One-year outcome after therapy with tissue plasminogen activator: report from the Thrombolysis and Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction trial

Preparation and in vitro evaluation of tissue plasminogen activator-loaded nanoliposomes with anticoagulant coating

The clinical efficacy of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) is limited by its lack of specific delivery, requiring large therapeutic doses that increase the risk of intracerebral hemorrhage, bleeding at the surgical site, and patient mortality after angioplasty. To address these limitations, this study aimed to develop a chitosan polysulfate (CsPs)-coated liposomal formulation for the sustained release of tPA. The CsPs-coated liposomes containing tPA (Liposome-tPA/CsPs) were fabricated using the thin-film hydration technique and their properties were compared to tPA-encapsulated nanoliposomes without a coating layer (Liposome-tPA). Liposome-tPA/CsPs showed a quasi-spherical morphology with a hydrodynamic diameter of 110 nm, while Liposome-tPA had a diameter of 80 nm. The thermal analysis showed that the degradation temperature and glass transition temperature (Tg) of Liposome-tPA/CsPs were higher than that of tPA alone, indicating improved temperature stability. The in vitro release study demonstrated a slow and sustained release of tPA from the Liposome-tPA/CsPs, with a concentration of 0.02 mg/ml at 1 h and 0.23 mg/ml at 180 h. The CsPs coating layer enhanced the antibacterial and antioxidant activity of the nanoliposomes. Liposome-tPA/CsPs exhibited higher cell viability compared to Liposome-tPA. It also achieved a higher percentage of thrombolysis, with complete clot dissolution observed after 3 h of treatment. These findings suggest that the Liposome-tPA/CsPs can be a promising approach to overcome the limitations associated with the systemic administration of tPA, potentially enhancing its clinical efficacy while reducing the risk of adverse events.

The current role of infarct avid imaging

Tc-99m pyrophosphate is the grandfather of infarct avid agents. Its value is its clinical availability and ease of use. However, its shortcomings are the delay of 2 to 3 days for reliable interpretation in nonreperfused myocardial infarction (MI) and the overarching bone activity. Antimyosin provides exquisite specificity for the detection of myocardial necrosis irrespective of the cause of the injury. Therefore, diagnosis of equivocal MI or confirmation of diffuse myocardial necrosis would benefit from the availability of In-111 labeled antimyosin Fab. The drawback of antimyosin, like that of Tc-99m pyrophosphate, is the delay, in this case because of the protracted blood clearance of the antibody protein macromolecules. Tc-99m glucaric acid, on the other hand, may fulfill the original role envisioned for antimyosin, which was to enable early, rapid diagnosis of acute MI. However, the window for the use of Tc-99m glucaric acid appears to be limited to within the first day of the acute event. Therefore, there is a potential use of both Tc-99m glucaric acid and In-111 antimyosin in tandem with Tc-99m glucaric acid, which would not only facilitate early detection and diagnosis of acute MI and diagnosis of equivocal MI, but also may permit stratification of the infarct age.

Risk stratification following myocardial infarction in the thrombolytic era: a two-step strategy using noninvasive and invasive methods

OBJECTIVES

We prospectively performed a two-step risk assessment in patients in the early phase after acute myocardial infarction (MI).

BACKGROUND

Noninvasive methods like Holter electrocardiographic monitoring (HM) and determination of the left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) as well as the invasive technique of programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) have been used to identify patients in the late phase after MI as candidates for prophylactic implantation of a cardioverter/defibrillator. However, it is unclear whether these results can be transferred to patients following acute MI.

METHODS

A series of 657 patients with acute MI (< or = 75 years) underwent HM and EF. If one of the two methods yielded abnormal findings (HM > or = 20 ventricular ectopic beats/h/> or =10 ventricular pairs/day/ventricular tachycardia; EF < or = 40%), PVS was done (abnormal PVS: induction of monomorphic ventricular tachycardia, duration >10 s, cycle length > or = 230 ms).

RESULTS

Of 657 patients, 304 (46%) had either an abnormal HM or EF. The PVS performed in 146 of 304 patients was abnormal in 22. During a mean follow-up of 37 months, there were 106 (16%) deaths, being sudden in 24 (3.6%), nonsudden cardiac in 45 (6.8%). The incidence of arrhythmic events (sudden cardiac death, symptomatic ventricular tachycardia, cardiac arrest) was 18% (4/22) with an abnormal PVS and only 4% (5/124) with a normal PVS (odds ratio 4.0, p=0.032).

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of arrhythmic events is low in post-MI patients in the 1990s. Nevertheless, a two-step risk stratification is helpful in selecting candidates for a defibrillator trial aiming at primary prevention of sudden cardiac death after MI.

[Non-invasive methods for evaluating reperfusion in acute myocardial infarct: enzymes and MIBI-SPECT cardiac gammagraphy]

INTRODUCTION

Several studies point out the importance of what is called rescue angioplasty or fibrinolysis when thrombolysis has been ineffective in acute myocardial infarction. Therefore, it is necessary to make use of new non-invasive methods to asses reperfusion and to safely establish that such a treatment has not been effective.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

We present a work which is based on the assessment of patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with or without fibrinolysis. After determining cardiac enzymatic profiles of creatine kinase and MB isoform (time course, peak, appearance rate constant time-activity: K1). With cardiac imaging gammagraphies 99mTc-isonitrile-single-photon emission computed tomography pre and post treatment after to calculating myocardium at risk, salvage and relationship.

RESULTS

In patients treated with fibrinolysis, the salvage myocardium was higher (8.3% vs 3.0%; p < 0.05). Considering that an improvement in perfusion defect (salvaged myocardium/myocardium at risk) higher than 30% can be viewed as an effective reperfusion, we can see that the percentage in the group treated with fibrinolysis being 45.8%, and the percentage in the group under conventional treatment being just 6.7%. Patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with fibrinolysis show much shorter start of rise-peak time and pain-peak time, all this with very significant differences for the creatine kinase (p < 0.0001) as well as for the MB (p < 0.001). Patients with reperfusion show a rapid increase in activity enzymatic, as demonstrated by the pain-peak time variable and the appearance rate constant time-activity (K1), with very significant differences in the latter (p < 0.0001). In relation with gammagraphy, values of K1 higher or equal to 0.19 for the creatine kinase and 0.14 for the MB isoform, achieved a sensibility of 83% and 91%, and a specificity of 85% and 80% respectively, to asses reperfusion.

CONCLUSION

We think that cardiac imaging gammagraphy with isonitriles as well as as determination of the appearance rate enzymatic constant time-activity, can be useful in monitoring treatment with fibrinolysis in infarction patients. New studies are needed to assess these same aspects, with a lesser number of enzymatic determinations.

Biochemical markers of the acute coronary syndromes

The acute coronary syndromes represent a continuum of myocardial ischemia ranging from angina, reversible tissue injury → unstable angina, frequently associated with minor myocardial damage → myocardial infarction and extensive tissue necrosis. Historically, coronary artery disease assessment has been mainly binary, using WHO criteria of symptoms, electrocardiography, and biochemical markers. The creatine kinase-MB isoenzyme (CK-MB) has been a benchmark for markers, but it is not specific for myocardium. Cardiac-specific isoforms of troponin T and I have emerged as sensitive myocardial infarction (MI) indicators and, importantly, for risk stratification of acute coronary syndrome patients. In addition to markers of myocardial cell necrosis, markers of plaque disruption (C-reactive protein and serum amyloid A), “angry” platelets (P-selectin), ischemia (glycogen phosphorylase-BB isoenzyme), and the procoagulant state and thrombosis (soluble fibrin) have potential use. Also, CK-MB and myoglobin have been combined with clinical indicators for monitoring reperfusion after thrombolytic therapy. Biochemical markers will continue to be an important clinical adjunct for MI diagnosis, risk assessment, and reperfusion monitoring in the future.

Projected cost-effectiveness of primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction under varying assumptions about effectiveness, existing facilities and staffing and volume of services.

BACKGROUND

Primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction has reduced mortality in some studies, but its actual effectiveness may vary, and most U.S. hospitals do not have cardiac catheterization laboratories. Projections of cost-effectiveness in various settings are needed for decisions about adoption.

METHODS

We created a decision analytic model to compare three policies: primary angioplasty, intravenous thrombolysis and no intervention. Probabilities of health outcomes were taken from randomized trials (base case efficacy assumptions) and community-based studies (effectiveness assumptions). The base case analysis assumed that a hospital with an existing laboratory with night/weekend staffing coverage admitted 200 patients with a myocardial infarction annually. In alternative scenarios, a new laboratory was built, and its capacity for elective procedures was either 1) needed or 2) redundant with existing laboratories.

RESULTS

Under base case efficacy assumptions, primary angioplasty resulted in cost savings compared with thrombolysis and had a cost of $12,000/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) saved compared with no intervention. In sensitivity analyses, when there was an existing cardiac catheterization laboratory at a hospital with > or = 200 patients with a myocardial infarction annually, primary angioplasty had a cost of < $30,000/QALY saved under a wide range of assumptions. However, the cost/QALY saved increased sharply under effectiveness assumptions when the hospital had < 150 patients with a myocardial infarction annually or when a redundant laboratory was built.

CONCLUSIONS

At hospitals with an existing cardiac catheterization laboratory, primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction would be cost-effective relative to other medical interventions under a wide range of assumptions. The procedure's relative cost-ineffectiveness at low volumes or redundant laboratories supports regionalization of cardiac services in urban areas. However, approaches to overcoming competitive barriers and close monitoring of outcomes and costs will be needed.

Risk of ventricular arrhythmias in survivors of myocardial infarction

The most recent studies have made it clear that the prognosis of asymptomatic post-MI patients has significantly improved in the last two decades. Holter monitoring as well as a low LVEF still is an important method for the risk stratification in the thrombolytic era of patients with post-MI. Patients with normal noninvasive tests do have a good prognosis. The electrophysiological stimulation seems to be the clinically most valuable single method to predict arrhythmic events. However, as an invasive procedure it is not suitable as a screening test for a large cohort. The stepwise risk stratification technique using first noninvasive followed by invasive procedures seem to be most suitable and effective for identifying asymptomatic infarct survivors which incidence of arrhythmic events is as high as the recurrence rate of patients who had been resuscitated from ventricular fibrillation. Consequently, prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in asymptomatic MI patients, whose positive predictive value is around 30% becomes more and more interesting.

Assessment of coronary reperfusion after thrombolysis with a model combining myoglobin, creatine kinase-MB, and clinical variables. TAMI-7 Study Group. Thrombolysis and Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction-7

BACKGROUND

Several biochemical markers have been investigated for the noninvasive assessment of reperfusion after myocardial infarction. Because myoglobin is released very soon after myocardial injury and clears rapidly after reperfusion, it may prove to be an excellent marker of occlusion and reperfusion.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We examined the relation between various myoglobin measures and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade in 96 patients enrolled in a study of front-loaded thrombolysis who underwent 90-minute angiography. We also combined myoglobin measures with models that include clinical and creatine kinase-MB variables. The myoglobin level measured within 10 minutes of acute angiography showed the best overall performance and was used for later analyses. Of the clinical variables examined, only time from symptom onset to thrombolysis and chest pain grade at angiography discriminated among TIMI flow grades. Combining the 90-minute myoglobin level and these clinical variables showed a significant difference (P<.0001) between both TIMI 3 versus TIMI 0 through 2 and TIMI 2 or 3 versus TIMI 0 or 1 flow. When the 90-minute myoglobin level was added to an established predictive model containing clinical variables and creatine kinase-MB measures, its contribution remained significant (P=.044). The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve for this combined model was .88.

CONCLUSIONS

A single myoglobin measurement obtained 90 minutes after the start of thrombolysis, combined with select clinical variables and creatine kinase-MB levels, enhances the noninvasive prediction of reperfusion after myocardial infarction.

Clinical characteristics and long-term outcome of patients in whom congestive heart failure develops after thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: development of a predictive model

Ischemic heart disease is the most common cause of congestive heart failure, which often begins after acute myocardial infarction. To better delineate the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients in whom congestive heart failure develops after acute myocardial infarction in the thrombolytic era, we prospectively evaluated patients enrolled in six of the TAMI trials. The study cohort comprised 1619 consecutive patients who had at least 1 mm of ST-segment elevation in two contiguous electrocardiographic leads within 6 hours of the onset of acute myocardial infarction and who received intravenous thrombolytic therapy. We prospectively collected clinical characteristics, baseline demographics, acute and 1-week angiographic variables, and in-hospital and 1-year outcome data. We performed stepwise multivariable regression analysis to determine the noninvasive and invasive predictors of the development of in-hospital congestive heart failure. Congestive heart failure developed in 301 patients in the hospital (19% of 1521 patients admitted were not in heart failure). These patients were likely to be older and female, have diabetes mellitus and previous myocardial infarction, and have an anterior wall myocardial infarction. On acute angiography, they had lower ejection fractions and a higher incidence of multivessel disease. Patency at 90 minutes was lower in the patients with congestive heart failure, and acute mitral regurgitation occurred in 1.6% versus 0.21% of patients without congestive heart failure. Patients with congestive heart failure had higher mortality, more in-hospital complications, and longer hospitalizations. At 1-year follow up, 21% of the patients in whom congestive heart failure developed had died versus 5% in the group without congestive heart failure. Predictors of new congestive heart failure included increased age, anterior wall myocardial infarction, lower pulse pressure and systolic blood pressure, diabetes mellitus, and the presence of rales on admission. The acute angiographic variables of reduced ejection fraction, increased number of diseased vessels, and attempted percutaneous intervention improved the concordance of the predictive model by 6%. Congestive heart failure remains a common clinical problem after acute myocardial infarction and is associated with a twofold increase in in-hospital morbidity and a fourfold increase in in-hospital and 1-year mortality. The development of congestive heart failure in the hospital can be predicted from noninvasive and invasive baseline characteristics. We present a simple table to predict congestive heart failure from baseline characteristics and invasive information.

Primary angioplasty and thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction: an evidence summary

Coronary angioplasty is being increasingly used as the primary treatment for patients with acute myocardial infarction, but controversy remains over its potential adoption in preference to thrombolysis as standard care. This report summarizes the published evidence on health outcomes after primary angioplasty compared with thrombolysis or no intervention for patients with acute myocardial infarction. The data tables presented provide the scientific groundwork to assist physicians and other policy-makers in deciding which interventions to provide for broad populations of patients.

Prognostic significance of nonfatal reinfarction during 3-year follow-up: results of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) phase II clinical trial. The TIMI Investigators

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to assess the independent contribution of nonfatal reinfarction to the risk of subsequent death in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing thrombolytic therapy.

BACKGROUND

A composite of "unsatisfactory outcomes" as an end point has increased statistical power and facilitated evaluation of evolving treatment regimens in acute myocardial infarction. The significance of nonfatal reinfarction as a component of a composite end point has not been evaluated in the thrombolytic era.

METHODS

Event rate of nonfatal reinfarction over 3-year follow-up was evaluated in patients with acute myocardial infarction entered into the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Phase II trial. The independent risk of nonfatal reinfarction for subsequent death within various time intervals of follow-up was determined. The mortality rate after nonfatal reinfarction was compared with that of a matched control group.

RESULTS

During 3-year follow-up, 349 of 3,339 patients had a nonfatal reinfarction. Univariate predictors were history (antedating the index event) of angina (p = 0.01), hypertension (p = 0.01), multivessel disease (p = 0.007) and not a current smoker (p = 0.003); the latter was an independent predictor (relative risk [RR] 1.3, 99% confidence interval [CI] 1.0 to 1.8). Forty-three of the 349 patients with a nonfatal reinfarction died: RR for death (vs. patients without a nonfatal reinfarction) was 1.9 (99% CI 1.1 to 3.2) if reinfarction occurred within 42 days of study entry, 6.2 (99% CI 3.0 to 12.9) if reinfarction occurred between 43 and 365 days and 2.9 (99% CI 0.6 to 13.4) if reinfarction occurred between 366 days and 3 years. The cumulative 3-year death rate was 14.1% in patients with a nonfatal reinfarction compared with 7.9% (p < 0.01) in a matched control group. Univariate predictors of death after nonfatal reinfarction were age > or = 65 years (p < 0.001), not low risk category (p = 0.015) and history of heart failure before the index event (p < 0.001). Age > or = 65 years was the only independent predictor (RR 5.4, 99% CI 2.3 to 12.4).

CONCLUSIONS

Nonfatal reinfarction is a strong and independent predictor for subsequent death. It represents a powerful component for a composite end point in patients who received thrombolytic therapy after acute myocardial infarction.

Determinants of 6-month mortality in survivors of myocardial infarction after thrombolysis. Results of the GISSI-2 data base. The Ad hoc Working Group of the Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell'Infarto Miocardico (GISSI)-2 Data Base

BACKGROUND

Current knowledge of risk assessment in survivors of myocardial infarction is largely based on data gathered before the advent of thrombolysis. It must be determined whether and to what extent available information and proposed criteria of prognostication are applicable in the thrombolytic era.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We reassessed risk prediction in the 10,219 survivors of myocardial infarction with follow-up data available (ie, 98% of the total) who had been enrolled in the GISSI-2 trial, relying on a set of prespecified variables. The 3.5% 6-month all-cause mortality rate of these patients compared with the higher value of 4.6% found in the corresponding GISSI-1 cohort, originally allocated to streptokinase therapy, indicates a 24% reduction in postdischarge 6-month mortality. On multivariate analysis (Cox model), the following variables were predictors of 6-month all-cause mortality: ineligibility for exercise test for both cardiac (relative risk [RR], 3.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.36-4.62) and noncardiac reasons (RR, 3.28; 95% CI, 2.23-4.72), early left ventricular failure (RR, 2.41; 95% CI, 1.87-3.09), echocardiographic evidence of recovery phase left ventricular dysfunction (RR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.78-2.98), advanced (more than 70 years) age (RR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.43-2.30), electrical instability (ie, frequent and/or complex ventricular arrhythmias) (RR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.32-2.19), late left ventricular failure (RR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.17-2.03), previous myocardial infarction (RR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.14-1.89), and a history of treated hypertension (RR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.05-1.65). Early post-myocardial infarction angina, a positive exercise test, female sex, history of angina, history of insulin-dependent diabetes, and anterior site of myocardial infarction were not risk predictors. On further multivariate analysis, performed on 8315 patients with the echocardiographic indicator of left ventricular dysfunction available, only previous myocardial infarction was not retained as an independent risk predictor.

CONCLUSIONS

A decline in 6-month mortality of myocardial infarction survivors, seen within 6 hours of symptom onset, has been observed in recent years. Ineligibility for exercise test, early left ventricular failure, and recovery-phase left ventricular dysfunction are the most powerful (RR, > 2) predictors of 6-month mortality among patients recovering from myocardial infarction after thrombolysis. Qualitative variables reflecting residual myocardial ischemia do not appear to be risk predictors. The lack of an independent adverse influence of early post-myocardial infarction angina on 6-month survival represents a major difference between this study and those of the prethrombolytic era.

Analysis of creatine kinase, CK-MB, myoglobin, and troponin T time-activity curves for early assessment of coronary artery reperfusion after intravenous thrombolysis

BACKGROUND

Thrombolysis has become the standard therapeutic approach in patients with acute myocardial infarction. To identify patients who may benefit from early invasive procedures, reliable noninvasive assessment of success or failure of thrombolytic therapy is mandatory.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In a prospective study in 63 consecutive patients undergoing thrombolysis for their first myocardial infarction, serial measurements of creatine kinase (CK), its isoenzyme CK-MB, myoglobin, and troponin T were done to determine their value for noninvasive prediction of coronary artery patency. Blood samples were drawn every 15 minutes during the first 90 minutes, every 30 minutes during the first 4 hours, every 4 hours during the first 24 hours, and every 8 hours during the first 72 hours. The perfusion status of the infarct-related artery was assessed angiographically 90 minutes after initiation of thrombolysis. For each marker, time to its peak concentration and its early initial slope (start of thrombolysis to 90 minutes thereafter) were determined. Areas under receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were 0.83, 0.76, 0.82, and 0.80 for maxima of CK, CK-MB, myoglobin, and troponin T, respectively (p = NS by univariate Z test). The corresponding values for early slopes of CK, CK-MB, myoglobin, and troponin T were 0.79, 0.82, 0.89, and 0.80 (p = 0.23 for comparison between myoglobin and CK-MB; p = 0.07 between myoglobin and CK). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values regarding noninvasive prediction of coronary artery patency after 90 minutes were 80%, 82%, 95%, and 61% for time to CK maximum; 91%, 77%, 91%, and 77% for time to myoglobin maximum; 87%, 71%, 89%, and 67% for early CK slope; and 94%, 88%, 94%, and 82% for myoglobin slope, respectively. When myoglobin slope was assessed together with other clinical reperfusion markers (resolution of chest pain or ST segment elevation, occurrence of reperfusion arrhythmias) by logistic regression analysis, only the myoglobin slope was an independent predictor of coronary artery patency (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

With regard to noninvasive prediction of coronary artery patency after thrombolytic therapy, measurement of the early initial slopes of the serum markers within only 90 minutes after the initiation of therapy is as accurate as the determination of the time to their peak concentration. Compared with the other markers examined, myoglobin appears to have advantages because of its earlier rise, yielding a better negative predictive value and a higher area under the ROC curve for determination of its early initial slopes.

Clinical benefits of thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction

The value of coronary artery reperfusion resulting from pharmacologically induced fibrinolysis in patients with evolving myocardial infarction has been rigorously evaluated. Improved left ventricular function and even more impressive improvements in survival rates have been demonstrated consistently in controlled studies. Benefit is related to the restoration of myocardial blood flow. Maximal benefit is achieved with early and sustained restoration of coronary artery patency. Benefits observed during initial hospitalization are sustained for at least 1 year in the majority of patients, even without subsequent mechanical revascularization. To date, analysis of subgroups has not identified a population of patients with evolving infarction that should routinely be excluded from consideration for thrombolysis. As with many potent pharmacologic agents, activators of the fibrinolytic system are associated with a degree of risk whenever they are administered to a patient. Therefore, patients must be assessed carefully prior to initiating treatment, especially for potential bleeding hazards, and appropriate follow-up evaluation and concomitant therapy needs to be planned. However, given the overwhelming body of data now available regarding its benefits and relative safety, thrombolysis should be considered as conventional therapy for patients with acute evolving myocardial infarction (AMI).

Evaluation of combination thrombolytic therapy and timing of cardiac catheterization in acute myocardial infarction. Results of thrombolysis and angioplasty in myocardial infarction--phase 5 randomized trial. TAMI Study Group

Recent trials of myocardial reperfusion using single-agent thrombolytic therapy and sequential cardiac catheterization have supported a conservative approach to the patient with acute myocardial infarction. To evaluate combination thrombolytic therapy and the role of a previously untested strategy for the aggressive use of cardiac catheterization, we performed a multicenter clinical trial with a 3 x 2 factorial design in which 575 patients were randomly allocated to one of three drug regimens--tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) (n = 191), urokinase (n = 190), or both (n = 194) - and one of two catheterization strategies--immediate catheterization with angioplasty for failed thrombolysis (n = 287) or deferred predischarge catheterization on days 5-10 (n = 288). Patients with contraindications to thrombolytic therapy, cardiogenic shock, or age of more than 75 years were excluded. Global left ventricular ejection fraction was well preserved and almost identical at predischarge catheterization (54%), regardless of the catheterization or thrombolytic strategy used (p = 0.98). Combination thrombolytic therapy was associated with a less complicated clinical course, most clearly documented by a lower rate of reocclusion (2%) compared with urokinase (7%) and t-PA (12%) (p = 0.04) and a lower rate of recurrent ischemia (25%) compared with urokinase (35%) and t-PA (31%). When a composite clinical end point (e.g., death, stroke, reinfarction, reocclusion, heart failure, or recurrent ischemia) was examined, combination thrombolytic therapy was associated with greater freedom from any adverse event (68%) compared with either single agent (urokinase, 55%; t-PA, 60%) (p = 0.04) and with a less complicated clinical course when the composite clinical end points were ranked according to clinical severity (p = 0.024). Early patency rates were greater with combination therapy, although predischarge patency rates after considering interventions to maintain patency were similar among drug regimens. No difference in bleeding complication rates was observed with any thrombolytic regimen. The aggressive catheterization strategy led to an overall early patency rate of 96% and a predischarge patency rate of 94% compared with a 90% predischarge patency in the conservative strategy (p = 0.065). The aggressive strategy improved regional wall motion in the infarct region (-2.16 SDs/chord) compared with deferred catheterization (-2.49 SDs/chord) (p = 0.004). More patients treated with the aggressive strategy were free from adverse outcomes (67% versus 55% in the conservative strategy, p = 0.004), and the clinical course was less complicated when the adverse outcomes were ranked according to severity (p = 0.016). No significant increase in use of blood products resulted from the aggressive strategy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Two-year outcome after angiographically documented myocardial reperfusion for acute coronary occlusion. Thrombolysis and Angioplasty Study Group

Reperfusion therapy has been clearly shown to decrease the early mortality after acute myocardial infarction, but the impact of this therapy on long-term survival has been less extensively evaluated. This study reports the extended follow-up of a large cohort of 810 patients treated with intravenous thrombolytic therapy combined, when considered necessary to maintain or augment infarct vessel patency, with mechanical reperfusion therapies. Each patient underwent coronary angiography within 2 hours of the initiation of the thrombolytic infusion. Coronary angioplasty was performed in 62% of the patients before hospital discharge and 21% underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Follow-up was obtained in 96% to a mean of 18.8 months (range, 1.5 to 48 months). All-cause mortality over this period was 3.3%; 2.1% died from cardiac causes. Nonfatal reinfarction occurred in 5.1%. Although the low event rate limits the validity of statistical comparisons, the patients who survived the follow-up period tended to be younger (56 +/- 10 vs 65 +/- 7 years), to have better predischarge left ventricular function (left ventricular ejection fraction, 52 +/- 11 vs 46 +/- 13%) and to have a lower prevalence of multivessel coronary artery disease (45 vs 67%). This excellent long-term survival may, in part, reflect the exclusion of high-risk patients from enrollment in the Thrombolysis and Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (TAMI) studies. It may also be attributable, however, to the frequent use of combined thrombolysis and mechanical revascularization in this population.