Effect of intermittent left bundle branch block on left ventricular performance in the normal heart

Transient left bundle branch block after posture change to the prone position during general anesthesia: A case report

RATIONALE

The prone position is commonly used in spinal surgery. There have been many studies on hemodynamic changes in the prone position during general anesthesia. We report a rare case of transient left bundle branch block (LBBB) in a prone position.

PATIENT CONCERN

Electrocardiogram (ECG) of a 64-year-old man scheduled for spinal surgery showed normal sinus rhythm change to LBBB after posture change to the prone position.

DIAGNOSIS

Twelve lead ECG revealed LBBB. His coronary angio-computed tomography results showed right coronary artery with 30% to 40% stenosis and left circumflex artery with 40% to 50% stenosis. The patient was diagnosed with stable angina and second-degree atrioventricular block of Mobitz type II.

INTERVENTION

Nitroglycerin was administered intravenously during surgery. Adequate oxygen was supplied to the patient. After surgery, the patient was prescribed clopidogrel, statins, angiotensin II receptor blocker, and a permanent pacemaker was inserted.

OUTCOME

Surgery was completed without complications. After surgery, the transient LBBB changed to a normal sinus rhythm. The patient did not complain of chest pain or dyspnea.

LESSON

The prone position causes significant hemodynamic changes. A high risk of cardiovascular disease may cause ischemic heart disease and ECG changes. Therefore, careful management is necessary.

Rate-Dependent Left Bundle Branch Block in an Ambulatory Surgery Patient: A Case Report

A 52-year-old woman, ASA II (American Society of Anesthesia classification II) scheduled for cholecystectomy in an ambulatory center, exhibited a wide-complex tachycardia with ectopy on the monitor after induction with propofol and succinylcholine. Blood pressure remained stable; amiodarone was administered for presumed ventricular tachycardia. A 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) showed a new left bundle branch block (LBBB) at 98 beats per minute (bpm), which resolved when the heart rate slowed. Surgery was postponed, and both the LBBB and ectopy recurred frequently during the next 24 hours in the intensive care unit, particularly at heart rates >90 bpm. Troponins were normal, and the patient was diagnosed with a rate-dependent LBBB and cleared for surgery.

Effect of Left Bundle Branch Block on Systolic and Diastolic Function of Left Ventricle in Heart Failure

This study was designed to examine the effect of left bundle branch block (LBBB) on systolic and diastolic function of the left ventricle (LV) in patients with heart failure and in normal subjects. Thirty-six patients with heart failure and LBBB (group I), 36 patients with heart failure with normal conduction (group II), and 41 subjects with isolated LBBB (group III) were compared. Coronary angiography was performed and LV end diastolic pressure was calculated. Echocardiography was performed on all patients. LV ejection fraction and mean rate of circum ferential shortening were calculated. The following Doppler parameters were evaluated: peak rapid filling velocity (E wave), peak atrial filling velocity (A wave), E- and A-wave integrals, E- wave acceleration time and deceleration time (EDT) and rates (EAR and EDR), the E/A ratio and its integral, and diastolic flow time (DT). The ejection time, isovolumetric relaxation time (IRT), and preejection period were measured using the aortic and mitral flow. LV end diastolic pressure was calculated as 28 ±4 mm Hg, 22 ±5 mm Hg, and 15 ±3 mm Hg in groups I, II, and III, respectively. Although the systolic function parameters in group III patients were different, the diastolic function parameters of group II were found to be quite similar to those of group III patients. Comparison of group I patients with group II patients showed that there was a similarity between LV systolic function parameters while the diastolic function parameters were different (E/A, p = 0.004; EAR, p<0.001; EDR, p<0.001; EDT, p<0.001; IRT, p = 0.024; DT, p=0.03). In conclusion, this study evaluating the effects of LBBB in normal subjects (isolated LBBB) and patients with heart failure showed that LBBB causes diastolic function impairment in normal subjects similar to those of patients with heart failure, and also increases impairment of diastolic function in patients with heart failure.

Hemodynamic implications of left bundle branch block

Left bundle branch block (LBBB), traditionally viewed as an electrophysiologic abnormality, is increasingly recognized for its profound hemodynamic effects. LBBB causes asynchronous myocardial activation, which, in turn, may trigger ventricular remodeling. Exercise nuclear studies frequently show reversible perfusion defects in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease and some patients with intermittent LBBB develop angina coincident with the onset of LBBB. It is uncertain, however, if these phenomena are because of myocardial ischemia or ventricular asynergy. LBBB is associated with impaired systolic and diastolic function. In patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), LBBB is accompanied by progressive left ventricular (LV) dilatation and mitral regurgitation. It is not known whether LBBB is the cause or the consequence of LV dilatation. DCM patients with LBBB, as compared to those with normal intraventricular conduction, are more likely to have a nonischemic etiology, profound LV dilatation, lower ejection fraction, increased symptomatology, and shorter survival. Patients with DCM and acceleration-dependent LBBB may benefit from restoration of a narrow QRS complex by suppressing the heart rate with beta-blocker. There is extensive research underway in patients with DCM and LBBB to evaluate the short and long-term effects of normalization of ventricular activation sequence with high septal, LV, or biventricular pacing.

Transient left bundle branch block induced by left-sided cardiac catheterization in patients without pre-existing conduction abnormalities

A traumatic left bundle branch block (LBBB) is uncommon in a patient with intact atrioventricular conduction. Three of our patients developed LBBB during a left-sided catheterization. Two patients suffered from angina pectoris and the other had an abdominal aneurysm. Two of them had a history of hypertension. None of the patients had ever shown any conduction abnormalities before the catheterization. The electrocardiogram just before the examination was normal in all 3 patients. LBBB was observed when a catheter was introduced into the left ventricle, and lasted 2--4 min without significant change in heart rates. Examination revealed no significant stenosis proximal to the first septal perforator and normal left ventricular contraction in all patients. One patient developed permanent LBBB 14 months later. Catheter-induced LBBB may occur easily with certain anatomical characteristics of the left bundle branch or the distal His bundle, with or without some concealed damage to the conduction system. It is important to keep this complication in mind and to pay adequate attention to patients' electrocardiograms as well as their angiographical findings, especially in those with pre-existing right bundle branch block.

Systolic excursion of the mitral annulus to assess septal function in paradoxic septal motion

To determine whether mitral valve annulus displacement (MVAD) can be used to assess septal contractility in patients with paradoxical septal motion, we assessed four atrioventricular regions (septum, lateral wall, anterior wall, and inferior wall) by MVAD in 80 consecutive patients. The patients were divided into five groups: group 1 (control) (n = 20), normal left ventricular (LV) systolic function; group 2 (n = 15), paradoxical septal motion resulting from left bundle branch block (LBBB) and normal segmental and global LV systolic function; group 3 (n = 19), paradoxical septal motion as a result of cardiac surgery, and normal segmental and global LV systolic function; group 4 (n = 11), paradoxical septal motion resulting from LBBB, dilated cardiomyopathy, and severely depressed LV systolic function; group 5 (n = 15), septal hypokinesis with either normal or mildly depressed global LV systolic function. In groups 1, 2, and 3, 80% to 100% of patients had septal and other regional MVAD > or = 1.0 cm. The average MVAD in group 4 (dilated cardiomyopathy), was significantly decreased ( < or = 0.8 cm) in all four regions (p < 0.01 compared with groups 1, 2, and 3). In group 5 (septal hypokinesis), the septal MVAD was > or = 1.0 cm in only 13% of the patients (p < 0.025 compared with groups 1, 2, and 3). In conclusion, patients with paradoxical septal motion caused by LBBB or cardiac surgery have preserved septal contractility when evaluated by MVAD.

Functional abnormalities in isolated left bundle branch block. The effect of interventricular asynchrony

Eighteen patients with isolated left bundle branch block (LBBB) were compared with 10 normal control subjects. Apexcardiograms, phonocardiograms, electrocardiograms, two-dimensional and dual M-mode echocardiograms, and radionuclide ventriculograms (RNV) were performed. There were no differences in the timing of right ventricular events between LBBB and normal subjects; however, striking delays in left ventricular systolic and diastolic events were apparent in the LBBB group. The delay was associated with shortening of left ventricular diastole and resultant increase in the ratio of right to left ventricular diastolic time in LBBB (1.2 +/- 0.08) compared with normal (1.0 +/- 0.06), p less than 0.0001. First heart sound (S1) amplitude, expressed as the ratio S1/S2, was decreased in LBBB compared with normal (0.67 +/- 0.2 compared with 1.34 +/- 0.25, p less than 0.01), in part due to wide separation of the valvular contributors to S1. The abnormal interventricular septal motion in LBBB corresponded to periods of asynchrony in contraction, ejection, end systole, and end diastole between right and left ventricles. Radionuclide ventriculograms revealed decreased regional ejection fraction of the septum in LBBB (40 +/- 16%) compared with 67 +/- 7% in normal subjects (p less than 0.001), while the apical and lateral regional ejection fractions were similar in the two groups. This loss of septal contribution resulted in a reduction in global ejection fraction in LBBB compared to normals (54 +/- 7% compared with 62 +/- 5%, p less than 0.005).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Electrocardiographically discrete right and left ventricular QRS complexes: a case report

A patient with congestive cardiomyopathy manifested a right ventricular QRS followed after 80 msec. by a left ventricular QRS in response to a single atrial depolarization. The ventricular sequence was reversible when the left ventricle was paced directly. Virtually the entire ipsilateral ventricular ejection period occurred during diastolic filling of the contralateral ventricle. Triggered left ventricular pacing, using the right ventricular electrogram as trigger, shortened the QRSRV-QRSLV interval and resulted in a reduction of left ventricular filling pressure and a significant rise in cardiac output. These findings indicated an independent contribution of this unique form of interventricular conduction disturbance to deterioration in hemodynamic performance.

Left bundle branch block: a continuously evolving concept

Eppinger and Rothberger in 1909 and 1910 first acknowledged the importance of the conduction system, yet a confusion of the pattern of left bundle branch block with right bundle branch block resulted which persisted for 25 years. In left bundle branch block, right ventricular endocardial activation begins before, and is often completed before, initiation of left ventricular endocardial activation. Most likely, right to left septal activation then follows, resulting in left ventricular endocardial activation. Although it is hazardous to make definitive diagnoses of infarction in the presence of left bundle branch block, clues do exist. Benign left bundle branch block is rare; usually disease becomes manifest. Electrocardiographic criteria of hypertrophy are not as helpful in older patients with chronic left bundle branch block (mainly because of the very high incidence of left ventricular hypertrophy) as in younger patients with block of nonatherosclerotic origin. Left bundle branch block is often associated with other abnormalities of the conduction system. Fascicular blocks may mask or mimic myocardial infarction. Left posterior fascicular block is most often an indicator of left ventricular myocardial deficit if right ventricular enlargement is eliminated. Mortality is higher in patients with associated left axis deviation than in those with a normal axis, although the incidence of progression of atrioventricular (AV) block is low. In symptomatic patients with prolonged His to ventricular intervals, the incidence of progression of AV block is higher (12%). Preexisting left bundle branch block in the absence of clinical evidence of heart disease is rare, yet carries with it a slightly increased mortality. Newly acquired left bundle branch block carries a 10-fold increase in mortality; the incidence of sudden death as the first manifestation of heart disease is increased 10-fold.

Etiology and clinical significance of new fascicular conduction defects following coronary bypass surgery

Two hundred consecutive patients undergoing only coronary bypass surgery were studied. Forty-five patients (group A) developed new fascicular conduction blocks and 155 patients (group B) did not. The 45 patients in group A developed the following fascicular conduction blocks: right bundle branch block 47%, right bundle branch block and left anterior hemiblock 8%, right bundle branch block and first-degree atrioventricular block 2%, left anterior hemiblock 11%, left bundle branch block 18%, right bundle branch block-left anterior hemiblock and first-degree atrioventricular block 5%. There were no significant differences in sex, incidence of diabetes, number of grafts performed, ejection fraction (less than 55%), and perioperative infarction. Group A patients were older (p less than 0.01). Hypertension was found frequently in group A (27 vs 45 patients; p less than 0.01) and was present for a mean of 12.4 years in group A and 4.9 years in group B (p less than 0.01). Preoperative use of digitalis was found in 14 (31%) patients in group A and in 18 (12%) patients in group B (p less than 0.01). Twenty-one (47%) patients in group A had significant disease (greater than 70%) of the left main coronary artery as compared to 17 (10.9%) in group B (p less than 0.001). There was no difference in the recurrence of angina or the survival rate at 14 months. In conclusion, the incidence of new fascicular conduction block after bypass surgery is 22.5%. Long-standing hypertension, left main coronary disease, and the preoperative use of digitalis appear to be predisposing factors. New fascicular conduction block does not affect prognosis.

Effects of altered site of electrical activation on myocardial performance during inotropic stimulation

The effects of altering the site of electrical activation on responses to isoproterenol (ISO) and treadmill exercise were examined in mongrel dogs instrumented for long-term measurement of left ventricular pressure, left ventricular dP/dt, coronary blood flow, cardiac output, left ventricular diameters, and mean arterial pressure and O2 content in the coronary sinus and aorta. During spontaneous rhythm, 0.2 micrograms/kg/min ISO increased heart rate by 90 +/- 7 beats/min, left ventricular dP/dt by 2479 +/- 301 mm Hg/sec, cardiac output by 3.5 +/- 0.9 liters/min, coronary blood flow by 30.4 +/- 3.9 ml/min, and myocardial oxygen consumption (MVO2) by 3.91 +/- 0.84 ml/min. During right atrial pacing at 193 +/- 7 beats/min, the effects of ISO were not different from the effects during spontaneous rhythm, with the exception of a lesser increase in coronary blood flow and lesser reductions in coronary resistance and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter and pressure. During right ventricular pacing at an identical rate, ISO increased left ventricular dP/dt (1140 +/- 158 mm Hg/sec) and cardiac output (2.2 +/- 0.5 liters/min) significantly less (p less than .025) than during either sinus rhythm or right atrial pacing, while MVO2 rose to a higher value. During right ventricular pacing the changes in mean arterial pressure and left ventricular end-diastolic diameters with ISO were not significantly different from those during right atrial pacing. Treadmill exercise induced significantly smaller (p less than .025) increases in left ventricular dP/dt during right ventricular pacing as compared with during either right atrial pacing or sinus rhythm, while MVO2 rose to a higher value.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Intraoperative diagnosis of rate-dependent bundle branch block

Rate-dependent left bundle branch block (LBBB) occasionally occurs during anaesthesia when the heart rate exceeds a critical value. While it is usually a benign disorder, it may mask the electrocardiographic manifestations of myocardial ischaemia and the ST-T wave pattern associated with LBBB may be mistaken for those of ischaemia. This case report presents two cases in which rate-dependent LBBB was clearly documented during the perioperative period. It demonstrates the use of pharmacologic agents (e.g., atropine and neostigmine) and physiologic manipulations (e.g., carotid sinus massage) to alter the heart rate and confirm the diagnosis of benign rate-dependent LBBB in the operating room. These interventions should be used with caution in patients who have hypertension, angina, cerebrovascular, or AV node disease or in the setting of myocardial ischaemia or severe bundle branch disease.

Alteration of left ventricular performance by left bundle branch block simulated with atrioventricular sequential pacing

The effects of atrioventricular (AV) sequential pacing-induced left bundle branch block (LBBB) on left ventricular (LV) performance were evaluated during cardiac catheterization in 9 randomly selected patients being investigated for chest pain. All patients were in normal sinus rhythm with a normal P-R interval and QRS duration. LV performance was assessed by both hemodynamic and angiographic measurements. The maximal rate of LV pressure increase (dP/dt), rate of maximal LV pressure decrease (-dP/dt), LV end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP), end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), end-systolic volume (LVESV), stroke volume and percent ejection (EF) were measured during right atrial and AV sequential pacing at a constant pacing rate. The average pacing rate was 97 +/- 3 beats/min (mean +/- standard error of the mean). In each patient, both dP/dt and -dP/dt decreased significantly (p less than 0.001) during AV sequential pacing compared with atrial pacing at the same rate, from 1,541 +/- 68 to 1,319 +/- 56 mm Hg/s for dP/dt and from 1,506 +/- 86 to 1,276 +/- 92 for -dP/dt. LVEDP did not change significantly when atrial (17 +/- 3 mm Hg) and AV sequential pacing (16 +/- 2 mm Hg) were compared. Mean LVEDV did not change during atrial (135 +/- 13 ml) or AV sequential pacing (137 +/- 14 ml). In contrast, the LVESV during AV sequential pacing was higher by 15 ml (23%) (from 48 +/- 10 to 63 +/- 12 ml) (p less than 0.001); as a result, the stroke volume was lower by 13 ml (15%) and the EF decreased by 10%, from 66 to 56% (-15%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effect of rate-dependent left bundle branch block on global and regional left ventricular function

Seven subjects with rate-dependent left bundle branch block (RDLBBB) and 13 subjects with normal conduction (control group) underwent upright bicycle exercise radionuclide angiography to determine the effects of the development of RDLBBB on global and regional left ventricular function. Six of the seven subjects with RDLBBB had atypical chest pain syndromes; none had evidence of cardiac disease based on clinical examination and either normal cardiac catheterization or exercise thallium-201 scintigraphy. Radionuclide angiograms were recorded at rest and immediately before and after RDLBBB in the test group, and at rest and during intermediate and maximal exercise in the control group. The development of RDLBBB was associated with an abrupt decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in six of seven patients (mean decrease 6 +/- 5%) and no overall increase in LVEF between rest and maximal exercise (65 +/- 9% and 65 +/- 12%, respectively). In contrast, LVEF in the control group was 62 +/- 8% at rest and increased to 72 +/- 8% at intermediate and 78 +/- 7% at maximal exercise. The onset of RDLBBB was associated with the development of asynchronous left ventricular contraction in each patient and hypokinesis in four of seven patients. All patients in the control group had normal wall motion at rest and exercise. These data indicate that the development of RDLBBB is associated with changes in global and regional ventricular function that may be confused with development of left ventricular ischemia during exercise.

Left ventricular performance during exercise in patients with left bundle branch block: evaluation by gated radionuclide ventriculography

To investigate changes in left ventricular (LV) function during exercise in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB), 22 patients without a history or physical findings of previous myocardial infarction or LV dysfunction were studied by gated radionuclide ventriculography (GRNV) at rest and during bicycle exercise. Coronary arteriography demonstrated greater than 75% diameter narrowing of at least one coronary artery in nine patients. Of the remaining 13 patients, GRNV demonstrated wall motion abnormalities in seven patients either at rest or with exercise. During exercise, mean ejection fraction (EF) did not increase in patients without coronary artery disease (CAD). Patients with CAD had a 12-point fall in mean EF with exercise. We conclude that LV reserve, as demonstrated by ability to increase EF with exercise, is impaired in patients with LBBB even in the absence of CAD or other underlying cardiac disease and that standard GRNV criteria to exclude the presence of CAD (a greater than five-point increase in EF with exercise and normal wall motion) are not strictly applicable in screening patients with LBBB.

Chest pain and rate-dependent left bundle branch block in patients with normal coronary arteriograms

A triad of exertional chest discomfort, transient rate-dependent left bundle branch block (LBBB), and normal coronary arteries is presented in seven consecutive patients. Although the clinical symptoms resembled effort angina, qualities atypical of classic angina pectoris were commonly noted: 1) the onset was always abrupt; and 2) the pain was local, never radiating; 3) palpitation; and 4) "walk through" phenomenon were often present. The abrupt pain took place simultaneously with the appearance of LBBB induced by physical exercise in all seven patients. Atrial pacing or spontaneous resting heart rate changes produced similar sensations and LBBB in four of the five patients examined in this way. Similarly, in the same four patients kinetocardiographic recordings disclosed a sudden occurrence of paradoxic cardiac movement at the moment LBBB and chest pain appeared. The paradoxic systolic motion disappeared at reversion to normal conduction.

The influence of ectopic beats and tachyarrhythmias on stroke volume and cardiac output

The potentially adverse influence of premature ectopic beats or tachyarrhythmias on cardiac performance was studied by assessing the echocardiographic left ventricular stroke volume in 21 patients with cardiac rhythm disturbances. The beat to beat stroke volume correlated closely with end-diastolic volume in each patient (average R = .9). Premature ventricular contractions decreased stroke volume by an average of 48 +/- 8 ml (-71%) compared with sinus beats; whereas the postextrasystolic beats, although preceded by a pause and higher end-diastolic volume, increased stroke volume by only 16 +/- 7 ml (18%) over the sinus beats. Those postextrasystolic beats with equivalent timing and end-diastolic volume to the sinus beats had a mean stroke volume only 8 ml higher, suggesting that postextrasystolic potentiation plays only a minor role in augmenting stroke volume. Transient aberrant ventricular conduction of intermittent left bundle branch block, ectopic beats or atrial fibrillation failed to alter stroke volume. Ventricular bigeminy, trigeminy and quadrigeminy lowered cardiac output by 1.3, .9 and .7 l/min. The onset of tachyarrhythmias was oftentimes associated with a continuously changing end-diastolic volume and stroke volume, with either alternation or progressive increment of these variables. It is apparent that premature contractions decrease stroke volume by virtue of their infringement on diastolic filing, the principle beat to be determinant of stroke volume in arrhythmias being left ventricular end-diastolic volume. Since premature beats decrease stroke volume to an extent greater than postextrasystolic beats increase it, they may reduce cardiac output by a substantial degree, depending on their frequency of occurrence and degree of prematurity.