Adenosine stress echocardiography

Hyperventilation/Breath-Hold Maneuver to Detect Myocardial Ischemia by Strain-Encoded CMR: Diagnostic Accuracy of a Needle-Free Stress Protocol

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a fast, needle-free test for myocardial ischemia using fast Strain-ENCoded (fSENC) cardiovascular MR (CMR) after a hyperventilation/breath-hold maneuver (HVBH).

BACKGROUND

Myocardial stress testing is one of the most frequent diagnostic tests performed. Recent data indicate that CMR first-pass perfusion outperforms other modalities. Its use, however, is limited by the need for both, a vasodilatory stress and the intravenous application of gadolinium. Both are associated with added cost, safety concerns, and patient inconvenience. The combination of 2 novel CMR approaches, fSENC, an ultrafast technique to visualize myocardial strain, and HVBH, a physiological vasodilator, may overcome these limitations.

METHODS

Patients referred for CMR stress testing underwent an extended protocol to evaluate 3 different tests: 1) adenosine-perfusion; 2) adenosine-strain; and 3) HVBH-strain. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed using quantitative coronary angiography as reference.

RESULTS

A total of 122 patients (age 66 ± 11years; 80% men) suspected of obstructive coronary artery disease were enrolled. All participants completed the protocol without significant adverse events. Adenosine-strain and HVBH-strain provided significantly better diagnostic accuracy than adenosine-perfusion, both on a patient level (adenosine-strain: sensitivity 82%, specificity 83%; HVBH-strain: sensitivity 81%, specificity 86% vs. adenosine-perfusion: sensitivity 67%, specificity 92%; p < 0.05) and territory level (adenosine-strain: sensitivity 67%, specificity 93%; HVBH-strain: sensitivity 63%, specificity 95% vs. adenosine-perfusion: sensitivity 49%, specificity 96%; p < 0.05). However, these differences in diagnostic accuracy disappear by excluding patients with history of coronary artery bypass graft or previous myocardial infarction. The response of longitudinal strain differs significantly between ischemic and nonischemic segments to adenosine (ΔLS_ischemic = 0.6 ± 5.4%, ΔLS_nonischemic = -0.9 ± 2.7%; p < 0.05) and HVBH (ΔLS_ischemic = 1.3% ± 3.8%, ΔLS_nonischemic = -0.3 ± 1.8%; p = 0.002). Test duration of HVBH-strain (t = 64 ± 2 s) was significantly shorter compared with adenosine-strain (t = 184 ± 59 s; p < 0.0001) and adenosine-perfusion (t = adenosine-perfusion: 172 ± 59 s; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

HVBH-strain has a high diagnostic accuracy in detecting significant coronary artery stenosis. It is not only significantly faster than any other method but also neither requires contrast agents nor pharmacological stressors.

Utilization of stress echocardiography in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of stress echocardiography in the risk stratification and prognosis of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD).

BACKGROUND

Stress echocardiography is an established technique for diagnosis, risk stratification, and prognosis of patients with known or suspected CAD.

METHODS

We evaluated 409 patients (65 ± 10 years; 63% men) referred for stress echocardiography (45% treadmill, 55% dobutamine), who underwent stress echocardiography and coronary angiography within 3 months. All patients had multivessel CAD as defined by coronary stenosis (≥50% left main or ≥70% in two or more major epicardial vessels or branches). The left ventricle was divided into 16 segments and was scored on a five-point scale of wall motion. Patients with abnormal results on stress echocardiography were defined as those with stress-induced ischemia (increase in wall motion score of ≥1 grade).

RESULTS

Follow-up (3.1 ± 1.3 years) for nonfatal myocardial infarction (n = 35) and cardiac death (n = 25) was obtained. In patients with multivessel CAD, stress echocardiography effectively risk-stratified normal (no ischemia, n = 83) vs. abnormal (ischemia, n = 326) groups for cardiac events (event rate 1.9 vs. 5.4%/year; P < 0.01). Multivariable Cox proportional-hazards regression model identified stress-induced ischemia (hazard ratio 5.5, 95% confidence interval 1.9-15.9, P = 0.002) as the most significant predictor of adverse cardiac events. A stepwise Cox proportional-hazards model demonstrated significant incremental prognostic value of stress echocardiography over clinical variables, stress electrocardiography and resting left ventricular function (P < 0.0001), with the highest global chi-square value.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with angiographically significant multivessel CAD, despite normal-stress echocardiography, there was an intermediate cardiac event rate (1.9%/year); abnormal-stress echocardiography identified a high-risk group (5.4%/year); and stress echocardiography provided incremental prognostic value for risk stratification and prediction of cardiac events.

Prognostic value of treadmill stress echocardiography at extremes of exercise performance: submaximal <85% maximum predicted heart rate versus high exercise capacity ≥ 10 metabolic equivalents

BACKGROUND

Submaximal stress testing or achieving <85% maximum predicted heart rate (MPHR) may lead to nondiagnostic results and indeterminate outcomes. High exercise capacity (≥ 10 metabolic equivalents, METS) is a predictor of favorable prognosis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of submaximal or high exercise capacity stress echocardiography.

METHODS

We evaluated 1781 patients (55 ± 13 years; 59% male) undergoing treadmill stress echocardiography divided into 811 patients with submaximal (<85% MPHR) and 970 patients with high exercise capacity (≥ 10 METS). Resting left ventricular ejection fraction and regional wall motion were assessed. The left ventricle was divided into 16 segments and scored on 5-point scale of wall motion. Abnormal stress echocardiography was defined as stress-induced ischemia (wall-motion score of ≥ 1 grade). Follow-up (3.3 ± 1.5 years) for nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) (n = 40) and cardiac death (n = 52) were obtained.

RESULTS

By univariate analysis, echocardiographic variables of ejection fraction, peak wall-motion score index (WMSI) and number of new ischemic wall-motion abnormalities were significant predictors of cardiac events. Cumulative survival was significantly worse in patients with abnormal (ischemic) versus normal (nonischemic) stress echocardiography in submaximal (4.4%/year vs. 1.3%/year, P < 0.0001) and high exercise capacity (1.5%/year vs. 0.2%/year, P < 0.0001) studies. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis identified number of new ischemic wall-motion abnormalities as the strongest predictor of cardiac events (P < 0.05) in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite normal stress echocardiography, the inability to achieve 85% MPHR conferred a higher, intermediate cardiac event rate of 2.9%/year. The ability to achieve 9 minutes (≥ 10 metabolic equivalents, METS) conferred an overall low cardiac event rate of 0.4%/year. However, the absence or presence of ischemia by stress echocardiography was able to further risk stratify patients with either submaximal or high exercise capacity studies.

Prognostic value of stress echocardiogram in patients with angiographically significant coronary artery disease

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of stress echocardiography in patients with angiographically significant coronary artery disease (CAD). Two hundred sixty patients (mean age 63 ± 10 years, 58% men) who underwent stress echocardiography (41% treadmill, 59% dobutamine) and coronary angiography within 3 months and without intervening coronary revascularization were evaluated. All patients had significant CAD as defined by coronary stenosis ≥70% in major epicardial vessels or branches (45% had single-vessel disease, and 55% had multivessel disease). The left ventricle was divided into 16 segments and scored on a 5-point scale of wall motion. Patients with abnormal results on stress echocardiography were defined as those with stress-induced ischemia (increase in wall motion score of ≥1 grade). Follow-up (3.1 ± 1.2 years) for nonfatal myocardial infarction (n = 23) and cardiac death (n = 6) was obtained. In patients with angiographically significant CAD, stress echocardiography effectively risk stratified normal (no ischemia, n = 91) in contrast to abnormal (ischemia, n = 169) groups for cardiac events (event rate 1.0%/year vs 4.9%/year, p = 0.01). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified multivessel CAD (hazard ratio 2.53, 95% confidence interval 1.16 to 5.51, p = 0.02) and number of segments in which ischemia was present (hazard ratio 4.31, 95% confidence interval 1.29 to 14.38, p = 0.01) as predictors of cardiac events. A Cox proportional-hazards model for cardiac events showed small, significant incremental value of stress echocardiography over coronary angiography (p = 0.02) and the highest global chi-square value for both (p = 0.004). In conclusion, in patients with angiographically significant CAD, (1) normal results on stress echocardiography conferred a benign prognosis (event rate 1.0%/year), and (2) stress echocardiographic results (no ischemia vs ischemia) added incremental prognostic value to coronary angiographic results, and (3) stress echocardiography and coronary angiography together provided additive prognostic value, with the highest global chi-square value.

The changing paradigm of stress echocardiography: risk stratification, prognosis, and future directions

The use of stress echocardiography has undergone considerable evolution in the past 3 decades. Although stress echocardiography was first introduced as a noninvasive diagnostic tool for determining the presence or absence of coronary artery disease (CAD), it later served a prognostic role as well. The importance of stress echocardiography in risk stratification and prognosis is substantially undervalued by clinicians. The identification of patients at risk for future cardiac events has become a primary objective in noninvasive evaluation of patients with suspected or known CAD. In particular, the ability of stress echocardiography to identify patients at low (< 1%), intermediate (1%-5%), or high (> 5%) risk for future cardiac events is essential to decision making in patient management. Moreover, previous studies have conclusively demonstrated the incremental prognostic value of stress echocardiography over clinical and treadmill exercise data in predicting future cardiac events. This article presents a primarily single-center experience of retrospective and observational studies that address the current role of stress echocardiography and summarize its use for risk stratification, prognosis, and determining clinical outcomes, as well as cost-effective integration of such information in patient management decision making.

Risk Stratification and Prognosis in Octogenarians Undergoing Stress Echocardiographic Study

BACKGROUND

The prognostic value of stress echocardiography (SE) for the diagnosis and risk stratification of coronary artery disease in octogenarians is not well defined.

METHODS

Follow-up of 5 years (mean 2.9 +/- 1.0 years) for confirmed nonfatal myocardial infarction (n = 17) and cardiac death (n = 37) was obtained in 335 patients, age > or =80 years (mean age 84 +/- 3 years, 44% male), undergoing SE (33% treadmill, 67% dobutamine). Left ventricular (LV) regional wall motion was assessed by a consensus of two echocardiographers and scored as per standard five-point scale, 16-segment model of wall motion analysis. Ischemic LV wall segment was defined as deterioration in the thickening and excursion during stress (increase in wall-motion score index (WMSI) > or =1).

RESULTS

By univariate analysis, inducible ischemia (chi-square = 38.4, P < 0.001), left ventricular ejection fraction (chi-square = 41.2, P < 0.001), a history of previous myocardial infarction (chi-square = 22.3, P < 0.01), hypertension (chi-square = 33, P < 0.01), and age (chi-square = 27.7, P < 0.01) were significant predictors of future cardiac events. WMSI, an index of inducible ischemia, provided incremental prognostic information when forced into a multivariable model where clinical and rest echocardiography variables were entered first. WMSI effectively stratified octogenarians into low- and high-risk groups (annualized event rates of 1.2 versus 5.8%/year, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Stress echocardiography yields incremental prognostic information in octogenarians and effectively stratifies them into low- and high-risk groups. Precise therapeutic decision making in very elderly patients should incorporate combined clinical and stress echocardiography data.

Transient ischemic left ventricular cavity dilation is a significant predictor of severe and extensive coronary artery disease and adverse outcome in patients undergoing stress echocardiography

BACKGROUND

Transient ischemic dilation (TID) of the left ventricle on stress-redistribution thallium-201 scintigraphy is a marker of severe and extensive coronary artery disease (CAD), and associated with an adverse outcome. The significance of transient ischemic dilation during stress echocardiography is not well defined.

METHODS

We assessed 155 patients undergoing stress echocardiography (61% treadmill exercise, 39% dobutamine) with confirmed follow-up (mean 2.8 +/- 1.1 years) for hard events (myocardial infarction, n = 14, and cardiac death, n = 9).

RESULTS

Normal limits for TID ratio were developed using data from 39 patients with a low likelihood (<5%) of CAD and normal stress echocardiography study findings. The criteria for abnormality was developed based on data from 116 patients who underwent coronary angiography after and within 3 months of an abnormal ischemic stress echocardiography study result. For normal limits, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that abnormal TID ratio values corresponded to left ventricular volume ratios greater than 1.17 (mean +/- 2SD). TID assessment using these criteria for abnormality showed high sensitivity (100%) and moderate specificity (54%) for detection of severe and extensive angiographic CAD. Patients with TID had a greater extent and severity of stress induced wall-motion abnormalities, higher peak wall-motion score index, and worse prognosis than patients without TID.

CONCLUSIONS

TID during stress echocardiography is a sensitive marker of severe and extensive angiographic CAD and is associated with a high risk of cardiac events (19.7%/y event rate).

Novel stress echocardiographic model incorporating the extent and severity of wall motion abnormality for risk stratification and prognosis

The prognostic value of stress echocardiography to predict future cardiac events using the extent and severity of wall motion abnormalities is not well defined. The objective of this study was to develop and validate a prognostic model for interpretation of stress echocardiographic studies by using the extent and severity of wall motion abnormalities. We evaluated 1,500 patients (59 +/- 13 years old; 51% men) who underwent stress echocardiography (34% on the treadmill exercise and 66% on dobutamine). Left ventricular regional wall motion was assessed by consensus of 2 experienced echocardiographers. Follow-up periods (mean 2.7 +/- 1.0 years) for confirmed myocardial infarction (n = 31) and cardiac death (n = 44) were identified. Multivariate regression analysis identified 2 independent predictors of cardiac events: the number of left ventricular wall segments with new wall motion abnormalities (an index of the extent of ischemia) and the maximal magnitude of new wall motion abnormalities (an index of the severity of ischemia). The ischemic extent (chi-square 48.7, p <0.0001) and maximal severity (chi-square 52.0, p <0.0001) were exponentially correlated with an increase in event rate. On the basis of these data, a prognostic model was defined that uses ischemic extent and maximal severity as stress-dependent orthogonal variables. With this 3-dimensional model, the predicted event rate ranged over sevenfold, from a low of 0.9%/year in patients without any wall motion abnormalities to a high of 6.7%/year in patients with extensive and severe wall motion abnormalities. The extent and severity of wall motion abnormalities by stress echocardiography are independent and cumulative predictors of prognosis in patients who have suspected or known ischemic heart disease.

Myocardial velocities measured during adenosine, dobutamine and supine bicycle exercise: a tissue Doppler study in healthy volunteers

BACKGROUND

Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) quantified by tissue Doppler (TVI) have improved the diagnostic capacity of the procedure. Quantification of other stress modalities, e.g. adenosine stress echo (ASE) and exercise stress echocardiography (ESE) are necessary for assessing any pathophysiological differences in different forms of stress.

METHODS

Ten healthy individuals underwent ASE, DSE, and ESE during a span of 2-5 days. Left ventricular (LV) apical images at rest and peak stress (max) were postprocessed using TVI on a GE System FiVe equipment. ECG-derived QRS duration (QRSD, ms), heart rate (HR, bpm), TVI-estimated basal systolic velocities (S2V, cm s(-1)), ejection time (S2T, ms) and strain (S, %) were computed off-line and compared. Longitudinal displacement imaging, tissue tracking, was also made.

RESULTS

Data for ASE, DSE and ESE during peak stress were (HR: 84 +/- 12***, 142 +/- 19, 137 +/- 27; P<0.001) (QRSD: 92 +/- 18**, 74 +/- 13, 79 +/- 9; P<0.05), (S2T: 307 +/- 34***, 175 +/- 53, 192 +/- 25; P<0.001) and (S%: 26.0 +/- 3.0, 21.2 +/- 7.3, 22.1 +/- 5.1; P = n.s.) respectively. Velocity response, registered in the LV septum at max, was lowest during ASE (7.4 +/- 1.4) highest during DSE (13.0 +/- 2.7; P<0.001 versus ASE) and somewhat intermediate during ESE (11.3 +/- 3.5; P<0.001 versus ASE). In contrast, strain and displacement did not differ.

CONCLUSION

ASE evokes significantly less LV systolic response compared with both DSE and ESE. Increased velocity (P<0.05 versus rest) and strain (P>0.05) response at a much lower HR indicates that adenosine has minor effects on contraction presumably secondary to vasodilatation. Powerful chronotropic response to DSE and ESE is probably prerequisite for strong velocity response at the expense of strain and displacement. TVI-assisted stress echocardiography thereby shows different LV systolic response in healthy individuals, depending on stress modality.

Comparing stress testing methods. Available techniques and their use in CAD evaluation

Exercise stress testing remains one of the most widely used techniques in assessing functional capacity and in confirming a diagnosis of CAD. Its sensitivity and specificity are approximately 63% and 74%, respectively. The technique is safe when administered and supervised by qualified personnel who are trained to recognize contraindications and other reasons for termination of the test. More recently, echocardiography has been combined with exercise stress testing. It is a well-tolerated and valuable procedure for noninvasive evaluation of CAD. The sensitivity and specificity of stress echocardiography are higher than those of exercise stress testing and comparable to those of nuclear perfusion imaging. Continuing improvements in digital image analysis, cost, and the availability of contrast agents promise to make noninvasive stress testing even more useful in the years to come. Newer contrast and concomitant perfusion agents are on the horizon and may prove to be a reality in the echocardiographic laboratories of the future.

Practical applications in stress echocardiography

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to define appropriate parameters for risk stratification and prognosis in patients undergoing stress echocardiography.

BACKGROUND

Stress echocardiography is an established technique for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. However, current data on risk stratification of patients undergoing stress echocardiography are limited.

METHODS

We evaluated 1,500 patients (59 +/- 13 years old; 51% male) undergoing stress echocardiography (34% with treadmill exercise and 66% with dobutamine). Resting left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) and regional wall motion were assessed by the consensus of two echocardiographers. Follow-up (mean 2.7 +/- 1.0 years) for confirmed non-fatal myocardial infarction (n = 31) and cardiac death (n = 44) were performed.

RESULTS

By univariate analysis, both the peak wall motion score index (WMSI) (p < 0.0001) and EF (p < 0.0001) were significant predictors of cardiac events. Peak WMSI effectively risk stratified patients into low (0.9%/year), intermediate (3.1%/year), and high (5.2%/year) risk groups (p < 0.0001). A threshold of 45% EF provided further risk stratification of all WMSI groups. By multivariate logistic regression analysis, peak WMSI (relative risk [RR] 2.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0 to 4.4; p = 0.04) and EF (RR 1.0, 95% CI 0.9 to 1.0; p = 0.01) were both predictors of cardiac events.

CONCLUSIONS

Stress echocardiography yields prognostic information for risk stratification of patients with known or suspected ischemic heart disease. A normal stress echocardiographic study (peak WMSI = 1.0) confers a benign prognosis (0.9%/year cardiac event rate). Peak WMSI >1.7 and EF < or =45% are independent markers of patients at high risk of an adverse clinical outcome.

The role of stress echocardiography in children

Exercise and pharmacological stress echocardiography are well-accepted techniques of evaluating coronary artery disease in adults. In children, however, experience with stress echocardiography is limited and continues to evolve. The objective of this focused review was to describe the experience with exercise and dobutamine stress echocardiography in the pediatric population, with an emphasis on technique, current indications, and future directions. Experience is reported in children with prior Kawasaki disease or heart transplant recipients, as well as patients with congenital coronary abnormalities. In addition, stress echocardiography has been used in patients who have undergone coronary artery bypass graft surgery to evaluate short- and long-term graft patterning. Stress echocardiography appears to be a feasible, safe, and useful modality for the noninvasive assessment of flow-limiting stenosis in the pediatric population and can be used serially in the routine follow-up and risk stratification in children at risk for coronary events.

Enhanced detection of ischemic myocardium by transesophageal dobutamine stress echocardiography: comparison with simultaneous transthoracic echocardiography

The diagnostic accuracy of dobutamine stress echocardiography is limited in patients with poor transthoracic acoustic windows. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) overcomes these limitations and thus may increase the clinical usefulness of dobutamine stress echocardiography. The present study was designed to compare the diagnostic accuracies of transesophageal and transthoracic dobutamine stress echocardiography for the identification of coronary artery disease (CAD) in a cohort of patients with a higher incidence of poor acoustic windows. Forty-two male patients (mean age, 66 +/- 9 years) underwent dobutamine stress echocardiography with simultaneous transesophageal and transthoracic imaging. Coronary arteriography was performed in 28 patients (67%). Transesophageal imaging adequately visualized 99.6% of left ventricular segments compared with 76.2% visualized by transthoracic imaging (P < 0.0001). There was substantial agreement between the two techniques for segmental wall motion analysis at baseline (kappa 0.76; 95% CI, 0.70-0.82); however, at peak dobutamine dose, agreement was significantly reduced (kappa 0.62; 95% CI, 0.55-0.69). The sensitivity (88% vs 75%), specificity (100% vs 75%), and positive predictive value (100% vs 80%) for the identification of CAD were all superior for transesophageal imaging. Transesophageal imaging correctly identified 11 of the 12 patients (92%) with multivessel disease compared with 5 patients (42%) identified by transthoracic imaging (P < 0.03). There were no major complications. Transesophageal dobutamine stress echocardiography is a safe, feasible, and accurate technique for the identification and risk stratification of patients with CAD. Transesophageal imaging appears to be superior to transthoracic imaging for identifying both the presence and extent of CAD, specifically in patients with poor acoustic windows.