Findings of prognostic value in patients with incomplete bilateral bundle branch block complicating acute myocardial infarction

Factors associated with persistent and transient fascicular blocks in anterior wall acute myocardial infarction

To determine the factors associated with persistent and transient fascicular blocks, 144 patients with Q-wave anterior wall acute myocardial infarction (AMI) were studied. Thirty-three patients had new onset of fascicular block considered to be a consequence of AMI. Multivariate analysis using 16 clinical variables revealed that the number of asynergic segments, serum potassium level and pericardial rub were significant factors related to the occurrence of fascicular block. Among the 33 patients with fascicular block, 18 had persistent (group 1) and 15 had transient (group 2) fascicular blocks. When the 2 groups with fascicular block were compared, group 1 had significantly more asynergic segments than group 2 (4.7 +/- 1.2 vs 3.7 +/- 1.6, respectively), whereas pericardial rubs were observed significantly more in group 2 (67%) than in group 1 (28%). Therefore, the inflammatory process of AMI was 1 of the mechanisms related to the occurrence of a transient fascicular block and a more extensive myocardial necrosis was associated with a persistent fascicular block.

Programmed stimulation after anterior myocardial infarction complicated by bundle branch block--late ventricular tachyarrhythmias and outcome

One hundred and thirty consecutive patients with anterior myocardial infarction complicated by bundle branch block were retrospectively analyzed. Sixty died within 1 week of infarction. Of the remaining 70 patients, 36 had electrophysiology study with programmed stimulation 8-90 (mean 20) days after infarction. Of these, nine patients (35%) who clinically had not manifested either ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation more than 72 hours after infarction, had inducible ventricular tachycardia which was sustained more than 30 seconds in eight patients. By contrast, assessment of atrioventricular conduction added little to clinical management, long-term follow-up, extending up to 127 months, was available both in those patients whose therapy was directed by electrophysiology study, and was assessed among the other 34 patients who survived at least 7 days after myocardial infarction, but who did not undergo electrophysiology study. While the overall mortality was 55%, the majority of deaths (22/35) occurred within 4 months of infarction and many long-term survivors enjoy a gratifying quality of life. Although programmed stimulation in survivors of anterior myocardial infarction complicated by bundle branch block may identify a high risk subgroup, a prospective randomized trial is required to define the utility of more aggressive stimulation protocols following NASPE recommendations, to identify subgroups of patients in whom newer therapeutic interventions, including antiarrhythmic agents, electrical devices and surgery may be indicated.

The Birmingham Trial of permanent pacing in patients with intraventricular conduction disorders after acute myocardial infarction

Patients surviving 2 weeks after myocardial infarction who had persistent conduction disorder (right bundle branch block alone or associated with left anterior or posterior hemiblock [LPH] or LPH alone) were allocated at random to permanent pacing or control groups. Throughout follow-up, up to 5 years, there was no significant difference in survival: at 2 years 14 of 23 (61%) of paced patients had died compared with 11 of 27 (41%) control patients. Progression of conduction disorder was not observed and measurement of infranodal conduction time (HV interval) did not predict outcome. Ventricular tachyarrhythmias were an important cause of death in these patients and pacing appears to offer no benefit.

His bundle electrogram in patients with acute myocardial infarction

Thirty-seven patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by atrioventricular or bundle branch block, or a combination of both, has His bundle electrogram studies performed during their stay in the coronary care unit. The acute mortality of the 14 patients with a complicating bundle branch was 50%. Pump failure was the main cause of death. Three patients in this group had a prolonged H-V interval and one patient had a split blundle of His. The presence or absence of a prolonged H-V interval did not affect mortality in this group of patients. The acute mortality of the 16 patients with an inferior wall myocardial infarction was 6%. The H-V interval was normal in all but one of these patients. The atrioventricular block was caused by a proximal block in all cases. The acute mortality of the seven patients with an anterior wall myocardial infarction was 29%. The H-V interval was prolonged in two of seven patients. Pump failure was the acute cause of the deaths. The presence or absence of a prolonged H-V interval did not affect mortality in this group of patients.

Right bundle branch block with periods of alternating left anterior and left posterior hemiblock. Clinical evidence of incomplete fascicular block

The case presented had an electrocardiographic pattern of complete right bundle branch block with alternating periods of left anterior hemiblock and left posterior hemiblock. During one of the periods of alternating hemiblock, an His bundle electrogram was recorded and the His Purkinje (H-V interval) conduction time was within normal limits. In a second episode of alternating hemoblock, periods of Mobitz type II second-degree A-V block were noted. It is postulated that this case provides clinical evidence that incomplete block of a fascicle may occur in spite of an electrocardiographic pattern of complete fascicular block. It is thought that the periods of alternating hemiblock result from a changing relationship between conduction velocity and refractory period.

The clinical significance of bundle branch block complicating acute myocardial infarction. 1. Clinical characteristics, hospital mortality, and one-year follow-up

To provide an understanding of the clinical characteristics of patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) and bundle branch block, experience from five centers was accumulated. Patients in whom bundle branch block first appeared after the onset of cardiogenic shock were excluded. In 432 patients, the most common types of block were left (38%) and right with left anterior fascicular block (34%). In 42% of the patients, bundle branch block was new. Progression to high degree (second or third degree) atrioventricular (AV) block via a Type II pattern occurred in 22% of the patients. Hospital and first year follow-up mortality rates were 28% and 28%, respectively. Only 46% of the patients developed pulmonary edema or shock (Killip Class III or IV), and hospital mortality was related to the amount of heart failure (8%, 7%, 27%, 83% for Killip Classes I-IV, respectively). Patients with progression to second degree or third degree AV block via a Type II pattern had increased hospital mortality compared with patients without this complication (47% vs 23%, P less than 0.001). In the absence of pulmonary edema or shock, patients with Type II second degree or third degree AV block still had a higher mortality rate than patients without advanced AV block (31% vs 2%, P less than 0.005), with nearly all the deaths due to abrupt development of AV block. Thus, in many patients MI with bundle branch block is associated with severe heart failure. However, this was not true for a majority of the patients, in whom therapy aimed at preventing morbidity and mortality due to the bradyarrhythmia of advanced AV block might be beneficial.

The clinical significance of bundle branch block complicating acute myocardial infarction. 2. Indications for temporary and permanent pacemaker insertion

The indication for prophylactic temporary and permanent pacing during acute myocardial infarction (MI) complicated by bundle branch block is high risk of progression via a Type II pattern to second or third degree (high degree) AV block during hospitalization or follow-up. In this study, determinants of high degree AV block during hospitalization and sudden death or recurrent high degree block during the first year of follow-up were examined in 432 patients with MI and bundle branch block. Timing of onset of bundle branch block, the involved fascicles, and the PR interval were examined as determinants of risk of progression to high degree AV block during MI. At highest risk were 186 patients with blocks involving the right bundle and at least one fascicle of the left bundle which were not documented on prior electrocardiograms. Risk was similar with (38%) or without (31%) accompanying first degree AV block. Patients with transient high degree AV block during MI had a 28% incidence of sudden death or recurrent high degree block during the first year of follow-up. Patients not continuously paced had a higher incidence of sudden death or recurrent high degree block than patients continuously paced (65% vs 10%, P less than 0.001). Sudden death during follow-up also occurred in 13% of patients without high degree block during MI. A subgroup with 1) documented prior MI, 2) anterior or indeterminant acute MI, and 3) no symptoms of cardiac failure had a 35% risk of sudden death. The role of permanent pacing in this group is unknown. Thus, patients at high risk of high degree AV block should receive prophylactic temporary pacing. Patients who survive high degree block with MI should receive temporary and then permanent pacing. Patients without high degree AV block during MI who nervertheless have a high risk of sudden death may benefit from permanent pacing.

The prognostic value of the HV interval in patients with acute myocardial infarction and bundle branch block

HV intervals were measured in 42 of 119 patients in the acute phase of myocardial infarction associated with bundle branch block (BBB). The mean HV intervals of patients with right, left and incomplete bilateral BBB were similar. The hospital and subsequent mortality of patients with prolonged HV intervals did not differ significantly from that of patients with normal HV intervals. The HV interval appeared to remain stable over the following months in most patients in whom it was remeasured. We conclude that the HV interval cannot be used to select patients who might benefit from prophylactic long term pacing.

Long-term survival of patients with incomplete bundle-branch block complicating acute myocardial infarction

Electrocardiograms and His bundle electrograms were reviewed in 28 patients with incomplete bilateral bundle-branch block complicating acute myocardial infarction. All had a His bundle electrogram at the time of pacemaker insertion; 10 had a second one. Of 23 patients with an initially abnormal HV interval (55 ms or greater), 15 died (65%), while only one died (20%) in the group of 5 with a normal HV interval. This difference is not statistically significant. Sequential His bundle electrograms were done in 6 of the 8 survivors with an initially abnormal HV interval, and 4 showed 10 to 15 ms decrease in HV interval. The disappearance of incomplete bilateral bundle-branch block occurred significantly more often in patients who survived (7 of 12) when compared with those who did not survive (2 of 16) (P less than 0.05). It is concluded that long-term survival is po-sible after incomplete bilateral bundle-branch block complicating acute myocardial infarction. The characteristics of the survivors include an initially normal HV interval, transient incomplete belateral bundle-branch block and a decreasing HV interval if it were initially abnormal.

His bundle electrogram in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by atrioventricular or intraventricular conduction disturbances

Seventy-two patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by atrioventricular or bundle-branch block or a combination of both had His bundle electrogram studies performed during their stay in the coronary care unit. In 19 of the 72 patients a repeat His bundle electrogram was performed before discharge from hospital. These studies demonstrated that 30 of the 32 patients with atrioventricular block and narrow QRS complexes had a block above the origin othe His spike (proximal block). Eleven patients in this group had repeat His bundle electrograms performed before discharge and in 3 patients there was evidence of residual atrioventricular nodal dysfunction. Both the hospital and follow-up mortality in this group was low and there was no evidence to suggest that permanent pacing would benefit these patients. Of the 18 patients with bundle-branch block and a normal PR interval, 9 had prolongation of the HV interval, but there was no difference in mortality in patients with normal or prolonged HV intervals. Twenty-two patients with bundle-branch block also developed atrioventricular block. In 5 of these patients the site of the AV block was proximal and in 14 it was distal, while 3 patients had both proximal and distal block. The hospital mortality in those patients who progressed to second- or third-degree atrioventricular block was considerably higher than in those patients who remained in first-degree atrioventricular block.

[Clinical value of His bundle electrography (author's transl)]

Methodical problems, indication and clinical implication of His bundle electrography are discussed. In 200 successive patients undergoing His bundle electrography and atrial stimulation the indication was as follows: Intraventricular conduction defects in 24%, A-V block in 21%, sick sinus syndrome in 20%, preexcitation in 17%, and complex arrhythmias in the remaining cases. In 38% of the patients did the HBE prove to be of help by providing information not available after analysis of the surface ECG. In 22% this technique contributed essentially to the management of these patients. In spite of dificiencies of our knowledge of the basic mechanisms, specific therapy, and prognosis of various arrhythmias His bundle electrography is clinically useful in selected patients. Therefore, this method has become a routinely used clinical tool.

Factors influencing prognosis of bundle branch block complicating acute antero-septal infarction. The value of his bundle recordings

Of 50 consecutive patients with bundle branch block (BBB) complicating acute antero-septal infarction, 37 died in hospital. Patients with BBB of delayed onset or BBB of short duration had a significantly lower mortality. His bundle recordings were made in 35 patients without pulmonary edema or shock at the time of appearance of BBB. Thirteen of 16 patients with prolonged H-V intervals died compared to nine of 19 with normal H-V intervals ( P < 0.05). In patients with bifascicular block, 11 of 15 with prolonged H-V intervals developed complete A-V block compared to one of ten with normal H-V intervals ( P < 0.005).

Twenty-five of 33 patients with normal P-R intervals died compared to eight of 12 with first degree A-V block. Seven of 15 patients with prolonged H-V intervals had normal P-R intervals and four of these seven developed complete A-V block. We conclude that the length of P-R interval has no prognostic significance and is of limited value in predicting both prolonged H-V interval and development of complete A-V block. In contrast, His bundle recordings are of value in identifying patients with BBB complicating antero-septal infarction who are at immediate high risk for development of complete A-V block and death.