1
|
Isonne C, Marzuillo C, Villari P, Baccolini V. The role of vaccine literacy and health literacy in the health prevention decision-making process. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2024; 20:2321675. [PMID: 38445564 PMCID: PMC10953609 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2321675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2024] [Accepted: 02/17/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Isonne
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Carolina Marzuillo
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Villari
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Valentina Baccolini
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Davies MP, Vulkan D, Gabe R, Duffy SW, Field JK. Impact of single round of low dose CT lung cancer screening on cause of mortality in different socio-economic groups: a post-hoc analysis of long-term follow-up of the UKLS trial. THE LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH. EUROPE 2024; 42:100936. [PMID: 38813535 PMCID: PMC11134881 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.100936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2024] [Revised: 05/02/2024] [Accepted: 05/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024]
Abstract
Background Lower socioeconomic status, as measured by the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD), is associated with higher rates of smoking-related disease mortality, and with poor uptake of cancer screening. Here we explore whether socioeconomic status impacts the effectiveness of a single round of low-dose-CT screening, or impacts other causes of death, in the UKLS LDCT screening trial. Methods IMD quintiles were defined according to UK-wide data, with the deprived group defined as the lower two quintiles (Q1-2) and the less deprived as Q3-5. Follow-up data was obtained for lung cancer diagnosis (median follow-up 9.1 years) and cause of death (median follow-up 9.9 years). Outcomes were compared based on IMD group and trial arm (CT or control). Findings More deprived quintiles were less likely to respond to the questionnaire, but this population was more likely to be selected for screening by the LLP risk model. Lower IMD quintiles benefitted from low-dose-CT screening in terms of lung cancer survival (HR 1.89, 95% CI 1.16-3.08) to the same extent as upper quintiles (HR 1.87, 95% CI 1.07-3.26). However, there was a bigger impact on deaths due to COPD and emphysema in more deprived quintiles. Interpretation Whilst LDCT screening benefit for lung cancer was similar, significant impact on the rates of death from other smoking-related diseases, notably COPD and emphysema, was seen primarily in lower socioeconomic groups. Future research is required to confirm how lung cancer screening benefits other disease outcomes. Funding NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme; NIHR Policy Research programme; Roy Castle Lung Cancer Foundation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael P.A. Davies
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine Institute of Systems, Molecular & Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Daniel Vulkan
- Centre for Evaluation and Methods, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Rhian Gabe
- Centre for Evaluation and Methods, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Stephen W. Duffy
- Centre for Cancer Screening, Prevention and Early Diagnosis, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - John K. Field
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine Institute of Systems, Molecular & Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Goh PH, Loh HY, Chung KR, Ramadas A. Body (dis)satisfaction and health screening behaviors: A systematic review of observational studies. J Health Psychol 2024; 29:137-155. [PMID: 37493189 PMCID: PMC10799541 DOI: 10.1177/13591053231189413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Engagement in health-promoting behaviors has been argued to be dependent on psychological factors in addition to simply having knowledge or access to resources. We systematically reviewed the evidence for the association between body (dis)satisfaction and health screening behaviors using six electronic databases and supplementary manual searches in the current study. To be included in the review, studies had to be empirical, in any language, and examined the potential link between body (dis)satisfaction and health screening. Findings from the final 16 quantitative and 12 qualitative studies generally suggest that people who were more satisfied or less dissatisfied with their bodies were more likely to engage in health screening. This review also highlighted key gaps in the literature such as the limited studies that included men as participants and the lack of examination of the underlying mechanisms and contingencies of the relationship between body (dis)satisfaction and health screening behaviors.
Collapse
|
4
|
Mulcahy Symmons S, Leavy P, Heavey L, Mason Mohan C, Drury A, De Brún A. How is equity captured for colorectal, breast and cervical cancer incidence and screening in the Republic of Ireland: A review. Prev Med Rep 2023; 36:102405. [PMID: 37753379 PMCID: PMC10518567 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2023] [Revised: 09/06/2023] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Organised screening reduces the incidence and late-stage diagnosis of cancer. However, participation in screening is not consistent across populations. Variations can be measured using demographic factors on place of residence, race/ethnicity, occupation, gender/sex, religion, education, socio-economic position (SEP), and social capital (PROGRESS-Plus stratifiers). The Republic of Ireland has screening programmes for colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer but assessment of screening participation and cancer incidence is inconsistent. The review aimed to evaluate the use of stratifiers in breast, cervical and colorectal cancer incidence and screening literature, and assess variations in incidence and screening participation across subgroups in Ireland. Methods PubMed was searched systematically and grey literature was identified via Google, Google Scholar, Lenus (Irish Health Research repository), and The Irish Longitudinal Study of Aging (TILDA) in June 2022. Studies were included if they captured stratifiers alongside incidence or screening participation data of the three cancers. Results Thirty-six studies and reports were included. Place of residence, SEP, sex, and age were most frequently captured. Incidence and screening participation varied by age, place of residence, SEP, and sex. Discussion PROGRESS-Plus is a useful equity lens to review health literature. Cancer incidence and screening participation studies lacked a comprehensive equity lens resulting in difficulties in identifying inequities and non-attenders. Place of residence, SEP and ethnicity should be prioritised in monitoring inequities. Integrating unique health identifiers should improve monitoring and enable evidence-based population-specific interventions to promote screening. Collaboration with community organisations would support engagement with vulnerable populations when data is limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Mulcahy Symmons
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Ireland
- UCD Centre for Interdisciplinary Research, Education, and Innovation in Health Systems (UCD IRIS), School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Ireland
| | - Paul Leavy
- Centre for Health Policy and Management, School of Medicine, Trinty College Dublin, Ireland
| | - Laura Heavey
- Department of Public Health Medicine, National Screening Service, King’s Inn House, 200 Parnell Street, Dublin 1, Ireland
| | - Caroline Mason Mohan
- Department of Public Health Medicine, National Screening Service, King’s Inn House, 200 Parnell Street, Dublin 1, Ireland
| | - Amanda Drury
- School of Nursing, Psychotherapy and Community Health, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin 9, Ireland
| | - Aoife De Brún
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Ireland
- UCD Centre for Interdisciplinary Research, Education, and Innovation in Health Systems (UCD IRIS), School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yoon S, Goh H, Phang JK, Kwan YH, Low LL. Socioeconomic and behavioral determinants of non-compliance with physician referrals following community screening for diabetes, hypertension and hyperlipidemia: a mixed-methods study. Sci Rep 2023; 13:20554. [PMID: 37996479 PMCID: PMC10667337 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-47168-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Early detection of undiagnosed diabetes, hypertension or hyperlipidemia through screening could reduce healthcare costs resulting from disease complications. To date, despite ample research on the factors linked to the uptake of community health screening programs, little attention has been directed at delayed or incomplete follow-up after positive outcomes are identified in community screening tests. This study aimed to investigate the socioeconomic and behavioral factors that influence non-compliance with recommendations for primary care physician referrals, following community-based screening for diabetes, hypertension and hyperlipidemia. A parallel mixed-methods study was conducted. For quantitative data, we performed multivariable analysis on community-based chronic disease screening data. The qualitative component involved semi-structured interviews with individuals with both non-compliance and compliance with referral recommendations. Thematic data analysis was undertaken using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). The quantitative analysis showed that older age (OR = 0.92, 95%CI [0.89-0.96]), non-Chinese ethnicity (OR = 0.24; 95% CI [0.08-0.44]) and residing in 5-room public/ private housing (OR = 0.40; 95% CI [0.14-0.74]) were associated with lower odds of non-compliance with referral recommendations. Thematic analysis identified multiple behavioral-level determinants acting as enablers or barriers within 7 TDF domains: awareness of health risks after receiving screening results, self-management orientation and behavioral control, fear of formal diagnosis and concerns about healthcare cost, optimistic belief driven by the lack of symptoms, interpersonal relationship and social obligations, aversion to medication, communication at the result collection and sense of uncertainty regarding self-scheduling of appointment. Findings provide valuable implications for the development of interventions aimed at improving adherence to referral recommendation. Future endeavors should include culturally sensitive outreach, evidence-based information dissemination, family-centered education, positive public health messaging, brief counseling during result collection and an opt-out appointment system to enhance follow-up care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sungwon Yoon
- Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
- Centre for Population Health Research and Implementation (CPHRI), Singapore Health Services, Singapore, Singapore.
| | - Hendra Goh
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jie Kie Phang
- Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
- Centre for Population Health Research and Implementation (CPHRI), Singapore Health Services, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yu Heng Kwan
- Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
- Centre for Population Health Research and Implementation (CPHRI), Singapore Health Services, Singapore, Singapore
- SingHealth Internal Medicine Residency Programme, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Lian Leng Low
- Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
- Centre for Population Health Research and Implementation (CPHRI), Singapore Health Services, Singapore, Singapore
- Population Health and Integrated Care Office (PHICO), Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Family Medicine and Continuing Care, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
- Post-Acute and Continuing Care, Outram Community Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
- SingHealth Duke-NUS Family Medicine Academic Clinical Program, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jansen L, Schwettmann L, Behr C, Eberle A, Holleczek B, Justenhoven C, Kajüter H, Manz K, Peters F, Pritzkuleit R, Schmidt-Pokrzywniak A, Sirri E, Tetzlaff F, Voigtländer S, Arndt V. Trends in cancer incidence by socioeconomic deprivation in Germany in 2007 to 2018: An ecological registry-based study. Int J Cancer 2023; 153:1784-1796. [PMID: 37539757 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34662] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Revised: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/05/2023]
Abstract
Age-standardized cancer incidence has decreased over the last years for many cancer sites in developed countries. Whether these trends led to narrowing or widening socioeconomic inequalities in cancer incidence is unknown. Using cancer registry data covering 48 million inhabitants in Germany, the ecological association between age-standardized total and site specific (colorectal, lung, prostate and breast) cancer incidence in 2007 to 2018 and a deprivation index on district level (aggregated to quintiles) was investigated. Incidence in the most and least deprived districts were compared using Poisson models. Average annual percentage changes (AAPCs) and differences in AAPCs between deprivation quintiles were assessed using Joinpoint regression analyses. Age-standardized incidence decreased strongly between 2007 and 2018 for total cancer and all cancer sites (except female lung cancer), irrespective of the level of deprivation. However, differences in the magnitude of trends across deprivation quintiles resulted in increasing inequalities over time for total cancer, colorectal and lung cancer. For total cancer, the incidence rate ratio between the most and least deprived quintile increased from 1.07 (95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.12) to 1.23 (1.12-1.32) in men and from 1.07 (1.01-1.13) to 1.20 (1.14-1.26) in women. Largest inequalities were observed for lung cancer with 82% (men) and 88% (women) higher incidence in the most vs the least deprived regions in 2018. The observed increase in inequalities in cancer incidence is in alignment with trends in inequalities in risk factor prevalence and partly utilization of screening. Intervention programs targeted at socioeconomically deprived and urban regions are highly needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lina Jansen
- Epidemiological Cancer Registry Baden-Württemberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lars Schwettmann
- Division for Health Economics, Department of Health Services Research, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Christian Behr
- Cancer Registry Rheinland-Palatinate gGmbH, Mainz, Germany
| | - Andrea Eberle
- Bremen Cancer Registry, Leibniz-Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology: BIPS, Bremen, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Kirsi Manz
- Cancer Registry Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, Institute for Community Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | | | - Ron Pritzkuleit
- Institute for Cancer Epidemiology, University Lübeck, Cancer Registry Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | | | - Eunice Sirri
- Epidemiological Cancer Registry Lower Saxony, Registerstelle, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Fabian Tetzlaff
- Division of Social Determinants of Health, Robert Koch-Institute, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sven Voigtländer
- Bavarian Cancer Registry, Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority, Nürnberg, Germany
| | - Volker Arndt
- Epidemiological Cancer Registry Baden-Württemberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Silva GAE, Damacena GN, Ribeiro CM, Alcantara LLDM, de Souza PRB, Szwarcwald CL. Papanicolaou test in Brazil: analysis of the National Health Survey of 2013 and 2019. Rev Saude Publica 2023; 57:55. [PMID: 37878841 PMCID: PMC10519687 DOI: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2023057004798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 10/27/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare the coverage of cervical cancer screening in Brazil in 2013 and 2019, investigating the factors associated with having the test performed and the reasons given for not doing it. Additionally, a comparison is made concerning the time taken to receive the test result in SUS (Sistema Único de Saúde) and in the private health services. METHODS Using data from the National Health Survey (Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde - PNS), prevalence rates and corresponding confidence intervals were calculated to determine the frequency of recent cervical cancer screenings among women aged between 25 and 64 years old in Brazil, for both 2013 and 2019. Poisson regression models were employed to compare the prevalence of the outcome according to sociodemographic characteristics. The reasons for not having the test and the time between performing and receiving the result were also analyzed. RESULTS The findings revealed an increase in the coverage of preventive cervical cancer exams in Brazil from 78.7% in 2013 to 81.3% in 2019. Additionally, there was a decline in the proportion of women who had never undergone the exam, from 9.7% to 6.1%. Prevalence of test uptake was higher among white women, those with higher levels of education and income, and those residing in the South and Southeast regions of the country. The most commonly cited reasons for not taking the test were the impression it was unnecessary (45% in both 2013 and 2019) and never having been asked to undergo the test (20.6% in 2013 and 14.8% in 2019). CONCLUSIONS Despite the high coverage of screening achieved in the country, there is great inequality in access to the test, and a non-negligible number of women are at greater risk of dying from a preventable disease. Efforts must be made to structure an organized screening program that identifies and captures the most vulnerable women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gulnar Azevedo e Silva
- Universidade do Estado do Rio de JaneiroInstituto de Medicina Social Hesio CordeiroRio de JaneiroRJBrazilUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de Medicina Social Hesio Cordeiro. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | - Giseli Nogueira Damacena
- Fundação Oswaldo CruzInstituto de Comunicação e Informação Científica e Tecnológica em SaúdeRio de JaneiroRJBrazil Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Comunicação e Informação Científica e Tecnológica em Saúde. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | - Caroline Madalena Ribeiro
- Ministério da SaúdeProgramas de RastreamentoRio de JaneiroRJBrazilMinistério da Saúde. Programas de Rastreamento. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | - Luciana Leite de Mattos Alcantara
- Universidade Federal do Rio de JaneiroPrograma de Engenharia BiomédicaRio de JaneiroRJBrazil Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Programa de Engenharia Biomédica. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | - Paulo Roberto Borges de Souza
- Fundação Oswaldo CruzInstituto de Comunicação e Informação Científica e Tecnológica em SaúdeRio de JaneiroRJBrazil Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Comunicação e Informação Científica e Tecnológica em Saúde. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | - Célia Landmann Szwarcwald
- Fundação Oswaldo CruzInstituto de Comunicação e Informação Científica e Tecnológica em SaúdeRio de JaneiroRJBrazil Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Comunicação e Informação Científica e Tecnológica em Saúde. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bhattacharyya O, Relation T, Fisher JL, Li Y, Oppong BA. County characteristics associated with refusing breast cancer surgery: Evidence from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program. Surgery 2023; 174:457-463. [PMID: 37296055 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.04.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2023] [Revised: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 04/27/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Individuals' communities impact cancer disparities and are intimately related to social determinants of health. Studies show that personal factors affect treatment refusals for a potentially curable cancer, but few studies have investigated whether community-based characteristics affect the receipt of surgery. METHODS We used Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Program registries from 2010 to 2015 to examine differences in rates of surgery refusal among non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, and Hispanic women diagnosed with nonmetastatic breast cancer. The community factor measures were based on county-level factors. Sociodemographic and community differences were analyzed using Pearson's χ2 tests and analysis of variance. Multivariate logistic regression of predictors of surgery refusal and the Cox proportional hazard model of disease-specific mortality were performed. RESULTS Surgery refusers among non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic all races lived in counties with lower rates of educational attainment, median family and household income, and higher rates of poverty, unemployment, foreign-born, language isolation, urban population, and women more than 40 years old having mammography in last 2 years. Multivariate analysis shows surgery refusal rates increased in counties having a high percentage of urban population and declined in counties with an increased percentage of less than high school level education, unemployment, and median household income. Breast cancer-specific mortality increased significantly with surgery refusal. CONCLUSION Residence in counties with the lowest socioeconomic status and disproportionately populated by racial and ethnic minorities is associated with surgery refusal. Given the high mortality associated with refusing surgery, culturally sensitive education on the benefits of care may be appropriate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oindrila Bhattacharyya
- James Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; The William Tierney Center for Health Services Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Theresa Relation
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; MetroHealth Systems Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
| | - James L Fisher
- James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Yaming Li
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Bridget A Oppong
- James Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rollet Q, Exarchakou A, Launoy G, Merville O, Rubio FJ, Belot A. Functional forms of socio-territorial inequities in breast cancer screening - A French cross-sectional study using hierarchical generalised additive models. Prev Med 2023; 173:107587. [PMID: 37355102 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Revised: 06/15/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 06/26/2023]
Abstract
To reduce the breast cancer burden, the French National Organised Breast Cancer Screening Programme (FNOBCSP) was implemented in 2004. The recommended participation rate has never been achieved and socio-territorial inequities in participation have been reported on several occasions. We investigated the functional forms and consistency of the relationships between neighbourhood deprivation, travel time to the nearest accredited radiology centre and screening uptake. We used two-level hierarchical generalised additive models in 8 types of territories classified by socio-demographic and economic factors. The first level was 368,201 women aged 50-72 invited to the 2013-2014 screening campaign in metropolitan France. They were nested in 41 départements, the level of organisation of the FNOBCSP. The effect of travel time showed two main patterns: it was either linear (with participation decreasing as travel time increased) or participation first increased with increasing travel time to a peak around 5-15 min and decreased afterward. In nearly all types and départements, the probability of participation decreased linearly with increasing deprivation. Territorial inequities in participation were more context-dependent and complex than social inequities. Inequities in participation represent a loss of opportunity for individuals who already have the worst cancer outcomes. Evidence-based public health policies are needed to increase the effectiveness and equity of breast cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Quentin Rollet
- Inequalities in Cancer Outcomes Network (ICON), Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK; U1086 "ANTICIPE" INSERM, University of Caen Normandie, Centre François Baclesse, 3, Avenue du Général Harris, Caen 14000, France.
| | - Aimilia Exarchakou
- Inequalities in Cancer Outcomes Network (ICON), Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK
| | - Guy Launoy
- U1086 "ANTICIPE" INSERM, University of Caen Normandie, Centre François Baclesse, 3, Avenue du Général Harris, Caen 14000, France
| | - Ophélie Merville
- U1086 "ANTICIPE" INSERM, University of Caen Normandie, Centre François Baclesse, 3, Avenue du Général Harris, Caen 14000, France
| | - Francisco J Rubio
- Department of Statistical Science, University College London, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Aurélien Belot
- Inequalities in Cancer Outcomes Network (ICON), Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Dasgupta P, Cameron JK, Goodwin B, Cramb SM, Mengersen K, Aitken JF, Baade PD. Geographical and spatial variations in bowel cancer screening participation, Australia, 2015-2020. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0288992. [PMID: 37471422 PMCID: PMC10358922 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288992] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Accepted: 07/09/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Participation in bowel cancer screening programs remains poor in many countries. Knowledge of geographical variation in participation rates may help design targeted interventions to improve uptake. This study describes small-area and broad geographical patterns in bowel screening participation in Australia between 2015-2020. METHODS Publicly available population-level participation data for Australia's National Bowel Cancer Screening Program (NBCSP) were modelled using generalized linear models to quantify screening patterns by remoteness and area-level disadvantage. Bayesian spatial models were used to obtain smoothed estimates of participation across 2,247 small areas during 2019-2020 compared to the national average, and during 2015-2016 and 2017-2018 for comparison. Spatial heterogeneity was assessed using the maximized excess events test. RESULTS Overall, screening participation rates was around 44% over the three time-periods. Participation was consistently lower in remote or disadvantaged areas, although heterogeneity was evident within these broad categories. There was strong evidence of spatial differences in participation over all three periods, with little change in patterns between time periods. If the spatial variation was reduced (so low participation areas were increased to the 80th centile), an extra 250,000 screens (4% of total) would have been conducted during 2019-2020. CONCLUSIONS Despite having a well-structured evidence-based government funded national bowel cancer screening program, the substantial spatial variation in participation rates highlights the importance of accounting for the unique characteristics of specific geographical regions and their inhabitants. Identifying the reasons for geographical disparities could inform interventions to achieve more equitable access and a higher overall bowel screening uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paramita Dasgupta
- Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Jessica K. Cameron
- Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- School of Mathematical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Belinda Goodwin
- Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Centre for Heath Research, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, Queensland, Australia
| | - Susanna M. Cramb
- Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation & Centre for Healthcare Transformation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Centre for Data Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Kerrie Mengersen
- Centre for Data Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Joanne F. Aitken
- Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Peter D. Baade
- Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Centre for Data Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Southport, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Cook CE, Bailliard A, Bent JA, Bialosky JE, Carlino E, Colloca L, Esteves JE, Newell D, Palese A, Reed WR, Vilardaga JP, Rossettini G. An international consensus definition for contextual factors: findings from a nominal group technique. Front Psychol 2023; 14:1178560. [PMID: 37465492 PMCID: PMC10351924 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1178560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 07/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective Emerging literature suggests contextual factors are important components of therapeutic encounters and may substantially influence clinical outcomes of a treatment intervention. At present, a single consensus definition of contextual factors, which is universal across all health-related conditions is lacking. The objective of this study was to create a consensus definition of contextual factors to better refine this concept for clinicians and researchers. Design The study used a multi-stage virtual Nominal Group Technique (vNGT) to create and rank contextual factor definitions. Nominal group techniques are a form of consensus-based research, and are beneficial for identifying problems, exploring solutions and establishing priorities. Setting International. Main outcome measures The initial stages of the vNGT resulted in the creation of 14 independent contextual factor definitions. After a prolonged discussion period, the initial definitions were heavily modified, and 12 final definitions were rank ordered by the vNGT participants from first to last. Participants The 10 international vNGT participants had a variety of clinical backgrounds and research specializations and were all specialists in contextual factors research. Results A sixth round was used to identify a final consensus, which reflected the complexity of contextual factors and included three primary domains: (1) an overall definition; (2) qualifiers that serve as examples of the key areas of the definition; and (3) how contextual factors may influence clinical outcomes. Conclusion Our consensus definition of contextual factors seeks to improve the understanding and communication between clinicians and researchers. These are especially important in recognizing their potential role in moderating and/or mediating clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chad E. Cook
- Department of Orthopaedics, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Antoine Bailliard
- Department of Orthopaedics, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
- Occupational Therapy Doctorate Division, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Jennifer A. Bent
- Department of Rehabilitation, Duke University Hospital System, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Joel E. Bialosky
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
- Brooks-PHHP Research Collaboration, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Elisa Carlino
- Department of Neuroscience Rita Levi Montalcini, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Luana Colloca
- Departement of Pain and Translational Symptom Science and the Placebo Beyond Opinions Center, University of Maryland School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Jorge E. Esteves
- Clinical-Based Human Research Department, Foundation COME Collaboration, Pescara, Italy
- Malta ICOM Educational, Gżira, Malta
| | - Dave Newell
- Anglo-European College of Chiropractic University College, Bournemouth, United Kingdom
| | - Alvisa Palese
- Department of Medical Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - William R. Reed
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Richardson-Parry A, Baas C, Donde S, Ferraiolo B, Karmo M, Maravic Z, Münter L, Ricci-Cabello I, Silva M, Tinianov S, Valderas JM, Woodruff S, van Vugt J. Interventions to reduce cancer screening inequities: the perspective and role of patients, advocacy groups, and empowerment organizations. Int J Equity Health 2023; 22:19. [PMID: 36707816 PMCID: PMC9880917 DOI: 10.1186/s12939-023-01841-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2022] [Accepted: 01/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health inequities lead to low rates of cancer screening in certain populations, such as low-income and ethnic minority groups. Different interventions to address this have been developed with mixed results. However, interventions are not always developed in collaboration with the people they target. The aim of our article is to present the viewpoint of patients, survivors, advocates, and lay persons on interventions to increase cancer screening from a health inequity perspective. METHODS We prepared talking points to guide discussions between coauthors, who included representatives from nine patient and survivor advocacy groups, organizations working for citizen/patient empowerment, and health equity experts. Perspectives and opinions were first collected through video conferencing meetings and a first draft of the paper was prepared. All authors, read through, revised, and discussed the contents to reach an agreement on the final perspectives to be presented. RESULTS Several themes were identified: it is important to not view screening as a discrete event; barriers underlying an individual's access and willingness to undergo screening span across a continuum; individually tailored interventions are likely to be more effective than a one-size fits-all approach because they may better accommodate the person's personal beliefs, knowledge, behaviors, and preferences; targeting people who are unknown to medical services and largely unreachable is a major challenge; including professional patient advocacy groups and relevant lay persons in the cocreation of interventions at all stages of design, implementation, and evaluation is essential along with relevant stakeholders (healthcare professionals, researchers, local government and community organizations etc). CONCLUSIONS Interventions to address cancer screening inequity currently do not adequately solve the issue, especially from the viewpoint of patients, survivors, and lay persons. Several core pathways should be focused on when designing and implementing interventions: advancing individually tailored interventions; digital tools and social media; peer-based approaches; empowerment; addressing policy and system barriers; better design of interventions; and collaboration, including the involvement of patients and patient advocacy organizations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Afua Richardson-Parry
- Viatris Global Healthcare UK, Building 4, Trident Place, Mosquito Way, Hatfield, London, AL10 9UL UK
| | - Carole Baas
- grid.470316.7Alamo Breast Cancer Foundation, 909 Midland Creek Drive, Southlake, TX 76092 USA
| | - Shaantanu Donde
- Viatris Global Healthcare, Building 4, Trident Place, Mosquito Way, Hatfield, London, AL10 9UL UK
| | - Bianca Ferraiolo
- Cittadinanzattiva - Active Citizenship Network, Rue Philippe Le Bon 46, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Maimah Karmo
- grid.430731.2Tigerlily Foundation, 42020 Village Center Plaza, #120-156, Stone Ridge, 20105 USA
| | - Zorana Maravic
- Digestive Cancers Europe, Rue de la Loi 235/27, 1040 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Lars Münter
- Danish Committee for Health Education, Classensgade 71, 5, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ignacio Ricci-Cabello
- grid.507085.fBalearic Islands Health Research Institute (IdISBa) and CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), C/ Escola Graduada 3, 07002 Palma, Balearic Islands Spain
| | - Mitchell Silva
- Esperity, Clos Chapelle-aux-Champs 30, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Stacey Tinianov
- Advocates for Collaborative Education, 824 Windsor Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95062 USA
| | - Jose M. Valderas
- grid.4280.e0000 0001 2180 6431National University of Singapore, 1E Kent Ridge Road, NUHS Tower Block, Singapore, 119228 Singapore
| | | | - Joris van Vugt
- Viatris, Aalsterweg 172, 5644 RH Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Barriers to Breast Cancer-Screening Adherence in Vulnerable Populations. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15030604. [PMID: 36765561 PMCID: PMC9913751 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15030604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2022] [Revised: 12/19/2022] [Accepted: 01/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer screening through periodic mammography has been effective in decreasing mortality and reducing the impact of this disease. However, adherence to screening does not meet the desired expectations from all populations. The main objective of this review is to explore the barriers that affect adherence to breast cancer-screening programs in vulnerable populations according to race and/or ethnicity in order to propose measures to reduce the lack of adherence. We conducted a search of publications in the PubMed Central and Scopus databases. The eligible criteria for the articles were as follows: original quantitative studies appearing in SJR- and/or JCR-indexed journals from 2016 to 2021 in English or Spanish. Most of them present common barriers, such as race/ethnicity (47%), low socioeconomic (35.3%) and educational levels (29.4%), no family history of cancer and being single (29.4%), medical mistrust and a health information gap (23.5%), lack of private health insurance (17.6%) and not having annual health checks (17.6%). The target populations with the lowest adherence were Black, Asian, Hispanic and foreign women. Implementing awareness campaigns focused on these populations should be promoted, as well as working on diversity, cultural acceptance and respect with healthcare workers, in order to improve breast cancer-screening adherence worldwide.
Collapse
|
14
|
Davis KV, Hallman MH, DiCarlo M, Wambua SM, Jaffe RL, Welsh AW, Kerber C, Yang H, Chambers CV, Myers RE. Factors Likely to Affect the Uptake of Genomic Approaches to Cancer Screening in Primary Care: A Scoping Review. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12122044. [PMID: 36556264 PMCID: PMC9785136 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12122044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2022] [Revised: 12/02/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Genomic tests are being developed for use in cancer screening. As most screening is offered in primary care settings, primary care provider and patient perceptions of such tests are likely to affect uptake. We conducted a scoping review to synthesize information on factors likely to affect patient and provider use of biospecimen collection and analysis for cancer screening, methods referred to as liquid biopsy or multi-cancer early detection (MCED) testing when used to detect multiple cancers. We ultimately identified 7 articles for review and analyzed them for major themes. None reported on primary care provider perspectives. Six articles focused on patient perceptions about testing for a single cancer (colorectal), and 1 reported on patient views related to testing for multiple cancers. Factors favoring this type of testing included its non-invasiveness, and the perceived safety, convenience, and effectiveness of testing. There is a dearth of information in the literature on primary care provider perceptions about liquid biopsy and MCED testing. The limited information on patient perceptions suggests that they are receptive to such tests. Research on primary care provider and patient test-related knowledge, attitudes, and behavior is needed to guide future implementation in primary care settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaitlyn V. Davis
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, 1015 Walnut St., Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Mie H. Hallman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, 834 Chestnut St., The Franklin Building, Suite 314, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Melissa DiCarlo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, 834 Chestnut St., The Franklin Building, Suite 314, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Sophie M. Wambua
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, 1015 Walnut St., Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Rachel L. Jaffe
- Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, 834 Chestnut St., The Franklin Building, Suite 314, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Allison W. Welsh
- Exact Sciences Corporation, 5505 Endeavor Lane, Madison, WI 53719, USA
| | - Cameron Kerber
- Exact Sciences Corporation, 5505 Endeavor Lane, Madison, WI 53719, USA
| | - Hushan Yang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, 834 Chestnut St., The Franklin Building, Suite 314, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Christopher V. Chambers
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, 1015 Walnut St., Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Ronald E. Myers
- Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, 834 Chestnut St., The Franklin Building, Suite 314, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-215-503-4085
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Prognostic factors and outcomes in women with breast cancer in Slovenia in relation to step-wise implementation of organized screening. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0278384. [PMID: 36449489 PMCID: PMC9710755 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim of organized breast cancer screening is early detection and reduction in mortality. Organized screening should promote equal access and reduce socio-economic inequalities. In Slovenia, organized breast cancer screening achieved complete coverage in 11-years' time. We explored whether step-wise implementation reflects in prognostic factors (earlier diagnosis and treatment) and survival of breast cancer patients in our population. METHODS Using population-based cancer registry and screening registry data on breast cancer cases from 2008-2018, we compared stage distribution and mean time to surgical treatment in (A) women who underwent at least one mammography in the organized screening programme, women who received at least one invitation but did not undergo mammography and women who did not receive any screening invitation, and in (B) women who were invited to organized screening and those who were not. We also compared net survival by stage in different groups of women according to their screening programme status. RESULTS Women who underwent at least one mammography in organized screening had lower disease stage at diagnosis. Time-to-treatment analysis showed mean time to surgery was shortest in women not included in organized screening (all stages = 36.0 days vs. 40.3 days in women included in organized screening). This could be due to quality assurance protocols with an obligatory multidisciplinary approach within the organized screening vs. standard treatment pathways which can vary in different (smaller) hospitals. Higher standard of care in screening is reflected in better survival in women included in organized screening (5-years net survival for regional stage: at least one mammography in the screening programme- 96%; invitation, but no mammography- 87.4%; no invitation or mammography in the screening programme- 82.6%). CONCLUSION Our study, which is one of the first in central European countries, shows that introduction of organized screening has temporary effects on population cancer burden indicators already during roll-out period, which should therefore be as short as possible.
Collapse
|
16
|
Khumalo PG, Carey M, Mackenzie L, Sanson-Fisher R. Cervical cancer screening-related knowledge among community health workers in Eswatini: a cross-sectional survey. Health Promot Int 2022; 37:6671812. [PMID: 35984338 DOI: 10.1093/heapro/daac103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Eswatini has the highest age-standardized incidence and second highest mortality rate related to cervical cancer globally. In Eswatini, community health workers educate communities about cervical cancer screening. They need to have accurate knowledge about cervical cancer and screening to do this effectively. Therefore, the current study aimed to assess knowledge regarding cervical cancer screening among community health workers in Eswatini. A telephone survey of 172 community health workers from eight selected constituencies was conducted. Descriptive analyses were performed to assess participants' socio-demographic and service-related characteristics. Linear regression was applied to investigate factors associated with cervical cancer screening-related knowledge. One hundred and seven (62%) participants answered at least 80% of the questions correctly. However, knowledge regarding cervical cancer risk factors, the meaning of screening results and Eswatini cervical cancer screening guidelines was suboptimal. Community health workers aged 46-55 were more likely (β = 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.39-2.15, p < 0.01) to have a higher cervical cancer screening knowledge score than those aged 30-45 years. Community health workers from Lubombo were marginally less likely (β = -0.83, 95% CI: -1.80 to -0.04, p = 0.05) to have a higher knowledge score than those from Hhohho. This study suggests knowledge deficits amongst community health workers in Eswatini. Knowledge deficits may result in inaccurate information being communicated to clients. While increasing knowledge of these vital health workers may not be sufficient to increase cervical cancer screening rates in Eswatini, it is an essential first step that should be the focus of future educational efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phinda G Khumalo
- Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine, and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales 2308, Australia.,Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales 2308, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton, New South Wales 2305, Australia
| | - Mariko Carey
- School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine, and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales 2308, Australia.,Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales 2308, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton, New South Wales 2305, Australia
| | - Lisa Mackenzie
- Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine, and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales 2308, Australia.,Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales 2308, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton, New South Wales 2305, Australia
| | - Rob Sanson-Fisher
- Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine, and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales 2308, Australia.,Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales 2308, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton, New South Wales 2305, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Shih YCT, Sabik LM, Stout NK, Halpern MT, Lipscomb J, Ramsey S, Ritzwoller DP. Health Economics Research in Cancer Screening: Research Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2022; 2022:42-50. [PMID: 35788368 PMCID: PMC9255920 DOI: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgac008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Accepted: 03/03/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Cancer screening has long been considered a worthy public health investment. Health economics offers the theoretical foundation and research methodology to understand the demand- and supply-side factors associated with screening and evaluate screening-related policies and interventions. This article provides an overview of health economic theories and methods related to cancer screening and discusses opportunities for future research. We review 2 academic disciplines most relevant to health economics research in cancer screening: applied microeconomics and decision science. We consider 3 emerging topics: cancer screening policies in national as well as local contexts, "choosing wisely" screening practices, and targeted screening efforts for vulnerable subpopulations. We also discuss the strengths and weaknesses of available data sources and opportunities for methodological research and training. Recommendations to strengthen research infrastructure include developing novel data linkage strategies, increasing access to electronic health records, establishing curriculum and training programs, promoting multidisciplinary collaborations, and enhancing research funding opportunities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ya-Chen Tina Shih
- Correspondence to: Ya-Chen Tina Shih, PhD, Department of Health Services Research, Unit 1444, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030-4009, USA.
| | - Lindsay M Sabik
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Natasha K Stout
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michael T Halpern
- Healthcare Delivery Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Joseph Lipscomb
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health, and the Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Scott Ramsey
- Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Debra P Ritzwoller
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Rollet Q, Guillaume É, Launay L, Launoy G. Socio-Territorial Inequities in the French National Breast Cancer Screening Programme-A Cross-Sectional Multilevel Study. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13174374. [PMID: 34503184 PMCID: PMC8430540 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13174374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2021] [Revised: 08/24/2021] [Accepted: 08/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary France implemented a national breast cancer screening programme in 2004, which, despite recommendations, still coexists with opportunistic screening practices. We aimed to study socio-territorial inequities in participation in the 2013–2014 screening campaign, using multilevel models. With a representative sample of 42% of the estimated eligible population, we found that the organized programme does not erase social or territorial inequities in participation. Social inequities, at multiple levels, were found in nearly all départements, whereas territorial inequities seemed more context dependent. The impact of the coexistence with opportunistic screening, beyond any control and evaluation, is adding more risks (over-diagnosis, over-treatment) and leads to underestimating the true coverage of the population, mainly in the wealthiest, therefore leading to an underestimation of the true social gradient in participation. The French breast cancer screening programme needs to evolve to be more efficient in coverage, notably through the reduction of the unfair inequities in participation. Abstract Background. France implemented in 2004 the French National Breast Cancer Screening Programme (FNBCSP). Despite national recommendations, this programme coexists with non-negligible opportunistic screening practices. Aim. Analyse socio-territorial inequities in the 2013–2014 FNBCSP campaign in a large sample of the eligible population. Method. Analyses were performed using three-level hierarchical generalized linear model. Level one was a 10% random sample of the eligible population in each département (n = 397,598). For each woman, age and travel time to the nearest accredited radiology centre were computed. These observations were nested within 22,250 residential areas called “Îlots Regroupés pour l’Information Statistique” (IRIS), for which the European Deprivation Index (EDI) is defined. IRIS were nested within 41 départements, for which opportunistic screening rates and gross domestic product based on purchasing power parity were available, deprivation and the number of radiology centres for 100,000 eligible women were computed. Results. Organized screening uptake increased with age (OR1SD = 1.05 [1.04–1.06]) and decreased with travel time (OR1SD = 0.94 [0.93–0.95]) and EDI (OR1SD = 0.84 [0.83–0.85]). Between départements, organized screening uptake decreased with opportunistic screening rate (OR1SD = 0.84 [0.79–0.87]) and départements deprivation (OR1SD = 0.91 [0.88–0.96]). Association between EDI and organized screening uptake was weaker as opportunistic screening rates and as département deprivation increased. Heterogeneity in FNBCSP participation decreased between IRIS by 36% and between départements by 82%. Conclusion. FNBCSP does not erase socio-territorial inequities. The population the most at risk of dying from breast cancer is thus the less participating. More efforts are needed to improve equity.
Collapse
|