Differing effects of oral and transdermal hormone replacement therapy on cardiovascular risk factors in healthy postmenopausal women

Sex differences in lipid and lipoprotein metabolism

BACKGROUND

Endogenous sex hormones are important for metabolic health in men and women. Before menopause, women are protected from atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) relative to men. Women have fewer cardiovascular complications of obesity compared to men with obesity. Endogenous estrogens have been proposed as a mechanism that lessens ASCVD risk, as risk of glucose and lipid abnormalities increases when endogenous estrogens decline with menopause. While baseline risk is higher in males than females, endogenously produced androgens are also protective against fatty liver, diabetes and ASCVD, as risk goes up with androgen deprivation and with the decline in androgens with age.

SCOPE OF REVIEW

In this review, we discuss evidence of how endogenous sex hormones and hormone treatment approaches impact fatty acid, triglyceride, and cholesterol metabolism to influence metabolic and cardiovascular risk. We also discuss potential reasons for why treatment strategies with estrogens and androgens in older individuals fail to fully recapitulate the effects of endogenous sex hormones.

MAJOR CONCLUSIONS

The pathways that confer ASCVD protection for women are of potential therapeutic relevance. Despite protection relative to men, ASCVD is still the major cause of mortality in women. Additionally, diabetic women have similar ASCVD risk as diabetic men, suggesting that the presence of diabetes may offset the protective cardiovascular effects of being female through unknown mechanisms.

Associations of Steroid Sex Hormones and Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin With the Risk of Type 2 Diabetes in Women: A Population-Based Cohort Study and Meta-analysis

It remains unclear whether endogenous sex hormones (ESH) are associated with risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D) in women. Data of 3,117 postmenopausal women participants of the Rotterdam Study were analyzed to examine whether ESH and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) were associated with the risk of incident T2D. Additionally, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies assessing the prospective association of ESH and SHBG with T2D in women. During a median follow-up of 11.1 years, we identified 384 incident cases of T2D in the Rotterdam Study. No association was observed between total testosterone (TT) or bioavailable testosterone (BT) with T2D. SHBG was inversely associated with the risk of T2D, whereas total estradiol (TE) was associated with increased risk of T2D. Similarly, in the meta-analysis of 13 population-based prospective studies involving more than 1,912 incident T2D cases, low levels of SHBG and high levels of TE were associated with increased risk of T2D, whereas no associations were found for other hormones. The association of SHBG with T2D did not change by menopause status, whereas the associations of ESH and T2D were based only in postmenopausal women. SHBG and TE are independent risk factors for the development of T2D in women.

Role of Estrogens in the Regulation of Liver Lipid Metabolism

Before menopause, women are protected from atherosclerotic heart disease associated with obesity relative to men. Sex hormones have been proposed as a mechanism that differentiates this risk. In this review, we discuss the literature around how the endogenous sex hormones and hormone treatment approaches after menopause regulate fatty acid, triglyceride, and cholesterol metabolism to influence cardiovascular risk.The important regulatory functions of estrogen signaling pathways with regard to lipid metabolism have been in part obscured by clinical trials with hormone treatment of women after menopause, due to different formulations, routes of delivery, and pairings with progestins. Oral hormone treatment with several estrogen preparations increases VLDL triglyceride production. Progestins oppose this effect by stimulating VLDL clearance in both humans and animals. Transdermal estradiol preparations do not increase VLDL production or serum triglycerides.Many aspects of sex differences in atherosclerotic heart disease risk are influenced by the distributed actions of estrogens in the muscle, adipose, and liver. In humans, 17β-estradiol (E2) is the predominant circulating estrogen and signals through estrogen receptor alpha (ERα), estrogen receptor beta (ERβ), and G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER). Over 1000 human liver genes display a sex bias in their expression, and the top biological pathways are in lipid metabolism and genes related to cardiovascular disease. Many of these genes display variation depending on estrus cycling in the mouse. Future directions will likely rely on targeting estrogens to specific tissues or specific aspects of the signaling pathways in order to recapitulate the protective physiology of premenopause therapeutically after menopause.

Age at menarche, the leg length to sitting height ratio, and risk of diabetes in middle-aged and elderly Chinese men and women

AIMS

To evaluate the associations of age at menarche and the leg length-to-sitting-height ratio, markers of adolescent growth, with risk of diabetes in later life.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Information from 69,385 women and 55,311 men, aged 40-74 years from the Shanghai Women's Health Study and Shanghai Men's Health Study, were included in the current analyses. Diabetes status was ascertained through biennial in person follow-up. Cox models, with age as the time scale, were used.

RESULTS

There were 2369 cases of diabetes (1831 women; 538 men) during an average of 7.3 and 3.6 years of follow-up of the women and men, respectively. In females, menarche age was inversely associated with diabetes risk after adjustment for birth cohort, education, and income (HR = 0.95, 0.92-0.98). In both genders, leg length-to-sitting-height ratio was inversely related to diabetes (HR = 0.88, 0.80-0.97 for men; HR = 0.91, 0.86-0.96 for women) after adjustment for birth cohort, education, and income. Further adjustment for adult BMI at study enrollment completely eliminated the associations of age at menarche (HR = 0.99, 0.96-1.02) and the leg length-to-sitting-height ratio (HR = 1.00, 0.91-1.10 for men; HR = 1.01, 0.96-1.07 for women) with diabetes risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that markers of an early age at peak height velocity, i.e. early menarche age and low leg-length-to-sitting height ratio, may be associated with diabetes risk later in life and this association is likely to be mediated through obesity.

Are all estrogens created equal? A review of oral vs. transdermal therapy

BACKGROUND

To compare oral and transdermal delivery systems in domains of lipid effects; cardiovascular, inflammatory, and thrombotic effects; effect on insulin-like growth factor, insulin resistance, and metabolic syndrome; sexual effects; metabolic effects including weight; and effects on target organs bone, breast, and uterus.

METHODS

Review of the literature 1990-2010. Studies selected on basis of applicability, quality of data, and relationship to topic.

RESULTS

Data applicable to the comparisons of oral versus transdermal delivery systems for postmenopausal estrogen therapy were utilized to perform a review and formulate conclusions.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant differences appear to exist between oral and transdermal estrogens in terms of hormonal bioavailability and metabolism, with implications for clinical efficacy, potential side effects, and risk profile of different hormone therapy options, but neither results nor study designs are uniform. Bypassing hepatic metabolism appears to result in more stable serum estradiol levels without supraphysiologic concentrations in the liver. By avoiding first-pass metabolism, transdermal hormone therapy may have less pronounced effects on hepatic protein synthesis, such as inflammatory markers, markers of coagulation and fibrinolysis, and steroid binding proteins, while oral hormone therapy has more pronounced hyper-coagulant effects and increases synthesis of C-reactive protein and fibrinolytic markers. Both oral and transdermal delivery systems have beneficial effects on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratios (oral>transdermal), while the transdermal system has more favorable effects on triglycerides. Incidence of metabolic syndrome and weight gain appears to be slightly lower with a transdermal delivery system. Oral estrogen's significant increase in hepatic sex hormone binding globulin production lowers testosterone availability compared with transdermal delivery, with clinically relevant effects on sexual vigor.

Health correlates and mode of administration of hormones--are there any differences between parenteral and oral estrogen preparations?

OBJECTIVES

To investigate use-associated differences between parental and oral hormone therapy (HT) users in reference to HT non-users regarding self-rated general health status, quality of life, health service utilization, and selected chronic diseases.

METHODS

All cases of last-week medicine use were recorded among 2248 women aged 40-79 who participated in the German Health Interview and Examination Survey 1997-1999. 89 current parenteral HT users and 322 oral HT users were identified. Health correlates were compared between the two groups in reference to HT non-users.

RESULTS

Oral HT users had a poorer current health status as well as an impaired health status compared to the year before, were less satisfied with their health and life in general, and showed a lower quality of life regarding 'body pain' and 'vitality' in comparison with hormone non-users (all p<.05). Parenteral HT users showed no significant difference compared with HT non-users and oral HT users, respectively, in these health correlates except for a less satisfaction with health found in comparison with HT non-users (p=.002). Prevalences of cerebral-cardiovascular diseases were not different among women using parenteral or oral HT use. Parenteral HT users visited the offices of general practitioner and gynecologists more frequently than oral HT users as well as hormone non-users (all p<.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Oral HT use is associated with a negative assessment for health well-being whereas parenteral HT use shows largely a neutral effect. Further designated studies could clarify whether the mode of hormone administration consistently affects health-related quality of life and whether the mode of hormone treatment influences the choice of outpatient facilities for surveillance of therapy.

High C‐reactive protein levels are associated with oral hormonal menopausal therapy but not with intrauterine levonorgestrel and transdermal estradiol

OBJECTIVE

Oral hormone replacement therapy (HRT) has been linked to increased cardiovascular (CVD) morbidity. HRT causes a sustained increase in C-reactive protein (CRP), an excellent marker of subclinical inflammation and CVD. The aim of the study was to support our hypothesis that CRP, which is synthesized in the liver, is not increased in association with transdermal/intrauterine HRT.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A case-control study was performed in which CRP measurements in women receiving levonorgestrel intrauterine system combined with transdermal estradiol (LNG/TDE, n=27) were followed for 9 months or longer. CRP concentrations in these women were compared with those of either oral HRT users (n=20) or controls (n=19).

RESULTS

No significant differences were found in CRP concentrations between the LGN/TDE and control groups (1.8+/-1.2 and 1.8+/-1.8 mg/L, respectively). However, CRP was significantly increased in the oral HRT group (5.5+/-2.9 mg/L, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

CRP is significantly increased by oral HRT but not by the LNG/TDE combination after 9 months of treatment. This trend may explain the preponderance of some menopausal women on HRT being at increased risk for the development of CVD. Therefore, the use of LNG/TDE is acceptable for relief of severe climacteric symptoms possibly not imposing an increased CVD risk documented upon oral HRT.

Transdermal hormone therapy in postmenopausal women: a review of metabolic effects and drug delivery technologies

Vasomotor symptoms (VMS) associated with menopause can cause significant discomfort and decrease the quality of life for women in the peri-menopausal and post-menopausal stages of life. Hormone therapy (HT) is the mainstay of treatment for menopausal symptoms and is currently the only therapy proven effective for VMS. Numerous HT options are available to treat VMS, including estrogen-only and estrogen-progestogen combination products to meet the needs of both hysterectomized and nonhysterectomized women. In addition to selecting an appropriate estrogen or estrogen-progestogen combination, consideration should be given to the route of administration to best suit the needs of the patient. Delivery systems for hormone therapy include oral tablets, transdermal patches, transdermal topical (nonpatch) products, and intravaginal preparations. Oral is currently the most commonly utilized route of administration in the United States. However, evidence suggests that oral delivery may lead to some undesirable physiologic effects caused by significant gut and hepatic metabolism. Transdermal drug delivery may mitigate some of these effects by avoiding gut and hepatic first-pass metabolism. Advantages of transdermal delivery include the ability to administer unmetabolized estradiol directly to the blood stream, administration of lower doses compared to oral products, and minimal stimulation of hepatic protein production. Several estradiol transdermal delivery technologies are available, including various types of patches, topical gels, and a transdermal spray.

Vascular actions of estrogens: functional implications

The impact of estrogen exposure in preventing or treating cardiovascular disease is controversial. But it is clear that estrogen has important effects on vascular physiology and pathophysiology, with potential therapeutic implications. Therefore, the goal of this review is to summarize, using an integrated approach, current knowledge of the vascular effects of estrogen, both in humans and in experimental animals. Aspects of estrogen synthesis and receptors, as well as general mechanisms of estrogenic action are reviewed with an emphasis on issues particularly relevant to the vascular system. Recent understanding of the impact of estrogen on mitochondrial function suggests that the longer lifespan of women compared with men may depend in part on the ability of estrogen to decrease production of reactive oxygen species in mitochondria. Mechanisms by which estrogen increases endothelial vasodilator function, promotes angiogenesis, and modulates autonomic function are summarized. Key aspects of the relevant pathophysiology of inflammation, atherosclerosis, stroke, migraine, and thrombosis are reviewed concerning current knowledge of estrogenic effects. A number of emerging concepts are addressed throughout. These include the importance of estrogenic formulation and route of administration and the impact of genetic polymorphisms, either in estrogen receptors or in enzymes responsible for estrogen metabolism, on responsiveness to hormone treatment. The importance of local metabolism of estrogenic precursors and the impact of timing for initiation of treatment and its duration are also considered. Although consensus opinions are emphasized, controversial views are presented to stimulate future research.

Effects of non-oral postmenopausal hormone therapy on markers of cardiovascular risk: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To review the effects of non-oral administration of postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) on risk markers for atherosclerotic and venous thromboembolic disease.Non-oral postmenopausal HT appears not to increase venous thromboembolic risk, whereas the effect on coronary heart disease risk is less clear.

DESIGN

Systematic review of literature obtained from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases from 1980 until and including April 2006. Terms for "postmenopausal hormone therapy" and for "non-oral administration" were combined in the search.

SETTING

Randomized clinical trials.

PATIENT(S)

Postmenopausal women, both healthy and with established cardiovascular disease or specified cardiovascular risk factors

INTERVENTION(S)

Non-oral HT (e.g., transdermal or intranasal) compared with oral HT or no treatment/placebo.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Lipoprotein(a), homocysteine, C-reactive protein (CRP), cell adhesion molecules, markers of endothelial dysfunction, coagulation, and fibrinolysis.

RESULT(S)

Seventy-two studies investigating either transdermal or intranasal administration were included. For non-oral HT, decreases in lipoprotein(a), cell adhesion molecules, and factor VII generally were significant, resistance to activated protein C (APCr) was slightly increased, and other markers including CRP and homocysteine did not change. Compared with oral HT, changes in CRP and APCr were smaller, changes in cell adhesion molecules and some fibrinolytic parameters tended to be smaller, whereas changes in other factors including lipoprotein(a) and homocysteine did not differ.

CONCLUSION(S)

Potentially unfavorable changes seen with oral HT on two important markers, CRP and APCr, are substantially smaller with non-oral HT. Non-oral HT has minor effects on the other cardiovascular risk markers studied. Therefore, compared with oral HT, non-oral HT appears be safer with respect to atherosclerotic and venous thromboembolic disease risk.

Plasma sex steroid hormones and risk of developing type 2 diabetes in women: a prospective study

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

Prospective data directly investigating the role of endogenous sex hormones in diabetes risk have been scant, particularly in women. We aimed to examine comprehensively plasma sex hormones in connection with risk of developing type 2 diabetes in postmenopausal women.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, nested case-control study of plasma oestradiol, testosterone and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate and risk of type 2 diabetes in a cohort of women health professionals with a mean age of 60.3 and 12.2 years since menopause. Among women not using hormone therapy and free of baseline cardiovascular disease, cancer and diabetes, 359 incident cases of type 2 diabetes were matched with 359 controls during an average follow-up of 10 years.

RESULTS

Oestradiol and testosterone were each strongly and positively associated with risk of type 2 diabetes. After adjustment for BMI, family history, lifestyle and reproductive variables, the multivariable relative risks (95% CI) comparing the highest vs lowest quintile were 12.6 (2.83-56.3) for total oestradiol (p = 0.002 for trend), 13.1 (4.18-40.8) for free oestradiol (p < 0.001 for trend), 4.15 (1.21-14.2) for total testosterone (p = 0.019 for trend) and 14.8 (4.44-49.2) for free testosterone (p < 0.001 for trend). These associations remained robust after adjusting and accounting for other metabolic syndrome components and baseline HbA(1c) levels.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

In postmenopausal women, higher plasma levels of oestradiol and testosterone were strongly and prospectively related to increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes. These prospective data indicate that endogenous levels of sex hormones may play important roles in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes. ClinicalTrials.gov ID no.: NCT00000479.

Persistence with oral and transdermal hormone replacement therapy and hospitalisation for cardiovascular outcomes

BACKGROUND

The effect of persistence with transdermal and oral administrations of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on the risk of hospitalisation for cardiovascular disease, and the role of income as potential confounder, were explored in a large population-based cohort study.

METHODS

Seventy-eight thousand eight hundred and seventy-five women resident in the Italian Lombardy Region aged 45-65 years who received at least one HRT prescription during 1998-2000 were followed until December 2003. The 828 cohort members who experienced at least one hospitalisation for a circulatory system disease were identified from the Regional hospital discharge database. The Regional prescription drug database was used to assess cumulative persistence with hormone treatment during follow-up. Data on individual taxable income was also obtained for women resident in the city of Milan. A proportional hazards model was fitted to estimate the association between cumulative time-dependent persistence with HRT and cardiovascular risk.

RESULTS

Compared with women who took HRT for less than 6 months, those exposed for more than 3 years to HRT as a whole, and to transdermal and oral HRT, respectively, showed hazard ratios of 0.65 (95% confidence interval: 0.45, 0.92), 0.53 (0.34, 0.82), and 1.15 (0.47, 2.79). CVD reducing potential of HRT disappeared when estimates were adjusted for income being hazard ratio associated with long-term use 0.94 (0.52, 1.71).

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence that CVD risk associated with long-term hormone treatment varies according to the route of HRT administration, and that economic position confounds the effect of HRT on the risk of cardiovascular hospitalisation, is provided by the current study.

Complex actions of sex steroids in adipose tissue, the cardiovascular system, and brain: Insights from basic science and clinical studies

Recent publications describing the results of the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) and other studies reporting the impact of hormone therapy on aging women have spurred reexamination of the broad use of estrogens and progestins during the postmenopausal years. Here, we review the complex pharmacology of these hormones, the diverse and sometimes opposite effects that result from the use of different estrogenic and progestinic compounds, given via different delivery routes in different concentrations and treatment sequence, and to women of different ages and health status. We examine our new and growing appreciation of the role of estrogens in the immune system and the inflammatory response, and we pose the concept that estrogen's interface with this system may be at the core of some of the effects on multiple physiological systems, such as the adipose/metabolic system, the cardiovascular system, and the central nervous system. We compare and contrast clinical and basic science studies as we focus on the actions of estrogens in these systems because the untoward effects of hormone therapy reported in the WHI were not expected. The broad interpretation and publicity of the results of the WHI have resulted in a general condemnation of all hormone replacement in postmenopausal women. In fact, careful review of the extensive literature suggests that data resulting from the WHI and other recent studies should be interpreted within the narrow context of the study design. We argue that these results should encourage us to perform new studies that take advantage of a dialogue between basic scientists and clinician scientists to ensure appropriate design, incorporation of current knowledge, and proper interpretation of results. Only then will we have a better understanding of what hormonal compounds should be used in which populations of women and at what stages of menopausal/postmenopausal life.

Effects of intranasal 17β-estradiol administration on serum bioactive interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein levels in healthy postmenopausal women

OBJECTIVE

Oral estrogen increases the levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), which is an independent risk factor for coronary heart disease in healthy individuals. The aim of our study was to investigate the effects of intranasal 17beta-estradiol (E2) on serum CRP and its most potent stimulant, interleukin-6 in healthy postmenopausal women.

DESIGN

Thirty-six healthy postmenopausal women (45-54 y) were enrolled. According to their individual preferences, they were assigned to intranasal (n = 10), transdermal (n = 14), or oral (n = 12) continuous E2 treatment with a sequential progestin (10-14 d in a 28-d cycle). Blood samples were drawn at baseline and after 3, 6, and 12 months during the estrogen-only phase to adjust for the progestin effect.

RESULTS

In women taking intranasal or transdermal E2, there were no significant changes in median serum CRP levels during the 12-month treatment period. In women taking oral E2 preparations, serum median CRP levels were significantly higher compared to baseline after 6 and 12 months of the therapy (P < 0.05). Conversely, serum median bioactive interleukin-6 levels were significantly lower after 6 and 12 months in women taking E2 intranasally or orally and after 12 months in women taking E2 transdermally (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our study show that intranasal, similarly to transdermal, E2 administration does not increase serum CRP levels in postmenopausal women. They also support the hypothesis that CRP increase during oral estrogen treatment is not mediated by the enhancement of interleukin-6 production by the immune cells but is rather caused by the hepatic first-pass metabolism effect.

Effects of Transdermal Estrogen Replacement Therapy on Cardiovascular Risk Factors

The prevalence of hypertension and cardiovascular disease increases dramatically after menopause in women, implicating estrogen as having a protective role in the cardiovascular system. However, recent large clinical trials have failed to show cardiovascular benefit, and have even demonstrated possible harmful effects, of opposed and unopposed estrogen in postmenopausal women. While these findings have led to a revision of guidelines such that they discourage the use of estrogen for primary or secondary prevention of heart disease in postmenopausal women, many investigators have attributed the negative results in clinical trials to several flaws in study design, including the older age of study participants and the initiation of estrogen late after menopause.Because almost all clinical trials use oral estrogen as the primary form of hormone supplementation, another question that has arisen is the importance of the route of estrogen administration with regards to the cardiovascular outcomes. During oral estrogen administration, the concentration of estradiol in the liver sinusoids is four to five times higher than that in the systemic circulation. This supraphysiologic concentration of estrogen in the liver can modulate the expression of many hepatic-derived proteins, which are not observed in premenopausal women. In contrast, transdermal estrogen delivers the hormone directly into the systemic circulation and, thus, avoids the first-pass hepatic effect.Although oral estrogen exerts a more favorable influence than transdermal estrogen on traditional cardiovascular risk factors such as high- and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol levels, recent studies have indicated that oral estrogen adversely influences many emerging risk factors in ways that are not seen with transdermal estrogen. Oral estrogen significantly increases levels of acute-phase proteins such as C-reactive protein and serum amyloid A; procoagulant factors such as prothrombin fragments 1+2; and several key enzymes involved in plaque disruption, while transdermal estrogen does not have these adverse effects.Whether the advantages of transdermal estrogen with regards to these risk factors will translate into improved clinical outcomes remains to be determined. Two ongoing clinical trials, KEEPS (Kronos Early Estrogen Prevention Study) and ELITE (Early versus Late Intervention Trial with Estradiol) are likely to provide invaluable information regarding the role of oral versus transdermal estrogen in younger postmenopausal women.

Pharmacology of estrogens and progestogens: influence of different routes of administration

This review comprises the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of natural and synthetic estrogens and progestogens used in contraception and therapy, with special consideration of hormone replacement therapy. The paper describes the mechanisms of action, the relation between structure and hormonal activity, differences in hormonal pattern and potency, peculiarities in the properties of certain steroids, tissue-specific effects, and the metabolism of the available estrogens and progestogens. The influence of the route of administration on pharmacokinetics, hormonal activity and metabolism is presented, and the effects of oral and transdermal treatment with estrogens on tissues, clinical and serum parameters are compared. The effects of oral, transdermal (patch and gel), intranasal, sublingual, buccal, vaginal, subcutaneous and intramuscular administration of estrogens, as well as of oral, vaginal, transdermal, intranasal, buccal, intramuscular and intrauterine application of progestogens are discussed. The various types of progestogens, their receptor interaction, hormonal pattern and the hormonal activity of certain metabolites are described in detail. The structural formulae, serum concentrations, binding affinities to steroid receptors and serum binding globulins, and the relative potencies of the available estrogens and progestins are presented. Differences in the tissue-specific effects of the various compounds and regimens and their potential implications with the risks and benefits of hormone replacement therapy are discussed.

The effect of the phytoestrogen genistein and hormone replacement therapy on homocysteine and C-reactive protein level in postmenopausal women

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect, in postmenopausal women, of the phytoestrogen genistein and hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on circulating two independent factors of cardiovascular risk: homocysteine and C-reactive protein (CRP).

METHODS

Ninety healthy postmenopausal women, from 50 to 60 years of age, were randomly assigned to receive genistein (n = 30; 54 mg/die) or continuous combined estrogen/progestin therapy (17-beta-estradiol 1 mg plus norethisterone acetate 0.5 mg) or placebo. Plasma homocysteine and serum CRP were measured at baseline and after 6 months of treatment.

RESULTS

In the genistein group, plasma homocysteine and serum CRP showed no statistically significant difference from baseline (homocysteine: 11.36 +/- 0.39 micromol/l; CRP: 1.73 +/- 0.31 mg/l) to 6 months treatment (homocysteine: 10.72 +/- 0.46 micromol/l; CRP: 2.13 +/- 0.45 mg/l), without any significant difference versus the placebo group (homocysteine: 11.25 +/- 0.43 micromol/l; CRP: 1.74 +/- 0.22 mg/l). In the HRT group there was a slight, but not significant reduction, of plasma homocysteine mean value from baseline (11.21 +/- 0.44 micromol/l) to 6 months treatment (10.45 +/- 0.38 micromol/l); whereas CRP mean value at the end of treatment (3.30 +/- 0.55 mg/l) was significantly higher from baseline (1.61 +/- 0.25 mg/l) (P < 0.01). However, after 6 months, no significant difference existed with the other two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The phytoestrogen genistein, after 6 months treatment, does not modify the independent cardiovascular risk linked to circulating homocysteine or CRP level. Our experience confirms critical increase of CRP serum level after HRT treatment, but not plasma homocysteine significant variation.