Clinical characteristics and possible mechanism of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation induced by intracoronary injection of acetylcholine

Drug-induced atrial fibrillation. A narrative review of a forgotten adverse effect

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia and is associated with an increased morbidity and mortality. There is clinical evidence that an increasing number of cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular drugs, mainly anticancer drugs, can induce AF either in patients with or without pre-existing cardiac disorders, but drug-induced AF (DIAF) has not received the attention that it might deserve. In many cases DIAF is asymptomatic and paroxysmal and patients recover sinus rhythm spontaneously, but sometimes, DIAF persists, and it is necessary to perform a cardioversion. Furthermore, DIAF is not mentioned in clinical guidelines on the treatment of AF. The risk of DIAF increases in elderly and in patients treated with polypharmacy and with risk factors and comorbidities that commonly coexist with AF. This is the case of cancer patients. Under these circumstances ascribing causality of DIAF to a given drug often represents a clinical challenge. We review the incidence, the pathophysiological mechanisms, risk factors, clinical relevance, and treatment of DIAF. Because of the limited information presently available, further research is needed to obtain a deeper insight into DIAF. Meanwhile, it is important that clinicians are aware of the problem that DIAF represents, recognize which drugs may cause DIAF, and consider the possibility that a drug may be responsible for a new-onset AF episode.

Drug-Induced Atrial Fibrillation / Atrial Flutter

Drug-induced atrial fibrillation / flutter (DIAF) is a serious and potentially life-threatening complication of pharmacotherapy. Purpose of the work: systematization and analysis of scientific literature data on drugs, the use of which can cause the development of DIAF, as well as on epidemiology, pathophysiological mechanisms, risk factors, clinical picture, diagnosis and differential diagnosis, treatment and prevention of DIAF. Analysis of the literature has shown that many groups of drugs can cause the development of DIAF, with a greater frequency while taking anticancer drugs, drugs for the treatment of the cardiovascular, bronchopulmonary and central nervous systems. The mechanisms and main risk factors for the development of DIAF have not been finally established and are known only for certain drugs, therefore, this section requires further study. The main symptoms of DIAF are due to the severity of tachycardia and their influence on the parameters of central hemodynamics. For diagnosis, it is necessary to conduct an electrocardiogram (ECG) and Holter monitoring of an ECG and echocardiography. Differential diagnosis should be made with AF, which may be caused by other causes, as well as other rhythm and conduction disturbances. Successful treatment of DIAF is based on the principle of rapid recognition and immediate discontinuation of drugs (if possible), the use of which potentially caused the development of adverse drug reactions (ADR). The choice of management strategy: heart rate control or rhythm control, as well as the method of achievement (medication or non-medication), depends on the specific clinical situation. For the prevention of DIAF, it is necessary to instruct patients about possible symptoms and recommend self-monitoring of the pulse. It is important for practitioners to be wary of the risk of DIAF due to the variety of drugs that can potentially cause this ADR.

Intracoronary acetylcholine testing among 746 consecutive Japanese patients with angina-like chest pain and unobstructed coronary artery disease

Aims 

Intracoronary acetylcholine (ACh) testing is useful for the detection of epicardial spasm (ES) and coronary microvascular spasm (CMS). We retrospectively analysed the incidence of ES and CMS in consecutive Japanese patients with unobstructed coronary artery disease.

Methods and results

From January 1991 to February 2019, we performed intracoronary ACh testing of 1864 patients. Among these patients, a total of 746 consecutive patients (254 women, mean age 64 ± 11 years) who underwent first diagnostic angiography for suspected myocardial ischaemia and had unobstructed coronary arteries (<50%) were enrolled. Epicardial spasm was defined as ≥90% stenosis and usual chest symptoms and ischaemic ECG changes, while CMS was defined as <75% stenosis and usual chest symptoms and ischaemic ECG changes. We performed intracoronary ACh testing on both coronary arteries in 96% (716/746) of all subjects. Overall, ES was found in 329 patients (44%), whereas CMS was revealed in 40 patients (5%) including 4 patients with coexisting ES. In patients with ES, women made up 22%, and approximately three-quarters of the patients had resting chest pain. In contrast, women composed 65% (26/40) of those with CMS, and 15 patients with CMS had another chest symptom. Coronary microvascular spasm was frequently observed in the left coronary artery (LCA) but not the right coronary artery. Electrical cardioversion was necessary for two patients.

Conclusions 

Coronary microvascular spasm was recognized in only 5% of consecutive Japanese patients with unobstructed coronary artery disease, whereas ES was revealed in 44% of those patients. Coronary microvascular spasm was often observed in women and in the LCA.

Coincidence between spontaneous and inducible coronary spasm: acetylcholine test is clinically valued for diagnosing coronary spasm

There is no report regarding the correlation between spontaneous documented coronary spasm and acetylcholine (ACh)-inducible spasm. We retrospectively analyzed the coincidence between angiographical spontaneous coronary spasm and ACh-inducible spasm in the same patients. We recruited 28 patients with 30 angiographical spontaneous coronary spasm in 6009 patients with diagnostic and follow-up coronary arteriography from Jan 1991 and Mar 2019 in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. We could perform intracoronary ACh testing in 19 patients with 20 vessels. ACh was injected in incremental dose of 20/50/100 μg into the left coronary artery and 20/50/80 μg into the right coronary artery. Positive spasm was defined as > 90% stenosis and ischemic ECG changes. Angiographical documented spontaneous coronary spasm was observed in 0.47% (28/6009) of patients with diagnostic and follow-up coronary angiography. Intracoronary administration of ACh reproduced 15 spontaneous coronary spasm and no provoked spasm was observed in the remaining 5 vessels due to the administration of nitroglycerine or under medications. Spasm-provoked sites by ACh tests and ACh-inducible spasm configurations were almost similar to spontaneous spasm. Coincidence of provoked spasm site (93.3% vs. 6.7%, p < 0.001) and spasm configuration (93.3% vs. 6.7%, p < 0.001) was markedly higher than discordance. Intracoronary ACh testing can reproduce spontaneous coronary artery spasm in 75% of vessels with almost similar sites and same morphological characteristics irrespective of the administration of nitroglycerine or vasodilators. ACh test is a reliable method to document coronary artery spasm in the clinic.

Bronchial Asthma and Rest Angina: Is It Safe to Perform Acetylcholine Spasm Provocation Tests in These Patients?

Objective Acetylcholine (ACh) use in patients with bronchial asthma (BA) is contraindicated. We examined the clinical usefulness and safety of ACh spasm provocation tests in rest angina patients with BA. Patients The study subjects were 495 rest angina patients (mean age: 64.4±10.9 years old, male: 81.0%). Organic stenosis was found in 69 patients (13.9%). Methods We investigated 495 rest angina patients who underwent ACh spasm provocation tests. ACh was injected in incremental doses of 20/50/100/200 μg into the left coronary artery and 20/50/80 μg into the right coronary artery. Provoked positive spasm was defined as transient ≥90% luminal narrowing and usual chest pain or ischemic electrocardiogram changes. Results Among 495 rest angina patients, 13 (2.6%) were complicated with BA. Eleven patients with BA were controlled under medications, and two patients had a history of medication for BA. The clinical characteristics were not markedly different between rest angina patients with and without BA. The rate of multi-vessel spasm was markedly higher in patients with BA than that in those without BA. No complications during ACh spasm provocation tests were recognized in rest angina patients with BA, whereas major complications in those without BA were observed in eight patients including two ventricular fibrillations, three non-sustained ventricular tachycardias, and three shocks. We were able to perform all 495 ACh spasm provocation tests without any irreversible complications, while electrical defibrillation was necessary for 2 patients without BA. Conclusion We were able to perform ACh spasm provocation tests in rest angina patients with BA irrespective of the off-label use of ACh.

Pharmacological spasm provocation testing in 2500 patients: provoked spasm incidence, complications and cardiac events

Pharmacological spasm provocation tests such as acetylcholine (ACh) and ergonovine (ER) had been performed in the clinic. We retrospectively analyzed the incidence of provoked spasm, complications during testing and the cardiac events after these tests. From January 1991 and October 2018, we performed pharmacological spasm provocation tests in 2500 patients: 1810 ACh tests, 1232 ER tests, 542 both tests, and 310 ACh added after ER tests. ACh was injected in incremental doses of 20/50/100/200 μg into the LCA and 20/50/80 μg into the RCA. ER was administered as a total dose of 64 μg into the LCA and 40 μg into the RCA. When adding ACh after ER, the total dose was 50/80 μg into the RCA and 100/200 μg into the LCA. Positive spasm was defined as ≥ 90% stenosis and usual chest pain or ischemic ECG changes. Mean follow-up duration was 47.5 ± 29.9 months. Overall, provoked positive spasm was found in 1095 patients (43.8%). The incidence of positive provoked spasm during ACh testing was significantly higher than that during other tests (ACh: 48.7% vs. ER: 28.9%, Both: 24%, ACh added after ER: 33.5%, p < 0.001). Multiple spasms were remarkably more frequent during ACh testing compared with the other 3 types of testing (ACh: 28.2% vs. ER: 7.4%, Both: 4.1%, ACh added after ER: 13.2%, p < 0.001). No death or acute myocardial infarction was observed, while major complications during ACh testing were significantly more frequent than during ER testing. Readmission due to recurrent angina pectoris in spasm-positive patients was remarkably more frequent than in spasm-negative patients. The incidence of sudden cardiac death, ventricular fibrillation, and acute coronary syndrome were not different between the spasm-positive and spasm-negative groups during the follow-up periods. We could perform all spasm provocation tests without any irreversible complications. All sequential spasm provocation tests were useful for documenting coronary spasm.

Dose-Response Relationship Between Intracoronary Acetylcholine and Minimal Lumen Diameter in Coronary Endothelial Function Testing of Women and Men With Angina and No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

BACKGROUND

Intracoronary acetylcholine (Ach) provocation testing is the gold standard for assessing coronary endothelial function. However, dosing regimens of Ach are quite varied in the literature, and there are limited data evaluating the optimal dose. We evaluated the dose-response relationship between Ach and minimal lumen diameter (MLD) by sex and studied whether incremental intracoronary Ach doses given during endothelial function testing improve its diagnostic utility.

METHODS

We evaluated 65 men and 212 women with angina and no obstructive coronary artery disease who underwent endothelial function testing using the highest tolerable dose of intracoronary Ach, up to 200 μg. Epicardial endothelial dysfunction was defined as a decrease in MLD >20% after intracoronary Ach by quantitative coronary angiography. We used a linear mixed effects model to evaluate the dose-response relationship. Deming regression analysis was done to compare the %MLD constriction after incremental doses of intracoronary Ach.

RESULTS

The mean age was 53.5 years. Endothelial dysfunction was present in 186 (68.1%). Among men with endothelial dysfunction, there was a significant decrease in MLD/10 µg of Ach at doses above 50 μg and 100 µg, while this decrease in MLD was not observed in women (P<0.001). The %MLD constriction at 20 μg versus 50 μg and 50 μg versus 100 μg were not equivalent while the %MLD constriction at 100 μg versus 200 μg were equivalent.

CONCLUSIONS

Women and men appear to have different responses to Ach during endothelial function testing. In addition to having a greater response to intracoronary Ach at all doses, men also demonstrate an Ach-MLD dose-response relationship with doses up to 200 μg, while women have minimal change in MLD with doses above 50 µg. An incremental dosing regimen during endothelial function testing appears to improve the diagnostic utility of the test and should be adjusted based on the sex of the patient.

Clinical characteristics in patients with rest angina and hypoplastic right coronary artery

Hypoplastic coronary artery disease is a rare congenital abnormality reported to be associated with myocardial infarction and sudden cardiac death. Provoked positive spasm in the left circumflex coronary artery (LCX) with pharmacological spasm provocation tests was remarkably lower than other coronary arteries. We sometimes encountered patients with rest angina and hypoplastic right coronary artery (H-RCA). Among 5953 patients with diagnostic and follow-up coronary arteriography, we found 93 patients (1.6%) with H-RCA. During the same period, we could perform spasm provocation tests in 564 patients with rest angina including 13 patients with H-RCA and 249 patients with effort angina including 10 patients with H-RCA. Pharmacological spasm provocation tests were performed in 51 of 93 patients including 34 patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD) and 17 patients with non-IHD. Provoked spasm incidence in patients with IHD was higher than in those with non-IHD but not significant (52.9% vs. 29.4%, p = 0.1114). Provoked positive spasm in the LCX in patients with rest angina and H-RCA was significantly higher than that in those without H-RCA (69.2% vs. 23.4%, p < 0.001). Provoked spasm on both left anterior descending artery and LCX in patients with rest angina and H-RCA was also remarkably higher than in those without H-RCA (53.8% vs. 3.1%, p < 0,001). There were no clinical differences between patients with and without H-RCA rest angina. Two-vessel spasm (61.5% vs. 0%, p < 0.01) and LCX-provoked spasm (69.2% vs. o%, p < 0.01) were significantly higher in patients with H-RCA and rest angina than that in those with H-RCA and effort angina. In patients with rest angina and H-RCA, LCX-positive spasm was significantly higher and these patients may have a potential of high disease activity in the clinic as a coronary spastic angina.

Acetylcholine spasm provocation test by trans-radial artery and brachial vein approach

BACKGROUND

Temporary pace maker is necessary because of transient block or bradycardia during the intracoronary acetylcholine spasm provocation tests based on the Japanese Circulation Society guidelines.

OBJECTIVES

We examined the feasibility and safety of the acetylcholine spasm provocation test via the radial artery and brachial vein approach.

METHODS

We tried to perform the acetylcholine spasm provocation tests in 252 patients via the radial artery and brachial vein approach procedures during 5 years. Acetylcholine was injected in incremental doses of 20/50/80 μg into the right coronary artery (RCA) and 20/50/100/200 μg into the left coronary artery (LCA). Back-up pacing rate was set at 40 beats/min. Positive spasm was defined as transient ≥90% luminal narrowing and ischemic electrocardiographic change or usual chest pain.

RESULTS

The procedure success of radial artery and brachial vein access was 94.4% (238/252) and 93.3% (235/252), respectively. We performed 221 patients (87.7%) with acetylcholine tests by radial artery and brachial vein approach. We changed to the brachial approach due to the failures of radial artery access in 14 patients. We also changed to the femoral vein in 11 patients and internal jugular vein in two patients. Back-up pace maker rhythm was observed in 92.1% (232/252) of all study patients, while it was significantly higher in the RCA testing than that in the LCA tests (84.9% (191/225) vs. 52.2% (131/251), P < 0.001). No irreversible complication was found.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend the radial artery and brachial vein approach for safety and convenience when performing the acetylcholine spasm provocation tests.

Catheter-induced Spasm in the Proximal Right Coronary Artery

Objectives The clinical characteristics in patients with catheter-induced spasm in the proximal right coronary artery (RCA) are controversial. We performed a clinical analysis of catheter-induced spasm in the RCA. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 5,296 consecutive patients who underwent diagnostic or follow-up angiography during a 26-year period. During this period, we found 40 patients with catheter-induced spasm in the RCA. We compared the clinical characteristics and procedures of cardiac catheterization in patients with catheter-induced spasm in the RCA with those in patients without such spasm. Results The frequency of catheter-induced spasm in the RCA was 0.75% (40/5,296). We performed pharmacological spasm provocation tests in 36 of 40 patients after spasm relief. Positive spasm was observed in 32 patients (88.9%), and 25 patients (78.1%) had multiple spasms. The catheter procedures, including the approach sites (radial/brachial/femoral), catheter size (4/5/6Fr) and catheter type (Judkins right/Sones/Shared/Judkins left 3.5/Amplatz) were not markedly different between the two groups. A multivariate analysis showed that positive spasm [odds ratio (OR): 7.030, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.920-25.700], a younger age (OR: 0.937, 95% CI: 0.910-0.965) and diabetes mellitus (OR: 0.278, 95% CI: 0.083-0.928) were the determinant factors for the catheter-induced spasm. Conclusion Approximately 80% of patients with catheter-induced spasm in the proximal RCA had coronary spastic angina. Positive provoked spasm was the most powerful determinant factor for catheter-induced spasm.

The acetylcholine administration time plays the key role for provoked spasm in the spasm provocation test

BACKGROUND

Acetylcholine (ACh) was administered for 3min in the ENCORE study, while the Japanese Circulation Society guidelines recommended the 20s ACh injection as an ACh test.

OBJECTIVES

We compared the ischemic findings between ACh administration for 3min and ACh injection for 20s in the same patients and in the same ACh doses without administration of nitrates in the left coronary artery.

METHODS

We investigated 30 patients with ischemic heart disease (25 men, 67±10 years, ACh 50μg: 3, ACh 100μg: 9, ACh 200μg: 18) by the above two ACh injection procedures. Temporary pacemaker was inserted and set at the rate of 40/min. Positive provoked spasm was defined as transient ≥90% narrowing and typical chest symptoms or ischemic electrocardiographic (ECG) changes.

RESULTS

Provoked spasm was observed in 22 patients with ACh 20s injection, while 10 patients had provoked spasm by ACh 3min administration (73.3% vs. 33.3%, p<0.05). Ischemic ECG changes (50.0% vs. 23.3%, p<0.05) and chest symptoms (73.3% vs. 43.3%, p<0.05) were significantly higher with ACh 20s injection than ACh 3min administration. Pacemaker rhythm was recognized in 19 patients with ACh 20s injection, whereas 7 patients with ACh 3min administration had a pacemaker rhythm (63.3% vs. 23.3%, p<0.01). Maximal ST elevation by ACh 20s injection was significantly higher than that by ACh 3min administration (0.47±0.94 vs. 0.13±0.51, p<0.05), while maximal ST depression was not different between the two procedures. Coronary artery diameter after ACh 20s injection was significantly lower than that after ACh 3min administration in the left anterior descending artery.

CONCLUSIONS

ACh administration procedures (3min or 20s injection) may influence the ischemic findings in spasm provocation testing.

The Human Microcirculation: Regulation of Flow and Beyond

The microcirculation is responsible for orchestrating adjustments in vascular tone to match local tissue perfusion with oxygen demand. Beyond this metabolic dilation, the microvasculature plays a critical role in modulating vascular tone by endothelial release of an unusually diverse family of compounds including nitric oxide, other reactive oxygen species, and arachidonic acid metabolites. Animal models have provided excellent insight into mechanisms of vasoregulation in health and disease. However, there are unique aspects of the human microcirculation that serve as the focus of this review. The concept is put forth that vasculoparenchymal communication is multimodal, with vascular release of nitric oxide eliciting dilation and preserving normal parenchymal function by inhibiting inflammation and proliferation. Likewise, in disease or stress, endothelial release of reactive oxygen species mediates both dilation and parenchymal inflammation leading to cellular dysfunction, thrombosis, and fibrosis. Some pathways responsible for this stress-induced shift in mediator of vasodilation are proposed. This paradigm may help explain why microvascular dysfunction is such a powerful predictor of cardiovascular events and help identify new approaches to treatment and prevention.

Sequential spasm provocation tests might overcome a limitation of the standard spasm provocation tests

OBJECTIVE

We examined the clinical usefulness of sequential spasm provocation tests as follows: first, acetylcholine (ACh) test, second, ergonovine (ER) test, and finally, the ACh test following the ER test.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed the ACh and ER tests in 461 patients (294 men, 64.4±11.3 years of age) during a 23-year period. In addition, we administered an intracoronary injection of ACh after the ER tests in 240 patients. First, ACh [right coronary artery (RCA): 20/50/(80) μg, left coronary artery (LCA): 20/50/100/(200) μg] was administered incrementally over 20 s. Second, ER (RCA: 40 μg, LCA: 64 μg) was administered over 2-4 min. If a provoked spasm did not occur, we administered an intracoronary injection of ACh (50/80 μg into the RCA and 100/200 μg into the LCA) just after the ER tests. A positive spasm was defined as more than 99% transient luminal narrowing.

RESULTS

A positive spasm was observed in 221 (47.9%) patients including 181 ACh-positive (39.3%) and 119 ER-positive (25.8%) patients by the ACh or ER tests. In the 240 patients with a negative spasm in the ACh and ER tests, 48 (10.4%) patients developed provoked spasms on adding ACh after the ER test. The distributions of various cardiac disorders and provoked spasm vessels were similar among the three positive groups. Focal spasm was frequently observed in the ER-positive group, whereas diffuse spasm was frequently obtained in the ACh-positive group and by adding ACh after ER in the positive group. No major complications were recognized during the sequential spasm provocation tests.

CONCLUSION

Sequential spasm provocation tests might overcome a limitation of standard spasm provocation tests.

One of six patients with non-ischemic heart disease exhibit provoked coronary spasms: non-ischemic heart disease associated with ischemia?

OBJECTIVE

The majority of cardiologists do not perform spasm provocation tests in patients with non-ischemic heart disease (non-IHD) or non-obstructive coronary artery disease (non-ob-CAD). We herein examined the frequency of provoked spasms in non-IHD and non-ob-CAD patients, including those with atypical chest pain (Aty), valvular heart disease (Val), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), congestive heart failure (CHF), and others (Oth).

METHODS & RESULTS

We performed acetylcholine (ACh) spasm provocation tests over a period of 22 years (1991-2012) among 1,440 patients, including 981 IHD and 459 non-IHD subjects. A total of 43 patients with significant organic stenosis were excluded, and the remaining 416 patients with non-IHD or non-ob-CAD disease were assessed. ACh was injected in incremental doses of 20/50/80 μg into the right coronary artery (RCA) and 20/50/100/(200) μg into the left coronary artery (LCA). Positive coronary spasms were defined as transient luminal narrowing of >99%. Positive coronary spasms were noted in 17.3% of the non-IHDs patients (72/416), compared to 11.4% (15/132), 19% (8/42), 16.7% (5/30), 23.9% (16/67), and 19.3% (28/145), in the patients in the Aty, Val, HCM, CHF, and Oth groups, respectively. The rate of positive provoked spasms was higher in men than women, although not significantly [20.6% (46/223) vs. 13.4% (26/193), ns], and significantly higher in the late period (2001-2012) than in the early period (1991-2000) (36.8% vs. 7.0%, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Physicians should perform spasm provocation tests in patients with IHD as well as non-IHD with non-ob-CAD, as one of six non-IHD patients in this study exhibited provoked coronary spasms.

Gender differences in sensitivity of acetylcholine and ergonovine to coronary spasm provocation test

We examined the sex difference concerning the coronary artery response between ACh and ER in this study. We already reported the difference of coronary response between acetylcholine (ACh) and ergonovine (ER). We performed both ACh and ER tests of 461 patients (male 294 patients, female 167 patients, mean age 64.4 ± 11.3 years) during 23 years. Positive coronary spasm was defined as >99 % transient luminal narrowing with usual chest pain and/or ischemic ECG changes. Firstly, ACh was administered in incremental doses of 20/50/(80) μg into the RCA and 20/50/100/(200) μg into the LCA over 20 s. Secondly, ER was administered in a total dose of 40 μg into the RCA and of 64 μg into the LCA over 2-4 min. Intracoronary injection of ACh and ER provoked spasm in 221 patients consisting of 160 male patients and 61 female patients. In female patients, the spasm provoked by ACh was almost perfect except in two patients (59 patients, 96.7 %), while ER provoked spasm in only 20 patients (32.8 %). In male patients, provoked spasm by ACh (129 patients, 80.6 %) was significantly higher than ER (97 patients, 60.6 %). As a spasm provocation test, ACh is more sensitive than ER in both sexes and especially in females. We may select two pharmacological agents by sex differences to provoke coronary artery spasm in the cardiac catheterization laboratory in the future.

Safety and optimal protocol of provocation test for diagnosis of multivessel coronary spasm

We examined the safety of acetylcholine (ACh) and ergonovine (ER) tests retrospectively and investigated the optimal protocol of provocation test for diagnosis of multivessel coronary spasm. We performed 1546 ACh tests and 1114 ER tests during 23 years. ACh was injected in incremental doses of 20/50/80 μg into the right coronary artery (RCA) and of 20/50/100/200 μg into the left coronary artery (LCA) over 20 s. ER was administered in total doses of 40 μg into the RCA and of 64 μg into the LCA over 2-4 min. When a coronary spasm was induced and did not resolve spontaneously within 3 min after the completion of ACh/ER injection, or when hemodynamic instability due to coronary spasms occurred, 2.5-5.0 mg of nitrate was administered into the responsible vessel. To relive provoked spasm, it is necessary to administer nitrate in 31 cases by ACh and in 76 cases by ER (2.0 vs. 6.8 %, p < 0.01) before another vessel attempts. Multivessel spasms were often observed in LCA testing than in RCA testing on both agents [ACh: 78.6 % (11/14) vs. 11.8 % (2/17), p < 0.001, ER: 37.8 % (14/37) vs. 20.5 % (8/39), ns]. Even after the administration of nitrates, positive coronary spasm was obtained in 21.1 % by ACh and 52.9 % by ER tests on another coronary artery. No irreversible complications were recognized on both tests. We should firstly perform spasm provocation tests in the LCA and we may be able to diagnose another vessel spasm by performing the complete spasm provocation tests after the administration of nitrates to relieve provoked spasm in the first attempt.

Maximal acetylcholine dose of 200 μg into the left coronary artery as a spasm provocation test: comparison with 100 μg of acetylcholine

As a spasm provocation test of acetylcholine (ACH), incremental dose up (20/50/100 μg) into the left coronary artery (LCA) is recommended in the guidelines established by Japanese Circulation Society. Recently, Ong et al. reported the ACOVA study which maximal ACH dose was 200 μg in the LCA. We compared the angiographic findings between ACH 100 μg and ACH 200 μg in the LCA and also examined the usefulness and safety of ACH 200 μg in Japanese patients without variant angina. As a spasm provocation test, we performed intracoronary injection of ACH 200 μg after ACH 100 μg in 88 patients (55 males, 68.4 ± 11.7 years old) including 59 ischemic heart disease (IHD) patients and 29 non-IHD patients. Positive spasm was defined as >99 % transient stenosis (focal spasm) or 90 % severe diffuse vasoconstriction (diffuse spasm). Positive spasm by ACH 200 μg was significantly higher than that by ACH 100 μg (36 pts: 40.9 % vs. 17 pts: 19.3 %, p < 0.01). Diffuse distal spasm on the left anterior descending artery was more recognized in ACH 200 μg than in ACH 100 μg (30.7 vs. 13.6 %, p < 0.01). In 29 rest angina patients, positive spasm by ACH 200 μg (19 pts) was significantly higher than that by ACH 100 μg (7 pts) (65.5 vs. 24.1 %, p < 0.01). No serious irreversible complications were found during ACH 200 μg. Administration of ACH 200 μg into the LCA was safe and useful. We may reexamine the maximal ACH dose into the LCA.

Spasm provocation tests performed under medical therapy: a new approach for treating patients with refractory coronary spastic angina on emergency admission

Objective There are no objective methods for evaluating the severity of vasospasms in patients with refractory coronary spastic angina (R-CSA) under adequate medical therapy. We examined whether spasm provocation tests performed under adequate medication are useful for evaluating the severity of disease in R-CSA patients on emergency admission. Methods and Results We performed spasm provocation tests before and after the administration of medical therapy in eight R-CSA patients, including one ventricular fibrillation survivor (VF-S) and seven patients with unstable angina (UAP) on emergency readmission. We also performed these tests only after medical therapy on urgent admission in four R-CSA patients, including two patients with UAP, one patient with VF-S and one patient with acute coronary syndrome. All 12 R-CSA patients had been medicated with ≥ 2 vasodilator drugs. Positive coronary spasms were defined as >99% transient narrowing. The coronary artery spasms disappeared in three patients under medication, and mitigation of vasospasticity was observed in three patients. In these six cases we continued the same medications. Meanwhile in two patients, we recommended a consultation for psychosomatic medicine. In contrast, the remaining six R-CSA patients exhibited higher levels of vasospasticity, irrespective of the administration of aggressive medical therapy, in which the doses of vasoactive drugs were increased in order to suppress coronary artery spasms. Conclusion In some R-CSA patients on emergency admission, performing spasm provocation tests under medical therapy is useful for determining the subsequent treatment strategy. Therefore, this test may become a new tool in the treatment of R-CSA.

Drug-induced atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia and an important cause of hospitalization, morbidity, and mortality. A myriad of drugs can induce AF. However, drug-induced AF (DIAF) receives little attention. Thus, this review is an attempt to attract the attention on this adverse effect.

AREAS COVERED

Published reports of drug-induced AF (DIAF) are reviewed in this paper, from January 1974 to December 2011, using the PubMed/Medline database and lateral references.

EXPERT OPINION

In most cases, DIAF is paroxysmal and terminates spontaneously, but sometimes AF persists and it is necessary to perform a cardioversion to restore sinus rhythm and avoid progression to persistent AF. Because of the short duration of DIAF, in addition to physicians/patients not being knowledgeable about this side effect, the real incidence and clinical consequences of DIAF are presently unknown. DIAF is an increasing problem, as some widely prescribed drugs can present this adverse effect. The risk is expected to increase in the elderly and in patients with comorbidities. It is important that physicians understand the significance of DIAF, to increase the collaboration between cardiac and non-cardiac professionals, and to educate patients to make them aware of this adverse side effect.

Coronary abnormal response has increased in Japanese patients: analysis of 17 years' spasm provocation tests in 2093 cases

BACKGROUND

Abnormal coronary response on acetylcholine test is observed in patients with early coronary atherosclerosis.

OBJECTIVES

We analyzed retrospectively the abnormal response rate during 17 years of spasm provocation tests in 2093 consecutive patients.

METHODS

We performed 2093 spasm provocation tests, consisting of 1198 acetylcholine tests and 895 ergonovine tests, between January 1991 and December 2007. Spasm provocation test was mainly performed in patients with ischemic heart disease. Abnormal response was defined as transient >90% luminal narrowing during spasm provocation tests. We classified these 17 years into two periods: former period from January 1991 to December 2000, and the latter period from January 2001 to December 2007. In the former period, 1300 spasm provocation tests were performed and 793 spasm provocation tests were done in the latter period.

RESULTS

The incidences of hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes mellitus were significantly increased in the latter period. The values of total cholesterol, triglycerides, and fasting blood sugar were also significantly increased in the latter period. The frequency of abnormal response in the latter period was significantly higher than that in the former period (46.0% vs. 33.2%, p<0.05). The frequency of abnormal coronary response to acetylcholine in the latter period was significantly higher than that in the former period (60.0% vs. 34.0%, p<0.01), whereas there was no difference concerning abnormal response of ergonovine between the two periods (31.9% vs. 30.7%, ns).

CONCLUSIONS

In Japanese patients, abnormal coronary response to acetylcholine has increased and coronary endothelial dysfunction is suggested to have progressed.

Recommendations for performing acetylcholine tests safely: STOP dangerous complications induced by acetylcholine tests (STOP DCIAT)

OBJECTIVES

We examined some recommendations for performing acetylcholine (ACh) tests safely.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed 1000 ACh tests from 1991 to December 2004. ACh was injected in incremental doses of 20/50/80 microg into the RCA and of 20/50/100 microg into the LCA. During these periods, we encountered various major/minor complications; 12 ventricular tachycardia (1.2%) necessary one dc, one ventricular fibrillation (0.1%) necessary dc, 3 shock like the left main stem spasm (0.3%), one cardiac tamponade necessary surgical drainage (0.1%), and 164 Paf (164/959:17.1%) necessary administration of antiarrhythmic agents to sinus rhythm in about one third patients (31.7%). We did not experience irreversible severe complications, such as acute myocardial infarction or death.

RECOMMENDATIONS

(1) Stand by direct current with pasting, (2) Thump version when ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation occurred, (3) Over infusion to avoid hypovolemia, (4) Perform angiography before complete spasm provocation if a severe spasm, (5) Drainage if cardiac tamponade occurred, (6) Cibenzoline or disopyramid administration when ACh induced paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, (7) Incremental ACh dose up should be performed, (8) Administer small amount of noradrenaline if shock observed and (9) Test shot should be performed before 1-min angiography.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend STOP DCIAT for performing ACh tests safely.

A long-acting calcium antagonist over one year did not improve BMIPP myocardial scintigraphic imagings in patients with pure coronary spastic angina

BACKGROUND

Calcium antagonists (Ca) have been effective in reducing angina attacks in patients with variant angina. However, there are no reports regarding the effectiveness of Ca on myocardial fatty acid metabolic images in patients with pure coronary spastic angina (CSA).

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to examine the correlation between myocardial fatty acid metabolic images and the medical treatment of Ca in patients with pure CSA.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This study included 35 consecutive patients (28 men, mean age of 66 +/- 10 years) with angiographically confirmed coronary spasm and no fixed stenosis. Long-acting Ca was administered to all 35 patients. Isosorbide dinitrate /nicorandil/another Ca/beta-bloker were administered when chest pain was not controlled. Using an iodinated fatty acid analogue, 15-(p-[iodine-123]iodophenyl)-3-(R,S)methylpentadecanoic acid (BMIPP), myocardial scintigraphies with intravenous adenosine triphosphate infusion were performed before cardiac catheterization and 12 mo after medical therapy. According to the medical control states, these 35 patients were classified into 3 groups; response (disappearance of angina attacks, 12 pts, 60 +/- 11 years), partial response (angina attacks < 4/mo, 12 pts, 67 +/- 10 years), and no response to therapy (angina attacks > or = 4/mo, 11 pts, 71 +/- 6 years). Reduced BMIPP uptake was observed in 24 (69%) of 35 patients before the treatment. Reduced BMIPP uptake was also found in 18 patients (51%) after 12 mo. Normal BMIPP uptake after 12 mo therapy was observed in about half (response: 42%, partial response: 58%, no response: 45%) of patients among the 3 groups. There was no difference regarding the value of washout rate (WOR) (response; 10 +/- 7 (before), 14 +/- 8% (12 mo)), partial response; 11 +/- 7, 10 +/- 5%, no response; 13 +/- 9, 14 +/- 8%) among the 3 groups. The defect scores of BMIPP in the three groups were not different during at least one year medical therapy. No difference regarding the distribution of other medical therapies (angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers/beta-blockers/statins) was found. The administration of Ca and isosorbide dinitrate/nicorandil and 2 Ca was significantly higher in the poor than in the good control patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-acting Ca over one year did not improve myocardial fatty acid metabolic images in patients with pure CSA. This may be related to silent ischemia.

Clinical impact of selective spasm provocation tests: comparisons between acetylcholine and ergonovine in 1508 examinations

BACKGROUND

There are few reports regarding the concordance of coronary arterial response between acetylcholine (ACh) and ergonovine (ER) spasm provocation tests.

OBJECTIVES

We attempted to perform selective spasm provocation tests to examine the incidence of provoked spasm in patients who had undergone first coronary angiography as much as possible and we compared the coronary arterial response and clinical usefulness between selective intracoronary injection of ACh and intracoronary administration of ER.

METHODS

We performed 1508 selective spasm provocation tests, consisting of 873 ACh tests and 635 ER tests, from 1991 to 2002. We examined the frequency of provoked spasms of each agent retrospectively. ACh was injected in incremental doses of 20, 50 and 80 microg into the right coronary artery and 20, 50 and 100 microg into the left coronary artery. ER was administered as 10 microg/min over 4 min for a maximal dose of 40 microg in the right coronary artery and as 16 microg/min over 4 min for a total dose of 64 microg in the left coronary artery. Coronary spasm was defined as transient >99% luminal narrowing.

RESULTS

Intracoronary ACh provoked spasms in 36.0% of patients and intracoronary ER induced spasms in 29.8% of patients. In patients with ischemic heart disease, the incidence of provoked spasms was not different between ACh tests (50.9%) and ER tests (43.8%). In contrast, the frequency of provoked spasms with ACh tests was significantly higher than that with ER tests (11.0% compared with 6.4%, P<0.05) in patients without ischemic heart disease. Moreover, ACh provoked more spasms in patients without fixed stenosis than ER (36.2% compared with 25.5%, P<0.01) and multiple spasms were frequently observed when performing ACh tests (40.0% compared with 27.0%, P<0.01). Major complications were observed in 1.4% of patients with ACh tests and in 0.2% of patients with ER tests. The need for intracoronary administration of isosorbide dinitrate to relieve coronary spasms during ER testing before performing another coronary artery test was more frequently observed in ACh tests (5.04% compared with 1.49%, P<0.01). However, no serious irreversible complications, such as death or acute myocardial infarction, were observed in this study. There was a significant difference in sex, history of smoking and hyperlipidemia between patients with and without spasms for both tests, whereas no difference in age or hypertension was observed in either test.

CONCLUSION

Thus, both selective ACh and ER tests were useful as spasm provocation tests.

Drug-induced atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained rhythm disorder observed in clinical practice and predominantly associated with cardiovascular disorders such as coronary heart disease and hypertension. However, several classes of drugs may induce AF in patients without apparent heart disease or may precipitate the onset of AF in patients with preexisting heart disease. We reviewed the literature on drug-induced AF, using the PubMed/Medline and Micromedex databases and lateral references. Successively, we discuss the potential role in the onset of AF of cardiovascular drugs, respiratory system drugs, cytostatics, central nervous system drugs, genitourinary system drugs, and some miscellaneous agents. Drug-induced AF may play a role in only a minority of the patients presenting with AF. Nevertheless, it is important to recognize drugs or other agents as a potential cause, especially in the elderly, because increasing age is associated with multiple drug use and a high incidence of AF. This may contribute to timely diagnosis and management of drug-induced AF.

Frequency of provoked coronary spasms in patients undergoing coronary arteriography using a spasm provocation test via intracoronary administration of ergonovine

There are no data concerning the incidence of provoked coronary arterial spasms via intracoronary administration of ergonovine (ER). This study sought to establish the incidence of spasms due to intracoronary injection of ER in Japanese patients who underwent coronary angiography. The subjects were 596 consecutive patients (369 men, mean age 64.2 +/- 10.3 years) who were studied with a selective ER test. ER was administered in total doses of 40 microg into the right coronary artery and 64 microg into the left coronary artery. A positive spasm was defined as a total or subtotal occlusion. Coronary vasospasms were determined in 173 patients (29.0%). Spasms occurred often in patients with ischemic heart disease (43.3%); during effort and rest in patients with angina (46.3%), exertional angina (27.7%), recent myocardial infarction (36.7%), healed myocardial infarction (34.1%), and especially in patients with rest angina (55.5%), but were relatively uncommon in patients with nonischemic heart disease (3.7%). The incidence of provoked coronary spasms in this study was 2.2-2.6 times higher than in previous reports with intravenous ER administration. More spasms were superimposed on significant atherosclerotic lesions than on nonfixed atherosclerotic lesions (42.8% vs 24.0%, p < 0.01). No serious or irreversible complications were observed in this study. In conclusion, intracoronary administration of ER was a safe and reliable test. Compared with Caucasian patients, in Japanese patients, coronary arterial spasms occurred 2-3 times more frequently with various cardiac disorders.

Did the Widespread Use of Long-Acting Calcium Antagonists Decrease the Occurrence of Variant Angina?

BACKGROUND

We have not often encountered variant angina (VA) since the use of long-acting calcium antagonists (L-CAs) became widespread.

OBJECTIVES

This study examined the frequency of VA retrospectively.

METHODS

and results: We diagnosed angiographically confirmed coronary spastic angina (CSA) in 349 consecutive patients using selective spasm provocation tests from January 1991 to December 2002. During this period, 3,148 diagnostic cardiac catheterizations and 1,515 selective spasm provocation tests were performed. Seventy-four of these 349 patients (21.2%) had VA. Coronary spasms were defined as transient luminal narrowings of > 99%, and VA was defined as an ST elevation during spontaneous attacks or noninvasive stress tests. We classified the 12 years of the study into four periods of 3 years each. No tendency to decrease for the ratio of the number of patients with CSA and the number of selective spasm provocation tests was observed among the four time periods (18%, 24%, 32%, and 23%, respectively). However, the number of patients with VA (28, 33, 9, and 4) and the VA/CSA ratio (32%, 28%, 14%, and 5%, respectively) in the four group significantly decreased. The frequency of administration of calcium antagonists (CAs) before hospital admission (49% vs 33%, respectively; p < 0.05) was significantly higher in the last time period (from 2000 to 2002) than in the first period (from 1991 to 1993). L-CAs were administered in > 90% of CSA patients who had been medicated with CAs before hospital admission in the last period (from 2000 to 2002), while L-CAs were administered in only 20% in the former period (from 1991 to 1993). The administration of statins and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers before hospital admission gradually increased according to the period passed, but not significantly.

CONCLUSION

The frequency of VA has decreased in Japan, possibly due to the widespread use of therapy with L-CAs.

Coronary flow reserve in patients with vasospastic angina: correlation between coronary flow reserve and age or duration of angina

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to assess the coronary flow reserve (CFR) in patients with pure vasospastic angina (VSA).

METHODS AND RESULTS

The phasic flow velocities of both spasm-positive and spasm-negative coronary arteries of the left anterior descending artery (LAD) were recorded at rest and during hyperaemia (50 microg of adenosine triphosphate infusion intracoronary) using a 0.014 inch, 15 MHz Doppler guide wire in 42 patients with pure VSA and acetylcholine (ACh)-induced coronary artery spasms (20-100 microg), and 23 controls with normal coronary arteries without ACh-induced vasospasm. These 42 patients had 16 vessels with focal spasms (>99%), 17 vessels with diffuse spasms (>90%) in the LAD, and nine vessels with ACh-induced spasms in the right coronary artery, but not the LAD. Coronary flow reserve was obtained from the ratio of the hyperaemic/baseline time-averaged peak velocity. Coronary flow reserve did not differ between patients with VSA and the controls (2.9+/-0.8 versus 3.2+/-0.7, NS). Moreover, CFR did not differ among the four cases (focal: 2.8+/-0.7; diffuse: 3.0+/-0.9; non spasm: 2.9+/-0.7 versus controls: 3.2+/-0.7, respectively, NS). Coronary flow reserve in vessels with proximal spasms was significantly higher than that in vessels with mid or distal spasms (3.4+/-0.8 versus 2.6+/-0.6, 2.6+/-0.9, p<0.05). The only significant correlation was between CFR and age (p=0.0275) or the duration of angina before admission (p=0.0405).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no difference in CFR in patients with ACh-induced spasms between the spasm-positive and spasm-negative vessels. Moreover, CFR was maintained normally in vessels with diffuse spasms, as in those with focal spasms. The most important determinant factors for CFR in patients with VSA were age and the duration of angina before admission.

Induction of coronary artery spasm by two pharmacological agents: comparison between intracoronary injection of acetylcholine and ergonovine

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

There have been few studies comparing the clinical usefulness for the induction of coronary artery spasm (CAS) between acetylcholine (ACh) and ergonovine (ER). This study is designed: (1) to examine the duration of effect after intracoronary injection of ACh on the responsible vessels using a 0.014 inch, 15 MHz Doppler guide wire, and (2) to evaluate the efficacy of two pharmacological agents, ACh and ER, for the induction of CAS in patients with <50% stenosis in the cardiac laboratory.

METHODS

Phasic coronary flow velocity patterns were recorded at rest and during ACh tests in 22 patients with normal or near-normal coronary arteries. The tip of the guide wire was placed on the proximal right coronary artery (RCA) and mid-left anterior descending artery. We measured the time required to baseline level of average peak velocity after intracoronary injection of ACh. We performed selective intracoronary administration of both ER and ACh in the same 171 patients (106 men, 65 women, mean age of 62+/-10 years) with <50% stenosis. Under no medication, ACh was injected first in incremental doses of 20, 50, and 80 microg into the RCA and of 20, 50, and 100 microg into the left coronary artery (LCA). Ten minutes later, ER was administered at 10 microg/min for four minutes for a maximal dose of 40 microg on the RCA and at 16 microg/min over four minutes for a total dose of 64 microg on the LCA. Positive spasm was defined as > or =99% luminal narrowing.

RESULTS

The time-averaged peak velocity returned to baseline after intracoronary injection of ACh within 10 minutes in all 120 procedures, consisted of 19 with positive spasm (RCA (n=10): 245+/-33 s; LCA (n=9): 351+/-187 s) and 101 with negative spasm (RCA (n=48): 155+/-62 s, LCA (n=53): 248+/-106 s). In the overall results, there was no difference concerning the incidence of provoked spasm between the two pharmacological agents (ACh: 33% versus ER: 32%, NS). Coronary spasms were induced by either pharmacological agent in 134 vessels. Concordance in this study was 94% in all vessels, whereas the remaining 6% of vessels were different from each other. The non-concordance rate of the right coronary artery was significantly higher than that of the left coronary artery (10% versus 4%, p<0.01). However, ER provoked more focal spasms, whereas ACh provoked more diffuse and distal spasms, compared with each other. Seventy-four (55%) of the 134 vessels had coronary spasms in the same coronary arteries. Concordance of both provoked spasm sites and spasm configurations in the same coronary artery was observed in only 18 (13%) vessels. No serious or irreversible complications were observed during the two sequential tests.

CONCLUSIONS

As a spasm provocation test, there were no differences between ACh and ER. We recommend the supplementary use of these two pharmacological agents for the induction of CAS in the cardiac laboratory, if available.

Limitations of medical therapy in patients with pure coronary spastic angina

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy of medication for the treatment of pure coronary spastic angina, 71 consecutive patients with this diagnosis who had undergone coronary arteriography in a hospital with a follow-up of at least 2 years were studied.

METHODS AND RESULTS

All 71 patients without significant organic stenosis were treated with long-acting calcium antagonists. The disappearance of chest pain attacks while receiving medical therapy was observed in 27 patients (38%), whereas the remaining 44 patients (62%) had chest pain attacks. Of special interest, 30 patients had more than one attack per month irrespective of the administration of calcium antagonists or isosorbide dinitrate. Medical treatment showed a good response in female patients (63% vs 31%, respectively; p < 0.05) and those with ST-segment elevation during selective spasm provocation tests (63% vs 30%, respectively; p < 0.05). In contrast, patients with a longer history of chest pain attacks before hospital admission and those with diffuse spasms (77% vs 34%, respectively; p < 0.01) had poor responses to medical treatment. In this study, neither sudden death nor acute myocardial infarction was observed during the follow-up periods.

CONCLUSION

The limitations of medical therapy, including the administration of long-acting calcium antagonists, were observed in 30 of 71 patients (42%) with pure coronary spastic angina. Medical treatment was effective in only 38% of patients with pure coronary spastic angina in Japan.

Intracoronary administration of a thromboxane A2 synthase inhibitor relieves acetylcholine-induced coronary spasm

This study sought to clarify the effectiveness of intracoronary administration of a thromboxane (TX) A2 synthase inhibitor, Ozagrel Na, to relieve coronary spasms induced by intracoronary injection of acetylcholine (ACh). An ACh spasm provocation test was performed in 92 consecutive patients with coronary spastic angina using incremental doses of 20, 50, and 80 microg into the right coronary artery, and 20, 50, and 100 microg into the left coronary artery within 20s. A coronary spasm was defined as TIMI 0 or 1 flow and an intracoronary injection of 20 mg Ozagrel Na was administered when it was provoked. Within 2 min of the administration of the TXA2 synthase inhibitor, ACh-induced coronary spasms were relieved (TIMI 3 flow) in 88.1% of procedures without complications. In only 4 cases (4.3%), it took more than 3 min to relieve the coronary spasms. Intracoronary administration of 20mg Ozagrel Na when ACh-induced spasms occurred, shortened the spasm relief time in all 7 patients (200 +/- 59s vs 111 +/- 23s, p < 0.01), improved the maximal ST segment elevation in 5 of them (3.9 +/- 3.7 mm vs 0.7 +/- 1.5 mm, p < 0.05), and stopped chest pain in 4 patients. In 4 patients who had ACh-induced coronary spasm of the left anterior descending artery, the TXB2 concentration in the coronary sinus decreased after intracoronary administration of Ozagrel Na into the left coronary artery (463 +/- 562 vs 96 +/- 45, p < 0.01). In conclusion, intracoronary administration of a TXA2 synthase inhibitor can relieve ACh-induced coronary spasms by inhibiting TXA2 synthesis in the local coronary circulation.

Clinical and angiographical characteristics of acetylcholine- induced spasm: relationship to dose of intracoronary injection of acetylcholine

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to clarify clinical and angiographical characteristics of acetylcholine (ACh)-induced spasm in the right and left coronary artery.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed 557 consecutive procedures of spasm provocation tests of ACh from January 1991 to December 2000 in patients without significant stenosis. ACh was injected in incremental doses of 20, 50 and 80 microg into the right coronary artery and in incremental doses of 20, 50 and 100 microg into the left coronary artery if spasm had not been provoked. Coronary spasm was defined as positive with more than 99% transient luminal narrowing. Proximal spasm was defined as that of segments 1, 2, 5, 6, 7 and 11 and distal spasm as that of segments 3, 4, 8, 9, 12, 13 and 14. Low-ACh-dose-induced spasms showed the clinical findings and angiographical characteristics of higher incidence of variant angina, proximal spasms, focal spasms, more ST elevation and ischemic heart disease. In contrast, angiographical characteristics of high-Ach-dose-induced spasms were distal spasms and diffuse spasms and there was less variant angina and less ST elevation.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower ACh doses induced spasms more proximally and focally in the coronary artery, while higher doses of ACh provoked spasms more distally and diffusely.