[Quality of care among older adults with diabetes mellitus: comparison between community-dwelling adults attended to by home care services and nursing home residents in Dresden]

The prevalence and incidence of pharmacologically treated diabetes among older people receiving home care services in Norway 2009-2014: a nationwide longitudinal study

BACKGROUND

A substantial proportion of older people who receive home care services (HCS) has diabetes and requires diabetes specific monitoring, treatment and self-care assistance. However, the prevalence and incidence rates of diabetes among older people in HCS are poorly described. The aim of the study is to estimate prevalence, incidence and time trends of pharmacologically treated diabetes among older people receiving HCS in Norway 2009-2014.

METHODS

This nationwide observational cohort study is based on data from two population registries. The study population consisted of persons registered in the Norwegian Information System for the Nursing and Care Sector aged ≥ 65 years receiving HCS during at least one of the years 2009-2014. The Norwegian Prescription Database was utilized to identify participants' prescriptions for glucose lowering drugs (GLD). The period prevalence was calculated each year as persons with one or more prescriptions of GLD in the current or previous year. Incident cases were defined as subjects receiving prescriptions of GLD for the first time in the given calendar year if there were no prescriptions of any GLD for that person during the previous two years.

RESULTS

From 2009 to 2014, the number of older people receiving HCS increased from 112,487 to 125,593. The proportion of these who received GLD increased from 14.2% to 15.7% (p < 0.001) and was significantly higher among men than women. The annual incidence rate of diabetes among those receiving HCS showed a decreasing trend from 95.4 to 87.5 cases per 10,000 person-years from 2011 to 2014, but when stratifying on age group and gender, was significant only among the oldest women (age groups 85-89 years and 90 +).

CONCLUSIONS

The increasing prevalence of older people with diabetes who receive HCS highlights the importance of attention to treatment and care related to diabetes in the HCS.

Study protocol for assessing the user acceptance, safety and efficacy of a tablet-based workflow and decision support system with incorporated basal insulin algorithm for glycaemic management in participants with type 2 diabetes receiving home health care: A single-centre, open-label, uncontrolled proof-of-concept study

Introduction

Diabetes management can be especially complex for older adults who receive health care at home. Thus, international guidelines recommend basal-insulin regimens due to simpler handling and low hypoglycaemia risk. A basal-insulin algorithm (including basal-plus) was developed to also include participant's health status and subsequently implemented into a tablet-based workflow and decision support system, GlucoTab@MobileCare. This study protocol describes a proof-of-concept study to investigate user acceptance, safety and efficacy of the GlucoTab@MobileCare system in participants receiving home health care.

Methods

The open-label, single-centre, uncontrolled study will recruit a maximum of ten participants with insulin treated type-2-diabetes (age ≥18 years) who receive home health care. During a three month study period participants will receive basal- or basal-plus-insulin therapy once daily as suggested by the GlucoTab@MobileCare system. Statistical analysis will be conducted on an intention-to-treat basis. The primary endpoint is the percentage of tasks (BG measurements, insulin dose calculations, insulin injections) that were performed according to GlucoTab@MobileCare suggestions relative to the total of suggested tasks. Secondary endpoints include user acceptance, safety and efficacy parameters. The study was approved by the ethics committee and regulatory authorities. Before obtaining written informed consent, all participants will receive oral and written information about all aspects of the study. Results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and at diabetes and geriatric conferences.

Discussion

Potential implications may be improved quality and safety of basal-insulin therapy in older adults as well as support for health-care-providers in daily routine including evidence-based knowledge.

Trial registration

German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00015059);

Prescription Patterns and Disease Control in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients in Nursing Home and Home Care Settings: A Retrospective Analysis in Germany

AIM

The aim of this study was to analyze prescription patterns and disease control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in nursing home and home care settings in Germany.

METHODS

The present study is based on data from the Disease Analyzer database (QuintilesIMS). Patients with an initial diagnosis of T2DM and documented HbA1c values between January 2011 and December 2015 were included in the analysis. The index date corresponded to the last documented HbA1c value. Patients in nursing homes were matched (1:1) with patients living at home based on age, gender, and dementia diagnosis. The first outcome of the study was the share of use of several antidiabetic drugs in the two different settings. The second outcome was the mean HbA1c value and the proportion of patients with HbA1c values lower than 7% in the two different groups.

RESULTS

In this study, 4925 individuals lived in nursing homes and 4925 individuals lived at home. The mean age was 80.7 years (SD = 7.7). Prescription patterns differed significantly between nursing home and home care settings: insulin (57.9% vs 41.1%), metformin (46.6% vs 60.5%), sulfonylurea (24.9% vs 34.2%), DPP4 inhibitors (13.4% vs 19.8%), and other antihyperglycemic drugs (7.8% vs 12.1%). In contrast, mean HbA1c values (nursing home: 7.2%; home: 7.2%) and the share of patients with Hb1Ac values lower than 7% (nursing home: 49.1%; home: 50.9%) did not differ significantly between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the differences in prescription patterns between nursing homes and home care were not associated with significant differences in the management of T2DM.

[Individualized diabetes therapy in older persons]

BACKGROUND

A majority of older people with type 2 diabetes are multimorbid, frail or have limitations in functions. Polypharmacotherapy is unfortunately a frequent occurrence and dangerous. In particular the administration of antihyperglycemic therapy must be carefully weighed up against the risks associated with hypoglycemia.

AIM

The conditions and characteristics of older persons with diabetes are highlighted with respect to the use of individualized therapy of diabetes.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

The advantages and disadvantages of oral antidiabetic agents, insulins and substances with novel active principles, such as gliflozin drugs are discussed. Established oral therapeutic drugs, such as metformin as well as the new substance groups, such as gliptins are advantageous in this patient group. Injection-based therapies with glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) mimetics and the new insulins can also expand the spectrum of therapy if they are prudently used.

Importance of Geriatric Syndromes in Older Patients with Diabetes with de novo Insulin Treatment: The VEGAS Study

Aims

The VEGAS study was conducted to evaluate representative data of de novo insulin-treated older patients with type 2 diabetes in the outpatient setting in Germany.

Methods

In this prospective, multicenter, non-interventional observational study, a nationwide written survey was carried out among practitioners (02/2011–06/2011). Older patients, aged ≥70 years, starting de novo insulin therapy, were documented.

Results

Data from 4,858 patients from about 500 centers (mean age: 78.2 ± 5.4 years; mean glycosylated hemoglobin [HbA_1c]: 70 ± 14.2 mmol/mol [8.6 ± 1.3 %]) were collected. The mean target HbA_1c value was 55 ± 6.6 mmol/mol (7.2 ± 0.6 %). 91.1 % of geriatric patients were multi-morbid. 96.2 % showed at least one physical or psychological geriatric syndrome. Most of the patients were notably impaired according to their age. Conventional insulin therapy and basal-supported oral therapy were the most frequently planned treatment regimens (39.1 and 31.1 %). Important factors in the selection of the insulin treatment regimen were an efficient HbA_1c decrease (65.6 %), easy administration (55.7 %), and also a patient’s ability to self-administer insulin (38.5 %). De novo insulin treatment increased care requirements (22.7 %). 22.3 % of the relatives were scheduled to receive special training. Specific training programs for older patients with diabetes were planned in only 7.3 % of cases.

Conclusions

The data demonstrate the high prevalence of geriatric syndromes during de novo insulin treatment. Individual therapeutic goals and regimes are based on practicability, in particular, the receipt of autonomy and the care requirement. Diabetes education with adapted programs is currently under-represented. Important factors for the choice of an insulin treatment regimen were an efficient HbA_1c decrease, easy administration, and a patient’s ability for self-administration.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40801-015-0014-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

[Diabetes care and incidence of severe hypoglycemia in nursing home facilities and nursing services: The Heidelberg Diabetes Study]

AIM

The goal of this study was to perform a structured analysis of the treatment quality and acute complications of geriatric patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) cared for by nursing services and nursing home facilities. Secondly, structural problems and potentials for improvement in the care of multimorbid older people with DM treated by nursing homes and nursing services were analysed from the viewpoint of geriatric nurses, managers of nursing homes and general practitioners.

METHODS

In all, 77 older persons with DM from 13 nursing homes and 3 nursing services were included in the analysis (76.6% female, HbA1c 6.9 ± 1.4%, age 81.6 ± 9.9 years). Structural problems and potentials for improvement were collected from 95 geriatric nurses, 9 managers of nursing homes and 6 general practitioners using semistandardized questionnaires.

RESULTS

Metabolic control was too strict in care-dependent older people with DM (mean HbA1c value: 6.9 ± 1.4 %; recommended by guidelines: 7-8%). The measurement of HbA1c was performed in 16 of 77 people (20.8%) within the last year despite a high visitation frequency of the general practitioners (12.7 ± 7.7 within the last 6 months). The incidence of severe hypoglycemia was 7.8%/patient/year. Regarding the management in case of diabetes-related acute complications 33 geriatric nurses (34.7%) stated not having any written standard (nursing home 39%, geriatric services 16.7%).

CONCLUSION

Complex insulin therapies are still used in older people with DM with the consequence of a high incidence of severe hypoglycemia. Concrete management standards in the case of diabetes-related acute complications for geriatric nurses are lacking for more than one third of the nursing services.

[Treatment quality in geriatric patients with diabetes mellitus in various home environments]

OBJECTIVE

The goal of the present study was to systematically assess treatment quality, perceptions, and cognitive function of elderly patients with diabetes admitted to an acute geriatric hospital from different home environments (nursing home residents, home care, assisted living, family caregivers, self-sufficient).

METHODS

Quality of diabetes treatment, metabolic control (HbA(1c)), nutrition, treatment satisfaction, cognition, disability, and level of dependency were assessed in 128 patients with diabetes.

RESULTS

Out of 128 patients, 87 patients (68%) showed an HbA1c≤8% according to the guidelines for aging people with diabetes of the German Diabetes Association (DDG). Compared to patients living independently at home, the metabolic control in nursing home residents and their treatment satisfaction were as good. They had a higher degree of dependency though (Barthel, p<0.001), more strongly impaired mobility (Tinetti, p<0.01), less diabetes knowledge (p<0.001), inferior cognitive performance (MMSE, SPMSQ, p<0.01), and a higher prevalence of depression (GDS) (p<0.01). Better cognitive function correlated with better diabetes knowledge (r=0.49; p<0.001), but not with better metabolic control.

CONCLUSION

The treatment of geriatric patients with diabetes mellitus requires individual considerations and interdisciplinary care. Particularly the continuing education of geriatric nurses could contribute to improved diabetes treatment quality in nursing home residents.