Extension of the Dermal Sensitisation Threshold (DST) approach to incorporate chemicals classified as reactive

RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 4-(4-methyl-3-penten-1-yl)-2(5H)-furanone, CAS Registry number 61315-75-1

The existing information supports the use of this material as described in this safety assessment. 4-(4-Methyl-3-penten-1-yl)-2(5H)-furanone was evaluated for genotoxicity, repeated dose toxicity, reproductive toxicity, local respiratory toxicity, photoirritation/photoallergenicity, skin sensitization, and environmental safety. Data show that 4-(4-methyl-3-penten-1-yl)-2(5H)-furanone is not mutagenic. The clastogenicity endpoint was evaluated using the Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) for the genotoxicity endpoint material, and the exposure to 4-(4-methyl-3-penten-1-yl)-2(5H)-furanone is below the TTC (0.0025 μg/kg/day). The repeated dose, reproductive, and local respiratory toxicity endpoints were evaluated using the TTC for a Cramer Class III material, and the exposure to 4-(4-methyl-3-penten-1-yl)-2(5H)-furanone is below the TTC (0.0015 mg/kg/day, 0.0015 mg/kg/day, and 0.47 mg/day, respectively). The skin sensitization endpoint was completed using the Dermal Sensitization Threshold (DST) for reactive materials (64 μg/cm2); exposure is below the DST. The photoirritation/photoallergenicity endpoints were evaluated based on ultraviolet/visible (UV/Vis) spectra; 4-(4-methyl-3-penten-1-yl)-2(5H)-furanone is not expected to be photoirritating/photoallergenic. The environmental endpoints were evaluated; for the hazard assessment based on the screening data, 4-(4-methyl-3-penten-1-yl)-2(5H)-furanone is not Persistent, Bioaccumulative, and Toxic (PBT) as per the International Fragrance Association (IFRA) Environmental Standards. For the risk assessment, 4-(4-methyl-3-penten-1-yl)-2(5H)-furanone was not able to be risk screened as there were no reported volumes of use (VoU) for either North America or Europe in the 2019 IFRA Survey.

Detailed aggregate exposure analysis shows that exposure to fragrance ingredients in consumer products is low: Many orders of magnitude below thresholds of concern

The Research Institute for Fragrance Materials (RIFM) and Creme Global Cremeglobal.com partnered to develop an aggregate exposure model for fragrance ingredients. The model provides a realistic estimate of the total exposure of fragrance ingredients to individuals across a population. The Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) and Dermal Sensitization Threshold (DST) were used to demonstrate the magnitude of low exposure to fragrance materials. The total chronic systemic, inhalation, and dermal 95th percentile exposures on approximately 3000 fragrance ingredients in RIFM's inventory were compared to their respective TTC or DST. Additionally, representative fragrance ingredients were randomly selected and analyzed for exposure distribution by product type (i.e., cosmetic/personal care, household care, oral care, and air care) and route of exposure. It was found that 76 % of fragrance ingredients fall below their respective TTC limits when compared to 95th percentile systemic exposure, while 99 % are below inhalation TTC limits. The lowest 95th percentile aggregate exposure by product type was from household care products, then air care, and oral care products. The highest exposure was from personal care/cosmetic products. The volume of use for most fragrance ingredients (63 %) was <1 metric ton, estimating that environmental exposure to fragrance ingredients is likely low.