Effect of fluvastatin on intermediate density lipoprotein (remnants) and other lipoprotein levels in hypercholesterolemia

Statin therapy and lipoprotein(a) levels: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS 

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a causal and independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). People with elevated Lp(a) are often prescribed statins as they also often show elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. While statins are well-established in lowering LDL-C, their effect on Lp(a) remains unclear. We evaluated the effect of statins compared to placebo on Lp(a) and the effects of different types and intensities of statin therapy on Lp(a).

METHODS AND RESULTS 

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials with a statin and placebo arm. Medline and EMBASE were searched until August 2019. Quality assessment of studies was done using Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (RoB 2). Mean difference of absolute and percentage changes of Lp(a) in the statin vs. the placebo arms were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis. We compared effects of different types and intensities of statin therapy using subgroup- and network meta-analyses. Certainty of the evidence was determined using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation). Overall, 39 studies (24 448 participants) were included. Mean differences (95% confidence interval) of absolute and percentage changes in the statin vs. the placebo arms were 1.1 mg/dL (0.5-1.6, P < 0.0001) and 0.1% (-3.6% to 4.0%, P = 0.95), respectively (moderate-certainty evidence). None of the types of statins changed Lp(a) significantly compared to placebo (very low- to high-certainty evidence), as well as intensities of statin therapy (low- to moderate-certainty evidence).

CONCLUSION 

Statin therapy does not lead to clinically important differences in Lp(a) compared to placebo in patients at risk for CVD. Our findings suggest that in these patients, statin therapy will not change Lp(a)-associated CVD risk.

Fluvastatin for lowering lipids

BACKGROUND

Fluvastatin is thought to be the least potent statin on the market, however, the dose-related magnitude of effect of fluvastatin on blood lipids is not known.

OBJECTIVES

Primary objectiveTo quantify the effects of various doses of fluvastatin on blood total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL cholesterol), high-density lipoprotein (HDL cholesterol), and triglycerides in participants with and without evidence of cardiovascular disease.Secondary objectivesTo quantify the variability of the effect of various doses of fluvastatin.To quantify withdrawals due to adverse effects (WDAEs) in randomised placebo-controlled trials.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Hypertension Information Specialist searched the following databases for randomised controlled trials up to February 2017: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (2017, Issue 1), MEDLINE (1946 to February Week 2 2017), MEDLINE In-Process, MEDLINE Epub Ahead of Print, Embase (1974 to February Week 2 2017), the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, CDSR, DARE, Epistemonikos and ClinicalTrials.gov. We also contacted authors of relevant papers regarding further published and unpublished work. No language restrictions were applied.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised placebo-controlled and uncontrolled before and after trials evaluating the dose response of different fixed doses of fluvastatin on blood lipids over a duration of three to 12 weeks in participants of any age with and without evidence of cardiovascular disease.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed eligibility criteria for studies to be included, and extracted data. We entered data from placebo-controlled and uncontrolled before and after trials into Review Manager 5 as continuous and generic inverse variance data, respectively. WDAEs information was collected from the placebo-controlled trials. We assessed all trials using the 'Risk of bias' tool under the categories of sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding, incomplete outcome data, selective reporting, and other potential biases.

MAIN RESULTS

One-hundred and forty-five trials (36 placebo controlled and 109 before and after) evaluated the dose-related efficacy of fluvastatin in 18,846 participants. The participants were of any age with and without evidence of cardiovascular disease, and fluvastatin effects were studied within a treatment period of three to 12 weeks. Log dose-response data over doses of 2.5 mg to 80 mg revealed strong linear dose-related effects on blood total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol and a weak linear dose-related effect on blood triglycerides. There was no dose-related effect of fluvastatin on blood HDL cholesterol. Fluvastatin 10 mg/day to 80 mg/day reduced LDL cholesterol by 15% to 33%, total cholesterol by 11% to 25% and triglycerides by 3% to 17.5%. For every two-fold dose increase there was a 6.0% (95% CI 5.4 to 6.6) decrease in blood LDL cholesterol, a 4.2% (95% CI 3.7 to 4.8) decrease in blood total cholesterol and a 4.2% (95% CI 2.0 to 6.3) decrease in blood triglycerides. The quality of evidence for these effects was judged to be high. When compared to atorvastatin and rosuvastatin, fluvastatin was about 12-fold less potent than atorvastatin and 46-fold less potent than rosuvastatin at reducing LDL cholesterol. Very low quality of evidence showed no difference in WDAEs between fluvastatin and placebo in 16 of 36 of these short-term trials (risk ratio 1.52 (95% CI 0.94 to 2.45).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Fluvastatin lowers blood total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and triglyceride in a dose-dependent linear fashion. Based on the effect on LDL cholesterol, fluvastatin is 12-fold less potent than atorvastatin and 46-fold less potent than rosuvastatin. This review did not provide a good estimate of the incidence of harms associated with fluvastatin because of the short duration of the trials and the lack of reporting of adverse effects in 56% of the placebo-controlled trials.

Benefits and difficulties in measuring HDL subfractions and human paraoxonase-1 activity during statin treatment

Dyslipidaemia including decreased high density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration is one of several factors that have been implicated in increased cardiovascular risk. Since their introduction in the 1980s, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins) have emerged as the one of the best-selling class of medications to date, with numerous trials demonstrating powerful efficacy in preventing cardiovascular diseases. Although statins have been shown to modestly raise or not alter HDL-cholesterol, their effect on HDL subfractions and on HDL-associated enzymes including human paraoxonase-1 (PON1) has not yet been fully explored. This review summarizes the currently available data on the effect of statins on HDL subfractions and on PON1 activity with a particular emphasis on the clinical relevance of these effects. Moreover, methodological problems of HDL subfraction and PON1 activity determinations are also discussed.

Atorvastatin effect on the distribution of high-density lipoprotein subfractions and human paraoxonase activity

Human serum paraoxonase-1 (PON1) protects lipoproteins against oxidation by hydrolyzing lipid peroxides in oxidized low-density lipoprotein (LDL); therefore, it may protect against atherosclerosis. Changes in the ratio of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) subfractions may alter the stability and the antioxidant capacity of PON1. The aim of the study was to examine the effect of atorvastatin treatment on the distribution of HDL subfractions, LDL size, cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP), lecithin-cholesterol acyltransferase (LCAT), and PON1 activity. In all, 33 patients with type IIa and IIb hypercholesterolemia were involved in the study. LDL sizes and HDL subfractions were determined by gradient gel electrophoresis. CETP, LCAT, and PON1 activities were measured spectrophotometrically. Three months of treatment with atorvastatin 20 mg daily significantly increased the HDL3 (+8.13%) and decreased the HDL2a and HDL2b subfractions (-1.57% and -6.55%, respectively). The mean LDL size was significantly increased (+3.29%). The level of oxidized LDL was significantly decreased (-46.0%). The PON1 activity was augmented by the atorvastatin treatment (+5.0%). The CETP activity positively correlated with the HDL2b level and negatively correlated with the HDL3 and HDL2a levels. Atorvastatin alters the HDL subfractions, which may improve its antiatherogenic effect via enhancement of the PON1 activity.

Effect of fluvastatin on apolipoprotein-defined lipoprotein subclasses in patients with chronic renal insufficiency

According to the concept of apolipoprotein (apo)-defined lipoproteins, apoA-I-containing lipoproteins consist of two subclasses referred to as lipoprotein A-I (LpA-I) and lipoprotein A-I:A-II (LpA-I:A-II), and apoB-containing lipoproteins of five subclasses, namely lipoprotein B (LpB), lipoprotein B:C (LpB:C), lipoprotein B:E (LpB:E), lipoprotein B:C:E (LpB:C:E), and lipoprotein A-II:B:C:D:E (LpA-II:B:C:D:E). The purpose of this study was to determine the levels of apoA-I- and apoB-containing lipoprotein subclasses before and after fluvastatin treatment of patients with chronic renal insufficiency. ApoA-I- and apoB-containing lipoprotein subclasses were measured in 15 patients with chronic renal failure and 15 asymptomatic subjects. The effect of fluvastatin on lipoprotein subclasses was determined in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-way, treatment period crossover study. Patients were administered fluvastatin 40 mg/day or placebo during 8 weeks in a randomized order. Patients were characterized by significantly higher levels of LpB (P < 0.001), LpB:C (P < 0.001), and LpB:E (P < 0.05), and slightly higher levels of LpB:C:E and LpA-II:B:C:D:E than controls. The levels of LpA-I:A-II were significantly lower (P < 0.01) in patients than controls. Fluvastatin treatment reduced all apoB-containing subclasses, but only the reduced level of LpB subclass was statistically significant (P < 0.02). The levels of LpA-I and LpA-I:A-II were not affected. Fluvastatin treatment reduced and normalized LpB and LpB:E subclasses. Although slightly reduced, the levels of markedly atherogenic LpB:C subclass were not normalized. The potential role of LpB:C on the progression of coronary artery disease in chronic renal insufficiency remains to be determined in future studies.

Effects of fluvastatin slow-release (XL 80 mg) versus simvastatin (20 mg) on the lipid triad in patients with type 2 diabetes

The lipid triad is the association of small, dense (sd) low-density lipoprotein (LDL), low high-density lipoprotein (HDL), and hypertriglyceridemia, all of which play a role in coronary artery disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. Although statins have demonstrated clear positive effects on cardiovascular morbidity/mortality in patients with diabetes and on single components of the lipid triad, it remains controversial whether they affect all components of the triad in these patients. Therefore, we performed a single-center, parallel-group, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint (PROBE)-type comparison of fluvastatin extended-release (XL) 80 mg (n=48) and simvastatin 20 mg (n=46), each given once daily for 2 months to patients with type 2 diabetes with the lipid triad, who were enrolled after a 1-month lifestyle modification and dietary intervention program. After fluvastatin therapy, LDL (-51%; P<.01), apolipoprotein B (ApoB; -33%; P<.01), intermediate-density LDL (idLDL) (-14.3%; P<.05), sdLDL (-45%; P<.01), and triglycerides (-38%; P<.01) were significantly decreased, and HDL (+14.3%; P<.05) and apolipoprotein A-I (ApoA-I; +7%; P<.05) were increased; large buoyant (lb) LDL did not change (P=NS). Simvastatin therapy decreased LDL (-55.1%; P<.01), ApoB (-46%; P<.01), lbLDL (-33.3%; P<.05), idLDL (-22.7%; P<.05), sdLDL (-33.3%; P<.05), and triglycerides (-47.9%; P<.01); HDL was not changed (P=NS) after simvastatin, but ApoA-I was increased (+11.3%; P<.01). HDL increases (P<.01) and sdLDL decreases (P<.01) were significantly greater after fluvastatin compared with simvastatin therapy; LDL, triglycerides, ApoB, and idLDL changes were similar after both therapies (P=NS), and lbLDL decreases were greater with simvastatin therapy (P<.05). With both treatments, classic mean LDL and ApoB target levels were achieved in most patients. We conclude that the lipid triad can be controlled with fluvastatin XL 80 mg in patients with type 2 diabetes.

[Effect of ursodeoxycholic acid combined with statins in hypercholesterolemia treatment: a prospective clinical trial]

INTRODUCTION

A possible synergistic effect of the combination treatment with statins and ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) for reduction of total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol plasma levels has been suggested.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Random prospective clinical trial in 48 patients with primary or family hypercholesterolemia nonrespondent to simvastatin or atorvastatin treatment. The patients were assigned to a double statin dose group or to a group of combined treatment with simvastatin or atorvastatin and ursodeoxycholic acid for 4 months. Total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and triglycerides plasma levels were evaluated.

RESULTS

The administration of simvastatin 20 mg/day + UDCA 300 mg/day yielded significantly greater reduction of LDL cholesterol plasma levels compared with the group of patients treated with simvastatin 40 mg/day (118.8 +/- 8.6 vs 154.8 +/- 12.2, respectively; p = 0.0034). Moreover, addition of atorvastatin 20 mg/day to UDCA 300 mg/day was more effective that atorvastatin 40 mg/day in single-dose for LDL cholesterol reduction after 4 months of treatment (94.6 +/- 6.1 versus 138.7 +/- 9.0, respectively; p = 0.0037). No significant adverse effects were observed in any of the analyzed groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest the effectiveness of combination therapy with statins at low doses and UDCA in the treatment of patients with primary or family hypercholesterolemia initially nonrespondent to low doses of simvastatin or atorvastatin.

Rosuvastatin and fenofibrate alone and in combination in type 2 diabetes patients with combined hyperlipidaemia

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of rosuvastatin and fenofibrate alone and in combination in type 2 diabetes associated with combined hyperlipidaemia. A total of 216 patients with total cholesterol >/=200 mg/dl (>/=5.17 mmol/l) and triglycerides >/=200 and <800 mg/dl (>/=2.26 and <9.03 mmol/l) were randomised to one of two placebo groups, rosuvastatin 5 mg or rosuvastatin 10 mg for 6 weeks (fixed-dose phase). During the subsequent 18-week dose-titration phase, one placebo group received titrated rosuvastatin 10, 20 and 40 mg (placebo/rosuvastatin); one placebo group received titrated fenofibrate 67 mg once, twice and three times daily (placebo/fenofibrate); and patients receiving 5 or 10 mg rosuvastatin received titrated fenofibrate as above (rosuvastatin 5mg/fenofibrate and rosuvastatin 10 mg/fenofibrate groups). Doses were increased at 6-week intervals if low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol remained >50 mg/dl (>1.3 mmol/l). At 24 weeks, the placebo/rosuvastatin group and placebo per fenofibrate group had triglyceride reductions of 30.3% versus 33.6%, respectively (P = NS), and LDL cholesterol was reduced by 46.7% in the rosuvastatin group and increased by 0.7% in the fenofibrate group (P < 0.001). The triglyceride reduction in the rosuvastatin 10 mg/fenofibrate group (47.1%) was significantly greater than in the placebo/rosuvastatin group (P = 0.001), with no significant differences in other lipid measures found between these two groups. No significant differences in effect on high-density lipoprotein (HDL) were observed among treatment groups. In the fixed-dose phase, rosuvastatin 5 and 10 mg reduced triglycerides by 24.5 and 29.5%, respectively, and decreased LDL cholesterol by 40.7 and 45.8%, respectively. All treatments were well tolerated. These results indicated that rosuvastatin produces marked reductions in triglycerides and LDL cholesterol when used alone or in combination with fenofibrate in type 2 diabetes patients with elevated cholesterol and triglyceride levels and may constitute a valuable treatment option in the diabetic population.

Short-term efficacy and safety of extended-release fluvastatin in a large cohort of elderly patients

The efficacy and safety of lipid-lowering agents in elderly individuals have not been extensively assessed. This population generally takes more drugs concurrently than middle-aged patients, and are therefore at higher risk of drug-drug interactions. This large-scale, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study investigated the efficacy and safety of extended-release (XL) fluvastatin 80 mg once daily for up to 1 year in elderly patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. A total of 1229 patients (mean age, 75.5 years) were randomized. After 2 months of treatment, fluvastatin XL 80 mg significantly decreased plasma lipid levels from baseline compared with placebo; fluvastatin reduced total cholesterol by 25% compared with a decrease of 2.5% in the placebo group, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was -33% vs. -2.5%, respectively, and triglycerides were -13.3% vs. 2.9%, respectively (p<0.00001). The safety profile of fluvastatin XL was similar to that of placebo. Fluvastatin XL 80 mg once daily was well tolerated and effectively managed plasma lipid profiles in a large cohort of elderly patients. These findings are consistent with data obtained previously in younger recipients of fluvastatin XL 80 mg, and reinforce the safety of fluvastatin in a population at high risk of drug-drug interactions.

Treating dyslipidemic patients with lipid-modifying and combination therapies

Updated guidelines from the National Cholesterol Education Program give greater emphasis to lipoproteins other than low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL) than previous guidelines. Although statins remain first-line therapy for most patients to lower LDL, combination therapy is the next logical step in achieving goals in patients with mixed dyslipidemia or elevated LDL despite statin therapy. As the prevalence of diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and atherogenic dyslipidemia rises, the importance of treating the total lipid profile becomes even more crucial. Niacin, fibrates, and bile acid sequestrants are effective in combination with statins in lowering LDL, triglycerides, and total cholesterol levels and increasing high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL). Although combination therapies may increase the risk of myopathy, both fibrate-statin and niacin-statin combinations are considered safe. In addition, niacin-statin therapy reduces atherosclerotic progression and coronary events. New pharmacologic formulations exist that will further affect treatment: a single-tablet combination of lovastatin and extended-release niacin is available, as is ezetimibe, a cholesterol-absorption inhibitor. In all, both HDL and triglyceride levels correlate with cardiovascular risk and should be considered secondary targets of therapy. Combination therapy can be safe and effective and can be constructed to affect all lipoprotein parameters.

Are HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors underutilized in dialysis patients?

Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) treated with dialysis have a dramatically elevated rate of cardiovascular disease (CVD) compared to the general population. Lipid-lowering therapy with 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors ("statins") has been shown to markedly reduce cardiovascular risk in patients without renal failure, but their effect has not been fully studied in the dialysis population. In this article we will first discuss the known benefits of statin therapy in the general population and summarize the current guidelines for such therapy. We will then examine the evidence linking dyslipidemia and cardiac disease in the dialysis population and discuss possible pathophysiologic mechanisms by which statins could prevent cardiac disease in these patients. We will also review prior clinical studies of the effects of statins in patients on dialysis, with particular attention to the safety and efficacy of these drugs in this population. Finally, we will review how statins are currently being used in the care of dialysis patients and suggest whether an expanded utilization of these drugs could help reduce the enormously high rates of cardiac disease in this patient population.

Fluvastatin improves lipid abnormalities in patients with moderate to advanced chronic renal insufficiency

Chronic renal insufficiency is characterized by specific abnormalities in lipoprotein metabolism, affecting both apolipoprotein A (apo A)- and apo B-containing lipoproteins. To evaluate the effects of fluvastatin, a synthetic 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor, on renal dyslipoproteinemia, we performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-way, period cross-over study. Study patients were administered fluvastatin, 40 mg/d, or placebo during 8 weeks in randomized order. Forty-five nonnephrotic patients (28 men, 17 women) without diabetes with moderate to advanced chronic renal insufficiency participated in the study. Their mean age was 56.4 +/- 11.0 years. Glomerular filtration rate ranged from 12 to 44 mL/min/1.73 m2 of body surface area (mean, 27.5 +/- 10.5 mL/min/1.73 m2). Fluvastatin treatment resulted in significant reductions in the primary outcome variables low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C; -26%; P < 0.001), apo B (-21%; P < 0.001), and lipoprotein B complex (Lp-Bc) (-14%; P < 0.01). There were statistically significant differences between fluvastatin and placebo treatment for the secondary outcome variables total cholesterol (-19%), triglycerides (TGs; -13%), VLDL-C (-13%), apo E (-13%), and Lp-B (-22%). There was no treatment effect on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol or lipoprotein(a). Fluvastatin treatment was well tolerated, with no serious adverse events during the study. In conclusion, fluvastatin treatment was well tolerated in patients with moderately advanced renal insufficiency and led to a significant reduction in cholesterol-rich, but to a lesser extent in TG-rich, apo B-containing lipoproteins. It remains to be clarified whether these positive changes in lipoprotein profile also will result in attenuation of the atherosclerotic process in these patients, as well as beneficially affect the progression of chronic renal failure.

Effect of statin therapy on remnant lipoprotein cholesterol levels in patients with combined hyperlipidemia

Clinical trials with statins have demonstrated significant reductions in cardiovascular events. Remnant lipoproteins are independent predictors of cardiovascular events. Because of the paucity of data on the effect of statins on remnant lipoproteins, we tested the effect of pravastatin, simvastatin, and atorvastatin on remnant lipoprotein cholesterol (RLP-C) levels in a randomized crossover study in patients with combined hyperlipidemia. After a 6-week diet phase, patients (n=22) were randomized to pravastatin (40 mg/d), simvastatin (20 mg/d), or atorvastatin (10 mg/d) for 6 weeks, with a 3-week washout between each drug. All 3 drugs significantly decreased total and low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (P<0.001). Mean reduction in LDL cholesterol with pravastatin, simvastatin, and atorvastatin was 21%, 29%, and 32%, respectively. None of the drugs affected high density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. Median levels of triglycerides were significantly reduced with simvastatin (26%, P=0.001) and atorvastatin (24%, P=0.0001) but not with pravastatin (9%, P=0.18). Non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol decreased significantly with all 3 statins (20%, 29%, and 32% with pravastatin, simvastatin, and atorvastatin, respectively; P<0.001). Median RLP-C levels were significantly reduced with simvastatin (6%, P<0.05) and atorvastatin (25.9%, P<0.001) but not with pravastatin (2.9%, P=0.58). Thus, atorvastatin and simvastatin, in addition to reducing LDL cholesterol and triglyceride levels, significantly reduced RLP-C levels. This could be another potential mechanism to explain their cardiovascular benefits.

Apolipoprotein E polymorphisms and concentration in chronic diseases and drug responses

Apolipoprotein (apo) E is an important circulating and tissue protein involved in cholesterol homeostasis and many other functions. The common polymorphism in the coding region of the gene, four polymorphisms in the promoter region, other additional single nucleotide polymorphisms, as well as several apo E variants have been identified. The common coding polymorphism strongly influences the lipid metabolism and the circulating concentration of apo E itself. This polymorphism is at the origin of the implication of apo E in cardiovascular and neurodegenerative diseases, but also of the relation of apo E with longevity. Probably due to its many metabolic and functional consequences, apo E polymorphism has been shown to influence the responses of patients to several drugs (fibrates, statins, hormone replacement therapy, anti-Alzheimer drugs) or environmental interventions (black tea, alcohol, diet). Apo E genotyping may be clinically helpful in defining the risk of patients and their responses to therapeutics. Finally, circulating apo E concentration appears to be altered in diseases and can be modulated by some of the drugs cited above. This parameter can thus also give interesting clinical information and could be a therapeutic target, providing it is validated. At the present time, we cannot exclude that apo E concentration may be the most prominent apo E parameter to be considered in health and disease, while apo E polymorphisms would represent only secondary parameters influencing apo E concentration.

Lipid and apolipoprotein levels and distribution in patients with hypertriglyceridemia: effect of triglyceride reductions with atorvastatin

Atorvastatin is a new hepatic hydroxymethyl glutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor that has been demonstrated to be efficacious in reducing both triglyceride (TG) and cholesterol (CHOL) levels in humans. Twenty-seven (N = 27) patients with primary hypertriglyceridemia (TG > 350 mg/dL) were studied before and after 4 weeks on atorvastatin treatment at a dosage of either 20 (n = 16) or 80 (n = 11) mg/d. The present report examines changes in the plasma levels of several apolipoproteins, including apolipoprotein C-II (apoC-II), apoC-III, and apoE, after atorvastatin. Dose-dependent reductions in both CHOL (20.3% v 43.1%) and TG (26.5% v 45.8%) for the low and high dose, respectively, have been reported in these individuals. In addition to the reductions in apoB commonly associated with the use of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, significant reductions in apoE (37% and 49%), apoC-II (28% and 42%), and apoC-III (18% and 30%) were observed with this agent at the 20- and 80-mg/d dosage, respectively. Using fast protein liquid chromatography (FPLC) to fractionate whole plasma according to particle size, the effect of atorvastatin on lipid and apolipoprotein distribution in 20 lipoprotein fractions was also determined. Our results indicate that after 4 weeks on atorvastatin, (1) there was a 2-fold increase in the CHOL content as assessed by the CHOL/apoB ratio for 13 subfractions from very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) to small low-density lipoprotein (LDL); (2) there was a statistically significant reduction in the percentage of plasma apoB associated with VLDL-sized particles (30.5% v 26.8%); (3) there was a preferential reduction in plasma apoE from non-apoB-containing lipoproteins with treatment; (4) the losses of apoC-II and apoC-III, on the other hand, were comparable for all lipoprotein fractions; and (5) the fraction of plasma TG associated with HDL was increased after treatment. These changes in lipids and apolipoproteins did not depend on the dose of atorvastatin. There was, on the other hand, a dose-dependent reduction in cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) activity, defined as the percentage of 3H-cholesteryl oleate transferred from high-density lipoprotein (HDL) to LDL. CETP activity was reduced by 10.3% and 26.4% with the low and high dose of atorvastatin. Together, these composition data would be consistent with a net reduction in the number of TG-rich lipoproteins that may be explained by (1) a reduction in VLDL synthesis, (2) a preferential removal of VLDL without conversion to LDL, and (3) a preferential accelerated removal of a subpopulation of LDL.

Efficacy and muscle safety of fluvastatin in cyclosporine-treated cardiac and renal transplant recipients: an exercise provocation test

BACKGROUND

Dyslipidemia is found in the majority of renal and cardiac transplant recipients. Although 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors significantly lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels, such treatment has been associated with muscle toxicity, especially when used in combination with cyclosporine (CsA). We investigated the efficacy and muscle safety of fluvastatin, a new 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor, in CsA-treated transplant recipients.

METHODS

The efficacy was determined by measuring the lipid profile before and after 8 weeks of fluvastatin therapy. As parameter for possible muscle damage, the rise in serum levels of the muscle proteins creatine kinase and myoglobin was measured after an exercise provocation test (30 min on a bicycle ergometer at 60% of their maximal work load) before and during fluvastatin therapy. Nineteen CsA-treated renal and cardiac transplant recipients with hypercholesterolemia were selected.

RESULTS

After 8 weeks of treatment with a dose of fluvastatin necessary to reduce LDL-C below 3.5 mmol/L (20 mg for 3 and 40 mg for 16 patients), total cholesterol was lowered by 20% and LDL-C by 30%, and HDL2-C was increased by 35% (all P<0.01). The rise in creatine kinase after exercise before and during fluvastatin therapy was, respectively, 40% and 51%, and the rise in myoglobin was 64% and 50%. These rises were not significantly different. Hence, there was no indication for subclinical muscle pathology by fluvastatin use. Fluvastatin was well tolerated, and no adverse effects on liver or kidney function were found.

CONCLUSIONS

Fluvastatin can effectively lower LDL-C in CsA-treated renal and cardiac transplant recipients, without demonstrable adverse effects.

Efficacy of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme a reductase inhibitors in the treatment of patients with hypercholesterolemia: a meta-analysis of clinical trials

Recent studies have documented the long-term impact of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors on mortality and morbidity related to coronary heart disease, establishing the link between lowering cholesterol levels and reducing cardiac events. Our study was a comparative literature review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of four HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors-fluvastatin, lovastatin, pravastatin, and simvastatin-used in the treatment of patients with hypercholesterolemia. The data sources for our meta-analysis of the efficacy of these cholesterol-lowering agents were 52 randomized, double-masked clinical trials with at least 25 patients per treatment arm. The results showed all four agents to be effective in reducing blood cholesterol levels. We computed summary efficacy estimates for all published dose strengths for the four agents. Fluvastatin 20 mg/d reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels by 21.0% and total cholesterol (total-C) levels by 16.4%; fluvastatin 40 mg/d reduced these levels by 23.1% and 17.7%, respectively. Lovastatin 20 mg/d reduced LDL-C levels by 24.9% and total-C levels by 17.7%; lovastatin 80 mg/d reduced these levels by 39.8% and 29.2%, respectively. Pravastatin 10 mg/d reduced LDL-C levels by 19.3% and total-C levels by 14.0%; pravastatin 80 mg/d reduced these levels by 37.7% and 28.7%, respectively. Simvastatin 2.5 mg/d reduced LDL-C levels by 22.9% and total-C levels by 15.7%; simvastatin 40 mg/d reduced these levels by 40.7% and 29.7%, respectively. The results of our meta-analysis can be used in conjunction with treatment objectives and comparative cost-effectiveness data for these agents to decide appropriate therapeutic alternatives for individual patients.