) programs to improve colorectal cancer screening uptake among populations with limited access to the healthcare system: a rapid review. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:128. [PMID: 38263112 PMCID: PMC10807065 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10573-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/06/2024] [Indexed: 01/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the leading causes of cancer death globally. CRC screening can reduce the incidence and mortality of CRC. However, socially disadvantaged groups may disproportionately benefit less from screening programs due to their limited access to healthcare. This poor access to healthcare services is further aggravated by intersecting, cumulative social factors associated with their sociocultural background and living conditions. This rapid review systematically reviewed and synthesized evidence on the effectiveness of Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) programs in increasing CRC screening in populations who do not have a regular healthcare provider or who have limited healthcare system access. METHODS We used three databases: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and EBSCOhost CINAHL. We searched for systematic reviews, meta-analysis, and quantitative and mixed-methods studies focusing on effectiveness of FIT programs (request or receipt of FIT kit, completion rates of FIT screening, and participation rates in follow-up colonoscopy after FIT positive results). For evidence synthesis, deductive and inductive thematic analysis was conducted. The findings were also classified using the Cochrane Methods Equity PROGRESS-PLUS framework. The quality of the included studies was assessed. RESULTS Findings from the 25 included primary studies were organized into three intervention design-focused themes. Delivery of culturally-tailored programs (e.g., use of language and interpretive services) were effective in increasing CRC screening. Regarding the method of delivery for FIT, specific strategies combined with mail-out programs (e.g., motivational screening letter) or in-person delivery (e.g., demonstration of FIT specimen collection procedure) enhanced the success of FIT programs. The follow-up reminder theme (e.g., spaced out and live reminders) were generally effective. Additionally, we found evidence of the social determinants of health affecting FIT uptake (e.g., place of residence, race/ethnicity/culture/language, gender and/or sex). CONCLUSIONS Findings from this rapid review suggest multicomponent interventions combined with tailored strategies addressing the diverse, unique needs and priorities of the population with no regular healthcare provider or limited access to the healthcare system may be more effective in increasing FIT screening. Decision-makers and practitioners should consider equity and social factors when developing resources and coordinating efforts in the delivery and implementation of FIT screening strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Paula Belon
- Centre for Healthy Communities, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Emily McKenzie
- Provincial Population and Public Health, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cummings School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
- Health Evidence and Impact, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada
| | - Gary Teare
- Provincial Population and Public Health, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cummings School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Candace I J Nykiforuk
- Centre for Healthy Communities, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Laura Nieuwendyk
- Centre for Healthy Communities, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Minji Olivia Kim
- Centre for Healthy Communities, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Bernice Lee
- Centre for Healthy Communities, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Kamala Adhikari
- Provincial Population and Public Health, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada.
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cummings School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kemper KE, Glaze BL, Eastman CL, Waldron RC, Hoover S, Flagg T, Tangka FKL, Subramanian S. Effectiveness and cost of multilayered colorectal cancer screening promotion interventions at federally qualified health centers in Washington State. Cancer 2018; 124:4121-4129. [PMID: 30359468 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2018] [Revised: 05/25/2018] [Accepted: 06/15/2018] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It has been demonstrated that fecal immunochemical test (FIT) mailing programs are effective for increasing colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. The objectives of the current study were to assess the magnitude of uptake that could be achieved with a mailed FIT program in a federally qualified health center and whether such a program can be implemented at a reasonable cost to support sustainability. METHODS The Washington State Department of Health's partner HealthPoint implemented a direct-mail FIT program at 9 medical clinics, along with a follow-up reminder letter and automated telephone calls to those not up-to-date with recommended screening. Supplemental outreach events at selected medical clinics and a 50th birthday card screening reminder program also were implemented. The authors collected and analyzed process, effectiveness, and cost measures and conducted a systematic assessment of the short-term cost effectiveness of the interventions. RESULTS Overall, 5178 FIT kits were mailed with 4009 follow-up reminder letters, and 8454 automated reminder telephone calls were made over 12 months. In total, 1607 FIT kits were returned within 3 months of the end of the implementation period: an overall return rate of 31% for the mailed FIT program. The average total intervention cost per FIT kit returned was $39.81, and the intervention implementation cost per kit returned was $18.76. CONCLUSIONS The mailed FIT intervention improved CRC screening uptake among HealthPoint's patient population. This intervention was implemented for less than $40 per individual successfully screened. The findings and lessons learned can assist other clinics that serve disadvantaged populations to increase their CRC screening adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Sonja Hoover
- RTI International, Waltham, Massachusetts, North Carolina
| | - T'Ronda Flagg
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Florence K L Tangka
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Weiss JM, Pandhi N, Kraft S, Potvien A, Carayon P, Smith MA. Primary care colorectal cancer screening correlates with breast cancer screening: implications for colorectal cancer screening improvement interventions. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 2018; 9:148. [PMID: 29691364 PMCID: PMC5915383 DOI: 10.1038/s41424-018-0014-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2017] [Revised: 01/18/2018] [Accepted: 02/13/2018] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective National colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates have plateaued. To optimize interventions targeting those unscreened, a better understanding is needed of how this preventive service fits in with multiple preventive and chronic care needs managed by primary care providers (PCPs). This study examines whether PCP practices of other preventive and chronic care needs correlate with CRC screening. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study of 90 PCPs and 33,137 CRC screening-eligible patients. Five PCP quality metrics (breast cancer screening, cervical cancer screening, HgbA1c and LDL testing, and blood pressure control) were measured. A baseline correlation test was performed between these metrics and PCP CRC screening rates. Multivariable logistic regression with clustering at the clinic-level estimated odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for these PCP quality metrics, patient and PCP characteristics, and their relationship to CRC screening. Results PCP CRC screening rates have a strong correlation with breast cancer screening rates (r = 0.7414, p < 0.001) and a weak correlation with the other quality metrics. In the final adjusted model, the only PCP quality metric that significantly predicted CRC screening was breast cancer screening (OR 1.25; 95% CI 1.11–1.42; p < 0.001). Conclusions PCP CRC screening rates are highly concordant with breast cancer screening. CRC screening is weakly concordant with cervical cancer screening and chronic disease management metrics. Efforts targeting PCPs to increase CRC screening rates could be bundled with breast cancer screening improvement interventions to increase their impact and success.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer M Weiss
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA. .,Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA. .,University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI, USA.
| | - Nancy Pandhi
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Sally Kraft
- VP Population Health, Dartmouth-Hitchcock, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Aaron Potvien
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Pascale Carayon
- Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Maureen A Smith
- University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI, USA.,Department of Family Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.,Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.,Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Davis MM, Renfro S, Pham R, Hassmiller Lich K, Shannon J, Coronado GD, Wheeler SB. Geographic and population-level disparities in colorectal cancer testing: A multilevel analysis of Medicaid and commercial claims data. Prev Med 2017; 101:44-52. [PMID: 28506715 PMCID: PMC6067672 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2016] [Revised: 04/25/2017] [Accepted: 05/07/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Morbidity and mortality from colorectal cancer (CRC) can be attenuated through guideline concordant screening and intervention. This study used Medicaid and commercial claims data to examine individual and geographic factors associated with CRC testing rates in one state (Oregon). A total of 64,711 beneficiaries (4516 Medicaid; 60,195 Commercial) became newly age-eligible for CRC screening and met inclusion criteria (e.g., continuously enrolled, no prior history) during the study period (January 2010-December 2013). We estimated multilevel models to examine predictors for CRC testing, including individual (e.g., gender, insurance, rurality, access to care, distance to endoscopy facility) and geographic factors at the county level (e.g., poverty, uninsurance). Despite insurance coverage, only two out of five (42%) beneficiaries had evidence of CRC testing during the four year study window. CRC testing varied from 22.4% to 46.8% across Oregon's 36 counties; counties with higher levels of socioeconomic deprivation had lower levels of testing. After controlling for age, beneficiaries had greater odds of receiving CRC testing if they were female (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.08), commercially insured, or urban residents (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.07-1.21). Accessing primary care (OR 2.47, 95% CI 2.37-2.57), but not distance to endoscopy (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.92-1.03) was associated with testing. CRC testing in newly age-eligible Medicaid and commercial members remains markedly low. Disparities exist by gender, geographic residence, insurance coverage, and access to primary care. Work remains to increase CRC testing to acceptable levels, and to select and implement interventions targeting the counties and populations in greatest need.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melinda M Davis
- Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States; Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States; OHSU-PSU School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States.
| | - Stephanie Renfro
- Center for Health Systems Effectiveness, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States.
| | - Robyn Pham
- Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States.
| | - Kristen Hassmiller Lich
- Department of Health Policy & Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
| | - Jackilen Shannon
- OHSU-PSU School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States.
| | - Gloria D Coronado
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, Portland, OR, United States.
| | - Stephanie B Wheeler
- Department of Health Policy & Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States; Center for Health Promotion & Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Costas-Muñiz R, Jandorf L, Philip E, Cohen N, Villagra C, Sriphanlop P, Schofield E, DuHamel K. Examining the Impact of Latino Nativity, Migration, and Acculturation Factors on Colonoscopy Screening. J Community Health 2016; 41:903-9. [PMID: 26898818 PMCID: PMC5245176 DOI: 10.1007/s10900-016-0168-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Latinos are a diverse population comprised of multiple countries of origin with varying cultural profiles. This study examines differences in colonoscopy completion across place of birth and migration-related factors in a sample of predominantly Dominican and Puerto Rican Latinos living in New York City after receiving a recommendation for colonoscopy screening and navigation services. The sample included 702 Latinos recruited for two cancer screening projects targeting Latinos eligible for colonoscopy who seek healthcare in New York City. Participants completed a survey that included sociodemographic, health-related questions, psychosocial assessments and cancer screening practices, in Spanish or English. Migration, acculturation, and language factors were found to predict colonoscopy completion. The results indicated that Latinos born in the Dominican Republic and Central America were more likely to complete a screening colonoscopy than their counterparts born in the US. Further, those who emigrated at an older age, who have resided in the US for less than 20 years, preferred Spanish and those with lower US acculturation levels were also more likely to complete a screening colonoscopy. The findings suggest that Latinos who are less acculturated to the US are more likely to complete a screening colonoscopy after receiving a physician recommendation for colonoscopy screening. The results provide important information that can inform clinical practice and public health interventions. Continued attention to cultural and migration influences are important areas for cancer screening intervention development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosario Costas-Muñiz
- Immigrant Health and Cancer Disparities Service, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 485 Lexington Avenue, 2nd Floor, New York, NY, 10017, USA.
- Department of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Lina Jandorf
- Department of Oncological Services, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1425 Madison Ave, Suite 3-70, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Errol Philip
- Notre Dame Laboratory for Psycho-Oncology Research, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA
| | - Noah Cohen
- Department of Oncological Services, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1425 Madison Ave, Suite 3-70, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Cristina Villagra
- Department of Oncological Services, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1425 Madison Ave, Suite 3-70, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Pathu Sriphanlop
- Department of Oncological Services, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1425 Madison Ave, Suite 3-70, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Elizabeth Schofield
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 641 Lexington Avenue, 7th Floor, New York, NY, 10022, USA
| | - Katherine DuHamel
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 641 Lexington Avenue, 7th Floor, New York, NY, 10022, USA
- Department of Oncological Services, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1425 Madison Ave, Suite 3-70, New York, NY, 10029, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hillyer GC, Schmitt KM, Freedberg DE, Kramer RA, Su Y, Rosenberg RM, Neugut AI. Fecal-based colorectal cancer screening among the uninsured in northern Manhattan. Am J Prev Med 2014; 47:182-7. [PMID: 24951037 PMCID: PMC4127996 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2014] [Revised: 03/13/2014] [Accepted: 03/24/2014] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening reduces CRC mortality; however, for many reasons, uninsured individuals are less likely to utilize CRC screening tests. PURPOSE To compare CRC screening behaviors and outcomes with guaiac fecal occult blood testing (gFOBT) from 1998 to 2006 and fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) from 2006 to 2010 in a community-based program serving uninsured patients in northern Manhattan. METHODS In 2013, we conducted a retrospective record review of individuals aged ≥50 years who received fecal-based CRC screening at the Northern Manhattan Cancer Screening Partnership between 1998 and 2010. Included were those with household income ≤250% of the federal poverty level, no medical insurance coverage, and who were not up to date with CRC screening. We assessed screening positivity rate, positive predictive value, differences in the use of diagnostic colonoscopy, colonoscopic findings, and adenoma detection rates for gFOBT versus FIT. RESULTS In total, 7,710 patients completed CRC screenings (4,951 gFOBT and 2,759 FIT). The majority were female, Hispanic, foreign born, and young at age of first screening. Compared to gFOBT, FIT detected twice as many positive tests (3.2% vs 1.5%, p≤0.001) and had a higher adenoma detection rate (18.2 vs 11.8, p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS The improved positivity and adenoma detection rates with greater number of screening tests over time favor the use of FIT over gFOBT for colorectal screening among uninsured populations in northern Manhattan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace Clarke Hillyer
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public HealthColumbia University, New York.
| | | | | | - Rachel A Kramer
- New York State Department of Health, Division of Chronic Disease Prevention, Albany, New York
| | - Yin Su
- New York State Department of Health, Division of Chronic Disease Prevention, Albany, New York
| | | | - Alfred I Neugut
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public HealthColumbia University, New York; Division of Hematology and Oncology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Morabia A, Costanza MC. Culture(s). Prev Med 2012; 55:351-2. [PMID: 23122058 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|